throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`201281Orig1s000
`
`
`SUMMARY REVIEW
`
`
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`Cross-Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`
`Date
`January 26, 2012
`From
`Jean-Marc Guettier, M.D.
`m_ Cross-Disci line Team Leader Review
`NDA/BLA #
`201281/ Resubmission-Class 1
`
`Su lement#
`
`Boehrin . er In . elheim Phalmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`November 19", 2011
`Date of Submission
`Janua
`30 , 2012
`PDUFA Goal Date
`——
`Jentadueto®l
`Proprietary Name /
`Established (USAN) names
`
`Linagliptin and metformin hydrochloride fixed dose
`combination
`
`diabetes mellitus
`
`Dosage forms / Strength
`
`Oral tablets with the following dosage strengths:
`Linagliptin 2.5 mg / metformin 500 mg
`Linagliptin 2.5 mg / metformin 850 mg
`
`Linagliptin 2.5 mg / metformin 1000 mg
`To improve glycemic control in adults patients with type 2
`
`Proposed Indication(s)
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3077349
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is resubmitting (class-1 resubmission) the New
`Drug Application #201281 under section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic
`Act for the fixed-dose combination product linagliptin /metformin hydrochloride. The
`reference listed drug is the US approved Glucophage (metformin). The applicant was issued a
`complete response on November 16th 2011 due to deficiencies noted at a facility
`
` used for the testing of metformin hydrochloride and excipients
`contained in the final drug product. The applicant was informed that satisfactory resolution of
`these deficiencies would be needed before the product could be approved. To resolve this
`deficiency the applicant notifies the Agency that the
`
`testing facility has been removed, that the testing of metformin hydrochloride will be
`performed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG (Ingelheim, Germany) and that
`the testing of excipients will be performed by
`
`
`
`for
`information
`limited new safety
`that only
`the applicant states
`In addition,
`linagliptin/metformin FDC has been received since submission of the four-month safety
`update data and that these new data do not reveal significant changes or findings relevant to
`the safety profile of the product. The product is not currently marketed outside of the US.
`There are no clinical data in this resubmission.
`2. Background
`
`All disciplines, with the exception of CMC, involved in the first review cycle (January 19th
`2011-November 19th 2011) recommended approval of the NDA. Refer to Dr. Irony’s October
`15th 2011 CDTL memo for details.
`3. CMC/Device
`
`The Office of Manufacturing & Product Quality (OMPQ) has determined that the new
`facilities employed to manufacture and test the drug substances and drug product are
`acceptable. Chemistry and OMPQ recommend approval.
`4. Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology
`No new information. Refer to Dr. Irony’s CDTL memo.
`5. Clinical Pharmacology/Biopharmaceutics
`No new information. Refer to Dr. Irony’s CDTL memo.
`6. Clinical Microbiology
`No new information. Refer to Dr. Irony’s CDTL memo.
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3077349
`
`2
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Cross Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`7. Clinical/Statistical- Efficacy
`No new information. Refer to Dr. Irony’s CDTL memo.
`8. Safety
`No new information. Refer to Dr. Irony’s CDTL memo.
`9. Advisory Committee Meeting
`No new information. Refer to Dr. Irony’s CDTL memo.
`10.
`Pediatrics
`No new information. Refer to Dr. Irony’s CDTL memo.
`11.
`Other Relevant Regulatory Issues
`No new information. Refer to Dr. Irony’s CDTL memo.
`12.
`Labeling
`Jentadueto has been conditionally approved as the proprietary trade name by the Division of
`Medication Error Prevention and Analysis. Labeling discussion around the pregnancy
`category for metformin occurred during the last review cycle. From these discussions and
`review of the clinical experience with metformin published in the literature it was determined
`that metformin should be designated as a Pregnancy Category B drug and that language to
`summarize the nonclinical findings be included in section 8.1 of the label. This pregnancy
`category is consistent with other approved metformin labels. Refer to Dr. Irony’s CDTL
`memo for details. Minor editing changes to the label were sent to the sponsor at the time this
`memorandum was written.
`13.
`Recommendations/Risk Benefit Assessment
`
`• Recommended Regulatory Action
`APPROVAL
`• Risk Benefit Assessment
`Refer to Dr. Irony’s CDTL memo.
`• Recommendation for Postmarketing Risk Evaluation and Management Strategies
`No new safety findings to trigger the need for REMS
`• Recommendation for other Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments
`No new safety findings to trigger the need for Postmarketing Requirements and
`Commitments
`• Recommended Comments to Applicant
`None
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3077349
`
`3
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`JEAN-MARC P GUETTIER
`01/26/2012
`
`MARY H PARKS
`01/26/2012
`concur
`
`Reference ID: 3077349
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket