throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`200678Orig1s000
`
`
`MEDICAL REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`
`Public Health Service
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MEMO TO THE FILE
`
`NDA
`
`Sponsor
`
`Drug Product
`
`Date of Submission
`
`PDUFA goal date
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Silver Spring, MD 20993-002
`
`200678
`
`Bristol-Myers Squibb
`
`Kombiglyze XR (saxagliptin/metformin extended release) fixed dose
`combination tablets
`
`December 29, 2009
`
`October 29, 2010
`
`
`
`
`Kombiglyze XR is a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of saxagliptin and metformin HCl extended-
`release (met XR). The drug product is a tablet
`
`
`
`
` The
`
`
`
`proposed dosage strengths are:
`• Saxagliptin 5 mg/Metformin XR 500 mg
`• Saxagliptin 5 mg/Metformin XR 1000 mg
`• Saxagliptin 2.5 mg/Metformin XR 1000 mg
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The development of a FDC applies the policy outlined in 21 CFR 300.50 in which “two or more drugs
`may be combined in a single dosage form when each component makes a contribution to the claimed
`effects and the dosage of each component (amount, frequency, duration) is such that the combination is
`safe and effective for a significant patient population requiring such concurrent therapy as defined in the
`labeling for the drug”. In the development of FDC products for the treatment of anti-diabetic agents, the
`applicant would need to provide clinical trial data demonstrating that each of the individual components
`makes a contribution to the claimed effects of the FDC, and that the combination is acceptably safe. Of
`late, it has not been unusual for many companies to develop FDC of two approved anti-diabetic agents.
`In this setting, if clinical efficacy and safety data are available from a trial showing the individual
`components co-administered provide greater efficacy (and are safe) than the individual components alone,
`it may be sufficient for the FDC development program to only demonstrate bioequivalence between the
`FDC and individual components co-administered. This BE study would serve as the bridge between the
`FDC tablet and the clinical efficacy and safety trial of the individual components.
`
`This NDA is a 505(b)(1) application as the applicant is the NDA holder for all drugs relied upon in
`support of efficacy and safety of the FDC. These NDAs include:
`• NDA 22-350 Onglyza (saxagliptin) approved at doses of 2.5 mg and 5.0 mg
`• NDA 20-357 Glucophage (metformin HCl) approved at doses of 500 mg, 850 mg, and 1000 mg
`• NDA 21-202 Glucophage XR (metformin HCl) approved at doses of 500 mg and 750 mg
`
`
`Although it would seem that this NDA is straightforward since Bristol-Myers Squibb has full right of
`reference to all of the referenced NDA, some of the data submitted did not involve a direct bridge
`between the FDC and the referenced product relied upon for labeling. Instead, an indirect bridge was
`
`Reference ID: 2860229
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`relied upon in which an intermediate drug product served as the link between the FDC and the drug
`product studied in the clinical efficacy and safety trial.
`
`This memo will only summarize the bridging clinical data and what has led FDA to conclude an FDC
`product may be approved, even if relying on indirect bridging data. Please see Dr. Joffe’s CDTL memo
`and the Clinical Pharmacology review for complete details of the clinical program.
`
`All clinical efficacy and safety data for saxagliptin plus metformin HCl summarized in this label are from
`NDA 22-350 and involves the immediate-release formulation of metformin HCl. There is no direct
`bridge between Kombiglyze XR and these two individual components nor have there been any clinical
`trials conducted with Kombiglyze XR. Instead the following pivotal BE studies were conducted:
`
`Pivotal BE Study
`CV181111
`
`Test
`FDC of saxagliptin 5 mg and 500
`mg metformin XR manufactured
`in Mt Vernon, IN
`FDC of saxagliptin 5 mg and 1000
`mg metformin XR manufactured
`in Mt Vernon, IN
`
`Comparators
`Marketed Saxagliptin 5 mg and
`metformin XR 500 mg co-
`administered
`Marketed saxagliptin 5 mg and
`metformin XR 500 mg x 2 co-
`administered
`
`CV181112
`
`
`Metformin XR
`from FDC
`
`
`As noted in the review by Dr. Jain and Choe, the FDC of saxagliptin 5mg/metXR 500 mg and saxagliptin
`5 mg/metXR 1000 mg were bioequivalent to their individual components co-administered. A biowaiver
`was granted for the lower dosage strength of saxagliptin 2.5 mg/metXR 1000 mg. These two studies
`allow us to conclude that when the FDC is administered, a similar PK profile can be expected to when
`saxagliptin and metformin XR are co-administered. However, these two studies do not provide a direct
`bridge to clinical efficacy and safety data
`.
`
`As noted in the reviews of Drs. Joffe and Peneva, the efficacy and safety data for saxagliptin plus
`metformin, in treatment-naïve and as add-on therapy, are from trials using metformin immediate-release
`formulation. To bridge these data to the Kombiglyze XR, the applicant had to rely on the Glucophage
`and Glucophage XR NDAs in which these two different formulations of metformin were evaluated. In
`her addendum to the original Clinical Pharmacology review, Drs. Jain and Choe summarize the different
`PK characteristics between these two metformin formulations. Although the Cmax for Glucophage XR is
`lower than Glucophage by approximately 20%, the extent of absorption (AUC) is comparable between
`these two drug products with the ratio of the geometric means and accompanying 90% CI being 1.00
`(0.93, 1.07). The differences in PK profiles were not considered clinically relevant as a 24-week clinical
`trial comparing efficacy between patients continued on metformin immediate-release versus being
`switched to metformin extended-release did not appear to have marked differences in efficacy. Despite
`this, the label for Glucophage/Glucophage XR does recommend monitoring of glycemic control when
`switching from the immediate-release to the extended-release formulation.
`
`The following diagram depicts the direct and indirect bridging of data to support a conclusion that
`Kombiglyze XR should result in similar efficacy as saxagliptin plus metformin IR.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Metformin XR
`
`
`Metformin IR
`
`
`Reference ID: 2860229
`
`2
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`
`It not uncommon that multiple bridging studies are conducted to link clinical data, even within a single
`development program as drug products undergo different formulation changes or scale up in
`manufacturing. However, there has been a noticeable increase in applications for FDCs for the treatment
`of diabetes and while the rationale for their development is reasonable (majority of diabetics are on
`multiple anti-diabetic therapies), these products are convenience products with no evidence of improved
`patient compliance resulting in better diabetes management. Consequently, labeling for a FDC product
`should accurately summarize the source from which clinical efficacy and safety data are derived. In the
`case of Kombiglyze XR, the following text has been added to Section 14, Clinical Studies:
`
`There have been no clinical efficacy or safety studies conducted with KOMBIGLYZE XR to characterize
`its effect on hemoglobin A1c (A1C) reduction. Bioequivalence of KOMBIGLYZE XR with coadministered
`saxagliptin and metformin hydrochloride extended-release tablets has been demonstrated; however,
`relative bioavailability studies between KOMBIGLYZE XR and coadministered saxagliptin and
`metformin hydrochloride immediate-release tablets have not been conducted. The metformin
`hydrochloride extended-release tablets and metformin hydrochloride immediate-release tablets have a
`similar extent of absorption (as measured by AUC) while peak plasma levels of extended-release tablets
`are approximately 20% lower than those of immediate-release tablets at the same dose.
`
`The Dosage and Administration section of labeling also recommends appropriate monitoring of glycemic
`control after any change in diabetes therapy, specifically when switching of metformin formulations.
`
`
`Reference ID: 2860229
`
`3
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`MARY H PARKS
`11/04/2010
`
`Reference ID: 2860229
`
`

`

`CLINICAL REVIEW
`
`Application Type 505(b)(1)
`Application Number(s) NDA 200678
`Priority or Standard Standard
`
`Submit Date(s)
`
`Received Date(s) 12/29/09
`PDUFA Goal Date 10/29/10
`Division / Office DMEP
`
`Reviewer Name(s) Arlet V. Nedeltcheva
`Review Completion Date 08/20/2010
`
`(Saxagliptin + Metformin XR) FDC
`Established Name
`
`(Proposed) Trade Name
`Therapeutic Class DPP4 inhibitor and a biguanide
`Applicant BMS
`
`
`Formulation(s)
`
`5 mg saxagliptin/500 mg metformin XR,
`2.5 mg saxagliptin/1000 mg metformin XR,
`5 mg saxagliptin/1000 mg metformin XR
`Dosing Regimen
`once daily in the evening
`Indication(s) As an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve
`glycemic control in T2DM when treatment with
`both saxagliptin and metformin is appropriate.
`Intended Population(s) Type 2 Diabetes mellitus
`
`
`
`Template Version: March 6, 2009
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Arlet V. Nedeltcheva, M.D.
`NDA 200678
`
`
`
` saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC
`
`Table of Contents
`
`2
`
`1 RECOMMENDATIONS/RISK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT......................................... 7
`1.1 Recommendation on Regulatory Action ............................................................. 7
`1.2 Risk Benefit Assessment.................................................................................... 7
`1.3 Recommendations for Post-market Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies .. 7
`1.4 Recommendations for Post-market Requirements and Commitments............... 7
`INTRODUCTION AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND ........................................ 7
`2.1 Product Information ............................................................................................ 8
`2.2 Tables of Currently Available Treatments for Proposed Indications ................... 9
`2.3 Availability of Proposed Active Ingredient in the United States ........................ 10
`2.4
`Important Safety Issues With Consideration to Related Drugs......................... 11
`2.5 Summary of Pre-submission Regulatory Activity Related to Submission ......... 11
`3 ETHICS AND GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICES....................................................... 11
`3.1 Submission Quality and Integrity ...................................................................... 11
`3.2 Compliance with Good Clinical Practices ......................................................... 11
`3.3 Financial Disclosures........................................................................................ 12
`4 SIGNIFICANT EFFICACY/SAFETY ISSUES RELATED TO OTHER REVIEW
`DISCIPLINES ......................................................................................................... 12
`4.1 Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls ............................................................ 12
`4.2 Clinical Microbiology......................................................................................... 13
`4.3 Preclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology ............................................................... 13
`4.4 Clinical Pharmacology...................................................................................... 13
`5 SOURCES OF CLINICAL DATA............................................................................ 15
`5.1 Tables of Studies/Clinical Trials ....................................................................... 16
`5.2 Review Strategy ............................................................................................... 17
`5.3 Discussion of Individual Studies/Clinical Trials................................................. 18
`6 REVIEW OF EFFICACY......................................................................................... 25
`
`6.1 INDICATION........................................................................................................... 25
`6.1.1 Methods ..................................................................................................... 25
`6.1.2 Demographics............................................................................................ 26
`6.1.3 Subject Disposition .................................................................................... 30
`6.1.4 Analysis of Primary Endpoint(s) ................................................................. 34
`SECONDARY OUTPOINT – FASTING PLASMA GLUCOSE ..................................... 38
`6.1.5 Analysis of Secondary Endpoints(s)........................................................... 41
`6.1.6 Subpopulations .......................................................................................... 41
`7 REVIEW OF SAFETY............................................................................................. 41
`
`2
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Arlet V. Nedeltcheva, M.D.
`NDA 200678
`
` saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC
`
`
`
`7.1 Methods............................................................................................................ 41
`7.1.1 Studies/Clinical Trials Used to Evaluate Safety ......................................... 42
`7.1.2 Categorization of Adverse Events.............................................................. 42
`7.1.3 Pooling of Data Across Studies/Clinical Trials to Estimate and Compare
`Incidence.................................................................................................... 42
`7.2 Adequacy of Safety Assessments .................................................................... 42
`7.2.1 Overall Exposure at Appropriate Doses/Durations and Demographics of
`Target Populations..................................................................................... 42
`7.2.2 Explorations for Dose Response................................................................ 42
`7.3 Major Safety Results ........................................................................................ 43
`7.3.1 Deaths........................................................................................................ 43
`7.3.2 Nonfatal Serious Adverse Events .............................................................. 46
`7.3.3 Dropouts and/or Discontinuations: AEs leading to discontinuation ........... 60
`7.3.4 Significant Adverse Events (adverse events of interest) ............................ 67
`7.3.5 Submission Specific Primary Safety Concerns .......................................... 79
`7.4 Supportive Safety Results ................................................................................ 79
`7.4.2 Laboratory Findings ................................................................................... 82
`7.4.3 Vital Signs.................................................................................................. 82
`7.4.4 Electrocardiograms (ECGs) ....................................................................... 82
`7.5 Other Safety Explorations................................................................................. 83
`7.6 Additional Safety Evaluations ........................................................................... 83
`7.6.1 Human Carcinogenicity.............................................................................. 83
`7.6.2 Human Reproduction and Pregnancy Data................................................ 84
`7.6.3 Pediatrics and Assessment of Effects on Growth ...................................... 84
`8 POST-MARKET EXPERIENCE ............................................................................. 84
`
`9 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................ 84
`9.1 Labeling Recommendations............................................................................. 84
`9.2 Advisory Committee Meeting............................................................................ 85
`
`
`
`3
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Arlet V. Nedeltcheva, M.D.
`NDA 200678
`
`
`
` saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC
`
`Table of Tables
`
`Table 1 The available treatments for Type 2 Diabetes.................................................... 9
`Table 2 Listing of saxagliptin clinical studies that support the FDC NDA ...................... 16
`Table 3 Study CV181038 demographics (Randomized Analysis set) ........................... 26
`Table 4 Study CV181054 demographics (Randomized analysis set)............................ 27
`Table 5 CV181056 demographics (Randomized analysis set)...................................... 28
`Table 6 CV181066 demographics................................................................................. 29
`Table 7 CV181064 demographics................................................................................. 29
`Table 8 Summary table based on ST + LT (LT is complete for all studies below except
`for Study 181054) - Major reason for discontinuation (n, %) in some of the
`studies reviewed for this NDA. Further details are provided for each study
`separately below............................................................................................ 30
`Table 9 Disposition of the subjects in ST + LT treatment period and primary reason for
`discontinuation from study ............................................................................. 31
`Table 10 Disposition of Subjects in ST + LT treatment period and primary reason for
`discontinuation from Study CV181039........................................................... 31
`Table 11 Disposition of the subjects CV 1810156........................................................ 32
`Table 12 Disposition of subjects CV181066 randomized and treated ........................... 32
`Table 13 Disposition of Subjects from study CV 181064............................................... 32
`Table 14 Disposition of the subjects in Year 1 of Study CV181054 (randomized and
`treated) .......................................................................................................... 33
`Table 15 Change from baseline to week 76 in HbA1C study CV181038 (LOCF) during
`ST + LT period ............................................................................................... 34
`Table 16 Fasting Plasma glucose Change from baseline to week 24 (LOCF) during ST
`treatment period of study 181038 .................................................................. 35
`Table 17 Change in HbA1C from baseline to week 76 (LOCF) during ST+LT treatment
`period study of study CV181039.................................................................... 36
`Table 18HbA1C (%) results for ST period of study CV181039 using LOCF.................. 36
`Table 19 Fasting plasma glucose Change from baseline to week 76 (LOCF) during ST +
`LT treatment period of study CV181039 ........................................................ 37
`Table 20 Change from baseline to week 24 (ST) in fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)
`using LOCF.................................................................................................... 37
`Table 21 HbA1C change from baseline at week 18 (LOCF) of the study CV181056 ... 38
`Table 22 Change from baseline fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 18
`(LOCF) of the study CV181056...................................................................... 38
`Table 23 24 hour mean weighted glucose (MWG-mg/dL) - change from baseline at
`week 4 (LOCF)............................................................................................... 39
`Table 24 4-hour mean weighted postprandial plasma glucose- changes from baseline at
`week 4 (LOCF)............................................................................................... 39
`Table 25 Change in HbA1C (%) from baseline to week 52 (LOCF) .............................. 40
`Table 26 Change in 120-minute postprandial glucose from baseline to week 52 (LOCF)
`....................................................................................................................... 40
`Table 27 Summary table of the deaths in the studies reviewed for this NDA................ 43
`
`4
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Arlet V. Nedeltcheva, M.D.
`NDA 200678
`
` saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC
`
`
`Table 28 Deaths: Study CV181039 (treated patients)................................................... 44
`Table 29 Deaths in study CV181054 (treated subjects) ................................................ 45
`Table 30 Summary table of the SAEs in the studies reviewed for this NDA.................. 46
`Table 31 Serious adverse events by System organ class ST+LT study CV181038
`(treated subjects) ........................................................................................... 47
`Table 32 New SAEs not included in the interim study report for CV181038 (treated
`subjects) ........................................................................................................ 47
`Table 33 Serious Adverse Events during the ST + completed LT period (treated
`subjects) CV181039....................................................................................... 49
`Table 34 SAEs since the interim LT CSR reporting period (treated subjects) CV1810139
`....................................................................................................................... 50
`Table 35 SAEs in CV181056 (treated subjects) ........................................................... 53
`Table 36 SAEs during study CV181064 (24 weeks) ..................................................... 54
`Table 37 SAEs CV181054 (treated subjects) for ST (52 weeks)................................... 55
`Table 38 New data for SAEs reported for CV181014 since 120- day safety update for
`Onglyza NDA ................................................................................................. 56
`Table 39 SAEs during ST + LT period of study CV181014 ........................................... 58
`Table 40 Adverse events leading to discontinuation from entire ST + LT study period of
`CV181038 study by SOC and PT .................................................................. 61
`Table 41 AEs leading to discontinuation during ST + LT (old and new data) of study
`CV1810139.................................................................................................... 62
`Table 42 AEs leading to discontinuation during 18 week treatment period of study
`CV181056...................................................................................................... 62
`Table 43 Subjects who discontinued due to AEs during 24 week study CV181064...... 63
`Table 44 Confirmed hypoglycemia by predefined PT during the ST + LT treatment
`period (new + old data) study CV181038....................................................... 67
`Table 45 Confirmed hypoglycemia - by PT during ST + LT treatment period (old + new
`data)............................................................................................................... 67
`Table 46 Hypoglycemic adverse events by PT of study CV181056 .............................. 67
`Table 47 Hypoglycemic adverse events by PT in CV181066........................................ 68
`Table 48 Reported hypoglycemic adverse events by PT during ST treatment period in
`CV181054 study ............................................................................................ 68
`Table 49 Skin disorders by PT during ST + LT period (new data) of study CV181038 69
`Table 50 Skin disorders by PT during the ST + LT treatment period (old + new data) of
`study CV1810138 .......................................................................................... 69
`Table 51 Skin disorders by PT in study CV1810166 ..................................................... 69
`Table 52 Skin disorders (new data) study CV181014 ................................................... 69
`Table 53 Localized edema AEs by PT during ST + LT treatment (old + new data) period
`of study CV181039 ........................................................................................ 71
`Table 54 AEs of interest: Infections during the ST + LT period (old + new data) study
`CV1810138.................................................................................................... 72
`Table 55 The most common AEs of Infections SOC (incidence > 2 %) (old + new data)
`by PT during study CV181039 ....................................................................... 73
`Table 56 AEs of interest of Infections SOC during study CV181056............................. 74
`
`5
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Arlet V. Nedeltcheva, M.D.
`NDA 200678
`
` saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC
`
`
`Table 57 Most common AEs of interest of Infections SOC during study CV 181066 ... 74
`Table 58 Most common AEs of interest of Infection SOC during study CV181054 ....... 74
`Table 59 Most common AEs with incidence > 5 % during study CV181014 ................. 81
`
`6
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Arlet V. Nedeltcheva, M.D.
`NDA 200678
`
`
`
` saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC
`
`1 Recommendations/Risk Benefit Assessment
`
`1.1
`
`Recommendation on Regulatory Action
`
`From a clinical perspective, the application is recommended for approval.
`
`1.2
`
`Risk Benefit Assessment
`
`The saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC contains two approved medications with known risks in a
`single tablet. The benefit of the FDC is the convenience of the patients taking less pills, which
`may decrease noncompliance to drug treatment.
`
`1.3
`
`Recommendations for Post-market Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies
`
`There are no Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) in place for saxagliptin or
`metformin and no new safety issues were identified with co-administration. Therefore, there is
`no need for a REMS for this FDC.
`
`1.4
`
`Recommendations for Post-market Requirements and Commitments
`
`There are several required postmarketing studies for saxagliptin. For additional information refer
`to the NDA 22350 Approval letter, date July 31, 2009. No distinct required postmarketing
`studies are needed for the FDC.
`
`2
`
`Introduction and Regulatory Background
`
`Saxagliptin is an inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) that was developed for treatment of
`hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inactivates the
`incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic
`polypeptide (GIP). Those incretin hormones are released from the gastrointestinal tract during
`meals and stimulate insulin release from the pancreatic beta-cell in a glucose-dependent manner.
`
`DPP4 inhibitors increase the levels of intact glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). The intact GLP-1
`regulates blood glucose via stimulation of glucose-dependent insulin secretion, delaying of
`gastric emptying, inhibiting of glucagon secretion, and as a result of all these actions, improves
`the pre-prandial and postprandial glycemic profile.
`
`Metformin is a biguanide, that decreases elevated blood glucose with predominant effect on
`fasting hyperglycemia, reduces hepatic glucose output, improves peripheral glucose uptake and
`utilization, leads to improved insulin sensitivity.
`The combination therapy with DPP4 inhibitor and metformin lowers the glucose via different
`mechanisms of action.
`
`7
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Arlet V. Nedeltcheva, M.D.
`NDA 200678
`
` saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC
`
`
`
`Metformin XR is proposed to be used as the metformin component in the fixed-dose
`saxagliptin/metformin product. This gives an advantage of a saxagliptin/metformin XR fixed-
`dose combination product of being dosed once-daily in the evening , which may improve patient
`compliance over a twice daily dosing product if metformin immediate-release (IR) was used.
`
`2.1
`
`Product Information
`
`Saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC tablets have been developed at dose strengths of 5 mg
`saxagliptin/ 500 mg metformin XR, 2.5 mg saxagliptin/ 1000 mg metformin XR, and 5 mg
`saxagliptin/ 1000 mg metformin XR.
`
`In the saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC tablets,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Drug class: DPP4 inhibitor (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor) and a biguanide
`
`Established name: saxagliptin and metformin XR FDC
`
`Proposed trade name:
`
`Target patient population and indication: Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus
`
`Formulation: Film coated tablets for oral administration
`
`Dosage forms and strengths for saxagliptin/metformin HCl extended-release available:
`• saxagliptin/metformin HCl XR 5mg/500 mg tablets are light brown, capsule-shaped, film-
`coated tablets with “5/500” printed on one side and “4221” printed on the reverse side
`in blue ink
`• saxagliptin/metformin HCl XR 5 mg/1000 mg tablets are pink, capsule-shaped, film-
`coated tablets with “5/1000” printed on one side and “4223” printed on the reverse side,
`in blue ink
`• saxagliptin/metformin HCl XR 2.5 mg /1000 mg tablets are yellow, capsule-shaped, film-
`coated tablets with “2.5/1000” printed on one side and “4222” printed on the reverse
`side, in blue ink
`Proposed dosing: The dosage of antihyperglycemic therapy should be individualized based on
`the effectiveness and tolerability in each patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. When the
`saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC is considered appropriate treatment by the physician, the
`recommended starting dose of saxagliptin is 2.5 mg or 5 mg once daily and the recommended
`starting dose of metformin XR is 500 mg once daily, which can be gradually titrated to 2000 mg
`once daily to reduce the gastrointestinal side effects associated with metformin. The maximum
`
`8
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Arlet V. Nedeltcheva, M.D.
`NDA 200678
`
` saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC
`
`
`dose is saxagliptin 5 mg /metformin XR 2000 mg taken as two 2.5 mg/1000 mg tablets once daily
`with the evening meal.
`
`Proposed indication: saxagliptin/ metformin XR FDC is indicated as an adjunct to diet and
`exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus when treatment with
`both saxagliptin and metformin is appropriate.
`
`2.2
`
`Tables of Currently Available Treatments for Proposed Indications
`
`Table 1 The available treatments for Type 2 Diabetes
`Drug class
`Drug Mechanism
`of action
`
`Metformin
`
`Biguanides
`
`
`
`
`
`Sufonylureas
`
`
`
`Thiazolidinediones
`
`
`Insulin
`
`
`
`
`
`Glimepiride
`Glyburide
`Glipizide
`
`Rosiglitazone
`Pioglitazone
`
`Lispro
`NPH insulin
`Glargine
`
`Alpha-glucosidase
`inhibitors
`
`
`Acarbose
`Miglitol
`
`Repaglinide
`Nateglinide
`Pramlintide
`
`Meglitides
`
`Amylin analogues
`
`
`
`
`Decrease
`hepatic
`glucose
`production
`Increase
`insulin
`sensitivity
`Insulin
`secretagogue
`
`Increases
`insulin
`sensitivity
`Stimulates
`glucose
`uptake
`in muscle and
`adipose
`tissue
`Slow GI
`absorption of
`carbohydrates
`
`Insulin
`secretagogue
`Slow gastric
`emptying
`Suppresses
`glucagon
`
`9
`
`HbA1c
`(%)
`decrease*
`
`
`
` 1.5
`
`Advantage
`
`Disadvantage
`
`Weight
`neutral
`Inexpensive
`
`GI side effects
`Lactic acidosis
`Contraindicated
`in renal failure
`
` 1.5 Inexpensive
`
`0.5-1.4
`
`
`
`1.5-2.5
`
`Lower risk of
`hypoglycemia
`
`No dose limit
`Inexpensive
`Improve lipid
`profile
`
`
`
`0.5-0.8
`
`1-1.5
`
`
`
`
` 0.5-1.0
`
`Weight
`neutral
`
`Short
`duration
`
`
`
`Weight loss
`
`Hypoglycemia
`Weight gain
`
`Fluid retention
`Weight gain
`Expensive
`Injections
`Frequent
`monitoring
`Hypoglycemia
`Weight gain
`
`Frequent GI
`side effects
`TID dosing
`Expensive
`TID dosing
`Expensive
`TID dosing
`GI side effects
`Expensive
`Limited
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Arlet V. Nedeltcheva, M.D.
`NDA 200678
`
` saxagliptin/metformin XR FDC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GLP-1 analogues
`
`Exenatide
`
`experience
`
`
`
`
`
`0.5-1.0
`
`Weight loss
`Lower risk of
`hypoglycemia
`except when
`used with
`insulin
`secretagogues
`
`GI side effects
`Expensive
`Limited
`clinical
`experience
`Pancreatitis
`
`
`secretion
`Promotes
`satiety
`Decreases
`appetite
`Stimulated
`glucose-
`
`
`dependent
`insulin
`release
`Slows gastric
`emptying
`Inhibits
`glucagon
`secretion
`Reduces food
`intake
`Inhibits the
`enzyme DPP-
`IV
`
`prolonging
`the action of
`
`endogenous
`GLP-1 and
`GIP
`Unknown
`
`DPP-IV inhibitors Sitagliptin
`Saxagliptin
`
`Bile acid
`seques

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket