throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`210563Orig1s000
`210563Orig2s000
`
`
`OTHER REVIEW(S)
`
`

`

`MEMORANDUM
`REVIEW OF REVISED LABEL AND LABELING
`Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA)
`Office of Medication Error Prevention and Risk Management (OMEPRM)
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE)
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
`
`Date of This Memorandum:
`February 15, 2018
`Requesting Office or Division:
`Division of Hematology Products (DHP)
`Application Type and Number: NDA 210563
`Product Name and Strength:
`Imbruvica (ibrutinib) tablets, 140 mg, 280 mg, 420 mg, and
`560 mg
`Pharmacyclics LLC
`February 14, 2018
`2017-1815-2
`Nicole Garrison, PharmD, BCPS
`Hina Mehta, PharmD
`
`Applicant/Sponsor Name:
`FDA Received Date:
`OSE RCM #:
`DMEPA Safety Evaluator:
`DMEPA Team Leader:
`
`PURPOSE OF MEMO
`1
`The Division of Hematology Products (DHP) requested that we review the revised carton
`labeling and blister pack labeling for Imbruvica tablets (Appendix A) to determine if it is
`acceptable from a medication error perspective. The revisions are in response to
`recommendations that we made during a previous label and labeling review.a
`
` CONCLUSION
`2
`The revised carton labeling and blister pack labeling for Imbruvica tablets is acceptable from a
`medication error perspective. We have no further recommendations at this time.
`
`a Garrison N. Label and Labeling Review Memo for IMBRUVICA (NDA 210563). Silver Spring (MD): FDA, CDER, OSE,
`DMEPA (US); 2018 FEB 07. RCM No.: 2017-1815-1.
`
`1
`
`Reference ID: 4222519
`
`8 Page(s) of Draft Labeling have been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`NICOLE B GARRISON
`02/15/2018
`
`HINA S MEHTA
`02/15/2018
`
`Reference ID: 4222519
`
`

`

`MEMORANDUM
`REVIEW OF REVISED LABEL AND LABELING
`Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA)
`Office of Medication Error Prevention and Risk Management (OMEPRM)
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE)
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
`
`Date of This Memorandum:
`February 7, 2018
`Requesting Office or Division:
`Division of Hematology Products (DHP)
`Application Type and Number: NDA 210563
`Product Name and Strength:
`Imbruvica (ibrutinib) tablets, 140 mg, 280 mg, 420 mg, and
`560 mg
`Pharmacyclics LLC
`January 22, 2018
`2017-1815-1
`Nicole Garrison, PharmD, BCPS
`Hina Mehta, PharmD
`
`Applicant/Sponsor Name:
`FDA Received Date:
`OSE RCM #:
`DMEPA Safety Evaluator:
`DMEPA Team Leader:
`
`PURPOSE OF MEMO
`1
`The Division of Hematology Products (DHP) requested that we review the revised carton
`labeling and blister pack labeling for Imbruvica tablets (Appendix A) to determine if it is
`acceptable from a medication error perspective. The revisions are in response to
`recommendations that we made during a previous label and labeling review.a
`
` CONCLUSION
`2
`The revised carton labeling and blister pack labeling is unacceptable from a medication error
`perspective. For the carton labeling, there is inadequate differentiation between the 140 mg
`capsule strength
` and the 420 mg tablet strength
`.
`In our previous label and labeling review for Imbruvica tablets, we recommended deletion of
` on the blister pack labeling
`
`. The Sponsor
`acknowledged our concern, however; based upon several market research studies they
`conducted with patients, nurses, pharmacists, and distributors,
`labeling was
`
`a Garrison N. Label and Labeling Review for Imbruvica (NDA 210563). Silver Spring (MD): FDA, CDER, OSE, DMEPA
`(US); 2018 JAN 11. RCM No.: 2017-1815.
`
`1
`
`Reference ID: 4216695
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`the preferred package configuration
`
`. We acknowledge the
`Sponsor’s response to our information request, but provide additional revisions to the blister
`pack labeling. As currently presented, the blister pack labeling may potentially confuse the
`intended users and differs from other available dose packs.
`
`
`
`RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PHARMACYCLICS LLC
`3
`We recommend the following be implemented prior to approval of this NDA:
`A. Carton labeling
`There is inadequate differentiation between the 140 mg capsule strength
` and the 420 mg tablet strength
`). Revise the color scheme of
`the 420 mg tablet strength
`, so that it appears in its own unique
`color and the color does not overlap with any other colors utilized in highlighting
`the strengths. The use of the same
` scheme for the product’s 140 mg
`capsule and 420 mg tablet strengths minimizes the difference between the
`strengths, which may lead to wrong strength selection errors.
`B. Blister pack labeling
`1. We recommend deleting
`
`
`
`
` in the blister pack as this may confuse the intended
`
`user.
`2. For increased clarity, we recommend
`
`
`
`
`
`3. We also recommend deleting
`
`.
`4. Add the proprietary name, established name, and product strength from the
`back of the blister pack labeling to the front of the blister pack labeling. In
`addition, revise the product strength to display the strength per tablet (e.g. 560
`mg per tablet).
`
`b Response to Information Request received on January 22, 2018.
`2
`
`Reference ID: 4216695
`
`7 Page(s) of Draft Labeling have been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`NICOLE B GARRISON
`02/07/2018
`
`HINA S MEHTA
`02/07/2018
`
`Reference ID: 4216695
`
`

`

`Department of Health and Human Services
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Office of Medical Policy
`
`PATIENT LABELING REVIEW
`
`January 19, 2018
`
`Ann Farrell, MD
`Director
`Division of Hematology Products (DHP)
`
`LaShawn Griffiths, MSHS-PH, BSN, RN
`Associate Director for Patient Labeling
`Division of Medical Policy Programs (DMPP)
`
`Barbara Fuller, RN, MSN, CWOCN
`Team Leader, Patient Labeling
`Division of Medical Policy Programs (DMPP)
`
`Susan Redwood, MPH, BSN, RN
`Patient Labeling Reviewer
`Division of Medical Policy Programs (DMPP)
`
`Nisha Patel, PharmD
`Regulatory Review Officer
`Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP)
`Review of Patient Labeling: Patient Package Insert (PPI)
`
`IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib)
`
`tablets, for oral use
`
`
`Date:
`
`To:
`
`
`Through:
`
`
`From:
`
`Subject:
`
`Drug Name (established
`name):
`Dosage Form and
`Route:
`Application
`Type/Number:
`Applicant:
`
`NDA 210563
`
`Pharmacyclics LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4209235
`
`

`

` 1
`
`
`
` 2
`
`INTRODUCTION
`On August 31, 2017, Pharmacyclics LLC., submitted for the Agency’s review a 505
`(b) (1) New Drug Application (NDA) 210563 for IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) tablets,
`for oral use. IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) capsules, for oral use, 140 mg was approved
`by the Agency in November 2013. To reduce the patient pill burden, and improve
`patient’s compliance, a new tablet formulation of ibrutinib in four strengths was
`developed by Pharmacyclics. The purpose of this submission is to seek the approval
`of IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) tablets for the same approved indications as the
`approved capsule formulation (NDA 205552), for the treatment of adult patients
`with:
` Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have received at least one prior therapy
`•
`• Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL)
`• Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) with
`17p deletion
`• Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM)
`• Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) who require systemic therapy and have
`received at least one prior anti-CD20-based therapy
`• Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) after failure of one or more lines of
`systemic therapy.
`This collaborative review is written by the Division of Medical Policy Programs
`(DMPP) and the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) in response to a
`request by the Division of Hematology Products (DHP) on November 1, 2017 for
`DMPP to review the Applicant’s proposed Patient Package Insert (PPI) for
`IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) capsules, for oral use and IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) tablets,
`for oral use.
`
` MATERIAL REVIEWED
`• Draft IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) capsules and IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) tablets PPI
`received on August 31, 2017, revised by the Review Division throughout the
`review cycle, and received by DMPP and OPDP on January 16, 2018 and
`January 18, 2018.
`• Draft IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) capsules and IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) tablets
`Prescribing Information (PI) received on August 31, 2017, revised by the Review
`Division throughout the review cycle, and received by DMPP and OPDP on
`January 16, 2018 and January 18, 2018.
`• Approved IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) capsules NDA 205552 labeling dated
`December 20, 2017.
`
`
`3 REVIEW METHODS
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4209235
`
`
`
`

`

`To enhance patient comprehension, materials should be written at a 6th to 8th grade
`reading level, and have a reading ease score of at least 60%. A reading ease score of
`60% corresponds to an 8th grade reading level.
`Additionally, in 2008 the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation
`(ASCP) in collaboration with the American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)
`published Guidelines for Prescription Labeling and Consumer Medication
`Information for People with Vision Loss. The ASCP and AFB recommended using
`fonts such as Verdana, Arial or APHont to make medical information more
`accessible for patients with vision loss.
`In collaborative review of the PPI we:
`simplified wording and clarified concepts where possible
`•
`ensured that the PPI is consistent with the Prescribing Information (PI)
`•
`removed unnecessary or redundant information
`•
`ensured that the PPI is free of promotional language or suggested revisions to
`•
`ensure that it is free of promotional language
`ensured that the PPI meets the criteria as specified in FDA’s Guidance for
`Useful Written Consumer Medication Information (published July 2006)
`ensured that the PPI is consistent with the approved labeling where applicable.
`
`•
`
`•
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` CONCLUSIONS
`The PPI is acceptable with our recommended changes.
`
` RECOMMENDATIONS
`• Please send these comments to the Applicant and copy DMPP and OPDP on the
`correspondence.
`• Our collaborative review of the PPI is appended to this memorandum. Consult
`DMPP and OPDP regarding any additional revisions made to the PI to determine
`if corresponding revisions need to be made to the PPI.
` Please let us know if you have any questions.
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4209235
`
`
`
`6 Page(s) of Draft Labeling have been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`SUSAN W REDWOOD
`01/19/2018
`
`NISHA PATEL
`01/19/2018
`
`BARBARA A FULLER
`01/19/2018
`
`Reference ID: 4209235
`
`

`

`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Office of Prescription Drug Promotion
`****Pre-decisional Agency Information****
`
`
`
`
`Memorandum
`
`Date:
`January 19, 2018
`
`
`To:
`
`
`Kelly Miller, Regulatory Project Manager
`Division of Hematology Products (DHP)
`
`Virginia Kwitkowski, Associate Director for Labeling, DHP
`
`Nisha Patel, Regulatory Review Officer
`Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP)
`
`Mathilda Fienkeng, Team Leader, OPDP
`
`
`
`
`From:
`
`
`
`CC:
`
`Subject:
`
`OPDP Labeling Comments for IMBRUVICA® (ibrutinib) capsules, for oral
`use, IMBRUVICA® (ibrutinib) tablets, for oral use
`
`210563
`
`
`NDA:
`
`
`
`In response to DHP’s consult request dated September 15, 2017, OPDP has reviewed the
`proposed product labeling (PI) and patient package insert (PPI) for the original NDA
`submission for IMBRUVICA® (ibrutinib) capsules, for oral use and IMBRUVICA® (ibrutinib)
`tablets, for oral use (Imbruvica).
`
`PI and PPI: OPDP’s comments on the proposed labeling are based on the draft PI emailed to
`OPDP on January 16, 2018, and are provided below.
`
` A
`
` combined OPDP and Division of Medical Policy Programs (DMPP) review was completed,
`and comments on the proposed PPI were sent under separate cover on January 19, 2018.
`
`Thank you for your consult. If you have any questions, please contact Nisha Patel at (301)
`796-3715 or nisha.patel@fda.hhs.gov.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4209411
`
`1
`
`

`

`Statement from draft
`Inform patients to take IMBRUVICA orally
`once daily according to their physician’s
`instructions and that the oral dosage (capsules
`or tablets) should be swallowed whole with a
`glass of water without
`
`approximately the same
`time each day (emphasis added).
`
`
`Comment
`We note that the Dosage and Administration
`section of the full PI states, “Do not open,
`break, or chew the capsules. Do not cut,
`crush, or chew the tablets (emphasis
`added).” OPDP recommends revising the
`Patient Counseling Information section of the
`full PI to include the information above
`regarding tablets.
`
`
`Package Insert
`
`Section
`17 Patient Counseling
`Information
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4209411
`
`2
`
`39 Page(s) of Draft Labeling have been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`NISHA PATEL
`01/19/2018
`
`Reference ID: 4209411
`
`

`

`LABEL AND LABELING REVIEW
`Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA)
`Office of Medication Error Prevention and Risk Management (OMEPRM)
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE)
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
`
`*** This document contains proprietary information that cannot be released to the public***
`
`Date of This Review:
`January 12, 2018
`Requesting Office or Division:
`Division of Hematology Products (DHP)
`Application Type and Number: NDA 210563
`Product Name and Strength:
`Imbruvica (ibrutinib) tablets, 140 mg, 280 mg, 420 mg, and
`560 mg
`Single-Ingredient Product
`Rx
`Pharmacyclics LLC
`August 31, 2017, September 21, 2017 and December 28,
`2017
`2017-1815
`Nicole Garrison, PharmD, BCPS
`Hina Mehta, PharmD
`
`Product Type:
`Rx or OTC:
`Applicant/Sponsor Name:
`Submission Date:
`
`OSE RCM #:
`DMEPA Safety Evaluator:
`DMEPA Team Leader:
`
`Reference ID: 4206614
`
`1
`
`

`

`REASON FOR REVIEW
`1
`This review evaluates the proposed container label, carton labeling, and Prescribing
`Information (PI) for Imbruvica (ibrutinib) tablets, 140 mg, 280 mg, 420 mg, and 560 mg (NDA
`210563) for areas of vulnerability that could lead to medication errors. The Division of
`Hematology Products (DHP) requested this review as a part of their evaluation to the 505(b)(1)
`NDA submission for Imbruvica (ibrutinib) tablets.
`
`1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
`Imbruvica (ibrutinib) capsules NDA 205552 was approved on November 13, 2013 for the
`treatment of patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL). Since its original approval, Imbruvica
`has received additional indications for the treatment of patients with Chronic Lymphocytic
`Leukemia (CLL), Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM), CLL/Small lymphocytic lymphoma
`(SLL), CLL/SLL with 17p deletion, Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL), and Chronic graft versus host
`disease (cGVHD).
`
`Imbruvica capsule 140 mg is currently marketed in the United States. On December 20, 2017,
`the 70 mg capsule was approved to allow for dose reductions in patients with moderate hepatic
`impairment. Depending on the treatment indication, patients may be required to take 3
`capsules (420 mg) or 4 capsules (560 mg) per dose. To reduce the patient pill burden, and
`improve patient’s compliance, the Applicant has proposed a new tablet formulation of
`Imbruvica in four strengths (140 mg, 280 mg, 420 mg, and 560 mg). The tablet formulation is
`intended for the treatment of the same approved indications and the same dose as the
`approved capsule formulation (NDA 205552).
`
`2 MATERIALS REVIEWED
`We considered the materials listed in Table 1 for this review. The Appendices provide the
`methods and results for each material reviewed.
`Table 1. Materials Considered for this Label and Labeling Review
`Appendix Section
`Material Reviewed
`(for Methods and Results)
`A
`B
`C- N/A
`D- N/A
`E- N/A
`F- N/A
`G
`
`Product Information/Prescribing Information
`Previous DMEPA Reviews
`Human Factors Study
`ISMP Newsletters
`FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)*
`Other
`Labels and Labeling
`N/A=not applicable for this review
`
`Reference ID: 4206614
`
`2
`
`

`

`Table 1. Materials Considered for this Label and Labeling Review
`Appendix Section
`Material Reviewed
`(for Methods and Results)
`*We do not typically search FAERS for our label and labeling reviews unless we are aware of
`medication errors through our routine postmarket safety surveillance
`
`3 OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE MATERIALS REVIEWED
`Pharmcyclics submitted a 505 (b)(1) application to obtain marketing approval of Imbruvica
`tablets to reduce patient pill burden and increase patient compliance with therapy. Imbruvica
`tablets will have the same indication and dosing as the currently marketed Imbruvica capsules.
`Imbruvica tablets will be supplied in cartons with blister cards containing 28 tablets.
`
`We performed a risk assessment of the proposed container labels, carton labeling, and PI for
`Imbruvica (ibrutinib) tablets to determine whether there are significant concerns in terms of
`safety, related to preventable medication errors. We identified areas of the proposed labels
`and labeling that could be revised to improve clarity and readability of important information.
`For the proposed labels and labeling, we recommend revising the color scheme of the 280 mg,
`420 mg, and 560 mg strengths, including the package type on the principal display panel (PDP),
`revising the usual dose statement and the product strength statement. For the blister pack
`labeling we recommend deleting
` and revising the cautionary statement.
`For the proposed PI, we recommend revising statements in Section 2 Dosage and
`Administration to provide clarity on administration of the dose.
`
`CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
`4
`DMEPA concludes that the proposed PI, labels and labeling can be improved to increase clarity
`of important information on the labels to promote the safe use of the product. We provide
`recommendations in Section 4.1 and Section 4.2 below and advise that they are implemented
`prior to the approval of this NDA.
`
`4.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE DIVISION
`A. Highlights of Prescribing Information
`1. Dosage and Administration
`a.Revise the statement,
` To “Dose should be taken orally with a glass of water.”
`b.Revise the statement,
` To “Do not
`cut, crush, or chew the tablets.”
`B. Full Prescribing Information
`1. Dosage and Administration
`a.Section 2.1, Dosing Guidelines
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4206614
`
`3
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`i.
`
`ii.
`
`
`Revise the statement,
` to “The dose should be taken orally
`with a glass of water.”
`See A.1.b and revise the full prescribing information
`accordingly.
`
`4.2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PHARMCYCLICS
`We recommend the following be implemented prior to approval of this NDA:
`A. Carton labeling
`1. There is inadequate differentiation between the font color of the proprietary
`name
` and the color scheme of the 280 mg and 560 mg strengths
`
`. Revise the color scheme of the 280 mg and 560 mg strengths
`, so that either strength appears in its own unique color and the color does
`not overlap with any other colors utilized in highlighting the strengths. The use
`of the same
` color font for the proprietary name and one for the product’s
`strength minimizes the difference between the strengths, which may lead to
`wrong strength selection errors.
`2. There is inadequate differentiation between the 140 mg capsule strength
`and the 420 mg tablet strength
`). Revise the color scheme of
`the 420 mg tablet strength
` so that it appears in its own unique
`color and the color does not overlap with any other colors utilized in highlighting
`the strengths. The use of the same
` color scheme for the product’s 140 mg
`capsule and 420 mg tablet strengths minimizes the difference between the
`strengths, which may lead to wrong strength selection errors.
`3. The package type (wallet card) is omitted from Principal Display Panel (PDP).
`Revise the PDP to include the net quantity with the package type as follows:
`
`
`
`“Wallet card contains 28 tablets”
`
`4. Revise the usual dose statement from
`“Dosage: See prescribing information” in accordance with 21 CFR 201.55.
`5. Revise the product strength on the PDP to state the total product strength (e.g.
`560 mg per tablet).
`6. Revise the statement,
`or chew the tablets.” to prevent confusion.
`
` To “Do not cut, crush,
`
` to
`
`A. Blister pack labeling
`1. We recommend deleting
`
`. We recommend this revision to prevent delays in dosing.
`2. For each strength of Imbruvica tablets, revise the cautionary statement,
`
`
`
`
`
`
` to
`
`4
`
`Reference ID: 4206614
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`“Every tablet is identical and contains (include the total amount [e.g. 560 mg]) of
`Imbruvica per tablet”
`
`Reference ID: 4206614
`
`5
`
`

`

`APPENDICES: METHODS & RESULTS FOR EACH MATERIALS REVIEWED
`
`Imbruvica tablets
`N/A
`
`APPENDIX A. PRODUCT INFORMATION/PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
`Table 2 presents relevant product information for Imbruvica that Pharmacyclics submitted on
`August 31, 2017 and December 28, 2017.
`Table 2. Relevant Product Information for Imbruvica
`Imbruvica capsules
`Product Name
`November 13, 2013
`Initial Approval Date
`Ibrutinib
`Active Ingredient
`Imbruvica is indicated for the treatment of patients with:
`Indication
` Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have received at least one
`prior therapy
` Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/Small lymphocytic
`lymphoma (SLL)
` Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/Small lymphocytic
`lymphoma (SLL) with 17p deletion
` Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (WM)
` Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) for patients who require
`systemic therapy and have received at least one prior anti-
`CD20-based therapy.
` Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) after failure of
`one or more lines of systemic therapy.
`
`Oral
`
`Capsules
`Capsules: 70 mg and 140 mg
`
`Tablets
`Tablets: 140 mg, 280 mg, 420
`mg, and 560 mg
`Dose and Frequency MCL and LZL: 560 mg taken orally once daily
`CLL/SLL, WM, and cGVHD: 420 mg taken orally once daily
`
`
`70 mg capsules (28
`140 mg tablets (28
`capsules per bottle)
`tablets per carton)
`140 mg capsules (90 and
`280 mg tablets (28
`120 capsules per bottle)
`tablets per carton)
`420 mg tablets (28
`tablets per carton)
`560 mg tablets (28
`tablets per carton)
`Store tablets in original
`packaging at room
`temperature 20°C to
`
`Route of
`Administration
`Dosage Form
`Strength
`
`How Supplied
`
`Storage
`
`
`
`
`
`Store bottles at room
`temperature 20°C to
`25°C (68°F to 77°F).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4206614
`
`6
`
`

`

`Container Closure
`
`Excursions are permitted
`between 15°C and 30°C
`(59°F to 86°F). Retain in
`original package until
`dispensing.
` White HDPE bottles with
`a child-resistant closure
`
`25°C (68°F to 77°F).
`Excursions are permitted
`between 15°C and 30°C
`(59°F to 86°F).
`
` Carton of one folded
`blister card containing
`two 14-count blister
`strips for a total of 28
`tablets
`
`Reference ID: 4206614
`
`7
`
`

`

`APPENDIX B. PREVIOUS DMEPA REVIEWS
`On December 29, 2017, we searched DMEPA’s previous reviews using the terms, Imbruvica.
`Our search identified four labeling reviewsa,b,c,d and one post marketing reviewe, and we
`confirmed that our previous recommendations were implemented.
`
`a Rahimi, L. Label and Labeling Review for Imbruvica NDA 205552/S-002. Silver Spring (MD): FDA, CDER, OSE,
`DMEPA (US); 2014 JAN 12. RCM No.: 2014-2236.
`b Garrison, N. Label and Labeling Review for Imbruvica NDA 205552/S-016. Silver Spring (MD): FDA, CDER, OSE,
`DMEPA (US); 2016 NOV 02. RCM No.: 2016-2187.
`c Garrison, N. Label and Labeling Review for Imbruvica NDA 205552/S-20. Silver Spring (MD): FDA, CDER, OSE,
`DMEPA (US); 2017 NOV 08. RCM No.: 2017-1565.
`d Garrison, N. Label and Labeling Review Memorandum for Imbruvica NDA 205552/S-20. Silver Spring (MD): FDA,
`CDER, OSE, DMEPA (US); 2017 DEC 01. RCM No.: 2017-1565-1.
`e Ayres, E. Postmarket Signal Work for Imbruvica NDA 205552. Silver Spring (MD): FDA, CDER, OSE, DMEPA (US);
`22015 DEC 18. RCM No.: 2015-2548.
`
`8
`
`Reference ID: 4206614
`
`

`

`APPENDIX G. LABELS AND LABELING
`G.1
`List of Labels and Labeling Reviewed
`Using the principles of human factors and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis,f along with
`postmarket medication error data, we reviewed the following Imbruvica labels and labeling
`submitted by Pharmacyclics on August 31, 2017, September 21, 2017 and December 28, 2017.
`
` Container labels and Carton labeling
`
`Prescribing Information
`
`G.2
`
`Label and Labeling Images
`
`Container labels and Carton labeling
`
`f Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. Boston. IHI:2004.
`
`Reference ID: 4206614
`
`9
`
`8 Page(s) of Draft Labeling have been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`NICOLE B GARRISON
`01/12/2018
`
`HINA S MEHTA
`01/12/2018
`
`Reference ID: 4206614
`
`

`

`M E M O R A N D U M
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`DATE:
`
`TO:
`
`
`
`
`
`FROM:
`
`
`
`12/1/2017
`
`Division of Hematology Products
`Office of Hermatology and Oncology Products
`
`Division of New Drug Bioequivalence Evaluation (DNDBE)
`Office of Study Integrity and Surveillance (OSIS)
`
`SUBJECT: Recommendation to accept data without an on-site inspection
`
`RE:
`
`NDA 210563
`
`The Division of New Drug Bioequivalence Evaluation (DNDBE) within the Office of Study Integrity
`and Surveillance (OSIS) recommends accepting data without an on-site inspection. The rationale for
`this decision is noted below.
`
`
`
`Rationale
`
`OSIS recently inspected the sites listed below. The inspectional outcomes of the inspections were
`classified as No Action Indicated (NAI). Although the bioanalytical study reports were not provided
`, the clinical portions of the current studies concluded between January and
`November 2016. Therefore, OSIS infers that the bioanalytical portions of the current studies were
`conducted around that time (Jan – Nov 2016) and that the previously inspected studies were conducted
`within approximately one to two years of the bioanalytical portion of the current studies.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inspection Sites
`
`
`
`Facility Type
`
`Facility Name
`
`Facility Address
`
`Analytical
`
`Clinical
`
`Celerion
`
`2420 West Baseline Road, Tempe, AZ
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4189398
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`M E M O R A N D U M
`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`DATE:
`
`TO:
`
`
`
`
`
`FROM:
`
`
`
`11/29/2017
`
`Division of Hematology Products
`Office of Hermatology and Oncology Products
`
`Division of New Drug Bioequivalence Evaluation (DNDBE)
`Office of Study Integrity and Surveillance (OSIS)
`
`SUBJECT: Decline to Inspect Mamo
`
`RE:
`
`NDA 210563
`
`The Division of New Drug Bioequivalence Evaluation (DNDBE) within the Office of Study Integrity
`and Surveillance (OSIS) recommends accepting data without an on-site inspection. The rationale for
`this decision is noted below.
`
`
`
`Rationale
`
`OSIS has no inspection history for Janssen-Cilag International, however, an inspection of the site can
`not be conducted because the requested review goal date of February 28, 2018 provides insufficient
`time for the inspection to be completed to meet that goal date.
`
`
`
`Inspection Site
`
`
`
`Facility Type
`
`Facility Name
`
`Facility Address
`
`Clinical
`
`Janssen-Cilag International N.V.
`
`Janssen Research and Development
`Pharmacology Unit, Merksem, Lange
`Bremstraat 70, B-2170 Antwerpen,
`Belgium.
`
`Reference ID: 4189398
`
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`SHILA S NKAH
`12/01/2017
`
`Reference ID: 4189398
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket