`
`
`Ekwan E. Rhow - State Bar No. 174604
` erhow@birdmarella.com
`Grace W. Kang - State Bar No. 271260
` gkang@birdmarella.com
`A. Howard Matz - State Bar No. 55892
` hmatz@birdmarella.com
`BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER,
`WOLPERT, NESSIM,
`DROOKS, LINCENBERG &
`RHOW, P.C.
`1875 Century Park East, 23rd Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90067-2561
`Telephone: (310) 201-2100
`Facsimile: (310) 201-2110
`
`Nicholas Groombridge (pro hac vice)
` ngroombridge@paulweiss.com
`Jenny C. Wu (pro hac vice)
` jcwu@paulweiss.com
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND,
`WHARTON & GARRISON LLP
`1285 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, New York 10019-6064
`Telephone: (212) 373-3000
`Facsimile: (212) 757-3990
`
`
`
`David J. Ball, Jr. (pro hac vice)
` dball@paulweiss.com
`J. Steven Baughman (pro hac vice)
` sbaughman@paulweiss.com
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND,
`WHARTON & GARRISON LLP
`2001 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006-1047
`Telephone: (202) 223-7300
`Facsimile: (202) 223-7420
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Twitter, Inc.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
`
` CASE NO. 2:19-cv-01444-GW (KSx)
`
`DEFENDANT TWITTER, INC.’S
`NOTICE OF MOTION AND
`MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT
`TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6)
`
`
`Date: August 29, 2019
`Time: 8:30 a.m.
`Crtrm.: 9D
`
`Assigned to Hon. George H. Wu
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED, a Canadian
`corporation,
`
`
`vs.
`
`TWITTER, INC., a Delaware
`corporation,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:19-cv-01444-GW (KSx)
`TWITTER, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-01444-GW-KS Document 39 Filed 06/25/19 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:648
`
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on August 29, 2019 at 8:30 a.m., or as soon
`thereafter as the matter may be heard before the Hon. George H. Wu in Courtroom
`9D of the above-captioned Court, located at 350 West First Street, Los Angeles,
`California 90012, Defendant Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) will, and hereby does, move the
`Court to dismiss Plaintiff Blackberry Limited’s First Amended Complaint in its
`entirety with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), on the following grounds:
`
`The specifically identified claims of the Patents-in-Suit that are the basis
`of Counts I-VII in the First Amended Complaint are patent-ineligible
`under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
`This Motion is based upon this Notice, the accompanying Memorandum of
`Points and Authorities, all of the pleadings, papers, and records of this action, all
`matters upon which judicial notice may be taken, and any arguments that may be
`presented at the hearing on this Motion.
`This Motion is made following the conference of counsel pursuant to L.R. 7-3,
`which took place telephonically on June 5, 2019.
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`
`
`1
`Case No. 2:19-cv-01444-GW (KSx)
`TWITTER, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-01444-GW-KS Document 39 Filed 06/25/19 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:649
`
`
`DATED: June 25, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Nicholas Groombridge
`Nicholas Groombridge
`
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
`GARRISON LLP
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`1285 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, New York 10019-6064
`Telephone: (212) 373-3000
`Facsimile: (212) 757-3990
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Twitter, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`Case No. 2:19-cv-01444-GW (KSx)
`TWITTER, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
