throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`022410Orig1s000
`
`
`
`PROPRIETARY NAME REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Date:
`
`To:
`
`Through:
`
`From:
`
`Subject:
`
`Drug Name:
`
`Department of Health and Human Services
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology
`
`
`
`July 1, 2010
`
`Bob Rappaport, MD, Director
`Division of Anesthesia and Analgesia Products
`
`Denise Toyer, PharmD, Deputy Director
`Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA)
`
`Zachary Oleszczuk, PharmD, Acting Team Leader
`Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA)
`
`Proprietary Name Review
`Suboxone (Buprenorphine and Naloxone) Sublingual Film
`2 mg/0.5 mg and 8 mg/2 mg
`
`Application Type/Number: NDA 022410
`
`Applicant:
`
`OSE RCM #:
`
`Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`2010-1000
`
`
`*** This document contains proprietary and confidential information that should not be
`released to the public.***
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1 BACKGROUND
`
`1.1
`INTRODUCTION
`This re-assessment of the proprietary name responds to a notification that NDA 022410 may be approved
`within 90 days. The Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA) found the proposed
`proprietary name, Suboxone, acceptable in OSE Review #2009-165, dated July 8, 2009, OSE Review
`#2009-2342, dated February 18, 2010, and OSE Review #2010-492, dated April 20, 2010. The Division
`of Anesthesia and Analgesia Products did not have any concerns with the proposed name, Suboxone
`during the previous reviews, and the Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising and Communication
`(DDMAC) found the name acceptable from a promotional perspective on March 11, 2010.
`
`1.2 REGULATORY HISTORY
`, was found
`This is the third proprietary name submitted for this NDA. The first name
`unacceptable and this decision was communicated to the Applicant during a teleconference that was held
`on July 7 , 2009. DMEPA found the name
` unacceptable for this product because the word
`’ is incongruent with the final dosage form determined by ONDQA. This product does not meet the
`definition of a
` as defined by the CDER Data Standards Manual. DMEPA also provided comments
`on the container label and carton labeling on July 1, 2009.
`During the July 7, 2009, teleconference DMEPA informed the Applicant of our recommendation to
`manage this product and the currently marketed Suboxone sublingual tablets under the name ‘Suboxone’.
`The Applicant agreed to market both products under the same proprietary name, however the application
`was not approved during this review cycle and the Applicant received a complete response on
`August 8, 2009. Upon resubmission, the Applicant also submitted a request for a new proprietary name,
`Suboxone
`
`
`
`Thus, DMEPA found the proposed name
`unacceptable. However we maintained our recommendation from OSE Review #2009-165, that DMEPA
`believes that the both products could be managed under the same proprietary name 'Suboxone'.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 METHODS AND MATERIALS
`Since the proposed proprietary name “Suboxone” has already been evaluated for this product, DMEPA
`staff search a standard set of databases and information sources (see Section 5) to identify names with
`orthographic and/or phonetic similarity to the proposed name that have been approved since the
`completion of the previous OSE proprietary name review. We used the same search criteria outlined in
`OSE Review #2009-165, dated July 8, 2009, OSE Review #2009-2342, dated February 18, 2010, and
`OSE Review #2010-492, dated April 20, 2010, for the proposed proprietary name, Suboxone.
`Since the last review of the proposed proprietary name, none of Suboxone’s product characteristics have
`been altered. Thus, we did not re-evaluate previous names of concern. Additionally, DMEPA searches
`the USAN stem list to determine if the name contains any USAN stems as of the last USAN updates.
`DMEPA bases the overall risk assessment on the findings of a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
`(FMEA) of the proposed proprietary name, and focuses on the avoidance of medication errors.
`
`2
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`3 RESULTS
`The searches of the databases did not yield any new names that were thought to look or sound similar to
`Suboxone and represent a potential source of drug name confusion. Additionally, DMEPA staff did not
`identify any United States Adopted Names (USAN) stems in the proposed proprietary name, as of
`June 15, 2010.
`
`4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
`The Proprietary Name Risk Assessment findings indicate that the proposed name, Suboxone, is not
`vulnerable to name confusion that could lead to medication errors, nor is the name considered
`promotional. Thus, the Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA) has no
`objection to the proprietary name, Suboxone, for this product at this time.
`DMEPA considers this a final review; however, if approval of the NDA is delayed beyond 90 days from
`the date of this review, the Division of Anesthesia and Analgesia Products should notify DMEPA because
`the proprietary name must be re-reviewed prior to the new approval date. We are willing to meet with the
`Division for further discussion, if needed. If you have further questions or need clarifications, please
`contact Abolade Adelou, OSE project manager, at 301-796-4264.
`
`5 REFERENCES
`1. Oleszczuk, Z. OSE Review #2009-165: Proprietary Name Review for Suboxone
`2. Oleszczuk, Z. OSE Review #2009-2342: Proprietary Name Review for Suboxone
`February 18, 2010.
`3. Oleszczuk, Z. OSE Review #2008-1807: Label and Labeling Review for Suboxone
`July 1, 2009.
`
`. July 8, 2009.
`
`
`.
`
`Drugs@FDA (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm)
`4.
`Drugs@FDA contains most of the drug products approved since 1939. The majority of labels, approval
`letters, reviews, and other information are available for drug products approved from 1998 to the present.
`Drugs@FDA contains official information about FDA approved brand name, generic drugs, therapeutic
`biological products, prescription and over-the-counter human drugs and discontinued drugs and
`“Chemical Type 6” approvals.
`
`USAN Stems (http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/4782.html)
`5.
`USAN Stems List contains all the recognized USAN stems.
`
`Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis proprietary name requests
`6.
`This is a list of proposed and pending names that is generated by the Division of Medication Error
`Prevention and Analysis from the Access database/tracking system.
`
`
`
`3
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Application
`Type/Number
`--------------------
`NDA-22410
`
`Submission
`Type/Number
`--------------------
`ORIG-1
`
`Submitter Name
`
`Product Name
`
`--------------------
`RECKITT
`BENCKISER
`PHARMACEUTICA
`LS INC
`
`------------------------------------------
`SUBOXONE
`(BUPRENORPHINE/NALOXONE
`) sublingual film
`
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`ZACHARY A OLESZCZUK
`07/01/2010
`
`DENISE P TOYER
`07/01/2010
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket