Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 3125 Filed 02/05/25 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`WO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
`
`No. CV-07-02513-PHX-GMS
`
`ORDER
`
`
`Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, on
`behalf of himself and all others similarly
`situated, et al.,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`and
`
`United States of America,
`
` Plaintiff-Intervenor,
`
`v.
`
`Gerard A. Sheridan, in his official capacity
`as Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona; et
`al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court held an emergency telephonic hearing this afternoon at 4:30 in response
`
`to MCSO’s request. In the hearing, MCSO requested that it cancel the community meeting
`
`scheduled for this evening at 6:30 PM at Frank Elementary School in Guadalupe. The
`
`Community Meeting is required by Court Order. See Doc. 2431 at ¶ 109.
`
`Community meetings can be at times active and even have attracted organized
`
`protests, but the Monitor has had a history of running them without incident for the last
`
`eleven years. The Court has been advised that the site was previewed by the MCSO this
`
`Monday and the cafeteria was selected by them as the optimal location. The MCSO has,
`
`however, deemed it necessary to raise security concerns this afternoon in light of protests
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 3125 Filed 02/05/25 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`in the Phoenix area regarding immigration policies of the new administration, one of which,
`
`in Glendale, required police intervention. There has been a separate and peaceful protest
`
`at the state capitol earlier today. The MCSO is aware of no specific threats regarding the
`
`Community Meeting. The Monitor has had personnel surveying the site since earlier this
`
`afternoon. There is, at present, no indication of a crowd or any other protest activity. The
`
`MCSO plans on providing twenty officers as security for the event. It has done no formal
`
`risk assessment and is aware of no specific threats. Certainly, however, in light of recent
`
`events, the focus of the meeting could become uncontrollable and go beyond that
`
`authorized by Court order.
`
` Plaintiff is reluctant to cancel the community meeting, especially at this late hour.
`
`It has been advertised for many weeks prior to the event and is viewed by the Plaintiff as
`
`an effective and necessary way to provide MCSO with community feedback. Unwarranted
`
`concern about threats, when there are no specific threats, could deter further participation
`
`at this and other community meetings.
`
`The Monitor is experienced at making risk assessments. The meeting will,
`
`therefore, go forward as usual under the direction of the Monitor. However, the Court
`
`empowers the Monitor to make an assessment whether the meeting can safely proceed,
`
`and, if necessary to cancel or terminate the meeting if security concerns, or a lack of control
`
`dictate such a course of action. Chief Hawthorne’s consultation with the Monitor in this
`
`respect is welcome.
`
`Dated this 5th day of February, 2025.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket