throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`207202Orig1s000
`
`CLINICAL REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`
`CLINICAL REVIEW
`
`Application Type NDA
`Application Number(s) 207202
`Priority or Standard Standard
`
`
`Submit Date(s) 04/21/2017
`Received Date(s) 04/21/2017
`PDUFA Goal Date 10/21/2017
`Division/Office DPP/ODE1
`
`
`Reviewer Name(s) Daniel J. Lee, MD
`Review Completion Date 10/26/2017
`
`
`Established Name aripiprazole
`(Proposed) Trade Name Abilify Mycite
`Applicant Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization,
`Inc
`
`
`Formulation(s) Oral tablet, 2 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg
`Dosing Regimen once daily
`Proposed Indication(s)
`
`Intended Population(s)
`
`
`
`
`
`Recommendation on
`Regulatory Action
`Recommended
`Indication(s) (if applicable)
`
`
`Approve
`
`schizophrenia, acute treatment of manic and mixed episodes
`associated with bipolar I disorder, bipolar I maintenance, and
`adjunctive treatment of major depression
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`1
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Glossary ........................................................................................................................................... 7
`
`1
`
`Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 9
`
` Product Introduction ........................................................................................................ 9
`
` Conclusions on the Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness .............................................. 9
`
` Benefit-Risk Assessment ................................................................................................ 10
`
`2
`
`Therapeutic Context .............................................................................................................. 15
`
` Analysis of Condition ...................................................................................................... 15
`
` Analysis of Current Treatment Options ......................................................................... 15
`
`3
`
`Regulatory Background ......................................................................................................... 15
`
` U.S. Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ............................................................. 15
`
`
`
`
`
`Summary of Pre-Submission/Submission Regulatory Activity ....................................... 16
`
`Foreign Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ....................................................... 16
`
`4
`
`Significant Issues from Other Review Disciplines Pertinent to Clinical Conclusions on
`Efficacy and Safety................................................................................................................. 17
`
` Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI) .......................................................................... 17
`
` Product Quality .............................................................................................................. 17
`
` Clinical Microbiology ...................................................................................................... 17
`
` Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology ........................................................................... 17
`
` Clinical Pharmacology .................................................................................................... 17
`
` Mechanism of Action .............................................................................................. 17
`
` Pharmacodynamics ................................................................................................. 17
`
` Pharmacokinetics .................................................................................................... 17
`
` Devices and Companion Diagnostic Issues .................................................................... 18
`
` Consumer Study Reviews ............................................................................................... 18
`
`5
`
`Sources of Clinical Data and Review Strategy ....................................................................... 18
`
` Review Strategy .............................................................................................................. 20
`
`6
`
`Review of Relevant Individual Trials Used to Support Efficacy ............................................. 20
`
` MIND1 System 2016 Human Factors Patient Interface Validation [DC-001576] .......... 20
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`2
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`
` Study Design............................................................................................................ 20
`
` Study Results ........................................................................................................... 21
`
`Table 3: Demographic Information Tracked by Applicant ........................................................ 23
`
` Trials Reviewed During the First Review Cycle .............................................................. 26
`
` Confounding in Repeat-Dose Trials ........................................................................ 26
`
`7
`
`Integrated Review of Effectiveness ....................................................................................... 26
`
` Assessment of Efficacy Across Trials .............................................................................. 26
`
` Additional Efficacy Considerations ................................................................................. 26
`
` Considerations on Benefit in the Post-Market Setting ........................................... 26
`
` Other Relevant Benefits .......................................................................................... 26
`
`
`
`Integrated Assessment of Effectiveness ........................................................................ 26
`
`8
`
`Review of Safety .................................................................................................................... 26
`
`
`
`Safety Review Approach ................................................................................................ 27
`
`The submitted trial contained no safety data. ......................................................................... 27
`
` Adequacy of Applicant’s Clinical Safety Assessments .................................................... 27
`
` Issues Regarding Data Integrity and Submission Quality ....................................... 27
`
` Categorization of Adverse Events ........................................................................... 27
`
` Routine Clinical Tests .............................................................................................. 27
`
`The submitted trial contained no safety data. ......................................................................... 27
`
`
`
`
`
`Safety Results ................................................................................................................. 27
`
` Infection Risk ........................................................................................................... 27
`
`Safety in the Post-Market Setting .................................................................................. 28
`
` Safety Concerns Identified Through Post-Market Experience ............................... 28
`
` Expectations on Safety in the Post-Market Setting ................................................ 29
`
` Additional Safety Issues from Other Disciplines ............................................................ 29
`
`
`
`Integrated Assessment of Safety ................................................................................... 29
`
`9 Advisory Committee Meeting and Other External Consultations ......................................... 29
`
`10 Labeling Recommendations .................................................................................................. 29
`
`
`
`Prescribing Information .............................................................................................. 29
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`3
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patient Labeling .......................................................................................................... 30
`
`Non-Prescription Labeling .......................................................................................... 30
`
`11 Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) ................................................................ 30
`
`12 Appendices ............................................................................................................................ 31
`
`References .................................................................................................................. 31
`
`Financial Disclosure .................................................................................................... 31
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`4
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`
`Table of Tables
`Table 1: Summary of FDA-Approved Long-Acting Antipsychotics................................................15
`Table 2: Table of Clinical Studies..................................................................................................19
`Table 3: Demographic Information Tracked by Applicant............................................................23
`Table 4: Listing of All Participant Failures in DC-001576..............................................................24
`Table 5: Rates of Infection Noted in Repeat-Dose Abilify Mycite Trials.......................................28
`
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`5
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`
`Table of Figures
`
`
`None
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`6
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`
`Glossary
`
`
`AC
`
`AE
`
`BLA
`
`BPCA
`
`BRF
`
`CBER
`
`CDER
`
`CDRH
`
`CDTL
`
`CFR
`
`CMC
`COSTART
`CRF
`
`CRO
`
`CRT
`
`CSR
`
`CSS
`
`DMC
`
`ECG
`
`eCTD
`
`ETASU
`FDA
`
`FDAAA
`FDASIA
`GCP
`
`GRMP
`ICH
`
`IND
`
`ISE
`
`ISS
`
`ITT
`
`MedDRA
`mITT
`
`NCI-CTCAE
`NDA
`
`NME
`
`OCS
`
`
`advisory committee
`adverse event
`biologics license application
`Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act
`Benefit Risk Framework
`Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Center for Devices and Radiological Health
`Cross-Discipline Team Leader
`Code of Federal Regulations
`chemistry, manufacturing, and controls
`Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction Terms
`case report form
`contract research organization
`clinical review template
`clinical study report
`Controlled Substance Staff
`data monitoring committee
`electrocardiogram
`electronic common technical document
`elements to assure safe use
`Food and Drug Administration
`Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007
`Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act
`good clinical practice
`good review management practice
`International Conference on Harmonization
`Investigational New Drug
`integrated summary of effectiveness
`integrated summary of safety
`intent to treat
`Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities
`modified intent to treat
`National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event
`new drug application
`new molecular entity
`Office of Computational Science
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`7
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`
`OPQ
`
`OSE
`
`OSI
`PBRER
`PD
`
`PI
`
`PK
`
`PMC
`
`PMR
`
`PP
`
`PPI
`
`PREA
`
`PRO
`
`PSUR
`
`REMS
`SAE
`
`SAP
`
`SEALD
`SGE
`
`SOC
`
`TEAE
`
`
`
`Office of Pharmaceutical Quality
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology
`Office of Scientific Investigation
`Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
`pharmacodynamics
`prescribing information
`pharmacokinetics
`postmarketing commitment
`postmarketing requirement
`per protocol
`patient package insert
`Pediatric Research Equity Act
`patient reported outcome
`Periodic Safety Update report
`risk evaluation and mitigation strategy
`serious adverse event
`statistical analysis plan
`Study Endpoints and Labeling Development
`special government employee
`standard of care
`treatment emergent adverse event
`
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`8
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`1 Executive Summary
`
`
`
`Product Introduction
`
`Aripiprazole is an atypical antipsychotic that received U.S. approval on November 15, 2002
`(ABILIFY; NDA 021436). Aripiprazole is indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia, acute
`treatment of manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder, bipolar I disorder
`maintenance, adjunctive treatment of major depression, irritability associated with autistic
`disorder, and for the treatment of Tourette’s disorder. Approved aripiprazole oral dosages
`range from 2mg to 30mg per day. Currently approved aripiprazole formulations include oral
`tablets, orally disintegrating tablets, oral solution, short-acting intermuscular injection, and a
`long-acting intramuscular injection.
`
`The Applicant developed Abilify Mycite by embedding a sensor into aripiprazole tablets. The
`sensor powers on when exposed to stomach acid and transmits a signal to a wearable sensor
`(i.e., patch) placed over the upper left abdomen. The wearable sensor then transmits the data
`to a mobile application intended for patients and a web-portal intended for clinicians and
`caregivers. The Applicant developed Abilify Mycite
`
`
`
`
`
`Conclusions on the Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`9
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`The Applicant successfully demonstrated bioequivalence between approved oral aripiprazole tablets (the reference product) and
`oral aripiprazole tablets with embedded IEM in the original submission dated Jun 26, 2015. This application relies on FDA’s previous
`efficacy and safety findings for the reference drug, aripiprazole oral tablets (NDA 021436).
`
`The Applicant demonstrated substantial evidence of Abilify Mycite usability in one simulated use trial involving the intended
`population. When used in conjunction with the Medical Information Device #1 (MIND1) system, 90% of aripiprazole + IEM ingestions
`are detected within 30 minutes and 97% of aripiprazole + IEM ingestions are detected within two hours by the wearable sensor.
`Detection is accurately communicated to both the Mycite mobile application and the clinician/caregiver web-portal.
`
`. Rates of adherence to the MIND1
`system noted during the first review cycle were no different than rates of adherence noted in real-world adherence trials for daily
`oral antipsychotics.1 The simulated use trial performed for the re-submission provides no additional data regarding adherence or
`data regarding data transmission times. Considering these limitations, the most accurate statement regarding Abilify Mycite’s
`capabilities is that “Abilify Mycite successfully tracks ingestion of aripiprazole with embedded sensor.”
`
`
`
`Benefit-Risk Assessment
`
`Benefit-Risk Summary and Assessment
`Schizophrenia, Bipolar disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are serious and common mental disorders in the United States.
`Depressive disorders account for 40.5% of the disability caused by mental illness worldwide. In 2014, an estimated 15.7 million adults [6.7%
`of the adult population] in the United States had at least one major depressive episode in the past year. The estimated prevalence for
`schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in the U.S. population is roughly 1% and 3%, respectively.
`
`Poor patient adherence to pharmacological treatment is common in this patient population.1 All three disorders commonly require long-
`term or lifelong adherence to daily treatment to avoid relapse. Epidemiologic and clinical trials observe that relapse through non-adherence
`decreases rates of response to treatment, particularly response to previously effective drugs. While once widely accepted that parenterally
`administered depot antipsychotics improved treatment adherence, recent trials cast doubt upon this assertion. Newer trials suggest
`parentally administered depot antipsychotics merely delay non-adherence.2-4 However, depot antipsychotics maintain the advantage of
`predictable timeframes in which clinicians and caregivers know repeat dosing is required and intervene accordingly. Adherence to depot
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`10
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Daniel J. Lee, MD.
`NDA 207202
`
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`antipsychotics is also relatively easy to monitor, as clinicians know when they last administered the injection. Currently, seven FDA-
`
`approved, long-acting antipsychotic products exist. These include long-acting forms of haloperidol, fluphenazine, risperidone, paliperidone,
`
`aripiprazole, aripiprazole lauroxil, and olanzapine. Required frequency of long-acting parenteral antipsychotic administration ranges from
`
`weekly to quarterly.
`
`Abilify Mycite adds to the current treatment armamentarium for schizophrenia and mood disorders by allowing clinicians and caregivers
`
`another way to track aripiprazole ingestion, provided the right type of patient receives the product. Aripiprazole + MIND1 is not uniquely
`
`efficacious compared with other approved treatments and potential benefits decrease if prescribed to non-compliant, cognitively
`
`challenged, or oppositional patients.
`
`Mitigation of risks associated with delay in data transmission and wearable sensor-related adverse events are achieved through labeling.
`
`Mitigation of unanticipated risks associated with unstudied functions of the mobile application are achieved through the placement of a
`
`disclaimer statement in labeling and the mobile application. For regulatory purposes, the mobile application and web—portal are considered
`
`drug labeling. The required disclaimer will remind users and prescribing clinicians that drug ingestion is the only function of the mobile
`
`application that has been reviewed by the FDA. I recommend approval of the proposed product after obtaining agreement from the
`
`Applicant regarding the incorporation of a disclaimer statement into Limitations of Use (LOU). LOUs are required to appear in traditional
`
`labeling, the log—in screen for the mobile application, the log-in screen for the web—portal, and the summary screen of the web-portal.
`
`
`
`m Evidence and Uncertainties
`
`Conclusions and Reasons
`
`0 Schizophrenia, Bipolar disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder are
`
`0 Epidemiologic and clinical trials observe
`
`serious and common mental disorders in the United States.
`
`that relapse through non—adherence
`
`o Depressive disorders account for 40.5% of the disability caused by
`
`decreases rates of response to treatment,
`
`mental illness worldwide. In 2014, an estimated 15.7 million adults
`
`particularly response to previously
`
`in the United States had at least one major depressive episode in
`
`effective drugs.
`
`the past year.
`
`0 The need for polypharmacological
`
`o Sustained remission from symptoms for each of these disorders often
`
`treatment is likely reduced When patients
`
`requires polypharmacological treatment.
`
`are adherent to prescribed antipsychotics.
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`
`11
`
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`Reference ID: 41 73048
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Daniel J. Lee, MD.
`MBA 207202
`
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`m Evidence and Uncertainties
`
`Conclusions and Reasons
`
`0 Poor patient adherence to pharmacological treatment is common in
`this patient population.1
`
`Expanding interventions that potentially
`improve adherence to prescribed
`
`o All three disorders commonly require long-term or lifelong adherence
`
`antipsychotics is critically important to the
`
`to daily treatment to avoid relapse.
`
`public health.
`
`0 FDA-approved long-acting formulations of antipsychotic drugs include
`
`While once widely accepted that
`
`haloperidol, fluphenazine, risperidone, paliperidone, aripiprazole,
`
`parenterally administered depot
`
`aripiprazole lauroxil, and olanzapine.
`
`antipsychotics improved treatment
`
`0 Required frequency of long-acting parenteral antipsychotic
`
`adherence, recent trials cast doubt upon
`
`administration ranges from weekly to quarterly.
`
`0 Administration of a long-acting antipsychotic requires a trained
`clinician for administration and post-injection monitoring.
`. Adherence to depot antipsychotics is relatively easy to monitor, as
`clinicians know when they administered the injection.
`o FDA-approved oral formulations of antipsychotic drugs include
`chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, loxapine, perphenazine,
`perchloroperazine, thioridazine, thiothixene, trifluoperazine,
`
`aripiprazole, asenapine, clozapine, illoperidone, lurasidone,
`
`olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone.
`
`this assertion. Newer trials suggest
`
`parentally administered depot
`BHtipSYChOtiCS merely delay "0"-
`adherence.
`The advantage 0f using long-acting
`BHtiPSYChOthS is the predictable timeframe
`in WhiCh clinicians 30d caregivers know
`repeat closing is required.
`
`o Abilify Mycite provides a means of tracking oral aripiprazole ingestion.
`
`Potential for improved adherence to oral
`
`0 Long-term adherence to oral antipsychotic drugs is poor.
`
`aripiprazole is possible with Abilify Mycite
`
`0 Many patients struggling with adherence to antipsychotic drugs
`
`use.
`
`cannot receive or refuse to receive long-acting antipsychotic drugs.
`
`Adverse effects associated with oral
`
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`
`12
`
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`Reference ID: 41 73048
`
`Approval will likely spur future innovation
`
`aripiprazole are time-limited whereas
`
`adverse events associated with long-acting
`
`antipsychotics are prolonged.
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Daniel J. Lee, MD.
`MBA 207202
`
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`m Evidence and Uncertainties
`
`Conclusions and Reasons
`
`of similar drug tracking technology.
`
`Potential for improved communication
`
`between patients and clinicians regarding
`
`treatment is possible with Abilify Mycite.
`
`system is recommended.
`
`0 Individuals with active symptoms of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder,
`
`Usage errors increase the likelihood of
`
`and major depressive disorder are more likely to use Abilify Mycite
`
`incorrectly.
`
`patients experiencing wearable sensor-
`related adverse events and overdose.
`
`0 Minor, self-limited adverse events associated with the wearable
`
`Significant harm from usage errors is
`
`sensor were common in the three repeat-dose clinical trials,
`
`unlikely. Aripiprazole is relatively non-toxic
`
`accounting for 32%, 34%, and 64% of reported adverse events.
`
`0 Rare, severe dermatologic reactions requiring days to weeks to
`
`resolve occurred.
`
`in overdose and patients will presumably
`remove the wearable sensor if an adverse
`
`event occurs.
`
`0 Infections accounted for a higher than predicted 9%, 11%, and 18% of
`
`Rates of infection in repeat-dose trials are
`
`reported adverse events in the three repeat-dose trials. Infection
`
`explainable by high rates of concomitant
`
`rates are not reported in initial placebo-controlled published
`
`antipsychotic use. It is likely that Abilify
`
`aripiprazole tablet clinical trials; rates are assumed to be <2%. Raw
`
`Mycite is not associated with a higher rate
`
`data from these initial trials is contained in unavailable paper records.
`
`of infection than is present with
`
`0 The longest Abilify Mycite trial was 16 weeks in length.
`
`An open-label, longitudinal post-marketing
`
`aripiprazole.
`
`0 The generalizability of the applicant’s two-day simulated use trial to
`
`real-world Abilify Mycite use over time is unknown.
`
`0 While the overwhelming majority of tablets are detected within an
`
`hour or less post—ingestion, a delay of up to four hours in transmission
`
`of data from aripiprazole + IEM tablet to the Mycite mobile
`
`application and clinician/caregiver web-portal occurred in outlying
`cases.
`
`trial evaluating rates of correct MIND1 use,
`rates of wearable sensor-related adverse
`
`events, rates of MIND1-related overdose,
`
`rates of MIND1 adherence, and rates of
`
`infection in individuals using the MIND1
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`
`13
`
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`Reference ID: 41 73048
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Daniel J. Lee, MD.
`NDA 207202
`
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`m Evidence and Uncertainties
`
`Conclusions and Reasons
`
`0 Correct Abilify Mycite use in the simulated use trial was 66%.
`
`The Division recommended specific criteria
`
`0 Combining individuals who correctly used the product with individuals
`
`for wearable sensor discontinuationIn
`
`that failed in ways that did not undermine aripiprazole tablet
`
`labeling.
`
`resolve occurred.
`
`ingestion, 86% of enrolled participants derived benefit from ingesting
`
`Specific language cautioning against ”real-
`
`aripiprazole as prescribed.
`
`time” use of Abilify Mycite'IS incorporated
`
`0 Minor, self-limited wearable sensor-related adverse events occurred
`
`into labeling.
`
`frequently in Abilify Mycite clinical trials.
`
`0 Rare, severe dermatologic reactions requiring days to weeks to
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`
`14
`
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`Reference ID: 41 73048
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`
`2 Therapeutic Context
`
`
`
`Analysis of Condition
`
`Please see Section 1.3 Risk Benefit Assessment for condition details pertaining to this
`application.
`
`
`
`Analysis of Current Treatment Options
`
`Please see Section 1.3 Risk Benefit Assessment for current treatment details pertaining to this
`application.
`
`Table 1: Summary of FDA-Approved Long-Acting Antipsychotics
`
`Product (s) Name
`
`Relevant Indication
`
`Dosing/
`Administration
`
`haloperidol decanoate
`
`Schizophrenia
`
`50mg or 100mg injection monthly
`
`fluphenazine decanoate
`
`Schizophrenia
`
`12.5mg to 100mg injection monthly
`
`risperidone
`
`paliperidone palmitate
`(1-month formulation)
`paliperidone palmitate
`(3-month formulation)
`aripiprazole
`
`aripiprazole lauroxil
`
`Schizophrenia and Bipolar I
`Disorder
`Schizophrenia and
`Schizoaffective Disorder
`Schizophrenia
`
`Schizophrenia and Bipolar I
`Disorder
`Schizophrenia
`
`
`
`
`
`olanzapine pamoate
`
`Schizophrenia
`
`12.5mg, 25mg, 37.5mg, or 50mg
`injection every two weeks
`39mg, 78mg, 117mg, 156mg, or 234mg
`injection monthly
`273mg, 410mg, 546mg, or 819mg
`injection quarterly
`300mg or 400mg injection monthly
`
`441mg, 662mg, or 882mg injection
`monthly; 882mg injection every six
`weeks; 1064mg injection every two
`months
`150mg-300mg injection every two
`weeks; 405mg injection monthly
`
`Source: Reviewer Constructed
`
`3 Regulatory Background
`
` U.S. Regulatory Actions and Marketing History
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`15
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`Approved aripiprazole formulations include oral tablets, oral solution, oral disintegrating
`tablets, intramuscular injectable, and multiple formulations of extended-release injectable.
`
`Aripiprazole Indications by Year Granted
`
`
`
`Schizophrenia
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Acute bipolar disorder
`
`
`
`
`
`Bipolar disorder maintenance
`
`
`
`
`Adjunctive treatment of bipolar disorder
`
`Adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder
`
`Irritability in children with autism
`
`
`
`Agitation associated with bipolar I mania and schizophrenia
`
`2002
`2004
`2004
`2004
`2007
`2009
`2009
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Summary of Pre-Submission/Submission Regulatory Activity
`
`During the original review cycle, reviewers identified several quality deficiencies. The Division
`issued a Complete Response letter, dated April 26, 2016. In Trial #316-13-206b, reviewers
`noted data for placebo only, significant non-detection of dosing 30 minutes following ingestion,
`
` Reviewers observed wide variability in time to data transmission from the wearable
`sensor to the Cloud server and mobile application. As no transmission times involved the fed
`state, reviewers did not know if food influenced variability for transmission times. Together,
`these concerns formed the basis for the Complete Response action.
`
`In the Complete Response letter, FDA required the Applicant undertake a trial designed
`similarly to Trial #316-13-206b “unambiguously testing the to-be-marketed formulation under
`real world conditions.” FDA also asked that the Applicant incorporate safeguards
`. The Complete Response
` from the mobile application as an alternative
`
`letter offered removal of the
`way to satisfy this requirement.
`
`
`
`Following the Complete Response letter, the Applicant submitted a human factors protocol for
`FDA review on September 19, 2016. The FDA completed an a priori review of the protocol on
`December 23, 2016. After receiving feedback on the protocol, the Applicant conducted a 35
`participant, two-day simulated use trial (DC-001576) at three U.S. sites from February 21, 2017,
`to March 3, 2017. The Applicant also removed the
` from the mobile
`application.
`
`
`
`Foreign Regulatory Actions and Marketing History
`
`Not applicable.
`
`
`CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition
`Version date: April 9, 2015 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews)
`
`16
`
`Reference ID: 4173048
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Daniel J. Lee, M.D.
`NDA 207202
`aripiprazole + MIND1 system (Abilify Mycite)
`
`
`4 Significant Issues from Other Review Disciplines Pertinent to Clinical
`Conclusions on Efficacy and Safety
`
`
`
`Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI)
`
`FDA conducted no inspections in response to re-submission of this application.
`
`
`
`Product Quality
`
`From the perspective of product quality, the Applicant adequately responded to all deficiencies
`laid out in the Complete Response letter.
`
`
`
`Clinical Microbiology
`
`Not applicable.
`
`
`
`
`Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology
`
`Not applicable.
`
`
`
`
`Clinical Pharmacology
`
`Not applicable.
`
` Mechanism of Action
`
`Aripiprazole is a dihydroquinolinone antipsychotic with no psychoactive metabolites.
`Pharmacologically, aripiprazole exhibits partial affinity at D2 and 5HT1A, antagonism activity at
`5HT2A, and affinity at D3, D4, 5HT2C, 5HT7, α-1, and H1.
`
` Pharmacodynamics
`
`The Applicant successfully demonstrated bioequivalence between approved oral aripiprazole
`tablets (the reference product) and oral aripiprazole tablets with embedded IEM in the original
`submission dated Jun 26, 2015.
`
` Pharmacokinetics
`
`The Applicant successfully demonstrated bioequivalence between approved oral aripiprazole
`tablets (the reference product) and oral aripiprazole tablets with embedded IEM in the original
`submission dated Jun 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket