throbber

`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`202895Orig1s000
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 202-895
`
`PrezistaTM
`
`(darunavir)
`
`Oral Suspension
`100 mg per mL
`
`Tibotec, Inc.
`
`Mark R. Seggel
`ONDQA
`
`Division of New Drug Quality Assessment II
`Branch V
`
`Reference ID: 3022480
`
`

`

`
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Table of Contents .....................................................................................................2
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet.................................................................................3
`
`The Executive Summary .........................................................................................6
`
`1. Recommendations ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
`
`A. Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability ....................................................................... 6
`
`B. Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post-Marketing) Commitments. Agreements. and/or Risk
`Management Steps. if Approvable ................................................................................................... 6
`
`H. Summary of Chemistry Assessments ....................................................................................................................... 6
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s) ............................................................. 6
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used.......................................................... 8
`
`C. Basis for Approvability or Not-Approval Recommendation ............................................................ 9
`
`111. Admm'islrative ...................................................................................................................................................... 10
`
`A. Reviewer’s Signature ...................................................................................................................... 10
`
`B. Endorsement Block ......................................................................................................................... 10
`
`C. CC Block ........................................................................................................................................ 10
`
`Chemistry Assessment ........................................................................................... 1 1
`
`1. Review of Common Technical Document-Quality (Ctd-Q) Module 3.2: Body of Data ...................................... 11
`
`S
`
`P
`
`DRUG SUBSTANCE ................................................................................. 11
`
`DRUG PRODUCT ...................................................................................... 11
`
`R5 Control of Drug Product ...................................................................................................................................... 11
`
`P. 5 .1
`
`Specification .......................................................................................................................... l 1
`
`R7 Container Closure System .................................................................................................................................... 12
`
`II. Review Of Common Technical Document-Quality (Ctd-Q) Module 1 ............................................................... 15
`
`A. Labeling & Package Inseit ............................................................................................................. 15
`
`111. List Of Deficiencies To Be Communicated.......................................................................................................... 20
`
`Reference ID: 3022480
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`1. NDA 202-895
`
`2. REVIEW #: 2
`
`3. REVIEW DATE: 28-SEP-201 1
`
`4. REVIEWER: Mark R. Seggel
`
`5. PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS:
`
`Previous Documents (eC'ID)
`(0000)
`Original submission
`(0003)
`Amendment (mfg. facilities)
`Amendment (response to info. request) (0019)
`Amendment (response to info. request) (0024)
`Amendment (response to info. request) (0025)
`
`6. SUBMISSION(S) BEING REVIEWED:
`
`Submission; 5) Reviewed (eC’ID)
`(0030)
`Amendment (labeling)
`(0031)
`Amendment (CMC)
`Amendment (alternative dosing pipette) (0032)
`Amendment (labeling)
`(0033)
`Amendment (labeling)
`(0034)
`Amendment (alternative dosing pipette) (0035)
`Amendment (labeling)
`(0036)
`Amendment (syringe graphics)
`(0037)
`Amendment (labeling)
`(0040)
`
`7. NANIE & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:
`
`Document Date
`29—MAR—201 l
`26-APR—201 l
`29—JUL-201 1
`1 8-AUG-20 l l
`19-AUG—201 1
`
`Document Date
`08-SEP—201 1
`09—SEP—20 l l
`09—SEP—201 1
`09-SEP-201 1
`12-SEP-20 1 1
`14-SEP-201 1
`2 l -SEP-201 1
`22-SEP-201 1
`28-SEP-201 1
`
`920 US. Highway 202.
`Address: PO. Box 300
`Raritan. NJ 08869—0602
`
`908-707-3451
`
`Re resentative(s)' Charles Zezza. PhD
`p
`' Director. Global Re lato Affairs
`
`8. DRUG PRODUCT NAME/CODE/I‘YPE:
`
`a) Proprietary Name: PrezistaTM
`b) Non-Proprietary Name (USAN): Darunavir
`c) Code Name/#: 'IMC 1 14 (TMC114 ethanolate); R319064; JNJ-25875382; 54179
`W": 206361-99-1
`(1) CAS Registry Number: ethanolate: 635728-49-3;
`
`Reference ID: 3022480
`
`Page 3 of 20
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`e) Chem. Type/Submission Priority:
`i. Chem. Type: 3
`ii. Submission Priority: P
`
`9. LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBMISSION: 505(b)
`
`10. PHARMACOL. CATEGORY: Antiretroviral/Systemic/I-IIV/Protease inhibitor
`
`(7030220)
`
`11. DOSAGE FORM: Suspension
`
`12. STRENGTH/POTENCY: 100 mg per mL
`
`13. ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Oral
`
`14. Rx/OTC DISPENSED:
`
`_X_Rx
`
`OTC
`
`15. SPOTS (SPECIAL PRODUCTS ON—LINE TRACKlNG SYSTEM)
`SPOTS product — Form Completed
`
`X Not a SPOTS product
`
`16. CHEMICAL NAME, STRUCTURAL FORMULA, MOLECULAR FORMULA,
`MOLECULAR WEIGHT
`
`Chemical Names:
`
`[(lS,2R)—3-[[(4—aminophenyl)sulfonyl](2—methylpropyl)amino]-2—hydroxy—l—(phenylmethyl)—
`1.
`propyl]-carbamic acid (3R,3aS, 6aR)-hexahydrofuro[2,3-b]furan-3-yl ester
`2. Carbamic acid, [(1S,2R)-3-[[(4-amin0phenyl)sulfonyl](2-methylpropyl)amino]-2-hydroxy-l-
`(phenyhnethyl)propyl]—, (3R,3aS,6aR)—hexahydrofi1ro[2,3-b]furan-3—yl ester
`
`USAN/INN: Danmavir
`
`Structural Formula:
`
`Molecular Formula and Molecular Weight:
`Darunavir
`C27H37N307S
`Darunavir ethanolate
`C27H37N307S-C2H60
`
`547.66
`593.73
`
`"”“’ by weight)
`
`Note: The labeled strength, 100 mg/mL, is based on the weight of danmavir.
`
`Reference ID: 3022480
`
`Page 4 of 20
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`17. RELATED/SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
`
`A. DMFs:
`
`DNIF #
`
`
`
`CED CODE1
`
`HOLDER
`
`18825
`
`H
`
`anssen
`I' harmaceutica
`|
`(J&J PR&D)
`
`II arunavir API
`
`1
`
`Adequate
`
`3 l-AUG—201 l
`
`overing M (4)
`». d particle size
`ontrol
`
`(b) (4)
`
`
`
`Action codes for DMF Table:
`1 — DMF Reviewed
`Other codes indicate why the DMF was not reviewed, as follows:
`2 —Type 1 DMF
`3 — Reviewed previously and no revision since last review
`4 — Sufficient information in application
`5 — Authority to reference not granted
`6 — DMF not available
`7 — Other (explain under "Comments")
`2 Adequate, Inadequate, or N/A (There is enough data in the application therefore the DMF did not need to be reviewed)
`
`B. Other Documents:
`APPLICATION NUT/[BER
`
`NDA 21-976
`
`18. STATUS
`
`SUBJECT
`
`Darlmavir Tablets: A roved 23-JUN—2006
`
`
`CONSULTS/ CMC
`DATE
`RECOMMENDATION
`RELATED REVIEWS
`_ /A —
`O I'erall Recommendation: Acc table
`20-MAY-2011
`
`_ /A —
`0NDQA Biopharmaceutics |
`terim dissolution test acceptance
`01-SEP-2011
`riterion acc otable
`:3
`
`NC
`ethods Validation
`
`I MEPA
`
`i
`| abeling revisions recommended:
`se of standard oral syringe and bottle
`
`31—AUG—2011
`
`da tor/ .lu recommended.
`
`REVIEWER
`
`II . Smith
`
`|
`
`I
`
`. Seggel
`
`. Holmes
`
`
`
`I abelin. revisions recommended
`
`28-SEP-2011
`
`“
`
`_— - Se e1
`Q uali Microbiolo 3
`I' ecommend a o roval
`. Metcalf
`
`19. GOAL DATES
`
`PDUFA Goal:
`
`30—SEP-2011
`
`Reference ID: 3022480
`
`Page 5 of 20
`
`

`

`
`
`Executive Summary Section
`
`The Chemistry Review for NDA 202-895
`
`The Executive Summam
`
`I. Recommendations
`
`A. Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability
`
`This NDA, as amended, has provided sufficient information to assure identity, strength,
`quality, purity, potency and bioavailability of the drug product. The labels have
`adequate information as required. The issues regarding the dosing device and labeling
`identified in Chemistry Review #1 have been resolved. The Office of Compliance has
`issued an overall recommendation of ‘Acceptable’ based on the satisfactory cGMP
`status of the manufacturing facilities. Therefore, from the CMC perspective, this NDA
`is recommended for approval.
`
`B. Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post-Marketing) Commitments, Agreements, and/or
`Risk Management Steps, if Approvable
`
`Tibotec and the ONDQA Biophalmaceutics review team have agreed to the
`establishment of an Interim dissolution test acceptance criterion. A Q of {23% at 45
`minutes will be in place while Tibotec continues to collect dissolution profiles at
`release and on stability for one (1) year following approval. Per a Post—Marketing
`Commitment, Tibotec will report the results and propose a final regulatory specification
`for review. See this reviewer’s Biopharmaceutics review for background information.
`
`II. Summary of Chemistry Assessments
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s)
`
`“(4), white to off-white
`PREZISTA (darlmavir) Oral Suspension, 100 mg/mL is a
`opaque, strawberry-cream flavored liquid containing the equivalent of 100 mg
`danmavir per mL. The suspension is supplied in amber—colored multiple-dose bottles
`containing 200 mL of the liquid. Note that while the product is manufactured from
`darlmavir ethanolate, in aqueous systems such as the suspension, the ethanolate
`undergoes conversion to the iso-structural hydrate. This interconversion does not affect
`bioavailability.
`
`Darunavir is currently available in tablet form (NDA 21-976). The first approved tablet
`strength was 300 mg (AP 23-JUN-2006). Subsequently, a 600 mg tablet was approved
`(25-FEB-2008); this is the current RLD. A 400 mg tablet was approved on 21-OCT-
`2008. This was followed by approval of 75 mg and 150 mg tablets on l8—DEC-2008.
`The 300 mg tablet is no longer marketed in the US. Darunavir oral suspension was
`developed in order to address the needs of pediatric patients unable to swallow Prezista
`
`Reference ID: 3022480
`
`Page 6 of 20
`
`

`

`
`
`Executive Summary Section
`
`(darunavir) Tablets and to provide a product suitable for young children (age 3-6
`years).
`
`Initially, development focused on a (4,mg/mL formulation, but a 100 mg/mL product
`was preferable, allowing a smaller volume to provide the required dose.
`
`The overall drug product quality control strategy encompasses everything from drug
`substance characteristics, excipient selection and controls, product composition,
`manufacturing process controls, release testing, container-closure system
`characteristics, and stability testing.
`
`Inactive ingredients in darlmavir oral suspension consist of hydroxypropyl cellulose
`M“) microcrystalline cellulose and
`(mu) (
`(m4);
`selected to give a product with
`
`(m4)
`(m4)
`
`(m0), citric acid monohydrate,
`sucralose, masking flavor, strawberry cream flavor (darunavir has an
`(m4)
`(m4) hydrochloric acid and purified water. All are commonly used in
`oral formulations and are of suitable quality for use in this product. All except the
`flavors are controlled in accordance with compendial monographs.
`
`The manufacturing process is relatively straightforward; essentially a
`
`mm
`
`The regulatory specification for Prezista Oral Suspension includes tests for identity,
`assay, chromatographic impurities, pH (critical for optimal
`(mu) efiectiveness),
`deliverable volume, and dissolution rate (an interim acceptance criterion for dissolution
`has been established; see this reviewer’s ONDQA Biopharmaceutics review of the
`dissolution test method and data). The specification also includes an assay of
`methylparaben,
`(mar
`
`M“),
`Darlmavir oral suspension is packagedin an amber glass bottle with
`M’ cap. This container—closure system provides adequate protection of the
`product (including light protection, as some components of the flavors may be light
`sensitive). The
`(ma) closure provides an appropriate level of safety. A 6-mL
`oral syringe and bottle adapter are included in the carton with each bottle.
`
`(II) (4)
`
`The stability of three registration batches of darunavir oral suspension at 25°C/40% RH
`has been followed through 12 months. No significant changes in product quality
`attributes are noted, although there is a slight decrease in percent dissolved at 30
`minutes (see ONDQA Biophannaceutics review). These studies are ongoing to
`confirm the proposed 24-month expiration dating period of the drug product.
`
`Reference ID: 3022480
`
`Page 7 of 20
`
`

`

`
`
`Executive Summary Section
`
`Storage lmder refrigeration and freezing conditions were conducted. Refiigeration can
`result in precipitation of methylparaben, and thus should be avoided. Temperature
`cycling studies were also conducted. No adverse effects were noted. Initial results
`from an ongoing simulated in—use study indicate that repeated opening of the bottle and
`removal of a dose does not adversely affect the quality of the product.
`
`an“) effectiveness testing demonstrated that the product meets
`(m4) criteria for oral products made with an aqueous base. Adequate product
`the
`quality microbiology controls have been established, and include tests for
`(mu)
`
`Quality Microbiology review for details.)
`
`.
`.
`Damnav1r API 1s
`
`(see Product
`
`4
`(m )
`
`). The chemistry, manufacture and control (CMC) of darunavir
`ethanolate drug substance used in the manufacture of both damnavir tablets and
`danmavir oral suspension is documented in Janssen Pharmaceutica’s DMF 18825.
`Darlmavir is only very slightly
`(m4) . Other than a
`(am)
`
`Drug substance particle size, although not particularly critical to bioavailability, can
`«and Hence, the drug substance is
`mm
`in the manufacture of the suspension.
`
`the CMC is the same.
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used
`
`Prezista is indicated for the treatment of HIV-1 infections in adult patients. It is also
`indicated for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in pediatric patients 3 years of age and
`older. Prezista must be co—administered with ritonavir and with other antiretroviral
`
`agents. Darunavir is taken twice daily with food. In patients weighing 10 to 15 kg (22
`to 33 pounds), the weight-based dose is {2; mg/kg (equivalent to
`«mo
`mL of the oral suspensionD. Dosing of patients greater than 15 kg is also described.
`The maximum dose of 800 mg (8 mL; for adults unable to swallow the tablets) should
`be taken as two 4 mL administrations with the included oral dosing syringe.
`
`(m4)
`Prezista Oral Suspension is supplied in amber glass bottles with
`caps. A 6-mL
`M“) oral syringe and bottle adapter will be supplied with the
`bottle. (Note: The originally proposed
`(m4) will not be used with product in
`the US.) The patient or caregiver will press fit the adapter into the bottle neck. The tip
`of the syringe is inserted into the adapter and the bottle inverted. The required dose is
`withdrawn into the syringe. The syringe is removed from the adapter and the dose
`administered.
`
`Reference ID: 3022480
`
`Page 8 of 20
`
`

`

`
`
`Executive Summary Section
`
`Prezista Oral Suspension is labeled for storage at 25°C (77°F); with excursions
`permitted to 15°-30°C (59°-86°F). The label also indicates that the product should not
`be refrigerated or frozen. Exposure to excessive heat is to be avoided. The suspension
`is to be stored in the original container, and should be shaken well before each usage.
`
`C. Basis for Approvability or Not-Approval Recommendation
`
`The applicant has provided sufficient information on raw material controls,
`manufacturing processes and process controls, and adequate specifications for assuring
`consistent product quality of the drug substance and drug product. The applicant also
`has provided sufficient stability information on the drug product to assure strength,
`purity, and quality of the drug product during the expiration dating period.
`
`The proposed dissolution test acceptance criterion, Q= 223% at 30 minutes was
`considered unacceptable. While the available release and stability data suggest that Q =
`33% at 30 minutes is appropriate (although some Stage 2 testing may be necessary),
`Tibotec concludes that an unacceptably high overall failure rate will occur at the
`proposed 24-month expiry (see Biopharmaceutics review). An Interim acceptance
`criterion of Q = 8% at 45 minutes has been established. This will ensure that a mean
`of at least 3% of the drug product is dissolved. A Post-Marketing Commitment
`(PMC) addresses the requirements for collecting data for one year and proposal of a
`final regulatory acceptance criterion.
`
`ma)
`Prezista Oral Suspension is supplied in amber glass bottles with
`caps. A dosing device is supplied with each bottle of oral suspension. The originally
`proposed
`(”"4” reviewed in Chemistry Review #1 will not be used with
`product in the US. DMEPA determined that the design of that
`m“) was inconsistent
`with what patients in the US. are familiar with and was likely to lead to confusion and
`dosing errors. An alternative oral syringe and adapter was subsequently proposed and
`is docmnented in the present review. A 6-mL
`(m4) oral syringe and bottle
`adapter will be supplied with the bottle. The materials of construction comply with {'3
`’ which
`(5) w
`Dosing accuracy of the oral syringe
`
`is within i5% across the dosage range of 2.6 mL to 6 mL. Reference is also made to
`Type HI DMF
`(hm) covering the oral syringe and bottle adapter. DMEPA finds the
`proposed oral syringe acceptable.
`
`Labeling for this product consists of the bottle label, carton, package insert, patient
`information, directions for use (lacking at the time Chemistry Review # was completed)
`and syringe graphics. All labels have the required Description, How Supplied and
`Storage information. The trademark, Prezista, was previously found acceptable for
`Tibotec’s formulations of darunavir (i.e., Prezista Tablets). DMEPA and DRISK have
`provided reconnnendations for revisions to all components of the labeling. For
`example, it was recommended that the strength be expressed as “100 mg per mL” rather
`than “100 mg/mL”. In addition, DMEPA recommended that the storage and handling
`statements (e.g., ‘Do not refrigerate or freeze’) be made more prominent. See DMEPA
`
`Reference ID: 3022480
`
`Page 9 of 20
`
`

`

`
`
`Executive Summary Section
`
`review dated 31—AUG—201 l and DRISK reviews dated 06—SEP—2011 and 28—Sep—20] 1.
`From the CMC perspective, all labeling recommendations made to date are acceptable.
`
`Finally, all manufacturing, packaging and testing facilities have acceptable site
`recommendations. An overall recommendation of Acceptable was issued by the Office
`of Compliance on 20-MAY-2011 (see Chemistry Review #1).
`
`III. Administrative
`
`A. Reviewer’s Signature
`
`{see electronic signature page}
`
`B. Endorsement Block
`
`{see electronic signature page}
`
`C. CC Block
`
`{see darrts}
`
`10 Page(s) has been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`Reference ID: 3022480
`
`Page 10 of 20
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`MARK R SEGGEL
`09/29/2011
`
`RAPTI D MADURAWE
`09/29/2011
`
`Reference ID: 3022480
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 202-895
`
`.
`Prelista
`
`TM
`
`(darunavir)
`
`Oral Suspension
`100 mg/mL
`
`Tibotec, Inc.
`
`Mark R. Seggel
`ONDQA
`
`Division of New Drug Quality Assessment II
`Branch V
`
`Reference ID: 3010703
`
`

`

`
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Table of Contents .....................................................................................................2
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet.................................................................................5
`
`The Executive Summary .........................................................................................8
`
`I. Recommendations ..................................................................................................................................................... 8
`
`A. Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability ....................................................................... 8
`
`B. Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post-Marketing) Commitments, Agreements. and/or Risk
`Management Steps. if Approvable ................................................................................................... 8
`
`II. Summary of Chemistry Assessments ....................................................................................................................... 8
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s) ............................................................. 8
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used........................................................ 10
`
`C. Basis for Approvability or Not-Approval Recommendation .......................................................... 11
`
`HI. Administrative ...................................................................................................................................................... 12
`
`A. Reviewer’s Signature ...................................................................................................................... 12
`
`B. Endorsement Block ......................................................................................................................... 12
`
`C. CC Block ........................................................................................................................................ 12
`
`Chemistry Assessment ........................................................................................... 13
`
`1. Review of Common Technical Document-Quality (Ctd-Q) Module 3.2: Body of Data ...................................... 13
`
`S
`
`DRUG SUBSTANCE ................................................................................. 13
`
`8.1 General Information ............................................................................................................................................ 13
`
`S. 1.1
`
`Nomenclature ........................................................................................................................ 13
`
`S. 1.2
`
`Structure ................................................................................................................................ 14
`
`8.1.3
`
`General Properties ................................................................................................................. 14
`
`82 Manufacture.......................................................................................................................................................... 15
`
`8.2.1
`
`Manufacturers ...................................................................................................................... 15
`
`8.3 Characterization.................................................................................................................................................... 16
`
`8.4 Control of Drug Substance ................................................................................................................................... 16
`
`8.4.1
`
`Specification .......................................................................................................................... 16
`
`Reference ID: 301 0703
`
`

`

`'"fl‘t
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW #1
`
`'"fi'fi
`
`S.4.2
`
`Analytical Procedures ........................................................................................................... 17
`
`8.4.3
`
`Validation of Analytical Procedures ..................................................................................... 17
`
`8.4.4
`
`Batch Analyses ...................................................................................................................... 17
`
`8.4.5
`
`Justification of Specification ................................................................................................. 17
`
`8.5 Reference Standards or Materials ......................................................................................................................... 17
`
`8.6 Container Closure System .................................................................................................................................... 17
`
`8.7 Stability ................................................................................................................................................................ 17
`
`P
`
`DRUG PRODUCT ...................................................................................... 18
`
`RI
`
`Description and Composition of the Drug Product ......................................................................................... 18
`
`P2 Pharmaceutical Development ............................................................................................................................... 19
`
`P21
`
`Components of the Drug Product .......................................................................................... l9
`
`Drug Substance .......................................................................................................................................... l9
`P.2.l.l
`Excipients .................................................................................................................................................. 20
`P.2.1.2
`P22
`Drug Product ......................................................................................................................... 21
`
`Formulation Development ......................................................................................................................... 21
`P.2.2.l
`Over-ages .................................................................................................................................................... 22
`P.2.2.2
`Physicochemical and Biological Properties ............................................................................................... 22
`P.2.2.3
`Attachment A: Nanotechnology product evaluating questions: ..................................................................................... 22
`P23
`Manufacturing Process Development ................................................................................... 23
`
`P.2.4
`
`Container Closure System ..................................................................................................... 24
`
`P25
`
`Microbiological Attributes .................................................................................................... 24
`
`P26
`
`Compatibility......................................................................................................................... 24
`
`P3 Manufacture.......................................................................................................................................................... 25
`
`P.3.l
`
`Manufacturers ....................................................................................................................... 25
`
`R32
`
`Batch Formula ....................................................................................................................... 25
`
`P33
`
`Description of Manufacturing Process and Process Controls ............................................... 26
`
`P.3.4
`
`Controls of Critical Steps and Intermediates......................................................................... 28
`
`PA Control of Excipients............................................................................................................................................ 29
`
`P5 Control of Drug Product ....................................................................................................................................... 30
`
`P.5.1
`
`Specification(s) ..................................................................................................................... 30
`
`P.5.2
`
`Analytical Procedures ........................................................................................................... 31
`
`P53
`
`Validation of Analytical Procedures ..................................................................................... 33
`
`P54
`
`Batch Analyses ...................................................................................................................... 34
`
`P55
`
`Characterization of Impurities ............................................................................................... 34
`
`P56
`
`Justification of Specification(s) ............................................................................................. 35
`
`Reference ID: 301 0703
`
`

`

`“"E'fi
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW #1
`
`”1"?
`
`R6 Reference Standards or Materials ......................................................................................................................... 38
`
`R7 Container Closure System .................................................................................................................................... 38
`
`R8 Stability ................................................................................................................................................................ 40
`
`P.8.l
`
`Stability Summary and Conclusion ....................................................................................... 40
`
`R82
`
`Postapproval Stability Protocol and Stability Commitment .................................................. 41
`
`P.8.3
`
`Stability Data ......................................................................................................................... 42
`
`A APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................................................... 44
`
`Al
`
`A2
`
`A3
`
`Facilities and Equipment (biotech only) ............................................................................... 44
`
`Adventitious Agents Safety Evaluation ................................................................................ 44
`
`Novel Excipients ................................................................................................................... 44
`
`R REGIONAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................ 44
`
`R1 Executed Batch Records ............................................................................................................... 44
`
`R2 Comparability Protocols ............................................................................................................... 44
`
`R3 Methods Validation Package ........................................................................................................ 44
`
`II. Review Of Common Technical Document-Quality (Ctd-Q) Module 1 ............................................................... 45
`
`A. Labeling & Package Insert ............................................................................................................. 45
`
`B. Environmental Assessment Or Claim Of Categorical Exclusion ................................................... 49
`
`111. List OfDeficiencies To Be Communicated.......................................................................................................... 50
`
`Iv. Miscellaneous Attachments .................................................................................................................................. 52
`
`Attachment B. EES Report .................................................................................................................. 52
`
`Reference ID: 301 0703
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`1. NDA 202—895
`
`2. REVIEW #: 1
`
`3. REVIEW DATE: 06—SEP—2011
`
`4. REVIEWER: Mark R. Seggel
`
`5. PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS:
`
`Previous Documents
`
`Not Applicable
`
`6. SUBMISSION(S) BEING REVIEWED:
`
`Submissions 5! Reviewed (eCTD)
`(0000)
`Original submission
`(0003)
`Amendment (mfg. facilities)
`Amendment (response to info. request) (0019)
`Amendment (response to info. request) (0024)
`Amendment (response to info. request) (0025)
`
`7. NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:
`
`Document Date
`
`Document Date
`29—MAR—201 1
`26-APR-201 l
`29-JUL-201 1
`1 8-AUG-20 1 1
`19-AUG-20 1 1
`
`Address:
`
`920 US. Highway 202
`P.O. Box 300
`Raritan. NJ 08869-0602
`
`Representat1ve(s). Director Global Re . to Aflairs 908-707-3451
`
`.
`
`_ Charles Zezza. PhD
`
`8. DRUG PRODUCT NAME/CODE/I'YPE:
`
`a) Proprietary Name: PrezistaTM
`b) Non-Proprietary Name (USAN): Darunavir
`c) Code Name/#: TMC114 (TMC114 ethanolate);
`d) CAS Registry Number: xxx
`e) Chem. Type/Submission Priority:
`i. Chem. Type: 3
`ii- Submission Priority: P
`
`9.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket