throbber

`
`
`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`208026Orig1s000
`
`
`OTHER REVIEW(S)
`
`

`

`
`Date:
`
`To:
`
`
`Through:
`
`
`From:
`
`Subject:
`
`Department of Health and Human Services
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Office of Medical Policy
`
`PATIENT LABELING REVIEW
`
`May 5, 2016
`
`Jean-Marc Guettier, MD
`Director
`Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products
`(DMEP)
`
`LaShawn Griffiths, MSHS-PH, BSN, RN
`Associate Director for Patient Labeling
`Division of Medical Policy Programs (DMPP)
`Shawna Hutchins, MPH, BSN, RN
`Team Leader, Patient Labeling
`Division of Medical Policy Programs (DMPP)
`
`Sharon W. Williams, MSN, BSN, RN
`Patient Labeling Reviewer
`Division of Medical Policy Programs (DMPP)
`
`Charuni Shah, PharmD
`Regulatory Review Officer
`Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP)
`Review of Patient Labeling: Medication Guide (MG)
`
`JENTADUETO XR (linagliptin and metformin
`hydrochloride)
`
`extended-release tablets, for oral use
`
`
`NDA 208026
`
`
`
`Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`Drug Name (established
`name):
`
`Dosage Form and Route:
`
`Application
`Type/Number:
`
`
`Applicant:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3927045
`
`

`

` 1
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`On July 27, 2015, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. submitted for the
`Agency’s review a New Drug Application for JENTADUETO XR (linagliptin and
`metformin hydrochloride) extended-release tablets. The purpose of the submission is
`to seek approval for the extended release form for JENTADUETO (linagliptin and
`metformin hydrochloride) tablets which are currently approved.
`JENTADUETO XR (linagliptin and metformin hydrochloride) extended-release
`tablets are used as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in
`adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus when treatment with both linagliptin and
`metformin is appropriate.
` This collaborative review is written by the Division of Medical Policy Programs
`(DMPP) and the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) in response to a
`request by the Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products (DMEP) on July
`31, 2015, for DMPP and OPDP to review the Applicant’s proposed Medication
`Guide (MG) for JENTADUETO XR (linagliptin and metformin hydrochloride)
`extended-release tablets.
`
`2 MATERIAL REVIEWED
`• Draft JENTADUETO XR (linagliptin and metformin hydrochloride) extended-
`release tablets MG received on July 27, 2015, revised by the Review Division
`throughout the review cycle and received by DMPP and OPDP on April 29, 2016.
`• Draft, JENTADUETO XR (linagliptin and metformin hydrochloride) extended-
`release tablets Prescribing Information (PI) received on July 27, 2015, revised by
`the Review Division throughout the review cycle, and received by DMPP and
`OPDP on April 29, 2016.
`• Approved JENTADUETO (linagliptin and metformin hydrochloride) tablet
`labeling dated April 28, 2015.
`
` 3
`
` REVIEW METHODS
`In 2008 the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation (ASCP) in
`collaboration with the American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) published
`Guidelines for Prescription Labeling and Consumer Medication Information for
`People with Vision Loss. The ASCP and AFB recommended using fonts such as
`Verdana, Arial or APHont to make medical information more accessible for patients
`with vision loss. We reformatted the MG document using the Arial font, size 10.
`In our collaborative review of the MG we:
`simplified wording and clarified concepts where possible
`•
`ensured that the MG is consistent with the Prescribing Information (PI)
`•
`ensured that the MG is free of promotional language or suggested revisions to
`•
`ensure that it is free of promotional language
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3927045
`
`
`
`

`

`•
`
`•
`
`ensured that the MG meets the criteria as specified in FDA’s Guidance for
`Useful Written Consumer Medication Information (published July 2006)
`ensured that the MG is consistent with the approved comparator labeling where
`applicable
`
` CONCLUSIONS
`The MG is acceptable with our recommended changes.
`
` RECOMMENDATIONS
`• Please send these comments to the Applicant and copy DMPP and OPDP on the
`correspondence.
`• Our collaborative review of the MG is appended to this memorandum. Consult
`DMPP and OPDP regarding any additional revisions made to the PI to determine
`if corresponding revisions need to be made to the MG.
` Please let us know if you have any questions.
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3927045
`
`
`
`7 Page(s) of Draft Labeling have been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`SHARON W WILLIAMS
`05/05/2016
`
`CHARUNI P SHAH
`05/05/2016
`
`SHAWNA L HUTCHINS
`05/05/2016
`
`Reference ID: 3927045
`
`

`

`suVlCu.
`
`”‘9
`
`9“
`3°
`
`3&0 C
`(”Mum
`
`DEPARTNIENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`
`Public Health Service
`
`Division ofPediatric and Maternal Health
`Office ofNew Drugs
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Food and Drug Administration
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`Tel 301-796-2200
`
`FAX 301-796-9744
`
`Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health Memorandum
`
`Date:
`
`April 28, 2016
`
`Date consulted: July 31, 2015
`
`From:
`
`Miriam Dinatale, DO, Medical Officer, Maternal Health
`Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health
`
`Through:
`
`Tamara Johnson, MD, MS, Acting Team Leader, Maternal Health
`Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health
`
`Lynne P. Yao, MD, 0ND, Division Director
`Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health
`
`To:
`
`Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Products (DMEP)
`
`Drug/NDA:
`
`Jentadueto XR (linagliptin and metformin hydrochloride extended-release),
`NDA 208026
`
`Applicant:
`
`Boehringer Ingelheirn Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`Subject:
`
`Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling
`
`Indication:
`
`Treatment of adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
`
`Materials
`
`Reviewed:
`
`0 DPMH consult request dated July 31, 2015, DARRTS Reference ID 3800707.
`
`Sponsor’s submitted background package for NDA 208026, Linagliptin/Metformin XR
`0
`o DPMH review of pioglitazone products. March 9, 2016. Miriam Dinatale, DO. and
`Christos Mastroyannis, M.D. DARRTS Reference ID 3898973.
`
`0 DPMH addendum of pioglitazone products. April 28, 2016. Miriam Dinatale, DO. and
`Christos Mastroyannis, M.D. DARRTS Reference ID 3921521.
`
`Reference ID: 3924141
`
`

`

`Consult Question:
`DMEP requests DPMH to review the applicant’s proposed labeling and confirm that the PLLR
`format is acceptable.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`The Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Products (DMEP) consulted the Division of Pediatric
`and Maternal Health (DPMH) to provide input for appropriate labeling of the pregnancy and
`lactation subsections of Jentadueto XR labeling to comply with the Pregnancy and Lactation
`Labeling Rule format.
`
`REGULATORY HISTORY
`On July 27, 2015, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(BIPI), submitted a 505 (b)(1)
`New Drug Application (NDA 208026) for Jentadueto XR (linagliptin/metformin extended-
`release) for the proposed indication of treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The
`reference listed drugs include: Tradjenta (linagliptin), NDA 201280, approved May 2, 2011;
`Glumetza (metformin hydrochloride), NDA 021748, approved June 3, 2005, and Jentadueto
`(linagliptin/metformin), NDA 201281, approved January 30, 2012.
`
`BACKGROUND
`Diabetes and Pregnancy1,2,3,4,5,6,7
`Diabetes mellitus (DM) complicates approximately 4% of all pregnancies in the Unites States.
`Poorly controlled DM during pregnancy increases the risk for maternal complications,
`including diabetic ketoacidosis, preeclampsia, spontaneous abortions (SAB), preterm delivery,
`stillbirth and cesarean section (due to fetal macrosomia).
`
`Poorly controlled DM during pregnancy increases the risk for fetal malformations, including
`neural tube defects (anencephaly, open spina bifida, and holoprosencephaly), cardiovascular
`anomalies (ventricular septal defects and transposition of the great vessels), oral clefts,
`genitourinary abnormalities (absent kidneys, polycystic kidney, and double ureter), and sacral
`agenesis or caudal regression. The estimated background risk of major birth defects is 6-10%
`in women with pre-gestational diabetes with a HemoglobinA1c>7 and has been reported to be
`as high as 20-25% in women with a Hemoglobin A1c>10. In addition, poorly controlled DM
`may result in fetal complications, including macrosomia-related injuries (brachial plexus
`injury, hypoxia), fetal hypoglycemia, and respiratory distress. However, achieving and
`maintaining maternal euglycemia prior to conception and throughout pregnancy decreases the
`risk of adverse outcomes for both the mother and the infant.
`
`
`
`1 Mills JL. Malformations in infants of diabetic mothers. Teratology.1982:25;385-94
`2 Persson, M. and Fadi, H. Perinatal outcome in relation to fetal sex in offspring to mothers with pre-gestational and
`gestational diabetes- a population-based study. Diabetes Med. 2014; 31(9): 1047-54.
`3 www.cdc.gov. Problems of Diabetes in Pregnancy. Accessed 12/30/2015.
`4 ACOG Practice Bulletin: Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. 2005; 60:675-685.
`5 Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS) Fact Sheet. MotherToBaby.org. Accessed 3/9/2016.
`6 Allen, Victoria, et al. Teratology Associated with Pre-Existing and Gestational Diabetes. SOGC Practice
`Guidelines. 2007; 200: 927-934.
`7 E. Albert Reece, John C. Hobbins. Handbook of Clinical Obstetrics: The Fetus & Mother, Third Edition. 2007.
`Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
`
`Reference ID: 3924141
`
`

`

`Linagliptin and Drug Characteristics8
`Linagliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor. DPP-4 is an enzyme that degrades the
`incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic
`polypeptide (GIP). Linagliptin increases the concentrations of active incretin hormones,
`stimulates the release of insulin and decreases the levels of glucagon. Linagliptin has a
`molecular weight of 472 Daltons, is 70-80% protein bound and has a half-life of 12 hours.9
`
`Metformin and Drug Characteristics10
`Metformin is a biguanide that improves glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes by
`lowering basal and postprandial plasma glucose. Metformin decreases hepatic glucose
`production, decreases intestinal absorption of glucose and improves insulin sensitivity by
`increasing peripheral glucose uptake and utilization. Metformin has a molecular weight of
`165.65 Daltons, a plasma elimination half-life of six hours, and does not bind to proteins. Serious
`adverse events that have occurred with use of metformin include: lactic acidosis and impairment
`of renal function.
`
`Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling
`On June 30, 2015, the “Content and Format of Labeling for Human Prescription Drug and
`Biological Products; Requirements for Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling,”11 also known as the
`Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR) went into effect. The PLLR requirements
`include a change to the structure and content of labeling for human prescription drug and
`biologic products with regard to pregnancy and lactation and create a new subsection for
`information with regard to females and males of reproductive potential. Specifically, the
`pregnancy categories (A, B, C, D and X) are removed from all prescription drug and biological
`product labeling and a new format is required for all products that are subject to the 2006
`Physicians Labeling Rule12 format to include information about the risks and benefits of using
`these products during pregnancy and lactation.
`
`LITERATURE REVIEW
`Nonclinical Experience
`In animal reproduction studies performed with linagliptin/metformin administered to pregnant
`rats during the period of organogenesis at doses similar to clinical exposure, there was no
`evidence of adverse developmental effects. There was no evidence of adverse developmental
`effects with administration of linagliptin to pregnant rats and rabbits during the period of
`organogenesis at doses 943 and 1943-times, respectively, the clinical dose. In addition, there
`was no evidence of adverse developmental effects with administration of metformin to pregnant
`rats and rabbits during the period of organogenesis at doses 3 and 6- times the maximum
`recommended human dose, respectively. The reader is referred to the full
`Pharmacology/Toxicology review by David Carlson, Ph.D.
`
`
`8 Tradjenta (linagliptin) Labeling. Section 12: Clinical Pharmacology. Drugs @FDA. Accessed 10/29/2015
`9 http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/db00422. Accessed 2/16/2015
`10 Glumetza (metformin hydrochloride XR) Labeling. Section 12: Clinical Pharmacology. Drugs @FDA. Accessed
`10/29/2015
`11 Content and Format of Labeling for Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products, Requirements for
`Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling (79 FR 72063, December 4, 2014).
`12 Requirements on Content and Format of Labeling for Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products,
`published in the Federal Register (71 FR 3922; January 24, 2006).
`
`Reference ID: 3924141
`
`

`

`Linagliptin and Pregnancy
`The applicant performed a literature search in Medline and Embase covering the period between
`1995 and August 24, 2015 to identify published literature on pregnancy-related publications for
`linagliptin/metformin or linagliptin. However, there was no relevant information that discussed
`the use of linagliptin during pregnancy.
`
`In clinical trials, there were four cases of exposure to linagliptin/metformin during pregnancy.
`The pregnancy outcomes were known in three out of the four cases and included three elective
`abortions (one due to holoprosencephaly, one due to the absence of a fetal heartbeat, no reason
`identified for the third abortion).
`
`In addition, there were two reports of pregnancy during linagliptin or linagliptin/metformin use
`in the Boehringer Ingelheim global safety database. In one case the father was exposed to
`linagliptin/metformin during conception, but the outcome of the pregnancy was not known. In
`the second case, a female patient was exposed to linagliptin/metformin and was switched to
`insulin half-way through her pregnancy. She had a normal fetal ultrasound, and the outcome of
`the pregnancy was not reported.13
`
`In addition to the search of published literature and pharmacovigilance databases performed by
`the applicant, DPMH also conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase and the TERIS
`and ReproTox databases14 for linagliptin and use in pregnancy. No adequate and well-controlled
`studies of linagliptin have been conducted in pregnant women, and there were no additional
`human data that discussed the use of linagliptin during pregnancy.
`
`Linagliptin and Lactation
`Nonclinical studies demonstrated that linagliptin is present in the milk of lactating rats in a 4:1
`ratio to plasma.
`
`No exposure to infants during breastfeeding was reported during the clinical trials for linagliptin.
`In addition to the search of published literature and pharmacovigilance databases performed by
`the applicant, DPMH also performed a search of the Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed)15
`and PubMed. There is no information in published literature about the use of linagliptin (or
`other drugs in the same class) during breastfeeding. LactMed states the following:
`
`
`Because no information is available on the use of linagliptin during breastfeeding, an
`alternate drug may be preferred, especially while nursing a newborn or preterm infant.
`
`
`Summary
`Linagliptin is present in rat milk at up to four-fold higher concentration in maternal milk than
`plasma. Drug presence and accumulation in breast milk is species specific; therefore, no direct
`
`
`13 Boehringer Ingelheim. Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report. May 3, 2014 to May 2, 2015.
`14 TERIS and ReproTox databases, Truven Health Analytics, Micromedex Solutions, 2016.
`15 http://toxnet nlm nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?LACT. The LactMed database is a National Library of Medicine
`(NLM) database with information on drugs and lactation geared toward healthcare practitioners and nursing women.
`The LactMed database provides information when available on maternal levels in breast milk, infant blood levels,
`any potential effects in the breastfed infants if known, alternative drugs that can be considered and the American
`Academy of Pediatrics category indicating the level of compatibility of the drug with breastfeeding.
`
`Reference ID: 3924141
`
`

`

`relationship can be made in humans. However, the rat data appear to support active transport of
`drug into milk because the levels are higher in milk compared to plasma. Linagliptin has a low
`molecular weight (472 Daltons), a long half-life (12 hours), and low protein-binding (70-80%),
`characteristics that all may increase the likelihood that the drug is transferred into breast milk.16
`Current Tradjenta (linagliptin) labeling17 notes that “caution should be exercised when Tradjenta
`is administered to a nursing woman.”
`
`Based on recent DPMH recommendations for another DDP4 (alogliptin)18 and given the lack of
`lactation information for linagliptin, DPMH recommends that the following statement appear in
`the “Risk Summary” section of Jentadueto XR labeling:
`The developmental and health benefits of breastfeeding should be considered along with the
`mother’s clinical need for JENTADUETO XR and any potential adverse effects on the
`breastfed
` from JENTADUETO XR or from the underlying maternal condition.
`
`
`Linagliptin and Females and Males of Reproductive Potential
`In animal fertility studies in rats given linagliptin at doses 943-times the clinical dose based on
`the Area under the Curve (AUC) exposure, there was no evidence of impaired fertility.19 The
`applicant performed a literature review of Medline, Embase and PubMed to identify reports of
`reproductive toxicity with linagliptin and linagliptin/metformin use in humans, and no reports of
`reproductive toxicity were found.
`
`In addition to the search of published literature performed by the applicant, DPMH also
`conducted a review of published literature in PubMed and Embase to evaluate the use of
`linagliptin and its effects on fertility. No additional data were found.
`
`Summary
`There are no human data on the effects of linagliptin on fertility and no evidence of infertility
`in animal studies to inform a potential clinical risk.
`
`Metformin and Pregnancy
`Metformin is primarily used in women with pre-gestational diabetes and off-label in women with
`polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) for infertility. For treatment of pre-gestational diabetes,
`metformin is often continued during pregnancy and insulin is added as appropriate to the therapy
`regimen. In women with PCOS, metformin is often continued until the end of the first trimester,
`with only limited evidence to suggest that such use decreases the risks of adverse pregnancy
`outcomes, including first-trimester loss.20 Metformin use in women with gestational diabetes and
`PCOS has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
`
`
`16 Nice, F and Luo, Amy. Medications and breast-feeding: Current Concepts. Journal of the American Pharmacists
`Association. 2012; 51 (1): 86-94.
`17 Drugs@FDA. Tradjenta (linagliptin) Labeling. Section 8.3, Nursing Mothers. Accessed 3/25/2016.
`18 DPMH addendum of pioglitazone products. April 28, 2016. Miriam Dinatale, D.O. and Christos Mastroyannis,
`M.D. DARRTS Reference ID 3921521.
`19 Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc proposed Jentadueto XR Labeling: Section 13, Nonclinical
`Toxicology.
`20 De Leo, et al. The administration of metformin during pregnancy reduces polycystic ovary syndrome related
`gestational complications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 157:63–6.
`
`Reference ID: 3924141
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`The applicant performed a literature search in Medline and Embase covering the period between
`1995 and August 24, 2015 to identify published literature on pregnancy-related publications for
`the linagliptin and metformin combination or metformin alone. The search retrieved a total of
`483 publications related to metformin monotherapy in pregnancy and reviewed 34 relevant
`articles. In addition to the applicant’s search of published literature for information about
`metformin use during pregnancy, DPMH also conducted a literature search in PubMed, Embase,
`ReproTox, and TERIS. The results of the literature search are described below.
`
`Metformin use in Gestational Diabetes
`Overall, published literature that has evaluated metformin use for gestational diabetes has shown
`no clear association between metformin use in pregnancy and adverse maternal or fetal
`outcomes. 21,22,23 The Metformin in Gestational Diabetes (MiG) trial was a large (n=751)
`randomized, open label trial comparing the use of metformin versus insulin in the treatment of
`gestational diabetes. The primary focus of the study was on neonatal outcomes. There was no
`significant difference in the primary composite outcome (neonatal hypoglycemia, respiratory
`distress, phototherapy need, birth trauma, 5 minute APGAR score <7 and prematurity) between
`the two arms (32% metformin vs 32.2% insulin [p=0.95], RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.8-1.23). There
`were more incidences of neonatal severe hypoglycemia (BG levels <28.8mg/dL) with insulin
`compared to metformin (8.1% vs 3.3%, p=0.008). There was a significant increase in the
`number of preterm births (<37 weeks gestation) with metformin compared to insulin (12.1% vs
`7.6%, p=0.04). However, there was minimal clinical difference in mean gestational age between
`the two agents (38.3 weeks with metformin versus 38.5 weeks with insulin).24
`
`Since the MiG trial, nine other metformin studies (randomized control trials, case-control trials
`and observational studies) in women with gestational diabetes have been published. Six trials
`compared metformin to insulin25,26,27,28,29,30and three trials compared metformin to
`glyburide.31,32,33 For all but one of the studies that compared insulin to metformin [24, 25, 26,
`
`
`21 Langer, et al. There is no association between oral hypoglycemic use and fetal anomalies. Am J Obstet Gynecol
`1999;180:S38
`22 Nicholson W, Bolen S, Witkop CT, Neale D, Wilson L, Bass E. Benefits and risks of oral diabetes agents
`compared with insulin in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:193–205.
`23 Carrol, D., Kelley, K.: Review of metformin and glyburide in the management of gestational diabetes. Pharm
`Pract (Granada). 2014 Oct-Dec; 12(4): 528
`24 Rowan, J. et al. Metformin versus Insulin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes. The New England Journal of
`Medicine. 2008; 358: 2003-2015.
`25 Tertti, et al. Comparison of metformin and insulin in the treatment of gestational diabetes: a retrospective case-
`control study. Rev Diabet Stu. 2008; 5 (2): 95-101.
`26 Balani, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes treated with metformin or insulin: a case-
`control study. Diabet Med. 2009; 26 (8):798–802.
`27 Ijäs, et al. Metformin should be considered in the treatment of gestational diabetes: a prospective
`randomised study. BJOG. 2011; 118(7):880–885.
`28 Niromanesh, et al. Metformin compared with insulin in the management of gestational diabetes: a randomized
`clinical trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;98(3):422–9.
`29 Tertti K, et al. Metformin vs insulin in gestational diabetes. A randomized study characterizing metformin
`patients needing additional insulin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(3):246–251.
`30 Spaulonci, et al. Randomized trial of metformin vs insulin in the management of gestational diabetes. Am J
`Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 209(1):34.e1–7.
`31 Silva, et al. Metformin compared to glyburide for the management of gestational diabetes. Int J Gynaecol
`Obstet. 2010;111(1):37–40.
`
`Reference ID: 3924141
`
`

`

`27, 29], there were no differences in birth weight, gestational age, mode of delivery, prematurity
`or perinatal deaths. One trial [28] reported more infants with birth weights >90th percentile (35%
`versus 17.5%, p=0.012) and higher birth weights (3.4 kg versus 3.3kg, p-value= 0.005) in the
`insulin group compared to the metformin group. For trials that compared metformin to
`glyburide, there was no difference in maternal blood glucose, neonatal hypoglycemia,
`macrosomia or gestational age of delivery.
`
`The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) recently updated its position
`statement regarding the use of oral medications in the treatment of gestational diabetes and noted
`that both glyburide and metformin have favorable safety profiles.34
`
`Metformin Use in PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
`Data from PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (i.e., DM that was present prior to pregnancy)
`studies provide information on the effects of metformin use in the first trimester of pregnancy.
`Published observational studies do not report a clear association with metformin use in the first
`trimester of pregnancy and major birth defects, miscarriage or adverse perinatal outcomes
`(decreased fetal growth, neonatal hypoglycemia).35,36,37,38,39,40
`
`There are two studies that have demonstrated an increase in complications with metformin use
`during pregnancy.
`
`In a retrospective cohort study (Hellmuth, et al), the authors found that the prevalence of
`pre-eclampsia was increased in the metformin group compared to the sulfonylurea and
`insulin groups (32% versus 7% versus 10%, p-value <0.001). There was also an increase
`in perinatal mortality in the metformin group versus women not treated with metformin
`(11.6% versus 1.3%, p-value <0.02).41
`In a multicenter, observational prospective cohort study (Panchaud, et al.), major
`congenital anomalies were more frequent among the infants of 323 women who had used
`metformin during pregnancy than among control infants (7.6% vs. 2.5% respectively;
`odds ratio=3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.3-9.2, p=0.005). However, the authors noted
`that there is a potential for confounding effects of the underlying metabolic disease and
`
`32 Moore, et al. Metformin compared with glyburide in gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(1):55–59.
`33 Silva JC, Fachin DR, Coral ML, Bertini AM. Perinatal impact of the use of metformin and glyburide for the
`treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Perinat Med. 2012;40(3):225–228.
`34 Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics. Obstet
`Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):406-16
`35 Bolton, et al. Continuation of metformin in the first trimester of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome is not
`associated with increased perinatal morbidity. Eur J Pediatr.2009;168(2):203–206
`36 Gilbert C, Valois M, Koren G. Pregnancy outcomes after first trimester exposure to metformin: a meta-
`analysis. Fertil Steril. 2006 Sep;86(3):658–663
`37 Briggs GG, editor. 9th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. Metformin. Drugs in
`Pregnancy and Lactation; pp. 912–915
`38 Diav-Citrin, O.; Steinmetz-Shoob, S.; Shechtman, S. and Ornoy, A.: Pregnancy outcome following in utero
`exposure to metformin: A prospective comparative observational study. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol.
`100(7):520, 2014
`39 Glueck CJ, et al. Pregnancy outcomes among women with polycystic ovary syndrome treated with metformin.
`Hum Reprod. 2002 Nov;17(11):2858-64.
`40 Coetzee, E.J. and Jackson, W.P.U.: Oral hypoglycemics in the first trimester and fetal outcome. S. Afr. Med. J.
`65:635-637, 1984
`41 Hellmuth, et al. Oral hypoglycaemic agents in 118 diabetic pregnancies. Diabetic Medicine. 2000; 17: 507-511.
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3924141
`
`

`

`that further data collection and analysis of potential bias was being undertaken at the time
`the results of the study were published. 42
`
`
`Reviewer comments:
`In the study by Hellmuth, et al. the women in the metformin group were more likely to be obese
`(pre-pregnancy BMI was 31.2 compared to 22.8 and 24.8 in the sulfonylurea and insulin groups,
`respectively). An obese or overweight patient with type 2 diabetes is at an increased risk of
`preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia, preterm delivery, large-for-gestational age
`infant, fetal malformations and admission of the infant into the neonatal intensive care unit.
`Therefore, it is difficult to determine whether the increased prevalence of pre-eclampsia was due
`to metformin use or due to obesity.43,44
`
`In the study by Panchaud, et al., the metformin-exposed population was made up of patients with
`pre-gestational diabetes, but the control population was made up of non-diabetic patients.
`Having a diabetes diagnosis increases the risk of congenital malformations, and it is likely that
`increased rate of congenital malformations seen in the metformin-exposed pregnancies was due
`to the underlying diabetes and not necessarily due to metformin use during pregnancy.
`
`See the previous DPMH reviews45,46 by Miriam Dinatale, D.O. and Christos Mastroyannis, M.D.
`for a complete review of published studies that evaluated the use of metformin during pregnancy.
`
`Summary
`Overall, published safety data from controlled trials and post-marketing observational studies do
`not report a clear association with major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal
`outcomes when metformin is used during pregnancy. However, these studies cannot definitely
`establish the absence of any risk because of methodological limitations, including small sample
`size and inconsistent comparator groups.
`
`Metformin and Lactation
`The applicant performed a literature search in Medline and Embase covering the period between
`1995 and August 24, 2015 to identify published literature on lactation-related publications for
`metformin and retrieved two publications. In addition to the applicant’s search of published
`literature for information about metformin use during lactation, DPMH also performed a search
`of the Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed)47 and PubMed and Embase.
`
`
`42 Panchaud, A et al. Pregnancy outcome following maternal exposure to metformin: Preliminary results of a
`collaborative ENTIS and Motherisk study. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 100(7):521, 2014
`43 www.cdc.gov. Reproductive Health: Maternal and Infant Health and Pregnancy Complications. Accessed
`12/18/2015.
`44 Racusin, et al. Obesity and the Risk and Detection of Fetal Malformations. Seminars in Perinatology. 2012; 36(3):
`213-221.
`45 DPMH review of pioglitazone products. March 9, 2016. Miriam Dinatale, D.O. and Christos Mastroyannis, M.D.
`DARRTS Reference ID 3898973.
`46 DPMH addendum of pioglitazone products. April 28, 2016. Miriam Dinatale, D.O. and Christos Mastroyannis,
`M.D. DARRTS Reference ID 3921521.
`47 http://toxnet nlm nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?LACT. The LactMed database is a National Library of Medicine
`(NLM) database with information on drugs and lactation geared toward healthcare practitioners and nursing women.
`The LactMed database provides information when available on maternal levels in breast milk, infant blood levels,
`
`Reference ID: 3924141
`
`

`

`LactMed notes that data from clinical lactation studies demonstrate that metformin levels in
`breast milk are low and that “metformin should be used with caution when women are
`breastfeeding neonates and premature infants, especially those with renal impairment.”
`
`In a lactation study (Eyal, et al.), breast milk samples were collected from four women with
`either PCOS or diabetes (Type 2 diabetes mellitus or gestational diabetes) who were treated with
`metformin (1500 mg/day in one patient; 2000 mg/day in three patients) in the post-partum
`period. The amounts of me

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket