throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`204063Orig1s000
`
`
`OTHER REVIEW(S)
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MEMORANDUM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
` Public Health Service
`
`
` Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________________________________________________
`
`Division of Neurology Products (HFD-120)
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`Date: March 20, 2013
`
`From: Lois M. Freed, Ph.D.
`
`Supervisory Pharmacologist
`
`Subject: NDA 204-063 (BG-00012, dimethyl fumarate, TECFIDERA), labeling
`recommendations.
`________________________________________________________________________
`
`Recommendations for labeling are provided in this memo; the sponsor’s proposed
`labeling was used as the base document. These labeling recommendations take into
`account those provided by Dr. Banks-Muckenfuss (cf. Pharmacology/Toxicology NDA
`Review and Evaluation, NDA 204063, Melissa K. Banks-Muckenfuss, Ph.D., 1/28/2013)
`and some, but not all, of the additional comments provided by the sponsor. Plasma
`exposure (AUC) margins were calculated using values in humans from repeat-dose
`studies (# 109HV103 and 109HV104): Cmax: 2.24-2.4 µg/mL; AUC: 10-11.3 µg*hr/mL.
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3279692
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`SPONSOR
`
`
`RECOMMENDED
`
`
`HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
`-----INDICATIONS AND USAGE-----
`-----INDICATIONS AND USAGE-----
`TECFIDERA is indicated for the treatment of
`patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.
`(1)
`
`----USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS-----
`Pregnancy: based on animal data, may cause fetal
`harm. (8.1)
`
`8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS
`8.1 Pregnancy
`Pregnancy Category C
`
`There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in
`pregnant women. In animals, adverse effects on
`offspring survival, growth, sexual maturation, and
`neurobehavioral function were observed when
`dimethyl fumarate (DMF) was administered during
`pregnancy and lactation at clinical relevant doses.
`TECFIDERA should be used during pregnancy only
`if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to
`the fetus.
`
`In rats administered DMF orally (25, 100, 250
`mg/kg/day) throughout organogenesis, embryofetal
`toxicity (reduced fetal body weight and delayed
`ossification) were observed at the highest dose
`tested. This dose also produced evidence of
`maternal toxicity (reduced body weight). Plasma
`exposure (AUC) for monomethyl fumarate (MMF),
`the major circulating metabolite, at the no-effect
`dose is approximately three times that in humans at
`the recommended human dose (RHD) of 480
`mg/day. In rabbits administered DMF orally (25, 75,
`and 150 mg/kg/day) throughout organogenesis,
`embryolethality and decreased maternal body
`weight were observed at the highest dose tested.
`The plasma AUC for MMF at the no-effect dose is
`approximately 5 times that in humans at the RHD.
`
`Oral administration of DMF (25, 100, and 250
`mg/kg/day) to rats throughout organogenesis and
`lactation resulted in increased lethality, persistent
`reductions in body weight, delayed sexual
`maturation (male and female pups), and reduced
`testicular weight in offspring at the highest dose
`tested. Neurobehavioral impairment was observed at
`all doses. A no-effect dose for developmental
`
`2
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3279692
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`8.3 Nursing Mothers
`
`It is not known whether this drug is excreted in
`human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in
`human milk, caution should be exercised when
`TRADENAME is administered to a nursing woman.
`
`12 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`
`toxicity was not identified. The lowest dose tested
`was associated with plasma AUC for MMF lower
`than that in humans at the RHD.
`
`Pregnancy Registry
`
`[No comment on PR wording; defer to clinical
`team.]
`
`This section should be omitted.
`
`8.3 Nursing Mothers
`
`It is not known whether this drug is excreted in
`human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in
`human milk, caution should be exercised when
`TECFIDERA is administered to a nursing woman.
`8.4 Pediatric Use
`
`Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients not
`been established.
`
`12.1 Mechanism of Action
`
`The mechanism by which dimethyl fumarate (DMF)
`exerts its therapeutic effect in multiple sclerosis is
`unknown. DMF and the metabolite, monomethyl
`fumarate (MMF), have been shown to activate the
`Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2)
`pathway in vitro and in vivo in animals and humans.
`The Nrf2 pathway is involved in the cellular
`response to oxidative stress. MMF has been
`identified as a nicotinic acid receptor agonist in
`vitro.
`
`13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3279692
`
`3
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of
`Fertility
`
`Carcinogenesis
`Carcinogenicity studies of dimethyl fumarate
`(DMF) were conducted in mouse and rat. In mouse,
`oral administration of DMF (25, 75, 200 and 400
`mg/kg/day) for up to two years resulted in an
`increase in nonglandular stomach (forestomach) and
`kidney tumors: squamous cell carcinomas and
`papillomas of the forestomach in males and females
`at 200 and 400 mg/kg/day; leiomyosarcomas of the
`forestomach at 400 mg/kg/day in males and
`females; renal tubular adenomas and carcinoma at
`200 and 400 mg/kg/day in males; and renal tubule
`adenomas at 400 mg/kg/day in females. Plasma
`MMF exposure (AUC) at the highest dose not
`associated with tumors in mouse (75 mg/kg/day)
`was similar to that in humans at the recommended
`human dose (RHD) of 480 mg/day.
`
`In rat, oral administration of DMF (25, 50, 100, and
`150 mg/kg/day) for up to two years resulted in
`increases in squamous cell carcinomas and
`papillomas of the forestomach at all doses tested in
`males and females, and in testicular interstitial
`(Leydig) cell adenomas at 100 and 150 mg/kg/day.
`Plasma MMF AUC at the lowest dose tested was
`lower than that in humans at the RHD.
`
`Mutagenesis
`Dimethyl fumarate and monomethyl fumarate
`(MMF) were not mutagenic in the in vitro bacterial
`reverse mutation (Ames) assay. DMF and MMF
`were clastogenic in the in vitro chromosomal
`aberration assay in human peripheral blood
`lymphocytes in the absence of metabolic activation.
`DMF was not clastogenic in the in vivo
`micronucleus assay in rat.
`
`Impairment of Fertility
`In male rat, oral administration of DMF (75, 250,
`and 375 mg/kg/day) prior to and throughout the
`mating period had no effect on fertility; however,
`increases in non-motile sperm were observed at the
`mid and high doses. The no-effect dose for adverse
`effects on sperm is similar to the recommended
`human dose (RHD) of 480 mg/day on a body
`surface area (mg/m2) basis.
`
`In female rat, oral administration of DMF (20, 100,
`and 250 mg/kg/day) prior to and during mating and
`continuing to gestation day 7 caused disruption of
`the estrus cycle and increases in embryolethality at
`the highest dose tested. The highest dose not
`associated with adverse effects (100 mg/kg/day) is
`
`4
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3279692
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`twice the RHD on a mg/m2 basis.
`
`Testicular toxicity (germinal epithelial
`degeneration, atrophy, hypospermia, and/or
`hyperplasia) was observed at clinically relevant
`doses in mouse, rat, and dog in subchronic and
`chronic oral toxicity studies of DMF, and in a
`chronic oral toxicity study of fumaric acid esters
`(including DMF) in rat.
`13.2 Animal Toxicology and/or Pharmacology
`
`Kidney toxicity was observed after repeated oral
`administration of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in
`mouse, rat, dog, and monkey. Renal tubule epithelia
`regeneration, suggestive of tubule epithelial injury,
`was observed in all species. Renal tubular
`hyperplasia was observed in rats with dosing for up
`to two years. Cortical atrophy and interstitial
`fibrosis were observed in dog and monkey at doses
`above 5 mg/kg/day. In monkey, the highest dose
`tested (75 mg/kg/day) was associated with single
`cell necrosis and multifocal and diffuse interstitial
`fibrosis, indicating irreversible loss of renal tissue
`and function. In dog and monkey, the 5-mg/kg/day
`dose was associated with plasma MMF exposures
`less than or similar to that in humans at the
`recommended human dose (RHD).
`
` dose-related increase in incidence and severity of
`retinal degeneration was observed in mouse
`following oral administration of DMF for up to two
`years at doses above 75 mg/kg/day, a dose
`associated with plasma MMF exposure (AUC)
`similar to that in humans at the RHD.
`
`
` A
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3279692
`
`5
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`LOIS M FREED
`03/20/2013
`
`Reference ID: 3279692
`
`

`

`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template for TECFIDERA (dimethyl fumarate)
`
`PMR # 2014-1
`
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`PMR/PMC Description: Deferred pediatric trial under PREA: A randomized, controlled, parallel
`group superiority trial in pediatric patients ages 10 through 17 years to
`evaluate the pharmacokinetics of dimethyl fumarate, and the safety and
`efficacy of dimethyl fumarate compared to an appropriate control for
`the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.
`
` 11/30/2016
` 10/31/2019
` 02/28/2020
` MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final protocol Submission Date:
`
`Study/Clinical trial Completion Date:
`
`Final Report Submission Date:
`
`Other:
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`This is a PREA requirement. A waiver has been given for children under from birth to nine
`years of age because necessary studies are impossible or highly impracticable due to the small
`number of patients less than 10 years old with multiple sclerosis. A deferral has been given for
`those ages 10 up to 17; it is appropriate for a PMR because the drug is about to be approved and
`the pediatric study has not been completed.
`
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 3/7/2013
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3272669
`
`

`

`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`The goal of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of dimethyl fumarate
`in pediatric patients ages 10 to up to 17 compared to an appropriate control for treatment of
`relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.
`
`
`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 3/7/2013
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3272669
`
`

`

`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`Deferred pediatric trial under PREA: A randomized, controlled, parallel group superiority
`trial in pediatric patients ages 10 through 17 years to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of
`dimethyl fumarate, and the safety and efficacy of dimethyl fumarate compared to an
`appropriate control for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.
`
`
`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`PREA pediatric clinical trial
`
`
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`
`
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
`
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 3/7/2013
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3272669
`
`

`

`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`
`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
`
`This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine
`the safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug quality.
`
`
`
`_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 3/7/2013
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3272669
`
`

`

`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template for TECFIDERA (dimethyl fumarate)
`PMR # 2014-2
`
` 6/30/12
` 8/30/13
` 10/30/13
` MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`PMR/PMC Description: Receptor binding study for abuse potential assessment
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final protocol Submission Date:
`
`Study/Clinical trial Completion Date:
`
`Final Report Submission Date:
`
`Other:
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`The clinical data collected so far does not indicate major problems with respect to abuse
`potential.
`
`
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`The NDA for dimethyl fumarate does not contain all of the information necessary for a
`complete evaluation of its abuse potential. The goal of this study is to provide
`information about the abuse potential of dimethyl fumarate. Although activation of the
`nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NFE2L2 or Nrf2) transcriptional pathway is
`not a pharmacological mechanism of action traditionally recognized to be associated with
`known drugs of abuse, comprehensive receptor binding studies with dimethyl fumarate
`would establish whether activity at receptor sites associated with abused drugs exists.
`
`
`Tecfidera PMR/PMC Development Template Last Updated 2/7/13
`
`
`
` Page 1 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3272669
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`
`
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`A comprehensive in vitro receptor binding study with dimethyl fumarate and with its
`metabolite monomethyl fumarate. This includes characterizing the affinity of dimethyl
`fumarate and monomethyl fumarate on dopamine, serotonin, GABA (gamma-amino-
`butyric-acid), opioid, NMDA, monoamine, sodium channel, calcium channel, and
`cannabinoid receptor sites, as well as the interaction of dimethyl fumarate and of
`monomethyl fumarate with nitric oxide synthase.
`
`
`
`
`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
`
`Tecfidera PMR/PMC Development Template Last Updated 2/7/13
`
`
`
` Page 2 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3272669
`
`

`

`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`
`
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
`
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
`This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine the
`safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug quality.
`
`_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`Tecfidera PMR/PMC Development Template Last Updated 2/7/13
`
`
`
` Page 3 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3272669
`
`

`

`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template for Tecfidera (dimethyl fumarate)
` PMR # 2014-3
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`PMR/PMC Description: A nonclinical self-administration study to assess abuse potential using
`dimethyl fumarate in animals trained to discriminate the known drug of
`abuse from saline.
`
` 10/30/2013
` 02/28/2014
` 03/30/2014
` MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final protocol Submission Date:
`
`Study/Clinical trial Completion Date:
`
`Final Report Submission Date:
`
`Other:
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`The clinical data collected so far does not indicate major problems with respect to abuse
`potential.
`
`
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`The NDA for dimethyl fumarate does not contain all of the information necessary for a
`complete evaluation of its abuse potential. The goal of this study is to provide
`information about the abuse potential of dimethyl fumarate. The ability of dimethyl
`fumarate to produce self-administration is unknown. Among preclinical behavioral
`models used to evaluate the abuse potential of a drug, self-administration is often cited as
`the standard preclinical abuse potential assessment because of its face validity and
`predictive validity. Data from self-administration studies will provide information about
`the likelihood that dimethyl fumarate will function as a reinforcer and be abused.
`
`
`Tecfidera PMR/PMC Development Template Last Updated 3/7/13
`
` Page 1 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3272669
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`
`
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`A nonclinical self-administration study to assess abuse potential using dimethyl fumarate
`in animals trained to discriminate the known drug of abuse from saline. The animals
`chosen must demonstrate similar metabolism of dimethyl fumarate and monomethyl
`fumarate as observed in humans.
`
`
`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
`
`Tecfidera PMR/PMC Development Template Last Updated 3/7/13
`
` Page 2 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3272669
`
`

`

`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`
`
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
`
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
`This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine the
`safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug quality.
`
`_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`Tecfidera PMR/PMC Development Template Last Updated 3/7/13
`
` Page 3 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3272669
`
`

`

`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template for TECFIDERA (dimethyl fumarate)
`PMR # 2014-4
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`PMR/PMC Description: A nonclinical discrimination study to assess abuse potential using
`dimethyl fumarate in animals trained to discriminate the known drug of
`abuse from saline.
`
`
` 3/30/2014
` 7/30/2014
` 8/30/2014
` MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final protocol Submission Date:
`
`Study/Clinical trial Completion Date:
`
`Final Report Submission Date:
`
`Other:
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`The clinical data collected so far does not indicate major problems with respect to abuse
`potential.
`
`
`
`
`
`Tecfidera PMR/PMC Development Template Last Updated 3/7/2013
`
` Page 1 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3272669
`
`

`

`NDA 204063
`Tecfidera
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`The NDA for dimethyl fumarate does not contain all of the information necessary for a
`complete evaluation of its abuse potential. The goal of this study is to provide
`information about the abuse potential of dimethyl fumarate. The similarity of dimethyl
`fumarate to other drugs of abuse as evaluated in the drug discrimination study is
`unknown. Among preclinical behavioral models used to evaluate the abuse potential of a
`drug, the discrimination study is often cited as one of the most important standard
`preclinical abuse potential evaluations because of its face validity and predictive validity.
`Data from discrimination studies will provide information about the similarity of
`dimethyl fumarate to other drugs of abuse and serve as a predictor of its potential for
`abuse
`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficien

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket