`
`
`
`WO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
`
`No. CV-07-02513-PHX-GMS
`
`ORDER
`
`
`Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, on
`behalf of himself and all others similarly
`situated, et al.,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`and
`
`United States of America,
`
` Plaintiff-Intervenor,
`
`v.
`
`Gerard A. Sheridan, in his official capacity
`as Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona; et
`al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court held an emergency telephonic hearing this afternoon at 4:30 in response
`
`to MCSO’s request. In the hearing, MCSO requested that it cancel the community meeting
`
`scheduled for this evening at 6:30 PM at Frank Elementary School in Guadalupe. The
`
`Community Meeting is required by Court Order. See Doc. 2431 at ¶ 109.
`
`Community meetings can be at times active and even have attracted organized
`
`protests, but the Monitor has had a history of running them without incident for the last
`
`eleven years. The Court has been advised that the site was previewed by the MCSO this
`
`Monday and the cafeteria was selected by them as the optimal location. The MCSO has,
`
`however, deemed it necessary to raise security concerns this afternoon in light of protests
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 3125 Filed 02/05/25 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`in the Phoenix area regarding immigration policies of the new administration, one of which,
`
`in Glendale, required police intervention. There has been a separate and peaceful protest
`
`at the state capitol earlier today. The MCSO is aware of no specific threats regarding the
`
`Community Meeting. The Monitor has had personnel surveying the site since earlier this
`
`afternoon. There is, at present, no indication of a crowd or any other protest activity. The
`
`MCSO plans on providing twenty officers as security for the event. It has done no formal
`
`risk assessment and is aware of no specific threats. Certainly, however, in light of recent
`
`events, the focus of the meeting could become uncontrollable and go beyond that
`
`authorized by Court order.
`
` Plaintiff is reluctant to cancel the community meeting, especially at this late hour.
`
`It has been advertised for many weeks prior to the event and is viewed by the Plaintiff as
`
`an effective and necessary way to provide MCSO with community feedback. Unwarranted
`
`concern about threats, when there are no specific threats, could deter further participation
`
`at this and other community meetings.
`
`The Monitor is experienced at making risk assessments. The meeting will,
`
`therefore, go forward as usual under the direction of the Monitor. However, the Court
`
`empowers the Monitor to make an assessment whether the meeting can safely proceed,
`
`and, if necessary to cancel or terminate the meeting if security concerns, or a lack of control
`
`dictate such a course of action. Chief Hawthorne’s consultation with the Monitor in this
`
`respect is welcome.
`
`Dated this 5th day of February, 2025.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`