throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`208745Orig1s000
`
`
`OFFICE DIRECTOR MEMO
`
`
`
`

`

`Office Director Decisional Memorandum
`
`January 19, 2017
`
`Julie Beitz, MD
`Office Director Decisional Memo
`
`NDA #
`208745
`
`Applicant Name
`
`Date of Submission
`
`PDUFA Goal Date
`
`Proprietary Name /
`
`Established (USAN) Name
`
`Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`January 29, 2016
`
`January 29, 2017
`
`Trulance (plecanatide)
`
`Dosage Forms / Strengths
`
`Tablets 3 mg
`
`Proposed Indication
`
`Indicated in adults for the treatment of chronic
`
`Recommended Action:
`
`Approval
`
`idiopathic constipation (CIC)
`
`Materials Reviewed/Consulted
`
`Action Package, including reviews from:
`
`Discipline Reviewers
`
`
`
`0ND / DPMH / Pediatric Team
`
`Carolyn Yancey, MD / Mona Khurana, MD
`
`0ND / DPMH / Maternal Health Team
`
`Christos Mastroyannis, MD / Tamara Johnson,
`
`MD, MS
`
`MPH
`
`Scott Komo, DrPH
`
`OCP / Division of Clinical Pharmacology I|| Dilara Jappar, PhD / Sue Chih Lee, PhD
`
`Haoheng Yan, PhD / Michele Dougherty, PhD /
`
`Fred Mills, PhD/Joslyn Brunelle PhD
`
`DGIEP = Division of Gastroenterology and lnbom Errors Products
`DPMH = Division of Pediatrics and Maternal Health
`08 = Office of Biostatisties
`OCP = Office of Clinical Pharmacology
`0ND = Office of New Drugs
`OSE = Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology
`
`Reference ID: 4043837
`
`

`

`1.  
`
`Benefit‐Risk Summary and Assessment 
`

`Trulance (plecanatide) is structurally related to human uroguanylin, functions as a guanylate cyclase‐C (GC‐C) agonist, and has been evaluated 
`in adults for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC).  Uroguanylin, a member of the guanylin peptide family that is secreted by 
`enterochromaffin cells in the duodenum and proximal small intestine, regulates the secretion of intestinal fluid.  Idiopathic constipation is a 
`common gastrointestinal disorder, affecting up to approximately 15% of the U.S. population.  Although many treatments for CIC are 
`commercially available, additional treatment options are needed, particularly for patients who do not respond to, or tolerate, existing 
`treatments.   

`Trulance (plecanatide) has been shown to be an efficacious, well‐tolerated treatment option for adults with CIC and would be the second FDA‐
`approved GC‐C agonist for this condition.  I concur with the recommendation of the Division of Gastroenterology and Inborn Errors Products to 
`approve Trulance (plecanatide) for the treatment of CIC in adults.  The recommended dose is 3 mg taken orally once daily.  Although a 6 mg 
`daily dose was also studied, the applicant will not market this dose.1  The safety and effectiveness of Trulance (plecanatide) in patients less than 
`18 years of age have not been established. 

`An FDA Advisory Committee Meeting was not held to discuss this application because the application did not raise significant safety or efficacy 
`issues that were unexpected for a drug in this class. 

`Data submitted in the NDA supported the efficacy and safety of Trulance (plecanatide).  The efficacy of Trulance (plecanatide) was established 
`in two randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trials involving adults with CIC.  The assumption that GC‐C agonism leads to movement of 
`chloride and bicarbonate anions and water into the intestinal lumen and increased intestinal transit has been borne out by the submitted 
`clinical trials of Trulance (plecanatide).  I concur that the observed improvements in stool frequency, stool consistency, and straining on 
`plecanatide treatment were both statistically superior to placebo and clinically meaningful to patients with CIC.   

`The safety profile of Trulance (plecanatide) is similar to that of the approved GC‐C agonist, Linzess (linaclotide), including the risk of serious 
`dehydration in pediatric patients.  In nonclinical studies of young juvenile mice, administration of a single oral dose of plecanatide caused 
`
`
`1 In clinical trials of Trulance (plecanatide), the 3 mg and 6 mg daily dose regimens were similarly effective.  However, patients treated with the higher dose 
`reported a slightly higher incidence of severe diarrhea and discontinuations due to diarrhea.  At the July 14, 2016 Mid‐Cycle Communication meeting, the 
`applicant indicated that it will not market the higher dose regimen.     
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4043837
`
`2
`
`

`

`deaths, likely due to dehydration.
`
`In adult patients with CIC, treatment with Trulance (plecanatide) was generally well tolerated. The
`
`treatment-emergent adverse event most commonly reported in clinical trials was diarrhea which was severe in some patients.
`
`The prescribers of Trulance (plecanatide) will likely be general practitioners and gastroenterologists familiar with the attendant risks of
`
`available treatments for CIC, including those associated with Linzess (linaclotide), another GC—C agonist. The safety concerns identified in
`
`nonclinical studies and with use of Trulance (plecanatide) in clinical trials can be adequately communicated in professional labeling that will
`
`include a boxed warning about the risk of serious dehydration in pediatric patients, and contraindicate use in patients less than 6 years of age.
`
`A Medication Guide will be required as part of approved labeling to provide important safety information to patients.
`
`A Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) will not be required for Trulance (plecanatide) to ensure that the benefits of the drug
`
`outweigh the risks. Routine pharmacovigilance will be conducted in the postmarketing setting. The results of required postmarketing studies
`
`will further inform product labeling regarding safe and effective use of Trulance (plecanatide) in pediatric patients, presence of the product in
`
`human breast milk, and its immunogenic potential.
`
`m
`
`Evidence, Uncertainties and Conclusions
`
`Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is a common functional gastrointestinal motility disorder, with approximately 63 million
`
`adults in North America meeting Rome ll criteria. To meet these criteria, symptoms should occur in the absence of a structural
`
`or biochemical explanation, should last for at least 12 weeks, which need not be consecutive, in the preceding 12 months, and
`
`include two or more of the following:
`
`
`
`Straining during at least 25% of defecations;
`
`Lumpy or hard stools in at least 25% of defecations;
`
`Sensation of incomplete evacuation for at least 25% of defecations;
`
`Sensation of anorectal obstruction/blockage for at least 25% of defecations;
`
`Manual maneuvers to facilitate at least 25% of defecations (e.g., digital evacuation, support of the pelvic floor); and/or
`
`< 3 defecations per week.
`
`Rome criteria, however, do not identify all the symptoms that patients define as constipation. It is estimated that an additional
`
`50 million in North America report that they have constipation but do not meet Rome ll criteria. That is, they consider
`
`

`

`m
`
`Evidence, Uncertainties and Conclusions
`
`themselves constipated, perhaps because they do not have daily bowel movements, despite the absence of straining, hard
`
`stools, or feelings of incomplete evacuation. In either case, individuals who self-report constipation or meet Rome criteria will
`
`seek treatment either by use of over-the-counter products or by visiting their physician and requesting a prescription
`
`medication. Constipation is more common in women than men and increases with advancing age, particularly after age 70.
`
`Data on the incidence of constipation, the natural history of constipation, or quality of life in patients with constipation are
`limited.2
`
`Comment. The availability of Trulance (plecanatide) would offer an FDA-approved, safe and effective alternative oral treatment
`
`for adults with symptoms of CIC. Although not life-threatening, symptoms of CIC can be bothersome to many millions of
`individuals in the U5.
`
`
`
`Treatment for patients with CIC is highly individualized and usually includes increased dietary fiber and supplementation with
`
`bulking agents, exercise, and bowel habit training. However, patients often obtain only partial relief, and the majority use non-
`
`bulking laxatives on a regular basis without medical supervision. Laxatives available over-the-counter are not intended for
`
`chronic use however. Chronic use of non-bulking laxatives may lead to dependency and progressive tolerance, electrolyte
`
`imbalance, and, for the anthraquinones, melanosis coli. Chronic use of stimulant laxatives may result in bloating, feelings of
`
`fullness, abdominal pain, and incomplete fecal evacuation.
`
`Linzess (linaclotide) was the first GC—C agonist to be approved in 2012. Linaclotide, structurally related to the guanylin peptide
`
`family, binds to the GC-C receptor expressed on intestinal epithelial cells thereby stimulating the intracellular production of
`
`cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and activation of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) ion
`
`channel. Activation of CFTR and the subsequent enhancement of transepithelial efflux of chloride and bicarbonate anions lead
`
`to movement of water into the intestinal lumen. The secretion of water into the lumen, in turn, is believed to facilitate bowel
`movements and accelerate intestinal transit. Linaclotide is indicated in adults for the treatment of CIC and for irritable bowel
`
`syndrome with constipation. Plecanatide is structurally related to human uroguanylin, a member of the guanylin peptide
`
`family. Like linaclotide, plecanatide acts as a GC—C agonist to increase intestinal fluid secretion and accelerate intestinal transit.
`
`If approved, Trulance (plecanatide) would be the second orally administered GC—C agonist for the treatment of CIC.
`
`

`

`m
`
`Evidence, Uncertainties and Conclusions
`
`Comment. Although many treatments for CIC are commercially available in the U.S., additional therapeutic options are
`
`needed, particularly for patients who do not respond to, or tolerate, existing treatments. Trulance (plecanatide) would offer an
`
`FDA—approved, safe and effective alternative oral treatment for adults with symptoms of CIC.
`
`The efficacy of Trulance (plecanatide) was established in two identical randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical
`
`trials involving adults with CIC, Trials SPD-304203-00 and SPD—304203-03. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either placebo or
`
`plecanatide 3 mg, once daily for 12 weeks without respect to food intake. The mean age of participants was 45.4 years (range
`
`18 to 80 years), 80% were female, 72% were white, and 24% were black.
`
`Eligible patients were required to meet modified Rome Ill criteria for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit, that is,
`
`report less than 3 defecations per week, rarely have a loose stool without the use of laxatives, not use manual maneuvers to
`
`facilitate defecations, and not meet criteria for constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
`
`In addition, patients were
`
`required to report at least two of the following symptoms:
`
`
`
`0 Straining during at least 25% of defecations
`
`Lumpy or hard stool in at least 25% of defecations
`
`Sensation of incomplete evacuation for at least 25% of defecations
`
`O o
`
`o Sensation of anorectal obstruction/blockage for at least 25% of defecations
`
`Efficacy was assessed using information provided by patients on a daily basis in an electronic diary. The primary efficacy
`
`endpoint was the proportion of patients who were CSBM responders (i.e., having spontaneous bowel movements associated
`
`with a sense of complete evacuation) during the 12-week treatment period. A responder was defined as a patient who had a
`
`least 3 CSBMs in a given week and an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline in the same week for at least 9 weeks out of the
`
`12 week treatment period, and at least 3 of the last 4 weeks of the trial.
`
`In Trial SPD-304203-00, 21% of plecanatide-treated patients vs. 10% of placebo-treated patients met the responder criteria, for
`
`a treatment difference of 11% (95% CI: 6.1%, 15.4%). In Trial SPD—304203-03, data from 30 patients were removed from
`
`analysis clue to integrity issues identified at two clinical sites. The efficacy findings in this trial were similar; 21% of plecanatide-
`
`

`

`m
`
`Evidence, Uncertainties and Conclusions
`
`treated patients vs. 13% of placebo-treated patients met the responder criteria, for a treatment difference of 8% (95% CI: 2.6%,
`
`12.4%). In both trials, the responder rate for plecanatide was statistically superior to the placebo responder rate.
`
`In addition, patients who received plecanatide 3 mg in these trials had statistically significant improvements in the secondary
`
`efficacy endpoints of change from baseline over the 12-week treatment period in: CSBM frequency, SBM frequency (i.e.,
`
`spontaneous bowel movements occurring in the absence of laxative use), stool consistency score (as measured by the Bristol
`
`Stool Form Scale) and straining score relative to placebo. The meaningfulness of these findings was evaluated using cumulative
`
`distribution function plots to assess the amount of separation between treatment groups at meaningful responder thresholds
`
`derived from Phase 2 data, if available. A modest but consistent separation between treatment groups was observed at the 1.8
`
`CSBM, 2.8 SBM and 1.4 stool consistency thresholds. The meaningfulness of the improvement in straining score was also
`
`demonstrated, but to a lesser extent as the separation between treatment groups at the -1 point straining threshold was small.
`
`
`
`Following completion of the drug treatment period, patients continued to record symptom data in the daily diary for 2 weeks
`
`post-treatment. During this time, plecanatide-treated patients generally returned to baseline levels of constipation.
`
`Comment. The efficacy of Trulance (plecanatide) has been established in two randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials in
`
`adults with CIC. The efficacy of plecanatide in pediatric patients less than 18 years of age has not been established. The
`
`assumption that GC—C agonism leads to movement of chloride and bicarbonate anions and water into the intestinal lumen and
`
`increased intestinal transit has been borne out by the submitted clinical trials of Trulance (plecanatide).
`
`I concur that the
`
`observed improvements in stool frequency, stool consistency and straining on plecanatide treatment were both statistically
`
`superior to placebo and clinically meaningful to adult patients with CIC.
`
`A total of 863 and 870 adult patients with CIC administered plecanatide 3 mg or placebo, respectively, once daily for 12 weeks
`
`in two double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials are evaluable for safety. The safety of plecanatide in pediatric patients
`
`less than 18 years of age has not been established.
`
`General Considerations. Plecanatide is negligibly absorbed systemically following oral administration. Plecanatide does not
`
`inhibit CYP2C9 or CYP3A4, and does not induce CYP3A4 in vitro. Plecanatide is neither a substrate or inhibitor of the
`
`transporters P-glycoprotein or breast cancer resistance protein in vitro.
`
`

`

`m
`
`Evidence, Uncertainties and Conclusions
`
`Although there are no data on plecanatide use in pregnancy to inform any drug-associated risks, use by pregnant women is not
`
`expected to result in fetal exposure to the drug. No information is available regarding the presence of plecanatide in human
`
`milk, or its effects on milk production or the breastfed infant.
`
`Plecanatide is not tumorigenic in 2-year carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats. Plecanatide is not genotoxic in in vitro assays
`
`or the in viva mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay, and has no effect on fertility or reproductive function in male or female
`mice.
`
`Treatment—Emergent Adverse Events. During the 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the two randomized
`
`clinical trials, the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea. Diarrhea was reported in 5% and 1% of
`
`patients treated with plecanatide 3 mg and placebo, respectively. The majority of cases occurred within 4 weeks of treatment
`
`initiation. Severe diarrhea was reported in 0.6% and 0.3% of patients treated with plecanatide 3 mg and placebo, respectively,
`
`and occurred within 3 days of treatment. Diarrhea was the most common adverse reaction leading to treatment
`
`discontinuation: 2% of patients treated with plecanatide 3 mg and 0.5% of patients treated with placebo withdrew due to
`
`diarrhea. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across age, gender, race and BMI subgroups.
`
`
`
`Comment.
`
`In adults with CIC, treatment with plecanatide was generally well tolerated. Consistent with the known activity of
`
`the drug, the treatment-emergent adverse event most commonly reported in clinical trials of plecanatide was diarrhea which
`
`was severe in some cases.
`
`I concur with the recommendation to suspend treatment with plecanatide and rehydrate the
`
`patient if severe diarrhea develops. Plecanatide shares structural homology with uroguanylin, however, there was no evidence
`
`of uroguanylin peptide depletion syndrome in clinical trials (as evidenced by hypernatremia, pulmonary edema, peripheral
`
`edema, sudden weight gain, and/or hypertension).
`
`Risk of Serious Dehydration in Pediatric Patients. In young (1- to 2-week-old) juvenile mice (human age equivalent of
`
`approximately 1 month to less than 2 years), single oral daily doses of plecanatide at 0.5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg increased fluid
`
`secretion into the intestine as a consequence of stimulation of GC—C. Deaths occurred in some mice within the first 24 hours,
`
`apparently due to dehydration. Due to increased intestinal expression of GC—C, patients less than 6 years of age may be more
`
`likely than older patients to develop severe diarrhea and its potentially serious complications.
`
`

`

`m
`
`Evidence, Uncertainties and Conclusions
`
`Comment. Given the deaths observed in young juvenile mice in nonclinical studies and the lack of clinical safety and efficacy
`
`data in pediatric patients less than 18 years of age, I concur with the recommendation to contraindicate use of Trulance
`
`(plecanatide) in pediatric patients less than 6 years of age.
`
`Labeling. The prescribers of Trulance (plecanatide) will likely be general practitioners and gastroenterologists familiar with
`
`treatments for CIC, including Linzess (linaclotide). Product labeling will address the serious safety concerns identified in
`
`nonclinical studies in young juvenile mice and with use in clinical trials, namely:
`
`0 Risk of serious dehydration in pediatric patients
`0 Severe diarrhea
`
`In addition, a Medication Guide will be required as part of approved labeling to provide important safety information to
`
`patients; routine pharmacovigilance will be conducted in the postmarket setting.
`
`Risk Mitigation. A Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) will not be required for Trulance (plecanatide). It is likely
`
`that practitioners who will prescribe Trulance (plecanatide) for CIC will be aware of the attendant risks of treatment with GC—C
`
`agonists, given the previous marketing experience with the FDA-approved Linzess (linaclotide) product.
`
`
`
`Postmarketing Required Studies.
`
`Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA)
`
`The Agency is waiving the pediatric study requirement for ages birth to less than 2 years because there is evidence strongly
`
`suggesting that Trulance (plecanatide) would be unsafe in this pediatric group. The applicant will be required to 1) assess the
`
`pharmacokinetic profile of Trulance (plecanatide) in pediatric patients with CIC ages 12 to less than 18 years, then in patients
`
`ages 6 to less than 12 years, and finally, in ages 2 to less than 6 years; 2) confirm the product’s efficacy and safety in pediatric
`
`

`

`m
`
`Evidence, Uncertainties and Conclusions
`
`pediatric patients with CIC ages 2 to less than 18 years.
`
`Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA)
`
`The applicant will be required to:
`
`(plecanatide) in pediatric patients, presence of the product in human breast milk, and its immunogenic potential.
`
`o Characterize GC—C mRNA expression in duodenal and colonic mucosal biopsies in pediatric patients undergoing
`
`diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopies as part of their medical care. An analogous requirement was imposed on Forest
`
`Laboratories, Inc., the applicant for the Linzess (linaclotide) NDA (202811). The Trulance applicant is encouraged to
`
`collaborate with Forest Laboratories to complete this study.
`
`Perform a milk-only lactation trial in lactating women receiving plecanatide therapeutically to assess concentrations of
`
`plecanatide and its active metabolite in breast milk to inform product labeling. Because young juvenile mice
`
`demonstrated increased sensitivity to plecanatide, it is important to determine how much drug is present in human
`breast milk.
`
`Develop and validate a sensitive assay for the detection of anti-plecanatide antibodies, including lgM, lgG, and lgA that
`
`may be present in patient serum samples, and evaluate individual patient titers and the relationship between antibody
`
`status and drug efficacy and safety;
`
`Develop and validate assays to evaluate the cross-reactivity of anti-plecanatide antibodies to guanylin and uroguanylin,
`
`and evaluate the relationship between cross-reactivity status and drug efficacy and safety; and
`
`Develop and validate an assay to evaluate the neutralizing capacity of anti-plecanatide antibodies detected in patient
`
`samples, and evaluate the relationship between neutralizing antibody status and drug efficacy and safety.
`
`Comment. The safety concerns identified in nonclinical studies and with use of Trulance (plecanatide) in clinical trials can be
`
`adequately managed by professional labeling, a Medication Guide, that will be required as part of approved labeling to
`
`communicate important safety information to patients, and routine pharmacovigilance in the postmarketing setting. The
`
`results of required postmarketing studies will further inform product labeling regarding the safe and effective use of Trulance
`
`

`

`
`
`



`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4043837
`
`10
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY ON ORIGINAL
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`JULIE G BEITZ
`01/19/2017
`
`Reference ID: 4043837
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket