throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`206321Orig1s000
`
`PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY NDA/BLA REVIEW AND EVALUATION
`
`Application number:
`Supporting document/s:
`
`Applicant’s letter date:
`CDER stamp date:
`Product:
`
`Indication:
`
`206321
`1 / 12.20.13 / new NDA
`29 / 07.15.14 / Response to Information Request
`20 December 2013
`20 December 2013
`Saxenda™ (liraglutide injection for weight
`management)
`An adjunct to a reduced calorie diet and increased
`physical activity for chronic weight management in
`overweight adults with at least 1 weight-related co-
`morbidity or obese adults
`
`Applicant:
`Review Division:
`Reviewer:
`Supervisor/Team Leader:
`Division Director:
`Project Manager:
`
`Novo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, NJ 08536
`Endocrinology and Metabolism Products
`Anthony Parola, PhD
`Karen Davis-Bruno, PhD
`Jean-Marc Guettier, MD
`Patricia Madara
`
`Disclaimer
`
`Except as specifically identified, all data and information discussed below and necessary for
`approval of 206321 are owned by Novo Nordisk or are data for which Novo Nordisk has
`obtained a written right of reference.
`Any information or data necessary for approval of 206321 that Novo Nordisk does not own or
`have a written right to reference constitutes one of the following: (1) published literature, or (2) a
`prior FDA finding of safety or effectiveness for a listed drug, as reflected in the drug’s approved
`labeling. Any data or information described or referenced below from reviews or publicly
`available summaries of a previously approved application is for descriptive purposes only and is
`not relied upon for approval of 206321.
`
`Reference ID: 3627306
`
`1 of 162
`
`

`

`NDA 206321
`
`Anthony Parola, PhD
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................... 4
`1.1
`INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 4
`1.2
`BRIEF DISCUSSION OF NONCLINICAL FINDINGS .............................................................. 4
`1.3
`RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................................................... 6
`DRUG INFORMATION......................................................................................................10
`2.1
`DRUG .........................................................................................................................10
`2.2
`RELEVANT INDS, NDAS, BLAS AND DMFS...................................................................11
`2.3
`DRUG FORMULATION...................................................................................................11
`2.4
`COMMENTS ON NOVEL EXCIPIENTS ..............................................................................13
`2.5
`COMMENTS ON IMPURITIES/DEGRADANTS OF CONCERN ................................................13
`2.6
`PROPOSED CLINICAL POPULATION AND DOSING REGIMEN.............................................17
`2.7
`REGULATORY BACKGROUND........................................................................................17
`STUDIES SUBMITTED.....................................................................................................20
`3.1
`STUDIES REVIEWED ....................................................................................................20
`3.2
`STUDIES NOT REVIEWED .............................................................................................22
`3.3
`PREVIOUS REVIEWS REFERENCED ...............................................................................22
`PHARMACOLOGY...........................................................................................................23
`4.1
`PRIMARY PHARMACOLOGY...........................................................................................28
`4.2
`SECONDARY PHARMACOLOGY .....................................................................................75
`4.3
`SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY ............................................................................................75
`PHARMACOKINETICS/ADME/TOXICOKINETICS ..........................................................75
`5.1
`PK/ADME ..................................................................................................................79
`5.2
`TOXICOKINETICS .........................................................................................................81
`GENERAL TOXICOLOGY................................................................................................83
`
`GENETIC TOXICOLOGY..................................................................................................88
`7.3
`IN VIVO CLASTOGENICITY ASSAY IN RODENT (MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY)...........................88
`CARCINOGENICITY.......................................................................................................102
`
`REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY ..........................................105
`
`SPECIAL TOXICOLOGY STUDIES............................................................................119
`10
`LOCAL TOXICITY........................................................................................................127
`10.1
`10.2 MECHANISTIC TOXICITY STUDIES, THYROID SAFETY....................................................133
`10.3 PANCREAS SAFETY ...................................................................................................141
`11
`INTEGRATED SUMMARY AND SAFETY EVALUATION ..........................................146
`
`APPENDIX/ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................157
`12
`APPENDIX 1: ASSESSMENT OF
` AND
` GENETIC TOXICITY FROM
`NOVO NORDISK ....................................................................................................................157
`
`Reference ID: 3627306
`
`2 of 162
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 206321
`
`Anthony Parola, PhD
`
`APPENDIX 2: ASSESSMENT OF
` GENETIC TOXICITY FROM
` AND
`THE CHEMICAL INFORMATICS GROUP AT FDA’S CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`............................................................................................................................................159
`APPENDIX 3: CONSULT FROM CDER’S PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY COORDINATING COMMITTEE
`GENETIC TOXICOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE REGARDING THE VALIDITY AND OUTCOME OF IN VIVO
` IN MICE. ..........................161
`MICRONUCLEUS ASSAYS OF
` AND
`
`Reference ID: 3627306
`
`3 of 162
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`

`

`NDA 206321
`
`Anthony Parola, PhD
`
`1
`
`Executive Summary
`
`1.1
`
`Introduction
`Liraglutide, a lipidated glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog, is a GLP-1 receptor
`(GLP-1R) agonist from Novo Nordisk approved in January 2010 as an adjunct to diet and
`exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) under New
`Drug Application (NDA) 22341 for Victoza. NDA 206321 from Novo Nordisk seeks marketing
`approval of Saxenda, 3.0 mg/day liraglutide as an adjunct to a reduced calorie diet and
`increased physical activity for chronic weight management in overweight adults (initial body
`mass index (BMI) > kg/m2) with at least 1 weight-related comorbidity (hypertension, prediabetes
`or T2DM, dyslipidemia, or obstructive sleep apnea) or obese adults (initial BMI >30 kg/m2).
`Saxenda and Victoza both consist of 3 mL of 6 mg/mL liraglutide solution for subcutaneous
`injection in a laminated rubber disc capped glass cartridge contained in a pen injector, and the
`only difference between the 2 products is the pen injector. The Victoza FlexPen is capable of
`delivering up to 1.8 mg liraglutide (0.3 mL) in a single injection, the maximum recommended
`human dose (MRHD) for the treatment of T2DM, while the Saxenda PDS290 pen injector is
`capable of delivering up to 3 mg/day liraglutide (0.5 mL dose volume) in a single injection, the
`only proposed maintenance dose and the MRHD for weight management.
`
`1.2
`
`Brief Discussion of Nonclinical Findings
`Pivotal nonclinical studies evaluating the safety of liraglutide were previously reviewed
`under Victoza NDA 22341 and cross-referenced by Saxenda NDA 206321. Because systemic
`clearance of subcutaneously injected liraglutide increases with body weight in humans, steady
`state systemic exposure from 3.0 mg/day liraglutide in obese adults (AUC0-24h 854 nM*h) was
`only slightly higher than steady state systemic exposure in healthy adults administered 1.8
`mg/day liraglutide (AUC0-24h 809 nM*h), based on plasma liraglutide AUC comparison.
`Therefore, human exposure multiples based on systemic exposure for findings in nonclinical
`safety studies of liraglutide, including carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental
`toxicity studies, are similar for 3.0 mg/day liraglutide in obese adults and 1.8 mg/day liraglutide
`in healthy adults.
`Liraglutide (NN2211 or NNC 90-1170) is a lipidated human GLP-1 analog with prolonged
`pharmacologic activity after subcutaneous bolus injection. Biologic effects of liraglutide are
`mediated by the GLP-1R, a G-protein coupled receptor coupled to the stimulatory G-protein, Gs.
`In vitro, liraglutide is a selective GLP-1R agonist pharmacologically active at cloned GLP-1Rs
`from mice, rats, rabbits, pigs, monkeys, and humans. In vivo, liraglutide is active in animal
`models of type 2 diabetes and obesity. While the effects of liraglutide to improve glycemic
`control are mainly due to blood glucose-dependent enhanced insulin secretion, the effects of
`liraglutide to reduce food consumption and body weight gain are centrally mediated. Studies
`evaluating CNS penetration of peripherally administered liraglutide showed liraglutide accesses
`and activates neurons in brain regions regulating food intake in rats.
`Liraglutide was formulated as a solution for subcutaneous injection. Peak and total
`liraglutide exposure generally increased linearly with dose with no appreciable accumulation in
`mice, rats, or monkeys and with some accumulation in humans due to its longer elimination half-
`life (~1.5 fold). Liraglutide was highly plasma protein bound in all species (> 98%). Liraglutide
`did not readily cross the blood brain barrier and only very low levels were found in the CNS, but
`the central nervous system is believed to be the site of action for liraglutide’s effect to reduce
`food consumption and body weight gain. Liraglutide circulates as the intact parent drug without
`forming any major circulating human metabolite. Liraglutide is primarily eliminated by peptidase
`
`4 of 162
`
`Reference ID: 3627306
`
`

`

`NDA 206321
`
`Anthony Parola, PhD
`
`metabolism (neutral endopeptidase (NEP) and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4)) with further
`extensive and rapid catabolism of intermediate metabolites prior to excretion in urine, feces, and
`expired air. Only low levels of liraglutide cross the placenta in rats or rabbits. Intact liraglutide
`was secreted in milk from rats. Levels of liraglutide in rat milk were ~50% of maternal plasma
`levels.
`
`Safety and toxicity of liraglutide were evaluated in safety pharmacology studies, single
`and repeat dose toxicity studies, genetic toxicity studies, 2 year carcinogenicity studies in rats
`and mice, reproductive and developmental toxicity studies, local tolerance studies, and
`mechanistic studies of liraglutide-induced thyroid C-cell tumors in rodents. All pivotal nonclinical
`safety studies were reviewed under Victoza NDA 22341.
`In safety pharmacology studies, liraglutide increased heart rate in isolated rabbit hearts
`and in conscious rats, increased arterial blood pressure and decreased body temperature in
`rats, induced diuresis in rats, weakly inhibited acetylcholine-induced smooth muscle contraction
`of isolated guinea pig ileum, and delayed gastric emptying in minipigs. Liraglutide had no effect
`on the QTc interval in conscious telemetered monkeys.
`Liraglutide was well tolerated in chronic repeat dose toxicity studies. Clinical signs of
`toxicity and reduced food consumption were dose-limiting in rats, while transiently reduced food
`consumption and decreased body weight gain were dose limiting in rabbits and monkeys. A
`dose limiting toxicity was not observed in mice.
`Liraglutide immunogenicity did not affect exposure to pharmacologically active drug in
`mice, rats, or monkeys. Liraglutide was not immunogenic in mice or rats, but anti-liraglutide
`antibodies (anti-drug antibodies, ADAs) occurred in one mid-dose monkey and several high
`dose monkeys in chronic repeat dose studies. Neutralizing effects of ADAs were not
`characterized.
`Liraglutide toxicity occurred in thyroid (mice and rats), at injection sites (mice, pigs, and
`monkeys), and it induced a mild anemia (mice, rats, and monkeys). In thyroid, liraglutide caused
`ultimobranchial cysts and/or C-cell focal hyperplasia, a preneoplastic lesion, in 4 & 13 week
`mouse studies, a low incidence of inflammatory cell infiltrate in mice in the carcinogenicity study,
`and C-cell focal hyperplasia and tumors at clinically relevant exposures in carcinogenicity
`studies in both mice and rats. Injection site reactions were characterized as subacute
`inflammation and fat necrosis in pigs and inflammation, necrosis, and fibrosis with repeat dosing
`in monkeys. Although inflammation didn’t occur at injection sites in mice, fibrosarcomas in the
`dorsal skin and subcutis, the body surface used for injection, occurred in high dose male mice in
`the carcinogenicity study using a liraglutide dosing solution that was 10 times more dilute than
`the clinical formulation. Local toxicity of the marketed product evaluated after subcutaneous
`injection in pigs and intramuscular, intravenous, and intra-arterial injection in rabbits showed
`subcutaneous injection site reactions in pigs attributed to vehicle persisted for 5 days after
`dosing and intramuscular, intravenous, or intra-arterial injection of liraglutide did not result in
`severe local toxicity or clinical signs of severe toxicity in rabbits. Mild anemia occurred at
`clinically relevant exposures in some repeat dose studies in mice, rats, and monkeys. In a 13-
`week repeat dose study, liraglutide did not cause pancreas inflammation in male or female
`Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) rats, a rodent model of insulin resistant type 2 diabetes mellitus.
`Liraglutide was not mutagenic or clastogenic in vitro with or without metabolic activation
`in a bacterial reverse mutation assay or a chromosomal aberrations assay in human peripheral
`blood lymphocytes and it was not clastogenic in vivo in erythrocyte micronucleus assays in rats.
`Two-year carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats showed liraglutide is a multi-sex, multi-
`species carcinogen causing thyroid C-cell tumors at clinically relevant exposures in male and
`female mice and rats and fibrosarcomas on the dorsal skin and subcutis of male mice. Human
`relevance of drug-induced C-cell tumors in rodents is unknown and a mode of action for
`liraglutide-induced rodent C-cell tumors has not been established. Mechanistic toxicity studies in
`wild-type and GLP-1R knockout mice showed liraglutide-induced thyroid C-cell hyperplasia and
`
`5 of 162
`
`Reference ID: 3627306
`
`

`

`NDA 206321
`
`Anthony Parola, PhD
`
`increased plasma calcitonin was GLP-1R-dependent, and in normal and hyperplastic thyroid C-
`cells, liraglutide induced phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6, but not the REarranged during
`Transfection (RET) proto-oncogene. Liraglutide-induced proliferative lesions in thyroid C-cells
`were not fully reversed in mice treated for 9 weeks followed by a 15 week recovery period or in
`mice treated for 26 weeks followed by a 78 week recovery period.
`Liraglutide did not affect fertility of male rats, but in female rats treated with liraglutide
`from 2 weeks prior to mating through organogenesis, liraglutide increased the number of early
`embryonic deaths at maternal plasma exposures 11 times systemic exposure in obese humans,
`based on AUC comparison. In fetal rats, liraglutide caused fetal abnormalities of displaced
`kidneys, displaced azygous vein, and irregular ossification in the skull and a more complete
`state of ossification at all doses yielding maternal plasma human exposure multiples > 0.8. At
`the highest dose, mottled liver and minimally kinked ribs occurred at 11-times the human
`exposure. Major abnormalities of misshapen oropharynx or narrowed larynx occurred at 0.8-
`times human exposure and umbilical hernia occurred at 0.8 and 3-times human exposure.
`Pregnant rabbits were treated with liraglutide during organogenesis using doses yielding
`maternal plasma exposures < 1-times human exposure. Liraglutide decreased fetal weight and
`increased the incidence of total major fetal abnormalities at all doses, (2.1%, 3.7%, 5.7%, and
`7.6% of fetuses and 18%, 30%, 35%, and 32% of litters affected by major abnormalities at 0,
`0.01, 0.025, and 0.05 mg/kg liraglutide, respectively). Irregular ossification and/or skeletal
`abnormalities occurred in the skull and jaw, vertebrae and ribs, sternum, pelvis, and scapula.
`Visceral abnormalities occurred in blood vessels and gall bladder. In a prenatal and postnatal
`toxicity study of 0, 0.1, 0.25, or 1 mg/kg liraglutide administered to parental F0 rats from
`gestation day 6 through weaning on lactation day 24, liraglutide delayed delivery to day 22 in
`the majority of treated rats and decreased F1 generation pup weight at all doses during the
`lactation period. Bloody scabs and agitated behavior occurred in male rats descended from
`dams treated with 1 mg/kg/day liraglutide. Group mean body weight from birth to postpartum
`day 14 trended lower in F2 generation rats descended from liraglutide-treated rats compared to
`F2 generation rats descended from controls, but differences did not reach statistical significance
`for any group. In a dose range-finding juvenile toxicity study in rats, liraglutide delayed the onset
`and completion of sexual maturation of male rats, an effect attributed to decreased body weight
`gain, and liraglutide delayed the completion of sexual development of female rats and reduced
`the relative weight of ovaries, effects that occurred in the absence of reduced body weight.
`
`1.3
`
`Recommendations
`
`1.3.1
`
`Approvability
`Based on prior approval of up to 1.8 mg/day liraglutide for the treatment of type 2
`diabetes mellitus, the approval of other long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists that are known or
`suspected to induce rodent thyroid C-cell tumors of unknown human relevance, similar steady
`state systemic exposure to liraglutide in obese adults administered 3.0 mg/day liraglutide
`compared to healthy adults administered 1.8 mg/day, and no new safety concerns from
`nonclinical studies for the proposed indication for weight management in obese adults or
`overweight adults with at least weight-related comorbidity, I recommend approval of up to 3.0
`mg/day liraglutide for the proposed weight management indication. The approved label for
`Victoza and the proposed label for Saxenda both include a boxed warning regarding the
`unknown human relevance of liraglutide-induced thyroid C-cell tumors in rodents. Review of
`post-marketing safety information for Victoza by FDA’s Division of Pharmacovigilance 1
`concluded 6/9 cases of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) reported to the FDA Adverse Event
`Reporting System (FAERS) were possibly related to liraglutide treatment. However, further
`review of Victoza post-marketing case reports of MTC by a thyroid cancer expert in FDA’s
`
`6 of 162
`
`Reference ID: 3627306
`
`

`

`NDA 206321
`
`Anthony Parola, PhD
`
`Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products concluded the relation to liraglutide
`treatment was unknown and these post-marketing reports of MTC were not an impediment to
`recommending approval for a large majority of voting members of an 11 September 2014
`meeting of the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drug Advisory Committee evaluating the benefits
`and risks of 3.0 mg/day liraglutide for the proposed weight management indication.
`
`Additional Non Clinical Recommendations
`
`1.3.2
`None.
`
`Labeling
`1.3.3
`Relevant nonclinical sections in the proposed label are shown below. Recommended deletions
`are shown by strikethrough text and additions are in red font.
`
`HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
`
`
`
`WARNING: RISK OF THYROID C-CELL TUMORS
`See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning.
`Liraglutide causes thyroid C-cell tumors at clinically relevant exposures
`is unknown whether
`Saxenda causes thyroid C-cell tumors, including
`medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), in humans, as human relevance could not be
`determined by clinical or nonclinical studies (5.1).
` Saxenda is contraindicated in patients with a personal or family history of MTC or in
`patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2) (5.1).
`
`. It
`
`∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙INDICATIONS AND USAGE∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙
`Saxenda is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist indicated as an adjunct to a
`reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity for chronic weight management in adult
`patients with an initial body mass index (BMI) of
`30 kg/m2 or greater (obese) (1) or
`
`27 kg/m2 or greater (overweight) in the presence of at least one weight related comorbidity
`
`such as hypertension, dysglycemia (prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus), dyslipidemia
`or obstructive sleep apnea (1)
`
`∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙
` Thyroid C-cell tumors in animals: Counsel patients regarding the risk of medullary thyroid
`carcinoma and the symptoms of thyroid tumors (5.1).
`
`FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
`
`Reference ID: 3627306
`
`7 of 162
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 206321
`
`Anthony Parola, PhD
`
`WARNING: RISK OF THYROID C-CELL TUMORS
`
`Liraglutide causes dose-dependent and treatment-duration-dependent thyroid C-cell tumors
`at clinically relevant exposures in both genders of rats and mice.
`It is unknown whether
`W" Saxenda causes thyroid C—cell tumors, including medullary thyroid carcinoma
`(MTC), in humans, as human relevance could not be ruled out by clinical or nonclinical
`studies. Saxenda is contraindicated in patients with a personal or family history of MTC and
`(mo
`in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2).
`
`(b) (4)
`
`[see Contraindications (4), Warnings and Precautions (5.1)
`
`Risk of Thyroid C-cell Tumors
`5.1
`Liraglutide causes dose-dependent and treatment-duration-dependent thyroid C-cell tumors
`(adenomas and/or carcinomas) at clinically relevant exposures in both genders of rats and mice
`[see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)]. Malignant thyroid C-cell carcinomas were detected in rats
`and mice.
`"M"
`. It is unknown whether
`
`Saxenda will cause thyroid C—cell tumors, including medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), in
`humans, as the human relevance of liraglutide—induced rodent thyroid C-cell tumors
`"M"
`8 determined
`"M"
`
`5.5
`
`Renal lmpairrnent
`
`one)
`
`Pregnancy
`8.1
`Pregnancy Category 3X.
`
`Risk Summary
`There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of Saxenda in pregnant women. Saxenda
`should not be used during pregnancy. If a patient wishes to become pregnant, or pregnancy
`occurs, treatment with Saxenda should be discontinued.
`
`Clinical Considerations
`
`A minimum weight gain, and no weight loss, is recommended for all pregnant women, including
`those who are already overweight or obese, due to the necessary weight gain that occurs in
`maternal tissues during pregnancy.
`
`Animal Data
`Liraglutide has been shown to be teratogenic in rats at or above (”MOB-times
`systemic exposures in obese humans resulting from the maximum recommended human dose
`(MRHD) of 3.0 mg/day based on plasma area under the time-concentration curve (AUC)
`comparison. Liraglutide has been shown to cause reduced growth and increased total major
`abnormalities in rabbits at systemic exposures below
`(”m-exposure in obese humans at the
`MRHD based on plasma AUC comparison.
`
`(I!) (4)
`
`Reference ID: 3627306
`
`80f162
`
`

`

`NDA 206321
`
`Anthony Parola, PhD
`
`Female rats given subcutaneous doses of 0.1, 0.25 and 1.0 mg/kg/day liraglutide beginning 2
`weeks before mating through gestation day 17 had estimated systemic exposures
`0.8-
`3-
`, and
`11-times the
`exposure in obese humans at the MRHD based on plasma AUC
`comparison. The number of early embryonic deaths in the 1 mg/kg/day group increased slightly.
`Fetal abnormalities and variations in kidneys and blood vessels, irregular ossification of the
`skull, and a more complete state of ossification occurred at all doses. Mottled liver and
`minimally kinked ribs occurred at the highest dose. The incidence of fetal malformations in
`liraglutide-treated groups exceeding concurrent and historical controls were misshapen
`oropharynx and/or narrowed opening into larynx at 0.1 mg/kg/day and umbilical hernia at 0.1
`and 0.25 mg/kg/day.
`
`Pregnant rabbits given subcutaneous doses of 0.01, 0.025 and 0.05 mg/kg/day liraglutide from
`gestation day 6 through day 18 inclusive, had estimated systemic exposures less than
`
` exposure in obese humans at the MRHD of 3.0 mg/day at all doses, based on plasma
`AUC comparison. Liraglutide decreased fetal weight and dose-dependently increased the
`incidence of total major fetal abnormalities at all doses. The incidence of malformations
`exceeded concurrent and historical controls at 0.01 mg/kg/day (kidneys, scapula), ≥ 0.01
`mg/kg/day (eyes, forelimb), 0.025 mg/kg/day (brain, tail and sacral vertebrae, major blood
`vessels and heart, umbilicus), ≥ 0.025 mg/kg/day (sternum) and at 0.05 mg/kg/day (parietal
`bones, major blood vessels). Irregular ossification and/or skeletal abnormalities occurred in the
`skull and jaw, vertebrae and ribs, sternum, pelvis, tail, and scapula; and dose-dependent minor
`skeletal variations were observed. Visceral abnormalities occurred in blood vessels, lung, liver,
`and esophagus. Bilobed or bifurcated gallbladder was seen in all treatment groups, but not in
`the control group.
`
`In pregnant female rats given subcutaneous doses of 0.1, 0.25 and 1.0 mg/kg/day liraglutide
`from gestation day 6 through weaning or termination of nursing on lactation day 24, estimated
`systemic exposures were
`0.8-,
`3-, and
`11-times human exposure in obese humans at
`the MRHD of 3.0 mg/day, based on plasma AUC comparison. A slight delay in parturition was
`observed in the majority of treated rats. Group mean body weight of neonatal rats from
`liraglutide-treated dams was lower than neonatal rats from control group dams. Bloody scabs
`and agitated behavior occurred in male rats descended from dams treated with 1 mg/kg/day
`liraglutide. Group mean body weight from birth to postpartum day 14 trended lower in F2
`generation rats descended from liraglutide-treated rats compared to F2 generation rats
`descended from controls, but differences did not reach statistical significance for any group.
`
`8.3 Nursing Mothers
`It is not known whether liraglutide is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted
`in human milk and because of the potential for tumorigenicity shown for liraglutide in animal
`studies, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue Saxenda,
`taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother. In lactating rats, liraglutide was
`excreted unchanged in milk at concentrations approximately 50% of maternal plasma
`concentrations.
`
`13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
`A 104-week carcinogenicity study was conducted in male and female CD-1 mice at doses of
`0.03, 0.2, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg/day liraglutide administered by bolus subcutaneous injection
`yielding systemic exposures
`0.2-, 2.
`10- and
`43-times the exposure in obese humans
` respectively, at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 3.0 mg/day
`based on plasma AUC comparison. A dose-related increase in benign thyroid C-cell adenomas
`was seen in the 1.0 and the 3.0 mg/kg/day groups with incidences of 13% and 19% in males
`
`9 of 162
`
`Reference ID: 3627306
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 206321
`
`Anthony Parola, PhD
`
`and 6% and 20% in females, respectively. C-cell adenomas did not occur in control groups or
`0.03 and 0.2 mglkg/day groups. Treatment-related malignant C-cell carcinomas occurred in 3%
`of females in the 3.0 mglkg/day group. Thyroid C-cell tumors are rare findings during
`carcinogenicity testing in mice. A treatment-related increase in fibrosarcomas was seen on the
`dorsal skin and subcutis, the body surface used for drug injection, in males in the 3 mglkg/day
`group. These fibrosarcomas were attributed to the high local concentration of drug near the
`injection site. The liraglutide concentration in the clinical formulation (6 mg/mL) is 10—times
`higher than the concentration in the formulation used to administer 3 mg/kg/day liraglutide to
`mice in the carcinogenicity study (0.6 mg/mL).
`
`A 104-week carcinogenicity study was conducted in male and female Sprague Dawley rats at
`doses of 0.075, 0.25 and 0.75 mglkg/day liraglutide administered by bolus subcutaneous
`injection with exposures "’""0.5—, ““92- and (”m-times the exposure in obese humans
`respectively, resulting from the MRHD based on plasma AUC comparison. A treatment-related
`increase in benign thyroid C-cell adenomas was seen in males in 0.25 and 0.75 mglkg/day
`liraglutide groups with incidences of 12%, 16%, 42%, and 46% and in all female liraglutide-
`treated groups with incidences of 10%, 27%, 33%, and 56% in 0 (control), 0.075, 0.25, and 0.75
`mg/kg/day groups, respectively. A treatment-related increase in malignant thyroid C—cell
`carcinomas was observed in all male liraglutide-treated groups with incidences of 2%, 8%, 6%,
`and 14% and in females at 0.25 and 0.75 mg/kg/day with incidences of 0%, 0%, 4%, and 6% in
`0 (control), 0.075, 0.25, and 0.75 mglkglday groups, respectively. Thyroid C-cell carcinomas are
`rare findings during carcinogenicity testing in rats.
`
`(In) (4)
`
`Studies in mice demonstrated that “’wliraglutide-induced C-cell proliferation was dependent on
`the GLP—1 receptor
`“m-and that liraglutide did not cause activation of the
`REarranged during Transfection (RET) proto—oncogene in thyroid C-cells.
`
`Human relevance of thyroid C-cell tumors in mice and rats is unknown and could not be
`determined by clinical studies or nonclinical studies [see Boxed Warning and Warnings and
`Precautions (5.1)].
`
`Liraglutide was negative with and without metabolic activation in the Ames test for mutagenicity
`and in a human peripheral blood lymphocyte chromosome aberration test for clastogenicity.
`Liraglutide was negative in repeat-dose in vivo micronucleus tests in rats.
`
`In rat fertility studies using subcutaneous doses of 0.1, 0.25 and 1.0 mglkg/day liraglutide,
`males were treated for 4 weeks prior to and throughout mating and females were treated 2
`weeks prior to and throughout mating until gestation day 17. No direct adverse effects on male
`fertility was observed at doses up to 1.0 mglkg/day, a high dose yielding an estimated systemic
`exposure {31 1-times the
`(”m-exposure in obese humans at the MRHD, based on plasma
`AUC comparison. In female rats, an increase in early embryonic deaths occurred at 1.0
`mglkg/day. Reduced body weight gain and food consumption were observed in females at the
`1.0 mg/kglday dose.
`
`2
`
`Drug Information
`
`2.1
`
`Drug
`
`CAS Registry Number. 0204656—20—2
`Generic Name: liraglutide
`
`Reference ID: 3627306
`
`10 of162
`
`

`

`NDA 206321
`
`Anthony Parola, PhD
`
`Code Name: NNC 90-1170, NNC 0090-0000—1170, NN2211, glipacyl
`Chemical Name: ArguLysze-(N-a-(y-Glu-(N-a-hexadecanoyl)))-GLP-1[7-37]
`Molecular Formula/Molecular Weight C172H265N43051 / 3751.2 Daltons
`Structure or Biochemical Description:
`- 37
`30
`o
`H
`20
`7
`In
`My%906@fiflfififlfl§§flfia§gjamVJ%§BO&@O@@@EE%{WH
`
`f Us.
`YNH
`
`Glu-spncer
`
`0 _.
`T0
`HO
`NH
`x
` 0
`Palmitic acid
`
`C H
`
`3
`
`Figure l
`
`)Iolecular structure of Iiraglutide
`One-letter ammo and codes an: used 1.1: £1115 figure.
`
`[SD1 Module 2.6 Nonclinical Written and Tabulated Summaries Introduction P6]
`
`Phannacologic Class: glucagon-Iike peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist
`
`2.2
`
`Relevant INDs, NDAs, BLAs and DMFs
`
`IND 61040: Iiraglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (opened in October 2000,
`sponsored by Novo Nordisk)
`IND 73206: Iiraglutide for the treatment of obesity (opened September 2008, sponsored by
`Novo Nordisk)
`NDA 22341: Victoza® (Iiraglutide for injection), up to 1.8 mglday Iiraglutide for the treatm

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket