throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`207154Orig1s000
`
`PROPRIETARY NAME REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PROPRIETARY NAME REVIEW
`Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA)
`Office of Medication Error Prevention and Risk Management (OMEPRM)
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE)
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
`
`*** This document contains proprietary information that cannot be released to the public***
`
`Date of This Review:
`July 8, 2015
`Application Type and Number: NDA 207154
`Product Name and Strength:
`Aczone (Dapsone) Gel, 7.5%
`Product Type:
`Single ingredient product
`Rx or OTC:
`Rx
`Applicant/Sponsor Name:
`Allergan Inc.
`Submission Date:
`April 28, 2015
`Panorama #:
`2015-411667
`DMEPA Primary Reviewer:
`Carlos M Mena-Grillasca, RPh
`DMEPA Team Leader:
`Kendra Worthy, PharmD
`DMEPA Associate Director:
`Lubna Merchant, MS, PharmD
`
`Reference ID: 3789326
`
`

`

`Contents
`INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1
`1.1
`Regulatory History................................................................................................ 1
`1.2
`Product Information............................................................................................. 1
`RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 2
`2.1
`Promotional Assessment...................................................................................... 2
`2.2
`Safety Assessment................................................................................................ 2
`CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................................. 3
`3.1
`Comments to the Applicant ................................................................................. 4
`REFERENCES................................................................................................................. 5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Reference ID: 3789326
`
`

`

`INTRODUCTION
`1
`This review evaluates the proposed proprietary name, Aczone, from a safety and
`promotional perspective. The sources and methods used to evaluate the proposed
`name are outlined in the reference section and Appendix A respectively. The Applicant
`did not submit an external name study.
`
`REGULATORY HISTORY
`1.1
`Aczone (Dapsone) Gel, 5% (NDA 021794) was approved on July 7, 2005. The proposed
`proprietary name, Aczone, was found conditionally acceptable in the IND for the 7.5%
`gel formulation1.
`The applicant submitted the name, Aczone, for review during the NDA on April 28, 2015.
`
`PRODUCT INFORMATION
`1.2
`The following product information is provided in the April 18, 2014 proprietary name
`submission.
`Intended Pronunciation: ak-zōn
`
` Active Ingredient: dapsone
`Indication of Use: Topical treatment of acne vulgaris
`
` Route of Administration: Topical
` Dosage Form: Gel
` Proposed Strength: 7.5%
`Currently Marketed: 5%
` Proposed Dose and Frequency (7.5% strength): Apply approximately a pea-sized
`amount of ACZONE Gel, 7.5%, in a thin layer to the acne affected areas once daily.
`Current Dose and Frequency (5% strength): Apply approximately a pea-sized
`amount of ACZONE Gel, 5%, in a thin layer to the acne affected areas twice daily.
` How Supplied:
`Currently: 3 g laminate tube sample; 30 g, 60 g, 90 g laminate tube
`Proposed: 3 g laminate tube sample; 30 g, 60 g, 90 g airless pumps
`Storage: 20 - 25° C (68 - 76° F), excursions permitted to 15 - 30° C (59 - 86° F)
`
` Container and Closure Systems: n/a
`
`
`1 Mena-Grillasca, C. Proprietary Review for Aczone (IND 054440). Silver Spring (MD): FDA, CDER,
`OSE, DMEPA (US); Insert Date As 2014AUG08. RCM No.: 2014-17244.
`
`Reference ID: 3789326
`
`1
`
`

`

`RESULTS
`2
`The following sections provide information obtained and considered in the overall
`evaluation of the proposed proprietary name.
`
`2.1 PROMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT
`The Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) determined the proposed name is
`acceptable from a promotional perspective. DMEPA and the Division of Dermatology
`and Dental Products (DDDP) concurred with the findings of OPDP’s promotional
`assessment of the proposed name.
`
`2.2 SAFETY ASSESSMENT
`The following aspects were considered in the safety evaluation of the name.
`
`2.2.1 United States Adopted Names (USAN) Search
`There is no USAN stem present in the proprietary name1.
`
`2.2.2 Components of the Proposed Proprietary Name
`The applicant indicated in their submission that the proposed name, Aczone, is derived
`from the existing product, Aczone (dapsone) Gel, 5%. This proprietary name is
`comprised of a single word that contains the letters ‘ac’, which are used as a
`pharmaceutical abbreviation for oral products that are meant to be taken “before
`meals”. However, since this is a topical product the letters ‘ac’ in the name are not
`misleading and cannot contribute to medication errors. Additionally, as noted above we
`did not retrieve any medication errors associated with name confusion with the name
`Aczone.
`The Applicant is proposing a new 7.5% strength for their product line. The proposed
`7.5% and the currently marketed 5% strengths share the same indication and dose;
`however, the frequency of administration differs (5% is applied twice daily vs. 7.5% is
`applied once daily). It is a common and accepted practice to have a product line with
`multiple formulations/dosage forms and strengths managed under one proprietary
`name. Therefore, given the precedent for using this naming convention, Aczone is an
`acceptable proprietary name for the 7.5% strength.
`
`
`1USAN stem search conducted on June 25, 2015.
`
`Reference ID: 3789326
`
`2
`
`

`

`2.2.3 Comments from Other Review Disciplines at Initial Review
`
`In response to the OSE, May 26, 2015 e-mail, the Division of Dermatology and Dental
`
`Products (DDDP) did not fonNard any comments or concerns relating to the proposed
`
`proprietary name at the initial phase of the review.
`
`2.2.4 Medication Error Data Selection of Cases
`
`We searched the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database using the
`
`strategy listed in Table 1 (see Appendix A for a description of FAERS database).
`
`Table 1: FAERS Search Strategy
`
`June 25. 2015
`
`Aczone [product name]
`
`MedDRA Search Strategy
`
`Product name confusion (PT)
`
`
`
`Medication error (PT)
`
`Intercepted medication error (PT)
`
`Drug dispensing error (PT)
`
`Intercepted drug dispensing error (PT)
`
`Circumstance or information capable of leading to a
`
`medication error (PT)
`
`July 1, 2014 to June 1, 2015.
`
`Time/Date Limits
`
`Last FAERS search performed for OSE review 2014-
`
`17244, dated August 21, 2014, was on July 1, 2014.
`
`The FAERS database search did not retrieve any cases.
`
`2.2.5 Communication of DMEPA’s Analysis at Midpoint of Review
`
`DMEPA communicated our findings to the Division of Dermatology and Dental Products
`
`(DDDP) via e-mail on July 7, 2015. At that time we also requested additional
`
`information or concerns that could inform our review. Per e-mail correspondence from
`
`the DDDP on July 7, 2015, they stated no additional concerns with the proposed
`
`proprietary name Aczone.
`
`3
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`The proposed proprietary name is acceptable from both a promotional and safety
`
`perspective.
`
`If you have further questions or need clarifications, please contact Janet Anderson, OSE
`
`project manager, at 301-796-0675.
`
`Reference ID: 3789326
`
`

`

`COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT
`3.1
`We have completed our review of the proposed proprietary name, Aczone, and have
`concluded that this name is acceptable.
`If any of the proposed product characteristics as stated in your April 28, 2015
`submission are altered prior to approval of the marketing application, the name must be
`resubmitted for review.
`
`Reference ID: 3789326
`
`4
`
`

`

`4
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. USAN Stems (http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-
`science/united-states-adopted-names-council/naming-guidelines/approved-
`stems.page)
`USAN Stems List contains all the recognized USAN stems.
`
`2. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
`
`The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is a database that contains
`information on adverse event and medication error reports submitted to FDA. The
`database is designed to support the FDA's postmarket safety surveillance program
`for drug and therapeutic biologic products. The informatic structure of the FAERS
`database adheres to the international safety reporting guidance issued by the
`International Conference on Harmonisation. FDA’s Office of Surveillance and
`Epidemiology codes adverse events and medication errors to terms in the Medical
`Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology. Product names are
`coded using the FAERS Product Dictionary. More information about FAERS can be
`found at:
`http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Surveillance
`/AdverseDrugEffects/default.htm.
`
`APPENDICES
`Appendix A
`FDA’s Proprietary Name Risk Assessment considers the promotional and safety aspects of a
`proposed proprietary name.
`1. Promotional Assessment: For prescription drug products, the promotional review of the
`proposed name is conducted by OPDP. For over-the-counter (OTC) drug products, the
`promotional review of the proposed name is conducted by DNCE. OPDP or DNCE
`evaluates proposed proprietary names to determine if they are overly fanciful, so as to
`misleadingly imply unique effectiveness or composition, as well as to assess whether
`they contribute to overstatement of product efficacy, minimization of risk, broadening
`of product indications, or making of unsubstantiated superiority claims. OPDP or DNCE
`provides their opinion to DMEPA for consideration in the overall acceptability of the
`proposed proprietary name.
`2. Safety Assessment: The safety assessment is conducted by DMEPA, and includes the
`following:
`a. Preliminary Assessment: We consider inclusion of USAN stems or other characteristics
`that when incorporated into a proprietary name may cause or contribute to medication
`errors (i.e., dosing interval, dosage form/route of administration, medical or product
`name abbreviations, names that include or suggest the composition of the drug
`product, etc.) See prescreening checklist below in Table 2*. DMEPA defines a
`medication error as any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate
`
`Reference ID: 3789326
`
`5
`
`

`

`medication use or patient harm while the medication is in the control of the health care
`professional, patient, or consumer. I
`
`*Table 2- Prescreening Checklist for Proposed Proprietary Name
`
`Affirmative answers to these questions indicate a potential area of
`concern.
`
`iz
`
`Does the name have obvious Similarities in Spelling and Pronunciation to other
`Names?
`
`iH
`iz
`
`iz
`iH
`
`
`
`Are there Medical and/or Coined Abbreviations in the Proprietary Name?
`
`Is this the same Proprietary Name for Products containing Different Active
`
`Ingredients?
`
`Is this a Proprietary Name of a discontinued product?
`
`b. Comments from Other Review Disciplines: DMEPA requests the Office of New Drugs (OND)
`
`and/or Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), ONDQA or OBP for their comments or concerns with
`the proposed proprietary name, ask for any clinical issues that may impact the DMEPA
`
`review during the initial phase of the name review. Additionally, when applicable, at the
`
`same time DMEPA requests concurrence/non-concurrence with OPDP's decision on the
`name. The primary Safety Evaluator addresses any comments or concerns in the safety
`evaluator’5 assessment.
`
`The OND/OGD Regulatory Division is contacted a second time following our analysis of the
`proposed proprietary name. At this point, DM EPA conveys their decision to accept or reject
`
`the name. The OND or 060 Regulatory Division is requested to provide any further
`
`information that might inform DMEPA’s final decision on the proposed name.
`
`Additionally, other review disciplines opinions such as ONDQA or OBP may be considered
`
`depending on the proposed proprietary name.
`
`When provided, DMEPA considers external proprietary name studies conducted by or for the
`Applicant/Sponsor and incorporates the findings of these studies into the overall risk
`assessment.
`
`The DMEPA primary reviewer assigned to evaluate the proposed proprietary name is
`
`responsible for considering the collective findings, and provides an overall risk assessment of the
`
`proposed proprietary name.
`
`1 National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention.
`httQ:z[www.nccmerp.org[aboutMedErrors.html. Last accessed 10/11/2007.
`
`Reference ID: 3789326
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`CARLOS M MENA-GRILLASCA
`07/08/2015
`
`KENDRA C WORTHY
`07/10/2015
`
`LUBNA A MERCHANT
`07/10/2015
`
`Reference ID: 3789326
`
`(
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket