throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`206439Orig1s000
`
`STATISTICAL REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`STATISTICAL REVIEW AND EVALUATION
`
`Biometrics Division: VI
`
`206439
`October 17, 2014
`
`NDA NO.:
`DATE RECEIVED BY ONDQA:
`DRUG NAME:
`Namzaric
`GENERIC NAME
`Memantine HCl ER/Donepezil Capsules
`Tablet
`DOSAGE FORM:
`14 mg 10 mg, 28 mg / 10 mg
`STRENGTH
`Treatment of moderate to severe dementia of the
`INDICATION:
`Alzheimer’s type.
`SPONSOR:
`Forest Laboratories, Inc.
`October 27, 2014
`REVIEW FINISHED:
`NAME OF STATISTICAL REVIEWER: Xiaoyu (Cassie) Dong, Ph.D.
`
` ____________________________________
`
`
` Reviewer: Xiaoyu Dong, Mathematical Statistician, CDER/OTS/OB/DB VI
`
`
`Concur: ______________________
`
` Meiyu Shen, TL, Mathematical Statistician, CDER/OTS/OB/DB VI
`
`
`
`NDA 206439
`Distribution:
`CDER/OTS/OB/DB VI/ Yi Tsong
`CDER/OTS/OB/DB VI/ Meiyu Shen
`CDER/OTS/OB/ Lillian Patrician
`CDER/ONDQA/Pei-I Chu
`CDER/ONDQA/ Okpo Eradiri
`CDER/ONDQA/ Teshara G, BOUIE
`
`Reference ID: 3648813
`
`

`

`NDA 206439: Stability Analysis of Dissolution Data
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 4
`II.
`INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 4
`III.
`FDA STAT REVIEWER’S ANALYSES ................................................................................... 5
`
`Reference ID: 3648813
`
`2
`
`

`

`NDA 206439: Stability Analysis of Dissolution Data
`
`List of Figures
`
`Figure 1 : Stability Plots of Average 1-Hour Dissolution at 14 mg/ 10 mg Strength from FDA
`Statistical Reviewer’s Analysis (the dash lines are the 95% one-sided confidence interval of
`the mean response, the solid line is the mean response from regression analysis; the red
`straight line is the FDA’s proposed specification of
`%)..................................................... 6
`Figure 2 : Stability Plots of Average 1-Hour Dissolution at 28 mg/ 10 mg Strength from FDA
`Statistical Reviewer’s Analysis (the dash lines are the 95% one-sided confidence interval of
`the mean response, the solid line is the mean response from regression analysis; the red
`straight line is the FDA’s proposed specification of
`%)..................................................... 8
`Figure 3 : Stability Plots of Average 4-Hour Dissolution at 14 mg/ 10 mg Strength from FDA
`Statistical Reviewer’s Analysis (the dash curves are the 95% two-sided confidence interval of
`the mean response, the solid line is the mean response from regression analysis; the red
`straight lines are the FDA’s proposed specification of
`%........................................... 9
`Figure 4 : Stability Plots of Average 4-Hour Dissolution at 28 mg/ 10 mg Strength from FDA
`Statistical Reviewer’s Analysis (the dash curves are the 95% two-sided confidence interval of
`the mean response, the solid line is the mean response from regression analysis; the red
`%......................................... 12
`straight lines are the FDA’s proposed specification of
`Figure 5 : Stability Plots of Average 8-Hour Dissolution at 14 mg/ 10 mg Strength from FDA
`Statistical Reviewer’s Analysis (the dash curves are the 95% two-sided confidence interval of
`the mean response, the solid line is the mean response from regression analysis; the red
`straight lines are the FDA’s proposed specification of
`%......................................... 15
`Figure 6 : Stability Plots of Average 8-Hour Dissolution at 28 mg/ 10 mg Strength from FDA
`Statistical Reviewer’s Analysis (the dash curves are the 95% two-sided confidence interval of
`the mean response, the solid line is the mean response from regression analysis; the red
`straight lines are the FDA’s proposed specification of
`%......................................... 18
`Figure 7 : Stability Plots of Average 12-Hour Dissolution at 14 mg/ 10 mg Strength from FDA
`Statistical Reviewer’s Analysis (the dash curves are the 95% one-sided confidence interval of
`the mean response, the solid line is the mean response from regression analysis; the red
`straight line is the FDA’s proposed specification of NLT %............................................... 21
`Figure 8 : Stability Plots of Average 12-Hour Dissolution at 28 mg/ 10 mg Strength from FDA
`Statistical Reviewer’s Analysis (the dash curves are the 95% one-sided confidence interval of
`the mean response, the solid line is the mean response from regression analysis; the red
`straight line is the FDA’s proposed specification of NLT %............................................... 22
`
`Reference ID: 3648813
`
`3
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 206439: Stability Analysis of Dissolution Data
`
`I.
`
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`
`We performed statistical analysis of 12 months long-term dissolution stability data at 1h, 4h, 8h,
`and 12h for Memantine HCl ER
`manufactured by Forest Research for the strength of 14 mg
`/ 10 mg and 28 mg/10 mg.
`
`The results are summarized in Table 1.As it shows, the shelf life for each strength is not able to be
`established because most of the observations at 4h and 8h are out of the specification proposed by
`FDA. More specifically, the dissolution results at 4h and 8h are in general too high compared to
`the upper limit of the acceptance criteria. Revision and finalization of the specifications may be
`needed for this combined drug product.
`
`Please see section III for detailed stability analysis results.
`
`Table 1 - FDA Statistics Reviewer’s Estimated Shelf Life for each Strength using Long-term
`Dissolution Stability Data and FDA’s Proposed Specification
`8h
`Strength
`1h
`4h
`Most observations are out of the
`14 mg / 10 mg
`18 months
`upper limit of the proposed
`28 mg/10 mg
`18 months
`acceptance criteria
`
`12h
`18 months
`18 months
`
`II.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The sponsor submitted the long-term stability data of dissolution testing up to 12 months for the
`following batches as listed in Table 2. The product of each batch was packaged in bottle
`configurations of 30 counts and 90 counts as shown in Table 3.
`
`Table 2: Available Long-Term Stability Data
`
`Reference ID: 3648813
`
`4
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 206439: Stability Analysis of Dissolution Data
`
`Table 3—1.ND-\ Reg'ntration Batches - Container Closure Svsmn
`
`Table 3: Package Configurations
`
`Capsule
`Count
`
`Strength
`(mg)
`
`GOCOHDPE’BOTIIEWWI-11TH]
`(I!) (4)
`
`(It)(4)
`
`SSMM("IUWHITE'CAP
`
`Ww
`
`(I!) (4)
`
`SI'IEOCCIHDPE‘BO‘I'IIE’WTIITE
`
`I
`(”"0 ”M‘mmmfimp
`
`‘
`
`(m4)
`
`w...
`
`(mo were obtained at 1h, 4h, 8h, and 12h for
`The dissolution testing results for Memantine ER
`each batch and each configuration at the long-term storage condition. The FDA’s proposed
`
`specifications are listed below in Table 4.
`
`Table 4 - FDA Proposed Acceptance Criteria for Dissolution Testing at Each Time Point
`In
`4h
`8h
`121:
`"’"" %
`W" %
`"’"° %
`NLT 23%
`
`Acce tance Criteria
`
`III.
`
`FDA STAT REVIEWER’S ANALYSES
`
`We performed statistical analysis of 12 months long-term dissolution stability data at 1h, 4b, 8b,
`and 12h for Memantine HCl ER (5x4) manufactured by Forest Research for the strength of 14 mg
`/ 10 mg and 28 mg/ 10 mg. The results are summarized as below.
`
`0 For 1hr average dissolution data, the estimated shelf life using 12-months long term data is
`18 months with an acceptance criterion of NMT 8%;
`
`o For 4hr average dissolution data, the estimated shelf life using 12-months long term data
`cannot be obtained with acceptance criteria of
`(”(0% because most of the data points
`
`are out of upper limit of the specification. In addition, the data of three batches at each
`
`strength cannot be pooled due to significant batch effect.
`
`0 For 8hr average dissolution data, the estimated shelf life using lZ-months long term data
`cannot be obtained with acceptance criteria of
`o)(o%_ %, because most of the data
`points are out of upper limit of the specification. In addition, the data of three batches at
`
`each strength cannot be pooled due to significant batch effect.
`
`Reference ID: 3648813
`
`

`

`NDA 206439: Stability Analysis of Dissolution Data
`
`0 For 12 hr average dissolution data, the estimated shelf life using 12-months long term data
`is 18 months with an acceptance criterion of NLT¢)(4)%;
`
`The stability plots of 1h, 4h, 8h, and 12h dissolution data from three batches listed in Table 2 are
`
`provided below. In those plots, red straight lines are the FDA proposed acceptance criteria; the
`dashed cmves are the 95% confident limits. The estimated shelf life would be the shortest intersect
`
`of the dashed line (95% confidence limits) with the limits of the acceptance criteria.
`
`Figure 1 : Stability Plots of Average l-Hour Dissolution at 14 mg] 10 mg Strength from FDA Statistical
`
`Reviewer’s Analysis (the dash lines are the 95% one-sided confidence interval of the mean response, the
`
`solid line is the mean response from regression analysis;
`specification of (”(0%)
`
`the red straight line is the FDA’s proposed
`
` .
`
`(5X4)
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`: Stability Analysns of Dissolution at 1 hour (%) at long term
`conditions
`
`STREN GTII=1 4mg/10mg COENT=1200€ 9060unt
`
`(mo
`
`Mcmantmc ER
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`oO
`
`
`
`0
`
`3
`
`6
`
`9
`
`12
`
`15
`
`18
`
`21
`
`24
`
`Time in Mouth
`
`
`
`BATCH - - - - BN00023907 - - - ‘ BN00023908 - - - - BNOOOZ3909
`
`l6 Page(s) has been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`Reference ID: 364881 3
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`XIAOYU DONG
`10/27/2014
`
`MEIYU SHEN
`10/27/2014
`
`Reference ID: 3648813
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket