throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`200678Orig1s000
`
`
`MICROBIOLOGY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Product Quality Microbiology Review
`
`28 SEP 2010
`
`
`
`
`
`
`200-678
`
`
`NDA:
`
`Drug Product Name
`Proprietary:
` (proposed)
`
`Non-proprietary: Saxagliptin/metformin HCl extended-release
`
`Assigned to Reviewer
`17 FEB 2010
`N/A
`N/A
`
`
`Review Number:
`
`
`Dates of Submission(s) Covered by this Review
`Submit
`Received
`Review Request
`29 DEC 2009
`29 DEC 2009
`2 FEB 2010
`23 APR 2010
`23 APR 2010
`N/A
`24 SEP 2010
`24 SEP 2010
`N/A
`
`1
`
`
`Applicant/Sponsor
`Name:
`Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
`
`
`Address:
`P.O. Box 4000
`
`
`
`
` Princeton, NJ 08543-4000
`Representative:
`Pamela J. Smith, M.D.
`Telephone:
`
`609-252-5228
`
`
`Name of Reviewer:
`
`Conclusion:
`
`
`
`
`Jessica G. Cole
`
`Recommend approval.
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Microbiology Review #1
`
`
`NDA 200-678
`
`
`
`
`A.
`
`Product Quality Microbiology Data Sheet
`1.
`TYPE OF SUBMISSION: Original NDA
`
`2.
`
`SUBMISSION PROVIDES FOR: New fixed-dose combination product.
`
`MANUFACTURING SITE: Bristol-Myers Squibb
`
`
`
`
` 4601 Highway 62 East
`
`
`
`
` Mount Vernon, IN 47620 USA
`
`DOSAGE FORM, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION AND
`STRENGTH/POTENCY:
`• Oral tablet
`• 5/500 mg, 5/1000 mg, 2.5/1000 mg saxagliptin/metformin HCL-
`XR
`
`METHOD(S) OF STERILIZATION:
`
` oral tablet.
`
`PHARMACOLOGICAL CATEGORY: Indicated for Type 2 diabetes
`treatment.
`
`3.
`
`
`
`4.
`
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`B.
`
` A
`
`
`SUPPORTING/RELATED DOCUMENTS: None.
`
`REMARKS:
`C.
`The following microbiology information request was included in the 74-day letter to the applicant.
`Reviewer Comment
`Please provide the following information:
`1. The
` in the finished drug product.
`2. The microbial limits test validation studies or a summary of these studies.
`3. The microbial limits testing protocols 5450A, 249965, 249966, and 249967.
`4. A justification for only performing microbial limits testing
` during routine
`production.
`
` response was received 23 April 2010 and the information was incorporated into the relevant sections of
`this review.
`
` A
`
` second comment was sent to the sponsor through the project manager on 7/7/10:
`Reviewer Comment
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`. The product specification should
`state that the product will meet the requirements of USP<1111>, if tested. These process controls, tests and
`acceptance criteria should be identified in the batch release criteria, and include, for example:
`
`
`• Microbial limits data for critical raw materials,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 10
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 200-678
`
`
`•
`
`Microbiology Review #1
`
`
`) that may affect product quality
`
`
`
`• Microbiological environmental monitoring data for critical processing steps that can be related to
`the batch, and
`In-process control parameters
`microbiology.
`
`
`In addition, microbial limits testing should be performed at the initial time point (at a minimum) on
`stability samples.
`
` A
`
` response was received on 24 September and the response was incorporated into the relevant sections of
`this review.
`
`filename: N200678R1.doc
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 10
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Microbiology Review #1
`
`
`NDA 200-678
`
`Executive Summary
`
`
`Recommendations
`
`A.
`
`Recommendation on Approvability – Recommended for
`approval on the basis of product quality microbiology.
`
`Recommendations on Phase 4 Commitments and/or
`Agreements, if Approvable – Not applicable.
`
`
`Summary of Microbiology Assessments
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`
`
`B.
`
`A.
`
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Brief Description of the Manufacturing Processes that relate to
`Product Quality Microbiology – The drug product is a
`
`tablet manufactured
`
`
`
`Brief Description of Microbiology Deficiencies – Not applicable.
`
`Assessment of Risk Due to Microbiology Deficiencies – Not
`applicable.
`
`Reviewer's Signature _____________________________
`
`
`
`
`Jessica G. Cole, Ph.D.
`
`Endorsement Block _____________________________
`
`
`
`
`Stephen Langille, Ph.D.
`
`
`
` Senior Microbiology Reviewer
`
`
`CC Block
`N/A
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 10
`
`
`
`
`III. Administrative
`
`
`A.
`
`
`B.
`
`
`
`
`C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`6 Page(s) have been Withheld in
`Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately
`following this page
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`JESSICA COLE
`09/29/2010
`
`STEPHEN E LANGILLE
`09/29/2010
`
`Reference ID: 2842556
`
`

`

`PRODUCT QUALITY MICROBIOLOGY FILING CHECKLIST
`NDA Number: 200678
`Applicant: Bristol-Myers
`Letter Date: 12/29/2009
`Squibb
`NDA Type: Standard
`
`Stamp Date: 12/29/2009
`
`Comments
`
`
`
`
`
`Protocols for microbial
`limits testing not
`provided.
`
`
`Not applicable
`
`.
`
`
`
`No information is
`provided on the
`verification studies for
`microbial limits testing.
`
`Not applicable.
`
`
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`Drug Name:
`Saxagliptin/Metformin XR
`
`The following are necessary to initiate a review of the NDA application:
`Content Parameter
`Yes No
`
`
`Is the product quality microbiology information described
`in the NDA and organized in a manner to allow substantive
`review to begin? Is it legible, indexed, and/or paginated
`adequately?
`
`2 Has the applicant submitted an overall description of the
`manufacturing processes and microbiological controls used
`in the manufacture of the drug product?
`3 Has the applicant submitted protocols and results of
`validation studies concerning microbiological control
`processes used in the manufacture of the drug product?
`4 Are any study reports or published articles in a foreign
`language? If yes, has the translated version been included
`in the submission for review?
`5 Has the applicant submitted preservative effectiveness
`studies (if applicable) and container-closure integrity
`studies?
`6 Has the applicant submitted microbiological specifications
`for the drug product and a description of the test methods?
`7 Has the applicant submitted the results of analytical method
`verification studies?
`
`8 Has the applicant submitted all special/critical studies/data
`requested during pre-submission meetings and/or
`discussions?
`Is this NDA fileable? If not, then describe why.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`Additional Comments: Please provide the protocols (5450A, 249965, 249966, and 249967) and
`the validation studies for the microbial limits tests.
`
`
`
`
`Jessica G. Cole, Ph.D.
`
`
`Bryan S. Riley, Ph.D. Senior Review Microbiologist
`
`X
`
`
`
`
`
` 2/3/2010
`
`Date
`
`
`
`Date
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Application
`Type/Number
`--------------------
`NDA-200678
`
`Submission
`Type/Number
`--------------------
`ORIG-1
`
`Submitter Name
`
`Product Name
`
`--------------------
`BRISTOL MYERS
`SQUIBB
`
`------------------------------------------
` (saxagliptin +
`metformin XR) Tablets
`
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`JESSICA COLE
`02/03/2010
`
`BRYAN S RILEY
`02/03/2010
`I concur.
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket