throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`202514Orig1s000
`
`OFFICE DIRECTOR MEMO
`
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 202514
`
`Page 1 of3
`
`Office Director Decisional Memo — Second Review Cycle
`
`
`
`From
`
`Edward Cox, MD MPH
`
`Office Director Decisional Memo - Second Review
`Subject
`
`Cycle
`NDA 202514
`
`NDA/BLA #
`
`Su ilement #
`
`Applicant Name
`Date of re-Submission
`
`PDUFA Goal Date
`
`Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp.
`13, 2012
`
`March 13,2012
`
`Proprietary Name /
`Established
`S i
`
`Name
`
`Zioptan
`taflu rost o .hthalmic solution
`
`Dosa_e Forms / Stren_ h
`
`o ohthalmic solution, sterile / 0.0015%
`
`Proposed Indication(s)
`
`for reducing elevated intraocular pressure in patients
`with o 0 en-an ‘ e ' laucoma or ocular h ‘0 ertension
`
`Material Reviewed/Consulted
`
`OND Action Packa ' e, includin' :
`
`Names of disci I line reviewers
`
`
`
`Review
`
`Microbiolo 3 Review
`
`Clinical Pharmacolo 3 Review
`
`CDTL Reviews
`
`Deputy Division Director’s
`Reviews
`
`Yon I-en Zhan , Phil Colan- e10
`Kassa A alew, Susan Tho u son, Jean Mulinde
`William Bo d
`
`Wiley Chambers
`
`Renata Albrecht
`
`OSE/DMEPA
`OND=Ofice ofNew Drugs
`DSI=Division of Scientific Investigations
`CDTIFCross—Discipline Team Leader
`0815: Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology
`DMEPA=Division ofMedication Emor Prevention and Analysis
`
`Denise Bau I , Todd Brides, Carol Hol uist
`
`Tafluprost is an analog of prostaglandin F20t developed for the treatment of elevated
`intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Other
`members of this class (prostaglandin F20: analogs) have been previously approved for this
`indication. Tafluprost 0.0015% has been approved in a number of other countries outside of
`
`Reference ID: 3086050
`
`

`

`NDA 202514
`
`Page 2 of3
`
`the US in preservative—free or preservative containing formulations. The formulation that the
`applicant is seeking approval of in NDA 202514 is a preservative free formulation.
`
`The review team has reviewed the issues in detail in their respective disciplines with regards to
`the safety and efficacy of Zioptan (tafluprost ophthalmic solution) 0.0015%. For a detailed
`discussion of NDA 202514, the reader is referred to the individual discipline specific reviews.
`In addition Dr. Boyd’s Cross-Discipline Team Leader Memorandums from the first and
`second review cycles and Dr. Chambers’ Deputy Division Director Reviews from the first and
`second review cycles, Dr. Albrecht’s Division Director Reviews from the first and second
`review cycles and my review from the first cycle also summarize key issues in the NDA
`submission. This memorandum will focus on the deficiency from the first cycle. For a more
`detailed discussion of the issue, the reader is referred to the Product Quality Microbiology
`Review of January 17, 2012, and the reviews from the first cycle discussing this issue.
`
`This is the second review cycle for tafluprost. On November 7, 2011, a complete response
`letter was issued that noted the following product quality microbiology deficiency:
`
`Your NDA does notprovide assurance ofthe sterility ofthefinal drugproduct. While
`you have revised your
`(m4) processing validation protocol in your submission of
`October 27, 2011,
`"’"" filling
`procedures using this revised validation protocol. In the absence
`(we) we
`cannot determine that the product is sterile and safefor use.
`
`T0 address this deficiency, provide a report describing three consecutive successful
`(”processing simulations
`(am; that you will usefor manufacturing
`thegiggduct using the inspection and accountingprocedures provided in the revised
`processing validation protocol submitted in the October 27, 2011 amendment.
`
`The product quality microbiology reviewer has evaluated the data from the 3 consecutive
`m" processing simulations using the revised validation protocol that are provided in the
`January 13, 2012, re—submission. The product quality microbiology assessment is that the
`results are acceptable and the deficiency has been adequately addressed.
`'Ihey recommend
`approval from the product quality microbiology standpoint.
`
`The proposed proprietary name, Zioptan, has been re-assessed by the Division of Medication
`Error Prevention and Analysis ODMEPA). As described in the DMEPA review of
`February 9, 2012, the proprietary name Zioptan is found to be acceptable.
`
`The application for Zioptan (tafluprost ophthahnic solution) 0.0015% was not referred to an
`FDA advisory committee because it is a member of the class of ophthahnic prostaglandin
`analogs with similar potential risks and benefits as other members in this class. The benefits
`and risks of using prostaglandin analogs to treat elevated intraocular pressure have been
`previously discussed at a meeting of the Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory
`Committee on December 8, 1995, and the safety profile of tafluprost did not raise any new
`significant safety issues. The design of the clinical studies was similar to other approved drugs
`
`Reference ID: 3086050
`
`

`

`NDA 202514
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`in this class and we are not aware of any controversial issues that would benefit from further
`advisory committee discussion.
`
`With regard to the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA), the pediatric study requirement for
`this application is being waived because necessary studies are impossible or highly
`impracticable as there are too few children with this disease/condition to study.
`
`In summary, the deficiency from the first cycle regarding inadequate assurance of sterility has
`been adequately addressed. The review team recommends approval. I agree with the review
`team’s recommendation. The application for Zioptan (tafluprost ophthalmic solution)
`0.0015% for reducing elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or
`ocular hypertension should be issued an Approval letter.
`
`Reference ID: 3086050
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`EDWARD M COX
`02/10/2012
`
`Reference ID: 3086050
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket