throbber

`Case 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG Document 28 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:291
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Jacqueline K. S. Lee
`JONES DAY
`1755 Embarcadero Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94303
`Telephone: 650.739.3939
`Facsimile: 650.739.3900
`jkslee@jonesday.com
`
`Blaney Harper
`JONES DAY
`51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20001-2113
`Telephone: 202.879.3939
`Facsimile: 202.626.1700
`bharper@jonesday.com
`Attorneys for Defendant Cree, Inc.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`Document Security Systems, Inc.,
`Case No. 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG
`DECLARATION OF JOHN A.
`Plaintiff,
`DEMOS IN SUPPORT OF
`DEFENDANT CREE, INC.’S
`MOTION TO TRANSFER
`VENUE PURSUANT TO 28
`U.S.C. § 1404(a)
`
`v.
`Cree, Inc.,
`
`Defendant.
`I, John A. Demos, declare as follows:
`I am currently Associate General Counsel for Intellectual Property
`1.
`for Cree, Inc. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration,
`and if called to do so, could and would testify completely thereto.
`Cree, Inc. (“Cree”) is a corporation organized under the laws of the
`2.
`state of North Carolina with a principal place of business in Durham, North
`Carolina.
`Cree currently has approximately 5,990 employees worldwide with
`3.
`approximately 3,500 located in the United States. Of those 3,500 U.S.
`employees, about 2,420 work in or around Durham, North Carolina.
`
`
`NAI-1502961067v1
`
`

`

`
`Case 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG Document 28 Filed 09/06/17 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:292
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Cree is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina and has other
`4.
`United States facilities in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, Racine,
`Wisconsin and Goleta, California.
`A substantial amount of Cree’s manufacturing facilities are located
`5.
`in North Carolina. Certain of Cree’s manufacturing concerning packaging of
`components is located in China. Cree’s facilities in Racine, Wisconsin,
`manufactures lighting fixtures (not bulbs). Cree’s facility in Goleta, California
`(a.k.a. the Santa Barbara Technology Center or “SBTC”) engages in research
`and development. While certain technology developed at SBTC may be
`incorporated in certain Cree products, the SBTC facility is not responsible for
`the production, manufacture, sale, or marketing of any product.
`I have been made aware of the Cree products which are alleged in
`6.
`the Complaint to be infringing certain patents allegedly owned by Document
`Security Systems, Inc. (“DSS”). As I understand the DSS allegations, the
`accused products are: XLamp ML-B, ML-C. ML-E, MX-3S, XR-C, XR-E, MC-
`E, CLM1, CLM2, CLM3, CLM4, CLP6, SMD Full Color, SMD Full Color
`Side-View, XP-G2, XB-D, XB-H, XH-B, XH-G, XHP35, XM-L, XM-L2, XP-
`C, XP-E, XP-G, XP-L, XM-L2, XP-C, XP-E, XP-E2, XP-G, XP-G2, XP-G3,
`XP-L, XP-I2, XQ-A, XQ-B, XQ-D, XQ-E, XT-E, MHB-A, MHB-B, MHD-E,
`MHD-G, MK-R, MK-R2, MT-G, XHP, CLM, CLV, CLX, CLY, SLV.
`The corporate records concerning the structure, operation and
`7.
`manufacture of the above listed accused products, as well as the corporate
`records concerning the financial expenditures associated with the accused
`products and the revenues associated with the sale of these accused products are
`located in Durham North Carolina.
`8. While Cree has not completed its review of the matter, Cree has
`identified certain employees with knowledge of the records concerning the
`accused products. Charles Burnside has knowledge concerning Cree’s corporate
`
`2
`NAI-1502961067v1
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG Document 28 Filed 09/06/17 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:293
`Case
`:17-cv-04263-JVS—JCG Document 28 Filed 09/06/17 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:293
`
`records relating to the company’s general finances. Charles Lesko has
`
`knowledge concerning Cree’s practices and records relating to Cree’s s ales of
`
`the accused products. Craig Hardin has knowledge concerning Cree’s practices
`
`and records relating to Cree’s marketing of the accused products. Chris Hussell,
`
`Jesse Reiherzer, and Colin Blakely have knowledge concerning the engineering,
`
`structure, operation and manufacturing of the accused products. All these
`
`witnesses are located in North Carolina. To the extent Cree identifies cther
`
`witnesses regarding the structure of the accused products, Cree expects such
`
`witnesses to be located in North Carolina.
`
`9.
`
`Cree is not presently aware of any material evidence concerning the
`
`production, manufacture, sale, or marketing of accused products located in the
`
`SBTC facility.
`
`10.
`
`Cree has no facilities or place of business in Texas and is unaware
`
`of any evidence within Texas that is in its possession, custody or contrcl relevant
`
`to the claims of this matter.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United Si ates that
`
`the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed this 28th day of August, 2017.
`
`i.
`
`,4
`f. .
`f
`
`lW/r fl. ‘ BIA/x»
`
`JOIfii K. Demos
`
`l
`
`\OOOKIONLn-F-UJNI—n
`
`mummAmMr—‘OEESEGESEZS
`
`mmmmmmwmm
`
`
`
`NAl-1502961067v1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket