throbber

`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 203858/S-013, S-016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`
`
` Silver Spring MD 20993
`
`
` SUPPLEMENT APPROVAL
` REMS ASSESSMENT PLAN REVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Aegerion Pharmaceuticals
`
` Attention: Sheryl Raukete
` Global Regulatory Lead, Regulatory Affairs
`
` One Main Street, 8th Floor
`
`
` Cambridge, MA 02142
`
`
`Dear Ms. Raukete:
`
`
`
`Please refer to your Supplemental New Drug Applications (sNDAs) dated and received
`
`
`
`
`
`
`October 5, 2015 (S-013) and July 7, 2016 (S-016), and your amendments, submitted under
`
`
`
`
`
`section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) for Juxtapid (lomitapide)
`
`
`
`
`capsules, 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, and 60 mg.
`
`
`Supplement -013, submitted as a Prior Approval supplemental new drug application, proposes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`modifications of the REMS to expand the number of certified pharmacies.
`
`
`
`Supplement -016, submitted as a Prior Approval supplemental new drug application, was
`
`
`
`
`submitted in response to and proposes modifications described in our Safety Labeling Change
`
`
`
`
`Notification/REMS Modification Notification letter dated March 11, 2016. The labeling changes
`
`
`to comply with this notification were approved in supplement-015 on May 23, 2016.
`
`
`
`We also refer to our REMS Assessment Acknowledgement letter dated June 17, 2016.
`
`
`RISK EVALUATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGY REQUIREMENTS
`
`
`The REMS for Juxtapid (lomitapide) was originally approved on December 21, 2012, and the
`
`
`
`
`
`most recent modification was approved on August 13, 2013. The REMS consists of elements to
`
`
`
`assure safe use, an implementation system, and a timetable for submission of assessments of the
`
`
`
`REMS. In order to ensure that the benefits of Juxtapid (lomitapide) outweigh its risks, we
`
`
`
`
`determined that you were required to modify the REMS for Juxtpaid. The required
`
`
`modifications were outlined in our Safety Labeling Change Notification/REMS Modification
`
`
`
`
`Notification letter issued on March 11, 2016, and included modifications to the REMS
`
`
`
`
`document, changes to the existing REMS materials, and the following new REMS materials:
`
`
`Patient Guide and Patient-Prescriber Acknowledgement Form.
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4036116
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` NDA 203858/S-013, S-016
`
` Page 2
`
`
`
` Your proposed modified REMS, submitted on October 5, 2015 (S-013), and July 7, 2016
`
`
`
` (S-016), as amended and appended to this letter, is approved.
`
`
`
`You must implement the modifications to the REMS program within 60 calendar days from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`date of this letter. Prescribers and pharmacies have 180 calendar days from the date of this letter
`
`to complete the recertification process.
`
`The timetable for submission of assessments of the REMS remains the same as that approved on
`
`December 21, 2012.
`
`
`
`In order to align with the modified REMS, the REMS assessment plan is being revised. The
`
`revised REMS assessment plan must include, but is not limited to, the following:
`
`
`
`1. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior (KAB) Surveys of Prescribers
`
`
`
`
`A KAB Survey will be conducted with a random sample of certified prescribers to assess
`
`their awareness and understanding of the indication for use, the risk of hepatotoxicity,
`
`
`including appropriate evaluation, monitoring and counseling to minimize this risk, as
`
`
`
`
`
`described in the Prescribing Information (PI), Fact Sheet, and the Prescriber Training
`
`Module. The survey will also assess prescribers’ awareness of the JUXTAPID REMS
`Program materials and knowledge of requirements of the JUXTAPID REMS Program.
`
`
`
`In the event of substantive changes to the methodology and protocol for the KAB Survey,
`
`
`or the survey instrument, these documents will be provided to the FDA at least 90 days
`
`before the survey is administered.
`
`
`The protocol will include:
`
`
`a.
`
`
`
`
`the target sample size and precision estimates associated with that sample size
`
`
`
`b. a description of the methodology for recruitment and selection of the prescriber
`
`
`sample
`
`c.
`
`
`
`
`the specific criteria that will be used to select participants in the survey
`
`
`
`
`d. a description of how and when the surveys will be administered
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4036116
`
`
`
`e. an explanation of the design features and controls that will be included to
`
`
`minimize bias and compensate for limitations in the methodology
`
`
`f. a copy of the survey questionnaire
`
`
`
`
`
`The KAB assessment will be included in your next assessment report and will be
`
`
`repeated annually thereafter. Survey results will be provided in each annual REMS
`
`Assessment Report.
`
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 203858/S-013, S-016
`
` Page 3
`
`
`
`
`
` 2. Survey to Evaluate Patient Knowledge
`
`
`
`
`A survey to evaluate the understanding of patients on their understanding of the REMS
`
`
`
`goal about the risk of hepatotoxicity and the need for baseline and periodic monitoring
`
`
`
`
`will be performed and the data included in the second assessment report following the
`
`
`
`approval of the modification to the JUXTAPID REMS Program, due to be submitted on
`
`
`
`or before 12/21/2018. The protocol or survey instrument will be provided to the FDA at
`
`least 90 days before the survey is implemented.
`
`3. Additional REMS Metrics
`
`
`
`
`The REMS Assessment will also include evaluation of the following program metrics:
`
`
`
`
`a. Communications with certified prescribers and certified pharmacies:
`
`
`
`
`i. The date of mailing and number of recipients of the REMS Letter for
`
`
`Healthcare Providers and REMS Letter for Pharmacists
`
`
`
`
`ii. The number of mailings returned; and
`
`
`
`iii. A copy of all documents included in each mailing.
`
`
`
`iv. Summary of issues and complaints received by JUXTAPID REMS
`
`
`Program Call Center; summary of resolution of the issues and complaints.
`
`
`
`v. Summary of the reasons (and numbers per reason) for calls into the
`
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Call Center.
`
`
`
`b. Prescriber Certification:
`
`
`
`
`
`i. The number of Healthcare Prescribers certified (and the number of
`
`
`prescribers that were certified at the time of a requirement for
`
`
`re-certification was instituted) in the JUXTAPID REMS Program (during
`
`
`the reporting period and cumulatively) and stratified by prescriber degree,
`
`
`practice setting (i.e., type of practice and geographic location) including a
`
`full breakdown of prescribing specialties contained in the “other”
`
`category.
`
`ii. Volume of prescriptions for each prescriber and each specialty, including
`
`
`a full breakdown of prescribing specialties contained in the “other”
`
`category.
`
`iii. Specialties of the “high volume” prescribers, i.e., those who write more
`
`
`than 4 prescriptions in an assessment period and cumulatively, including a
`
`full breakdown of prescribing specialties contained in the “other”
`
`category.
`
`iv. A summary of the method prescribers used to enroll (fax, email) (during
`
`
`the reporting period and cumulatively).
`
`v. Number of healthcare providers that had their certification revoked during
`
`
`
`the reporting period and cumulatively and the reason for the revocation.
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4036116
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 203858/S-013, S-016
`
` Page 4
`
`
`
`c.
`
`
`d.
`
`
`e.
`
`
`Reference ID: 4036116
`
`
`
` Wholesaler/Distributor Authorization:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`i. The number of wholesalers/distributors that were authorized in the REMS
`
`
`
`
`program (during the reporting period and cumulatively).
`
`
`ii. Number of wholesalers/distributors that had their authorization revoked
`
`
`
`during the reporting period and cumulatively and the reason for the
`
`revocation.
`
`
`
`iii. The number of JUXTAPID orders shipped to pharmacies during the
`
`
`
`reporting period and cumulatively, including number of bottles, bottle size
`
`and dosage strength.
`
`iv. Number of JUXTAPID orders shipped to non-certified pharmacies.
`
`
`
`
`Pharmacy Enrollment:
`
`
`
`
`
`i. The number of pharmacies that were certified (and the number of
`
`
`pharmacies that were certified at the time of a requirement for
`
`
`re-certification was instituted that recertified) in the REMS program
`
`(during the reporting period and cumulatively).
`
`ii. Number of pharmacies that had their certification revoked during the
`
`
`reporting period and cumulatively and the reason for the revocation.
`
`
`
`Pharmacy Metrics:
`
`
`
`i. The number of new prescriptions received, and the number that were not
`
`
`
`accompanied by the JUXTAPID REMS Program Prescription
`
`Authorization Form.
`
`
`ii. The number of prescriptions dispensed for JUXTAPID, including quantity
`
`
`
`of capsules (mean, minimum, maximum) and dosage strength during the
`reporting period and cumulatively, overall and subset by compliance with
`
`
`the JUXTAPID REMS Program requirements (e.g., received from
`
`
`
`JUXTAPID certified vs. non-certified healthcare providers, number of
`
`initial prescriptions dispensed without a signed attestation on the
`
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Prescription Authorization Form).
`
`
`Dispensing details are to be obtained from the pharmacies.
`
`
`
`
`
`iii. The number of instances certified pharmacies dispensed JUXTAPID using
`
`
`
`a prescription that was not accompanied by a JUXTAPID REMS Program
`
`
`Patient-Prescriber Acknowledgement Form.
`iv. Information on the number of prescribers who have submitted an altered
`
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Prescription Authorization Form (and what
`
`alterations were made).
`v. Number of instances certified pharmacies dispensed JUXTAPID in
`
`
`response to a prescription received on an altered JUXTAPID REMS
`
`Program Prescription Authorization Form.
`
`
`vi. The number and demographics (e.g., including gender, age, geographic
`
`
`
`location) of unique patients who received JUXTAPID during the reporting
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 203858/S-013, S-016
`
` Page 5
`
`
`
`
`
` period and annually. The number is to be calculated by reconciling orders
`
` dispensed to unique patients.
`
` vii. Duration of therapy for patients (mean, median, range).
`
` viii. The number of prescriptions pending and canceled, as well as the reason
`
`
` for prescriptions pending and canceled.
`
`
` ix. Specific criterion used to classify a prescription as canceled.
`
`
`
` x. Report of number, length, and reasons for shipment delays to patients and
`
`
`
` whether or not these reasons were related to the REMS, and any additional
`
`
`
` information from insurance payers as to what they are stating as the reason
`
` for delay/non-payment.
`
` xi. Percentage of fill delays that involve new prescriptions versus refills.
`
`xii. Detailed description of root cause of noncompliance with REMS program-
`
`
`
` required dispensing and any corrective and/or preventive actions taken to
` address noncompliance during the reporting period and cumulatively.
`
`
`
`
` f. With regard to the risk of hepatotoxicity associated with JUXTAPID, provide an
`
`
`
`
`
` analysis of the post-marketing cases of specific hepatic adverse events reported in
` association with JUXTAPID to Aegerion (during the reporting period and
`
`
`
` cumulatively), including outcome.
`
`
`
` g. Specification of measures that would be taken to increase awareness if prescriber
`
`
`
`
`
`
` surveys indicate that prescriber awareness of the risks associated to JUXTAPID is
`
` not adequate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4. The requirements for assessments of an approved REMS under section 505-1(g)(3)
`
`
`include with respect to each goal included in the strategy, an assessment of the extent to
`
`
`which the approved strategy, including each element of the strategy, is meeting the goal
`
`
`
`or whether one or more such goals or such elements should be modified.
`
`
`
`
`
`We remind you that in addition to the REMS assessments submitted according to the timetable in
`
`
`
`the approved REMS, you must include an adequate rationale to support a proposed REMS
`
`modification for the addition, modification, or removal of any of goal or element of the REMS,
`
`
`as described in section 505-1(g)(4) of the FDCA.
`
`
`
`We also remind you that you must submit a REMS assessment when you submit a supplemental
`
`
`application for a new indication for use as described in section 505-1(g)(2)(A) of the FDCA.
`
`This assessment should include:
`
`
`
`
`a) An evaluation of how the benefit-risk profile will or will not change with the new
`
`
`
`indication;
`
`b) A determination of the implications of a change in the benefit-risk profile for the current
`
`
`
`REMS;
`
`c) If the new indication for use introduces unexpected risks: A description of those risks
`
`
`
`
`and an evaluation of whether those risks can be appropriately managed with the currently
`
`approved REMS.
`
`
`Reference ID: 4036116
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 203858/S-013, S-016
`
` Page 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` d) If a REMS assessment was submitted in the 18 months prior to submission of the
`
`
`
`
` supplemental application for a new indication for use: A statement about whether the
` REMS was meeting its goals at the time of that the last assessment and if any
`
`
`
`
`modifications of the REMS have been proposed since that assessment.
`
` e) If a REMS assessment has not been submitted in the 18 months prior to submission of the
`
`
`
` supplemental application for a new indication for use: Provision of as many of the
`
`
` currently listed assessment plan items as is feasible.
`
`f) If you propose a REMS modification based on a change in the benefit-risk profile or
`
`
` because of the new indication of use, submit an adequate rationale to support the
`
` modification, including: Provision of the reason(s) why the proposed REMS
`
` modification is necessary, the potential effect on the serious risk(s) for which the REMS
`
`
`
` was required, on patient access to the drug, and/or on the burden on the health care
`delivery system; and other appropriate evidence or data to support the proposed change.
`Additionally, include any changes to the assessment plan necessary to assess the
`proposed modified REMS. If you are not proposing REMS modifications, provide a
`
`
`rationale for why the REMS does not need to be modified.
`
`
`
`
`
`If the assessment instruments and methodology for your REMS assessments are not included in
`
`
`the REMS supporting document, or if you propose changes to the submitted assessment
`
`
`instruments or methodology, you should update the REMS supporting document to include
`
`specific assessment instrument and methodology information at least 90 days before the
`
`
`assessments will be conducted. Updates to the REMS supporting document may be included in a
`
`
`new document that references previous REMS supporting document submission(s) for
`
`unchanged portions. Alternatively, updates may be made by modifying the complete previous
`
`
`
`REMS supporting document, with all changes marked and highlighted. Prominently identify the
`
`submission containing the assessment instruments and methodology with the following wording
`
`
`in bold capital letters at the top of the first page of the submission:
`
`
`
`NDA 203858 REMS CORRESPONDENCE
`
`
`
`(insert concise description of content in bold capital letters, e.g.,
`
`
`UPDATE TO REMS SUPPORTING DOCUMENT - ASSESSMENT
`
`
`METHODOLOGY)
`
`
`
`
`An authorized generic drug under this NDA must have an approved REMS prior to marketing.
`Should you decide to market, sell, or distribute an authorized generic drug under this NDA,
`
`
`contact us to discuss what will be required in the authorized generic drug REMS submission.
`
`
`We remind you that section 505-1(f)(8) of FDCA prohibits holders of an approved covered
`
`
`application with elements to assure safe use from using any element to block or delay approval
`
`
`
`of an application under section 505(b)(2) or (j). A violation of this provision in 505-1(f) could
`result in enforcement action.
`
`
`Prominently identify any submission containing the REMS assessments or proposed
`
`modifications of the REMS with the following wording in bold capital letters at the top of the
`
`first page of the submission as appropriate:
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4036116
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 203858/S-013, S-016
`
` Page 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 203858 REMS ASSESSMENT
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 203858/S-000
`
`
`CHANGES BEING EFFECTED IN 30 DAYS
`
`
`PROPOSED MINOR REMS MODIFICATION
`
`
`
`
`or
`
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 203858/S-000
`
`
`PRIOR APPROVAL SUPPLEMENT
`
`
`PROPOSED MAJOR REMS MODIFICATION
`
`
`
`or
`
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 203858/S-000
`
`PRIOR APPROVAL SUPPLEMENT
`
`
`
`PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATIONS DUE TO SAFETY LABEL CHANGES
`
`SUBMITTED IN SUPPLEMENT XXX
`
`
`
`or
`
`
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT (NEW INDICATION FOR USE) FOR NDA 203858/S-000
`
`
`REMS ASSESSMENT
`
`PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATION (if included)
`
`
`REMS REVISIONS FOR NDA 203858
`
`
`
`Should you choose to submit a REMS revision, prominently identify the submission containing
`
`the REMS revisions with the following wording in bold capital letters at the top of the first page
`
`of the submission:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To facilitate review of your submission, we request that you submit your proposed modified
`
`REMS and other REMS-related materials in Microsoft Word format. If certain documents, such
`
`
`as enrollment forms, are only in PDF format, they may be submitted as such, but the preference
`
`
`
`
`
`is to include as many as possible in Word format.
`
`
`
`If you do not submit electronically, please send 5 copies of REMS-related submissions.
`
`
`REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
`
`
`
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA
`
`
`(21 CFR 314.80 and 314.81).
`
`
`Reference ID: 4036116
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 203858/S-013, S-016
`
` Page 8
`
`
`
`
` If you have any questions, call Kati Johnson, Senior Regulatory Project Manager, at
` (301) 796-1234.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`
`Jennifer Rodriguez Pippins, M.D., M.P.H.
`
`
`Deputy Director for Safety
`
`Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products
`
`
`Office of Drug Evaluation II
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`
`ENCLOSURES:
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Document
`
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Prescriber Enrollment Form
`
`
`
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Prescriber Training Module and Knowledge Assessment
`
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Fact Sheet
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Patient Guide
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Patient-Prescriber Acknowledgement Form
`
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Prescription Authorization Form
`
`
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Letter for Healthcare Providers
`
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Website Landing Page
`
`
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Pharmacy Training Module and Knowledge Assessment
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Program Pharmacy Enrollment Form
`
`
`
`JUXTAPID REMS Letter for Pharmacists
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4036116
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`JENNIFER R PIPPINS
`01/03/2017
`
`Reference ID: 4036116
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket