throbber
Case 2:14-cv-03113-JAK-JEM Document 42 Filed 09/15/14 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:446
`
`
`Date
`
`
`September 15, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
`
`
`LA CV14-02454 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03107 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03106 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03108 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-02962 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03111 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03109 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03114 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03113 JAK (JEMx) SA CV14-00491 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-02963 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-02457 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03105 JAK (JEMx) SA CV14-00497 JAK (JEMx)
`
`
`Signal IP v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
`Signal IP v. Ford Motor Company
`Signal IP v. Nissan North America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, et al.
`Signal IP v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Subaru of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Fiat U.S.A., Inc., et al.
`Signal IP v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC
`Signal IP v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
`Signal IP v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al.
`Signal IP v. Porsche Cars of North America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
`
`
`
`JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`Case No.
`
`
`Title
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Present: The Honorable
`
`
`
`Andrea Keifer
`Deputy Clerk
`Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
`Jason L. Haas
`Ryan E. Hatch
`
`
`
`
`Alex Joko
`Court Reporter / Recorder
`Attorneys Present for Defendants:
`Ahmed J. Davis; Geoffrey D. Beigler
`Linda D. Mettes
`Patrick A. Lujin; Richard Eiszner
`Scott W. Doyle
`Michael J. Lennon
`Khashayar S. Shahida; Ronald J. Pabis
`Clive M. McClintock; Matthew D. Satchwell
`Megan S. Woodworth
`David T. Pollock
`Lisa K. Nguyen
`Joseph Lavelle
`Eugene LeDonne; Edgar H. Haug (via t/c)
`Ali M. Imam; Charles Gorenstein; Laura K. Christa
`
`
`DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER (DKT. 35; LA CV14-03106 - Ford);
`
`
`Proceedings:
`
`
`CV-90 (10/08)
`
`CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-03113-JAK-JEM Document 42 Filed 09/15/14 Page 2 of 4 Page ID #:447
`
`
`
`Case No.
`
`
`Title
`
`Date
`
`
`September 15, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
`
`
`LA CV14-02454 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03107 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03106 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03108 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-02962 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03111 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03109 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03114 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03113 JAK (JEMx) SA CV14-00491 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-02963 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-02457 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03105 JAK (JEMx) SA CV14-00497 JAK (JEMx)
`
`
`Signal IP v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
`Signal IP v. Ford Motor Company
`Signal IP v. Nissan North America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, et al.
`Signal IP v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Subaru of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Fiat U.S.A., Inc., et al.
`Signal IP v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC
`Signal IP v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
`Signal IP v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al.
`Signal IP v. Porsche Cars of North America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT,
`OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT (DKT.
`38; LA CV14-02962 – Nissan);
`
`DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
`COMPLAINT (DKT. 34; LA CV14-03109 – Mercedes-Benz);
`
`DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS FOR WILLFUL
`INFRINGEMENT IN PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 35;
`LA CV14-03113 – Volkswagen);
`
`SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (all cases)
`
`
`The motion hearing is held. The Court states its tentative views that it is inclined to grant in part Defendant
`Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Claims for Willful Infringement in Plaintiff’s
`First Amended Complaint (the “Volkswagen Motion”), Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC’s Motion to
`Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (the “Mercedes Motion”), and Defendant Nissan North
`America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative, for a More Definite
`Statement (the “Nissan Motion”). The Court states its tentative views that it is inclined to grant Ford Motor
`Company’s Motion to Transfer (the “Ford Motion”), and discusses the possibility of transferring the case
`after claim construction. Counsel address the Court. The Court takes the Volkswagen Motion, Mercedes
`Motion, Ford Motion and Nissan Motion UNDER SUBMISSION and will issue a ruling.
`
`
`CV-90 (10/08)
`
`CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-03113-JAK-JEM Document 42 Filed 09/15/14 Page 3 of 4 Page ID #:448
`
`
`
`Case No.
`
`
`Title
`
`Date
`
`
`September 15, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
`
`
`LA CV14-02454 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03107 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03106 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03108 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-02962 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03111 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03109 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03114 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03113 JAK (JEMx) SA CV14-00491 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-02963 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-02457 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03105 JAK (JEMx) SA CV14-00497 JAK (JEMx)
`
`
`Signal IP v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
`Signal IP v. Ford Motor Company
`Signal IP v. Nissan North America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, et al.
`Signal IP v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Subaru of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Fiat U.S.A., Inc., et al.
`Signal IP v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC
`Signal IP v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
`Signal IP v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al.
`Signal IP v. Porsche Cars of North America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
`
`The Scheduling Conference is held. The Court confers with counsel regarding the joint report filed in each
`of the parties’ respective cases. The Court sets the following deadlines as to all actions:
`
`
`TBD:
`
`TBD:
`
`October 14, 2014:
`
`October 28, 2014:
`
`November 14, 2014:
`
`December 12, 2014:
`
`December 19, 2014:
`
`January 9, 2015:
`
`January 30, 2015:
`
`
`February 23, 2015 at 10:00 am:
`
`March 11, 2015:
`
`
`
`CV-90 (10/08)
`
`Last day to participate in a settlement conference/mediation
`
`Post Mediation Status Conference
`
`Infringement Contentions
`
`Exchange of Claim Terms
`
`Exchange Proposed Constructions and Evidence
`
`Complete Claim Construction Discovery
`
`Joint Markman Hearing Prehearing Statement
`
`Simultaneous Opening Markman Briefs
`
`Simultaneous Responding Markman Briefs, Tutorials, and
`Presentation/Powerpoint Materials
`
`Markman Hearing
`
`Claim Construction Decision Issued (anticipated)
`
`CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-03113-JAK-JEM Document 42 Filed 09/15/14 Page 4 of 4 Page ID #:449
`
`
`
`Case No.
`
`
`Title
`
`Date
`
`
`September 15, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
`
`
`LA CV14-02454 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03107 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03106 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03108 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-02962 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03111 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03109 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-03114 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03113 JAK (JEMx) SA CV14-00491 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-02963 JAK (JEMx) LA CV14-02457 JAK (JEMx)
`LA CV14-03105 JAK (JEMx) SA CV14-00497 JAK (JEMx)
`
`
`Signal IP v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
`Signal IP v. Ford Motor Company
`Signal IP v. Nissan North America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, et al.
`Signal IP v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Subaru of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Fiat U.S.A., Inc., et al.
`Signal IP v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC
`Signal IP v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
`Signal IP v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al.
`Signal IP v. Porsche Cars of North America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
`Signal IP v. Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
`
`
`
`March 23, 2015:
`
`
`Joint Report re Scheduling & Case Progression
`
`Status Conference re Scheduling
`
`Counsel are reminded that these actions are not consolidated and, therefore, all pleadings and
`documents shall be filed in the respective case.
`
`Counsel shall meet and confer and file a joint report no later than October 8, 2014, which shall address: (i)
`whether a third party neutral facilitator, either a Magistrate Judge or a private special master, shall be
`appointed to assist the parties with settlement and coordination of the cases to reduce costs and advance
`resolution; (ii) if so, the identification of the specific matter(s) that this person would oversee; (iii) which
`parties, if any, intend to file a motion to transfer and, if so, when the motion is anticipated to be filed; (iv)
`what issues, if any, remain to be resolved at the present time in light of the schedule that has been set for
`the case through claim construction and any agreements the parties are able to reach; and (v) whether
`the parties propose to amend slightly any of the dates that have been set.
`
`March 30, 2015 at 1:30 pm:
`
`Initials of Preparer
`
`
`
`:
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`ak
`
`CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`CV-90 (10/08)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket