throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`202270Orig1s000
`
`
`PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`
`PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY NDA REVIEW AND EVALUATION
`
`Application Number:
`Supporting Document/s:
`Applicant’s Letter Date
`CDER Stamp Date:
`Product:
`Indication:
`Applicant:
`Review Division:
`
`Reviewer:
`Supervisor/Team Leader:
`Division Director:
`Project Manager:
`
`202270
`SDN 1
`23 Sept 2010
`23 Sept 2010
`Sitagliptin/Metformin XR FDC (MK-0431A XR)
`Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
`Merck
`Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products
`(HFD-510)
`Patricia Brundage, Ph.D.
`Todd Bourcier, Ph.D.
`Mary Parks, M.D.
`Raymond Chiang
`
`
`Disclaimer
`
`Except as specifically identified, all data and information discussed below and necessary for
`approval of NDA 202270 are owned by Merck or are data for which Merck has obtained a
`written right of reference. Any information or data necessary for approval of NDA 202270 that
`Merck does not own or have a written right to reference constitutes one of the following: (1)
`published literature, or (2) a prior FDA finding of safety or effectiveness for a listed drug, as
`described in the drug’s approved labeling. Any data or information described or referenced
`below from a previously approved application that Merck does not own (or from FDA reviews or
`summaries of a previously approved application) is for descriptive purposes only and is not
`relied upon for approval of NDA 202270.
`.
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`1
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`
`
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`1
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................3
`INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................3
`1.1
`1.2
`BRIEF DISCUSSION OF NONCLINICAL FINDINGS ................................................................3
`1.3
`RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................4
`2 DRUG INFORMATION .........................................................................................................5
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`STUDIES SUBMITTED.......................................................................................................10
`
`PHARMACOLOGY.............................................................................................................10
`
`PHARMACOKINETICS/ADME/TOXICOKINETICS ...........................................................11
`
`6 GENERAL TOXICOLOGY..................................................................................................12
`
`7 GENETIC TOXICOLOGY ...................................................................................................12
`7.1
`IN VITRO REVERSE MUTATION ASSAY IN BACTERIAL CELLS (AMES)................................13
`7.2
`IN VITRO CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATION ASSAYS IN MAMMALIAN CELLS ...........................16
`8 CARCINOGENICITY ..........................................................................................................20
`
`9 REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY.............................................21
`
`SPECIAL TOXICOLOGY STUDIES ...............................................................................22
`
`INTEGRATED SUMMARY AND SAFETY EVALUATION.............................................26
`
`REFERENCES................................................................................................................27
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`2
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`1
`
`Executive Summary
`
`1 .1
`
`Introduction
`
`This is a 505(b)(2) application for the fixed dose combination (FDC) drug product of sitagliptin
`phosphate and extended release (XR) formulation of metformin hydrochloride (MK-0431A XR)
`for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Both sitagliptin and metformin
`are approved oral antihyperglycemic agents. This 505(b)(2) application relies in part on the
`Agency’s findings of the safety and efficacy as reflected in the approved product labels for
`Janumet® (sitagliptin/metformin IR FDC; Merck; NDA 22—044) and Glumetza® (metformin XR;
`Depomed Inc; NDA 21-748). Because the sponsor is the primary NDA holder for sitagliptin, all
`nonclinical information for this component of the FDC was available for review. Chemical
`characterization of metformin did not identify differences from the referenced product that
`required additional toxicological evaluation. No nonclinical studies with the FDC of sitagliptin
`and metformin XR (MK-0431A XR) were conducted in support of this 505(b)(2) application.
`
`1.2
`
`Brief Discussion of Nonclinical Findings
`
`No nonclinical studies with the FDC drug product of sitagliptin and metformin XR
`(MK-0431A XR) were performed. The potential toxicity of sitagliptin co-administered with
`metformin was previously evaluated in 3-month toxicology studies in the dog under
`NDA 22-044.
`
`Information on the genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity described in the
`reference listed drug labels of Janumet® (sitagliptin/metformin IR FDC) and Glumetza®
`(metformin XR) support the chronic administration of MK—0431A XR. Pregnancy Category ‘B' is
`recommended for the FDC drug product given that both sitagliptin and metformin are labeled as
`Pregnancy Category ‘B’.
`
`M" degradate of sitagliptin identified in MK—0431A XR at the
`To qualify an
`"m which exceeds the qualification threshold (ICH QBB(R2)), the sponsor
`proposed limit of
`conducted a 3-month toxicity study in rats and two in vitro genotoxicity studies (microbial
`mutagenesis assay and chromosomal aberration assay). Microbial mutagenesis and in vitro
`chromosomal aberration assays using
`«no batch of sitagliptin containing
`"m degradation products were negative
`“9‘" degradation product. A 3-month rat
`“"“’ limit for the
`supporting a
`toxicity study, in which rats were administered a 60 mg/kg (360 mg/mz) dose of sitagliptin with
`and without the two
`"N" degradation products
`M"
`(we) showed that the hydrolysis degradates had no
`toxicological effect. Given that the expected level of degrade at mo (0.19 mg/m2) associated
`with the MHRD of sitagliptin (100 mg; 62 mg/m2) is approximately 6-fold less than the level
`assessed in the 3-month toxicity study in rats, the
`“9‘" degradate is not
`expected to cause a toxicological effect in humans. Collectively, the findings of the 3—month
`toxicity study in rats and two negative in vitro genotoxicity studies (microbial mutagenesis assay
`and chromosomal aberration assay) support the
`m4) limit for
`"M degradation
`product of sitagliptin.
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`1 .3
`
`Recommendations
`
`1.3.1
`
`Approvability
`
`Pharmacology and Toxicology recommends the approval of MK—0431A XR for the proposed
`indication in adults.
`
`1.3.2 Additional Non Clinical Recommendations
`
`No additional nonclinical studies are required.
`
`1.3.3
`
`Labeling
`
`For this 505(b)(2) application for which the sponsor did not conduct a nonclinical
`development/animal toxicology program with FDC, the language used in the label should be
`identical to the referenced drug labels of Janumet° (sitagliptin/metfonnin IR FDC) for sitagliptin
`and Glumetza® (metformin XR) for metfonnin XR. In the proposed labeling, the sections relative
`to the pharmacology/toxicology of sitagliptin and metformin are identical to the current Janumet0
`label. The sections of the proposed label discussing the phannacologyltoxicology of metformin
`were replaced with the information in the Glumetzao (metformin XR) label. Changes/additions to
`the proposed label are underlined.
`
`8.1
`
`Pregnancy
`
`Metformin h drochlon'de
`
` e ormIn was not teratogenic in rats and rabbits at doses up to 600 mg/kglday,
`
`which represent 3 and 6 times the maximum recommended human daily dose of 2000 mg
`based on body surface area comparison for rats and rabbits, respectively. However,
`because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response,
`Metforrnin HCl should not be used during pregnancy unless clearly needed.
`
`13
`
`NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY
`
`13.1
`
`Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
`
`Metformin hydrochloride
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`(5) (4)
`
`Long-term carcinogeniciy studies have been performed in Sprague Dawley rats at
`doses of 1501 300I and 450 mg/kg/day in males and 150l 450l 900l and 1200 mg/kg/day in
`females. These doses are approximately 2, 4, and 8 times in males, and 3, 7, 12, and
`16 times in females of the maximum recommended human daily dose of 2000 mg based
`on bod surface area com arisons. No evidence of carcino enic' with metformin was
`
`found in either male or female rats. A carcinogenicig study was also @rformed in Tg.AC
`transgenic mice at doses up to 2000 mg applied dermally. No evidence of carcinogenicity
`was observed in male or female mice.
`Genotoxici
`assessments in the Ames test
`
`ene mutation test mouse I m homa
`
`vivo mouse
`(human lymphocfles) and in
`test
`chromosomal aberrations
`cells),
`micronucleus tests were negative. Fertilig of male or female rats was not affected by
`metformin when administered at dose up to 600 mg/kg/dayl which is approximately 3
`times the maximum recommended human daily dose based on body surface area
`comparisons.
`
`2
`
`Drug Information
`
`2.1
`
`Drug
`
`CAS Registry Number
`
`Sitagliptin Phosphate: 654671-77-9
`
`Metformin HCI: 1115-70-4
`
`Code Name
`
`Sitagliptin Phosphate: MK-0431, L-000224715
`
`Metformin HCI: MK—9378, L—000282095
`
`Chemical Name
`
`Sitagliptin Phosphate:
`-
`7-[(3R)«3-amino—1-oxo-4-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)butyl]-5,6,7,8- tetrahydro-[3-
`(trifluoromethy|)-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazine phosphate (1:1) monohydrate
`
`Metformin HCI:
`
`- N,N-dimethylimidodicarbonimidic diamide hydrochloride
`-
`1,1-dimethylbiguanide hydrochloride
`I N,N-dimethylbiguanide hydrochloride
`- N’-dimethylguanylguanidine hydrochloride
`
`Molecular Formula/Molecular Weight
`
`Sitagliptin Phosphate: C16H15F5N5O - H304P - H20/523.32
`
`Metformin HCI: C4H11N5 - HCl/165.63
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Structure or Biochemical Description
`Sitagliptin Phosphate:
`
`
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`Metformin:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pharmacologic Class
`Sitagliptin is dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4 inhibitor); an antihyperglycemic
`agent.
`Metformin is an antihyperglycemic agent.
`
`2.2
`
`Relevant NDAs and DMFs
`NDA 21-995 (Januvia®, sitagliptin phosphate)
`NDA 22-044 (Janumet™; sitagliptin phosphate and metformin HCl IR)
`NDA 21-748 (Glumetza™; metformin HCl XR)
`DMF
` (Type II;
` metformin)
`Drug Formulation
`2.3
`MK-0431A XR tablets contains 64.25 mg or 128.5 mg of sitagliptin phosphate (50 mg or 100 mg
`free base equivalent) and 500 mg or 1000 mg of extended-release metformin HCl
`(metformin XR). Three tablet strengths of the FDC drug product have been developed for
`registration:
`
`
`• Sitagliptin/metformin XR 50 mg/500 mg (to be given as 2 tablets once daily)
`• Sitagliptin/metformin XR 50 mg/1000 mg (to be given as 2 tablets once daily)
`• Sitagliptin/metformin XR 100 mg/1000 mg (to be given as 1 tablet once daily)
`
`
`MK-0431A XR tablets can be separated into three main components:
`• A
` core that provides an extended release profile of
`metformin HCl
`• A sitagliptin active coating over the
`sitagliptin
`• A polymeric film coating over the active
`
`
` core designed to provide immediate release of
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`6
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`
`
`Sitagliptin is formulated as the monohydrate phosphat
`, which was extensively
`ro ram.
`characterized durin the Januvia0 develo ment
`
`
`Metfonnin HCI will be purchased as a oompendial grade material (conforming to the USP and/or
`
`Ph. Eur.) fiomunder Type II DMF. No modifications to the chemical or
`
`e rug su stance are required for the formulation and the material is
`
`physical prope Ies o
`used as supplied.
`
`Drug Product Unit Composition (Sponsor’s Table)
`
`
`
`mg Sitagliptin Phosphate/mg
`Metfonnin H drochloride
`
`Core Tablet
`Metf
`'
`'
`
`loride
`
`USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`USP-NF, Pb. Eur.
`W10
`USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`Wslafline Cellulose
`USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`Silicon Dioxide, Colloidal
`USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`Sodium St
`lFumarate
`Core Tablet Weight —
`API Film Cong
`Sitagliptin PhosphateT
`Propyl Gallat
`
`USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`
`
`
`Hypromellosee‘ USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`
`Polyethylene Glycol
`
`USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`USP-NF
`USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`
`USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`
`USP-NF, Ph. Eur.
`
`2.4
`
`Comments on Novel Excipients
`
`All exci
`
`ients are com endial
`
`rade with the exce tion of the
`
`
`
`
`hydroxypropyl
`formulations are mixtures of excipients
`
`ce u ose, an
`Ianlum dioxide) covered by USP-NF, Ph. Eur. an or
`. Acceptance of the
`coating mixtures will be based on the supplier’s certificates of analysis and in-house testing of
`characteristics and a suitable identification test.
`
`The
`
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`,
`(m4)
`S - onsor 5 Table
`
`
`
`Film-Coatinv lnvredicnts
`
`
`USP-NF, P11. Eur.
`Hypromellosel
`USP-NF. P11. Eur.
`USP—NF, Ph. Eur.
`21 CFR 82.51, 21 CFR 82.102 and E132
`
`(b) (9
` Hydroxyprupyl Cellulose
`
`Titanium Dioxide
`FD&C Blue #2flndiuo Carmine Aluminum Lake
`
`,
`(5X4)
`[Sponsor 5 Table)
`Film-Coatin Inmdicnts
`Hypromellose
`0)
`Hydroxypropyl Cellulose
`Titanium Dioxide
`FD&C Blue #2llndi o Camtine Alun‘iinun‘i Lake
`
`USP—NF. Ph. Eur.
`USP-NF. Ph. Eur.
`USP-NF. Ph. Eur.
`'21 CPR 82.51. '21 CPR 82.102 and E132
`
`
`USP—NF
`
`(19(4)
`
`S . onsor’s Table
`
`Hypromellose
`Hydroxypropyl Cellulose
`Titanium Dioxide
`FD&C Blue #Zi‘lndigo Cannine Aluminum Lake
`Iron Oxide Yellow
`
`USP-NF, P11. Eur.
`USP—NF. Pl]. Eur.
`USP-NF, P11. Eur.
`21 CFR 82.51. 21 CFR 82.102, and E132
`
`“M"
`The maximum daily intake of the compendial excipient hypromellose
`"M" in the sitagliptin coating, would be up to
`“M" which is greater than the level of
`hypromellose
`am in approved drug products
`M" However, there is no
`toxicological concern regarding this excipient that would necessitate reducing the level.
`
`2.5
`
`Comments on Impurities/Degradants of Concern
`
`Impurities
`(m4) and sitagliptin-related impurities are within the
`All metformin-related impurities (DMF
`ICH Q3A identification and qualification thresholds.
`
`Sitagliptin Impurities (Sponsor’s Tabbée)
`
`Degradants
`Acceptance criteria were established for individual and total degradates in MK—0431A XR tablets
`in accordance with the ICH Q3B(R2) and are based on potential contributions from the drug
`substances, manufacture of drug product, and any increase during formal stability studies (FSS)
`or product characterization studies (PCS) of the drug product. All the release and shelf-life
`criteria are supported by release and stability data for 9 F88 batches (up to 52 weeks).
`
`am (release and shelf-life) for single unspecified metformin degradates in
`The limit of
`MK—0431A XR tablets meets the ICH Q3B(R2) reporting threshold based on the maximum daily
`clinical dose of metformin (2000 mg/day).
`
`(m4)
`The proposed release and shelf-life limit for single unspecified sitagliptin degradates is
`which meets the ICH Q3B(R2) identification threshold based on the maximum daily clinical dose
`of sitagliptin (100 mg/day).
`“"0 studies identified a sitagliptin
`("mdegradation
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`path. The proposed shelf-life limit for the identified
`
`
`(anticipated level at the proposed the two-year prolu! eprryi; He rale of
`degradant is
`
`degradate formation is dependent on relative humidity at 25°C. NH),
`
`
`on
`in a
`degradant” exceeds the qualification limit. The lack o oxn
`toxicity
`
`0 negative in vitro genotoxicity studies (microbial muta enesis assa and
`an
`study in ra
`
`chromosomal aberration assay) using a sitagliptin batch containing
`
`egr a on
`
`
`*degradation products supports th- Iimit for th
`
`pro u
`
`.
`
`No significant increase in the level of any degradates has been observed in FSS out to
`52 weeks at the proposed storage condition of 25°C.
`
`
`
`M—cttormin Any Unspecified: Max.
`
`Acce ance Criteria
`
`Total chmdates: Max.
`
`R_elcase:
`
`AnyUnspecified. Max.
`
`Total Degradatcs: Max
`
`mcgmdatc: Max.
`Any Unspecified: Max.
`Total De radatcs: Max.
`
`chradates
`release and shelf-life
`
`Sitagliptin chradates
`
`(release and shelf-life)
`
`ATTRIBUTES
`
`|
`
`DCImdntes (351's) - Simgliptin
`
`Inspecified Degradate
`oml Degmdates
`Degradates (is) - Metformin
`ingle Unspecified Degradate
`oml D'; dates
`
`Test Methods
`
`Assay, Degradalc & Identity by
`
`HPDC
`Sec. 3.2.P.5.2.2-0431a-xrtablct
`
`Assay, chradatc & identity by
`
`HPDC
`
`Sec. 3 .2.P.5.2. l-0431a—xrtablct
`
`TIME Weeks
`
`2.6
`
`Proposed Clinical Population and Dosing Regimen
`
`The proposed dosing regimen is sitagliptin/metformin XR 50 mgl500 mg and 50 mgl1000 mg
`administered as two tablets once daily and sitagliptin/metformin XR 100 mgl1000 mg
`administered as one tablet once daily.
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`

`

`
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`NDA 202270
`
`Regulatory Background
`2.7
`Sitagliptin (25, 50, and 100 mg tablets) was approved in 2006 as an oral antihyperglycemic in
`patients with T2DM (Januvia®; NDA 21-955) with a recommended dose of 100 mg/daily. In
`2007, a FDC of sitagliptin and metformin IR (50 mg sitagliptin/500 mg metformin and 50 mg
`sitagliptin/1000 mg metformin tablets) was approved (Janumet®; NDA 22-044) for glycemic
`control in T2DM patients. Janumet® is administered twice daily with a maximum recommended
`daily dose of 100 mg sitagliptin and 2000 mg metformin.
`
`Metformin (IR formulation) was first approved in the United States in 1994 (Glucophage®;
`NDA 20-357) as an oral antihyperglycemic in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The
`maximum recommended daily dose is 2550 mg in adults. Several extended release
`formulations were also approved:
`
`
`• 2000/2002: extended release tablet containing 500 mg or 750 mg metformin
`(Glucophage XR®, NDA 21-202).
`• 2004: extended release tablet containing 500 mg or 1000 mg metformin (Fortamet®,
`NDA 21-574)
`• 2005: extended release tablet containing 500 mg or 1000 mg metformin (Glumetza®;
`NDA 21-748)
`Studies Submitted
`
`3
`
`Studies Reviewed
`3.1
`This is a 505(b)(2) submission. The sponsor is referencing the Agency’s previous findings of
`safety and efficacy for the reference listed drugs of Janumet® (sitagliptin/metformin IR) and
`Glumetza ® (metformin XR; NDA 21-748) to support the nonclinical safety of MK-0431A XR
`(sitagliptin/metformin XR FDC). The sponsor conducted the following studies to qualify two
`degradates of sitagliptin:
`
`
`
`• Microbial Mutagenesis Assay (TT #09-8168)
`• Assay for Chromosomal Aberrations In Vitro, in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
`(TT #09-8623)
`• Three-Month Oral Toxicity Study in Rats (TT #09-1239)
`3.2
`Studies Not Reviewed
`None.
`Previous Reviews Referenced
`3.3
`Nonclinical data supporting the safety the co-administration of are reviewed under NDA 22-044
`by Dr. Todd Bourcier.
`4
`Pharmacology
`No nonclinical pharmacology studies were conducted for this 505(b)(2) submission for
`MK-0431A XR. The nonclinical pharmacology of sitagliptin and metformin (IR and XR),
`individually, were previously established. Information pertaining to sitagliptin and metformin is
`derived from the approved Janumet® (sitagliptin/metformin IR FDC) and Glumetza®
`(metformin XR) labels.
`
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`10
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Sitagliptin
`According to the approved label for Janumet® (sitagliptin/metformin IR):
`
`
`
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`Sitagliptin is a DPP-4 inhibitor, which is believed to exert its actions in patients with
`type 2 diabetes by slowing the inactivation of incretin hormones. Concentrations of the
`active intact hormones are increased by sitagliptin, thereby increasing and prolonging
`the action of these hormones. Incretin hormones, including glucagon-like peptide-1
`(GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), are released by the
`intestine throughout the day, and levels are increased in response to a meal. These
`hormones are rapidly inactivated by the enzyme DPP-4. The incretins are part of an
`endogenous system involved in the physiologic regulation of glucose homeostasis.
`When blood glucose concentrations are normal or elevated, GLP-1 and GIP increase
`insulin synthesis and release from pancreatic beta cells by intracellular signaling
`pathways involving cyclic AMP. GLP-1 also lowers glucagon secretion from pancreatic
`alpha cells, leading to reduced hepatic glucose production. By increasing and prolonging
`active incretin levels, sitagliptin increases insulin release and decreases glucagon levels
`in the circulation in a glucose-dependent manner. Sitagliptin demonstrates selectivity for
`DPP-4 and does not inhibit DPP-8 or DPP-9 activity in vitro at concentrations
`approximating those from therapeutic doses.
`
`
`Sitagliptin inhibits plasma DPP-4 activity in a dose- and concentration-dependent manner. In
`vitro measurement of DPP-4 inhibition indicates that near-maximal glucose lowering activity is
`associated with inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity of approximately ≥ 80% and enhancement of
`post-glucose challenge active GLP-1 concentrations of ≥ 2-fold.
`
`Metformin
`According to the approved label for Glumetza® (metformin XR):
`
`Metformin is an antihyperglycemic agent, which improves glucose tolerance in patients
`with type 2 diabetes, lowering both basal and postprandial plasma glucose. Its
`pharmacologic mechanisms of action are different from other classes of oral
`antihyperglycemic agents. Metformin decreases hepatic glucose production, decreases
`intestinal absorption of glucose, and improves insulin sensitivity by increasing peripheral
`glucose uptake and utilization. Unlike sulfonylureas, metformin does not produce
`hypoglycemia in either patients with type 2 diabetes or normal subjects (except in
`special circumstances) and does not cause hyperinsulinemia. With metformin therapy,
`insulin secretion remains unchanged while fasting insulin levels and day-long plasma
`insulin response may actually decrease.
`
`
`Metformin has also been reported to increase GLP-1 concentrations (Drucker et al., 2006;
`Godarzi et al., 2005; Holst et al., 2008; Migoya et al., 2010).
`
` 5
`
`Pharmacokinetics/ADME/Toxicokinetics
`
`No nonclinical pharmacokinetic/ADME/toxicokinetic studies were conducted with MK-0431A XR.
`The nonclinical ADME properties and pharmacokinetics (PK) of sitagliptin and metformin XR,
`individually, were previously established. Doses of each component of the FDC are consistent
`with the doses approved for each drug separately; therefore, exposure margins achieved in the
`nonclinical toxicology program for each component are applicable to the proposed FDC product.
`
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`NDA 202270
`
`In lieu of nonclinical PK studies, the sponsor conduced clinical pharmacology studies including
`four biopharmaceutics studies (P112, P163, P164 and P147) and two PK studies (P012 and
`P165) in support of this 505(b)(2) submission for MK-0431A XR. Results of these clinical studies
`were evaluated by FDA’s clinical pharmacology review team.
`
` 6
`
`General Toxicology
`
`No nonclinical toxicology studies were conducted with MK-0431A XR.
`
`Nonclinical studies with sitagliptin were conducted in mice (3 months), rats (up to 6 months),
`dogs (up to 1 year), rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys (up to 3 months) under NDA 21-955
`(Januvia®; sitagliptin), which is held by the sponsor of the proposed FDC product. The kidney
`(renal tubule degeneration and necrosis at ≥1500 mg/kg), liver (hepatocellular hypertrophy with
`↑ liver weight at ≥500 mg/kg; hepatocellular degeneration and necrosis at 2000 mg/kg), heart
`(myocardial degeneration and necrosis at ≥1500 mg/kg), teeth (1000 mg/kg), bone marrow
`(necrosis at 2000 mg/kg), and lymph nodes (2000 mg/kg) were identified as the target organs of
`toxicity in the rat. Some consistent neurological clinical signs (reduced activity, hunched
`posture, ataxia, tremor, and sporadic emesis) were present in all the dog studies at 50 mg/kg.
`Sitagliptin did not produce vascular/skin lesions in rhesus monkeys, as seen with some DPP4
`inhibitors, when administered at doses up to 100 mg/kg (~25X MRHD of 100 mg; based on
`AUC) for 3 months.
`
`The Glumetza® (metformin XR) label does not provide information regarding the nonclinical
`target organs of toxicity of metformin.
`
` A
`
` series of studies conducted by the sponsor in support of NDA 22-044 for the
`sitagliptin/metformin IR FDC (Janumet®) evaluated the potential toxicity of sitagliptin
`co-administered with metformin IR to dogs. The combination of sitagliptin (2-50 mg/kg) and
`metformin (50 mg/kg) in dogs resulted in more numerous and earlier deaths than observed with
`metformin alone. However, the combination of sitagliptin and a lower dose of metformin
`(20 mg/kg), which better approximates human exposure, resulted in no deaths and yielded no
`evidence of exacerbated toxicity. Although it was determined that the deaths at 50 mg/kg of
`metformin were due to metformin toxicity and not to the combination, the possibility of slight
`exacerbated toxicity with clinical high exposure to metformin (≥400 μM·h [AUC]) and clinical
`exposure to sitagliptin (≥10 μM·h [AUC]) could not be ruled out.
`7
`Genetic Toxicology
`No genetic toxicology studies were conducted with MK-0431A XR. The genotoxicity of sitagliptin
`and metformin, individually, were previously established in in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity
`studies. As summarized in the Janumet® (sitagliptin/metformin IR FDC) and Glumetza®
`(metformin XR) labels, neither drug product is genotoxic.
`
`According to the approved label for Janumet® (sitagliptin/metformin IR):
`Sitagliptin was not mutagenic or clastogenic with or without metabolic activation in the
`Ames bacterial mutagenicity assay, a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) chromosome
`aberration assay, an in vitro cytogenetics assay in CHO, an in vitro rat hepatocyte DNA
`alkaline elution assay, and an in vivo micronucleus assay.
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`12
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`According to the approved label for Glumetza® (metformin XR):
`
`Genotoxicity assessments in the Ames test, gene mutation test (mouse lymphoma cells),
`chromosomal aberrations test (human lymphocytes) and in vivo mouse micronucleus
`tests were negative.
`
`In support of this 505(b)(2) submission for MK-0431A XR, in vitro microbial mutagenesis and
`(”msitagliptin batch containing
`chromosomal aberration assays were conducted using a
`“"9 degradation products to qualify a
`am
`am in the drug product.
`degradation product of sitagliptin at the proposed limit 01
`
`7.1
`
`In Vitro Reverse Mutation Assay in Bacterial Cells (Ames)
`
`Microbial Mutagenesis Assay (TT #09-8168) - GLP
`
`09-8168
`Study No.:
`Study Report Location: EDR
`Conducting Laboratory and Merck Research Laboratories,
`Location: West Point, PA
`Date of Study Initiation:
`9 December 2009
`GLP Compliance: Yes
`QA Statement: Yes
`
`(5) (4)
`
`Drug, Lot #, and % Purity: MK-0431/sitagliptin (contains
`] degradates; artificially
`(m4). purity not
`degraded)
`applicable as material is artificially degraded
`
`Key Study Findings
`
`. A
`
`“9‘" batch of sitagliptin
`products was not mutagenic in the Ames test at concentrations
`
`(m4)
`
`up to 5000 ug/plate.
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`1 3
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Methods
`
`
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`Strains: TA100, TA1535, TA98, TA97a, and WP2urvrA
`pKM101
`Concentrations in Definitive Study: 100, 300, 1000, 3000, and 5000 µg/plate (with and
`without S9)
`Basis of Concentration Selection: Used doses up 5000 μg/plate (limit dose)
`Negative Control: Water, acidified with 1 mM HCl, pH ~4.0
`Positive Control: Salmonella strains and E. coli strain WP2 uvrA
`pKM101 (with and without S9): 2-aminoanthracene
`(2AA), 1 and 2 μg/plate with S9 and 2 and 5 μg/plate
`without S9
`Diagnostic mutagens (without S9): Sodium azide
`(0.75 μg/plate), 4-Nitroquinoline-N-oxide (4NQO;
`1 μg/plate); 2-Nitrofluorene (2NF; 1 μg/plate), and
`ICR-191, (1.5 μg/plate)
`S9 Mix: Liver from rats treated with phenobarbital and
`beta-naphthoflavone (MOLTOX, Inc.); 50 μL/plate,
`when appropriate
`Formulation/Vehicle: Acidified water
`Incubation & Sampling Time:
`Plates were incubated at 37oC for 48 hrs. Revertant
`colonies on the histidine or tryptophan deficient plates
`were counted and the supplemental plates examined
`for evidence of inhibition or contamination. Revertant
`colony counts on the test plates were averaged and
`compared with the appropriate control plate average.
`
`
`
`
`
`Judgment
`(cid:131) Positive: (1) a 2-fold or greater increase in number of revertant colonies, and (2) a
`dose-related increase in number of revertant colonies.
`Study Validity
`Dose selection for the plate incorporation assay was adequate based on the limit dose
`(i.e., 5000 μg/plate). All test article concentrations and concurrent negative and positive controls
`were carried out in triplicate plates. Four or more doses had no inhibition of bacterial lawn or
`revertant growth and there were at least 5 analyzable doses with and without S9. The dose
`formulations were within nominal concentrations. The negative and positive controls were within
`acceptable ranges, and the positive controls produced the expected responses.
`2-Aminoanthracene was the sole S9 positive control. The sponsor did not indicate that
`preliminary studies characterized the S9 with benzo[a]pyrene and 2-aminoanthracene were
`conducted.
`Results
`No precipitate was seen on the plates at any concentration tested. No inhibition of bacterial lawn
`or revertant growth was noted at any concentration tested. Artificially degraded MK-0431 and its
` degradation products did not produce 2-fold or greater
`increases in revertants relative to control. The positive control and diagnostic mutagens showed
`appropriate S9- and strain-dependent increases in revertants.
`
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`14
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Microbial Mutagenesis Assay: Results with Artificially Degraded MK-0431 (Sponsor’s
`Table)
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`
`
`
`Microbial Mutagenesis Assay: Results with Artificially Degraded MK-0431 (Sponsor’s
`Table)
`
`
`
`
`Microbial Mutagenesis Assay: Results with Positive Control Mutagens (Sponsor’s Table)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`15
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Microbial Mutagenesis Assay: Results with Positive Control Mutagens (Sponsor’s Table)
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`
`
`
`7.2
`
`In Vitro Chromosomal Aberration Assays in Mammalian Cells
`
`Assay for Chromosomal Aberrations In Vitro, in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
`(TT #09-8623) - GLP
`
`
`
`Study No.:
`09-8623
`Study Report Location:
`EDR
`Conducting Laboratory and
`Merck Research Laboratories,
`Location:
`West Point, PA
`Date of Study Initiation:
`9 December 2009
`GLP Compliance:
`Yes
`QA Statement:
`Yes
`Drug, Lot #, and % Purity: MK-0431/sitagliptin (contains
`
` degradates; artificially
`degraded), L-000224715-013D00, purity not
`applicable as material is artificially degraded
`
`Key Study Findings
`(cid:131) A
`batch of sitagliptin with
`degradation products did not induce chromosomal aberrations in the absence or
`presence of S9 in CHO cells.
` degradation
`In the cultures treated for 20 hours without S9, sitagliptin and its
`products caused an increase in polyploidy metaphases at 0.9 and 1 mg/mL (12-14%),
`which exceeded the historical control range for polyploidy (0-7%).
`
`(cid:131)
`
`
`
`Reviewer’s Comments
`The increase in polyploidy prompted the sponsor to re-evaluate the 20-hour treatment of the
`original chromosomal aberration assay conducted with an
` batch of sitagliptin in 2002
`as there was no report of endoreduplication or polyploidy in the 20-hour cultures in the original
`in vitro chromosomal aberration assay report (NDA 21-995); the results of the re-evaluation
`were submitted under IND 103183 (SDN23). The re-evaluation of the 20-hour treatment cultures
`showed an increase in polyploidy metaphases (10%) at the highest sitagliptin concentration
`
`Reference ID: 2950282
`
`16
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 202270
`
`Patricia Brundage
`
`evaluated (1 mg/mL), which exceeded historical control data. Given that an increase in
`polyploidy metaphases was observed with the
`(”"9 batches, the increase
`was considered to be attributable to sitagliptin, not the
`"'"" degradates.
`
`Based on the absence of mutagenesis and clastogenesis, the increase in polyploidy associated
`with sitagliptin is not due to a direct interaction with DNA but to an unidentified indirect
`mechanism. There is no particular cause for concern regarding the in vivo genotoxicity of the
`drug given the negative mouse bone marrow micronucleus study using up to

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket