`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1704 Filed 08/16/23 Page 1 of 2
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`United States of America,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`Joye Vaught,
`
`
`No. CR-18-0422-07-PHX-DJH
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Appear by
`
`Phone or Videoconference (Doc. 1698). Defense counsel requests that Defendant Vaught
`
`be permitted to appear by phone or teleconference for the August 18, 2023, Frye/Cooper
`
`hearing stating that:
`
`Ms. Vaught lives in the Dallas, Texas area. Round-trip airfare to Phoenix
`and lodging would cost approximately $1,000 before ground transportation
`– a considerable expense for Ms. Vaught, who remains indigent. The Court
`has allowed Ms. Vaught to appear at prior final pretrial conferences and other
`substantive hearings by phone. Ms. Vaught can be available by phone or
`videoconferencing for the August 18, 2023 hearings.
`
`(Id. at 2). Upon good cause shown,
`
`
`
`IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Appear by Phone or
`
`Videoconference (Doc. 1698). Defendant may appear telephonically for the scheduled
`
`Frye/Cooper hearing set August 18, 2023, at 11:30 a.m. before Judge Fine in courtroom
`
`303.
`
` Defense counsel will receive dial-in instructions via separate electronic
`
`communication.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1704 Filed 08/16/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`The Court finds no excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161.
`
`Dated this 16th day of August, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket