throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`203168Orig1s000
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND
`BIOPHARMACEUTICS REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`OFFICE OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW
`
`NDA:
`
`203,168
`
`Submission Date(s):
`
`June 7, 2012
`
`Brand Name
`
`Prolensa
`
`Generic Name
`
`Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07%
`
`Primary Reviewer
`
`Yoriko Harigaya, PharmD.
`
`Team Leader
`
`Philip Colangelo, Pharm.D., PhD.
`
`0CP Division
`
`Division of Clinical Pharmacology 4
`
`0ND Division
`
`Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products
`
`Applicant
`
`ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`Relevant IND(s)
`
`60,295
`
`Submission Type
`
`Original Submission: Standard Review
`
`Formulation; Strength(s) Bromfenac ophthahnic solution 0.07%
`
`Indication
`
`Treatment of inflammation and pain associated with cataract
`extraction
`
`
`
`1. EXECUTIVE SUMNIARY
`
`The sponsor submitted an original New Drug Application (NDA) for Prolensa®
`(bromfenac ophthahnic solution 0.07%) on June 7, 2012. Prolensa®, administered once
`daily (QD), is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) studied in clinical trials
`for the treatment of postoperative inflammation and the reduction of ocular pain in
`subjects who have undergone cataract surgery. The proposed dosage and route of
`administration for Prolensa® for this indication is as follows: instill one drop of
`bromfenac ophthahnic solution 0.07% into the affected eye once daily beginning 1 day
`prior to surgery, continued on the day of surgery, and through the first 14 days post-
`surgery.
`
`This ProlensaD formulation (0.07%) differs from the currently marketed bromfenac
`ophthalmic solution 0.09% product (BromdayO) in the amounts of bromfenac sodilnn and
`its target pH.
`mm
`The indication is the same as the currently marketed
`product, Bromday (bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09%), administered QD. sNDA
`21,664 for Bromday® was approved by the Agency on October 16, 2010 with a change in
`dosage regimen from the previously approved (March 24, 2005) twice-a-day (BID)
`dosing for Xibrom® (bromfenac sodium ophthalmic solution 0.1%) following cataract
`extraction surgery to QD dosing beginning 1 day prior to cataract surgery, continue on
`the day of surgery, and for 14 days after cataract surgery.
`
`Reference ID: 3263614
`
`

`

`No new clinical pharmacology data was presented in this supplement. Thus, no review is
`needed for this NDA submission. For information of the pharmacokinetic (PK)
`characteristics of Xibrom® (bromfenac sodium ophthalmic solution 0.1% BID), please
`refer to the Office of Clinical Pharmacology review of the original NDA 21,664 (by Dr.
`Lei Zhang dated March 8, 2005). For the efficacy study information of Bromday®
`(formerly XiDay®) (bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% QD), please refer to the Office
`of Clinical Pharmacology review of the NDA 21,664 / SE2-013 (by Dr. Kimberly L.
`Bergman dated July 12, 2010).
`
`The sponsor conducted two Phase 3 studies S00124-ER and S00124-WR evaluated the
`efficacy and safety of Prolensa® vs. placebo for the treatment of ocular inflammation and
`pain associated with cataract surgery.
`
`1.1 Recommendation
`From a Clinical Pharmacology perspective, the application is acceptable. No new clinical
`pharmacology data was presented in this supplement.
`
`1.2 Labeling Recommendations
`Please refer to Section 2 for detailed labeling recommendations.
`
`1.3 Phase 4 Requirements
`No Phase IV study recommendation.
`
`1.4 Summary of Important Clinical Pharmacology Findings
`No additional pharmacological studies were conducted for this NDA.
`
`2. LABELING RECOMMENDATIONS
`In the current submission (NDA 203,162 dated June 7, 2012), the applicant has proposed
`no changes to the already existing Clinical Pharmacology section in the approved label
`for Xibrom® and Bromday®. The labeling proposed for this supplement is acceptable
`from a clinical pharmacology perspective (see proposed labeling below), and there are no
`labeling revisions / edits to be sent to the sponsor.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`12
`12.1 Mechanism of Action
`Bromfenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that has anti-
`inflammatory activity. The mechanism of its action is thought to be due to its ability
`to block prostaglandin synthesis by inhibiting cyclooxygenase 1 and 2.
`
`Prostaglandins have been shown in many animal models to be mediators of certain
`kinds of intraocular inflammation. In studies performed in animal eyes,
`prostaglandins have been shown to produce disruption of the blood-aqueous humor
`barrier, vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, leukocytosis, and increased
`intraocular pressure.
`
`Reference ID: 3263614
`
`2
`
`

`

`12.3 Pharmacokinetics
`The plasma concentration of bromfenac following ocular administration of 0.07%
`Prolensa (bromfenac ophthalmic solution) in humans is unknown. Based on the
`maximum proposed dose of one drop to the eye (0.035 mg) and PK information from
`other routes of administration, the systemic concentration of bromfenac is estimated
`to be below the limit of quantification (50 ng/mL) at steady-state in humans.
`
`Reference ID: 3263614
`
`3
`
`

`

`3. OCP Filing and Review Form
`Office of Clinical Pharmacology
`
`New Drug Application Filing and Review Form
`
`General Information About the Submission
`Information
`
`203,168
`IV
`DTOP
`Yoriko Harigaya, Pharm.D.
`
`Brand Name
`Generic Name
`Drug Class
`Indication(s)
`
`
`
`NDA/BLA Number
`OCP Division (I, II, III, IV, V)
`Medical Division
`OCP Reviewer
`
`OCP Team Leader
`
`Pharmacometrics Reviewer
`Date of Submission
`Estimated Due Date of OCP Review
`
`Philip M. Colangelo, Pharm.D.,
`Ph.D.
`N/A
`June 7, 2012
`March 7, 2012
`
`Dosage Form
`
`Dosing Regimen
`Route of Administration
`Sponsor
`
`Medical Division Due Date
`
`PDUFA Due Date
`
`N/A
`April 7, 2013
`
`Priority Classification
`
`
`Information
`Prolensa
`Bromfenac
`NSAID
`Treatment of
`inflammation and pain
`associated with cataract
`extraction
`Ophthalmic solution
`
`Once daily dose
`Topical
`ISTA Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc.
`Standard
`
`
`
`
`STUDY TYPE
`Table of Contents present and sufficient to
`locate reports, tables, data, etc.
`Tabular Listing of All Human Studies
`HPK Summary
`Labeling
`Reference Bioanalytical and Analytical
`Methods
`I. Clinical Pharmacology
` Mass balance:
`
` Isozyme characterization:
` Blood/plasma ratio:
` Plasma protein binding:
` Pharmacokinetics (e.g., Phase I) -
`
`Healthy Volunteers-
`
`Patients-
`
`single dose:
`multiple dose:
`
`single dose:
`multiple dose:
`
`Reference ID: 3263614
`
`Clin. Pharm. and Biopharm. Information
`“X” if included
`Number of
`Number of
`at filing
`studies
`studies
`submitted
`reviewed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Critical Comments If any
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Refer to the OCP review of
`the original NDA 21,664 by
`Dr. Lei Zhang (Mar. 8, 2005)
`and Efficacy Supplement by
`Dr. Kimberly L. Bergman
`(July 12, 2010)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Refer to the OCP review of
`the original NDA 21,664 by
`Dr. Lei Zhang (Mar. 8, 2005)
`and Efficacy Supplement by
`Dr. Kimberly L. Bergman
`(July 12, 2010)
`
`4
`
`

`

` Dose proportionality -
`fasting / non-fasting single dose:
`fasting / non-fasting multiple dose:
` Drug-drug interaction studies -
`In-vivo effects on primary drug:
`In-vivo effects of primary drug:
`In-vitro:
`
` Subpopulation studies -
`
` PD -
`
` PK/PD -
`
` Population Analyses -
`
`Phase 1 and/or 2, proof of concept:
`Phase 3 clinical trial:
`
`ethnicity:
`gender:
`pediatrics:
`geriatrics:
`renal impairment:
`hepatic impairment:
`
`Phase 2:
`Phase 3:
`
`Data rich:
`Data sparse:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`II. Biopharmaceutics
` Absolute bioavailability
` Relative bioavailability -
`
`solution as reference:
`alternate formulation as reference:
` Bioequivalence studies -
`traditional design; single / multi dose:
`replicate design; single / multi dose:
` Food-drug interaction studies
` Bio-waiver request based on BCS
` BCS class
` Dissolution study to evaluate alcohol induced
` dose-dumping
`III. Other CPB Studies
` Genotype/phenotype studies
` Chronopharmacokinetics
` Pediatric development plan
` Literature References
`Total Number of Studies
`
`
`Reference ID: 3263614
`
`5
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`YORIKO HARIGAYA
`02/19/2013
`
`PHILIP M COLANGELO
`02/19/2013
`
`Reference ID: 3263614
`
`

`

`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS
` FILING FORM/CHECKLIST FOR NDA/BLA or Supplement
`
`Office of Clinical Pharmacology
`New Drug Application Filing and Review Form
`
`General Information About the Submission
`
`
`NDA/BLA Number
`OCP Division (I, II, III, IV, V)
`Medical Division
`OCP Reviewer
`
`Information
`203,168
`IV
`DTOP
`Yoriko Harigaya, Pharm.D.
`
`
`
`Brand Name
`Generic Name
`Drug Class
`Indication(s)
`
`OCP Team Leader
`
`Pharmacometrics Reviewer
`Date of Submission
`Estimated Due Date of OCP Review
`
`Philip M. Colangelo, Pharm.D.,
`Ph.D.
`N/A
`June 7, 2012
`March 7, 2012
`
`Dosage Form
`
`Dosing Regimen
`Route of Administration
`Sponsor
`
`Medical Division Due Date
`
`PDUFA Due Date
`
`N/A
`April 7, 2013
`
`Priority Classification
`
`
`Information
`Prolensa
`Bromfenac
`NSAID
`Treatment of
`inflammation and pain
`associated with cataract
`extraction
`Ophthalmic solution
`
`Once daily dose
`Topical
`ISTA Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc.
`Standard
`
`
`
`
`STUDY TYPE
`Table of Contents present and sufficient to
`locate reports, tables, data, etc.
`Tabular Listing of All Human Studies
`HPK Summary
`Labeling
`Reference Bioanalytical and Analytical
`Methods
`I. Clinical Pharmacology
` Mass balance:
`
` Isozyme characterization:
` Blood/plasma ratio:
` Plasma protein binding:
` Pharmacokinetics (e.g., Phase I) -
`
`(cid:42)(cid:71)(cid:67)(cid:78)(cid:86)(cid:74)(cid:91) (cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:87)(cid:80)(cid:86)(cid:71)(cid:71)(cid:84)(cid:85)(cid:15)
`
`Patients-
`
`single dose:
`multiple dose:
`
`single dose:
`
`Clin. Pharm. and Biopharm. Information
`“X” if included
`Number of
`Number of
`at filing
`studies
`studies
`submitted
`reviewed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Critical Comments If any
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Refer to the OCP review of
`the original NDA 21,664 by
`Dr. Lei Zhang (Mar. 8, 2005)
`and Efficacy Supplement by
`Dr. Kimberly L. Bergman
`(Dec. 18, 2009)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`File name: 5_Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Filing Form/Checklist for
`NDA_BLA or Supplement 090808
`Reference ID: 3167645
`
`

`

`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS
` FILING FORM/CHECKLIST FOR NDA/BLA or Supplement
`
`multiple dose:
`
`X
`
`
`
`
`
` Dose proportionality -
`fasting / non-fasting single dose:
`fasting / non-fasting multiple dose:
` Drug-drug interaction studies -
`In-vivo effects on primary drug:
`In-vivo effects of primary drug:
`In-vitro:
`
` Subpopulation studies -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Refer to the OCP review of
`the original NDA 21,664 by
`Dr. Lei Zhang (Mar. 8, 2005)
`and Efficacy Supplement by
`Dr. Kimberly L. Bergman
`(Dec. 18, 2009)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ethnicity:
`gender:
`pediatrics:
`geriatrics:
`renal impairment:
`hepatic impairment:
`
`Phase 2:
`Phase 3:
`
`Data rich:
`Data sparse:
`
` PD -
`
` PK/PD -
`
` Population Analyses -
`
`Phase 1 and/or 2, proof of concept:
`Phase 3 clinical trial:
`
`II. Biopharmaceutics
` Absolute bioavailability
` Relative bioavailability -
`
`solution as reference:
`alternate formulation as reference:
` Bioequivalence studies -
`traditional design; single / multi dose:
`replicate design; single / multi dose:
` Food-drug interaction studies
` Bio-waiver request based on BCS
` BCS class
` Dissolution study to evaluate alcohol induced
` dose-dumping
`III. Other CPB Studies
` Genotype/phenotype studies
` Chronopharmacokinetics
` Pediatric development plan
` Literature References
`Total Number of Studies
`
`
`On initial review of the NDA/BLA application for filing:
`
`Content Parameter
`Criteria for Refusal to File (RTF)
`1 Has the applicant submitted bioequivalence data comparing to-be-
`marketed product(s) and those used in the pivotal clinical trials?
`2 Has the applicant provided metabolism and drug-drug interaction
`information?
`
`Yes No N/A Comment
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`X
`
`X
`
`
`
`
`
`File name: 5_Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Filing Form/Checklist for
`NDA_BLA or Supplement 090808
`Reference ID: 3167645
`
`

`

`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS
` FILING FORM/CHECKLIST FOR NDA/BLA or Supplement
`
`3 Has the sponsor submitted bioavailability data satisfying the CFR
`requirements?
`4 Did the sponsor submit data to allow the evaluation of the validity of
`the analytical assay?
`5 Has a rationale for dose selection been submitted?
`6
`Is the clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutics section of the NDA
`organized, indexed and paginated in a manner to allow substantive
`review to begin?
`Is the clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutics section of the NDA
`legible so that a substantive review can begin?
`Is the electronic submission searchable, does it have appropriate
`hyperlinks and do the hyperlinks work?
`
`7
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`X
`
`
`
`X
`
`X
`
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`14
`
`17
`
`Criteria for Assessing Quality of an NDA (Preliminary Assessment of Quality)
` Data
`9 Are the data sets, as requested during pre-submission discussions,
`submitted in the appropriate format (e.g., CDISC)?
`If applicable, are the pharmacogenomic data sets submitted in the
`appropriate format?
` Studies and Analyses
`11
`Is the appropriate pharmacokinetic information submitted?
`12 Has the applicant made an appropriate attempt to determine reasonable
`dose individualization strategies for this product (i.e., appropriately
`designed and analyzed dose-ranging or pivotal studies)?
`13 Are the appropriate exposure-response (for desired and undesired
`effects) analyses conducted and submitted as described in the
`Exposure-Response guidance?
`Is there an adequate attempt by the applicant to use exposure-response
`relationships in order to assess the need for dose adjustments for
`intrinsic/extrinsic factors that might affect the pharmacokinetic or
`pharmacodynamics?
`15 Are the pediatric exclusivity studies adequately designed to
`demonstrate effectiveness, if the drug is indeed effective?
`16 Did the applicant submit all the pediatric exclusivity data, as described
`in the WR?
`Is there adequate information on the pharmacokinetics and exposure-
`response in the clinical pharmacology section of the label?
` General
`18 Are the clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutics studies of
`appropriate design and breadth of investigation to meet basic
`requirements for approvability of this product?
`19 Was the translation (of study reports or other study information) from
`another language needed and provided in this submission?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IS THE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY SECTION OF THE APPLICATION FILEABLE?
`Yes
`
`If the NDA/BLA is not fileable from the clinical pharmacology perspective, state the reasons and provide
`comments to be sent to the Applicant.
`
`File name: 5_Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Filing Form/Checklist for
`NDA_BLA or Supplement 090808
`Reference ID: 3167645
`
`

`

`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS
` FILING FORM/CHECKLIST FOR NDA/BLA or Supplement
`
`N/A
`
`Please identify and list any potential review issues to be forwarded to the Applicant for the 74-day letter.
`There are no potential review issues to be forwarded to the applicant for the 74 day letter from a clinical
`pharmacology perspective.
`
`Reviewing Clinical Pharmacologist
`
`Team Leader/Supervisor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date
`
`Date
`
`File name: 5_Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Filing Form/Checklist for
`NDA_BLA or Supplement 090808
`Reference ID: 3167645
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`YORIKO HARIGAYA
`07/31/2012
`
`PHILIP M COLANGELO
`08/01/2012
`
`Reference ID: 3167645
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket