`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 1 of 21
`
`
`
`WO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
`
`United States of America,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`Michael Lacey, et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`No. CR-18-00422-001-PHX-SMB
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Expert
`
`Testimony (Doc. 928.) to which the Government has responded. (Doc. 958.) The
`
`Government has also filed the United States’ Motion to Preclude Defendants’ Noticed
`
`Experts. (Doc. 905.) Defendants’ filed a response (Doc. 956.) and requested oral
`
`argument. The motions are related and so the Court enters a ruling on both motions in
`
`limine here. The Court has determined that oral argument is unnecessary to decide these
`
`motions. L.R. Civ. 7.2(f).
`
`I.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`Defendants are former officers, executives, and employees of Backpage.com, a
`
`classified advertisement website. On July 25, 2018, a federal grand jury returned a 100-
`
`count Superseding Indictment against Defendants alleging their commission of numerous
`
`criminal acts—conspiracy, violations of the Travel Act, and money laundering—in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 2 of 21
`
`
`
`operation of Backpage.com (“Backpage”). “The SI contains a lengthy summary of the
`
`alleged facts.” Lacey, 423 F.Supp.3d at 753. Within its 92 pages, it alleges Defendants
`
`“were aware that the overwhelming majority of the website’s ‘adult’ and ‘escort’ ads were
`
`actually ads for prostitution and took a variety of steps to intentionally facilitate that illegal
`
`activity.” (SI ¶ 34; see also id. ¶¶ 9-11.) It also alleges Defendants strategized to increase
`
`the number of prostitution ads on Backpage.com and evade detection by moderating the
`
`website and sanitizing the postings. (Id. ¶¶ 10-11, 13, 35-70, 72-73, 75, 77-96, 98-104, 108,
`
`110, 112, 116-26, 128-30, 132-34, 136, 139, 143, 145, 148.) It further alleges these
`
`strategies were created to “conceal the true nature of the ads on the website,” (Id. ¶ 11.),
`
`identify prostitutes currently advertising on rival websites and offer them free ads on
`
`Backpage.com in an attempt to secure future business (Id. ¶¶ 35-44.), engage with The
`
`Erotic Review to create reciprocal links, and enter into formal business arrangements with
`
`known prostitutes for repeat business. (Id. ¶¶ 45-67.)
`
`The Government has disclosed ten experts to testify about sex trafficking and child sex
`
`trafficking. The proposed testimony was described as follows in the Government’s
`
`disclosure (Doc. 422.):
`
`1. Christina Decouflé (Human Trafficking)
`
`Detective Decouflé will provide testimony at trial about how human trafficking,
`
`with a focus on sex trafficking occurs, and how it occurs through online media, such as
`
`social networking websites, applications, and the internet in general. Detective Decouflé
`
`has been a law enforcement officer with the Phoenix Police Department since 2000. In
`
`2005, she became a detective in the Vice Enforcement Unit. In 2013, Detective Decouflé
`
`became a member of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Human Trafficking Task Force,
`
`Phoenix Division. The Ninth Circuit has affirmed the expert testimony of Detective
`
`Decouflé in the area of human trafficking and this court should permit Detective Decouflé
`
`to testify as to her expert opinions here. See United States v. Brooks, 610 F.3d 1186, 1195-
`
`96 (9th Cir. 2010).
`
`Detective Decouflé will describe how sex trafficking and prosecution industries
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 3 of 21
`
`
`
`have changed with
`
`the advent of
`
`the
`
`internet,
`
`including websites such as
`
`www.craigslist.com, www.backpage.com, and others. Detective Decouflé will describe
`
`how law enforcement conducts human trafficking investigations; with a focus on how
`
`investigations shifted from craigslist.com to backpage.com. She will testify about her
`
`knowledge of The Erotic Review (TER), it’s owner David Elms, and TER’s connection to
`
`websites such as craigslist.com and backpage.com. Detective Decouflé will describe how
`
`she posted advertisements on online websites like craigslist.com and backpage.com
`
`advertising herself (undercover) as seller of commercial sex. She will compare and contrast
`
`how different prostitution websites (including craigslist and backpage) operated and how
`
`they responded to law enforcement. She will also testify about descriptors and definitions
`
`of terms often used in sex trafficking and the prostitution industry, such as “trick,” “John,”
`
`“pimp,” “the game,” “dates,” “choosing up,” as examples. Lastly, Detective Decouflé will
`
`discuss the relationship between sex traffickers and pimps and their victims. She will
`
`describe the methods and process traffickers and pimps utilize to entice, coerce, or control
`
`their victims.
`
`The bases and reasons for the opinions summarized above centers around Detective
`
`Decouflé’s extensive experience conducting sex trafficking investigation. Detective
`
`Decouflé has an extensive experience interviewing prostitutes, pimps, and individuals who
`
`solicit commercial sex and has herself has engaged in numerous investigations requiring
`
`knowledge of the methods that sex traffickers and pimps utilize, whether through online
`
`media or through face-to-face contact, to recruit women into prostitution. Detective
`
`Decouflé has interviewed hundreds of victims and survivors, which enables her to
`
`understand the particular language and methods utilized in the prostitution industry.
`
`2. Dominique E. Roe-Sepowitz, M.S.W., Ph.D. (Sex Trafficking)
`
`Dr. Roe-Sepowitz is expected to testify as a fact witness in this matter, regarding
`
`her interactions with Backpage, the National Center of Missing and Exploited Children
`
`(NCMEC), human sex trafficking prevention and outreach groups in relation to Backpage
`
`related prostitution advertising, as well as Backpage related interactions with state and
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 4 of 21
`
`
`
`federal law enforcement. In an abundance of caution, however, the government provides
`
`notice identifying Dr. Roe-Sepowitz as a potential “expert” in the area of human
`
`trafficking, specifically, sex trafficking.
`
`Dr. Roe-Sepowitz is an Associate Professor in the School of Social Work at Arizona
`
`State University. She is the director of the Office of Sex Trafficking Intervention Research
`
`at Arizona State University. Dr. Roe-Sepowitz’s area of specialty and expertise is in human
`
`sex trafficking with juveniles and adults, with an aim on prevention and awareness,
`
`intervention and treatment.
`
`Dr. Roe-Sepowitz can testify about her research in the area of human sex trafficking.
`
`Specifically and recently, Dr. Roe-Sepowitz participated in (1) a six year analysis of sex
`
`trafficking of minors: exploring characteristics and sex trafficking patterns; (2) a Las Vegas
`
`based study on how violence is often tied to teen sex trafficking; and (3) a Hawaii based
`
`study exploring online sex buyers in Hawaii. Dr. Roe-Sepowitz has also researched the
`
`impact the Super Bowl had on sex trafficking. Dr. Roe-Sepowitz’s research can be found
`
`at https://socialwork.asu.edu/stir/research. While the government intends for Dr. Roe-
`
`Sepowitz to testify as a fact witness at trial, her education, training, and experience, could
`
`lead one to believe that she is an expert in the area of human sex trafficking.
`
`3. Sharon W. Cooper, M.D. (Sex Trafficking)
`
`Dr. Cooper will testify about (1) how a victim can fall into the world of sex
`
`trafficking, through the grooming process, force, or abduction, etc. and why certain victims
`
`may be targeted; (2) the harmful, lasting impact sex trafficking can have on its victims,
`
`primarily child victims; (3) the relationship and loyalty a child sex trafficking victim may
`
`have and show towards her trafficker; (4) common ways a sex trafficker can use force,
`
`fraud, and coercion to maintain control over his victims; (5) reasons why child sex
`
`trafficking is cited as the most underreported form of child abuse; and (6) the role Backpage
`
`played in the victimization of her patients and clients.
`
`Dr. Cooper is a developmental and forensic pediatrician who evaluates and treats
`
`children who have been victims of all forms of abuse, with a primary area of expertise in
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 5 of 21
`
`
`
`sexual exploitation. She is a member of the Board of Directors for the National Center for
`
`Missing and Exploited Children and a retired Colonel with the United States Armed Forces.
`
`Dr. Cooper has testified before the United States Congress, the Russian Parliament, the
`
`Italian Senate and the European Commission on child sexual exploitation. She has also
`
`testified as an expert medical witness in over two dozen federal trials. Dr. Cooper is
`
`familiar with how victims were trafficked on Backpage and her opinions will be based on
`
`her education, training, and her clinical and forensic experiences treating victims of sex
`
`trafficking.
`
`4. James Hardie
`
`Supervisory Special Agent James E. Hardie will testify about (1) terminology
`
`commonly used the sex trafficking, such as pimp, “bottom bitch,” MOB (money over
`
`bitches), “date,” “roses” (money), “the game”, etc.: (2) common dynamics between sex
`
`traffickers and their victims and how a trafficker may use drugs, force, fraud, and coercion
`
`to maintain control over their victims; (3) how human trafficking takes place in our
`
`communities from a law enforcement prospective; and (4) the role of the internet and
`
`Backpage played in his knowledge and understanding of human trafficking and how
`
`Backpage became part of the law enforcement investigations for human trafficking over
`
`the years.
`
`Supervisory Special Agent Hardie began investigating sex trafficking cases
`
`involving both minor and adult victims in 2008, which has resulted in his experience in
`
`interviewing hundreds of victims and witnesses and two dozen pimps or traffickers. From
`
`2008 – 2013, Agent Hardie served as the coordinator of the FBI’s Violent Crimes Against
`
`Children Task Force in Ohio. From 2013 – 2015, he served as the FBI’s representative to
`
`the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), where he coordinated
`
`sex trafficking reporting between NCMEC and the FBI child exploitation task forces. Since
`
`2011, Supervisory Special Agent Hardie has presented or provided instruction at
`
`conferences and seminars, internationally and domestically, in the area of sex trafficking.
`
`Supervisory Special Agent Hardie’s opinions are based on his training and
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 6 of 21
`
`
`
`experience in the area of human trafficking.
`
`5. Derek Stigerts
`
`Investigator Stigerts will testify about (1) how sex trafficking occurs; (2) common
`
`terminology used by individuals involved in sex trafficking; (3) the role of the internet and
`
`technology in human trafficking; (4) methods of recruitment, manipulation, and control by
`
`a trafficker with his victims; and (5) the role the internet and Backpage has played in human
`
`trafficking.
`
`Investigator Stigerts has been involved in the investigation of human trafficking
`
`offenses for over a decade. Investigator Stigerts has interviewed over 300 females involved
`
`in prostitution, including 80 juvenile victims, as well as over 30 suspected pimps or
`
`traffickers. He has presented at instructional courses presented by NCMEC and the FBI.
`
`Investigator Stigerts’ opinions are based on his training and experience in the area of
`
`human sex trafficking.
`
`6. Shannon Wolf, Ph.D., LPC-S
`
`Dr. Wolf will testify about the connection between trauma bonds and personal
`
`identity in victims of sex trafficking and how to understand them, including ways to interact
`
`with child sex trafficking victims to avoid secondary trauma, and the role Backpage has
`
`played in causing trauma victims trafficked through its website. Dr. Wolf is a licensed
`
`professional counselor with supervisory status and a Professor of Psychology and
`
`Counseling at B.H. Carroll Theological Institute. Dr. Wolf’s provides counseling and
`
`therapy to victims of sex trafficking and her current research focus is on child sex
`
`trafficking.
`
`7. Staca Shehan, Executive Director Case Analysis Division, NCMEC
`
`Ms. Shehan is a fact witness as she met on several occasions with Backpage
`
`Defendants. Ms. Shehan is the Executive Director of the Case Analysis Division at the
`
`National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). As a result of her
`
`employment, Ms. Shehan’s testimony will cover topics that could be perceived as expert
`
`testimony. In an abundance of caution, the government provides notice identifying Ms.
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 7 of 21
`
`
`
`Shehan as a potential “expert” in the area of human trafficking, sex trafficking, and child
`
`exploitation.
`
`Specifically, Ms. Shehan will testify to the creation of a dedicated Child Sex
`
`Trafficking Team at NCMEC to respond to the increased need for technical assistance and
`
`analysis in cases involving child sex trafficking. These unique resources include analysis
`
`of potential suspect names or aliases, unique tattoos, link analysis about child sex
`
`trafficking victims/potential victims, telephone numbers, addresses and/or link analysis
`
`about child sex trafficking victims/potential victims, telephone numbers, addresses and/or
`
`online postings.
`
`The government reserves the right to question the expert regarding other matters
`
`that may be raised during cross-examination by Defendants, based upon testimony
`
`provided by defense experts (if any), or other witnesses and evidence introduced by
`
`Defendants. This disclosure of the government’s notice of expert witnesses also serves as
`
`the government’s request for notice of rebuttal or expert testimony by Defendants, pursuant
`
`to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
`
`8. Donna Gavin
`
`From July 2009 to October 2016, Lieutenant Detective Donna Gavin served as a
`
`Sergeant Detective/Commander of the Boston Police Department’s Human Trafficking
`
`Unit. She later served, from May 2016 to April 2019, as the Lieutenant Detective for the
`
`Boston Police Department’s Crimes Against Children and Human Trafficking Units. She
`
`has extensive experience investigating prostitution, human trafficking and child sex
`
`trafficking crimes involving victims who were advertised on Backpage. On August 13,
`
`2015, Lieutenant Detective Gavin provided a declaration in the Northern District of Illinois
`
`that described Backpage’s role in the Boston-area sex trade. Lieutenant Detective Gavin is
`
`expected to testify consistent with her August 13, 2015 declaration, and will provide
`
`additional relevant details about Backpage’s operations in the Boston area. She is also
`
`expected to testify that, in her professional experience as a law enforcement officer for over
`
`30 years, the “adult” section of Backpage not only contained ads for illegal activity,
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 8 of 21
`
`
`
`including prostitution, solicitation and trafficking, but it was also the primary source for
`
`such ads and was well known for that purpose in the sex trafficking industry in Boston,
`
`Massachusetts, until the site was shut down in 2018. Further, Lieutenant Detective Gavin
`
`is expected to testify that Backpage “adult” section provided a vehicle and anonymity for
`
`its users who exploited and trafficked young women and girls, that it provided no legitimate
`
`service and that nearly all the cases the Boston Police Department’s Human Trafficking
`
`Unit found associated with Backpage involved pimp-controlled prostitution.
`
`While the government does not believe that Lieutenant Detective Gavin’s testimony
`
`will involve any opinion testimony, it provides this information out of an abundance of
`
`caution and in the event that any of any her testimony is deemed to constitute expert opinion
`
`testimony. Lieutenant Detective Gavin’s opinions are based on her training and experience
`
`in the areas of human trafficking, crimes against children and sexual assault.
`
`7. Thomas Adam Umporowicz, Jr.
`
`Detective-Sergeant Thomas Adam Umporowicz Jr. is the Detective-Sergeant in
`
`charge of the Seattle Police Department’s Vice/High Risk Victims Unit, a position that he
`
`has held since 2014. He has also served as the Human Trafficking Task Force Sergeant for
`
`the Seattle Police Department. He has more than 30 years of law enforcement experience,
`
`and has trained other law enforcement agencies in the United States in the areas of human
`
`trafficking and internet crimes against children.
`
`On August 14, 2015, Detective-Sergeant Umporowicz provided a declaration that
`
`was filed in the Northern District of Illinois. The declaration described Backpage as the
`
`primary website in the Seattle, Washington area for those looking to solicit a prostitute,
`
`post prostitution ads or traffic prostitutes and minors. In the declaration, Detective-Sergeant
`
`Umporowicz opined that in his professional experience:
`
`
`[T]he adult section of Backpage.com not only contains ads for illegal
`activity, including prostitution, solicitation and trafficking, but it is a primary
`source for such ads and is well known for that purpose in the sex trafficking
`industry in the city of Seattle and State of Washington. But the way
`Backpage.com operates and the anonymity it provides its users makes it more
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 9 of 21
`
`
`
`difficult for us to identify and arrest and prosecute these offenders. It is the
`Seattle Police Department Vice/High Risk Victims Unit position that
`removing the adult section of Backpage.com would greatly assist to disrupt
`these sex traffickers’ easy means of communication and connection for these
`illegal activities and therefore would reduce demand for, and access to, the
`sex trafficking industry within the city of Seattle and the State of
`Washington. This would be useful in protecting the women and children who
`are victimized by those numerous individuals who use Backpage.com for
`these unlawful purposes. In our experience,
`the adult section of
`Backpage.com seems to serve no legal purpose.
`
`Detective-Sergeant Umprowicz is expected to testify consistent with his declaration,
`
`and is expected to provide other pertinent details and observations about Backpage’s
`
`operations in the Seattle area through Backpage’s closure in 2018. He is also expected to
`
`testify about the evolution of prostitution and human trafficking in the Seattle area from
`
`the pre-internet era through the rise of Backpage to the post-Backpage era. He will explain
`
`how the ease-of-use, convenience and relative anonymity of using Backpage (both as a
`
`“john” and as a prostitute or pimp) increased the demand for prostitution services and the
`
`supply of persons who were advertised as prostitutes. He is expected to testify that
`
`Backpage established a near-monopoly on online prostitution advertising in the Seattle
`
`area. He will also explain how, following Backpage’s shutdown, the sex trade has partly
`
`reverted to street-level prostitution (in hotel lobbies, casinos and on the streets), which has
`
`reduced demand and supply and seriously disrupted the sex trade in the Seattle area. He
`
`will also explain that Backpage was continually put on notice by law enforcement of its
`
`facilitation of prostitution through the issuance of search warrants and subpoenas across
`
`the country.
`
`Detective-Sergeant Umprowicz’s opinions are based on his training and experience
`
`in the areas of law enforcement, prostitution, and human and child sex trafficking.
`
`10. Robert Spectre
`
`In April 2019, Spectre authored the report “Beyond Backpage, Buying and Selling
`
`Sex in The United States One Year Later.” The report summarizes the immediate online
`
`disruption following April 2018 when Backpage was seized and the Stop Enabling Sex
`
`- 9 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 10 of 21
`
`
`
`Traffickers Act (SESTA) and Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) were signed into
`
`law. Spectre’s analysis concluded that since the events in April 2018 (including Backpage’s
`
`shut down), the demand for purchasing sex online has been reduced drastically.
`
`Spectre’s background includes tracking online sex trafficking beginning in 2014,
`
`when he was contacted by Polaris (https://polarisproject.org/human-trafficking/facts)
`
`through his company twilio.org, a start-up company that developed text (short code)
`
`technology. That technology is utilized by many different businesses, but was also used to
`
`reach victims of sex trafficking. Since Twilio, Spectre has worked with the Cook County
`
`Sherriff’s Office and the New York Police Department to develop deterrence platforms
`
`focused on combating sex trafficking.
`
`In 2017, Spectre, while working with the NYPD’s Human Trafficking Unit,
`
`developed a demand deterrence platform that focused on the demand side of human
`
`trafficking. The platform would capture phone numbers of “johns” who responded to decoy
`
`ads posted by NYPD on Backpage. When a decoy ad was posted, approximately 150
`
`responses would be captured in a two hour-time frame. Since Backpage was seized,
`
`responses have dropped to 20-30 per day, spread among approximately 12 different
`
`websites. Spectre’s additional qualifications will be provided separately to Defendants.
`
`Defendants noticed 6 experts and 4 general categories where they anticipate expert
`
`testimony but have not yet retained anyone.
`
`Defendants’ expert witness are as follows (Docs. 500, 538.):
`
`1. Bates Butler: The Defendants anticipate presenting expert testimony on
`
`informant/cooperating witness testimony and sentencing. Mr. Butler is anticipated to
`
`testify about the prosecution’s use of such witnesses, defense proffers, cooperation
`
`agreements and the interpretation and application of such agreements, preparation of
`
`informant cooperating witness testimony by the prosecution, plea agreements and
`
`sentencing recommendations and expectations. Mr. Butler’s opinions will be based on his
`
`experience as a former acting United States attorney in the District of Arizona, assistant
`
`- 10 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 11 of 21
`
`
`
`United States Attorney, defense lawyer, seminars he has presented and attended, and his
`
`over four decades of practicing criminal law.
`
`2. Roman Weil: The Defendants anticipate presenting expert testimony on the
`
`following topics: (1) the functions that a Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) performs in a
`
`corporate setting, including what is and is not required of a CFO in assessing allegations
`
`that a company or one of its subsidiaries has engaged in unlawful conduct; and (2) the loan
`
`covenants that are typically included in a seller-financed sale. Professor Weil’s opinions
`
`will be based on his education, extensive experience teaching and writing about corporate
`
`governance and accounting matters, and service on professional boards.
`
`3. Alexandra Levy: The Defendants anticipate presenting expert testimony on the
`
`effect of imposing liability on Backpage for advertisements placed by third parties; the
`
`utility of online commercial advertisements to law enforcement in identifying and rescuing
`
`victims of sex trafficking; sex trafficking and/or prostitution; causation or lack thereof; the
`
`practices of Backpage, Craigslist, Facebook, Google, and other Internet providers as such
`
`practices pertain to these issues, and rebuttal testimony of various plaintiff’s experts
`
`including but not limited to Professor Roe-Sepowitz.
`
`Dr. Levy’s anticipated testimony will be based on her quantitative and qualitative
`
`research, training, academic and outside teaching, practical experience, prior testimony,
`
`authorship of books, articles, and other academic or literary papers published in her field
`
`of expertise, discussions with other experts and persons responsible for editing and
`
`moderation at some of the subject internet providers, review of the books, articles, studies,
`
`and seminars on these topics, and other related experience.
`
`4. Dr. Alexandra Lutnick: The Defendants anticipate presenting expert testimony on
`
`the effect of Imposing liability on Backpage for advertisements placed by third parties; the
`
`utility of online commercial advertisements to law enforcement in identifying and rescuing
`
`victims of sex trafficking; sex trafficking and/or prostitution; causation or lack thereof; the
`
`practices of Backpage, Craigslist, Facebook, Google, and other Internet providers as such
`
`- 11 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 12 of 21
`
`
`
`practices pertain to these issues, and rebuttal testimony of various plaintiff’s experts
`
`including but not limited to Professor Roe-Sepowitz.
`
`The bases of Dr. Lutnick’s anticipated testimony is her quantitative and qualitative
`
`research, training, academic and outside teaching, practical experience, prior testimony,
`
`authorship of books, articles, and other academic or literary papers published in her field
`
`of expertise, discussions with other experts and persons responsible for editing and
`
`moderation at some of the subject internet providers, review of the books, articles, studies,
`
`and seminars on these topics, and other related experience.
`
`5. Dr. Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco: The Defendants anticipate presenting expert
`
`testimony on the effect of imposing liability on Backpage for advertisements placed by
`
`third parties; the utility of online commercial advertisements to law enforcement in
`
`identifying and rescuing victims of sex trafficking; sex trafficking and/or prostitution;
`
`causation or lack thereof; the practices of Backpage, Craigslist, Facebook, Google, and
`
`other Internet providers as such practices pertain to these issues, and rebuttal testimony of
`
`various plaintiff’s experts including but not limited to Professor Roe-Sepowitz.
`
`Dr. Mehlman-Orozco’s anticipated testimony will be based on her quantitative and
`
`qualitative research, training, academic and outside teaching, practical experience, prior
`
`testimony, authorship of books, articles, and other academic or literary papers published in
`
`their field of expertise, discussions with other experts and persons responsible for editing
`
`and moderation at some of the subject internet providers, review of the books, articles,
`
`studies, and seminars on these topics, and other related experience.
`
`6. William Norman: The Defendants anticipate presenting expert testimony on the
`
`lawful formation of and lawful uses of offshore trusts.
`
`Professor Norman’s opinions will be based on his education, training, academic
`
`teaching, practical experience, scholarship, presentations, and other related experience.
`
`
`
`7. The Defendants anticipate presenting expert testimony on law enforcement officers’
`
`investigation and prosecution of sex crimes, including but not limited to prostitution, child
`
`- 12 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 13 of 21
`
`
`
`prostitution, and other related crimes; how the assistance of Internet site owners and
`
`employees render and impede assistance in these investigations, the terminology used in
`
`the sex industry by legal escorts, strippers, fetishists, and illegal prostitution. The expert(s)
`
`in this field have not yet been retained, but may include former and/or current FBI agents
`
`and state law enforcement officers who worked with Backpage and publicly and privately
`
`commended Backpage on its cooperation. The correspondence, with the names, agencies
`
`and contact information, relating to this cooperation is in the possession of the government,
`
`and has not yet been fully disclosed, notwithstanding the government’s Rule 16 and Brady
`
`obligations.
`
`8. The Defendants anticipate presenting expert testimony on editing and moderating
`
`Internet sites by the owners and employees of the sites, the challenges and expense
`
`involved in editing and moderating, the evolving standards of editing and moderating in
`
`the Internet provider community from 2004 to the present, the editing and moderating
`
`practices of Backpage, Craigslist, Facebook, Google, and other Internet providers and the
`
`reasonableness of Backpage practices, the state and federal regulating standards relating to
`
`editing and moderating practices, impeachment of the government’s experts and other
`
`related topics. The expert(s) in this field have not yet been retained, but his/her/their
`
`anticipated testimony will be based on said experts’ training, academic teaching, practical
`
`experience, authorship of books, articles, and other academic or literary papers published,
`
`discussions with other experts and persons responsible for editing and moderation at many
`
`of the internet providers in the United States, review of the books, articles, studies, and
`
`seminars on these topics, impeachment of the government’s experts, and other related
`
`experience.
`
`9. The Defendants anticipate presenting expert testimony on the marketing
`
`aggregation strategies and techniques used by newspapers both for print and online
`
`publications to boost readership and to generate advertising revenue. The expert(s) in this
`
`field have not yet been retained, but his/her/their anticipated testimony will be based on
`
`said experts’ training, academic teaching, practical experience, authorship of books,
`
`- 13 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:18-cr-00422-SMB Document 1081 Filed 10/27/20 Page 14 of 21
`
`
`
`articles, and other academic or literary papers published, discussions with other experts
`
`and persons responsible for marketing and aggregation strategies and techniques at some
`
`of the subject Internet providers, review of the books, articles, studies, and seminars on
`
`these topics, impeachment of the government’s experts, and other related experience.
`
`10. The Defendants anticipate presenting expert testimony on the lawful formation of
`
`and lawful uses of offshore trusts as a mater of United States and European Union law. The
`
`expert(s) in this field have not yet been retained, but his/her/their anticipated testimony will
`
`be based on said experts’ training, academic teaching, practical experience, authorship of
`
`books, articles, and other

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site