`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
`EASTERN DIVISION
`
`MARCUS GRAY P/K/A FLAME; LECRAE
`MOORE P/K/A LECRAE; EMANUEL
`LAMBERT; and CHIKE OJUKWU,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 4:14-CV-01183-HEA
`
`
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`KATY PERRY; JORDAN HOUSTON P/K/A
`JUICY J; LUKASZ GOTTWALD P/K/A DR.
`LUKE; SARAH THERESA HUDSON; MAX
`MARTIN; HENRY RUSSELL WALTER
`P/K/A CIRKUT; and CAPITOL RECORDS,
`LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
`
`Defendant Capitol Records, LLC (the “Defendant”) submits the following Answer to the
`
`Complaint of Marcus Gray, Lecrae Moore, Emanuel Lambert and Chike Ojukwu (“Plaintiffs”).
`
`With respect to the allegations set forth in the Complaint, Defendant:
`
`Introduction
`
`1.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the Complaint, except admits
`
`that this is a civil action for alleged copyright infringement under the United States Copyright
`
`Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq., and that the Complaint seeks, inter alia, injunctive relief.
`
`2.
`
`Denies the allegations in the first sentence of Paragraph 2 of the Complaint
`
`because the term “mega-hit” used in that sentence is vague and undefined. Defendant denies
`
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in the
`
`second and third sentences of Paragraph 2 of the Complaint. Defendant denies knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in the fourth
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-05642-CAS-JC Document 21 Filed 09/30/14 Page 2 of 10 Page ID #:76
`
`sentence of Paragraph 2 of the Complaint, except admits that it is informed and believes that
`
`millions of copies of the sound recording by Katy Perry of the composition “Dark Horse” have
`
`been sold in various configurations. Defendant denies knowledge or information sufficient to
`
`form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in the fifth sentence of Paragraph 2 of the
`
`Complaint, except admits that a recording by Katy Perry of the composition “Dark Horse” has
`
`been broadcast on certain radio stations in the United States. Defendant denies knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in the final
`
`sentence of Paragraph 2 of the Complaint.
`
`3.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 of the Complaint, except denies
`
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation regarding the
`
`date of release of the recording entitled “Joyful Noise.”
`
`4.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of Paragraph 4 of the
`
`Complaint. Defendant denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
`
`of the allegations contained in the second sentence of Paragraph 4 of the Complaint.
`
`The Plaintiffs
`
`5.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 5 of the Complaint.
`
`6.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 6 of the Complaint.
`
`7.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 7 of the Complaint.
`
`8.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 8 of the Complaint.
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-05642-CAS-JC Document 21 Filed 09/30/14 Page 3 of 10 Page ID #:77
`
`The Defendants
`
`9.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 9 of the Complaint.
`
`10.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 10 of the Complaint.
`
`11.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 11 of the Complaint.
`
`12.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 12 of the Complaint.
`
`13.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 13 of the Complaint.
`
`14.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 14 of the Complaint.
`
`15.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 15 of the Complaint except admits
`
`that Defendant is a Delaware limited liability company.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`16.
`
`Admits that this is a civil action for alleged copyright infringement under the
`
`United States Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. Defendant avers that the remainder of the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 16 of the Complaint set forth legal conclusions as to which no response
`
`is required. To the extent a response is required, the statements are denied.
`
`17.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 17 of the Complaint.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-05642-CAS-JC Document 21 Filed 09/30/14 Page 4 of 10 Page ID #:78
`
`18.
`
`Avers that the allegations in Paragraph 18 of the Complaint set forth legal
`
`conclusions as to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, the
`
`statements are denied.
`
`Plaintiffs’ Song: “Joyful Noise”
`
`19.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 19 of the Complaint.
`
`20.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 20 of the Complaint.
`
`21.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 21 of the Complaint.
`
`22.
`
`Avers that Paragraph 22 of the Complaint sets forth legal conclusions as to which
`
`no response is required. To the extent Paragraph 22 of the Complaint contains factual
`
`allegations, Defendant denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
`
`of them.
`
`23.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 23 of the Complaint.
`
`24.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 24 of the Complaint.
`
`25.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 25 of the Complaint.
`
`26.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 26 of the Complaint.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-05642-CAS-JC Document 21 Filed 09/30/14 Page 5 of 10 Page ID #:79
`
`Defendants’ Song: “Dark Horse”
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 27 of the Complaint.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 28 of the Complaint, except admits
`
`that the credited writers of the composition “Dark Horse” are: Lukasz Gottwald p/k/a “Dr.
`
`Luke”, Jordan Houston p/k/a “Juicy J”, Sarah Hudson, Katy Perry, Karl Martin Sandberg p/k/a
`
`“Max Martin”, and Henry Walter p/k/a “Cirkut.”
`
`29.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 30 of the Complaint.
`
`30.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 30 of the Complaint, except admits
`
`that the album Prism was released in October 2013, and that the sound recording by Katy Perry
`
`of the composition “Dark Horse” was released as a promotional single.
`
`31.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 31 of the Complaint.
`
`Defendants’ Alleged Infringement of Plaintiffs’ Alleged Copyright
`
`32.
`
`Denies that any portion of the composition “Joyful Noise” (or any derivative
`
`thereof) is copied by or embodied in the composition or sound recording of “Dark Horse.”
`
`Defendant otherwise denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
`
`of the allegations contained in Paragraph 32 of the Complaint, except admits that Defendant did
`
`not seek permission from Plaintiffs for use of the composition “Joyful Noise” in the manner set
`
`forth in Paragraph 32, and avers that no such permission was required.
`
`33.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 33 of the Complaint.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-05642-CAS-JC Document 21 Filed 09/30/14 Page 6 of 10 Page ID #:80
`
`34.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 34 except admits that the compact
`
`disc configuration of the album Prism has been sold on certain websites and in certain retail
`
`stores and that the digital configuration of the sound recording of “Dark Horse” by Katy Perry is
`
`available for sale on certain websites.
`
`35.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph 35 of the Complaint, except admits that Defendant is
`
`informed and believes that Katy Perry performed the composition “Dark Horse” at the 2014
`
`Grammy Awards and at certain concerts.
`
`36.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 36 of the Complaint, except admits
`
`that the official music video for Katy Perry’s recording of “Dark Horse” can be viewed on
`
`www.youtube.com and www.vevo.com, and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form
`
`a belief as to the number of times that video has been viewed.
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 37 of the Complaint.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 38 of the Complaint.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 39 of the Complaint.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 40 of the Complaint, except admits
`
`that, prior to the date of the Complaint, Defendant received a letter from an attorney purporting
`
`to represent the Plaintiffs regarding their claim of alleged infringement.
`
`41.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 41 of the Complaint.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Defendant denies that the Plaintiffs are entitled to the relief requested in their Complaint
`
`or to any other relief whatsoever.
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-05642-CAS-JC Document 21 Filed 09/30/14 Page 7 of 10 Page ID #:81
`
`AFFIRMATIVE AND OTHER DEFENSES
`
`Without waiving or excusing the burden of proof of Plaintiffs, or admitting that
`
`Defendant has any burden of proof, Defendant asserts the following affirmative and other
`
`defenses.
`
`FIRST DEFENSE
`
`The Complaint and any purported claims for relief therein fail to state a claim upon
`
`which relief can be granted.
`
`SECOND DEFENSE
`
`The Complaint and any purported claims for relief therein are barred, precluded, and/or
`
`limited by the statute of limitations.
`
`THIRD DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs have no standing to assert their Complaint and any claim therein. Inter alia,
`
`Plaintiffs lack standing to the extent their claims are based on the alleged infringement of a work
`
`for which Plaintiffs do not (or did not) own the exclusive right allegedly infringed at the time of
`
`infringement.
`
`FOURTH DEFENSE
`
`The alleged copyrighted work that is the subject of this Complaint consists of material
`
`that is not original.
`
`FIFTH DEFENSE
`
`The alleged copyrighted work that is the subject of this Complaint does not constitute
`
`protectable copyrightable subject matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-05642-CAS-JC Document 21 Filed 09/30/14 Page 8 of 10 Page ID #:82
`
`SIXTH DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ Complaint and any claims therein are barred, precluded, and or limited by the
`
`doctrines of waiver, laches, estoppel, acquiescence, consent and express and/or implied license.
`
`SEVENTH DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ Complaint and any claims therein are barred, precluded, and/or limited to the
`
`extent any alleged use of Plaintiffs’ allegedly copyrightable material constitutes fair use.
`
`EIGHTH DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ Complaint and any claims therein are barred, precluded, and/or limited to the
`
`extent any alleged use of Plaintiffs’ allegedly copyrightable material constitutes de minimis use.
`
`NINTH DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ alleged damages, if any, are due solely to acts and omissions that are not those
`
`of, and are independent from, the Defendant.
`
`TENTH DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs have failed to mitigate any alleged damages.
`
`ELEVENTH DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ Complaint and any claims therein are barred by the doctrine of unclean hands.
`
`TWELFTH DEFENSE
`
`
`
`Upon information and belief, Plaintiffs did not obtain a valid copyright registration of the
`
`allegedly infringed work prior to the act of alleged infringement in the Complaint and therefore
`
`Plaintiffs are not entitled to any award of attorneys’ fees or statutory damages under the United
`
`States Copyright Act.
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-05642-CAS-JC Document 21 Filed 09/30/14 Page 9 of 10 Page ID #:83
`
`THIRTEENTH DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims are barred to the extent they are based on the alleged infringement of a
`
`work for which: (i) valid and enforceable copyright registration certificates do not exist and/or
`
`(ii) the relevant certificates contain materially false and/or inaccurate information relating to the
`
`nature, ownership or chain of title to the work.
`
`FOURTEENTH DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ alleged damages, if any, are limited by Defendant’s innocent intent.
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully submits that the Complaint should be dismissed
`
`with prejudice and judgment entered in its favor, and that Defendant be awarded its reasonable
`
`attorney’s fees and costs incurred in the defense of this action pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505.
`
`DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY
`
`Defendant demands a trial by jury of all of Plaintiffs’ claims that are so triable.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP,
`
`
`/s/ Sandra Wunderlich
`By:
`Sandra J. Wunderlich, #39019MO
`Andrew J. Scavotto, #57826MO
`7700 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1100
`St. Louis, MO 63105
`(314) 863-0800 - Telephone
`(314) 863-9388 - Facsimile
`sandra.wunderlich@stinsonleonard.com
`andrew.scavotto@stinsonleonard.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-05642-CAS-JC Document 21 Filed 09/30/14 Page 10 of 10 Page ID #:84
`
`Christine Lepera, Esq.
`pro hac vice motion to be filed
`Jeffrey M. Movit, Esq.
`pro hac vice motion to be filed
`Bradley Mullins, Esq.
`pro hac vice motion to be filed
`MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
`12 East 49th Street, 30th Floor
`New York, NY 10017
`(212) 509-3900 (direct)
`(212) 509-7239 (facsimile)
`ctl@msk.com
`jmm@msk.com
`bym@msk.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Jordan Houston p/k/a
`Juicy J, Lukasz Gottwald p/k/a Dr. Luke, Sarah
`Hudson, Karl Martin Sandberg p/k/a Max Martin,
`Henry Walter p/k/a Cirkut, and Capitol Records,
`LLC
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 30th day of September 2014, the foregoing document was filed
`
`electronically and served upon counsel of record via the court's ECF filing system:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Sandra J. Wunderlich
`
`Attorney for Defendants
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`CORE/9990000.7110/103005696.1
`
`