throbber
Case 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG Document 14 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:131
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`0
`
`DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
` v.
`
`CREE, INC.
`
`Defendant(s).
`
`CASE NO:
`2:17−cv−04263−JVS−JCG
`
`ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f)
`SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
`
`Monday, August 21, 2017 at 11:30
`AM
`
` This case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna. If plaintiff has not
`
`already served the complaint (or any amendment thereto) on all defendants,
`
`plaintiff shall promptly do so and shall file proofs of service within three days
`
`thereafter. Defendants also shall timely serve and file their responsive pleadings
`
`and file proofs of service within three days thereafter.
`
` This matter is set for a scheduling conference on the above date. The
`
`conference will be held pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 16(b). The parties are
`
`reminded of their obligations under Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 26(a)(1) to disclose
`
`information (without awaiting a discovery request) and under Rule 26(f) to confer
`
`///
`
` −1−
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG Document 14 Filed 06/15/17 Page 2 of 8 Page ID #:132
`on a discovery plan not later than twenty−one (21) days prior to the scheduling
`
`conference and to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report not later than fourteen (14) days
`
`after they confer. Failure to comply with the following requirements or to
`
`cooperate in the preparation of the Joint Rule 26(f) Report may lead to the
`
`timposition of sanctions.
`
`Unless there is a likelihood that upon motion by a party the
`
`Court would order that any or all discovery is premature, it is advisable for
`
`counsel to begin to conduct discovery actively before the Scheduling
`
`0
`
`Conference. At the very least, the parties shall comply fully with the letter
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`and spirit of Rule 26(a) and thereby obtain and produce most of what would
`
`be produced in the early stage of discovery.
`
`1. Joint Rule 26(f) Report.
`
` The Joint Rule 26(f) Report, which shall be filed not later than one
`
`week before the scheduling conference, shall be drafted by plaintiff (unless the
`
`parties agree otherwise), but shall be submitted and signed jointly. "Jointly"
`
`contemplates a single report, regardless of how many separately−represented
`
`parties there are. The Joint Rule 26(f) Report shall report on all matters
`
`enumerated below, which include those required to be discussed by Rule 26(f)
`
`and Local Rule 26:
`
` a. Synopsis: a short synopsis (not to exceed two pages) of the main
`
` claims, counterclaims, and/or affirmative defenses.
`
` b. Legal issues: a brief description of the key legal issues.
`
` c. Damages: the realistic range of provable damages.
`
`///
`
` −2−
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG Document 14 Filed 06/15/17 Page 3 of 8 Page ID #:133
` d. Insurance: whether there is insurance coverage, the extent of
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
` coverage, and whether there is a reservation of rights.
`
` e. Motions: a statement of the likelihood of motions seeking to (i) add
`
` other parties or claims or (ii) file amended pleadings or (iii) transfer
`
` venue.
`
` f. Discovery and experts: pursuant to Rule 26(f), state what, if any,
`
` changes in the disclosures under R. 26(a) should be made; the
`
` subjects on which discovery may be needed and whether discovery
`
` should be conducted in phases or otherwise be limited; what
`
`0
`
` discovery has been conducted thus far; whether applicable
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
` limitations should be changed or other limitations imposed; and
`
` whether the Court should enter other orders. Please state how many
`
` depositions each side will conduct. Also discuss the proposed time
`
` of expert witness disclosures under F.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2).
`
` g. Dispositive motions: a description of the issues or claims that any
`
` party believes may be determined by motion for summary judgment
`
` or motion in limine.
`
` h. Settlement and settlement mechanism: a statement of what settlement
`
` discussions and/or written communications have occurred (specifically
`
` excluding any statement of the terms discussed) and a statement
`
` pursuant to the Local Rule 16−14.4 selecting a settlement mechanism
`
` under that rule.
`
` i. Trial estimate: realistic estimate of the time required for trial and
`
` whether trial will be by jury or by court. Each side should specify
`
` (by number, not by name) how many witnesses it contemplates
`
` calling. If the time estimate for trial given in the Rule 26(f) Joint
`
` Report exceeds eight court days, counsel shall be prepared to discuss
`
` in detail the estimate.
`
` −3−
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG Document 14 Filed 06/15/17 Page 4 of 8 Page ID #:134
` j. Timetable: complete of the Presumptive Schedule of Pretrial Dates
`
` form attached as Exhibit A to this Order and attach it to the Rule 26(f)
`
` report. Submission of a completed Exhibit A is mandatory. The current
`
` entries in the "Weeks Before Trial" column merely reflect what the
`
` Court believes are appropriate for many, if not most, cases; those entries
`
` are not necessarily applicable to this case, and the form is designed to
`
` enable counsel to request the Court to set different last dates by which
`
` the key requirements must be completed. Each side should write in the
`
` month, day and year it requests for each event. E.g., for the expert
`
`0
`
` discovery cut−off it might be "10/7/02" for plaintiff and "10/28/02" for
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
` defendant, if they cannot agree. At the conference, the Court will review
`
` this form with counsel. Each entry proposing dates shall fall on a
`
` Monday, except the trial date which is a Tuesday. In appropriate cases
`
` the Court will order different dates after it hears from Counsel. The
`
` proposed non−expert and expert discovery cut−off date means: the last
`
` day by which all depositions must be completed and responses to all
`
` previously−served written discovery must be provided. The proposed
`
` cut−off date for motions means: the last date on which motions may
`
` be heard, not noticed.
`
` k. Other issues: a statement of any other issues affecting the status or
`
` management of the case (e.g., unusually complicated technical or
`
` technological issues, disputes over protective orders, extraordinarily
`
` voluminous document production, non−English speaking witnesses,
`
` discovery in foreign jurisdictions, etc.).
`
` l. Conflicts: for conflict purposes, corporate parties must identify all
`
` subsidiaries, parents and affiliates.
`
`///
`
`///
`
` −4−
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG Document 14 Filed 06/15/17 Page 5 of 8 Page ID #:135
` m. Patent cases: propose dates and methodology for claim construction
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
` and Markman hearings. The Court requires the parties to file
`
` concurrent opening briefs and concurrent reply briefs for the hearing.
`
` The Court intends to follow the rule for patent cases which have
`
` been adopted by the Northern District of California.
`
` n. Magistrates: Do the parties wish to have a Magistrate Judge preside?
`
` Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the parties may consent to have a Magistrate
`
` Judge preside over all the proceedings, not just discovery. They may
`
` pick any Magistrate Judge (not just the one assigned to this case)
`
`0
`
` from among those Magistrate Judges who accept these designations.
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
` (They are identified on the Central District’s website, which also
`
` contains the consent form.)
`
`The Joint Rule 26(f) Report should set forth the above enumerated information
`
`under section headings corresponding to this Order.
`
`2. Scheduling Conference.
`
` Scheduling Conferences will be held in the Ronald Reagan Building,
`
`411 West Fourth Street, Court Room 10C, Santa Ana. Counsel shall comply with
`
`the following:
`
` a. Participation: The lead trial attorney must attend the Scheduling
`
` Conference, unless excused for good cause shown in advance of the
`
` Scheduling Conference.
`
` b. Continuance: A continuance of the Scheduling Conference will be
`
` granted only for good cause.
`
`///
`
` −5−
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG Document 14 Filed 06/15/17 Page 6 of 8 Page ID #:136
`3. Protective Orders.
`
` If you seek a protective order, propose it to opposing counsel before
`
`the Scheduling Conference, if at all possible. Protective Orders are considered by
`
`the Magistrate Judge assigned in this action.
`
`4. Notice to be Provided by Counsel.
`
` Plaintiff’s counsel or, if plaintiff is appearing pro se, defendant’s
`
`0
`
`counsel, shall provide this Order to any parties who first appear after the date of
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`this Order and to parties who are known to exist but have not yet entered
`
`appearances.
`
`5. Disclosures to Clients.
`
` Counsel are ordered to deliver to their respective clients a copy of
`
`this Order and of the Court’s Scheduling and Case Management Order, which
`
`contains the schedule that the Court sets at the Scheduling Conference.
`
`6. Court's Website.
`
` Copies of this and all other orders of this Court that may become
`
`applicable to this case are available on the Central District of California website,
`
`at "www.cacd.uscourts.gov," under "Judge’s Procedures and Schedules." Copies
`
`of the Local Rules are available on the website.¹
`
`¹Local rules may be purchased from the following:
`
` Los Angeles Daily Journal West Publishing Co. Metropolitan News
` 915 East First Street 50 West Kellogg Boulevard 210 South Spring Street
` Los Angeles, CA 90012 St. Paul MN 55164−9979 Los Angeles, CA 90012
`
` −6−
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG Document 14 Filed 06/15/17 Page 7 of 8 Page ID #:137
` The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`cooperation in carrying out these requirements.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`DATED: June 15, 2017
`
`James V. Selna
`United States District Judge
`
`Copies to: All Counsel of Record
`
`0
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
` −7−
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-04263-JVS-JCG Document 14 Filed 06/15/17 Page 8 of 8 Page ID #:138
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA
`PRESUMPTIVE SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL DATES
`
` Matter
`
` Trial date (jury) (court)
` Estimated length: _________ days
` [Court trial:] File Findings of Fact and
` Conclusions of Law and Summaries of
` Direct Testimony
` Final Pretrial Conference; Hearing on
` Motions in Limine; File Agreed Upon
`Set of Jury Instructions and Verdict
`Forms and Joint Statement re Disputed
` Instructions and Verdict Forms; File
` Proposed Voir Dire Qs and Agreed−to
` Statement of Case
` Lodge Pretrial Conf. Order;
` File Memo of Contentions of Fact and
` Law; Exhibit List; Witness List; Status
` Report re Settlement
` Last day for hand−serving Motions in
` Limine
`
` Last day for hearing motions
`
` Last day for hand−serving motions and
` filing (other than Motions in Limine).
`
` Non−expert Discovery cut−off
`
` Time
`
`8:30 a.m.
`(Tuesdays)
`
`11:00 a.m.
`(Mondays)
`
`1:30 p.m.
`(Mondays)
`
`Weeks
`before
`trial
`
` Plaintiff's
` Request
` (Insert
` specific
` date)
`
` Defendant's
` Request
` (Insert
` specific
` date)
`
` Court
` Order
`
`−1
`
`−2
`
`−3
`
`−6
`
`−7
`
`−11
`
`−15
`
`ADDITIONAL MATTERS TO BE DETERMINED AT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
`
`L.R. 16−14 Settlement Choice: (1) CT/USMJ (2) Court Mediation Panel (3) Private ADR
`
` Expert discovery cut−off
` Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure
` Opening Expert Witness Disclosure [See
` F.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)]
` Last day to conduct Settlement
` Conference
` Last day to amend pleadings or add
` parties
`
`Revised 4−14−16
`
` −8−
`
`0
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket