`
`
`
`
`Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. (CA 135311, admitted pro hac vice)
`Whitney Z. Bernstein (CA 304917, admitted pro hac vice)
`BIENERT KATZMAN LITTRELL WILLIAMS LLP
`903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 350
`San Clemente, California 92673
`Telephone: (949) 369-3700
`Facsimile: (949)369-3701
`tbienert@bklwlaw.com
`wbernstein@ bklwlaw.com
`Attorneys for James Larkin
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
`
`
`
`United States of America,
`
` Plaintiff,
`vs.
`
`Michael Lacey, et al.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:18-cr-00422-PHX-SMB
`
`DEFENDANT JAMES LARKIN’S
`NOTICE OF JOINDER IN
`DEFENDANT JOHN BRUNST’S
`MOTION FOR A LIMITING
`INSTRUCTION RE: THIRD PARTY
`EVIDENCE ADDRESSED IN THE
`COURT’S AUGUST 11, 2021 ORDER ON
`THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION IN
`LIMINE TO DETERMINE
`ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE
`(DKT. 1247)
`
`
`(Oral argument requested)
`
`Assigned to Hon. Susan M. Brnovich
`Courtroom 506
`
`Trial date: September 1, 2021
`
`Defendant James Larkin, by and through his undersigned counsel, joins in Defendant John
`
`Brunst’s Motion for a Limiting Instruction Re: Third Party Evidence Addressed in the Court’s
`
`August 11, 2021 Order on the Government’s Motion In Limine to Determine Admissibility of
`
`Evidence (Dkt. 1247) (“Motion”).
`
`Defendant James Larkin’s Notice of Joinder in Defendant John Brunst’s Motion for a Limiting Instruction
`Re: Third Party Evidence Addressed in the Court’s August 11, 2021 Order on the Government’s Motion In
`Limine to Determine Admissibility of Evidence (Dkt. 1247)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`
`11
`11
`
`12
`12
`
`13
`13
`
`14
`14
`
`15
`15
`
`16
`16
`
`17
`17
`
`18
`18
`
`19
`19
`
`20
`20
`
`21
`21
`
`22
`22
`
`23
`23
`
`24
`24
`
`25
`25
`
`26
`26
`
`27
`27
`
`28
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1280 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`Mr. Larkin agrees with the arguments made in the Motion. Mr. Larkin adopts the positions
`
`set forth in the Motion as if fully set forth herein.
`
`RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 8th day of SEPTEMBER 2021.
`
`BIENERT KATZMAN LITRELL
` WILLIAMS LLP
`/s/ Whitney Z. Bernstein
`Whitney Z. Bernstein
`Thomas H. Bienert, Jr.
`Attorneys for James Larkin
`
`Defendant James Larkin’s Notice of Joinder in Defendant John Brunst’s Motion for a Limiting Instruction Re:
`Third Party Evidence Addressed in the Court’s August 11, 2021 Order on the Government’s Motion In Limine
`to Determine Admissibility of Evidence (Dkt. 1247)
`
`1
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`
`11
`11
`
`12
`12
`
`13
`13
`
`14
`14
`
`15
`15
`
`16
`16
`
`17
`17
`
`18
`18
`
`19
`19
`
`20
`20
`
`21
`21
`
`22
`22
`
`23
`23
`
`24
`24
`
`25
`25
`
`26
`26
`
`27
`27
`
`28
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1280 Filed 09/08/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that on September 8, 2021, I electronically transmitted the attached document
`
`to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of
`
`Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance as
`
`counsel of record.
`
` /s/ Miriah Edwards
`Miriah Edwards
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`10
`
`11
`11
`
`12
`12
`
`13
`13
`
`14
`14
`
`15
`15
`
`16
`16
`
`17
`17
`
`18
`18
`
`19
`19
`
`20
`20
`
`21
`21
`
`22
`22
`
`23
`23
`
`24
`24
`
`25
`25
`
`26
`26
`
`27
`27
`
`28
`28
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
