throbber

`NDA 202788/S-021
`
`
`
`
`SUPPLEMENT APPROVAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` BTcP Pharma, LLC
`
` c/o West Therapeutics Development, LLC
`
` 1033 Skokie Boulevard
`
` Suite 620
` Northbrook, IL 60062
`
`
`
`Attention: Mahlaqa Patel
`
`
`Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance
`
`
`
`
`Dear Ms. Patel:
`
`Please refer to your supplemental new drug application (sNDA) dated and received July
`
`
`
`25, 2019, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
`
`
`(FDCA) for Subsys (fentanyl sublingual spray).
`
`
`We also refer to our REMS MODIFICATION NOTIFICATION letter, dated March 27,
`
`2019, informing you that the Transmucosal Immediate Release Fentanyl (TIRF) Risk
`
`
`Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) must be modified to ensure that the benefits
`
`of the drug outweigh its risks. This determination was based on information contained in
`the REMS assessment reports suggesting many patients prescribed a TIRF medicine
`may not have been opioid-tolerant when they received a new prescription for a TIRF
`
`medicine, as well as recommendations from the August 3, 2018, joint meeting of the
`
`Drug Safety and Risk Management, and the Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products
`
`advisory committees.
`
`
`This supplemental new drug application proposes REMS modifications required under
`
`
`
`section 505-1 of the FDCA, consistent with those outlined in the March 27, 2019, letter.
`
`
`We have completed our review of this supplemental application. It is approved, effective
`
`
`on the date of this letter.
`
`
`RISK EVALUATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGY (REMS) REQUIREMENTS
`
`The REMS for TIRF products, of which Subsys is a member, was originally approved on
`
`
`
`
`December 28, 2011, and the most recent REMS modification was approved on
`
`
`
`September 7, 2017. The REMS consists of a Medication Guide, elements to assure
`safe use, an implementation system, and a timetable for submission of assessments of
`
`the REMS.
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`
`
` on
`
`
`
` NDA 202788/S-021
`
` Page 2
`
`
`In order to ensure the benefits of Subsys outweigh its risks, we determined that you
`
`
`
`were required to make the REMS modifications outlined in our REMS Modification letter
`
`
`dated March 27, 2019.
`
`
`Your proposed modified REMS, submitted to Drug Master File (DMF)
`
`December 7, 2020, and appended to this letter, is approved.
`
`
`
`
`The modifications to the approved REMS must be fully implemented within 120
`
`calendar days of the date of this letter.
`
`
`
`The REMS uses a shared system for the elements to assure safe use, an
`
`implementation system, and a timeable for assessments of the REMS. This shared
`
`system, known as the TIRF REMS program, currently includes products listed on the
`
`FDA REMS, website, available at:
`https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/rems/index.cfm?event=RemsDetails.page&
`REMS=60
`
`
`Other products may be added in the future if additional NDAs or ANDAs are approved.
`
`
`The timetable for submission of assessments of the REMS must be revised to 12
`
`months from the date of the approval of this REMS modification (December 23, 2020)
`
`and annually thereafter.
`
`
`The revised REMS assessment plan must include, but is not limited to, the following:
`
`
`
`Program Outreach and Communication
`
`
`1. Communication (1-year assessment post-modification approval only)
`
`
`a. Sources of the distribution list(s) for the Dear Healthcare Provider Letter to
`
`
`healthcare providers likely to prescribe TIRF medicines
`
`b. Number of targeted healthcare providers who can prescribe
`
`
`
`c. The number of Dear Healthcare Provider letters sent by date(s), medical
`
`
`specialty, and method of distribution.
`
`i. The number and percentage of emailed letters successfully
`
`
`delivered, opened, and unopened.
`
`ii. The number and percentage of mailed letters successfully delivered
`
`
`or returned as undeliverable.
`
`iii. The number and percentage of faxed letters successfully delivered
`
`
`or returned as undeliverable.
`
`
`d. The number of professional societies sent the Dear Healthcare Provider
`
`
`Letter by date(s) and method of distribution. In addition, include which
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 202788/S-021
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`
`professional societies distributed the Dear Healthcare Provider Letter or
`
`the content of the letter to their respective members.
`
`
`e. Sources of the distribution list(s) for the Dear Pharmacy Letter to inpatient
`
`
`
`and outpatient pharmacies that dispense Schedule II drugs and may be
`involved in dispensing TIRF medicines
`
`f. The number of pharmacies sent the Dear Pharmacy Letter date(s), type of
`
`
`
`pharmacy, and by method of distribution
`
`
`i. The number and percentage of emailed letters successfully
`
`
`delivered, opened, and unopened.
`
`ii. The number and percentage of mailed letters successfully delivered
`
`
`or returned as undeliverable.
`
`iii. The number and percentage of faxed letters successfully delivered
`
`
`or returned as undeliverable.
`
`g. The number of professional societies sent the Dear Pharmacy by dates(s)
`
`
`and by method of distribution. In addition, include which professional
`
`societies distributed the Dear Pharmacy Letter or the content of the letter
`
`
`
`to their respective members.
`
`h. Date(s) and name(s) of Professional meetings where TIRF REMS
`
`
`
`materials were disseminated or displayed.
`
`
`Program Implementation and Operations
`
`
`2. REMS Program Implementation (1-year assessment post-modification
`
`
`approval only)
`
`a. Date when the modified TIRF REMS website went live and was fully
`
`
`operational
`
`b. Date when healthcare providers who can prescribe could become certified
`
`in the modified REMS
`
`c. Date when pharmacies could become certified in the modified REMS
`
`
`d. Date when patients could be enrolled in the modified REMS
`
`
`e. Date when distributors/wholesalers could be registered in the modified
`
`REMS
`
`f. Date when the REMS Call Center for the modified TIRF REMS program
`
`
`
`went live and was fully operational
`
`3. REMS Certification and Enrollment Statistics (provide previous, current,
`
`and cumulative reporting periods)
`
`a. Patients (number and percent)
`
`
`i. For the one-year assessment report only:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`NDA 202788/S-021
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`
`1) Patients previously enrolled in the TIRF REMS Access
`
`
`program (i.e. enrolled prior to implementation of the modified
`REMS)
`
`2) Patients re-enrolled (i.e., previously enrolled in the TIRF
`
`REMS Access program and transitioned to new program)
`
`ii. Newly enrolled into the new program
`
`
`iii. Active patients (i.e., received at least one dispensation of a TIRF
`
`product during the reporting period)
`
`iv. For metrics 3.a.i. through iii, stratify by demographics (age, gender,
`
`
`
`ethnicity, race, and geographic region [as defined by US Census]),
`
`around-the-clock opioid(s) (moiety, daily dose, and duration of
`
`greater than seven days), medical reasons related to pain (cancer
`
`
`or non-cancer pain), TIRF medicine use in the prior six months, and
`concomitant benzodiazepines and other central nervous system
`
`(CNS) depressants
`
`v. A summary of the methods of patient enrollment (e.g., online, fax)
`
`
`
`
`vi. Number of patients who were unable to become enrolled,
`
`
`
`accompanied by a summary of the reasons they were unable to be
`
`enrolled
`
`b. Healthcare Providers who can Prescribe (number and percent)
`
`
`i.
`For the one-year assessment report only:
`
`
`1) Healthcare providers who can prescribe who previously
`
`
`certified in the TIRF REMS Access program (i.e. enrolled
`prior to implementation of the modified REMS)
`
`2) Healthcare providers who can prescribe who re-certified (i.e.,
`
`previously certified in the TIRF REMS Access program and
`transitioned to new program)
`
`ii. Healthcare providers who can prescribe who are newly certified
`
`
`iii. Active prescribers (i.e. who have prescribed a TIRF at least once
`
`during the reporting period)
`
`For metrics 3.a.i. through iii, stratify by credentials, (e.g., Doctor of
`
`Medicine, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine, Nurse Practitioner,
`
`Physician Assistant, Other), medical specialty (e.g., Pain
`
`Medicine, Oncology, Internal Medicine, Other, etc.) and
`geographic region [as defined by US Census])
`
`
`
`v. A summary of the methods of healthcare provider certification
`
`
`(e.g., online, fax)
`
`
`iv.
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`NDA 202788/S-021
`
`Page 5
`
`
`
`
`vii.
`
`
`vi. Number of healthcare providers who can prescribe who were
`
`
`unable to become certified, accompanied by a summary of the
`
`reasons they were unable to be certified
`
`For the 2-year assessment report, conduct an outreach to
`healthcare providers that did not re-certify in the REMS to
`
`ascertain the reasons why they did not re-certify. Submit the
`
`methodology protocol 120 days prior to initiating the outreach.
`
`c. Pharmacies (number and percent)
`
`
`For the one-year assessment report only:
`i.
`
`
`1) Pharmacies previously certified in the TIRF REMS Access
`
`
`program (i.e. enrolled prior to implementation of the modified
`REMS)
`
`2) Pharmacies re-certified (i.e., previously certified in the TIRF
`
`REMS Access program and transitioned to new program)
`
`ii. Pharmacies newly certified into the new program
`
`
`iii. Active pharmacies (i.e., have dispensed a TIRF at least once
`
`during the reporting period)
`
`For metrics 3.a.i. through iii, stratify by pharmacy type (inpatient,
`
`
`chain, independent [retail, mail, institutional], or closed system
`
`[provide identity of closed system entities]) and by geographic
`
`region [as defined by US Census])
`
`v. A summary of the methods of pharmacy certification (e.g., online,
`
`
`
`fax)
`
`vi. Number of pharmacies that were unable to become certified,
`
`
`
`accompanied by a summary of the reasons they were unable to
`
`be certified
`
`For the 2-year REMS assessment report, conduct an outreach to
`pharmacies that did not re-certify in the REMS to ascertain the
`reasons why they did not re-certify. Submit the methodology
`
`
`protocol 120 days prior to initiating the outreach.
`
`d. Wholesalers-Distributors (number)
`
`
`i. Previously enrolled (i.e. enrolled prior to implementation of the
`
`modified REMS)
`
`ii. Re-enrolled (i.e., enrolled prior to implementation of the modified
`
`REMS and transitioned to new program)
`
`iii. Newly enrolled into the new program
`
`
`iv. Active (i.e., distributed a TIRF product during the reporting period)
`
`
`
`iv.
`
`
`vii.
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 202788/S-021
`
` Page 6
`
`
`
`4. TIRF Utilization Data (provide previous, current, and cumulative reporting
`
`periods)
`
`a. Number of prescriptions/transactions authorized for dispensing and those
`
`
`dispensed stratified by:
`
`i. Prescriber specialty, degree/credentials, and geographic region.
`
`
`ii. Pharmacy type (specialty, central fill, inpatient, chain,
`
`
`
`independent [retail, mail, institutional], or closed system [provide
`identity of closed system entities])
`
`iii. Patient demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, race, and
`
`
`geographic region [as defined by US Census])
`
`
`Identify the source of this information
`iv.
`
`
`
`5. REMS Infrastructure and Performance (provide previous, current, and
`
`cumulative reporting periods)
`
`a. REMS Website
`
`
`i. Number of visits and unique visits to the REMS website
`
`
`
`ii. Number of REMS materials downloaded or printed for each
`
`
`
`material
`
`b. REMS program Call Center Report
`
`
`i. Number of contacts by stakeholder type (patient/caregiver,
`
`
`
`healthcare provider, pharmacy, wholesalers/distributors, other)
`
`ii. A table summarizing the most frequently asked questions (e.g.,
`
`
`
`enrollment question) and by stakeholder type (e.g.,
`
`
`patient/caregiver, healthcare provider, pharmacy, wholesalers/
`
`distributors, etc.).
`
`iii. Summary of reasons for calls (e.g., enrollment question) and by
`
`
`reporter (authorized representative, patient/caregiver, healthcare
`
`
`provider, other)
`
`If the summary reason for the call(s) indicates a complaint,
`
`
`
`provide details on the nature of the complaint(s) and whether they
`
`indicate potential REMS burden or patient access issues
`
`v. Summary of frequently asked questions (FAQ) by stakeholder
`
`
`type
`
`vi. A summary report of corrective actions resulting from issues
`
`
`identified
`
`c. Infrastructure Performance
`
`
`i. Number of times a backup system was used with reason(s) for
`
`
`
`
`each instance (for example, pharmacy level problem, or REMS
`
`
`iv.
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 202788/S-021
`
` Page 7
`
`
`
`vi.
`
`
`database problem) clearly defined and described with description
`
`of corrective actions taken
`
`ii. Number of times unintended system interruptions occurred for
`
`
`
`each reporting period. Describe the number of stakeholders
`
`
`affected, how the issue was resolved, and steps put into place to
`minimize the impact of future interruptions
`
`6. REMS Compliance (current reporting period)
`
`
`a. Audits of pharmacies, wholesalers/distributors, and the REMS program
`
`
`Call Center) will be conducted to ensure that all REMS processes and
`
`procedures are in place, functioning, and support the REMS program, and
`will be submitted with each assessment report. The audit reports are to
`include:
`
`i. A copy of the audit plan used for the reporting period
`
`
`ii. A detailed description of audit findings including the number with
`
`no findings, minor, moderate, or serious findings; include
`
`information about the root cause of the noncompliance
`
`iii. Number of audited sites in each stakeholder category listed
`
`
`directly above.
`
`iv. Number of audits expected, and the number of audits performed
`
`
`
`v. Number and types of deficiencies noted for each group of audited
`
`
`
`stakeholders
`
`Include a unique ID for each stakeholder that had deviations to
`track deviations by stakeholder over time.
`
`vii. Documentation of completion of training for relevant staff
`
`
`viii.
`The existence of documented processes and procedures for
`
`
`complying with the REMS
`
`ix. Verification that at each audited stakeholder’s site, the designated
`
`
`authorized representative remains the same. If different, include
`
`the number of new authorized representatives and verification of
`
`the site’s recertification.
`
`For inpatient hospital pharmacies, also report:
`
`1) The number of units of use of TIRFs ordered per inpatient
`
`
`hospital pharmacy audited per 12-month period
`
`
`2) Verification that processes such as order sets/protocols are
`
`in place to assure compliance with the REMS
`
`For closed systems, also report:
`
`1) Numbers of prescription authorizations per closed system;
`
`
`
`x.
`
`
`xi.
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 202788/S-021
`
` Page 8
`
`
`
`2) Numbers of prescriptions dispensed that did not receive
`
`
`REMS authorization
`
`xii. Describe any corrective actions taken for any non-compliance as
`
`
`identified above during the audits as well as preventative
`measures that were developed because of uncovering these non­
`compliance events
`
`1) For those with deficiencies noted, report the number that
`
`
`successfully completed a corrective and preventive action
`(CAPA) plan within one month of the audit.
`
`
`2) For any that did not complete the CAPA within one month of
`
`
`the audit, describe additional actions taken.
`
`b. Description of number, specialties, and affiliations of the personnel that
`
`
`
`constitute the Non-Compliance Review Team (NCRT) as well as the Non-
`
`Compliance Working Group
`
`c. For each non-compliance event, provide the source of the report, a
`
`
`
`
`description of the event, the cause of the event, if any patient harm
`
`
`
`resulted, and any corrective actions taken. Also provide a summary of
`
`non-compliance identified by stakeholder, including but not limited to:
`
`i.
`For Prescribers, provide:
`
`
`1) Number of prescribing healthcare providers who were non-
`
`
`compliant with TIRF REMS requirements
`
`2) Number of prescriptions written by non-certified healthcare
`
`
`providers
`
`3) Number of healthcare providers that were suspended or de­
`
`
`certified and reasons for decertification. Include if any
`
`healthcare providers were re-certified.
`
`For Pharmacies provide:
`
`1) Number and types of pharmacies for which non-compliance
`
`
`with the REMS is detected
`
`2) Number and type of non-certified pharmacies that dispensed
`
`TIRFs and the number of incidents for each
`
`
`3) Number of TIRF prescriptions dispensed that were written by
`
`
`
`non-certified prescribers and include steps taken to prevent
`
`future occurrences
`
`4) Number of prescriptions dispensed by non-certified
`
`
`pharmacies and include steps taken to prevent future
`
`occurrences
`
`
`ii.
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 202788/S-021
`
` Page 9
`
`
`
`5) Number of times certified pharmacies dispensed TIRFs to
`
`
`unenrolled patients
`
`6) Number of times a TIRF prescription was dispensed
`
`
`because a pharmacy (closed or open system) was able to
`bypass REMS edits and if any such events occurred,
`
`describe how these events occurred and were identified
`
`7) Number of TIRF prescriptions dispensed to non-enrolled
`
`
`patients and the actions taken to prevent future occurrences
`
`8) Number of pharmacies suspended or decertified by
`
`
`
`pharmacy type, the reasons for such actions, and actions to
`address non-compliance
`
`For Wholesalers/distributors provide:
`
`1) The number of enrolled wholesalers/distributors for which
`
`non-compliance with the REMS is detected
`
`2) Number of times TIRF products were distributed to a non-
`
`
`certified pharmacy or directly to patients, and actions taken
`
`to recover the TIRF product
`
`
`3) Number of wholesalers suspended or de-enrolled, reasons
`
`
`
`for such action, and actions to address non-compliance
`
`For patients provide:
`
`1) Number of patients unenrolled, and reasons for such
`
`
`
`2) Number of patients not enrolled in the REMS who were
`
`
`dispensed TIRFs
`
`d. For each non-patient stakeholder referred to in section 6.c. above:
`
`
`i. Describe any moderate or serious non-compliance with the REMS
`
`that occurred during the first year of transitioning to the modified
`
`REMS
`
`ii. Provide an assessment of stakeholder compliance in following the
`
`proposed transition plan in transitioning to the modified REMS
`
`e. For each reporting period, include a copy of the non-compliance plan used
`
`during that reporting period
`
`f. Number of times a TIRF was prescribed to an opioid non-tolerant
`
`
`
`individual by falsifying information. Include what was done to minimize
`such instances; if any such events occurred, describe how these events
`
`
`were identified
`
`
`iii.
`
`
`iv.
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`NDA 202788/S-021
`
`Page 10
`
`
`
`Safe Use Behaviors
`
`
`7. Patient Enrollment and Patient Status and Opioid Tolerance Forms
`
`
`
`a. Report on the Patient Enrollment Form and Patient Status and Opioid
`
`Tolerance Form (the “Forms”) (data presented for each individual form as
`
`well as combined):
`
`(For the 1-, 2-, and 3-year assessment reports only) The most
`i.
`
`
`common modes of submission of Forms to the REMS (e.g., Fax,
`
`
`online)
`
`ii. Number of Forms received compared to the number of TIRF
`
`
`prescriptions authorized for dispensing
`
`1) Explain any discrepancies between these two metrics
`
`
`2) Provide a description of the outcome/resolution of such
`
`event
`
`iii. Provide an analysis of cases where multiple submissions of a
`
`
`Form for the same patient were required prior to the pharmacy
`
`dispensing a prescription:
`
`1) Provide the mean, median, and range of the number of re­
`
`
`submissions
`
`2) Provide the reason(s) for the re-submissions grouped by
`
`
`
`
`commonly encountered situations
`
`3) Include an analysis of the number of Forms that were
`
`
`submitted that indicated that the patient was not opioid
`
`tolerant
`
`iv. Number of Forms submitted to the REMS with incomplete,
`
`
`
`
`erroneous, or altered fields; provide:
`
`1) An accounting of the sections of the Forms affected
`
`
`2) A description of the outcome/resolution of any incomplete,
`
`
`erroneous, or altered Forms
`
`For each TIRF dispense authorization (i.e., the prescriber
`
`provided documentation of opioid tolerance), provide the
`following:
`
`1) The number of these prescriptions that were dispensed by
`
`
`
`the pharmacy.
`
`2) For those prescriptions that were not dispensed, provide the
`
`reasons (e.g., patient not opioid tolerant as per the
`
`pharmacist, insurance/financial, etc.)
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`NDA 202788/S-021
`
`Page 11
`
`
`
`
`vi.
`
`
`For all dispensed TIRF prescriptions, provide an evaluation to
`confirm opioid tolerance based on the specific product, strength,
`
`
`frequency and duration provided on the Forms.
`
`1) Conduct a quarterly analysis of patients prescribed TIRFs to
`
`assess whether they met the threshold for opioid tolerance.
`
`
`Provide the results of these analyses in the annual
`
`
`assessment reports. The performance thresholds for this
`
`analysis have been set as follows:
`
`
`a) By the Year One assessment report, at least 80% of
`
`
`
`
`prescriptions written for TIRFs will be for opioid
`tolerant patients, as defined in labeling
`
`b) By the Year Two assessment report, at least 90% of
`
`
`prescriptions written for TIRFs will be for opioid
`tolerant patients, as defined in labeling
`
`
`c) By the Year Three assessment report, as well as for
`
`
`all subsequent assessment reports, at least 95% of
`
`prescriptions written for TIRFs will be for opioid
`tolerant patients, as defined in labeling
`
`2) Provide the number of prescriptions dispensed as well as the
`
`
`
`number determined to have been dispensed to opioid non-
`tolerant patients.
`
`a) Describe if any such events recurred in the same
`
`patients.
`
`b) Conduct a follow-up in these patients for any adverse
`
`
`events of special interest.
`
`
`Health Outcomes and/or Surrogates of Health Outcomes (data collected per
`
`reporting period)
`
`
`
`
`8. Surveillance Data
`
`
`a. Data from the REMS Patient Registry (REMS Data, Postmarketing
`
`
`Adverse Event Data): Surveillance data focused on Adverse Events of
`
`
`Special Interest (AESI) such as Accidental Exposure, Misuse, Abuse,
`
`Addiction, Overdose, Death, Serious Adverse Event.
`
`
`i. Average number of patients for each enrolled prescriber
`
`
`ii. Reports of inappropriate interchanges between TIRF products (a
`
`switch from a TIRF product to second TIRF product that is not
`
`
`
`initiated at the lowest dose when beginning the second TIRF)
`
`iii. Number and percentage of patients experiencing an Adverse
`
`Event of Special Interest AESI
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`NDA 202788/S-021
`
`Page 12
`
`
`
`
`iv.
`
`
`The total number of AESIs reported and total number of each
`AESI (includes cases reported to the TIRF REMS by all sources
`
`
`including phone, REMS Forms, and spontaneous reports received
`directly by the application holders) per report source
`
`
`v. Risk of each AESI, as a cumulative estimate from all patients
`
`
`
`enrolled in the new program, and stratified by:
`
`
`1) REMS Assessment Period
`
`
`2) Patients with and without any concomitant CNS depressant
`
`
`medication at enrollment, as documented on the Patient
`
`Enrollment Form
`
`3) Patients with each specific category of concomitant CNS
`
`
`depressant medication at enrollment
`
`
`4) Type of pain noted at enrollment: cancer pain, non-cancer
`
`
`
`pain
`
`5) Child in the home/caregiver for small children, yes or no
`
`
`vi. Summary of details of AESIs reported, and outcomes of AESIs (if
`
`
`
`known)
`
`vii. Specifically, regarding the Patient Discontinuation Form:
`
`
`1) The number of such forms submitted
`
`
`2) The number reporting AESI or death
`
`
`3) The reasons for discontinuation indicated
`
`
`The number of Targeted AESI Forms expected, the number
`
`completed, and the reasons for this discrepancy
`
`ix. Monitor whether the percentage of patients who experience
`
`
`AESIs is increasing or decreasing over time
`
`b. Surveillance data to monitor events of accidental exposure, misuse,
`
`
`abuse, addiction, overdose, death, and pediatric cases should also be
`
`drawn from poison control center data, including case narratives.
`
`
`i. Depending on results of REMS assessment reports, additional
`
`
`
`surveillance data sources may be required
`
`c. Healthcare data to monitor events of pediatric accidental exposure
`
`requiring medical evaluation. FDA determined that the REMS assessment
`
`
`must include a medical record review of drug-related hospitalizations and
`hospital emergency department visits. Depending on the study results,
`
`administrative claims data may be required in addition to or instead of
`
`medical records data.
`
`
`viii.
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`NDA 202788/S-021
`
`Page 13
`
`
`
`
`d. Death certificate data to monitor drug-related deaths, especially involving
`
`pediatric subjects
`
`e. Regarding spontaneous adverse event reports:
`
`
`i. AESI reports related to specific TIRF products will be reported to
`
`the FDA in accordance with 21 CFR 314.80.
`
`ii. AESI reports are to be linked to the registry and de-duplicated as
`
`
`
`is possible.
`
`iii. AESI reports from an inpatient setting, or outpatient reports that
`
`
`cannot be linked to enrolled patient data will be summarized
`separately.
`
`The FAERS public dashboard is to be utilized.
`
`TIRF product application holders will retrieve AESI reports from
`
`
`
`their respective safety databases and calculate reporting rates.
`
`vi. Each TIRF product application holder is to submit MedWatch
`
`reports in conjunction with un-blinded line listings directly to the
`
`FDA.
`
`
`iv.
`
`v.
`
`
`Knowledge
`
`
`
`9. Periodic Surveys of Prescribers, Pharmacists, and Patients (due with the
`
`2-Year REMS Assessment Report and annually thereafter with each
`
`assessment report)
`
`A Knowledge, Attitude and Behavior (KAB) Survey will be conducted with
`random samples of prescribers, pharmacists, and patients who have prescribed,
`
`
`dispensed, or received a TIRF medicine.
`
`a. Certified Prescriber KAB surveys will assess if prescribers are educated
`
`on the following:
`
`TIRF medicines contain fentanyl. Serious, life-threatening, and/or
`i.
`
`
`fatal respiratory depression has occurred.
`
`ii. Patients must be opioid tolerant to be prescribed a TIRF
`
`Medicine.
`
`iii. Accidental exposure to children and others and may cause severe
`
`or fatal respiratory depression.
`
`iv. Prescribers must counsel their patients on the risk of misuse,
`
`
`
`abuse, addiction, and overdose.
`
`b. Certified Outpatient Pharmacist KAB surveys will assess understanding of
`
`
`
`the following key risk messages:
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 202788/S-021
`
` Page 14
`
`
`
`i.
`
`
`TIRF medicines contain fentanyl. Serious life-threatening, and/or
`
`fatal respiratory depression has occurred.
`
`ii. Patients must be opioid tolerant to be prescribed a TIRF
`
`Medicine.
`
`For each outpatient prescription, the pharmacist must obtain a
`prescription authorization number from the TIRF REMS Access
`
`
`program prior to dispensing each TIRF medicine.
`
`iv. Accidental exposure to children and others and may cause severe
`
`or fatal respiratory depression.
`
`c. Certified Inpatient Pharmacist KAB surveys will assess understanding of
`
`the following key risk messages:
`
`
`TIRF medicines contain fentanyl. Serious, life-threatening, and/or
`i.
`
`
`fatal respiratory depression has occurred.
`
`ii. Develop internal policies and procedures to verify opioid tolerant
`
`
`inpatients who require TIRF medicine while hospitalized.
`
`d. Patient KAB surveys will assess patient understanding of the following key
`
`
`risk messages:
`
`TIRF medicines can cause you to stop breathing which can lead
`i.
`
`to death.
`
`ii. Accidental poisoning by a child or others could cause harm or
`
`
`even death.
`
`10.Knowledge Assessments (provide for each reporting period and
`
`cumulatively)
`
`a. The number of completed post-training knowledge assessments for
`
`
`healthcare providers who can prescribe and pharmacy authorized
`representatives including the method of completion and the number of
`
`attempts to complete.
`
`
`b. A summary of the most frequently missed knowledge assessment
`
`
`
`questions.
`
`c. A summary of potential comprehension or perception issues identified with
`
`the knowledge assessment.
`
`11.The requirement for assessments of an approved REMS under section
`
`
`
`505-1(g)(3) include with respect to each goal included in the strategy, an
`
`assessment of the extent to which the approved strategy, including each
`
`element of the strategy, is meeting the goal or whether one or more goals
`
`or such elements should be modified.
`
`
`iii.
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`
`
`www.fda.gov
`
`
`Reference ID: 4721753
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 202788/S-021
`
` Page 15
`
`
`We remind you that in addition to the REMS assessments submitted according to the
`timetable in the approved REMS, you must include an adequate rationale to support a
`proposed REMS modification for the addition, modification, or removal of any goal or
`
`element of the REMS, as described in section 505-1(g)(4) of the FDCA.
`
`
`
`
`We also remind you that you must submit a REMS assessment when you submit a
`supplemental application for a new indication for use as described in section 505­
`1(g)(2)(A) of the FDCA. This assessment should include:
`
`
`a) An evaluation of how the benefit-risk profile will or will not change with the new
`
`
`indication;
`
`b) A determination of the implications of a change in the benefit-risk profile for the
`
`
`current REMS;
`
`c) If the new indication for use introduces unexpected risks: A description of those
`
`
`risks and an evaluation of whether those risks can be appropriately managed
`
`with the currently approved REMS.
`
`d) If a REMS assessment was submitted in the 18 months prior to submission of
`
`
`the supplemental application for a new indication for use: A statement about
`
`
`whether the REMS was meeting its goals at the time of the last assessment and
`if any modifications of the REMS have been proposed since that assessment.
`
`e) If a REMS assessment has not been submitted in the 18 months prior to
`
`
`
`submission of the supplemental application for a new indication for use:
`
`
`
`Provision of as many of the currently listed assessment plan items as is feasible.
`
`
`
`If you propose a REMS modification based on a change in the benefit-risk profile
`
`
`or because of the new indication of use, submit an adequate rationale to support
`
`
`the modification, including: Provision of the reason(s) why the proposed REMS
`
`
`modification is necessary, the potential effect on the serious risk(s) for which the
`
`REMS was required, on patient access to the drug, and/or on the burden on the
`health care delivery system; and other appropriate evidence or data to support
`
`the proposed change. Additionally, include any changes to the assessment plan
`necessary to assess the proposed modified REMS. If you are not proposing
`REMS modifications, provide a rationale for why the REMS does not need to be
`m

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket