throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`203567Orig1s000
`
`SUMMARY REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`

`

`DiVision Deputy Director Review
`
`Summary Review for Regulatory Action
`
`electronic stamp)
`tanka Kukich, IVID
`From
`
`Subject
`Deputy Director Summary Review
`NBA
`203567
`
`Applicant Name
`
`Date of Submission
`
`PDUFA Goal Date
`
`Proprietary Name /
`Established
`S .
`
`Name
`
`Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences/Valeant Pharmaceuticals
`North America LLC
`
`December 20, 2013
`
`June 20, 2014
`
`JUBLIA/Efinaconazole
`
`
`
`Dosa _e Forms / Stren_ h
`Proposed Indication(s)
`
`To a ical solution, 10%
`Treatment of onychomycosis of the toenails due to
`Trichophyton rubrmn or Trichophyton
`mentagrophvtes
`Action/Recommended Action for Approval
`NME:
`
`Material Reviewed/Consulted
`
`0ND Action Packa - e, includin:
`
`Names of disci n line reviewers
`
`OND=0fice ofNew Drugs
`DDMAC=Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising and Communication
`0513: 05:: of Surveillance and Epidemiology
`DMEPA=Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis
`DSI=Division of Scientific Investigations
`DDRE= Division of Drug Risk Evaluation
`DRISK=Division ofRisk Management
`CD'IIPCross—Discipline Team Leader
`
`Page 1 of 7
`
`Reference ID: 3516809
`
`

`

`Division Deputy Director Review
`
`Signatory Authority Review Template
`
`1. Introduction
`
`This is a resubmission in response to the Agency’s original action of May13, 2013 and
`provides for the use of JUBLIA (efinaconazole) topical solution, 10% for the treatment of
`onychomycosis of the toenails due to Trichophyton mentagrophytes or Trichophyton rubrum.
`
`Efinaconazole is a new molecular entity, an azole antifungal agent, for the topical treatment of
`onychomycosis (tinea unguium) of the toenails. It is applied to toenails, the nail folds, nail bed,
`hyponychium, and undersurface of the nail plate once daily for 48 weeks using a flow-through
`brush applicator.
`
`IND for IDP-108 (efinaconazole) was submitted by Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences on June 14,
`2007 and NDA on July 26, 2012. Initially, this application received a Complete Response
`action on May 13, 2013 because of the lack of sufficient chemistry, manufacturing, and
`controls (CMC) information. The CMC deficiencies included, but were not limited to, brush-
`cap assembly, integrity of the container /closure system, inadequate specification for the drug
`product, and inadequate stability data to assure the expiration period.
`
`The applicant has replaced the original container with a similar container closure system that
`does not leak under accelerated or long-term conditions when stored in either horizontal or
`vertical position. The formulation, manufacturing process, specifications and analytical
`methods for the drug substance, excipients, and the final product are the same as described in
`the original NDA. The container closure and the location of the finished product
`manufacturing have been changed. Additionally, a more rigorous in-process control for the
`packaging operation has been added.
`
`JUBLIA has been approved in Canada, however, has not been marketed at the time of
`resubmission of the NDA.
`
`This review will discuss issues under sections 3, 10, 11, 12, and 13 that are related to
`information provided in resubmission of this NDA. For the complete review of other sections
`please refer to the Summary Review for Regulator Action, April 24, 2013.
`
`2. Background
`
`Onychomycosis is a chronic fungal infection of nail plate due to dermatophytes,
`nondermatophytes and yeasts. Common dermatophytes causing onychomycosis (tinea
`unguium) are Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton rubrum, and Epidermophyton
`floccosum. The prevalence rate of onychomycosis is 2% to 14%. It is more prevalent in adults
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`Reference ID: 3516809
`
`

`

`Division Deputy Director Review
`
`and is less common in children (prevalence rate 0.2% to 2.6%). Often patients with a chronic
`tinea pedis and tinea manuum also have infection of the nails. The infection usually starts at
`the distal edge of the nail, presented as an opaque White, then yellow to brown patch at the side
`and distal tip of the nail. Some of the poor prognostic factors include, but are not limited to,
`area of nail involvement >50%, presence of dermatophytoma, matrix involvement, and
`immunosuppression. The criteria for diagnosis of onychomycosis include clinical evaluation,
`potassium hydroxide (KOH) microscopic evaluation, and flmgal culture.
`
`Efinaconazole is an azole antifimgal agent that inhibits fimgal lanosterol 14-01 demethylase
`involved in ergosterol biosynthesis. Loss of ergosterol in the flmgi cell wall may be
`responsible for the fimgistatic and flmgicidal activity. Efmaconazole has been shown to be
`active against Trichophyton mentagrophvtes and Trichophyton rubrum, both, invitro and in the
`clinical setting.
`
`Regulatory issues regarding the development program for this product were discussed with the
`applicant at the End-of—Phase 2 meeting on August 4, 2009 and Pre-NDA meeting on April 11,
`2012. The Type A meeting was held on July 17, 2013 to discuss the Complete Response
`Letter. In addition, there were a number of interactions with the applicant during the
`development of efmaconazole lmder the IND and during the review process of the submitted
`NDA. These interactions included teleconferences, correspondences, and advice letters.
`
`3. CMCIDevice
`
`Each gram of JUBLIA contains 100 mg of efmaconazole in a clear, colorless to pale yellow
`solution. It is manufactured by
`(”N0
`
`. The drug substance is insoluble in water. The alcohol content is
`approximately (m4) w/w in the product.
`
`In the Complete Response letter, the following product quality issues were identified: a)
`inadequate manufacturing process and control information of the filling/capping;
`M“)
`operation, b) inadequate specification for the drug product, c) inadequate integrity of the
`container closure system, and d) inadequate stability data to assure the expiration dating
`period.
`
`In this submission, the applicant proposed a new container closure system of similar design
`that includes 10 mL HDPE bottle with a flow-through brush applicator. The container closure,
`packaging operations, and the manufacturing facility are new. Manufacturing process
`included all necessary controls to assure drug product quality, 24 months stability data on three
`representative batches in the new container were submitted, and information on Kaken’s
`cGMP manufacturing facility was also included.
`
`Drug product specification and analytical methods for the drug substance, excipients, and the
`formulation were not changed from the original submission.
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`Reference ID: 3516809
`
`

`

`Division Deputy Director Review
`
`Based on Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls assessment, 1) the DMF has been reviewed
`and found adequate to support manufacturing process for efinaconazole, 2) the drug product
`specification and analytical methods were found acceptable for assuring the identity, strength,
`purity, and quality of drug product, 3) the new container closure system and control of filling
`operation were adequately addressed previous concerns, 4) results of 24-month stability
`studies supported 36-month expiration period, 5) the cGMP compliance of facilities (including
`the new drug product manufacturer proposed in the resubmission) has been deemed acceptable
`by the Office of Compliance.
`
`The new product packing configuration appears sufficiently similar regarding application
`technique and amount of product delivered to the one used in clinical trials. Therefore, the new
`container closure presentation does not change safety and efficacy conclusion reached in the
`clinical trials where previous packaging was used.
`
`Efinaconazole formulation is flammable due to high alcohol content.
`
`4. Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology
`
`Refer to the previous Summary Review for Regulatory Action of April 24, 2013
`
`5. Clinical Pharmacology/Biopharmaceutics
`
`Refer to the previous Summary Review for Regulatory Action of April 24, 2013
`
`6. Clinical Microbiology
`
`Refer to the previous Summary Review for Regulatory Action of April 24, 2013
`
`7. Clinical/Statistical-Efficacy
`
`No additional clinical trials were conducted since Complete Response Action was issued for
`this application.
`
`Refer to the previous Summary Review for Regulatory Action of April 24, 2013
`
`8. Safety
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`Reference ID: 3516809
`
`

`

`Division Deputy Director Review
`
`There is no new safety information submitted in this application. Efinaconazole was approved
`in Canada on October 2, 2013, however, has not been launched there at the time of the NDA
`resubmission.
`
`Refer to the previous Summary Review for Regulatory Action of April 24, 2013
`
`9. Advisory Committee Meeting
`
`Refer to the previous Summary Review for Regulatory Action of April 24, 2013
`
`
`10.
`
`Pediatrics
`
`Safety and efficacy of JUBLIA in pediatric subjects under age 18 have not been studied.
`
`The applicant has requested a partial waiver to study pediatric age group <12 years of age,
`under the Pediatric Research Equity Act, codified in 21 CFR 314.55. This request for partial
`waiver was granted because of low prevalence of onychomycosis in subjects 12 years of age
`and younger based on literature review. Studies in this patient population would be impossible
`or highly impractical because of inability to enroll adequate number of subject in this age
`group within reasonable time period.
`
`The applicant has requested deferral of pediatric studies in pediatric subjects ≥ 12 to 17 years
`of age. The applicant proposed to submit; a) final protocol- September 30, 2014, b) complete
`trial-March 31, 2018, and c) submit the final study report-September 30, 2018. This proposed
`pediatric plan was found to be acceptable and PREA PMR will be issued.
`
`11.
`
`Other Relevant Regulatory Issues
`
`There are no other unresolved relevant regulatory issues.
`
`12.
`
`Labeling
`
`There are no unresolved labeling issues at this time. Labeling discussions were focused on
`indication and the presentation of efficacy results. The primary efficacy endpoint was
`Complete Cure at Week 52, 4 weeks after completion of treatment. Complete Cure was
`defined as 0% clinical involvement of the target toenail (clear toenail) and negative fungal
`culture and negative KOH.
`
`Efficacy results for both pivotal trials are provided in the table below.
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`Reference ID: 3516809
`
`

`

`Division Deputy Director Review
`
`Efficacy Results for P3-01 and P3-02 Trials
`Study P3-01
`Efinaconazole
`N=656
`117 (17.8%)
`173 (26.4%)
`
`Vehicle
`N=214
`7 (3.3%)
`15 (7.0%)
`
`Study P3-02
`Efinaconazole
`Vehicle
`N=580
`N=201
`88 (15.2%)
`11 (5.5%0
`136 (23.4%)
`15 (7.5%)
`
`Complete Curea
`Complete or Almost
`complete Cureb
`34 (16.9%)
`310 (53.4%)
`36 (16.8%)
`363 (55.2%)
`Mycologic Curec
`a. Complete Cure defined as 0% clinical involvement of the target toenail (clear nail), negative KOH, and
`negative fungal culture
`b. Complete or Almost complete Cure defined as area ≤5 of involvement of the target toenail negative
`KOH, and negative fungal culture
`c. Mycologic Cure negative KOH, and negative fungal culture
`
`Information that efinaconazole solution is flammable is included in How Supplied/Storage and
`Handling Section of the labeling, Patient Counseling Information, and Patient Information.
`
`Carton and immediate container labels were found to be acceptable.
`
`The proposed proprietary name, JUBLIA was found to be acceptable by OSE/DMEPA
`recommendation.
`
`13.
`
`Decision/Action/Risk Benefit Assessment
`
`NDA 203567 for JUBLIA (efinaconazole) topical solution 10% is recommended to be
`approved for the treatment of onychomycosis of the toenails due to Trichophyton
`mentagrophytes or Trichophyton rubrum. I am in agreement with the recommendation of the
`review team that this application should be approved.
`
`There is sufficient evidence of safety and efficacy based on adequate and well controlled trials
`demonstrating that JUBLIA, efinaconazole, 10% topical solution was superior to vehicle in
`total clearing of fungal infection of the target nail when applied once daily to the toenails for
`48 weeks using a flow-through brush applicator. Assessment of Complete Cure included
`clinical evaluation (0% involvement of the target toenail), negative fungal culture, and
`negative KOH.
`
`The most frequently reported adverse events were application site reaction and ingrown
`toenails.
`
`There are no risk management activities recommended beyond the routine monitoring and
`reporting of adverse events.
`
`Under Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) (21 U.S.C. 355c), a multicenter, randomized,
`double-blind study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of JUBLIA topical solution
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`Reference ID: 3516809
`
`

`

`Division Deputy Director Review
`
`versus vehicle in pediatric subjects ages 12 to less than 17 years with onychomycosis of the
`toenails will be conducted post-approval because NDA for JUBLIA is ready for approval.
`
`Page 7 of 7
`
`Reference ID: 3516809
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`STANKA KUKICH
`06/02/2014
`
`Reference ID: 3516809
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket