throbber

`
`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`203565Orig1s000
`
`MICROBIOLOGY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Product Quality Microbiology Review
`
`4/24/2013
`
`
`
`NDA: 203565
`
`Drug Product Name
`Proprietary: Injectafer
`Non-proprietary: Iron Carboxymaltose
`
`
`Review Number: 2
`
`
`Dates of Submission(s) Covered by this Review
`Submit
`Received
`Review Request
`1/30/2013
`1/30/2013
`2/28/2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Submission History (for 2nd Reviews or higher)
`Submit Date(s)
`Microbiology Review #
`9/30/2011
`1
`3/26/2013
`1
`
`Assigned to Reviewer
`3/08/2013
`
`
`Review Date(s)
`5/08/2013
`5/08/2013
`
`
`Applicant/Sponsor
`Name: Luitpold Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`Address: P.O. Box 9001, One Luitpold Dr., Shirley, NY 11967
`Representative: Marsh Simon
`Telephone: 610 650 4200
`
`
`Name of Reviewer: Steven P. Donald, M.S.
`
`Conclusion: Recommended for Approval
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3301349
`
`

`

`Product Quality Microbiology Data Sheet
`1.
`TYPE OF SUBMISSION: Resubmission
`
`2.
`
`
`
`
`Microbiology Review #2
`
`
`SUBMISSION PROVIDES FOR: Amendment and complete response
`submission to complete response dated 7/23/2012
`
`MANUFACTURING SITE:
`
`
`
`
`NDA 203565
`
`
`
`
`A.
`
`3.
`
`
`4.
`
`DOSAGE FORM, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION AND
`STRENGTH/POTENCY: Injection, IV, 50 mg Iron/ml in glass vials
`
`METHOD(S) OF STERILIZATION:
`
`
`
`PHARMACOLOGICAL CATEGORY: Treatment for iron deficiency
`
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`SUPPORTING/RELATED DOCUMENTS: N203565r1.doc, dated 5/08/2012;
` and DMF review
`_Dec5_A1.doc, dated 4/24/2013.
`
`B.
`DMF
`
`
`
`C. REMARKS: An alternate manufacturing site,
`
`is proposed. The applicant’s letter of December 5, 2012 indicates a manufacturing site
`change. Section 3.2.P.3 in the subject submission lists only the
` location
`as the manufacturing site for the subject drug product, but at the top of the page it
`states: “In addition to those facilities previously identified within this NDA, the
`following facilities may be used for the indicated services associated with the
`manufacture of Injectafer at the alternate
`. manufacturing facility”.
`The subject submission provides only data for the 15 ml vial containing 750 mg iron.
`References to the
` vial are stated to have been removed from the batch records
`and other configurations of the drug product are not mentioned. It appears that at this
`time, this alternate facility will manufacture only the 750 mg configuration and
`manufacturing at the previously reviewed facility will remain unchanged. The
`Product Quality Microbiology review, dated 5/08/2012, which covered manufacturing
`at the
` facility, recommended the submission for approval. After the
`initial review of the 1/30/2013 submission, an information request was sent to the
`sponsor on 4/2/2013. A response dated 4/12/2013 was provided for review and is
`included herein.
`
`
`
`filename: N203565r2.doc
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3301349
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 17
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 203565
`
`Microbiology Review #2
`
`Executive Summary
`
`I.
`
`Recommendations
`
`A.
`
`Recommendation on Approvability - Recommended for
`Approval
`
`B.
`
`Recommendations on Phase 4 Commitments and/or
`
`Agreements, if Approvable — N/A
`
`II.
`
`Summary of Microbiology Assessments
`
`A.
`
`Brief Description of the Manufacturing Processes that relate to
`Product Quality Microbiology — Injectafer will be
`(we)
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Brief Description of Microbiology Deficiencies —
`No product quality microbiology deficiencies were identified
`based upon the information provided.
`
`Assessment of Risk Due to Microbiology Deficiencies —
`N/A
`
`D.
`
`Contains Potential Precedent Decision(s)— D Yes X No
`
`III.
`
`Administrative
`
`A.
`
`Reviewer's Signature
`
`B.
`
`Endorsement Block
`
`C.
`
`CC Block
`
`N/A
`
`Steven P. Donald, M.S.
`
`Microbiology Reviewer
`
`Stephen Langille, Ph.D.
`Senior Microbiology Reviewer
`
`14 Page(s) has been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`Reference ID: 3301349
`
`Page 3 of 17
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`STEVEN P DONALD
`04/30/2013
`
`STEPHEN E LANGILLE
`04/30/2013
`
`Reference ID: 3301349
`
`

`

`Product Quality Microbiology Review
`
`8 May 2012
`
`
`
`
`
`
`203-565/N-000
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NDA:
`
`Drug Product Name
`Injectafer®
`Proprietary:
`
`Non-proprietary: Ferric Carboxymaltose
`
`1
`
`
`Review Number:
`
`Dates of Submission(s) Covered by this Review
`Submit
`Received
`Review Request
`30 September 2011
`3 October 2011
`17 October 2011
`26 March 2012
`26 March 2012
`N/A
`
`Assigned to Reviewer
`20 October 2011
`N/A
`
`
`
`Submission History (for amendments only): N/A
`
`
`Applicant/Sponsor
`Name:
`
`
`Address:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Representative:
`Telephone:
`
`
`Luitpold Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`P.O. Box 9001
`One Luitpold Dr.
`Shirley, NY 11967
`
`Marsha E. Simon
`610-650-4200
`
`Stephen E. Langille, Ph.D.
`
`Recommended for approval
`
`
`Name of Reviewer:
`
`Conclusion:
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3127645
`
`

`

`NDA 203-565/N-000
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Microbiology Review # 1
`
`
`Product Quality Microbiology Data Sheet
`1.
`TYPE OF SUBMISSION:
`
`Original NDA
`
`2.
`
`
`
`SUBMISSION PROVIDES FOR:
`
`
`
`
`
` aqueous intravenous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`injection.
`
`MANUFACTURING SITE:
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Luitpold Pharmaceuticals
`
`Inc.
`
` of an
`
`3.
`
`
`4.
`
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`DOSAGE FORM, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION AND
`STRENGTH/POTENCY:
`
`• Sterile liquid
`• 50 mg iron/mL in glass
`vials
`Intravenous injection
`
`•
`
`METHOD(S) OF STERILIZATION:
`
`
`
`PHARMACOLOGICAL CATEGORY: Treatment of iron deficiency
`
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`SUPPORTING/RELATED DOCUMENTS: Not applicable
`
`REMARKS: The application was submitted in eCTD format. An information
`request was conveyed to the applicant via e-mail on 19 March 2012. The
`applicant responded on 26 March 2012.
`
`
`
`filename: N203565r1.doc
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3127645
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 203-565/N—000
`
`Microbiology Review # 1
`
`Executive Summary
`
`I.
`
`Recommendations
`
`A.
`
`Recommendation on Approvability
`NDA 203-565 is recommended for approval from the standpoint of
`product quality microbiology.
`
`B.
`
`Recommendations on Phase 4 Commitments and/or
`
`Agreements, if Approvable -
`Not applicable
`
`H.
`
`Summary of Microbiology Assessments
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Brief Description of the Manufacturing Processes that relate to
`Product Quality Microbiology -
`Injectafer will be
`
`M0
`
`Brief Description of Microbiology Deficiencies —
`Ne deficiencies were identified based upon the information
`provided.
`
`Assessment of Risk Due to Microbiology Deficiencies —
`Not applicable
`
`III.
`
`Administrative
`
`A.
`
`Reviewer's Signature
`
`B.
`
`Endorsement Block
`
`Stephen E. Langille, PhD.
`
`John Metcalfe, Ph.D., Senior Microbiology Reviewer
`
`C.
`
`CC Block
`
`N/A
`
`9 Page(s) has been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`Reference ID: 31 27645
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`STEPHEN E LANGILLE
`05/08/2012
`
`JOHN W METCALFE
`05/08/2012
`I concur.
`
`Reference ID: 3127645
`
`

`

` PRODUCT QUALITY MICROBIOLOGY FILING CHECKLIST
`NDA Number: 203-565
`Applicant: Luitpold Inc.
`Letter Date: 30 September 2011
`Drug Name: Injectafer®
`NDA Type: Standard
`Stamp Date: 3 October 2011
`
`The following are necessary to initiate a review of the NDA application:
`Content Parameter
`Yes No
`
`
`Is the product quality microbiology information described
`in the NDA and organized in a manner to allow substantive
`review to begin? Is it legible, indexed, and/or paginated
`adequately?
`
`2 Has the applicant submitted an overall description of the
`manufacturing processes and microbiological controls used
`in the manufacture of the drug product?
`3 Has the applicant submitted protocols and results of
`validation studies concerning microbiological control
`processes used in the manufacture of the drug product?
`4 Are any study reports or published articles in a foreign
`language? If yes, has the translated version been included
`in the submission for review?
`5 Has the applicant submitted preservative effectiveness
`studies (if applicable) and container-closure integrity
`studies?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`1
`
`Comments
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The drug product is
`not preserved.
`Integrity testing is
`covered in section
`3.2.P.2.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` X
`
`6 Has the applicant submitted microbiological specifications
`for the drug product and a description of the test methods?
`7 Has the applicant submitted the results of analytical method
`verification studies?
`8 Has the applicant submitted all special/critical studies/data
`requested during pre-submission meetings and/or
`discussions?
`
`X
`
`X
`
`
`
`Is this NDA fileable? If not, then describe why.
`
`X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3052513
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`Additional Comments: The application was submitted in eCTD format. The drug product is
`
`
`No such studies were
`requested from the
`New Drug
`Microbiology Staff
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date
`
`Date
`
`Reviewing Microbiologist
`Stephen E. Langille, Ph.D.
`
`Microbiology Secondary Reviewer/Team Leader
`John Metcalfe, Ph.D. Senior Microbiology Reviewer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3052513
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`STEPHEN E LANGILLE
`12/01/2011
`
`JOHN W METCALFE
`12/01/2011
`I concur.
`
`Reference ID: 3052513
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket