throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`208026Orig1s000
`
`SUMMARY REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`Cross—Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`
`Date
`23 May 2016
`Lisa Yanoff, M.D.
`Cross-Disci 0 line Team Leader Review
`Sub'ect
`NDA/BLA # 208026
`A .
`u licant
`
`From
`
`
`
`
` Jentadueto XR/
`
`Boehrin - er In - elheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`27 Jul 2015
`Date of Submission
`
`PDUFA Goal Date
`27 May 2016
`
`Proprietary Name /
`Established
`S ‘
`
`Dosage forms / Strength
`
`Lina li tin and metformin h drochloride extended—release
`
`Oral tablets with the following dosage strengths:
`5 mg linagliptin/ 1000 mg metformin hydrochloride
`extended-release
`
`2.5 mg linagliptin/1000 mg metformin hydrochloride
`extended—release
`
`Proposed Indication(s)
`
`as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic
`control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus when
`treatment with both linagliptin and metformin is
`a to riate
`
`Recommended:
`
`A roval
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`Reference ID: 3937675
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`1. Introduction
`Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is submitting a New Drug Application (NDA)
`#208026 under section 505(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for the fixed-
`combination drug product linagliptin /metformin hydrochloride extended-release for the
`treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
`
`The regulatory pathway through section 505(b)(1) is appropriate because the Applicant is the
`sponsor of the linagliptin product (Tradjenta, NDA 201280) and provides a Letter of
`Authorization from the sponsor of the metformin extended-release product (Glumetza, NDA
`021748).
`
`The proposed indication is an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in
`adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus when treatment with both linagliptin and metformin is
`appropriate.
`2. Background and Application Overview
`
`The NDA is for linagliptin/metformin extended release, a fixed combination drug [also known
`as a fixed-dose combination (FDC)] of linagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4-i)
`and metformin, the only member of the biguanide class. Both components are approved in the
`U.S. as individual products, and an immediate release formulation of the combination is also
`approved in the U.S. and marketed as Jentadueto. The proposed trade name Jentadueto XR
`has been determined to be acceptable by the Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology
`Products and by the Division of Medication Error and Prevention Analysis and will be used
`interchangeably with the nonproprietary name throughout this memo.
`
`Linagliptin is the third DPP4-i approved in the U.S. Linagliptin improves glycemic control in
`patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by inhibiting the inactivation of GLP-1 and GIP
`(incretin hormones) and prolonging the incretin effect on beta cells (serum glucose-dependent
`insulin stimulation) and alpha cells (glucagon suppression). GLP-1 in particular has other
`effects that contribute to improved glucose control in diabetics, such as appetite suppression
`and slowing of the rate of gastric emptying. Linagliptin is dosed at 5 mg once daily.
`
`Metformin is effective in decreasing hepatic glucose output and decreasing peripheral glucose
`utilization. Metformin gained a first-line treatment recommendation by the American Diabetes
`Association and other diabetes professional organizations, and is widely used in the treatment
`of T2DM. The Prescribing Information for Glumetza (metformin XR) states that ‘in general,
`clinically significant responses are not seen at doses below 1500 mg per day. However, a
`lower recommended starting dose and gradually increased dosage is advised to minimize
`gastrointestinal symptoms. The starting dose of GLUMETZA is 1000 mg once daily which in
`order to maximize therapeutic efficacy must be taken with food preferably in the evening.
`Dosage increases should be made in increments of 500 mg weekly, up to a maximum of 2000
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`Reference ID: 3937675
`
`2
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`mg once daily with the evening meal. lfglycemic control is not achieved on GL UMEIZA 2000
`mg once daily, a trial ofGL UMEIZA 1000 mg twice daily should be considered. ’
`
`The proposed strengths for Jentadueto XR are 5 mg linagliptin/1000 mg metformin
`hydrochloride extended-release 2.5 mg linagliptin/1000 mg metformin hydrochloride
`extended-release. The proposed dosing regimen is as follows:
`
`0
`
`o
`
`o
`
`in patients currently not treated with metformin, initiate treatment with 5 mg
`linagliptin/1000 g metformin hydrochloride extended-release once daily
`
`(w)
`
`(5)“) total daily starting dose
`In patients already treated with metformin, the
`of JENTADUETO XR is 5 mg linagliptin and a similar total daily dose of metformin
`In patients already treated with TRADJENTA and metformin or JENTADUETO
`switch to JENTADUETO XR containing 5 mg of linagliptin total daily dose and a
`similar total daily dose of metformin
`
`In addition to adequate clinical trial data, approval of an FDC for the treatment of T2DM is
`dependent on demonstration of bioequivalence (BE) of the FDC and the two individual
`components administered together. With demonstration of BB, the precedent within the
`Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products for products containing metformin
`combined with another oral antidiabetic agent is to then approve the FDC for either a ‘narrow’
`indication (e.g. patients who are not adequately controlled on a regimen containing meflormin
`or linagliptin, or in patients who are already treated with both linagliptin and metformin) or a
`‘broad’ indication (e.g. when treatment with both linagliptin and meformin is appropriate).
`The narrow indication is typically granted based on clinical trial data showing additional
`placebo-adjusted glycemic lowering from the second drug (e.g. linagliptin) to metformin. To
`allow treatment with the FDC in patients who are treatment naive, the applicant must show
`that the coadministration (or alternatively, the FDC) is more effective than each component
`alone, in patients not treated with either drug prior to the trial, i.e. show contribution of
`claimed effect of each component as per 21CFR 300.50. The typical approach is to conduct a
`factorial study with each of the single agents being compared to the combination; such a study
`was submitted with the original Jentadueto NDA and was used to support the initial approval
`of Jentadueto with the broader indication.
`
`The basis for the request for approval of the proposed (broad) indication for Jentadueto XR is
`the following:
`
`0 Results of the pivotal bioequivalence (BE) studies
`
`0 Clinical comparability between metformin twice daily (Glucophage) and once daily
`(Glumetza) shown in the original NDA for Glumetza
`o The efficacy and safety of co-administration of linagliptin and metformin twice daily
`(Glucophage) as add-on to metformin in the original Tradjenta NDA and as initial
`therapy in the factorial study 1218.46 submitted to support the approval of Jentadueto
`for the ‘broad’ indication
`
`This summary memo contains a high—level overview of the important review findings of the
`NDA. Please see the individual reviews for each discipline for detailed discussions. This
`memo references the following documents.
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`Reference ID: 3937675
`
`3
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`Subject
`
`Author
`
`Date in DARRTS
`
`Clinical Pharmacology (OCP) Dr. Sang Chung and Dr.
`review
`Mano' Khurana
`
`27 Apr 2016
`
`Chemistry Manufacturing and Team review, Technical
`Controls Quali
`review
`Lead Dr. Suon Tran
`
`18 Apr 2016 (in
`Panorama
`
`Clinical Efficacy and Safety
`Review
`
`Nonclinical review
`' harmacolo 3 Itoxicolo 3
`
`Division of Pediatric and
`Maternal Health consult
`
`Office of Study Integrity and
`Surveillance inspection
`reviews
`
`Dr. Hyon Kwon
`
`18 May 2016
`
`Dr. David Carlson
`
`20 Apr 2016
`
`Dr. Miriam Dinatale
`
`28 Apr 2016
`
`Dr. Li-Hong Paul Yeh
`
`19 Feb 2016, 11 Mar
`2016, 15 Mar 2016
`
`
`
`Division of Medication Error
`Prevention and Analysis
`consult review
`
`Dr. Sarah Vee and Dr.
`Yelena Maslov
`
`29 Apr 2016
`
`Division of Medical Policy
`Programs (DMPP) consult
`review
`
`Team review
`
`5 May 2016
`
`3. CMC
`
`The recommendation from the Office of Pharmaceutical Quality (including the Overall
`Manufacturing Inspection Recommendation) is approval. NDA 201280 Tradjenta (linagliptin),
`by the same applicant, is referenced for all CMC information on the drug substance linagliptin.
`The NDA is cmrently approved and the reference is adequate. NDA 201281 Jentadueto
`(linagliptin/metformin HC1), by the same applicant, is referenced for all CMC information on
`the drug substance metformin HCl. The NDA is currently approved and the reference is
`adequate.
`
`The drug product is a fihn-coated tablet consisting of innnediate release linagliptin and
`extended release metformin BC], with two strengths: 5 mg/1000 mg and 2.5 mg/1000 mg
`linagliptin (immediate release)/metformin hydrochloride (extended release). Please see the
`Quality review for details.
`
`4. Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`Reference ID: 3937675
`
`4
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`The nonclinical pharmacology/toxicology reviewer Dr. David Carlson recommends approval
`of this NDA. No new nonclinical information was submitted to support the proposed
`linagliptin and metformin XR FDC tablets. Nonclinical support for the safety of the proposed
`FDC tablets is claimed from cross referencing information in approved drug products. As
`noted above the drug substances in the proposed FDC tablets are identical to those previously
`approved. Nonclinical review of the drug product excipients and specifications independently
`verified that there are no new excipients or impurities in the proposed drug product. Please see
`Dr. Carlson’s review for details.
`5. Clinical Pharmacology/Biopharmaceutics
`
`The clinical pharmacology reviewer Dr. Sang Chung recommends approval of this NDA. The
`applicant conducted two pivotal BE studies because there are two proposed strengths for
`Jentadueto XR under fasted or fed conditions. According to Dr. Chung, BE was demonstrated
`for both strengths of Jentadueto XR referencing corresponding co-administration of Tradjenta
`and Glumetza under both fasted and fed conditions.
`
`The data from these two studies are shown below.
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`Reference ID: 3937675
`
`5
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`Source: Clinical Pharmacology review
`
`Dr. Chung noted no concerns with the study methodology. Site inspections were also
`acceptable (see section 11 of this memo). I agree with Dr. Chung that the pivotal BE study
`results support approval of this NDA.
`6. Clinical Microbiology
`
`Please see the Quality review
`
`7. Clinical/Statistical- Efficacy
`
`The basis for establishment of efficacy for Jentadueto XR is the previous review and approval
`of Jentadueto. No clinical efficacy i.e. Phase 3 studies were submitted with this NDA.
`
`8. Safety
`
`The basis for the safety evaluation of Jentadueto XR is the previous review and approval of
`Jentadueto. Dr. Kwon’s safety review included review of narratives for all subjects who
`discontinued from the Phase 1 studies due to adverse events and who had serious adverse
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`Reference ID: 3937675
`
`6
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`events, the most recent postmarketing safety data submitted with the application, and data
`from the 4-month safety update. The safety review did not identify any new safety issues with
`use of the combination. Please see her review for details.
`
`9. Advisory Committee Meeting
`
`No advisory committee meeting was convened for this sNDA.
`10.
`Pediatrics
`
`Because this product is a new formulation of the combination of linagliptin and metformin
`from that approved previously, the product approval does trigger requirements under the
`Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA). In keeping with usual practice, the PREA
`requirements for the linagliptin monotherapy product (1766-1 and 1766-2) will apply to the
`NDA for the combination product.
`
`Of note, the Division is considering a release and reissue of the monotherapy PREA PMR
`1766-2 in order to update the PMR description to reflect current agreements regarding protocol
`design (i.e., linagliptin and another antidiabetic product from this sponsor [empagliflozin] both
`on a background of metformin will be compared against a single placebo arm). This trial
`design was agreed upon by the Division and by the Pediatric Review Committee (PeRC) and is
`reflected in the iPSP for NDA 208026.
`
`11.
`
`Other Relevant Regulatory Issues
`
`The Office of Study Integrity and Surveillance (OSIS) conducted an inspection of the
`bioanalytical portion of studies 1288-9 and 1288-11
`This was determined to be acceptable. See review in DARRTS dated 15 Mar 2016.
`
`.
`
`OSIS also conducted an inspection of the bioanalytical portion of studies 1288-9 and 1288-11
`. The final classification for
` is
`voluntary action indicated (VAI). OSIS concluded that data from this study are acceptable for
`review. See review in DARRTS dated 19 Feb 2016.
`
`OSIS also conducted clinical inspection at Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, KG,
`Biberach/Riss, where clinical portions of the BE studies were carried out. This inspection also
`found no issues and reported the pivotal BE data are acceptable for review. See review in
`DARRTS dated 11 Mar 2016.
`
`12.
`
`Labeling
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`Reference ID: 3937675
`
`7
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`Labeling for Jentadueto XR for the most part should follow labeling of the Jentadueto product.
`Two unique issues are as follows:
`
`Compliance with the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR):
`The proposed label for Jentadueto XR differs from the Jentadueto product in that it proposes
`new language to conform to the PLLR format. A consult from the Division of Pediatric and
`Maternal Health was requested by the Division for input on the labeling. Please see Dr.
`Miriam Dinatale’s review in DARRTS. Development of the PLLR language was an evolving
`process and the approved label will contain the final agreed upon language.
`
`A line-by-line labeling reviewed will be conducted separately.
`
`The Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis reviewed the carton and container
`labeling and determined it to be acceptable. See review in DARRTS.
`
`The Division of Medical Policy Programs (DMPP) reviewed the Medication Guide.
`
`13.
`
`Recommendations/Risk Benefit Assessment
`
` Recommended Regulatory Action
`
`Approval
`
` Risk Benefit Assessment
`
`The clinical efficacy and safety of the individual components in the proposed fixed
`combination of linagliptin and metformin XR have been established in the Tradjenta and
`Glumetza NDAs, respectively. The efficacy and safety of linagliptin given once daily as add-
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`Reference ID: 3937675
`
`8
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`on to metformin given twice daily was demonstrated using adequate and well-controlled Phase
`3 studies in the original NDA for Tradjenta (linagliptin). The efficacy and safety of once daily
`metformin XR was comparable to metformin IR twice daily in the Glumetza NDA. In
`addition, the contribution to glycemic lowering of each of the individual components was
`demonstrated in an adequate and well-controlled factorial study in treatment naïve patients and
`submitted to support approval of Jentadueto for the ‘broad’ indication.
`
`Therefore, the data submitted to support the proposed linagliptin/metformin XR product were
`from relative bioavailability studies designed to bridge the existing clinical efficacy and safety
`data by demonstrating bioequivalence (BE) of each fixed-combination tablet to the co-
`administered free combinations of the individual components.
`
`The pivotal BE studies demonstrated that both proposed strengths of the linagliptin/metformin
`XR FDC were bioequivalent to the combination of individual components under both fasted
`and fed conditions. Hence, the overall data submitted with this NDA support approval.
`
` Recommendation for Postmarketing Risk Evaluation and Management Strategies
`
`None
`
`None
`
` Recommendation for other Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments
`
` Recommended Comments to Applicant
`
`Labeling comments will be communicated to the applicant separately.
`
`Page 9 of 9
`
`Reference ID: 3937675
`
`9
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`LISA B YANOFF
`05/26/2016
`
`JEAN-MARC P GUETTIER
`05/27/2016
`I concur. Dr. Yanoff's review serves as the Divisional Summary memo for this application.
`Efficacy and safety of linagliptin and metformin co-administration was established with data from
`new drug applications 201280 and 201281. The product in this application combines linagliptin
`with the extended release version of metformin and has met the requirements under 21 CFR
`300.50. There are no issues that preclude approval.
`
`Reference ID: 3937675
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket