throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`208745Orig1s000
`
`PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`MEMORANDUM
`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`FROM: David B. Joseph
`Lead Pharmacologist
`
`DATE: December 2, 2016
`
`SUBJECT: NDA 208,745 (SD # 1 dated January 29, 2016)
`
`Sponsor: Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Drug Product: TRULANCE (plecanatide) tablets
`
`Comments:
`
`There are no nonclinical issues which preclude the approval of Trulance. I concur with
`the recommendations related to approvability, stated in the Pharmacology/Toxicology
`review by Dr. Yuk-Chow Ng. The final revisions to nonclinical information in labeling
`subsections 5.1, 8.1, 8.4, 12.1, and 13.1 include minor changes from the recommended
`version in Dr. Ng’s review. The additional labeling revisions were developed through
`collaboration of the nonclinical team with other members of the review team.
`
` __________________________________ ____________
`
`David B. Joseph, PhD Date
` Lead Pharmacologist
`Division of Gastroenterology and Inborn Errors Products
`
`cc:
`NDA 208,745
`DGIEP
`DGIEP/PM
`DGIEP/D. Joseph
`DGIEP/Y-C. Ng
`OND IO/A. Jacobs
`
`Reference ID: 4021862
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`DAVID B JOSEPH
`12/02/2016
`
`Reference ID: 4021862
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`
`PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY NDA REVIEW AND EVALUATION
`
`Application number:
`
`208,745
`
`Supporting document/s:
`
`1
`
`Applicant’s letter date:
`
`1/29/2016
`
`CDER stamp date:
`
`1/29/2016
`
`Product:
`
`Trulance (plecanatide) tablets
`
`Indication:
`
`Chronic idiopathic constipation
`
`Applicant:
`
`Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`
`Review Division:
`
`Gastroenterology and Inborn Errors Products
`
`Reviewer:
`
`Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`Supervisor/Team Leader:
`
`David B. Joseph, PhD
`
`Division Director:
`
`Donna Griebel, MD
`
`Project Manager:
`
`Maureen D. Dewey
`
`Disclaimer
`
`Except as specifically identified, all data and information discussed below and
`necessary for approval of NDA 208,745 are owned by Synergy or are data for which
`Synergy has obtained a written right of reference. Any information or data necessary
`for approval of NDA 208,745 that Synergy does not own or have a written right to
`reference constitutes one of the following: (1) published literature, or (2) a prior FDA
`finding of safety or effectiveness for a listed drug, as reflected in the drug’s approved
`labeling. Any data or information described or referenced below from reviews or
`publicly available summaries of a previously approved application is for descriptive
`purposes only and is not relied upon for approval of NDA 208,745.
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`1
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
` EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 4
`
`INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 4
`1.1
`1.2 BRIEF DISCUSSION OF NONCLINICAL FINDINGS ...................................................... 4
`1.3 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ 5
`
` 1
`
`2 DRUG INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 11
`
`2.1 DRUG ............................................................................................................... 11
`2.2 RELEVANT INDS, NDAS, BLAS AND DMFS ....................................................... 12
`2.3 DRUG FORMULATION ......................................................................................... 12
`2.4 COMMENTS ON NOVEL EXCIPIENTS ..................................................................... 12
`2.5 COMMENTS ON IMPURITIES/DEGRADANTS OF CONCERN ....................................... 12
`2.6
`PROPOSED CLINICAL POPULATION AND DOSING REGIMEN ................................... 14
`2.7 REGULATORY BACKGROUND ............................................................................. 15
`
`3 STUDIES SUBMITTED .......................................................................................... 15
`
`3.1
`3.2
`3.3
`
`STUDIES REVIEWED ........................................................................................... 15
`STUDIES NOT REVIEWED ................................................................................... 22
`PREVIOUS REVIEWS REFERENCED...................................................................... 22
`
`4 PHARMACOLOGY ................................................................................................ 22
`
`4.1
`4.2
`4.3
`
`PRIMARY PHARMACOLOGY ................................................................................ 22
`SECONDARY PHARMACOLOGY ........................................................................... 37
`SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY .................................................................................. 38
`
`5 PHARMACOKINETICS/ADME/TOXICOKINETICS .............................................. 43
`
`5.1
`5.2
`
`PK/ADME ....................................................................................................... 43
`TOXICOKINETICS ............................................................................................... 60
`
`6 GENERAL TOXICOLOGY ..................................................................................... 60
`
`SINGLE-DOSE TOXICITY ..................................................................................... 60
`6.1
`6.2 REPEAT-DOSE TOXICITY .................................................................................... 71
`
`7 GENETIC TOXICOLOGY .................................................................................... 157
`
`IN VITRO REVERSE MUTATION ASSAY IN BACTERIAL CELLS (AMES) ................... 157
`7.1
`IN VITRO ASSAYS IN MAMMALIAN CELLS ........................................................... 161
`7.2
`IN VIVO CLASTOGENICITY ASSAY IN RODENT (MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY)............... 167
`7.3
`7.4 OTHER GENETIC TOXICITY STUDIES .................................................................. 172
`
`8 CARCINOGENICITY ........................................................................................... 172
`
`9 REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY .............................. 220
`
`9.1
`9.2
`9.3
`
`FERTILITY AND EARLY EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT ............................................ 220
`EMBRYONIC FETAL DEVELOPMENT ................................................................... 234
`PRENATAL AND POSTNATAL DEVELOPMENT ...................................................... 255
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`2
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`SPECIAL TOXICOLOGY STUDIES ................................................................. 308
`
`INTEGRATED SUMMARY AND SAFETY EVALUATION ............................... 308
`
`APPENDIX/ATTACHMENTS ........................................................................... 316
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`3
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`1
`
`Executive Summary
`
`1.1
`
`Introduction
`
`Plecanatide (SP-304) is a synthetic hexadecapeptide that is designed to mimic the
`action of uroguanylin and guanylin, which are endogenous peptide agonists for the
`guanylate cyclase C (GC-C) receptor. These peptides are secreted in the GI tract and
`up-regulate intracellular production of cGMP (cyclic guanosine 3’, 5’-monophosphate) in
`the intestinal epithelium. Elevated cGMP activates the cystic fibrosis transmembrane
`conductance regulator (CFTR), which leads to trans-epithelial efflux of chloride and
`bicarbonate from enterocytes lining the GI tract into the lumen of the gut, and secretion
`of water into the intestinal lumen. Increased secretion of water into the GI tract can
`loosen stools, stimulate bowel movements, and thus relieve constipation. The proposed
`indication for plecanatide is treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation.
`
`
`1.2 Brief Discussion of Nonclinical Findings
`
`Plecanatide is well tolerated in adult mice, rats, and monkeys at oral doses up to 3000-,
`2000-, and 2000-times the recommended human dose (3 mg), respectively, on a mg/kg
`basis for an assumed human weight of 60 kg. It should be noted that plecanatide and
`its active metabolite are not measurable in human plasma following administration of
`the recommended dose, whereas limited systemic exposure to plecanatide was
`achieved in the nonclinical studies. Therefore, the animal to human dose ratios listed
`above are not indicative of relative exposure. Neonatal/juvenile mice have been shown
`to be particularly sensitive to plecanatide toxicity. Lethality of plecanatide was found to
`be highly age-dependent; the minimum lethal doses in PND (postnatal day) 7 and PND
`14 mice were 0.5 and 10 mg/kg/day, respectively, as compared to the recommended
`human dose of 3 mg (0.05 mg/kg/day, based on a 60-kg bodyweight). There were no
`deaths at up to 300 mg/kg/day in juvenile mice administered plecanatide starting on
`PND 21. In the PND 7 and PND 14 mice, deaths occurred within the first or second day
`after dosing. Clinical signs included decreased motor activity and dehydration. No
`gross lesions were noted at necropsy. Treatment-related increases in the weight of
`intestinal contents were observed in juvenile mice following single oral doses of 1, 3,
`and 10 mg/kg/day plecanatide on PND 14, and to a lesser extent on PND 21. The
`increase in intestine weight after plecanatide administration appears to be consistent
`with the pharmacological action of plecanatide. The minimum lethal dose of 0.5
`mg/kg/day at PND 7 is 10 times the recommended human dose (0.05 mg/kg/day) based
`on a 60-kg bodyweight. It is noted that the levels of expression of the receptor for heat-
`stable enterotoxin (i.e. GC-C) in the small and large intestine of children is age
`dependent; a greater number of receptors are present in infants, and the number
`decreases with increasing age. Thus, the data from neonatal/juvenile mice may have
`clinical relevance in infants or young pediatric patients.
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`4
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`1.3 Recommendations
`
`1.3.1 Approvability
`
`From a nonclinical standpoint, there are no approvability issues.
`
`
`1.3.2 Additional Non Clinical Recommendations
`
`Recommendations for labeling changes are shown in the following section.
`
`
`1.3.3 Labeling
`
`Established Pharmacologic Class (HIGHLIGHTS)
`
`The Sponsor’s proposed EPC (established pharmacologic class) text phrase in the
`Highlights of Prescribing Information is “guanylate cyclase-C agonist”. Plecanatide is an
`analog of the endogenous human uroguanylin peptide, and both are guanylate cyclase-
`C agonists. The mechanism of action of plecanatide is identical to that of the approved
`drug LINZESS (linaclotide), an analog of guanylin. The EPC for linaclotide is “guanylate
`cyclase-C agonist”. Therefore, the Sponsor’s proposed EPC text phrase “guanylate
`cyclase-C agonist” for plecanatide is deemed appropriate.
`
`The following subsections in the labeling should be revised as recommended.
`
`Sponsor’s Proposed Version:
`
`5.1
`
` 6 years of age. The safety and
`TRADENAME is contraindicated in
` patients
` 18 years of age have not
`effectiveness of TRADENAME in
` plecanatide
`been established. In young juvenile mice
`increased fluid-secretion into the intestines as a consequence of stimulation of
`guanylate cyclase-C (GC-C)
` mortality in some within the first 24 hours
`apparently due to dehydration
`
`
`
`
`
` years of age.
` patients 6
`Avoid the use of PLECANATIDE in
`, given the deaths in
`Although there were no deaths in older juvenile mice
`younger mice and the lack of clinical safety and efficacy data in pediatric patients, avoid
`the use of TRADENAME in
` patients 6
` years of age [see
`Contraindications (Error! Reference source not found.), Use in Specific Populations
`
`
`
`Evaluation: The following revised version was developed in collaboration with the
`Medical and Pediatric teams.
`
`Recommended Version:
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`5
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`5.1 Risk of Serious Dehydration in Pediatric Patients
`
`
`TRADENAME is contraindicated in patients less than 6 years of age. The safety and
`effectiveness of TRADENAME in patients less than 18 years of age have not been
`established. In young juvenile mice
` plecanatide increased fluid
`secretion into the intestines as a consequence of stimulation of guanylate cyclase-C
`(GC-C) resulting in mortality in some mice within the first 24 hours, apparently due to
`dehydration. Due to increased intestinal expression of GC-C, patients less than 6 years
`of age may be more likely than patients 6 years of age and older to develop significant
`diarrhea and its potentially serious consequences.
`
`Avoid the use of TRADENAME in patients 6 years to less than 18 years of age.
`Although there were no deaths in older juvenile mice
` given the
`deaths in younger mice and the lack of clinical safety and efficacy data in pediatric
`patients, avoid the use of TRADENAME in patients 6 years to less than 18 years of age
`[see Contraindications (Error! Reference source not found.), Warnings and
`Precautions (5.2), Use in Specific Populations (8.4)].
`
`
`Sponsor’s Proposed Version:
`
`8.1 Pregnancy
`
`Risk Summary
`
`Data
`
`Animal data
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`6
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON
`ORIGINAL
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`Limited systemic exposure to plecanatide was achieved in animals (area under the
` rabbits given 250
`time-concentration curve [AUCt] = 449 ng•h/mL
`mg/kg/day
` Plecanatide and its active metabolite
`are not measurable in human plasma following administration of the recommended
`clinical
` Therefore, animal and human doses should not be compared directly for
`exposure.
`
`
`Evaluation: The following revised version was developed in collaboration with the
`Maternal Health team (Christos Mastroyannis and Tamara Johnson).
`
`Recommended Version:
`
`8.1 Pregnancy
`
`
`Risk Summary
`
`Plecanatide is negligibly absorbed systemically following oral administration [see
`Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)], and is not expected to result in fetal exposure to the
`drug.
`
`The available data on TRADENAME use in pregnant women are not sufficient to inform
`any drug-associated risk for major birth defects and miscarriage. In animal
`developmental studies, no effects on embryo-fetal development were observed with oral
`administration of plecanatide in mice and rabbits during organogenesis at doses much
`higher than the maximum recommended human dosage.
`
`In the United States general population, the estimated background risk of major birth
`defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2% to 4% and 15% to
`20%, respectively.
`
`Data
`
`Animal Data
`
`Pregnant mice and rabbits were administered plecanatide during the period of
`organogenesis. There was no evidence of harm to embryo-fetal development at oral
`doses up to 800 mg/kg/day in mice and 250 mg/kg/day in rabbits. Oral administration of
`up to 600 mg/kg/day in mice during organogenesis through lactation produced no
`developmental abnormalities or effects on growth, learning and memory, or fertility in
`the offspring through maturation.
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`7
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`The maximum recommended human dose is approximately 0.05 mg/kg/day, based on a
`60-kg body weight. Limited systemic exposure to plecanatide was achieved in animals
`([AUCt] = 449 ng•h/mL in rabbits given 250 mg/kg/day during organogenesis).
`Plecanatide and its active metabolite are not measurable in human plasma following
`administration of the recommended clinical dosages. Therefore, animal and human
`doses should not be compared directly for evaluating relative exposure.
`
`
`Sponsor’s Proposed Version:
`
`8.4 Pediatric Use
`
`
`
`TRADENAME is contraindicated in pediatric patients
`
` 6 years of age.
`
`
`Evaluation: The following revised version was developed in collaboration with the
`Pediatric and Labeling Development teams.
`
`Recommended Version:
`
`8.4 Pediatric Use
`
`TRADENAME is contraindicated in patients less than 6 years of age. Avoid use of
`TRADENAME in patients 6 years to less than 18 years of age [see Contraindications
`(4), Warnings and Precautions (5.1)]. The safety and effectiveness of TRADENAME in
`patients less than 18 years of age have not been established.
`
`In nonclinical studies, deaths occurred within 24 hours in young juvenile mice (human
`age equivalent of approximately 1 month to less than 2 years) following administration
`of one or two once daily oral doses of plecanatide, as described below in Juvenile
`Animal Toxicity Data. Because of increased intestinal expression of GC-C, patients less
`than 6 years of age may be more likely than patients 6 years of age and older to
`develop diarrhea and its potentially serious consequences. TRADENAME is
`contraindicated in patients less than 6 years of age.
`
`
`
`
` Given the deaths in young juvenile
`mice and the lack of clinical safety and efficacy data in pediatric patients, avoid the use
`of TRADENAME in patients 6 years to less than 18 years of age.
`
`Juvenile Animal Toxicity Data
`
`Single oral doses of plecanatide at 0.5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg caused mortality in young
`juvenile mice on postnatal days
` 7 and 14, respectively (human age equivalent
`of approximately 1 month to less than 2 years). Treatment-related increases in the
`weight of intestinal contents were observed in juvenile mice following single doses of
`
`plecanatide on
` 14 (human age equivalent of approximately less than 2 years),
` consistent
`
`
`with increased fluid in the intestinal lumen.
`
` The
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`8
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`recommended human dose is approximately 0.05 mg/kg/day, based on a 60-kg body
`weight. Plecanatide and its active metabolite are not measurable in human plasma
` whereas systemic
`, animal
`absorption was demonstrated in the juvenile animal toxicity studies.
`and human doses should not be compared directly for evaluating relative exposure.
`
`
`Sponsor’s Proposed Version:
`
`12.1 Mechanism of Action
`
` Both plecanatide
`and its active metabolite bind to GC-C and act locally on the luminal surface of the
`intestinal epithelium. Activation of GC-C results in an increase in both intracellular and
`extracellular concentrations of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Elevation of
`intracellular cGMP stimulates secretion of chloride and bicarbonate into the intestinal
`lumen, mainly through activation of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance
`regulator ion channel (CFTR), resulting in increased intestinal fluid and accelerated
`transit. In animal models, plecanatide has been shown to increase fluid secretion into
`the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, accelerate intestinal transit, and cause changes in stool
`consistency.
`
`
`
`
`
`Evaluation: The following revised version is recommended.
`
`Recommended Version:
`
`Plecanatide is a guanylate cyclase-C (GC-C) agonist. Both plecanatide and its active
`metabolite bind to GC-C and act locally on the luminal surface of the intestinal
`epithelium. Activation of GC-C results in an increase in both intracellular and
`extracellular concentrations of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Elevation of
`intracellular cGMP stimulates secretion of chloride and bicarbonate into the intestinal
`lumen, mainly through activation of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance
`regulator (CFTR) ion channel, resulting in increased intestinal fluid and accelerated
`transit. In animal models, plecanatide has been shown to increase fluid secretion into
`the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, accelerate intestinal transit, and cause changes in stool
`consistency.
`
`
`
`
`
`Sponsor’s Proposed Version:
`
`13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
`
`Carcinogenesis
`
`The carcinogenic potential of plecanatide was assessed in a 2-year carcinogenicity
`study in mice and
` rats.
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`9
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`Mutagenesis
`
`Plecanatide was not genotoxic in
` in vitro mouse lymphoma
`
`
`
`
`Impairment of Fertility
`
` in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) assay
` assay
` in vivo mouse bone marrow micronucleus
`
`
`
`
`effect on fertility
`
` Plecanatide had no
` or reproductive function at oral doses of up to 600
`
`Evaluation: The following revised version is recommended.
`
`Recommended Version:
`
`13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
`
`Carcinogenesis
`
`The carcinogenic potential of plecanatide was assessed in 2-year carcinogenicity
`studies in mice and rats. Plecanatide was not tumorigenic in mice at oral doses up to
`90 mg/kg/day or in rats at oral does up to 100 mg/kg/day. Limited systemic exposure to
`plecanatide was achieved at the tested dose levels in animals, whereas no detectable
`exposure occurred in humans. Therefore, animal and human doses should not be
`compared directly for evaluating relative exposure.
`
`
`
`Mutagenesis
`
`Plecanatide was not genotoxic in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) assay, in
`vitro mouse lymphoma mutation assay or the in vivo mouse bone marrow micronucleus
`assay.
`
`
`
`Impairment of Fertility
`
`Plecanatide had no effect on fertility or reproductive function in male and female mice at
`oral doses of up to 600 mg/kg/day.
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`10
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`
`Sponsor’s Proposed Version:
`
`
`
`Evaluation: This subsection should be removed.
`
`
` 2
`
` Drug Information
`
`2.1 Drug
`
`CAS Registry Number – 467426-54-6
`
`Generic Name - Plecanatide
`
`Code Name – SP-304
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`11
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`Chemical Name -
`
`
`Molecular Formula/Molecular Weight: C65H104N18O26S4 /1682
`
`Structure or Biochemical Description
`
`
`
`Pharmacologic Class – guanylate cyclase-C agonist
`
`
`2.2 Relevant INDs, NDAs, BLAs and DMFs
`
`
`
`
`
`IND 74,883 (Plecanatide for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation) Synergy
`Pharmaceuticals Inc., New York
`
`
`2.3 Drug Formulation
`
`Plecanatide tablets are an immediate release solid oral dosage form provided as a 3 mg
` dosage strength. The components and composition of plecanatide tablets, 3
`, are shown in the table below, taken from the Sponsor’s submission.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.4 Comments on Novel Excipients
`
`There are no novel excipients used in the manufacture of plecanatide tablets. The
`excipients to be used in the plecanatide formulation appear to be safe. The FDA
`Inactive Ingredients Database confirms that all the excipients listed in the table above
`are present in approved oral formulations at levels (e.g., mg/tablet) that exceed the
`maximum daily dose (mg) in plecanatide tablets, based on the proposed maximum dose
`of
` plecanatide (
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`12
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`2.5 Comments on Impurities/Degradants of Concern
`
`In a pre-NDA meeting held on October 30, 2014, the CMC and nonclinical teams
`agreed that the reporting, identification, and qualification thresholds for potential
`impurities should be
`%, respectively, as proposed by the
`Sponsor. The Sponsor has reported and identified five drug product impurities, namely
`
`
`
` Based on a drug substance stress study,
`these 5 impurities were also identified as degradation products. All other drug product
`impurities are below the reporting threshold of %.
`
`
`The specifications for
`
`threshold. The specifications for
`%, respectively. These limits exceed the qualification threshold,
`therefore the safety of
` were evaluated.
`
`
` and are therefore compliant with the qualification
` are
`
` by
`The Sponsor qualified the
`demonstrating the presence of substantial levels of these two impurities in the drug
`substance lots
` The table below
`taken from the Sponsor’s submission shows the safety factors of these two impurities
`based on body surface area.
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`13
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`
`
`
`The safety factors shown in the Sponsor’s table were calculated based on NOAEL and
`body surface area. However, similar to the parent compound plecanatide,
`
` are likely to have very little systemic exposure.
`Therefore, a dose multiple calculated on a mg/kg basis will be more appropriate. Based
`on a mg/kg comparison, the safety factors would have been greater than those shown
`in the above table.
`
`In addition, considerations were given to address whether
` could be a mutagenic impurity, which would have a
`lower acceptable daily intake. It is noted that
` itself tested negative in the
`Ames assay (European Chemicals Agency registration-dossier), and therefore,
` appears unlikely to be a mutagenic impurity.
`
`
`
`
`
`Taken together, the impurities known as
` are considered qualified at the proposed limits in the drug product.
`
`
`
`2.6 Proposed Clinical Population and Dosing Regimen
`
`Patients with chronic idiopathic constipation: 3
`
`
` orally once daily.
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`14
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`2.7 Regulatory Background
`
`IND 74,883 was submitted by Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc. on 4/2/2008 for SP-304
`(plecanatide) for the treatment of chronic constipation.
`
`Studies Submitted
`
` 3
`
`
`
`3.1 Studies Reviewed
`
`THE FOLLOWING PHARMACOLOGY STUDIES WERE REVIEWED (starting on
`page 22)
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`15
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`16
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`THE FOLLOWING PHARMACOKINETIC STUDIES WERE REVIEWED (starting on
`page 43)
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`17
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`18
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`19
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`THE FOLLOWING TOXICOLOGY STUDIES WERE REVIEWED (starting on page 60)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`20
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`21
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`
`
`3.2 Studies Not Reviewed
`
`None
`
`
`3.3 Previous Reviews Referenced
`
`
`
`Pharmacology/Toxicology Reviews of IND 74,883 by David B. Joseph, PhD dated
`7/2/2008, and by Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD dated 2/2/2010, 5/27/2010, 7/25/2013, 8/2/2013,
`and 6/11/2014 are referenced.
`
`Pharmacology
`
` 4
`
`
`
`4.1 Primary Pharmacology
`
`
`SP-304 (Plecanatide): Stimulation of Intracellular cGMP Synthesis in T84 Cells (Study No. SP-PH-
`001)
`
`Materials and Methods
`The ability of plecanatide to stimulate cGMP production
`was studied in T84 human colon carcinoma cells in vitro.
`Plecanatide (N-terminal amino acid sequence NDE),
`uroguanylin (UG, NDD), and 2 related peptides, SP-302
`(NEE) and SP-303 (NED), were tested at concentrations
`ranging from 10-9 M to 10-5 M. Cell lysates derived from
`cells exposed for 30 minutes to the peptides were
`assayed for cGMP levels using a commercial enzyme-
`linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
`
`Results and Conclusion
`All 4 peptides increased cGMP production in
`a concentration-dependent manner. At a
`concentration of 10-6 M, cGMP levels were
`54% higher in plecanatide-treated cells
`compared with UG-treated cells.
`Plecanatide stimulated cGMP production in
`T84 colon carcinoma cells with a half-
`maximal effective concentration (EC50) of 1.1
`x 10-7 M. Plecanatide was 2 to 3 fold
`more potent than UG and the other related
`test peptides in this bioassay, and induced
`
`Reference ID: 4000392
`
`22
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 208,745 Reviewer: Yuk-Chow Ng, PhD
`
`
`
`Studies on SP-304 (Plecanatide) Thermostability, pH Dependency, and Topoisomeric Stability
`(Study No. SP-PH-004)
`
`higher cGMP levels (>50% greater)
`compared with the other peptides.
`
`Materials and Methods
`Thermostability of plecanatide was examined after it was
`incubated at 95°C for up to 90 minutes, and the ability of
`plecanatide to stimulate cGMP synthesis was measured
`after 30-minute incubations with T84 cells at different pH.
`The conformational makeup (topoisomeric composition) of
`plecanatide and UG was analyzed by high-performance
`liquid chromatography (HPLC) following a 16-hour
`incubation at pH 3.0 and 37°C.
`
`
`
`
`
`Results and Conclusion
`Plecanatide retained 100% activity after 90
`minutes at 95°C, as assessed by the cGMP
`T84 cell assay. In contrast, UG lost about
`15% of its activity after 90 minutes. The
`ability of plecanatide to stimulate cGMP
`synthesis in cells incubated at pH ranging
`from 6.0 to 6.5 was greater than that of UG
`and 2 related peptides, SP-302 and SP-303,
`used in the study. Maximum plecanatide
`activity was observed at pH 6.0.
`
`After a 16-hour incubation at 37°C and pH
`3.0, UG showed 2 major peaks and 2 minor
`peaks. This result is consistent with the
`interconversion of UG between 2 solution
`conformers, one biologically active and the
`other biologically inactive. In contrast,
`plecanatide showed only
`a single peak. The preparation of
`plecanatide used for the study was found to
`be fully active using the cGMP T84 cell
`assay, indicating that the single peak shown
`in the HPLC represents the fully active
`conformer of plecanatide.
`
`
`Stimulation of Intracellular cGMP Synthesis in T84 Cells: SP-304 (Plecanatide) & SP-338, A
`Comparative Study (Study No. SP-PH-008)
`
`Materials and Methods
`The efficacy of plecanatide and its metabolite SP-338 was
`compared in a cGMP production assay in T84 human
`colo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket