throbber

`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`202514Orig1s000
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 202-514
`
`ZIOPTANTM (tafluprost ophthalmic solution) 0.0015%
`
`Merck Sharp & Dohme Co
`
`Maotang Zhou, Ph.D.
`
`Review Chemist
`
`Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
`Division of New Drug Quality Assessment II
`Branch V
`
`CMC REVIEW OF NDA 202-514
`
`For the Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products
`
`Reference ID: 3080223
`
`

`

`
`
`CMC Review Data Sheet
`
`1. NDA 202-514
`
`2. REVIEW #2 3
`
`3. REVIEW DATE: 30-Jan-2012
`
`4. REVIEWER: Maotang Zhou, Ph.D.
`
`5. PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS:
`
`Previous Documents
`
`Original IND 62,690 submission
`Original IND 62,690 CMC review
`End-of-phase-Z meeting (No CMC issues discussed)
`Pre—NDA meeting
`
`Document Date
`
`23-May-2001
`23—July—2001
`24-Aug-2009
`l3-Aug- 1010
`
`6. SUBMISSION(S) BEING REVIEWED:
`
`DARRTS
`
`Document Date
`
`Stamp Date
`
`07-JAN-201 1
`
`28-APR-201 l
`
`08-JUN-201 l
`
`W
`l JUN-2011
`
`-2011
`-OI;
`-2011
`I
`26 JUL-201 l
`
`EIv
`
`0020
`0024
`
`0025
`
`0026
`
`01 -AUG-201 l
`
`0027
`
`lO-AUG-201 l
`
`0030
`
`0046
`0047
`0050
`
`22—Aug—201 l
`
`5-Dec-201 l
`7-Dec-201 l
`2-Jan-2012
`
`—
`
`Oi .
`
`Submission(s) Reviewed
`
`Ori - inal NDA Submission
`
`SD
`Number
`0000
`
`Quality Amendment (Response to Agency
`0 estions
`
`Quath Amendment (Response to Agency
`0 estions
`
`Quath Amendment (Response to Agency
`0 estions
`ethod Validation Re - . rts
`0
`.li Amendment
`Amendment
`’ es - onse to 05/11/2011 CMC IR
`
`Quality Amendment (Response to Information
`R t uest
`
`Quality Amendment (Response to Information
`R uest
`
`Quality Amendment (Response to Information
`R I uest
`
`Quality Amendment (Response to Information
`R o nest
`General Cones » .ndence
`General Cones » .ndence
`Resubmission/Class 1
`
`Referenoe ID: 3080223
`
`

`

`
`
`7. NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:
`
`Name:
`Address:
`
`Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`126 Lincoln Avenue
`
`PO. Box 2000
`
`Mail Drop: RY33-204
`Rahway, NJ 07065-0900
`Chitkala Kalidas, Ph.D.
`732—594-0599
`
`Representative:
`Telephone:
`
`8. DRUG PRODUCT NAME/CODE/TYPE:
`
`a) Proprietary Name: Tafluprost
`b) Non-Proprietary Name: Tafluprost
`c) Code Name/# (ONDQA only): AFP—l68
`(1) Chem. Type/Submission Priority (ONDQA only):
`
`0 Chem. Type: Prostaglandin analogue
`
`0 Submission Priority: Stande
`
`9. LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBMISSION: 505(b)(1)
`
`10. PHARMACOL. CATEGORY:
`
`11. DOSAGE FORM:
`
`Sterile Ophthalmic Solution
`
`12. STRENGTH/POTENCY: 0.0015%
`
`13. ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Topical
`
`14. Rx/OTC DISPENSED:
`
`‘1 Rx
`
`OTC
`
`15. SPOTS QSPECIAL PRODUCTS ON-LINE TRACKING SYSTEM):
`
`SPOTS product — Form Completed
`
`
`‘1
`Not a SPOTS product
`
`l6. CHEMICAL NAME, STRUCTURAL FORMULA, MOLECULAR
`
`FORMULA, MOLECULAR WEIGHT:
`
`Chemical Name: l-methylethyl (5Z)-7-{(1R, 2R, 3R, SS)-2-[(lE)-3,3—difluoro—4—
`phenoxy— l-butenyl]-3,5-dihydroxycyclopentyl}-5-heptenoate
`Molecular Formula: C25Hs4F205
`
`Reference ID: 3080223
`
`

`

`
`
`Molecular Weigl_1t: 452.53
`
`Chemical Structure:
`
`H0
`
`t “‘\=/\/Io\r
`HO
`F FA
`VI
`
`A. DMFs:
`
`
`
`ITEM
`REFERENCED
`
` HOLDER
`
`
`7/25/201 1-m-
`
`---
`
`
`
`
`DATE
`
`
`
`STATUS2
`
`REVIEW COMMENTS
`COMPLETED
`
`
`
`1 Action codes for DMF Table:
`l — DMF Reviewed.
`
`Other codes indicate why the DMF was not reviewed, as follows:
`2 —Type 1 DMF
`3 — Reviewed previously and no revision since last review
`4 — Sufficient information in application
`5 — Authority to reference not granted
`6 — DMF not available
`
`7 — Other (explain under "Comments")
`
`2 Adequate. Inadequate, or N/A (There is enough data in the application, therefore the
`DMF did not need to be reviewed)
`
`B. Other Documents:
`
`DOCUMENT
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`62690
`
`-EL1-
`
`Reference ID: 3080223
`
`

`

`
`
`18. STATUS:
`
`ONDQA: Approvable pending resolution of microbiology deficiencies.
`
`CONSULTS/ CMC
`RELATED REVIEWS
`Biometrics
`EES
`Pharm/Tox
`
`RECONIMENDATION
`N/A
`Overall Acc table
`N/A
`
`DATE
`
`N/A
`13-0ct-201 l
`N/A
`
`Bio ohann
`LNC
`
`N/A
`N/A
`
`N/A
`N/A
`
`Methods Validation
`
`N/A. according to the
`current 0ND I A olic
`
`
`
`M Stock
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`r0 trier
`
`name
`
`acc table see review
`
`recommended for a I .roval
`
`*DMEPA: Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis
`
`Reference ID: 3080223
`
`

`

`
`
`The CMC Review for NDA 202-514
`
`The Executive Summafl
`
`1. Recommendations
`
`A. Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability
`
`The CMC information as provided in the NDA is adequate to assure the identity,
`strength, purity, and quality of the drug product. An “Acceptable” site
`recommendation from the Office of Compliance has been made. The labels have
`adequate information as required. Therefore, from a CMC perspective, this NDA
`is recommended for approval.
`
`B. Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post—Marketing) Commitments, Agreements,
`and/or Risk Management Steps, if Approvable
`
`None
`
`II. Summary of CMC Assessments
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s)
`
`(1) General
`
`NDA 202—5 14 is submitted by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation to seek
`approval of a preservative free formulation of 0.0015% tafluprost ophthalmic
`solution for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in open angle glaucoma
`and ocular hypertension. Tafluprost (MK-2452), a new molecular entity, is an
`analogue of prostaglandin F201 (PGF2a). Tafluprost is rapidly hydrolyzed by
`corneal esterases to the biologically active metabolite, tafluprost acid. Tafluprost
`0.0015% preservative free (PF) and preservative containing (PC) formulations are
`currently approved in several other countries.
`
`(2) Drug Substance
`
`The drug substance, tafluprost, is a colorless to light yellow viscous liquid, with a
`molecular formula of C25H34F205 and a molecular weight of 453.53 Daltons.
`Tafluprost is a new molecular entity (NME) and it has not been previously
`marketed in the United States. Tafluprost is manufactured, controlled, packaged,
`and stability-tested at
`M".
`The information on
`manufacturing processes and controls for tafluprost is described in
`(no) DMF
`M”. A letter of authorization to refer to DMF
`one was provided on behalf of
`mo DIVIF
`one has been reviewed and all chemistry issues
`
`Reference ID: 3080223
`
`

`

`
`
`have been resolved. As revised, the DMF is adequate to support the current
`NDA.
`
`(3) Drug Product
`
`The drug product, tafluprost 0.0015% ophthalmic solution is a sterile aqueous
`isotonic solution that contains the drug substance tafluprost and the excipients,
`sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate, polysorbate 80, disodium edetate,
`glycerol, sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric acid, and water for injection.
`Glycerol is used to
`M of the drug product. Sodium hydroxide and
`hydrochloric acid are used to adjust the solution pH to 5.5 — 6.7. All the excipients
`are of compendial grade (USP/NF).
`
`M0 by
`The drug product solution is manufactured,
`Laboratoire Unither, France. The drug product manufacturing process (we
`
`. Each single—use ampoule is filled with 0.3 mL of the sterile solution
`containing 4.5 pg of tafluprost and affixed with a label. The labeled ampoules are
`packed in
`“m pouches, 10 ampoules
`per pouch. The pouches are then packed in carton boxes. Commercial cartons are
`either 30—count (3 pouches) or 90-count (9 pouches) and sample cartons are 10-
`count (1 pouch).
`
`At the time of the NDA submission, 18-month long term and 6-month accelerated
`stability data were provided from three registration stability batches. The stability
`testing of these batches is expected to continue to 36 months. In addition, 36-
`month long term and 6 month accelerated stability data from 3 batches were also
`provided. The available stability data support the proposed drug product shelf life
`of 36 months when stored in cold (2-8 °C) protected from moisture. The single-
`dose ampoules have to be stored in the
`M” pouch to prevent water
`evaporation. The results from in-use studies support the proposed statement:
`M4)
`
`The applicant did not discuss their control strategy in the NDA. Based on this
`reviewer’s evaluation of the NDA information, the following conventional control
`strategies are used for product quality assurance by the applicant and these appear
`to be adequate for product quality assurance.
`0 Use of excipients commonly used in ophthahnic products with
`excipient quality controlled by adherence to compendial specifications
`0 Use of critical process parameter ranges and in-process testing
`specification to control the manufacturing process
`Inclusion of secondary packaging for protection from light and water loss
`
`0
`
`Reference ID: 3080223
`
`

`

`
`
`0 Release testing of final drug product for critical product attributes such as
`appearance, identity, osmolality, pH, assay, purity, sterility, endotoxin,
`and particulate matter.
`
`During the first review cycle, the NDA as amended provided sufficient and
`adequate information on raw material controls, manufacturing processes and
`process controls, specifications for assuring consistent product quality of the drug
`substance and drug product, and sufficient stability information on the drug
`product to support the proposed expiry period. All facilities were found
`“Acceptable” by the Office of Compliance and all labels were reviewed and found
`to have the required information. The product quality microbiology reviewer, Dr.
`Jessica Cole, found the NDA deficient due to inappropriate sterility validation.
`This deficiency resulted in the NDA receiving an action of “Complete Response”
`the first review cycle. The complete response letter was issued on November 7,
`2011. The NDA was resubmitted on January 13, 2012 with appropriate sterility
`validation data. This information was found satisfactory by the product quality
`microbiology reviewer, Dr. Jessica Cole, who has now recommended the NDA
`for approval. All pending CMC issues are now resolved.
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used
`
`ZioptanTM (tafluprost) is a sterile, preservative-free, clear, colorless, isotonic
`ophthalmic solution containing tafluprost 0.0015% (15 ug/mL) intended for
`topical administration to the eye. The recommended dose is one drop per affected
`eye once daily in the evening. The applicant seeks approval of tafluprost
`ophthahnic solution, 0.0015% for a once daily dosing regimen for the reduction of
`elevated intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
`
`C. Basis for Approvability or Not-Approval Recommendation
`
`During the first review cycle, this NDA was recommended for approval in CMC
`Review #2 dated October 24, 2011, contingent upon satisfactory resolution of all
`pending product quality microbiology deficiencies. On January 13, 2012, the
`applicant filed a Class 1 resubmission with the requested quality microbiology
`data. The product quality microbiology reviewer, Dr. Jessica Cole, has reviewed
`the data and found the data acceptable. On January 17, 2012, Dr. Cole has
`recommended the application for approval in Product Quality Microbiology
`Review #3. As a result, all pending CMC issues have been resolved.
`
`In summary, the NDA has provided sufficient information on raw material
`controls, manufacturing processes and process controls, specifications,
`microbiology and endotoxin attributes and stability information to assure strength,
`purity, and quality of the drug product during the expiration dating period. All
`facilities have “Acceptable” site recommendations. All labels have the required
`information. Therefore, from the CMC perspective, NDA 202-514 is
`recommended for approval.
`
`Reference ID: 3080223
`
`

`

`
`
`III. Administrative
`
`A. Reviewer’s Signature:
`(See appended electronic signature page)
`
`Maotang Zhou, Ph.D., Reviewer, ONDQA
`
`B. Endorsement Block:
`
`(See appended electronic signature page)
`
`Rapti Madurawe, Ph.D., Branch Chief, Branch V, Division of New Drug
`Quality Assessment 11, ONDQA
`
`C. CC Block: entered electronically in DARRTS
`
`Reference ID: 3080223
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`MAOTANG ZHOU
`01/31/2012
`
`RAPTI D MADURAWE
`01/31/2012
`
`Reference ID: 3080223
`
`

`

`MEMORANDUM
`
`Date: November 1, 2011
`
`To: NDA 202-514
`
`From: Terrance Ocheltree, Ph.D., R.Ph.
`Director
`Division of New Drug Quality Assessment II
`ONDQA
`
`
`Subject: Tertiary review of ONDQA recommendation for NDA 202-514, tafluprost ophthalmic
`solution, 0.0015%, ZIOPTAN™.
`
` have assessed the ONDQA reviews of NDA 202-514 by Maotang Zhou, Ph.D. The initial
`ONDQA CMC review was entered into DARRTS on August 26, 2011, with a recommendation
`for a Complete Response due to an absence of a recommendation from the Office of Compliance
`on the manufacturing and testing sites acceptability and pending labeling issues. A second CMC
`review was entered into DARRTS on October 24, 2011 by Dr. Zhou updating the status of the
`recommendation from the Office of Compliance and adding the recommendation of “Approvable
`pending resolution of microbiology deficiencies” from the Product Quality Microbiology
`Reviewer. On October 13, 2011 the Office of Compliance entered an Overall Recommendation
`of “Acceptable” into EES. However, due to the Product Quality Microbiology Review, the
`ONDQA recommendation remains Complete Response. An ONDQA Biopharmaceutics review
`was not performed for this NDA.
`
` I
`
` I
`
` concur with the determination that the information as provided in the NDA is adequate to
`assure the identity, strength, purity, and quality of the drug product and support the
`recommendation of a drug product shelf life of 36 months for the proposed commercial product
`when it is stored in cold (2-8 ºC) environment and protected from moisture.
`
` was reviewed for the drug substance, tafluprost, and found
`The Drug Master File (DMF)
`to be ADEQUATE on July 25, 2011 by Dr. Zhou to support This NDA
`
`Secondary review of the CMC reviews was performed by Rapti Madurawe, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3040482
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`TERRANCE W OCHELTREE
`11/07/2011
`
`Reference ID: 3040482
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 202-514
`
`ZIOPTANTM (tafluprost ophthalmic solution) 0.0015%
`
`Merck Sharp & Dohme Co
`
`Maotang Zhou, Ph.D.
`
`Review Chemist
`
`Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
`Division of New Drug Quality Assessment II
`Branch V
`
`CMC REVIEW OF NDA 202-514
`
`For the Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products
`
`Reference ID: 30301 78
`
`

`

`
`
`CMC Review Data Sheet
`
`1. NDA 202-514
`
`2. REVIEW #2 2
`
`3. REVIEW DATE: 17-Oct-2011
`
`4. REVIEWER: Maotang Zhou, Ph.D.
`
`5. PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS:
`
`Previous Documents
`
`Original IND 62,690 submission
`Original IND 62,690 CMC review
`End-of-phase-Z meeting (No CMC issues discussed)
`Pre—NDA meeting
`
`Document Date
`
`23-May-2001
`23—July—2001
`24-Aug-2009
`l3-Aug- 1010
`
`6. SUBMISSION(S) BEING REVIEWED:
`
`DARRTS
`
`Document Date
`
`Stamp Date
`
`O7-JAN-201 l
`
`28-APR-20 1 1
`
`08-JUN-201 l
`
`1 wJUN—2011
`
`JUN-2011
`—2011
`
`EIv
`
`-O
`26—JUL—201 l
`
`0026
`
`01-AUG-201 1
`
`0027
`
`0030
`
`22-Aug-201 1
`
`lO—AUG—201 1 hhh888z:3;LIL
`
`SD
`5E
`N
`0000
`
`0020
`0024
`
`0025
`
`Submission(s) Reviewed
`
`Original NDA Submission
`Quality Amendment (Response to Agency
`
`Quality Amendment (Response to Agency
`
`Quath Amendment (Response to Agency
`
`Quality Amendment (Method Validation Reports)
`Amendment (Response to 05/1 1/2011 CMC IR)
`Quality Amendment (Response to Information
`Request)
`Quality Amendment (Response to Information
`Request)
`Quality Amendment (Response to Information
`Request)
`Quality Amendment (Response to Information
`Request)
`
`Reference ID: 30301 78
`
`

`

`
`
`7. NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:
`
`Name:
`Address:
`
`Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`126 Lincoln Avenue
`
`PO. Box 2000
`
`Mail Drop: RY33-204
`Rahway, NJ 07065-0900
`Chitkala Kalidas, Ph.D.
`732—594-0599
`
`Representative:
`Telephone:
`
`8. DRUG PRODUCT NAME/CODE/TYPE:
`
`a) Proprietary Name: Tafluprost
`b) Non-Proprietary Name: Tafluprost
`c) Code Name/# (ONDQA only): AFP—l68
`(1) Chem. Type/Submission Priority (ONDQA only):
`
`0 Chem. Type: Prostaglandin analogue
`
`0 Submission Priority: Stande
`
`9. LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBMISSION: 505(b)(1)
`
`10. PHARMACOL. CATEGORY:
`
`11. DOSAGE FORM:
`
`Sterile Ophthalmic Solution
`
`12. STRENGTH/POTENCY: 0.0015%
`
`13. ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Topical
`
`14. Rx/OTC DISPENSED:
`
`‘1 Rx
`
`OTC
`
`15. SPOTS QSPECIAL PRODUCTS ON-LINE TRACKING SYSTEM):
`
`SPOTS product — Form Completed
`
`
`‘1
`Not a SPOTS product
`
`l6. CHEMICAL NAME, STRUCTURAL FORMULA, MOLECULAR
`
`FORMULA, MOLECULAR WEIGHT:
`
`Chemical Name: l-methylethyl (5Z)-7-{(1R, 2R, 3R, SS)-2-[(lE)-3,3—difluoro—4—
`phenoxy— l-butenyl]-3,5-dihydroxycyclopentyl}-5-heptenoate
`Molecular Formula: C25Hs4F205
`
`Reference ID: 30301 78
`
`

`

`
`
`Molecular Weigl_1t: 452.53
`
`Chemical Structure:
`
`H0
`
`t “‘\=/\/Io\r
`HO
`F FA
`VI
`
`A. DMFs:
`
`COMPLETED 7/25/201 1
`
`DATE
`
`STATUS2
`
`REVIEW COMMENTS
`
`---
`
`1 Action codes for DMF Table:
`l — DMF Reviewed.
`
`Other codes indicate why the DMF was not reviewed, as follows:
`2 —Type 1 DMF
`3 — Reviewed previously and no revision since last review
`4 — Sufficient information in application
`5 — Authority to reference not granted
`6 — DMF not available
`
`7 — Other (explain under "Comments")
`
`2 Adequate. Inadequate, or N/A (There is enough data in the application, therefore the
`DMF did not need to be reviewed)
`
`B. Other Documents:
`
`DOCUMENT
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`62690
`
`-EL1-
`
`Reference ID: 30301 78
`
`

`

`
`
`18. STATUS:
`
`ONDQA: Approvable pending resolution of microbiology deficiencies.
`
`CONSULTS/ CMC
`RELATED REVIEWS
`Biometrics
`EES
`Pharm/Tox
`
`RECONIMENDATION
`N/A
`Overall Acc table
`N/A
`
`DATE
`
`N/A
`13-0ct-201 l
`N/A
`
`Bio ohann
`LNC
`
`N/A
`N/A
`
`N/A
`N/A
`
`Methods Validation
`
`N/A. according to the
`current 0ND I A olic
`
`M Stock
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`
`
`A
`
`Microbiology
`
`r0 trier
`
`name
`
`acc table see review
`
`Approvable pending
`resolution of microbiology
`deficiencies
`
`30—Sep—2011
`
`J Cole
`
`*DMEPA: Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis
`
`Reference ID: 30301 78
`
`

`

`
`
`The CMC Review for NDA 202-514
`
`The Executive Summafl
`
`1. Recommendations
`
`A. Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability
`
`The CMC information as provided in the NDA is adequate to assure the identity,
`strength, purity, and quality of the drug product. An “Acceptable” site
`recommendation from the Office of Compliance has been made. However, the
`product quality microbiology reviewer has made the recommendation of
`“Approvable pending resolution of microbiology deficiencies”. Therefore, from
`the CMC perspective, this NDA is not recommended for approval until all
`pending product quality microbiology deficiencies are satisfactorily resolved.
`
`B. Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post-Marketing) Commitments, Agreements,
`and/or Risk Management Steps, if Approvable
`
`None
`
`II. Summary of CMC Assessments
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s)
`
`(1) General
`
`NDA 202—514 is submitted by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation to seek
`approval of a preservative free formulation of 0.0015% tafluprost ophthalmic
`solution for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in open angle glaucoma
`and ocular hypertension. Tafluprost (MK-2452), a new molecular entity, is an
`analogue of prostaglandin F201 (PGFZa). Tafluprost is rapidly hydrolyzed by
`corneal esterases to the biologically active metabolite, tafluprost acid. Tafluprost
`0.0015% preservative free (PF) and preservative containing (PC) formulations are
`currently approved in several other countries.
`
`(2) Drug Substance
`
`The drug substance, tafluprost, is a colorless to light yellow viscous liquid, with a
`molecular formula of C25H34F205 and a molecular weight of 453.53 Daltons.
`Tafluprost is a new molecular entity (NME) and it has not been previously
`marketed in the United States. Tafluprost is manufactured, controlled, packaged,
`and stability-tested at
`_
`(”m The information on
`manufacturing processes and controls for tafluprost is described in
`“""DMF
`
`Reference ID: 30301 78
`
`

`

`
`
`one was provided on behalf of
`(no) A letter of authorization to refer to DMF
`”‘4’ DMF
`(mo has been reviewed and all chemistry issues
`have been resolved. As revised, the DMF is adequate to support the current
`NDA.
`
`(3) Drug Product
`
`The drug product, tafluprost 0.0015% ophthalmic solution is a sterile aqueous
`isotonic solution that contains the drug substance tafluprost and the excipients,
`sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate, polysorbate 80, disodium edetate,
`glycerol, sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric acid, and water for injection.
`Glycerol is used to
`(”mof the drug product. Sodium hydroxide and
`hydrochloric acid are used to adjust the solution pH to 5.5 — 6.7. All the excipients
`are of compendial grade (USP/NF).
`
`“""by
`The drug product solution is manufactured,
`Laboratoire Unither, France. The drug product manufacturing process
`
`(m4) Each single-use ampoule is filled with 0.3 mL of the sterile solution
`containing 4.5 pg of tafluprost and affixed with a label. The labeled ampoules are
`packed in
`“’wpouches, 10 ampoules
`per pouch. The pouches are then packed in carton boxes. Commercial cartons are
`either 30—count (3 pouches) or 90—count (9 pouches) and sample cartons are 10-
`count (1 pouch).
`
`At the time of the NDA submission, 18-month long term and 6-month accelerated
`stability data were provided from three registration stability batches. The stability
`testing of these batches is expected to continue to 36 months. In addition, 36-
`month long term and 6 month accelerated stability data from 3 batches were also
`provided. The available stability data support the proposed drug product shelf life
`of 36 months when stored in cold (2-8 °C) protected fiom moisture. The single-
`dose ampoules have to be stored in the
`(mo pouch to prevent water
`evaporation. The results from in—use studies support the proposed statemenbtzw
`
`The applicant did not discuss their control strategy in the NDA. Based on this
`reviewer’s evaluation of the NDA information, the following conventional control
`strategies are used for product quality assurance by the applicant and these appear
`to be adequate for product quality assurance.
`
`0 Use of excipients commonly used in ophthalmic products with
`excipient quality controlled by adherence to compendial specifications
`
`0 Use of critical process parameter ranges and in-process testing
`specification to control the manufacturing process
`
`Reference ID: 30301 78
`
`

`

` 0
`
`Inclusion of secondary packaging for protection from light and water loss
`Release testing of final drug product for critical product attributes such as
`appearance, identity, osmolality, pH, assay, purity, sterility, endotoxin,
`and particulate matter.
`
`During review, discrepancies were noted in some data and information provided
`in the NDA. Additional information provided by the applicant relating to these
`issues was reviewed, and as presented, is satisfactory. The CMC information as
`provided in the NDA is adequate to assure the identity, strength, purity and
`quality of the drug product. On September 30, 2011, the product quality
`microbiology reviewer made the recommendation of “Approvable pending
`resolution of microbiology deficiencies”. Therefore, from the CMC perspective,
`this NDA is not recommended for approval until all pending product quality
`microbiology deficiencies are satisfactorily resolved.
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used
`
`ZioptanjM (tafluprost) is a sterile, preservative-free, clear, colorless, isotonic
`ophthalmic solution containing tafluprost 0.0015% (15 ug/mL) intended for
`topical administration to the eye. The recommended dose is one drop per affected
`eye once daily in the evening. The applicant seeks approval of tafluprost
`ophthahnic solution, 0.0015% for a once daily dosing regimen for the reduction of
`elevated intraocular pressure in open—angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
`
`C. Basis for Approvability or Not-Approval Recommendation
`
`In CMC review #1 dated August 25, 2011, this NDA was recommended for
`approval contingent upon the following pending issues being satisfactorily
`resolved: (1) Overall site recommendation: Office of Compliance has not yet
`issued an overall acceptable site recommendation in EES; (2) Labeling: The
`review team has not yet initiated labeling negotiations
`
`On October 13, 2011, the Office of Compliance made an overall recommendation
`of “Acceptable” for the facilities related to the NDA (See the attached establish
`evaluation report). The labeling changes recommended by ONDQA have been
`forwarded to the applicant by the FDA review team (See CMC Assessment in this
`review). However, on September 30, 2011, the product quality microbiology
`reviewer made the recommendation of “Approvable pending resolution of
`microbiology deficiencies” (See Dr. Jessica Cole’s Product Quality Microbiology
`Review in DARRTS). Therefore, from the CMC perspective, this NDA is not
`recommended for approval until all pending product quality microbiology
`deficiencies are satisfactorily resolved.
`
`Reference ID: 30301 78
`
`

`

`
`
`HI. Administrative
`
`A. Reviewer’s Signature:
`(See appended electronic signature page)
`
`Maotang Zhou, Ph.D., Reviewer, 0NDQA
`
`B. Endorsement Block:
`
`(See appended electronic signature page)
`
`Rapti Madurawe, Ph.D., Branch Chief, Branch V, Division of New Drug
`Quality Assessment II, 0NDQA
`
`C. CC Block: entered electronically in DARRTS
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3030178
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`MAOTANG ZHOU
`10/17/2011
`
`RAPTI D MADURAWE
`10/24/2011
`
`Reference ID: 3030178
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 202-514
`
`ZIOPTANTM (tafluprost ophthalmic solution) 0.0015%
`
`Merck Sharp & Dohme Co
`
`Maotang Zhou, Ph.D.
`
`Review Chemist
`
`Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
`Division of New Drug Quality Assessment II
`Branch V
`
`CMC REVIEW OF NDA 202-514
`
`For the Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products
`
`Reference ID: 3006655
`
`

`

`
`
`Table of Contents
`
`CMC Review Data Sheet4
`
`The Executive Summary .........................................................................................8
`
`1. Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 8
`
`A. Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability ....................................................................... 8
`
`B. Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post-Marketing) Commitments, Agreements, and/or Risk
`Management Steps. if Approvable ................................................................................................... 8
`
`II. Summary of CMC Assessments ................................................................................................ 8
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s) ............................................................. 8
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used ....................................................... 10
`
`C. Basis for Approvability or Not-Approval Recommendation ......................................................... 10
`
`III. Administrative .......................................................................................................................... 10
`
`CMC Assessment........................................................................... ......................... 11
`
`1. Review Of Common Technical Document—Quality (Ctd—Q) Module 3.2: Body Of Data ....... 1 l
`
`S. DRUG SUBSTANCE .................................................................................................................... 11
`S. 1
`General Information ........................................................................................................................ 11
`Nomenclature............................................................................................................................................. l 1
`Structure..................................................................................................................................................... 11
`
`S. 1.1
`8.1.2
`
`8 1.3
`8.2
`8.2.1
`
`General Properties...................................................................................................................................... 11
`Manufacture .................................................................................................................................... 12
`Manufacturers ............................................................................................................................................ 12
`
`8.2.2
`8.2.3
`
`8.2.4
`8.2.5
`
`Description of Manufacturing Process and Process Controls..................................................................... 12
`Control of Materials ................................................................................................................................... 13
`
`Controls of Critical Steps and Intermediates .............................................................................................. 13
`Process Validation and/or Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 13
`
`8.2.6
`8.3
`8.3.1
`
`Manufacturing Process Development ........................................................................................................ 13
`Characterization .............................................................................................................................. 13
`Elucidation of Structure and other Characteristics ..................................................................................... 13
`
`8.3.2
`8.4
`8.4.1
`8.4.2
`8.4.3
`8.4.4
`8.4.5
`8.5
`
`S.6
`s.7
`8.7.]
`8.7.2
`S 7.3
`
`Impurities ................................................................................................................................................... 13
`Control of Drug Substance .............................................................................................................. 13
`Specification .............................................................................................................................................. 13
`Analytical Procedures ................................................................................................................................ 14
`Validation of Analytical Procedures .......................................................................................................... 15
`Batch Analyses .......................................................................................................................................... 15
`Justification of Specification ...................................................................................................................... 15
`Reference Standards or Materials ................................................................................................... 16
`
`Container Closure System............................................................................................................... 16
`Stability ........................................................................................................................................... 16
`Stability Summary and Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 16
`Postapproval Stability Protocol and Stability Commitment ....................................................................... 16
`Stability Data ............................................................................................................................................. 16
`
`P. DRUG PRODUCT ........................................................................................................................ 17
`
`Reference ID: 3006655
`
`Page 2 of 77
`
`CMC Review #1
`
`

`

`
`
`Description and Composition of the Drug Product ......................................................................... 17
`P. 1
`Pharmaceutical Development.......................................................................................................... l7
`P2
`Components of the Drug Product............................................................................................................... l7
`P.2.l
`P.2.l.l Drug Substance...................

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket