throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`
`209472Orig1s000
`
`
`CLINICAL REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`File Memorandum
`
`
`Memo Date
`
`To NDA
`
`Submission Date
`PDFUA Date
`Product
`Dosage Form
`
`Sponsor
`From
`Via
`
`Reference Drug
`
`10/4/2019
`209472
`8/9/2019
`10/9/2019
`Pemfexy (Pemetrexed for Injection) Ready to Dilute Solution
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`500 mg vial for injection, (25 mg/mL)
`
`
`
`Eagle Pharmaceuticals
`
`Barb Scepura
` Erin Larkins, MD, Clinical Team Leader, DOP2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Alimta (NDA 021677and 021462)
`
`
`
`
`Clinical Information
`
`
`
`No clinical data was submitted in this application.
`
`Background
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This is a 505(b) (2) application by Eagle Pharmaceuticals. Eagle Pharmaceuticals is proposing a proprietary name
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for their product Pemfexy (Pemetrexed for Injection). The reference drug product is Eli Lilly and Company’s Alimta
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(pemetrexed disodium) for injection (NDAs 021677 and 021462). Alimta was initially granted traditional approval
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`on February 4, 2004. Eagle Pharmaceuticals Pemfexy (Pemetrexed for Injection) will have the same indications as
`Alimta.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Eagle”) requests a waiver of in vivo bioavailability studies to demonstrate the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bioequivalence of Eagle’s Ready-to-Dilute (RTD) aqueous solution formulation of Pemetrexed Injection, 25
`
`
`
`mg/mL, to the listed drug Alimta.
`
`Labeling
`
`Please refer to the review by Associate Director for Labeling for details.
`
`
`
`Summary of Findings
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No clinical safety or efficacy data were submitted in this NDA application.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`An Initial Pediatric Study Plan was submitted under IND 126831, with agreement on October 14, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`Additional Background Information
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Clinical studies have not been performed using Eagle’s PEMFEXY product. The prepared Eagle PEMFEXY product
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`contains relatively high levels of propylene glycol (PG), which are not present in the reference
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4500363Reference ID: 4553588
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drug ALIMTA. Although PG is generally considered safe, potential toxicity concerns with infusion of high levels of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PG are renal, cardiac, neurologic, metabolic and hematologic.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Potential Safety Issues Related to PG
` Hemolysis related to osmolality.
`
`
`o The Applicant submitted a toxicology study which demonstrated no safety concern for this
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`product.
`o Please refer to CMC review for details.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lactic acidosis and renal toxicity reported with cumulative doses.
`
`o Clinical reports of lactic acidosis and renal toxicity associated with PG have been in the setting of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cumulative exposure over time, mostly associated with continuous infusions over multiple days
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of drug products containing PG as an excipient. A 2014 report from the European Medicines
`
` Agency (EMA) regarding the use of PG as an excipient1 cites the report by Speth et al2 for a dose
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` escalation study of mitoquidone, in which the drug product had PG as an excipient. in this study,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` patients with cancer received PG at doses of up to 15 g/m2 as a 4-hour IV infusion once every 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` weeks. This resulted in Cmax exposures as high as 425 g/mL (42.5 mg/dL). There was no
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` evidence of lactic acidosis or associated renal toxicity in this study.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`o The following information is contained in the Nonclinical Review for this application: “On a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` mg/m2 basis humans would receive no more than approximately 8 g/m2 delivered during the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` recommended 10-minute infusion at the maximum anticipated level of 15.6 g, though a more
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` likely high dose would be no more than approximately 10 g, or 5.5 g/m2, based on typical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` calculations using an average BSA of 1.8 m2 rather than 3”.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Reviewer comment: The anticipated maximum dose of 8 g/m2 is well below the highest dose of 15 g/m2 PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` administered in the Speth trial. Given this, and the once every 3-week dosing of PEMFEXY, lactic acidosis and renal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` toxicity due to PG are not expected to be associated with use of this product.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`  Cardiovascular effects with “rapid infusions”
`
`o As referenced by the Applicant in a September 28, 2017 response to information request from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the FDA, the 2014 EMA report cites several publications describing cardiovascular effects of PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at different dose levels in nonclinical studies. One study from the mid-1970s reports
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`antiarrhythmic effects observed in rats and dogs following IV injection of PG at doses between
` 193 to 289 mg/kg.3 Another study from the mid-1980s specifically evaluated the cardiovascular
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` effects of PG administered to dogs as an IV injection at doses of 160, 400, and 800 mg/kg.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Results from this second study showed transient decrease in heart rate and blood pressure at a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dose ≥400 mg/kg, with values returning to normal within 1 minute of PG administration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reviewer comment: These reports from nonclinical studies are for PG administered as an injection. PEMFEXY is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`recommended to be administered as an IV infusion over 10 minutes. Literature searches performed by the clinical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reviewer and the clinical team lead revealed no clinical case reports of sudden death clearly or likely related to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`receipt of propylene glycol as an excipient.
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4500363Reference ID: 4553588
`
`

`

`
`
`
` EMA Statement on PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` The 2014 EMA report regarding PG as an excipient concludes “the safe maximum daily dose of PG for adults is
`
`
`
`
`
` 500 mg /kg”. 1 In a letter dated October 2, 2017 Eagle Pharmaceuticals confirmed that the maximum level of PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` to be delivered at the maximum expected pemetrexed dose of 1500 mg is 15.6 g, which is equivalent to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`approximately 222 mg/kg, which is less than half the maximum daily dose considered safe for adults per the EMA
`report.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FDA Statement on PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The FDA Inactive Ingredient Database (IID) for Drug Products includes a maximum potency of 30% for propylene
` glycol administered as an administered as an intravenous infusion.5 The anticipated maximum potency of PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Pemetrexed Injection for the expected highest total dose of 1,500 mg of pemetrexed, administered IV as a 100­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` mL admixture over a 10-minute infusion to a very large patient with 3 m2 BSA, is 15.6%. This potency of 15.6% is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` approximately 50% lower than the IID-allowed maximum potency for an IV infusion (30%), and approximately
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` one fifth of the maximum potency IID-allowed for an IV
`
`
`
`injection (82.04%).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Reviewer comment: The dose of PG in Eagle’s prepared PEMFEXY product is within the safety limits defined by
` both the FDA and the EMA.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Reviewer comment: Based on biopharmaceutical review, nonclinical assessment and literature references, Eagle’s
`
` prepared PEMFEXY product contains safe levels of PG.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`References
`
`
`
`1. European Medicines Agency. Background review for the excipient propylene glycol. November 20, 2014,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`available at:
`
`http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en GB/document library/Report/2014/12/WC500177937.pdf
`
`
`
`
`Accessed on September 28, 2017.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. Speth P and Vree T. Propylene glycol pharmacokinetics and effects after intravenous infusion in humans.
`
`
`
`
`Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1987, 9:255-258.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3. Eichbaum FW and Yasaka WJ. Antiarrhythmic effect of solvents: propylene glycol, benzyl alcohol. Basic
`
`
`
`Res Cardiology, 1976, 71:355-370.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4. Al-Khudhairi D and Whitman JG. Autonomic reflexes and the cardiovascular effects of propylene glycol.
`
`
`Br J Anaesth, 1986, 58:897-902.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5. U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Inactive Ingredient Search for Approved Drug Products. Available at:
`https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/iig/getiigWEB.cfm
`
`
`
`Accessed on October 3, 2017.
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4500363Reference ID: 4553588
`
`

`

`Signature Page 1 of 1
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically. Following this are manifestations of any and all
`electronic signatures for this electronic record.
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`------------------------------------------------------------
`
`BARBARA A SCEPURA
`10/02/2019 11:06:04 AM
`
`ERIN A LARKINS
`10/02/2019 12:20:53 PM
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4500363Reference ID: 4553588
`
`

`

`Signature Page 1 of 1
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically. Following this are manifestations of any and all
`electronic signatures for this electronic record.
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`------------------------------------------------------------
`
`BARBARA A SCEPURA
`01/29/2020 12:38:09 PM
`
`Reference ID: 4553588
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`
`
`Cross-Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`
`Date
`From
`Subject
`NDA
`Type of Application
`Applicant
`Date of Receipt
`
`PDUFA Goal Date
`Proposed
`
`Proprietary/Established Name
`Dosage forms / Strength
`Route of Administration
`Proposed Indication(s)
`
`Recommended:
`
`October 03, 2019
`Anamitro Banerjee, Ph.D.
`Cross-Discipline Team Leader Review
`2084742
`505(b)(2)
`Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`August 09, 2019 (original submission: (December 30,
`2016)
`October 09, 2019
`PEMFEXY (pemetrexed injection)
`
`Injection/ 25 mg/mL (500 mg/vial)
`Intravenous injection
`Pemetrexed for injection is a folate analog metabolic
`inhibitor indicated for:
`• Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-
`Small Cell Lung Cancer:
`• Initial treatment in combination with cisplatin.
`• Maintenance treatment of patients whose disease has
`not progressed after four cycles of platinum-based
`first-line chemotherapy.
`• After prior chemotherapy as a single-agent.
`•Mesothelioma: in combination with cisplatin.
`
`TENTATIVE APPROVAL
`
`This cross-discipline team leader review is based on the primary reviews, memos and documented
`review input of:
`
` Product Quality (Xing Wang), dated October 03, 2019
`
` Clinical (Barbara Scepura); in DARRTS, dated October 02, 2019
`
` Pharmacology/Toxicology (M. Anwar Goheer, NAI); in DARRTS, dated September 30,
`2019
`
` Pharmacology/Toxicology Labeling Review (Whitney Helms); in DARRTS, dated October
`04, 2019
`
`
` Clinical Labeling Review (Stacy Shord); in DARRTS, dated October 04, 2019
`
`
` OPDP (Susan Redwood), dated September 27, 2019
`
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4502319
`
`1
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`
`
` OPDP (Fatima Nazia), dated September 26, 2019
`
` Clinical Pharmacology (Safaa Burns), dated October 02, 2019
`
` 1. Introduction
`
`
`
`
` The proposed Pemetrexed (as diacid) for Injection is a sterile single dose ready to dilute solution
`
` with a concentration of 25 mg/mL (500 mg/vial), intended for IV use. The solution is further
` diluted with 5% Dextrose in Water to a maximum of final pemetrexed concentration of 15 mg/mL
`
`prior to administration. The submission is a 505(b)(2) application, referencing the lyophilized
`
`
`formulation, Alimta (NDA 021462). The listed drug (LD) Alimta is available in 100 mg and 500
`
`
`
`
`mg single dose vials. The therapeutic active moiety (pemetrexed), route of administration
`
`
`of the proposed drug product is identical to the listed rug product. However, the listed and
`
`
`
`the proposed drug product differ in salt form of the active moiety, excipients, dosage form, and the
`solution for dilution. In support of the equivalence of the LD and the proposed drug product, the
`
`
`applicant provided comparative physicochemical properties and a bio-waiver request. Clinical data
`
`
`
`was not submitted in the application. Other than the pemetrexed in disodium salt form, Alimta
`contains mannitol, and hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide for pH adjustment
`
`
`Alimta is
`
`reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride injection solution followed by further dilution prior to
`
`administration. The proposed drug product contains pemetrexed (as diacid), propylene glycol as
`
`
`
`stabilizer, tromethamine and hydrocholic acid as pH adjusters, and water for injection
`
`The proposed Eagle product may be diluted with 5% Dextrose Injection while the
`
`LD may only be diluted with 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection.
`
`
`2. Background
`The current application relies on the Agency’s determination of human safety and efficacy for the
`
`pemetrexed lyophilized powder for injection (Alimta), which has been previously approved for
`marketing under NDA 021462 and NDA 021677.
`
`This NDA was given a tentative approval on October 26, 2017. In this resubmission, the applicant
`
`
`
`
`is seeking full approval of the ready to dilute solution of pemetrexed ditromethamine for the same
`indication granted for Alimta. Alimta is indicated for the initial treatment of nonsquamous non-
`
`
`small cell lung cancer in combination with cisplatin, as a single agent treatment for nonsquamous
`
`
`
`
`non-small cell lung cancer after prior chemotherapy, and for the treatment of mesothelioma in
`
`combination with cisplatin.
`
`3. Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC)
` Labeling and strength
`The drug substance for NDA 208472 is pemetrexed diacid
`, consistent with the listed product, Alimta.
`designation is on the basis of the pemetrexed
`
`Chemical Name: (4-(2-(2-amino-4-oxo-4,7-dihydro-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-5­
`yl)ethyl)benzoyl)-L-glutamic acid.
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4502319
`
`2
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`
`
`N 3
`2
`
`O
`
`4
`
`1
`N
`H
`
`H2N
`
`1
`
`2
`
`6
`
`5
`
`N
`7
`H
`
`34
`5
`
`6
`
`2
`1
`
`CO2H
`
`H
`N
`
`S
`L
`
`O
`
`HO2C
`(4-(2-(2-amino-4-oxo-4,7-dihydro-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-5-yl)ethyl)benzoyl)-L­
`glutamic acid
`
`Chemical Formula: C20H21N5O6
`
`Molecular Weight: 427.4170
`
`The applicant did not provide any new CMC information in this resubmission. No CMC
`deficiencies were identified in the previous review cycle.
`
`
`Overall CMC recommendation
`The Office of Pharmaceutical Quality recommendation remains APPROVAL action for NDA
`208472.
`
`4. Pharmacology/Toxicology
`No new information provided in this resubmission
`
`5. Clinical
`No clinical safety or efficacy data were submitted in this NDA application.
`
`6. Clinical Pharmacology
`This NDA does not contain any clinical or clinical pharmacology studies as the Applicant requested
`a biowaiver. No new information submitted in this resubmission.
`
`7. Advisory Committee Meeting
`
`
`N/A
`
`9. Other Relevant Regulatory Issues
`The application may not be approved for marketing until patent/s for the listed drug expires or the
`current patent infringement lawsuit is settled.
`
`10. Labeling
`The applicant updated the label as suggested by the review team. The label is now acceptable.
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4502319
`
`3
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`
`
`14. Recommendations/Risk Benefit Assessment
`
` Recommended Regulatory Action
`
`This drug product differs with the listed drug, Alimta, in the salt form of active moiety and in the
`composition of the product. No clinical studies were conducted to assure safety and efficacy and a
`
`bio-waiver request will be granted for this 505(b)(2) application when it can be approved. The cross
`disciplinary team lead recommendation is for a Tentative Approval for this NDA. The drug
`product may not be approved for marketing until pertinent patents for the listed drug “Alimta”
`expire or the current patent infringement lawsuit is settled in Eagles’s favor.
`
` Risk Benefit Assessment
`Please refer to NDA 021462
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4502319
`
`4
`
`

`

`Signature Page 1 of 1
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically. Following this are manifestations of any and all
`electronic signatures for this electronic record.
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`------------------------------------------------------------
`
`ANAMITRO BANERJEE
`10/04/2019 04:36:56 PM
`
`Reference ID: 4502319
`
`

`

`
`File Memorandum
`
`
`Memo Date
`
`To NDA
`
`Submission Date
`PDFUA Date
`Product
`Dosage Form
`
`Sponsor
`From
`Via
`
`Reference Drug
`
`10/4/2019
`209472
`8/9/2019
`10/9/2019
`Pemfexy (Pemetrexed for Injection) Ready to Dilute Solution
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`500 mg vial for injection, (25 mg/mL)
`
`
`
`Eagle Pharmaceuticals
`
`Barb Scepura
` Erin Larkins, MD, Clinical Team Leader, DOP2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Alimta (NDA 021677and 021462)
`
`
`
`
`Clinical Information
`
`
`
`No clinical data was submitted in this application.
`
`Background
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This is a 505(b) (2) application by Eagle Pharmaceuticals. Eagle Pharmaceuticals is proposing a proprietary name
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for their product Pemfexy (Pemetrexed for Injection). The reference drug product is Eli Lilly and Company’s Alimta
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(pemetrexed disodium) for injection (NDAs 021677 and 021462). Alimta was initially granted traditional approval
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`on February 4, 2004. Eagle Pharmaceuticals Pemfexy (Pemetrexed for Injection) will have the same indications as
`Alimta.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Eagle”) requests a waiver of in vivo bioavailability studies to demonstrate the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bioequivalence of Eagle’s Ready-to-Dilute (RTD) aqueous solution formulation of Pemetrexed Injection, 25
`
`
`
`mg/mL, to the listed drug Alimta.
`
`Labeling
`
`Please refer to the review by Associate Director for Labeling for details.
`
`
`
`Summary of Findings
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No clinical safety or efficacy data were submitted in this NDA application.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`An Initial Pediatric Study Plan was submitted under IND 126831, with agreement on October 14, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`Additional Background Information
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Clinical studies have not been performed using Eagle’s PEMFEXY product. The prepared Eagle PEMFEXY product
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`contains relatively high levels of propylene glycol (PG), which are not present in the reference
`
`Reference ID: 4500363
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drug ALIMTA. Although PG is generally considered safe, potential toxicity concerns with infusion of high levels of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PG are renal, cardiac, neurologic, metabolic and hematologic.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Potential Safety Issues Related to PG
` Hemolysis related to osmolality.
`
`
`o The Applicant submitted a toxicology study which demonstrated no safety concern for this
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`product.
`o Please refer to CMC review for details.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lactic acidosis and renal toxicity reported with cumulative doses.
`
`o Clinical reports of lactic acidosis and renal toxicity associated with PG have been in the setting of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cumulative exposure over time, mostly associated with continuous infusions over multiple days
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of drug products containing PG as an excipient. A 2014 report from the European Medicines
`
` Agency (EMA) regarding the use of PG as an excipient1 cites the report by Speth et al2 for a dose
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` escalation study of mitoquidone, in which the drug product had PG as an excipient. in this study,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` patients with cancer received PG at doses of up to 15 g/m2 as a 4-hour IV infusion once every 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` weeks. This resulted in Cmax exposures as high as 425 g/mL (42.5 mg/dL). There was no
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` evidence of lactic acidosis or associated renal toxicity in this study.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`o The following information is contained in the Nonclinical Review for this application: “On a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` mg/m2 basis humans would receive no more than approximately 8 g/m2 delivered during the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` recommended 10-minute infusion at the maximum anticipated level of 15.6 g, though a more
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` likely high dose would be no more than approximately 10 g, or 5.5 g/m2, based on typical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` calculations using an average BSA of 1.8 m2 rather than 3”.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Reviewer comment: The anticipated maximum dose of 8 g/m2 is well below the highest dose of 15 g/m2 PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` administered in the Speth trial. Given this, and the once every 3-week dosing of PEMFEXY, lactic acidosis and renal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` toxicity due to PG are not expected to be associated with use of this product.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`  Cardiovascular effects with “rapid infusions”
`
`o As referenced by the Applicant in a September 28, 2017 response to information request from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the FDA, the 2014 EMA report cites several publications describing cardiovascular effects of PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at different dose levels in nonclinical studies. One study from the mid-1970s reports
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`antiarrhythmic effects observed in rats and dogs following IV injection of PG at doses between
` 193 to 289 mg/kg.3 Another study from the mid-1980s specifically evaluated the cardiovascular
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` effects of PG administered to dogs as an IV injection at doses of 160, 400, and 800 mg/kg.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Results from this second study showed transient decrease in heart rate and blood pressure at a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dose ≥400 mg/kg, with values returning to normal within 1 minute of PG administration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reviewer comment: These reports from nonclinical studies are for PG administered as an injection. PEMFEXY is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`recommended to be administered as an IV infusion over 10 minutes. Literature searches performed by the clinical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reviewer and the clinical team lead revealed no clinical case reports of sudden death clearly or likely related to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`receipt of propylene glycol as an excipient.
`
`Reference ID: 4500363
`
`

`

`
`
`
` EMA Statement on PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` The 2014 EMA report regarding PG as an excipient concludes “the safe maximum daily dose of PG for adults is
`
`
`
`
`
` 500 mg /kg”. 1 In a letter dated October 2, 2017 Eagle Pharmaceuticals confirmed that the maximum level of PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` to be delivered at the maximum expected pemetrexed dose of 1500 mg is 15.6 g, which is equivalent to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`approximately 222 mg/kg, which is less than half the maximum daily dose considered safe for adults per the EMA
`report.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FDA Statement on PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The FDA Inactive Ingredient Database (IID) for Drug Products includes a maximum potency of 30% for propylene
` glycol administered as an administered as an intravenous infusion.5 The anticipated maximum potency of PG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Pemetrexed Injection for the expected highest total dose of 1,500 mg of pemetrexed, administered IV as a 100­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` mL admixture over a 10-minute infusion to a very large patient with 3 m2 BSA, is 15.6%. This potency of 15.6% is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` approximately 50% lower than the IID-allowed maximum potency for an IV infusion (30%), and approximately
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` one fifth of the maximum potency IID-allowed for an IV
`
`
`
`injection (82.04%).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Reviewer comment: The dose of PG in Eagle’s prepared PEMFEXY product is within the safety limits defined by
` both the FDA and the EMA.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Reviewer comment: Based on biopharmaceutical review, nonclinical assessment and literature references, Eagle’s
`
` prepared PEMFEXY product contains safe levels of PG.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`References
`
`
`
`1. European Medicines Agency. Background review for the excipient propylene glycol. November 20, 2014,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`available at:
`
`http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en GB/document library/Report/2014/12/WC500177937.pdf
`
`
`
`
`Accessed on September 28, 2017.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. Speth P and Vree T. Propylene glycol pharmacokinetics and effects after intravenous infusion in humans.
`
`
`
`
`Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1987, 9:255-258.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3. Eichbaum FW and Yasaka WJ. Antiarrhythmic effect of solvents: propylene glycol, benzyl alcohol. Basic
`
`
`
`Res Cardiology, 1976, 71:355-370.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4. Al-Khudhairi D and Whitman JG. Autonomic reflexes and the cardiovascular effects of propylene glycol.
`
`
`Br J Anaesth, 1986, 58:897-902.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5. U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Inactive Ingredient Search for Approved Drug Products. Available at:
`https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/iig/getiigWEB.cfm
`
`
`
`Accessed on October 3, 2017.
`
`Reference ID: 4500363
`
`

`

`Signature Page 1 of 1
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically. Following this are manifestations of any and all
`electronic signatures for this electronic record.
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`------------------------------------------------------------
`
`BARBARA A SCEPURA
`10/02/2019 11:06:04 AM
`
`ERIN A LARKINS
`10/02/2019 12:20:53 PM
`
`Reference ID: 4500363
`
`

`

`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`MEMORANDUM
`
`Date:
`
`January 22, 2018
`
`From: Autumn Zack-Taylor, M.S., Regulatory Health Project Manager
`DOP2/0HOP/CDER
`
`Subject: Financial Disclosure Review
`
`Financial disclosures were not required for review of this application because there were no
`clinical studies submitted supporting the application.
`
`Reference ID: 4662511
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`
`
`Cross-Discipline Team Leader Memo
`
`
`Date
`From
`Subject
`NDA
`Type of Application
`Applicant
`Date of Receipt
`PDUFA Goal Date
`Proposed
`
`Proprietary/Established Name
`Dosage forms / Strength
`Route of Administration
`Proposed Indication(s)
`
`Recommended:
`
`October 26, 2017
`Okpo Eradiri, Ph.D.
`Cross-Discipline Team Leader Review
`209472
`505(b)(2)
`Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`December 30, 2016
`October 30, 2017
`PEMFEXY (pemetrexed injection)
`
`Injection/ 25 mg/mL (500 mg/vial)
`Intravenous injection
`Pemetrexed for injection is a folate analog metabolic
`inhibitor indicated for:
`• Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-
`Small Cell Lung Cancer:
`• Initial treatment in combination with cisplatin.
`• Maintenance treatment of patients whose disease has
`not progressed after four cycles of platinum-based
`first-line chemotherapy.
`• After prior chemotherapy as a single-agent.
`•Mesothelioma: in combination with cisplatin.
`TENTATIVE APPROVAL
`
`This cross-discipline team leader review is based on the primary reviews, memos and documented
`review input of:
`
` Drug Substance (Haripada Sarker), dated September 18, 2017
`
` Drug Product (Xing Wang), dated September 05, 2017
`
` Microbiology (Denise Miller), dated July 28, 2017
`
` Manufacturing Facilities (Wenzheng Zhang), dated September 28, 2017
`
` Manufacturing Process (Zhaoyang Meng), dated August 28, 2017
`
` Biopharmaceutics (Zhuojun Zhao), dated August 24, 2017
`
` Clinical (Barbara Scepura); in DARRTS, dated October 20, 2017
`
` Pharmacology/Toxicology (M. Anwar Goheer); in DARRTS, dated October 03, 2017
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`Reference ID: 4172494
`
`1
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`
`
` Patient Labeling (Susan Redwood); in DARRTS, dated October 20, 2017
`
` Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (Janine Stewart), dated October 25, 2017
`
` 1. Introduction
`
` The proposed Pemetrexed (as diacid) for Injection is a sterile single dose ready to dilute solution
`
`
`
`
` with a concentration of 25 mg/mL (500 mg/vial), intended for IV use. The solution is further diluted
`with 5% Dextrose in Water to a maximum final pemetrexed concentration of 15 mg/mL prior to
`administration. The submission is a 505(b)(2) application, referencing the lyophilized
`
`
`formulation, Alimta (NDA 021462). The listed drug (LD), Alimta, is available in 100 mg and 500
`
`mg single dose vials. The therapeutic active moiety (pemetrexed), route of administration
`
`
`
`of the proposed drug product are identical to the listed drug product. However, the listed
`
`and the proposed drug products differ in salt form of the active moiety, excipients, dosage form, and
`
`
`
`
`
`the solution for dilution. In support of the equivalence of the LD and the proposed drug product, the
`
`applicant provided comparative physicochemical properties and a bio-waiver request. Clinical data
`
`
`were not submitted in the application. Other than the pemetrexed in disodium salt form, Alimta
`
`contains mannitol and hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide for pH adjustmen
`
`
`
`Alimta is
`reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride injection solution followed by further dilution prior to
`
`administration. The proposed drug product contains pemetrexed (as diacid), propylene glycol as
`
`stabilizer, tromethamine and hydrochloric acid as pH adjusters, and water for injection
`
`. The proposed Eagle product may be diluted with 5% Dextrose Injection while the
`
`
`
`LD may only be diluted with 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection.
`
`
`2. Background
`The current application relies on the Agency’s determination of human safety and efficacy for the
`
`pemetrexed lyophilized powder for injection (Alimta), which has been previously approved for
`marketing under NDA 021462 and NDA 021677; Alimta was granted traditional approval on
`
`
`February 4, 2004.
`
`The applicant is seeking approval of a ready to dilute solution of pemetrexed ditromethamine for the
`same indications granted for Alimta. Alimta is indicated for the initial treatment of nonsquamous
`
`non-small cell lung cancer in combination with cisplatin, as a single agent treatment for
`
`
`
`nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer after prior chemotherapy, and for the treatment of
`
`mesothelioma in combination with cisplatin.
`
`3. Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC)
`). Labeling and strength
`The drug substance for NDA 208472 is pemetrexed diacid
`designation are based on the pemetrexed
`, consistent with the listed product, Alimta.
`Chemical Name: (4-(2-(2-amino-4-oxo-4,7-dihydro-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-5­
`yl)ethyl)benzoyl)-L-glutamic acid.
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`Reference ID: 4172494
`
`2
`
`(b)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket