throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`202788Orig1s000
`
`
`MICROBIOLOGY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Product Quality Microbiology Review
`
`7 SEPTEMBER 2011
`
`
`
`NDA: 202788
`
`Drug Product Name
`Proprietary: N/A
`Non-proprietary: Fentanyl Sublingual Spray
`
`
`Review Number: 1
`
`
`Dates of Submission(s) Covered by this Review
`Submit
`Received
`Review Request
`4 March 2011
`4 March 2011
`18 April 2011
`5 August 2011
`5 August 2011
`N/A
`
`Assigned to Reviewer
`21 April 2011
`N/A
`
`
`
`Submission History (for amendments only): N/A
`
`Applicant/Sponsor
`Name: Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
`Address: 10220 S. 51st Street, Suite 2, Phoenix, AZ 85044
`Representative: Lauren H. Wind, MPH, Senior Consultant (The
`Weinberg Group Inc.)
`Telephone: 202-730-4101
`
`
`Name of Reviewer: Bryan S. Riley, Ph.D.
`
`Conclusion: Recommended for Approval
`
`
`Reference ID: 3011338
`
`

`

`NDA 202788 (Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)
`
`Microbiology Review #1
`
`Product Quality Microbiology Data Sheet
`
`A.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`TYPE OF SUBMISSION: 505(b)(2) NDA
`
`SUBMISSION PROVIDES FOR: A sublingual drug product
`
`MANUFACTURING SITE:
`
`"’“"
`
`DOSAGE FORM, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION AND
`STRENGTH/POTENCY:
`M“) solution in a glass vial with rubber
`stopper, in a Single-dose sublingual spray apparatus, 100, 200, 400, 600,
`and 800 mcg/dose.
`
`METHOD(S) OF STERILIZATION: N/A
`
`PHARMACOLOGICAL CATEGORY: Opioid analgesic
`
`SUPPORTING/RELATED DOCUMENTS: N/A
`
`REMARKS: This was an eCTD submission. The following IR was sent to the
`applicant on 1 August 2011 — “Provide descn'ptions of the test methods used for
`microbial limits. Also provide a summary of the microbiological method
`suitability testing with the drug product.” The response to the [R was provided in
`an amendment dated 5 August 201 l. The amendment was reviewed in section P5
`of this review.
`
`filename: N202788R1.doc
`
`Reference ID: 301 1338
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Microbiology Review #1
`
`
`NDA 202788 (Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)
`
`Executive Summary
`
`
`Recommendations
`
`A.
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`
`Recommendation on Approvability – This submission is
`recommended for approval on the basis of product quality
`microbiology.
`
`Recommendations on Phase 4 Commitments and/or
`Agreements, if Approvable – N/A
`
`
`Summary of Microbiology Assessments
`
`
`B.
`
`A.
`
`Brief Description of the Manufacturing Processes that relate to
`Product Quality Microbiology –
`
`
`
`Brief Description of Microbiology Deficiencies – N/A
`
`Assessment of Risk Due to Microbiology Deficiencies – N/A
`
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`III. Administrative
`
`
`A.
`
`
`B.
`
`
`C.
`
`Reviewer's Signature _____________________________
`Bryan S. Riley, Ph.D.
`Senior Review Microbiologist, OPS/NDMS
`
`
`
`Endorsement Block ______________________________
`Stephen E. Langille, Ph.D.
`Senior Review Microbiologist, OPS/NDMS
`
`CC Block
`N/A
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3011338
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`4 Page(s) has been Withheld in Full as B4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this
`page
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`BRYAN S RILEY
`09/07/2011
`
`STEPHEN E LANGILLE
`09/07/2011
`
`Reference ID: 3011338
`
`

`

`PRODUCT QUALITY MICROBIOLOGY FILING CHECKLIST
`NDA Number: 202788
`Applicant: Insys Therapeutics,
`Letter Date: 4 March 2011
`Inc.
`NDA Type: 505(b)(2)
`
`Stamp Date: 4 March 2011
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`Comments
`The submission is in
`the eCTD format.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The drug product is a
` sublingual
`spray in a unit-dose
`container.
`studies are not
`required.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Drug Name: Fentanyl
`Sublingual Spray
`
`The following are necessary to initiate a review of the NDA application:
`Content Parameter
`Yes No
`
`Is the product quality microbiology information described
`in the NDA and organized in a manner to allow substantive
`review to begin? Is it legible, indexed, and/or paginated
`adequately?
`
`2 Has the applicant submitted an overall description of the
`manufacturing processes and microbiological controls used
`in the manufacture of the drug product?
`3 Has the applicant submitted protocols and results of
`validation studies concerning microbiological control
`processes used in the manufacture of the drug product?
`4 Are any study reports or published articles in a foreign
`language? If yes, has the translated version been included
`in the submission for review?
`5 Has the applicant submitted preservative effectiveness
`studies (if applicable) and container-closure integrity
`studies?
`
`
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
`
`
` X
`
`X
`
`6 Has the applicant submitted microbiological specifications
`for the drug product and a description of the test methods?
`7 Has the applicant submitted the results of analytical method
`verification studies?
`8 Has the applicant submitted all special/critical studies/data
`requested during pre-submission meetings and/or
`discussions?
`Is this NDA fileable? If not, then describe why.
`
`9
`
`Additional Comments: N/A
`
`
`
`
`Bryan S. Riley, Ph.D.
`
`Senior Review Microbiologist
`
`Stephen E. Langille, Ph.D.
`Senior Review Microbiologist
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3 May 2011
`Date
`
`Date
`
`Reference ID: 2941763
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`BRYAN S RILEY
`05/04/2011
`
`STEPHEN E LANGILLE
`05/04/2011
`
`Reference ID: 2941763
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket