throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`203168Orig1s000
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`To: NDA 203168 File
`
`Date: O5-April-2013
`
`From: Rapti D. Madurawe, Ph.D., Branch Chief, Branch V/Division II, ONDQA
`
`Dr. Rao Kambhampati recommended CMC labeling revisions in Addendum1 to Review #1 dated
`04-April-2013. The recommended labeling changes may be made post-approval and the NDA
`may be approved with the current labeling provided in Amendment 0012 dated 03-April-2013.
`
`Reference ID: 3288889
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`RAPTI D MADURAWE
`04/05/2013
`
`Reference ID: 3288889
`
`

`

`NDA# 203168
`Addendum 1 to Quality Review #1
`For Division of Topical and Ophthalmology Products
`
`1. NDA# 203168
`
`2. Amendment # and Date: 0011 dated 3/18/13
`
`3. REVIEW DATE: 4-4-13
`
`4. REVIEWER: Rao V. Kambhampati, Ph.D.
`
`5. PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS:
`Previous Documents
`N203168 ORIG-1 0000 (0) Quality Review
`
`6. SUBMISSION(S) BEING REVIEWED:
`
`Document Date
`2/25/13
`
`Submissions Reviewed
`NDA 203-168 Amendment 0011 (11)
`
`Global Submit Date
`3/18/13
`
`7. NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:
`
`
`
`Name:
`
`Address:
`
`Representative:
`
`Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (formerly ISTA
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)
`50 Technology Drive
`Irvine, CA 92618
`N/A
`
`Telephone:
`
`949-727-0833
`
`8. DRUG PRODUCT NAME/CODE/TYPE:
`
`a) Proprietary Name: ProlensaTM
`b) Non-Proprietary Name (USAN): Bromfenac ophthalmic solution, 0.07%
`c) Code Name/# (ONDQA only): N/A
`d) Chem. Type/Submission Priority (ONDC only):
`• Chem. Type: 5
`• Submission Priority: S
`
`9. LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBMISSION: NDA (CDA, 21 CFR 314.50), 505 (b)(1)
`
`Reference ID: 3287796
`
`

`

`10. PHARMACOL CATEGORY: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)
`for ophthalmic use (Cyclooxygenase 1 and 2
`inhibitor)
`
`11. DOSAGE FORM:
`
` Ophthalmic solution
`
`12. STRENGTH/POTENCY: 0.07%
`
`13. ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Topical (ocular) instillation
`
`14. Rx/OTC DISPENSED: _X__Rx ___OTC
`
`15. SPOTS (SPECIAL PRODUCTS ON-LINE TRACKING SYSTEM):
`SPOTS product – Form Completed
`
` X Not a SPOTS product
`
`16. CHEMICAL NAME, STRUCTURAL FORMULA, MOLECULAR
`FORMULA, MOLECULAR WEIGHT:
`Sodium [2-amino-3-(4-bromobenzoyl) phenyl] acetate sesquihydrate
`or
`Benzeneacetic acid, 2-amino-3-(4-bromobenzoyl)-, monosodium salt, sesquihydrate
`
`C15H11 BrNNaO3 • 1½ H2O
`383.17
`USAN Name: Bromfenac sodium
`
`Reference ID: 3287796
`
`2
`
`

`

`Review
`
`The Quality (CMC) review ofthis NDA# 203-168 wasfiled in DARRTS on 2/26/13. On 3/18/13,
`the applicant submitted an amendment #0011 (11) in response to the DTOP ’s e-mail
`communication dated 3/15/13 regarding labeling and labels. This addendum includes the quality
`review ofthe amendment #11.
`
`Package Inselt: The changes below (indicated in red) are recommended to the draftpackage
`insert that was submitted in amendment #11. The recommended changes show the active as a
`sesquihydrate
`”m
`
`11 DESCRIPTION
`
`PROLENSA (bromfenac ophthahnic solution) 0.07% is a sterile, topical, nonsteroidal anti-
`inflammatory drug (NSAID) for ophthalmic use. Each mL of PROLENSA contains 0.805
`mg bromfenac sodium sesquihydrate (equivalent to 0.7 mg bromfenac free acid). Bromfenac
`sodium is designated chemically as sodium [2-amino-3-(4-bromobenzoyl) phenyl] acetate
`
`sesquihydrate, with an empirical formula of C15H11BrNNa03O l‘/2H20. The chemical
`stiucture for bromfenac sodium
`M“) is:
`
`HzN
`
`CHzcozm - 11/2H20
`
`Bromfenac sodium is a yellow to orange crystalline powder. The molecular weight of
`bromfenac sodium is 383.17. PROLENSA ophthahnic solution is supplied as a sterile
`aqueous 0.07% solution, with a pH of 7.8. The osmolality of PROLENSA ophthahnic
`solution is approximately 300 mOsmol/kg.
`
`Each mL of PROLENSA ophthalmic solution contains:
`Active: bromfenac sodium
`(m4) sesquihydrate
`mm bromfenac free acid.
`
`mm which is equivalent to
`
`”(000094:
`Preservative: benzalkonium chloride
`Inactives: boric acid, edetate disodium, povidone, sodilim borate, sodium sulfite, tyloxapol,
`sodium hydroxide to adjust pH and water for injection, USP.
`
`Container and Carton Labels: The applicant submitted the following revised labels for the
`packaging configurations indicated in the Table 1 below:
`
`Reference ID: 3287796
`
`

`

`Tabb 1. Draft Iabeiag Coupe-eats for PROM-INSA" (bro-mac
`
`ophthal-ie solution) 0.07%
`
`0.6 mL Fromm Sample
`
`0-5 IL Sample Bottle Label
`
`NDC No. 2420860106
`
`0.6 “.1, 3““, Cum
`
`0.8 mL momma: Sample
`
`0-8 IL Sample Bottle Label
`
`NDCNo. 24208-601—08
`
`03 mL Sal-pk Cm”
`
`3ILSampleCarton
`
`15 mL Trade
`
`1.6 IL Sample Bottle Label
`
`NDCNo. 24208-601-01
`
`l6 “IL Sa-ple Carton
`
`
`
`_mLTad:_N°”ML”
`
`3ILSampleBottleLabel
`
`Reference ID: 3287796
`
`
`
`

`

`Comments: The above revised draft labels contain all the required CMC related information
`except the carton labels do not contain equivalency statement for the active ingredient.
`Presently, the statement reads as follows: “Each mL of Prolensa ophthalmic solution contains:
`Active: bromfenac sodium hydrate 0.805 mg”. Preservative: benzalkonium chloride (0.005%)
`……….. In this statement active is given in mg, active name includes “hydrate”, no equivalency
`statement, and benzalkonium chloride is given in %. Preservative is identified separately.
`
`Reference ID: 3287796
`
`11
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`, the same a Iicant
`
`To a related NDA# 21-664
`Lamb submitted
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3287796
`
`

`

`ForNDA203—168CartonLabels: “EachmLoiProlensamoihthalmicsolutioncontains:
`
`Conclusion and Recommendation: We recommend the above changes to the draftpackage
`insert and carton labels.
`
`Primary Reviewer: Rao V. Kambhampati, Ph.D.
`
`Secondary Reviewer: Rapti Madurawe, Ph.D.
`
`Reference ID: 3287796
`
`13
`
`

`

`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`
`RAO V KAMBHAM PATI
`
`04/04/2013
`
`RAPTl D MADURAWE
`
`04/04/2013
`
`Reference ID: 3297113
`Reference ID: 3297118
`Reference lD'. 32877 6
`
`

`

` CHEMISTRY REVIEW
`
`NDA 203168
`
`ProlensaTM (bromfenac ophthalmic solution) 0.07%
`
`Applicant: ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`Quality (CMC) Review #1
`
`Rao V. Kambhampati, Ph.D.
`
`For Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products
`(DTOP)
`
`Reference ID: 3267244
`
`

`

`
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Table of Contents .....................................................................................................2
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet.................................................................................3
`
`The Executive Summary .........................................................................................7
`
`1. Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 7
`
`A. Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability ....................................................................... 7
`
`B. Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post-Marketing) Commitments. Agreements, and/or Risk
`Management Steps, if Approvable ................................................................................................... 7
`
`II. Summary of Chemistry Assessments.........................................................................................7
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s) ............................................................. 7
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used.......................................................... 9
`
`C. Basis for Approvability or Not-Approval Recommendation ............................................................ 9
`
`III. Administrative ......................................................................................................................... 10
`
`A. Reviewer’s Signature ...................................................................................................................... 10
`
`B. Endorsement Block ......................................................................................................................... 10
`
`C. CC Block ........................................................................................................................................ 10
`
`Chemistry Assessment ........................................................................................... l 1
`
`I. Review Of Common Technical Document-Quality (Ctd-Q) Module 3.2: Body Of Data ....... 11
`
`S DRUG SUBSTANCE ................................................................................................................... 11
`
`P DRUG PRODUCT [Bromfenac Ophthahnic Solution, 0.07% ..................................................... 21
`
`A APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. 90
`
`R REGIONAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................... 91
`
`II. Review Of Common Technical Document-Quality (Ctd—Q) Module 1 ..................................94
`
`A. Labeling & Package Insert ............................................................................................................ 94
`
`B. Environmental Assessment Or Claim Of Categorical Exclusion ................................................. 102
`
`III.
`
`List Of Deficiencies To Be Communicated ..................................................................... 103
`
`Reference ID: 3267244
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`NDA 203168
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`1. NDA# 203168
`
`2. REVIEW #: 1
`
`3. REVIEW DATE: 2—25—13
`
`4. REVIEWER: Rao V. Kambhampati, Ph.D.
`
`5. PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS:
`
`Previous Documents
`
`None
`
`Document Date
`
`6. SUBMISSION(S) BEING REVIEWED:
`
`Submissions Reviewed
`
`N203168 ORIG—l 0000 (0)
`Amendment 0001 (1)
`Amendment 0002 (2)
`Amendment 007 (7)
`Amendment 008 (8)
`Amendment 009 (9)
`
`M. NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:
`
`Global Submit Date
`
`6/7/2012
`
`8/21/12
`
`8/31/12
`
`11/19/12
`12/19/12
`
`12/21/12
`
`Name:
`
`Address:
`
`Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (formerly ISTA
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)
`50 Technology Drive
`Irvine, CA 92618
`
`Representative:
`
`N/A
`
`Telephone :
`
`949-727-0833
`
`M. DRUG PRODUCT NANHE/CODE/TYPE:
`
`Reference ID: 3267244
`
`Page 3 of 106
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`a) Proprietary Name: ProlensaTM
`b) Non-Proprietary Name (USAN): Bromfenac ophthalmic solution, 0.07%
`c) Code Name/# (ONDQA only): N/A
`d) Chem. Type/Submission Priority (ONDC only):
`
`NDA 203168
`
`0 Chem. Type: 5
`
`0 Submission Priority: S
`
`9. LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBMISSION: NDA (CDA, 21 CFR 314.50), 505 (b)(1)
`
`10. PHARMACOL CATEGORY: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)
`for ophthalmic use (Cyclooxygenase l and 2
`inhibitor)
`
`11. DOSAGE FORM:
`
`Ophthalmic solution
`
`12. STRENGTH/POTENCY: 0.07%
`
`13. ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Topical (ocular) instillation
`
`14. Rx/OTC DISPENSED:
`
`X Rx
`
`OTC
`
`15. SPOTS [SPECIAL PRODUCTS ON-LINE TRACKING SYSTEM 1:
`SPOTS product — Form Completed
`
`
`X Not a SPOTS product
`
`16. CHEMICAL NAME, STRUCTURAL FORMULA, MOLECULAR
`
`FORMULA, MOLECULAR WEIGHT:
`2-Amino-3-benzoylbenzeneacetamide
`or
`
`2-(2-Amino-3-benzoylphenyl)acetamide
`
`C15H11BrNN303 ° 1% H20
`383.17
`
`17. RELATED/SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
`
`M. DIVIFs:
`
`T
`
`ITEM
`
`YP HOLDER
`E
`
`REFEREN CODEl STATUS2
`CED
`
`DATE
`
`REVIEW
`
`COMPLETED Senju
`
`Bromfenac
`
`10/26/04 and
`
`Reference ID: 3267244
`
`Page 4 of 106
`
`

`

`CHEMISTRY REVIEW
`
`Chemis Review Data Sheet
`
`NDA 203168
`
`(Produced by
`Regis
`Technologies
`
`Adequate
`
` 11/26/12
`
`Adequate
`
`10/24/ 12
`
`Adequate
`
`12/19/12
`
`Adequate
`
`11/14/12
`
`Adequate
`
`1/26/07
`
`Adequate
`
`11/14/12
`
`Adequate
`
`8/31/07
`
`1 Action codes for DMF Table:
`l - DMF Reviewed.
`
`Other codes indicate why the DMF was not reviewed, as follows:
`2 —Type 1 DMF
`3 — Reviewed previously and no revision since last review
`4 — Sufficient information in application
`5 — Authority to reference not granted
`6 — DMF not available
`
`7 — Other (explain under “Comments”)
`
`Reference ID: 3267244
`
`Page 5 of 106
`
`

`

` '"fl‘t
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`NDA 203168
`
`2Adequate. Inadequate. or N/A (There is enough data in the application, therefore the DMF did
`not need to be reviewed)
`
`B. Other Documents:
`
`DOCUMENT
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`”m“ ”“3”“ 5“”
`Pfizer Inc., agent for Wyeth
`Pharmaceuticals
`
`Bromfenac (Sodium) Ophthalmic
`Solution(s)
`
`Bromfenac Ophthahnic Solution
`0.09%. Al troved
`
`
`
`
`M. STATUS:
`
`ONDC:
`
`CONSULTS/ CMC
`
`RELATED
`
`REVIEWS
`
`RECOMNIENDATION
`
`DATE
`
`LNC 0ND O A
`
`Not a 1 licable
`
`Methods Validation
`
`Not a o licable
`
`OMEPR
`
`Proprietary name
`acceptable (review in
`DARRTS
`
`7/27/12
`
`2/20/13
`
`2/20/13
`
`11/7/12
`
`A- Alexandrow I D-001
`
`Rao Kambham n ati, Ph.D.
`
`Rao Kambhamati, Ph.D.
`
`Jung Lee, RPh.
`
`Product Quality
`Microbiolo 3
`
`Accetable
`
`Acceptable
`
`1/30/13
`
`1/22/13
`
`Rao Kambha .. ati, PhD
`
`Stephene E. Langille, Ph.D.
`
`19. ORDER OF REVIEW (OGD Only): N/A
`
`The application submission(s) covered by this review was taken in the date order of
`receipt.
`Yes
`No
`Ifno, explain reason(s) below:
`
`Reference ID: 3267244
`
`Page 6 of 106
`
`

`

`
`
`Executive Summary Section
`NDA 203168
`The Chemistry Review for NDA 203168
`
`The Executive Summafl
`
`I. Recommendations
`
`A. Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability
`This NDA has provided sufficient information to assure the identity, strength, purity,
`and quality of the drug product. The labels have adequate CMC information as
`required. The tradename, ProlensaTM, for the drug product is acceptable. The
`establishment evaluation of the manufacturing and testing facilities was complete and
`the Office of Compliance issued an Overall Acceptable Recommendation for this NDA.
`From the CMC perspective, this NDA is recommended for approval.
`
`B. Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post-Marketing) Commitments, Agreements, and/or
`Risk Management Steps, if Approvable
`Not applicable.
`
`II. Summary of Chemistry Assessments
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s)
`
`Drug Substance:
`The Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) in the drug product is bromfenac sodium
`drug substance. The same drug substance is used in the manufacture of the currently
`marketed bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% formulation in this applicant’s original
`NDA 21-664, which was approved on 24 March 2005. The manufacturer and supplier,
`manufacturing process, test methods, specifications, and all other parameters are the
`same as those applied to the drug substance for the currently approved
`XibromTM/BromdayTM 0.09% formulation. Bausch & Lomb (formerly ISTA
`Pharmaceuticals', Inc.; ISTA) makes reference to Senju’s Type II Drug Master File
`ODMF) 16414 for pertinent information required for drug substance and a Letter of
`Authorization was provided from Senju. The original DlVIF was reviewed by Yong-de
`Lu (ONDQA) on 10/ 16/04, who found it to be adequate and the subsequent Annual
`Reports (1 to 10) were reviewed by this reviewer. The DMF is again found to be
`adequate and a Chemistry Review #2 (February 2013) was filed in DARRTS.
`
`Drug Product:
`The drug product is a non-steroidal anti—inflammatory drug (NSAID) for topical
`ophthalmic use. It is supplied as a clear, yellow, sterile solution containing 0.07%
`bromfenac free acid and dispensed from a 7.5cc capacity white low density
`polyethylene @DPE) bottle with a white linear m4) tip, and grey
`screw cap. The proposed trade sizes for the drug product are 1.6 mL and 3 mL per
`bottle. In addition, the applicant proposed sample sizes of 0.6 mL and 0.8 mL per
`bottle.
`
`0’) (4)
`
`Reference ID: 3267244
`
`Page 7 of 106
`
`

`

`
`
`Executive Summary Section
`
`NDA 203168
`
`Each 1 mL of the drug product contains 0.085 mg of bromfenac sodium sesquihydrate
`(equivalent to 0.07% of free acid form) as the active in edient and the followin
`excipients: boric acid
`and sodium borate
`
`
`
`sodium sulfite
`and pov1 one
`
`
`edetate disodium
`benzalkonium chloride
`
`
`
`preservative; and so um y 0x1 e 1 necessary to adjust pH to 7.8).
`
`The components of the container closure system used for bromfenac ophthalmic
`solution 0.07% are identical to the marketed bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09%.
`
`controlled dro
`
`er ti
`
`is then inserted.
`
`
`filled into 7.5 cc size*- round bottles mto w c a
`Bromfenac ophthalmic solution, 0.07%is
`
`
`screw-ongrafi cap. A
`
`
`
`
`tamper-evident
`
`
`neck of the bottle.
`
`is shrink-seale over
`
`e cap and the
`
`The drug product1s manufactured by Bausch & Lomb Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (B&L in
`Tam a, FL. The manufacturin
`
`
`
`The revised specification for the drug product included appearance of solution,
`description of container, identification (UV and HPLC , bromfenac sodium assay
`(HPLC; 90-110%), bromfenac '
`urities (total),
`any individual
`specified impurity (excluding
`), any individual unspecified impurity, pH,
`osmolality, benzalkonium chloride, EDTA, sodium sulfite, sterility, bacterial
`endotoxins, particulate matter, weight loss. In the initial specification, the applicant did
`not include tests for sodium sulfite and weight loss.
`
`B&L tests the incoming raw materials and, produces and tests the final product (release
`and ongoing stability). Container closure system was tested per USP <661> and <87>.
`In addition, drug product filled container closure systems were tested for
`leachable/extractable levels and studies are ongoing through end of shelf life. A safety
`
`Reference ID: 3267244
`
`Page 8 of 106
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 203168
`Executive Summary Section
`evaluation of these potential substances indicates the levels are below their safety
`threshold. The container closure system (bottle, dropper tip and cap) components aremm
`
`The container-closure system was shown to maintain
`the sterility of the finished product. Studies showed that the finished product is not
`adversely affected by light exposure or extreme temperatures.
`
`Bromfenac ophthahnic solution, 0.07% utilizes an
`
`com)
`
`The
`
`manufacturing process validation will be completed prior to commercialization. B&L
`will perform process validation on 3 consecutive commercial scale batches of
`bromfenac ophthalmic solution, 0.07%.
`
`Stability data are available for the 0.6 mL and 3 mL fill sizes. Although the stability of
`the 0.8 mL and 1.6 mL fill sizes were not directly investigated, these fill sizes are
`bracketed (based on ICH QlD) between two extreme fill sizes. The 0.8 mL fill is
`bracketed between the studied 0.6 mL and 1 mL configurations while the 1.6 mL fill is
`bracketed by the studied 1.5 mL and 3 mL configurations. Consequently, the proposed
`expiry for the 0.8 mL and 1.6 mL fill sizes will default to the most conservative of the
`bracketed extremes, which are the 0.6 mL and 3 mL fills, respectively. Based on 12
`months of real—time data, the expiration period granted is 12 months for the 0.8 and 0.6
`mL fill sizes. Based on 18 months of real-time data, the expiration dating period
`granted is 22 months for the 1.6 and 3 mL fill sizes. The recommended label storage
`condition is 15°C-25°C (59°F-77°F).
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used
`PROLENSATM (bromfenac ophthahnic solution) 0.07% is supplied in a white LDPE
`plastic squeeze bottle with a 15 mm mmwhite dropper-tip and 15 mm
`mm
`gray cap as follows:
`
`0 1.6mL in a 7.5mL container (NDC 24208-602-01)
`
`. 3.0mL in a 7.5mL container (NDC 24208-602-03)
`One drop of PROLENSATM ophthahnic solution is applied to the affected eye once
`daily beginning 1 day prior to cataract surgery, continued on the day of surgery, and
`through the first 14 days of the postoperative period.
`
`In addition, Prolensa is supplied in sample size bottles (7.5 mL) containing 0.6 mL or
`0.8 mL solution.
`
`. Basis for Approvability or Not-Approval Recommendation
`The applicant resolved all the CMC related deficiencies that were communicated in the
`74-day and IR letter. The proposed formulation (0.07%) is a lower strength formulation
`of the currently approved formulation (0.09%) with some changes in the some of the
`excipients. The drug substance is manufactured and tested by the same facilities that are
`
`Reference ID: 3267244
`
`Page 9 of 106
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 203168
`Executive Summary Section
`used for approved formulation. The applicant demonstrated that the drug product can be
`manufactured with consistent quality and purity by providing adequate batch analysis
`and including controls in the manufacturing and packaging operations. The
`specification for drug substance and drug product included all the tests that are required
`for a topical ophthahnic solution. Adequate stability data were provided for the drug
`substance and drug product. The product quality microbiology of this NDA was
`reviewed by the Microbiology Staff (OPS) reviewer and it was found to be acceptable
`after addressing all the deficiencies in the NDA. All the facilities involved in the
`manufacturing, testing, and packaging of the drug substance and drug product were
`found to be acceptable and an Overall Acceptable Recommendation for this NDA was
`issued by the Office of Compliance. The established name need not be reviewed
`because it is already marketed with the same name. The tradename, ProlensaTM, is
`acceptable from all the reviewers stand point as well as by the OMEPR (CDER).
`
`III. Administrative
`
`A. Reviewer’s Signature
`
`Rao V. Kambhampati, Ph.D.
`
`B. Endorsement Block
`
`Primary Reviewer/Date: Rao V. Kambhampati, Ph.D.
`Secondary Reviewer/Date: Rapti Madurawe, PhD.
`
`C. CC Block
`
`96 Pages have been Wlfllheld in Full as b4 (CCIITS) immediately
`following this page.
`
`Reference ID: 3267244
`
`Page 10 of 106
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`RAO V KAMBHAMPATI
`02/26/2013
`
`RAPTI D MADURAWE
`02/26/2013
`
`Reference ID: 3267244
`
`

`

`Initial Quality Assessment Branch V
`Pre-Marketing Assessment Division II
`
` OND Division : Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products
` NDA : 203-168
` Applicant : ISTA
` Stamp Date : 07 June, 2012
` Proposed Trademark : Prolensa*
` Established Name : Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07%
` Dosage Form : Ophthalmic solution
` Route of Administration : Topical
` Strength : 0.07%
` Indication: Treatment of inflammation and pain associated with
`cataract extraction
` Reviewer : Rao Kambhampati
`Quality Micro Reviewer: Steven Langille
` CMC Lead : Bala Shanmugam
`
` YES NO
`
`
`
`
` Acceptable for filing:
`Comments for 74-Day Letter:
`
`Summary and Critical Issues
`
`Summary
`
`Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% is administered once daily for the treatment of
`postoperative inflammation and reduction of ocular pain after cataract surgery. The NDA
`is filed as a 505 (b) (1). The submission is all electronic and located in the EDR (Link:
`\\CDSESUB1\EVSPROD\NDA203168\203168.enx)
`
`ISTA, the sponsor of the NDA under review is currently marketing a similar product,
`Bromday(cid:149) (bromfenac ophthalmic solution), 0.09% which was approved in 2010 (sNDA
`21664) which itself had a change in dosing regimen (QD) compared to the previously
`approved (March 2005) twice-a-day Xibrom(cid:149) product.
`
`In addition to the change in the concentration of bromfenac sodium, the current
`formulation has been slightly modified as compared to the approved product in that it
`replaces
` with tyloxapol. Bausch and Lomb, the manufacturer of the
`approved product will also manufacture the new formulation. The drug substance
`manufacturer also remains to be the same (Regis Technologies).
`
`* Based on initial evaluation, the proposed proprietary name was determined to be
`“conditionally acceptable” (Section 1.6.3, General Correspondence, Communication of
`May 14, 2012).
`
`Reference ID: 3164499
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`IQA-NDA 203168
`
`Chemistry information for the drug substance, bromfenac sodium is referenced to DMF
`16414. A LOA from the DMF holder, Senju Pharmaceuticals is provided. Please note that
`Regis Technologies is the contract manufacturer of the drug substance.
`
`The drug product is formulated as a sterile ophthalmic solution for topical administration
`and the proposed commercial trade sizes are 1.6 mL and 3.0 mL in 7.5 mL LDPE bottle.
`Additionally, physician sample size of 0.6 mL and/or 0.8 mL in 7.5 mL LDPE bottle is
`also being proposed. Please note that bracketing approach has been used to support
`stability of the different fill volumes. The company is requesting a shelf-life of 12-months
`for the physician sample sizes and 22-months for the 1.6 mL and 3.0 mL commercial
`sizes when stored at 15-25(cid:113)C.
`
`Manufacturing and testing facilities have been entered in EES.
`
`The IND related to this submission is IND 060295. Please note that a pre-NDA meeting
`was held. The minutes of the Pre-NDA meeting is attached to this IQA for immediate
`reference.
`
`This NDA will be reviewed on a Standard time line.
`
`Important Timelines:
`
`(cid:120) Primary reviews - March 3, 2013
`(cid:120) Proposed labeling to applicant- target date- March 10, 2013
`(cid:120) CDTL review- March 17, 2013
`(cid:120) Circulate action package- March 17, 2013
`(cid:120) PDUFA – April 7, 2013
`
`Drug Substance
`
`All drug substance information related to manufacturing (contract manufactured by Regis
`Technologies) and controls is referenced to DMF 16414 (see table for status of this DMF
`at the time of this IQA). A letter of authorization from the DMF holder, Senju
`Pharmaceuticals has been provided.
`
`Reference ID: 3164499
`
`2
`
`

`

`-m .0.W“—Substance
`
`(Yes/No)
`
`IQA-NDA 203168
`
`
`
`sodium
`
`The last review is by
`Yong De Lu, dated
`October 26, 2004.
`
`There are several
`Annual Reports to be
`reviewed.
`
`0 As indicated above, Regis Technologies, Morton Grove, IL is the contract
`manufacturer for Senju Pharmaceuticals.
`
`0 The sponsor also references NDA 21-664 Wyeth) substance for the drug substance
`and has and provided a LOA from Pfizer (agent for Wyeth).
`0 Per company statement (Section 2.3.8.1), the manufacturing process, controls,
`specifications etc are the same as those for the drug substance for the currently
`approved.
`
`Drug Product
`
`The product is formulated as a sterile, preserved ophthahnic solution.
`. The drug product is manufactured by Bausch and Lomb, Inc., Tampa FL.
`. All excipients used in the formulation are compendial
`. The drug product composition is attached to this review
`. Manufacturing process involves
`
`m4)
`
`0) (4)
`
`Whether adequate iii-process tests are in place
`to ensure thatproduct quality does not deteriorate during hold time should be
`verified.
`. Table 2 in Section 3.2.P.3.3 provides a summary of the batch lots used in clinical
`and stability for which executed batch records have been provided.
`. The DP specification is attached for quick reference. The company has proposed
`separate release and regulatory specification with differences in acceptance
`criteria for pH, osmolality, benzalkonium chloride and EDTA. The acceptance
`limits for
`M“) is set at NMT (um) and total impurities at NMT mm) The
`impurities listed in Table 1, Section 3.2.P. 5.1 does not list those specified in Table
`4, Report S00156—R (Stability Reportfrom Primary Stability Batches of
`Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.07%). Specifically, the above referenced
`report, the specification includes test and acceptance limitfor
`at NMT mm The reporting ofthe impurities
`requires careful scrutiny and also consulted with Pharm/Tox on the qualification
`ofthe impurities. The proposed acceptance valuesfor the aforementioned
`(specifically of
`mm) should be evaluated and
`tightened ifneeded based on batch and stability data. Additionally, the proposed
`impurities and the levels should be compared to the currently marketed approved
`product.
`The specification does notprovide a testfor residual solvents. It needs to be
`verified ifpotential residual solvents are controlled in the raw materials. The
`
`(ID) (4)
`
`.
`
`Reference ID: 3164499
`
`

`

`IQA-NDA 203168
`
`.
`
`needfor the company to provide a statement that the drugproduct complies with
`USP <467> can be determined during review.
`. While providing testsfor sodium sulfite and weight loss (the later is proposed
`onlyfor stability), the drugproduct specification does notprovide acceptance
`criteriafor both attributes. The company shouldpropose appropriate acceptance
`limitsfor these quality attributes.
`. As indicated earlier, bracketing approach has been used in supporting stability of
`the variousfill sizes proposed. The proposed trade sizes are 1.6 mL and 3.0 mL
`and the proposed sample sizes are 0.6 ml. and/or 0.8 mL. Stability studies have
`used 0.6 mL, 1.0 mL, 1.5 L, and 3.0 mLfill sizes which brackets the 0.8 ml sample
`size and the 1.6 mL trade size. What, ifany, efirects ofthe (difl'erent) headspace in
`the various packaging configurations have on the quality ofthe product over the
`shelf-life should be assessed.
`The trend in quality attributes on stability should be evaluated in considering the
`proposed shelf-life of22-months and how it aflects, ifany the shelf-life attributes
`ofthe drugproduct. Any correlation between the observed trends may aid in the
`tightening ofthe specification and in determining the appropriate shelf-life. For
`example, is the observed trend in assay values influenced by the weight loss/gain?
`Among the quality attributes tested, the trends are prominent with osmolality,
`assayfor sodium sulfite (note there is a significant drop in value in the initial
`stages) and weight loss irrespective ofthe orientation. The trends are even more
`pronounced under accelerated conditions. In addition to the eflect on quality, the
`other question to consider is, how will the drugproduct, for marketing, be
`shipped and iftransportation storage conditions will impact the quality ofthe
`product.
`The leachable study has identified several organic volatile and organic semi-
`volatile leachables peaks and several unidentified (see above referenced report).
`Two peaks tentatively identified as
`mm and
`out)
`and several other leachables were detected at levels above the identification and
`qualification threshold of> Lug/g. Report $00245-R (Appendix 4) provides a
`safety evaluation ofthese compounds. Whether the origin ofthese leachables has
`been traced is unclear. Though a safety report has been provided, given the
`plethora ofleachables, a toxicology consult should be considered to ensure that
`the levels ofthe various leachables pose no safety risk. Also, it should be
`determined during review ifthe leachable(s) should be included in the DP
`specification with appropriate acceptance limits.
`m” Whether residual levels
`. The container closures are
`"a, are controlled should be checked.
`of mm and
`. The carton and container labels mentions “Sample-Not for sale”. Whether this is
`acceptable or should the label specifically state “Physician sample ” may be
`discussed with Clinical/DMEPA.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`The NBA does notprovide the color mock ofthe container and carton labels. This
`should be communicated in the 74-day letter to the company.
`
`Reference ID: 3164499
`
`

`

`IQA-NDA 203168
`
`Early action needed:
`
`1) Reviewer should evaluate items identified (in italics) in this IQA.
`
`Comments for 74-day letter
`
`The following comments will be communicated to the company.
`
`1. Please submit color mock of the carton and container labels
`2. The drug product specification proposes a test for weight loss and sodium sulfite but
`does not provide for acceptance criterion. Please propose a suitable acceptance limit
`for this test.
`
`Comments and Recommendation:
`
`Based on the perusal of this NDA, it is determined to be complete and therefore filable
`from CMC perspective. Dr. Rao Kambhampati is assigned to review this NDA.
`
`
`Balajee Shanmugam
`CMC Lead
`
`
`
`Rapti Madurawe, Ph.D.
`Branch Chief
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`See DARRTS
`
`
` Date
`
`
`
`
`See DARRTS
`
` Date
`
`Reference ID: 3164499
`
`5
`
`

`

`IND 60295
`Meeting Minutes
`Type B
`
`Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products
`
`
`MEMORANDUM OF MEETING MINUTES
`
`
`Meeting Type:
`Meeting Category:
`
`Meeting Date and Time: August 29, 2011, Start: 9:05, End: 9:25
`Meeting Location:
`Bldg 22, Room 1313
`
`Type B

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket