throbber

`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`206073Orig1s000
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`FDA CDER EES
`
`ESTABLISHMENT" EVALUATISZEN REQUEST
`SUMMARY REPORT
`
`Application:
`
`0'
`
`"ode:
`
`Stamp Date:
`
`PDUFA Date:
`
`Action Goal:
`
`NDA 206073/000
`
`510
`
`4
`
`30-JAN-2014
`
`30-JAN-2015
`
`District Goal:
`
`30—AUG—2014
`
`Sponsor:
`
`BOEHRIN-IE ER INGELHEIM
`
`900 RIDGEBURY RD
`
`RIDGEFIELD, CT 06877
`
`Brand Name:
`
`Estab. Name:
`
`EMPAGLIFLOZIN AND LINAGLIPTIN TABLETS
`
`EMPAGLIFLOZIN AND LINAGLIPTIN TABLETS
`
`Generic Name:
`
`LINAGLIPTIN
`
`Produz‘t “inner-2r- Dosage Form; Ingredient; Strengths
`00* ‘ TABLET; LINAGLIPTIN; 5MG
`OUT; TABLET; EMPAGLIFLOZIN; TOMG
`002; TABLET; LINAGLIPTIN; SMG
`CCE; TABLET; EMPAGLIFLC' KIN; EZEMG
`
`FDA Contacts:
`
`J. LEGINUS
`
`E. PFEILER
`
`P. KUMAR
`
`Prod Qua! Reviewer
`
`Micro Reviewer
`
`Product Quality PM
`
`C. CAPPEL—LYNCH
`Regulatory Project Mgr
`
`
`(HFD-8101
`
`(HF-22)
`
`(HFD-BOJ)
`
`3017964102
`
`3017960642
`
`240023722
`
`321 1’338436
`
`
`Overall Recommendation:
`ACCEPTABLE
`on 22‘JUL—2014
`by R. SAFAAI-JAZI
`
`
`()
`
`3017964463
`
`Establishment:
`
`CFN:
`
`9610492
`
`FEI:
`
`3002306556
`
`BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH & CO. KG
`BINGER STREET 173
`
`INGELHEIM AM RHEIN, RHEINLAND—PFALZ, GERMANY
`
`DMF No:
`
`AADA:
`
`'msibilities:
`
`FINISHED DOSAGE MANUFACTURER
`
`a:
`
`TABLETS, PROMPT RELEASE
`
`0:11 Status:
`
`NONE
`
`Last Milestone:
`
`Milestone Date:
`
`Decision:
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`
`10-JUN-2014
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`Reason:
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`
`Establishment:
`
`_.__...._._:F_EE___1..5.;6_6.é.6_.__._.._ __M____. ,.-L_.__..____._,.
`1510690
`CFN:
`BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM ROXANE INC
`
`DMF No:
`
`:‘LLW‘A.
`
`COLUMBUS, , UNITED STATES 432289579
`
`Responsibilities:
`
`FINISHED DOSAGE LABELER
`
`FINISHED DOSAGE PACKAGER
`
`Profile:
`
`TABLETS, PROMPT RELEASE
`
`UAI .oéatus:
`
`NONE
`
`Last Milestone:
`
`Milestone Date:
`
`Decision:
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`
`12~FEB—2014
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`Reason:
`BASED ON PROFILE
`
`
`January 21, 2015 6:44 AM
`
`FDA Confidential - Internal Distribtriion Only
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3699635
`Reference ID: 3699635
`
`

`

`FDA CDER EES
`
`ESTABLISHMENT EVALUATION REQUEST
`SUMMARY REPORT
`
`Establishment:
`
`DMF No:
`
`
`
`AADA:
`
`Responsibilities:
`
`f-‘NSHED DOSAGE OTHER TESTER
`
`Profile:
`
`CONTROL TESTING LABORATORY
`
`OAI Status:
`
`NONE
`
`Lasl Milestone:
`
`Milestone Me:
`
`Decision:
`
`QC RECOMMENDATION
`
`.LE-FEB-2014
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`Reason:
`
`Establishment:
`CFN:
`
`FEl: -—
`
`DlilF No:
`
`
`
`AADA:
`
`Responsibilities:
`
`”INISHED DOSAGE CT HER TESTER
`
`Profile:
`
`CONTROL TESTING LABORATORY
`
`0A! Status:
`
`NONE
`
`Last Milestong:
`
`Milestone Date:
`
`Decision:
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`
`25-FEB-2014
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`Reason:
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`
`
`
`Establishment:
`
`cm: m_——FEI.—
`
`DMF No:
`
`
`
`AADA:
`
`Responsibilities:
`
`FINISHED DOSAGE OTHER TESTER
`
`Profile:
`
`CONTROL TESTING LABORATORY
`
`OAl Status:
`
`NONE
`
`Last Milestone:
`
`Milestone Date:
`
`Decision:
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`
`'- 2~FEB-2014
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`Reason:
`BASED ON PROFILE
`
`
`January 21, 2015 6:44 AM
`
`FDA Confidential - Internal Distribution Only
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3699635
`
`

`

`FEE}: CDEER ILL-"it;
`
`ESTABLISHMENT EVALUAT i;L-3f=I REQUEST
`SUMMARY REFCIE
`
`Eslabllshment:
`
`DMF No:
`
`Responsibilities:
`
`
`
`AADA:
`
`FINISHED DOSAGE LABELER
`FINISHED DOSAGE PACKAGER
`
`Profile:
`
`TABLETS, PROMPT HIE—ELSE
`
`JAI 713.115.
`
`NONE
`
`Last Mllestone:
`
`Milestone Date:
`
`Declslon:
`
`Reason:
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`
`22-JUL-2014
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`
`Establishment:
`
`
`
`DMF No:
`
`ITIAL: .-
`
`Responslbllltles:
`
`FINISHED DOSAGE LABELER
`FINISHED DOSAGE PACKAGER
`
`Profile:
`
`TABLETS, PROMPT RELEASE
`
`0A! fiaiatus:
`
`NONE
`
`mum“;
`
`oc RECOMMENDATION
`
`"meddle Date:
`
`12-FEB-2014
`
`Decision:
`
`Reason:
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`BASED ON PROFILE
`
`January 21, 2016 6:44 AM
`
`FDA Confidentei - Internal Die .:'E..'
`
`. vi Ln OnIy
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3699635
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`MARY GRACE LUBAO
`02/09/2015
`
`Reference ID: 3699635
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`NDA 206073
`
`Glyxambi®
`(Empagliflozin/Linagliptin) Tablet
`
`Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`Joseph Leginus, PhD
`Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
`Division III, Branch VII
`
`For the Division of
`
`Metabolism and Endocrinology Products
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW #1
`
`Reference ID: 3612777
`
`Page 1 of 69
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Table of Contents .....................................................................................................2
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet.................................................................................3
`
`The Executive Summary .........................................................................................7
`
`I. Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 7
`
`A. Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability ....................................................................... 7
`
`B. Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post-Marketing) Commitments. Agreements, and/or Risk
`Management Steps, if Approvable ................................................................................................... 7
`
`II. Summary of Chemistry Assessments......................................................................................... 7
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s) ............................................................. 7
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used.......................................................... 9
`
`C. Basis for Approvability or Not-Approval Recommendation ............................................................ 9
`
`111. Administrative......................................................................................................................... 11
`
`A. Reviewer’s Signature: in DAARTS. .............................................................................................. 11
`
`B. Endorsement Block: in DAARTS ................................................................................................... 11
`
`C. CC Block:
`
`in DAARTS. ............................................................................................................. 11
`
`Chemistry Assessment ........................................................................................... 12
`
`1. Review of Common Technical Document-Quality (Ctd—Q) Module 3.2: Body of Data .......... 12
`
`S DRUG SUBSTANCES .................................................................................................................. 12
`
`P DRUG PRODUCT ........................................................................................................................ 19
`
`A APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................... 59
`
`R REGIONAL INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 59
`
`II. Review of Common Technical Document-Quality (Ctd—Q) Module 1 ...................................60
`
`A. Labeling & Package Insert ............................................................................................................. 60
`
`B. Environmental Assessment or Claim of Categorical Exclusion .................................................... 67
`
`Reference ID: 361 2777
`
`Page 2 of 69
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`Document Date
`
`Document Date
`
`30-Jan-2014
`
`24-Jun-2014
`
`1. NDA 206073
`
`2
`
`. REVIEW #2 1
`
`3 4
`
`. REVIEW DATE: 19-Aug-2014
`
`. REVIEWER: Joseph Leginus, PhD
`
`5 . PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS:
`
`Previous Documents
`
`N/A
`
`6. SUBMISSION(S) BEING REVIEWED:
`
`Submission; 3 1 Reviewed
`Original NDA
`Amendment
`
`7. NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:
`
`Name:
`
`Address:
`
`Representative:
`
`Telephone:
`
`Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`
`900 Ridgebury Road, PO Box 368
`Ridgefield, CT 06877
`Chung Lee-Sogaard
`Associate Director, Regulatory Affairs
`
`203-798-4224
`
`8. DRUG PRODUCT NAME/CODE/TYPE:
`
`a) Proprietary Name: Glyxambi
`b) Non-Proprietary Name CNN): Empagliflozin/Linagliptin
`c) Code Name/# (ONDC only): Empagliflozin/Linagliptin Fihn—coated Tablets
`Type/Submission Priority (ONDC only):
`
`0 Chem. Type: 4 (New combination)
`
`0 Submission Priority: Standard
`
`9. LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBMISSION: This NDA is submitted as a 505(b)(1)
`application.
`
`Reference ID: 361 2777
`
`Page 3 of 69
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`10. PHARMACOL. CATEGORY:
`
`Empagliflozin is an inhibitor of the sodium—dependent glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-Z),
`the major transporter responsible for renal glucose reabsorption; Linagliptin is an
`inhibitor of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP—4) for use in the treatment of type 2
`diabetes mellitus.
`
`ll. DOSAGE FORM: Immediate release tablet Gilm—Coated)
`
`12. STRENGTH/POTENCY:
`
`Empagliflozin/Linagliptin tablets are manufactured in two strengths: 10 mg/5 mg and 25
`mg/5 mg represented as empagliflozin mg/linagliptin mg.
`
`13. ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Oral
`
`14. RX/OTC DISPENSED:
`
`X Rx
`
`OTC
`
`15. SPOTS {SPECIAL PRODUCTS ON-LINE TRACKlNG SYSTEM):
`
`
`SPOTS product — Form Completed
`
`X Not a SPOTS product
`
`16. CHEMICAL NAME, STRUCTURAL FORMULA, MOLECULAR
`
`FORMULA, MOLECULAR WEIGHT:
`
`A. Empagliflozin
`Chemical Name: D—Glucitol, l ,S—anhydro-l-C-[4—chloro—3-[[4—[[(3S)—tetrahydro—3—
`furanyl]oxy]phenyl]methyl]phenyl]-, (l S)
`Structural Formula:
`
`
`
`Molecular Formula: C23H27C107
`
`Molecular Weight: 450.91 g/mol
`
`Reference ID: 3612777
`
`Page 4 of 69
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`B. Linagliptin
`Chemical Name: 8-[(3R)—3-aminopiperidin— l -yl]-7—but—2-yn— l —yl—3—methyl- 1 - [(4-
`methquuinazolin-2-yl)methyl]-3 ,7-dihydro— 1 H-purine— 2,6—dione.
`Structural Formula:
`
`0
`//CH3
`©:’/N )\ I N%N
`
`O
`
`CH3
`
`N
`
`t|3H3
`
`"”2
`
`Molecular Formula: C25H28N802
`Molecular Weight: 472 gig/mo]
`Chirality: One chiral center (R conformation).
`
`17. RELATED/SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
`
`A. DMFs:
`
`
`3
`Date Review
`
`Com leted Item Referenced
`
`Stan's
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Action codes for DMF Table:
`l — DIVIF Reviewed.
`
`Other codes indicate why the DMF was not reviewed. as follows:
`2 —Type 1 DMF
`3 — Reviewed previously and no revision since last review
`4 — Sufficient information in application
`5 — Authority to reference not granted
`6 — DMF not available
`
`7 — Other (explain under "Comments")
`
`Reference ID: 3612777
`
`Page 5 of 69
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`2 Adequate. Inadequate. or N/A (There is enough data in the application. therefore the DMF did not need to
`be reviewed)
`
`B. Other Documents:
`
`”—
`
`
`
`Applicant]Sponsor is Boehringer Ingelheim
`
`18. STATUS:
`
`ONDC:
`CONSULTS/ CMC
`
`EES
`
`Pharm/Tox
`
`recommendation of
`Accetable has been rovided.
`
`22-Jul-2014
`
`N/A
`
`below ICH qualification
`thresholds.
`
`.
`
`Biopharmaceutics evaluation
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Joseph Leginus
`
`Methods Validation
`
`N°t quurred_ N0 novel
`methods.
`
`EA
`
`Microbiology
`
`Conducted by CMC reviewer.
`Granting the categorical
`exclusion as per 21 CFR
`25.31 0
`
`Recommended for approval
`from the standpoint of product
`uuali microbiolo 3 .
`
`19-Aug-2014
`
`8-Aug—2014
`
`Erika Pfeiler
`
`l9. ORDER OF REVIEW: N/A
`
`Reference ID: 361 2777
`
`Page 6 of 69
`
`

`

`
`
`Executive Summary Section
`
`The Chemistry Review for NDA 206073
`
`The Executive Summafl
`
`I.
`
`Recommendations
`
`A.
`
`Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability
`
`The recommendation from a CMC perspective is Approval, pending:
`
`A recommendation from Biophannaceutics regarding adequacy of dissolution
`testing of the drug product, currently pending.
`
`B.
`
`Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post—Marketing) Commitments, Agreements,
`and/or Risk Management Steps, if Approvable
`
`Not applicable.
`
`Summary of Chemistry Assessments
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s)
`
`DRUG SUBSTANCES
`
`Glyxambi is a combination product containing two drug substances: empagliflozin and
`linagliptin.
`
`Empagliflozin
`Empagliflozin (an NME) is described in NDA 204629 for empagliflozin tablets which
`received a Complete Response on 3/4/2014. This was due to a Withhold recommendation
`from the Office of Compliance following an inspection at the Boehringer Ingelheim
`Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany drug substance/drug product
`manufacturing plant. NDA 204629 was approved on Aug 1, 2014 after an overall cGMP
`recommendation was made by the Office of Compliance upon resubmission of the NDA.
`Information for empagliflozin is provided in the sponsor’s NDA 204629 and is
`incorporated by reference herein.
`
`Reference ID: 361 2777
`
`Page 7 of 69
`
`

`

`
`
`Executive Summary Section
`
`Linagliptin
`The drug substance linagliptin is described in NDA 201280 for Tradj enta® (linagliptin)
`tablet which was approved on May 2, 2011. Information for linagliptin is provided in the
`Applicant’s approved NDA 201280 and is incorporated by reference herein.
`
`DRUG PRODUCT
`
`Glyxambi (empagliflozin/linagliptin) tablet is formulated as a fixed-dose combination,
`immediate—release, film—coated tablet for oral administration containing two drug
`substances, empagliflozin and linagliptin. Two dosage strengths have been developed
`containing two levels of empagliflozin (10 mg or 25 mg) and a fixed amount of
`linagliptin (5 mg). The two tablets are identical in shape (arc triangular, flat faced, bevel-
`edged fihn—coated tablets) but are distinguished by color and debossing. The 10 mg/5 mg
`tablets are pale yellow and one side is debossed with "10/5" while the 25 mg/5 mg tablets
`are pale pink and one side is debossed with "25/5". Total weight for each strength tablet
`is 185 mg.
`
`The two strength tablets are formulated with the same excipients in slightly differing
`amounts. Excipients including mannitol, pregelatinized starch, corn starch, copovidone,
`crospovidone, magnesium stearate and talc are part of the tablet core. The film coat is
`based on
`(m4) Yellow (10 mg/5 mg) and
`mm) (25 mg/5 mg) mixtures
`which consist of hypromellose (m4), mannitol, titanium dioxide, talc, polyethylene glycol
`m4) and ferric oxide yellow and red, respectively. No novel excipients are used to
`manufacture empagliflozin/linagliptin tablets. All excipients have compendial references
`and are identified in FDA's Inactive Ingredients Database as inactive ingredients found in
`other oral tablet products at levels higher than those described above for
`empagliflozin/linagliptin tablets.
`
`Empagliflozin/linagliptin tablets are manufactured
`
`mu)
`
`Tablets are packaged in a) high density
`polyethylene plastic bottles (60 cc and 375 cc) containing 30, 90 or 1000 tablets, and b)
`aluminum—
`(m4) blisters containing 10 tablets.
`
`The proposed release specifications include description (visual), identification (HPLC
`and UV), degradation products fl—IPLC), assay GIPLC), content uniformity,
`disintegration, and microbiological quality. Batch analysis data from 8 clinical and
`stability lots manufactured at commercial scale at the proposed site for commercial
`production show that the drug products meet the specifications proposed.
`
`Results from stability studies show that empagliflozin/linagliptin tablets packaged in
`either HDPE bottles or blister packs remain stable through a) 12 months at the long-term
`storage condition of 25°C/60% RH, and b) 6 months at the accelerated condition of
`40°C/75% RH. The drug product also demonstrates good stability when exposed to
`
`Reference ID: 361 2777
`
`Page 8 of 69
`
`

`

`
`
`Executive Summary Section
`
`ambient and high humidity conditions for longer than the in-use period. Photostability
`studies indicate no effect on the product due to exposure to light. Based on these data,
`and following the recommendations outlined in ICH QEl Evaluation of Stability Data, a
`shelf-life of 24 months is gamed for empagliflozin/linagliptin tablets 10 mng mg and 25
`ng5 mg when maintained at 25°C/60% relative humidig in the proposed container
`closure systems. This is in agreement with the Applicant’s proposed expiry period for the
`drug product.
`
`Boehringer Ingelheim requested a categorical exclusion from submitting an
`environmental assessment for the drug product empagliflozin/linagliptin tablets based on
`the regulations in 21 CFR, part 25, section 25.31(b). The request is granted.
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used
`
`Glyxambi combines two antihyperglycemic agents (empagliflozin and linagliptin) with
`complementary mechanisms of action to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2
`diabetes.
`
`Empagliflozin is an inhibitor of the sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT—Z).
`SGLT—2 accounts for about 90 percent of glucose reabsorption into the blood. Therefore,
`an SGLT-2 inhibitor such as empagliflozin may be effective at reducing blood glucose
`levels by blocking glucose reabsorption in the kidney and allowing glucose to be excreted
`in the urine.
`
`Linagliptin is an orally-active inhibitor of DPP-4, an enzyme that degrades the incretin
`hormones glucagon-like peptide-l (GLP—1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic
`polypeptide (GIP). Thus, linagliptin increases the concentrations of active incretin
`hormones, stimulating the release of insulin in a glucose-dependent manner and
`decreasing the levels of glucagon in the circulation.
`
`Empagliflozin/linagliptin is formulated as an immediate-release tablet for once-daily oral
`administration. The recommended starting dose is 10 mg/5 mg. The dose may be
`increased to 25 mg/5 mg in patients who require additional glycemic control.
`
`C. Basis for Approvability or Not-Approval Recommendation
`
`This is a 505(b)(1) application where one of the two drug substances, empagliflozin, is a
`New Molecular Entity (NME). Information for the drug substances, empagliflozin and
`linagliptin are provided in the Applicant’s NDA 204629 for Empagliflozin tablets
`(recommended for approval from a CMC perspective) and their approved NDA 201280
`for Tradjenta® (linagliptin) tablets, respectively.
`
`The drug product will be manufactured as immediate-release tablets at the Boehringer
`Ingelheim Pharma facility in Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany. Drug product specifications
`include attributes standard for this type of dosage form. Limits on degradation products
`
`Reference ID: 3612777
`
`Page 9 of 69
`
`

`

` CHENIISTRY REVIEW
`
`Executive Smmnary Section
`
`are within applicable ICH thresholds. Eight clinical and stability lots have been
`manufactured at commercial scale at the proposed site for commercial production with
`each lot meeting the specifications proposed. Stability of the drug product has been
`adequately established in the two container closure systems, HDPE bottles and blister
`packs to grant a shelf-life of 24 months when stored at controlled room temperature.
`
`The risk from a safety perspective for this combination drug product is anticipated to be
`low since each drug substance in empagliflozin/linagliptin is an active ingredient in two
`of the Applicant’s previously submitted drug products at similar strengths: NDA 204629
`for Empagliflozin tablets (recommended for approval from a CMC perspective) and the
`approved NDA 201280 for Tradjenta® (linagliptin) tablets, respectively.
`
`ONDQA Risk Assessment
`
`From Initial Quali Assessment
`Product
`
`Risk
`Factors That Can
`Impact the CQA Ranking*
`
`Risk Mitigation
`Approach
`
`Risk
`Evaluation
`
`Lifecycle
`Considerations/
`
`Comments**
`
`Attribute/
`
`CQA
`
`Assay,
`Stability
`
`Physical
`Stability
`(solid state)
`
`
`
`. Formulation
`0 Container
`
`Closure
`
`0 Raw Materials
`. Process
`
`0 Parameters
`
`o Scale/Equipment
`o Slte
`
`o Formulation
`
`0 Container
`
`Closure
`
`. Raw Materials
`
`0 Process
`
`. Parameters
`
`o Scale/Equipment
`0 SI“?
`
`0 Formulation
`
`0 Container
`
`Closure
`
`0 Raw Materials
`
`. Process
`
`0 Parameters
`
`o Scale/Equipment
`. Site
`
`Acceptable
`
`Linagliptin-
`related Single
`Impurity > 33%
`
`Empagliflozin-
`and Linagliptin-
`related
`
`impurities in
`accordance with
`
`the ICH
`
`Q3B(R2)-
`
`Empagliflozin —
`no polymorphs.
`
`Linagliptin —
`two polymorphs.
`(b) (4)
`
`Acceptable
`
`l' Acceptable 1
`
`Microbial
`
`Limits
`
`SeeRi_kAssessment—ythe Microbiology reviewer.
`
`Reference ID: 361 2777
`
`Page 10 of 69
`
`

`

`
`
`Executive Summary Section
`
`See Risk Assessment by the Biopharmaceutics reviewer. Other
`
`CQAs
`
`*Risk ranking applies to product attribute/CQA
`**For example, post marketing commitment, knowledge management post approval, etc.
`
`Acceptable cGMP recommendations have been received from the Office of Compliance
`for all manufacturing and testing facilities. An Overall Compliance recommendation of
`Acceptable was provided on 22-Jul-2014.
`
`A recommendation for approval from the standpoint of product quality microbiology was
`provided on 08-Aug-2014.
`
`At this time, recommendations from Biopharmaceutics regarding adequacy of dissolution
`testing of the drug product.
`
`III. Administrative
`
`A. Reviewer’s Signature: in DAARTS.
`
`B. Endorsement Block: in DAARTS.
`
`C. CC Block: in DAARTS.
`
`58 Page(s) has been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCIITS) immediately following this page
`
`Reference ID: 3612777
`
`Page 11 of 69
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`JOSEPH LEGINUS
`08/19/2014
`
`DANAE D CHRISTODOULOU
`08/19/2014
`I concur with the reviewer's conclusions and recommendation
`
`Reference ID: 3612777
`
`

`

`ONDQA Initial Quality Assessment (IQA) and Filing Review
`For new NDAs
`
`IQA and Filing Review Cover Sheet
`
`1. NEW DRUG APPLICATION NUMBER: 206073
`
`2. DATES AND GOALS:
`
`Letter Date: 29—JAN-2014
`PDUFA Goal Date: 30-JAN-2015
`
`3. PRODUCT PROPERTIES:
`
`Submission Received Date : 30—JAN—2014
`
`Trade or Proprietary Name:
`Established Name (USAN):
`
`Not yet finalized
`E n a ‘ iflozin/lina (1i tin
`
`
`
`Route of Administration _
`10/5 and 25/5 m,
`Rx/OTC Dis ensed _
`4.
`INDICATION. Treatment of type 2 diabetes
`
`5. DRUG SUBSTANCE STRUCTURAL FORMULA:
`
`Empagli ozin
`D-Glucitol, 1 .5-anhydro-l -C-[4-chloro-3-[[4-[[(3 S)-tetrahydro-3-fi1ranyl]oxy]phenyl]methyl]phenyl]-. (1 S)
`C23H27C107
`450.91 g/mol
`
`
`
`Linagliptin
`1H-Purine-2.6-dione. 8-[(3R)-3-amino-l-piperidinyl]-7-(2-butyn-1-yl)-3.7-dihydro-3-methyl-l-[(4-methyl-
`2-quinazolinyl)methyl]-
`C25H28N802
`
`472.54 g/mol
`
`6. NAME OF APPLICANT (as indicated on Form 356h): Boehringer Ingelheim
`
`7. SUBMISSION PROPERTIES:
`
`(select one) _tandard
`Review Priori
`Submission Classification
`
`Breakthrou- n Thera _o
`
`(Chemical Classification Code)
`Application Type _05(b)(1)
`
`Page 1 of 15
`
`Reference ID: 3473661
`
`

`

`ONDQA Initial Quality Assessment (IQA) and Filing Review
`
`For new NDAs
`
`Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products
`CMC Lead: Suong (Su) Tran
`
`
`
`Responsible Organization
`(Clinical Division)
`8. CONSULTS:
`CONSULT
`Biometrics
`Clinical Pharmacology
`Establishment Evaluation
`Request (EER)
`x
`
`Pharmacology/Toxicology
`Impurity degradants are below ICH qualification thresholds.
`
`
`Methods Validation
`To be determined by Primary Reviewer
`x
`
`Environmental Assessment
`Categorical exclusion request to be reviewed by Primary
`Reviewer
`x
`
`CDRH
`
`Does the submission contain any of the following elements? No
`Nanotechnology
`QbD Elements
`PET
`
`YES NO
`
`x
`
`x
`x
`
`
`COMMENTS:
`
`
`
`To be sent by ONDQA-PM
`
`
`Is a team review
`recommended?
`
`Other, please explain
`
`Yes - One CMC reviewer and one Biopharmaceutics reviewer are needed
`to review the drug product information of the new NDA. Reference is
`made to the approved NDA 201280 (linagliptin) and the pending NDA
`204629 (empagliflozin) for all CMC information on the drug substances.
`
`
`
`Overall Filing Conclusions and Recommendations
`
`CMC:
`Is the Product Quality Section of the application fileable from a CMC perspective? Yes
`Are there potential CMC review issues to be forwarded to the Applicant with the 74-Day
`letter? No
`
`
`Biopharmaceutics: See the Biopharmaceutics filing review attached at the end of this IQA.
`
`Is the Product Quality Section of the application fileable from a Biopharmaceutics
`perspective? Yes
`Are there potential Biopharmaceutics review issues to be forwarded to the Applicant with
`the 74-Day letter? Yes
`1. Provide supportive validation data for the dissolution method (i.e., method robustness,
`etc.) and analytical method (precision, accuracy, linearity, stability, etc.).
`2. Submit SAS Transport files of the pharmacokinetic data from the BE study. The data
`should include AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, Cmax, Tmax, Kel, and T1/2 as shown. Please submit
`the data in the following format:
`
`SUBJ SEQ PER TRT AUCT AUCI CMAX TMAX KE Thalf
`
` Microbiology: See Microbiology Filing Review in DARRTS for details and for any potential
`Page 2 of 15
`
`
`Microbiology review issues.
`
`
`Reference ID: 3473661
`
`

`

`ONDQA Initial Quality Assessment (IQA) and Filing Review
`For new NDAs
`
`Summary of Critical Issues and Complexities
`
`Previous quality-related meeting between ONDQA and the sponsor:
`Comments from FDA’s letter dated 14-AUG-2013:
`
`Does the Division have any comments about the proposed approach for Module 3 and Q08 of
`the empagliflozin + linagliptin F DC NDA?
`
`FDA Pre-Meeting Response
`
`We agree with your proposed Module 3 sections and QOS of the new NDA. We remind you to
`include in the NDA a complete list of all testing and manufacturing facilities used for the drug
`substances and drug product in Form 356h of the NDA, with detailed contact information and a
`statement that all facilities are ready for the GMP inspection at the time of the NDA submission.
`
`Mimi
`
`The single entity tablets empagliflozin and linagliptin that were used in the pivotal safety and
`efficacy Study 1275.1 and the relative bioavailability Study 1275.3 are equivalent formulations
`to the to-be-marketed empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg tablets described in NDA 204629 (submitted
`March 5, 2013) and to the marketed TRADJENTA 5 mg tablets described in NDA 201280
`(approved May 2, 201 1). At the start of study 1275.1, the empagliflozin + linagliptin FDC
`tablets in Study 1275.1 were
`m’to the empagliflozin . linagliptin FDC tablets used in the
`bioavailability Study 1275.3, which supports equivalence of the FDC to its components. During
`the 1275.1 trial. there was a minor change to the arrantitative. commsitinn of the. FDC tahleremw
`
`(”min the FDC tablets when compared to the FDC tablets used in
`1275.3 and first used in trial 1275.1. This change was not deemed to impact the bioavailability
`of the active components. Considering these data. Bl believes that reference to the NDAs for
`the individual drug products to support safety and efficacy of empagliflozin and linagliptin is
`appropriate. Does the Division concur with 31’s approach?
`
`FDA Pre-Meeting Resmnse
`
`Biggharmaceutics:
`
`This submission did not include a comparative qualitative and quantitative composition of the
`FDC formulation for the pre- and post change. However, based on the percent change
`mentioned in the question above, this manufacturing change could be considered minor requiring
`dissolution profiles comparisons. Therefore, to support the bridging of these formulations,
`provide the following information in the NDA submission:
`
`1. Comparative qualitative and quantitative composition of the FDC formulation for both
`strengths of your product for the pre- and post change.
`
`2. Comparative dissolution data using the regulatory dissolution method for each FDC
`tablet strength manufactured pre- and post- the proposed changes. Also, provide
`individual (n=12), mean, minimum, maximum, RSD, profile data, and calculate the
`similarity factor f2 values.
`
`Page 3 of 15
`
`Reference ID: 3473661
`
`

`

`ONDQA Initial Quality Assessment (IQA) and Filing Review
`
`For new NDAs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3473661
`
`Page 4 of 15
`
`

`

`ONDQA Initial Quality Assessment (IQA) and Filing Review
`
`For new NDAs
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3473661
`
`

`

`0NDQA Initial Quality Assessment (IQA) and Filing Review
`For new NDAs
`
`Drug Substance
`
`The drug substance empagliflozin is described in NDA 204629 (submitted March 5, 2013)
`for empagliflozin film-coated tablets. which is currently under review. The drug substance
`linagliptin is described in NDA 201280 for linagliptin film-coated tablets. for which
`marketing authorization was granted (approved May 2. 2011). Both drug substances are
`therefore not covered in Module 3 for empagliflozin/ linagliptin film-coated tablets or in this
`Quality Overall Surmnary.
`
`Drug Product
`The film-coated tablets consist of immediate release empagliflozin and immediate release
`linagliptin with the strengths of 10/5 and 25/5 mg/mg (empagliflozin/linagliptin).
`
`Composition. (see the copied co
`exci ient. Ma
`
`esium stearate
`
`sition table at the end of this review) There is no novel
`
`Comparability of the product used in the clinical studies, stabilifl studies, and commercial
`product. Product batches 108244 (10/5 mg/mg) and 108247 (25/5 mg/mg) were used in the
`pivotal clinical study 1275.1. These batches have the commercial formulation and were
`manufactured at the commercial site/scale, packaged in the commercial container/closure
`systems. They are submitted as primary stability batches in the NDA.
`
`Product manufacture.
`
`Drug product spgcification. (see the copied specification at the end of this review)
`The drug product specification includes attributes standard for this type of dosage form
`Limits on degradation products are within applicable ICH thresholds. Only two degradants are
`found above the ICH reporting threshold during the stress and primary stability studies (copied
`below). Limits on both degradants are within applicable ICH qualification thresholds.
`-s the major degradation product of the active ingredient linagliptin observed in
`‘ ozin/ lina
`' tin film-coated tablets. This ' m is derived fi'om linagliptin by
`structure is shown in Fieure
`
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 15
`
`Reference ID: 3473661
`
`

`

`ONDQA Initial Quality Assessment (IQA) and Filing Review
`For new NDAs
`
`(b) (4)
`is the major degradation product of the active ingredient empagliflozin (heated in
`empatzliflozin n linatzliptin film-coated tablets. This impun‘tv is the
`(b) ‘4)
`mmrhe structure IS shown in
`
`name 1 l.
`
`(b) (4)
`
`All dissolution-related infomlation. including disintegration. will be evaluated by the ONDQA
`Biopharmaceutics team. Of the several attributes omitted from the drug product specification.
`these two specific omissions will be evaluated by the reviewer:
`M“) (claimed by the
`applicant not to be a Critical Quality Attribute because it
`"m"
`, and enantiomeric purity (claimed by the applicant to undergo no change during
`stress stability of the product).
`
`Container closure systems. The drug product will be packaged in HDPE bottles and aluminum
`blisters. The applicant states that the safety of the product-contact packaging components is
`shown by compliance to the indirect food additives. Applicable USP testing per <671> for water
`vapor transmission was conducted. Compatibility is shown by stability data supporting both
`packaging systems. The reviewer will review information in the NDA and DMFs per internal
`policy on the review of container closure systems for solid oral dosage form drug products.
`
`Stabilifl. Sufiicient stability data are provided in the submission for filing. The primary reviewer
`will determine the final expiry based on all available data and per ICH QlE Evaluation of
`Stability Data. For the six product batches (3 of each strength) manufactured by the commercial
`process/site/scale: Stability data are provided for 12 months at 25 °C/60% RH. and 30 °C/75%
`RH and for 6 months at 40 °C/75% RH. Additional data are provided for the stress studies (heat,
`humidity. and photostability).
`
`Comparabilifl protocol. None proposed.
`
`FILING REVIEW CHECKLIST
`
`The following parameters are necessary in order to initiate a fill] review. i.e.. complete enough to
`review but may have deficiencies. On initial overview of the NDA application for filing:
`
`A. GENERAL
`
`'
`
`
`
`__
`1
`Is the CMC section organized
`adequately?
`Is the CMC section indexed and
`
`....... ll—ad- a uatel ?
`—ll—'
`
`section legible?
`
`Page 7 of 15
`
`Reference ID: 3473661
`
`

`

`
`
`4.
`
`
`
`*
`
`
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`
`
`7.
`
`ONDQA Initial Quality Assessment (IQA) and Filing Review
`
`For new NDAs
`
`Has all information requested
`during the IND phase, and at the
`
`pre-NDA meetings been
`included?
`
`x
`
`
`
`
`
`x
`
`x
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B. FACILITIES*
`If any information regarding the facilities is omitted, this should be addressed ASAP with the
`applicant and

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket