throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`205580Orig1s000
`
`CLINICAL REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Division of Hematology Products
`
`205580
`38
`bendamustine
`Eagle
`Alexandria Schwarsin, MD
`January 31, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NDA #:
`SDN:
`Drug(s):
`Applicant:
`Primary Reviewer:
`Received Date:
`
`This is a 505(b)(2) application. Clinical information for review was not included in the
`application. The clinical team participated in labeling meetings and agreed with the final
`Prescribing Information.
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4237221
`Reference ID: 4266336
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`ALEXANDRIA N SCHWARSIN
`03/21/2018
`
`YVETTE L KASAMON
`03/21/2018
`
`Reference ID: 4237221
`Reference ID: 4266336
`
`

`

`File Memorandum
`
`NDA: 205580
`
`Applicant: Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`Product: Bendamustine injection 100 mg/4 mL
`
`Submission date: June 30, 2013
`
`Review Completion Date: Electronic Stamp
`
`Clinical reviewer: Adam George, PharmD.
`
`Clinical team leader: Virginia Kwitkowski, M.S., R.N., A.C.N.P.-B.C.
`
`Regarding: Clinical review of NBA 205580
`
`Application background
`The Applicant has submitted a 505(b)(2) application for a ready to dilute injection formulation of
`Bendamustine hydrochloride. The listed product Treanda® (bendamustine hydrochloride) is a
`lyophilized powder formulation which requires reconstitution. No clinical data investigating the
`use of the Applicant’s proposed ready to dilute formulation were submitted with this application.
`On January 8, 2014 the Applicant submitted a 120 day safety update.
`M“)
`
`These data are not applicable to NBA 205580
`
`(m4)
`
`During review of the application the biopharmaceutics review identified a potential clinical issue
`with the Applicant’s proposed formulation in that the Applicant’s formulation once diluted for
`administration has a higher osmolality than the listed product. The CMC discipline sent the
`Applicant an Information Request to provide justification for the difference in osmolality
`between the proposed diluted drug product and the reference diluted drug product. In their
`response the Applicant provided Table 1.
`
`Reference ID: 3506008
`Reference ID: 4266336
`
`

`

`
`Table l . Comparison of Treanda and Applicant Proposed Admixtures
`Product
`Eu ~ le
`Treanda
`Eu _le
`Treanda
`En \ le
`Treanda
`Admixture Vehicle
`-
`2.5” ‘o Dextrose!
`-
`.
`0.9% I\aC1
`0.450530
`0.9% .\aCl
`
`BDM HCl
`Concentration
`
`(mg/mL)
`Measured
`Osmolality
`(anSIn/lig).
`Volume of
`admixture after
`
`addition of drug
`product 1mm"
`
`0.2
`
`0.2
`
`_
`
`_
`Estimated Molalitv (moles/k2
`
`\"I \‘U
`
`
`
`
`
`Treanda
`Ea _le
`2.5% Dextrose.”
`().45°1¢Na(‘l
`(W)
`
`(”N“)
`
`BDM HCl
`Manuitol
`Mouotllloflycerol
`PG
`PEG 400
`
`" n=2 per set of vehiclelconcemrauon comomauons
`I’Assumes ideal mixing and volumes are additive
`
`"’"4’
`
`The Applicant addressed the potential of formulation changes (including osmolality) to impact
`the safety profile was addressed in preclinical studies. The hemolytic properties of the
`Applicant’s formulation were assessed in vitro with human whole blood. A comparison to the
`listed drug, Treanda, was also investigated. Additionally, a local irritation study in rabbits was
`conducted to assess potential local irritation that could arise from these admixtures. The results
`of these studies indicate that Bendamustine HCl Injection (Eagle) is not hemolytic at
`bendamustine HCl concentrations of 0.7 to 5.6 mg/mL.
`
`Reviewer comment: It is the opinion of this reviewer that the increased osmolality of the Eagle
`formulation of bendamustine will not result in a clinically meaningful increase in toxicities
`associated with administration of a hyperonotic intravenous solution (i.e., phlebitis and/or
`infusion site reactions). In clinical practice chemotherapy is typically administered to patients
`via central venous access (e.g., peripherally inserted central catheter or Hickman catheter).
`Administration of chemotherapeutic agents through central venous access minimizes the risks of
`phlebitis associated with drugs that are hyperosmolar due the increased venous blood flow with
`central venous access. An article by Gazitua et al evaluated the risk ofphlebitis based upon the
`osmolality of the infusate. The lowest identified risk group was solutions with an osmolarity
`lower than 450 mOsm/L. The upper limit for the range of osmolality with the proposed Eagle
`formulation is (mo mOsm/kg.l
`
`The listed drug Treanda is labeled for phlebitis and infusion site reactions which will also be
`communicated in the prescribing information for this (b)(2) formulation. In addition, it would
`not be feasible to conduct a clinical trial to quantify the possible increased risk of phlebitis with
`the Applicant’s hyperosmolar formulation compared to Treanda as this would require an
`extremely large number ofpatients.
`
`1 Gazitua R. et a1. Factors determining peripheral vein tolerance to amino acid infusions. Arch Surg 1979;114:897-
`900.
`
`Reference ID: 3506008
`Reference ID: 4266336
`
`

`

`Conclusion: This reviewer recommends approval of this 505(b)(2) application.
`
`Reference ID: 3506008
`Reference ID: 4266336
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`ADAM N GEORGE
`05/13/2014
`
`VIRGINIA E KWITKOWSKI
`05/13/2014
`
`Reference ID: 3506008
`Reference ID: 4266336
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket