throbber
Reviewer: Fred Alavi, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-350
`
`
`
`
`
`Key study findings:
`0
`Skin lesions were observed at all dose levels, ranging from relatively minimal and self-
`resolving at the low dose to severe and ulcerative requiring surgical amputation of the
`distal tail and moribund sacrifice at the mid and high doses.
`0 Lesion severity and time to lesion emergence was dose and time-dependent. For example,
`lesions erupted earlier with higher doses.
`0 There was no evidence of increased cyanide levels or immunoglobulin deposition in
`tissues at any dose, which appears to discount these mechanisms as causative of the
`lesions.
`
`0 Two females given the high dose became acutely moribund afier 1 or 2 doses, and were
`sacrificed.
`,
`‘
`.
`0 One high dose female became thrombocytopenic. This animal was re-challenged with
`drug after a dosing holiday and thrombocytopenia did not recur.
`- Two animals showed histologically confirmed renal glomerulopathy with associated
`clinical chemistry abnormalities in protein excretion and albumin.
`0 Exposure at lowest dose, 2 mg/kg was 4 to 6 x the clinical exposure at 5 mg, based on
`AUC.
`'
`4
`
`Study no.: DN05063
`Volume #, and page #: eNDA
`Conducting laboratory and location: BMS, One Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, NJ
`Date of study initiation: August 30, 2005
`GLP compliance: No
`QA report: yes ( ) no (x )
`Drug, lot #, and % purity: Batch 4K85994 with free base purity of 93.5%
`Methods .
`.
`'
`
`Intended as a one month dose-ranging study, observations of severe skin lesions altered the study
`design to investigate the nature of the drug-induced toxicities in monkeys. Doses and treatment
`duration are listed in the following table:
`
`.
`Daily Dose
`
`-
`
`.
`Concentration
`
`Number of
`Animals
`
`Dosing
`Duration
`
`Group
`Number
`Saxagliptin
`Volume
`Saxngliptin
`(EMS-477118)
`(mIJkg)
`(EMS-4771 18)
`Weeks
`
`(mg/kg)
`(mg/1111:)
`
`l
`
`2
`3
`
`o
`
`2
`10
`
`1
`
`1
`1
`
`0
`
`2
`10
`
`5M, 5F
`
`3M, 3F
`3M 3F
`
`4 13“
`
`13
`6
`
`;;(:./20b 1 30/20 5M, 5F4 4, 5a 130
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`were necropsied afier 13 weeks of dosing.
`b The high-dose was reduced from 30 mg/kg/day lo 20 mg/kg/day after 3 days of dosing in the males and 2
`days of dosing in the females.
`
`0 A subset of monkeys were necropsied at 4 and 6 weeks. Animal 4102 was necropsied at the end of 13
`weeks (see text for details).
`'
`
`130
`
`

`

`M4)
`
`
`
`Reviewer: Fred Alavi Ph.D. NDA No. 22-350
`
`Doses: 2, 10, 30/20 mg/kg (free base used in the study)
`Species/strain: cynomolgus monkeys from W
`Route, formulation, volume, and infusion rate: oral gavage
`Age: 23 to 38 months old
`Weight: 2.4 to 4.7 kg
`Sampling times:
`' PK data for saxagliptin and active metabolite were collected on Day 1, 28,
`» 84/85 at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 hrs post dose. Prior to freezing, an aliquot of plasma was
`taken for DPP4 inhibition evaluation. Plasma samples were analyzed at ‘4'
`.
`> J
`C
`3
`
`“(4)
`
`-
`
`Unique study design or methodology: Animals were acclimated for at least 21 days and had ad
`lib access to water. They received daily ration of approximately 12 biscuits each. Cyanide
`and thiocyanate levels were also measured during the first 2 TK time points on Day 1 and
`Day 28. Peripheral blood lymphocyte phenotying was also made in samples collected
`before and on week 2, 3, 4 and 8. The sponsor also investigated serum immunoglobulin
`(1g) levels, antinuclear antibody (ANA) levels and Ig reactivity to red blood cells and
`platelets. Attempts were made to look at skin and kidney samples using electron
`microscopy. Based on histopath findings, paraffin-embedded tail, nose, scrotum, foot,
`skin (face and torso), urinary bladder, kidney, tongue, lung, vagina, testes, skeletal muscle
`intestine (jejunum) were stained for IgG, IgM and IgA deposition by
`immunohistochemistry staining.
`
`Observations and times:
`
`Morta'ligg: daily
`Clinical signs:
`twice daily
`Body weights: weekly
`Food consumption: daily
`Ophthalmoscopy: before and at weeks 4 and 8
`M: before and at weeks 4 and 8
`
`'
`
`Hematology: Blood samples were collected from fasted monkeys twice prior to first dose and at
`week 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 13
`Clinical chemistg: The same as above
`Urinalysis: before and at week 4, 6 and 13
`Gross pathology: at the end of each phase (treatment and recovery).
`Organ weights: standard list with greater emphasis on the skin lesions to determine NOAEL.
`Histopathology: Adequate Battery: yes (x )
`Peer review:
`yes (x )
`
`Results
`
`Mortality and clinical signs:
`
`2mg/kg13 month dosing duration)
`Five of the six monkeys developed skin ‘abrasions/ulcerations’ on the tail and-digits during the
`dosing period. Lesions developed within 13 days of dosing. The lesions largely resolved despite
`continued dosing, with only one female harboring minimal lesions at the end of 3 months of
`treatment.
`
`131
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Fred AlaviI Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-350
`
`10mg/kg (6 weeks dosing duration)
`Four of six monkeys developed abrasions/ulcerations on the tail, digits, and scrotum within 13
`days of dosing. While some lesions resolved, there remained ulcerative, inflamed lesions of the
`tail and multifocal scabs of the skin/subcutis in some animals at the end of 6 weeks treatment.
`
`30/20m
`ose reduction at da 2/3 then 4 & 6 weeks at 20m /k
`Two females (#8 4202 & 4205) were sacrificed afier the first or secOnd dose afier becoming
`acutely moribund (ataxia, collapse). Skin lesions were not observed in these two acutely ill
`females. The dose was reduced in remaining animals to 20mg/kg for an additional 4 or 6 weeks
`duration.
`
`Severe ulcerative lesions were identified in 7 of 8 monkeys as early as day 6. Surgical amputation
`of the tail was required in one male and female; the female was found dead the following
`morning. An additional male was sacrificed moribund on day 39. Edema was feature of the skin
`lesions.
`
`Body weights: No drug-related change in BW
`Food consumption: No drug-related change in food intake
`Ophthalmoscopy: No drug-related change
`
`EKG and arterial oxygenation:
`There was no drug-related change in cardiovascular parameters. One monkey had inverted QRS
`before treatment and at week 4. This appeared to be a pre-existing condition and not a drug-
`related finding.
`
`Hematology: The decrease in RBC parameters may have been due to some form of hemorrhage
`from vascular damage and skin lesions due to the fact that reticulocyte levels were increased and
`albumin levels were increased.
`Increase in WBC parameters and albumin to globulin ratio is
`consistent with inflammation and inflammatory cell infiltration in the damaged tissue identified
`microscopically.
`'
`
`Hematological changes relative to pre-dose levels at 2 mg/kg
`0 Decrease in RBC, Hgb, HC, decrease in platelets
`increase in neutrophils
`o Compensatory 2.4x increase in reticulocyte on Days 35 to 56,
`0 Presence of reactive lymphocytes (typical of lymphoid activation) on Day 35; and,
`
`Hematological changes at 10 mg/kg
`0 Decreased in RBC, Hgb, HCt and decrease in platelet count
`0
`Increase in reticulocytes and WBC (predominantly due to increased neutrophil count)
`and monocytes (1.8 to 2.9x) and increase in lymphocytes (1.4x),
`
`Hematological changes at 30/20 mg/kg,
`0 Decrease in RBC, hemoglobin, Hot and decreased in platelet
`-
`Increase in reticulocyte, Neutrophils, monocytes
`0 Presence of reactive lymphocytes
`O
`Additionally I (4102) developed severe thrombocytopenia (-77 to -94%) at 2weeks
`leading to temporary halt in treatment until platelet counts recovered. This animal was re—
`challenged with drug without recurrence of the thrombocytopenia.
`
`132
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Fred Alavi Ph.D. NDA No. 22-350
`
`Hematolo ' ical chan - e in c nomol . us monke 5 relative to retest values
`m
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1-5 to 2-5x
`
`
`
`
`
`Clinical chemistry:
`0 There were decreases in albumin and albumin/globulin ratio and increases in globulin,
`total protein and fibrinogen at saxagliptin doses 2 2 mg/kg
`=
`In contrast to other MD and HD animals, a MD female monkeys (#3203) and a HD male
`monkey (#4103) with kidney lesions (glomerulopathy) had decreased levels of total
`protein and albumin
`
`0
`
`
`m
`
`
`
`
`
`--—-—
`-———
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cyanide levels:
`There were no detectable levels of cyanide in the whole blood of any monkey. Serum thiocyanate
`were detected only in the HD monkeys (1.1 to 2.7 ug/mL) but were within the background levels
`noted in humans (nonsmokers: 2.9 and smokers 7.1 ug/mL). The skin lesions were therefore not
`related to liberation of cyanide from saxagliptin.
`
`Peripheral—Blood Lymphocfle Phenotyping and Immunology Assessment:
`0 There were no drug-related changes in lymphocyte subsets.
`0 Total IgG and IgM levels in drug-treated monkeys were significantly increased compared
`to individual pre-study levels and controls
`0 There were no detectable antinuclear antibodies (ANAs).
`0 Overall findings do not support a significant immune-mediated mechanism for skin
`lesions in monkeys.
`
`133
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Fred Alavi, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-350
`
`saxagliptin: One—Month Oral Toxicity Study in Monkeys
`Summary of Absolute Number of Lymphocytes (10e‘3 lpL)
`for Male Monkeys at Prestudy
`
`N Mean (SD)
`5
`3.66 (1.45)
`3
`3.52 (0.73)
`3
`2.38 (0.72)
`5
`3.78 (1.38)
`
`Group
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS-477118
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`EMS—477118 30/20 mg/kg
`
`Parameter
`CD2+CD20-
`
`CD20+002—
`
`CD4+CD8-
`
`cna+cn4—
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS-477118 10 mg/kg
`EMS—477118 30/20 mg/kg
`
`5
`3
`3
`5
`
`0.63 (0.45)
`0.61 (0.17)
`0.68 (0.25)
`0.67 (0.26)
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS-477118
`EMS-477118 10 mg/kg
`BMS~477118 30/20 mg/kg
`
`1.80 (0.55)
`5
`1.43 (0.27)
`3
`3 1.08 (0.33)
`5 1.67 (0.67)
`
`2.43 (1.19)
`5
`Control
`2.59 (0.39)
`3
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`1.65 (0.30)
`3
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`2.67 (0.66)
`5
`EMS-477118 30/20 mg/kg
`Female Monkeys at Prestudy
`
`Saxagliptin: one—Month Oral Toxicity Study in Monkeys
`Summary of Absolute Number of Lymphocytes (10e"3 /)1L)
`for Male Monkeys at Day 22
`
`Parameter
`CD2+CD20-
`
`CDZO+CD2—
`
`CD4+CD8—
`
`cos+cn4-
`
`Group
`Control
`2 mg/kg-
`EMS—477118
`EMS-477118 10 mg/kg
`EMS-477118 30/20 mg/kg
`
`N Mean (SD)
`5
`3.47 (0.87)
`3
`2.83 (0.63)
`3 2.80 (1.04)
`5
`2 89 (1.54)
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS-477118 10 mg/kg
`EMS—477118 30/20 mg/kg
`
`5
`3
`3
`5
`
`0.70 (0.23)
`0.54 (0.24)
`0.91 (0.13)
`0.74 (0.20)
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS—47711310 mg/kg
`EMS—477118 30/20 mg/kg
`
`1.74 (0.39)
`5
`1.14 (0.11)
`3
`1.19 (0.40)
`3
`5 1.41 (0.73)
`
`5
`Control
`3
`2 mg/kg
`EMS-477118
`3
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`5
`EMS—477118 30/20 mg/kg
`Female Monkeys at Day 21
`
`2 22 (0.56)
`1.97 (0.70)
`1.86 (0.56)
`1 83 (0.80)
`
`Parameter
`
`Group
`
`N Mean (SD)
`
`Parameter
`
`Group
`
`N Mean (SD)
`
`CD2+CD20—
`
`CD20+CD2-
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS-477118 10 mg/kg
`EMS-477118 30/20 mg/kg
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS—477118 10 lug/kg
`EMS-477118 30/20 mg/kg
`
`5
`3
`3
`5
`
`5
`3
`3
`5
`
`2.89 (0.88)
`3.49 (0.56)
`2.45 (0.75)
`1.92 (0.57)
`
`0.65 (0.25)
`0.62 (0.14)
`0.57 (0.28)
`0.53 (0.14)
`
`CD2+CD20—
`
`CD20+CD2-
`
`CD4+CD8—
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS-477118 10 mg/kg
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS-477118
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`
`3.89 (0.93)
`5
`3.40 (0.99)
`3
`3 06 (0.66)
`3
`5 0.76 (0.27)
`3
`0.60 (0.23)
`3
`0.51 (0.40)
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS-477118
`EMS-477118 10 mg/kg
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS-477118 10 mg/kg
`
`5 2.01 (0.74)
`3
`1.51 (0.17)
`3
`1.79 (0.48)
`
`5 2.01 (0.25)
`3
`2.17 (0.35)
`3 1.52 (0.05)
`
`CD4+CDB—
`
`CD8+CD4—
`
`‘
`
`CD8+CD4—
`
`1.52 (0.63)
`5
`Control
`1.65 (0.31)
`3
`2 mg/kg
`EMS-477118
`1.27 (0.58)
`3
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`0.89 (0.32)
`5
`EMS—477118 30/20 mg/kg
`1.59 (0.28)
`5
`Control.
`No significant differences from the vehicle control
`2.19 (0.77)
`3
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`group were observed, based on the Dunnett
`1.67 (0.50)
`3
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`
`
`
`1-36 (0.26)5EMS—477118 30/20 mg/kg multiple—comparison t—test procedure (1:20.05) .W
`
`134
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Fred Alavi, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-350
`
`0nc~ to Three-Month Oral Toxicity Study In Monkeys
`Amrhmem 3:
`lndlvldual And-Nuclear Antibody (ANA) Reactivity
`
`
`
`1
`EMS-477118
`(Urns/ks)
`
`ZKZEZZZZ
`
`sum Day
`Dayn
`Dny34
`
`Ratio'ANA” Ralio'ANA"
`
`
`1101
`0.24
`-
`0.26
`-
`
`1102
`0.25
`—
`0.29
`.
`
`1103
`0.29
`-
`0.25
`-
`
`-
`
`
`210l
`2
`025
`-
`.
`0.38
`-
`
`EMS-477113
`2102
`0.33
`—
`0.48
`-
`
`(2 mE’kS)
`
`
`
`.
`3
`
`
`BMS~477118
`3l02
`0.24
`-
`0.64
`
`(10 Ina/ks)
`
`-
`
`4101
`
`0.22
`4
`4102‘
`NA
`NA
`
`0.30
`EMS-477118
`4103
`NA
`NA
`
`NA
`NA
`(30/20 tug/kg)
`4104
`4105
`
`
`EZEZZ
`
`' Calwlated as the mean sample 0D divided by the refinance control OD
`" Reactivity considered:
`negative (~) ifratio is less than 0.7
`positive (+) iflatiu is gram than orequal to 1.0
`borderline (+l-)ifmlio is greater than or equal to 0.7 and loss than 1.0
`
`‘ Evaluated serum sample collected on Day 42.
`NA - Not available.
`
`Immunohistochemistry:
`,
`0 Except for presence of IgG and IgM, in the glomerulus or tubular epithelium of 2
`monkeys (1 MD, lHD) with glomerulopathy, there was no immunoglobulin deposition in
`any of the other tissues evaluated.
`Similar to immunoassessment data, the absence of immunoglobulin deposition suggests
`that skin lesions were unlikely to be an autoimmune or complement-mediated mechanism.
`
`0
`
`135
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA No. 22-350
`Reviewer: Fred Alavi Ph.D.
`
`Individual immunoglobulin levels in male and female monkeys:
`One— to Three-Month Oral Toxicity Study in Monkeys
`Attachment 4512 Indlvldnnl Serum Immunoglobnlin Levels in Male: (mg/41L)
`
`
`
`Stu Day
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`BMs4771 18
`
`(0 mglke)
`
`
`
`
`
`1232
`230
`1148
`225
`65
`
`
`
`Sthev
`103
`41
`41
`41
`4
`
`
`
`2101
`
`
`2102 V
`
`2103
`Mean 1
`1229
`
`111
`
`
`3101
`
`
`
`3102 Q/
`1256
`167
`
`1103
`
`2
`HMS—477118
`gsz/kg)
`
`3
`EMS-477118
`
`
`
`
`
`
`62
`2
`
`2'20“
`36
`
`"1082
`59
`
`
`
`242
`39
`
`226
`11
`
`72
`41
`
`1359
`115
`
`258
`48
`
`83
`51
`
`1554
`302
`
`268
`70
`
`W
`
`87
`64
`
`,,
`
`1461
`210
`
`262
`68
`
`1522
`130
`
`248
`42
`
`67
`7
`
`
`
`97*
`16
`
`
`
`1888‘
`500
`
`253
`70
`
`71
`4
`
`'1§54*
`425
`
`244
`55
`
`D
`'
`
`*****
`
`"
`
`111‘“
`
`,190"
`
`76
`
`.1
`72
`6
`
`l
`.J54
`21
`
`4
`4102'
`
`EMS-477118
`4103
`(3020111348)
`4104
`4105
`Mean
`Sthev
`
`1219
`138
`
`249
`61
`
`71
`26
`
`1513
`83
`
`303
`83
`
`92*
`29
`
`1968‘
`542
`
`286
`73
`
`64
`21
`
`V W
`1789‘
`718
`
`'271’
`75
`
`
`
`
`Bold value: indicates that the Day mean was significantly different from the Preatudy mean (p<0.05)2 Arithmetic means are presented.
`‘ Indicates significant difference from vehicle control (p<0.05). Comparisons were based on least squares adjusted mean Erom ANOCOV model.
`' Evaluated using serum collected on Day 42.
`NA = Not applicable.
`
`One- to Three-Month Oral Toxlclty Study In Monkeys
`Attachment 4111 Individual Serum Immunoglobulin Levels in Female: (mg/11L)
`
`Grou -
`
`LG
`
`1
`
`LG
`
`Study Day
`
`1_M
`
`Day 34
`1;‘
`
`1G
`
`I
`EMS-4771 18
`(0 mg/kg)
`
`2
`BMSA77118
`2 m ;
`;
`
`3
`EMS-4771 18
`10 m :
`'.
`
`4
`EMS-4771 1 8
`(3OIZO mg/kg)
`
`Animal No.
`1201
`1202
`1203
`1204
`1205
`Mean
`Sthev
`
`2201
`2202
`2203
`Mean
`Sthev
`
`3201
`3202
`3203
`Mean
`Sthev
`
`4201
`4202
`4203
`4204
`4205
`Mean
`Sthev
`
`Prestudy
`I-A
`
`Day 13
`1A
`
`Day 42
`1; A
`
`1;G
`
`I
`
`1498
`17s
`
`240
`75
`
`100
`7
`
`1293
`113
`
`216
`75
`
`1245
`153
`
`177
`20
`
`92
`31
`
`1346*
`77
`
`190
`22
`
`87
`8
`
`95
`22
`
`1267
`119
`
`1356*
`112
`
`1600*
`432
`
`206
`58
`
`140*
`35
`
`1826*
`539
`
`1475
`325
`
`235
`84
`
`"107
`24
`
`
`
`1 -
`
`»_
`
`-
`
`
`
`1264
`157
`
`261 ’
`84
`
`l
`
`314*
`73
`
`1 86
`23
`
`83
`13
`
`2
`
`044*
`700
`
`201
`12
`
`111*
`8
`
`263
`88
`
`191
`16
`
`187
`3
`
`95
`9
`
`90
`9
`
`107
`18
`
`
`
`“T297
`204
`
`266 .___ 93
`80
`25
`
`1562*
`157
`
`213
`25
`
`111*
`9
`
`NA
`NA
`
`NA
`NA
`
`NA
`NA
`
`NA
`NA
`
`3.1
`NA
`NA
`
`NA
`NA
`
`136
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Fred Alavi, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-350
`
`Saxagliptin: One-Month Oral Toxicity Study in Monkeys
`Summary of Absolute Number of Lymphocytes (10e‘3 /uL)
`for Male Monkeys at Prestudy
`
`Saxagliptin: One—Month oral Toxicity Study in Monkeys
`Summary of Absolute Number of Lymphocytes
`(10e‘3 /pL)
`for Male Monkeys at Day 22
`
`Parameter
`CD2+CD20-
`
`CD20+CD2~
`
`CD4+CD8—
`
`CDB+CD4~
`
`Group
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`EMS—477118 30/20 mg/kg
`
`N Mean (SD)
`5 3.66 (1.45)
`3
`3.52 (0.73)
`3
`2.38 (0.72)
`5
`3.78 (1.38)
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS—477110 10 mg/kg
`EMS—477118 30/20 lug/kg
`
`5 0.63 (0.45)
`3
`0.61 (0.17)
`3
`0.68 (0.25)
`5
`0.67 (0.26)
`
`1.80 (0.55)
`5
`Control
`1.43 (0.27)
`3
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`1.08 (0.33)
`3
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`1.67 (0.67)
`5
`EMS—477118 30/20 lug/kg
`2.43 (1.19)
`5
`Control
`2.58 (0.39)
`3
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`1.65 (0.30)
`3
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`2.67 (0.66)
`5
`EMS—477118 30/20 tug/kg
`Female Monkeys at Prestudy
`
`Parameter
`CD2+CD20—
`
`CD20+CD2—
`'
`
`CD4+CDB-
`
`CD8+CD4—
`
`Group
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS—477118 10 lug/kg
`EMS-477118 30/20 mg/kg
`
`N Mean (SD)
`5
`3.47 (0.87)
`3
`2.83 (0.63)
`3
`2.80 (1 04)
`5
`2 89 (1.54)
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS-477118 10 Eng/kg
`EMS—477118 30/20 mg/kg
`
`5
`3
`3
`5
`
`5
`Control
`3
`2 mg/kg
`EMS-477113
`3
`EMS-477118 10 mg/kg
`5
`EMS-477118 30/20 mg/kg
`5
`Control
`3
`2 rug/kg
`EMS-477113
`3
`EMS-477118 10 mg/kg
`5
`EMS—477118 30/20 rug/kg
`Female Monkeys at Day 21
`
`0.70 (0.23)
`0.54 (0.24)
`0.91 (0.13)
`0.74 (0.20)
`
`1.74 (0.39)
`1.14 (0.11)
`1.19 (0.40)
`1.41 (0.73)
`2.22 (0.56)
`1.97 (0.70)
`1 86 (0.56)
`1.83 (0.80)
`
`Parameter
`
`Group
`
`N Mean (SD)
`
`Parameter
`
`Group
`
`N Mean (SD)
`
`CD2+CD20—
`
`CD20+CD2—
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`EMS—477118 30/20 rug/kg
`
`5 2.89 (0.88)
`3 3.49 (0.56)
`3 2.45 (0.75)
`5
`1.92 (0 57)
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS-477118 10 mg/kg
`EMS-477118 30/20 lug/kg
`
`5 0.65 (0.25)
`3
`0.62 (0.14)
`3
`0.57 (0.28)
`5
`0.53 (0.14)
`
`CD2+CD20-
`
`CDZO+CD2—
`
`C04+CD8—
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`Bus—477118 10 mg/kg
`Control
`2 rug/kg
`EMS-477118
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`
`5
`3
`3
`5
`3
`3
`
`3-89 10-93)
`3.40 (0.99)
`3.06 (0.66)
`0.76 (0 27)
`0.60 (0 23)
`0.51 (0 4D)
`
`Control
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`EMS-477118 10 rug/kg
`
`5
`3
`3
`
`2.01 (0 74)
`1.51 (0 l7)
`1.79 (0 48)
`
`CD4+CD8—
`
`-
`
`CD8+CD4—
`
`CD8+CD4—
`
`1.52 (0.63)
`5
`Control
`1.65 (0.31)
`3
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477113
`5 2.01 (0.25)
`Control
`1.27 (0.58)
`3
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`3
`2.17 (0.85)
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`0.89 (0.32)
`5
`EMS—477118 30/20 mg/kg
`3
`1.52 (0.05)
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`'
`1.59 (0.28)
`5
`Control
`No significant differences from the vehicle control
`2.19 (0.77)
`3
`2 mg/kg
`EMS—477118
`group were observed, based on the Dunnett
`1.67 (0.50)
`3
`EMS—477118 10 mg/kg
`
`
`
`1.36 (0.26)5EMS—477118 30/20 rug/kg multiple—comparison t—test procedure (1320.05) .
`
`Platelet Reactive immunoglobulin
`
`0.400
`
`- 0.350
`
`
`
`
`0.300 ~
`0.2.50
`
`0.200 ~
`
`0.150 ~
`
`
`35
`
`3'0
`
`25
`- 20
`
`15
`
`1°
`5
`
`0100
`0.050
`
`0.000
`
`—
`1101 1102 1103- 1104 1105 1201 12:02 1203 1204 1205 4101 4-102 4103 4104 4105 4201 4203
`
`* 0
`
`.
`-0D ‘71? meeme +MPV
`
`Evaluation of Platelet—Associated Ig at Day 29/30
`at Day 2913.0.
`Observed increases
`in PA—lg correlates with increased mean platelet volume
`Thromboc'ytopenic monkey, 41.02 (denoted with a star), had the greatest amount of PA—Ig, PA—Ig is
`expxessed as optical density Values on 1e 11 ‘y‘ axis; mean platelet volume indices are on Hie right ‘y’ axis.
`
`137
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Fred Alavi Ph.D. NDA No. 22-350 '
`
`
`
`Urinalysis: Only notable change was an increase in urinary protein in 1 MD female (1083 mg/dl)
`and 1 HD male (128 mg/dl) with glomerulopathy.
`
`Organ weights:
`A drug-related increase in spleen weight was noted at 2 mg/kg (21 to 83%), 10 mg/kg
`(107% due to 1 female at week 4) and 30/20 mg/kg (25 to 31%). The significance of
`slightly higher kidney weight in the HD females is uncertain. The increase in spleen
`weight was correlated to lymphoid hyperplasia
`
`Gross pathology:
`There were no macroscopic drug related finding at 2 mg/kg
`Macroscopic findings at 10 mg/kg (MD) included tail skin, focal or multifocal erosion and
`scabs on distal part ofthe tail, scrotal skin (focal erosion), skin erosion of the face
`(multifocal erosion), in the nose (multifocal erosion). These lesions were not seen in all
`MD animals but rather I or more and occasionally the same animal with more sites. The
`female monkey with glomerulopathy has subcutaneous edema (ascites) and hydrothorax
`secondary to urinary protein loss.
`Macroscopic findings1n the HD animals were similar to MD animals except that tail
`lesion appeared necrotic in at least to males
`One HD male (4103, sacrificed on Day 39) had scrotal edema that was associated with
`ulceration/inflammation determined microscopically.
`
`Histopathology:
`In general histopathology findings noted at 2 mg/kg occurred in more animals at higher doses
`with increased severity and occasionally recruited new target organs
`
`2 mg/kg
`Minimal to mild subacute to chronic inflammation and or mononuclear cell infiltration in
`the glandular organs (pituitary, parathyroid, mandibular, mammary, reproductive organs
`including testes, epididymides, seminal vesicles, prostate) and brain (choroid plexus),
`peripheral nerve (sciatic), liver, kidney and urinary bladder
`Minimal subacute vasculitis1n the skeletal muscle, minimal to slight lmphoid
`hyperplasia1n the spleen and bone marrow.
`
`10 mg/kg,
`Minimal to moderate subacute, chronic, and/or chronic-active inflammation and/or
`mononuclear-cell infiltration in glandular organs [pituitary, parathyroid, mandibular
`salivary gland, pancreas and mammary gland, skin (abdominal, dorsal, tail, and/or
`scrotum, nose), reproductive organs, including testes, epididymides, seminal vesicles,
`prostate, vagina, and uterus], brain (choroid plexus only), peripheral nerve (sciatic nerve),
`liver (3 of 3 females), kidneys, esophagus, tongue and urinary bladder
`Minimal to moderate subacute vasculitis1n the glandular organs (thyroid gland), skin
`(dorsal, face, and nose), skeletal muscle, diaphragm, urinary bladder, lung and intestine, I
`vagina and cervix.
`
`138
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Fred Alavi, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22—350
`
`There was also slight to marked interface inflammation and/or mononuclear-cell
`infiltration in the skin (abdominal, dorsal, tail, and face), vagina, and tongue, urinary
`bladder,
`
`Minimal to moderate ulceration and/or erosion in the skin, including tail, nose, face, and
`scrotum correlating with erosions, scabs, and/or the misshapen nostril (due to a healed
`ulcer)
`Minimal to mild lymphoid hyperplasiain the spleen and bone marrow
`Mild multifocal glomerulopathy of the kidneys with secondary pulmonary artery thrombus
`formation, subcutaneous and organ edema, ascites, and hydrothorax due to urinary protein
`loss in lfemale.
`
`30/20 mg/kg
`Minimal to moderate subacute, chronic, and/or chronic-active inflammation and/or
`mononuclear-cell infiltrations in the glandular organs [pituitary, parathyroid gland; skin
`(tail, scrotum, and/or foot), testes, epididymides, and prostate; liver, kidneys, and urinary
`bladder
`
`Minimal to mild subacute vasculitis in the skin, including tail, foot; lung, testes and with
`fibrinoid necrosis of pulmonary arteries and foot microvasculature
`Moderate interface inflammation in the skin, including tail and/or scrotum
`Mild to marked ulceration with or without hemorrhage in the skin, tail, foot and scrotum
`Moderate to marked coagulative necrosis in the tail correlating with the hard and/or dark
`distal tails observed clinically (including 2 amputated tails)
`Minimal to slight lymphoid hyperplasia in the spleen
`Slight multifocal glomerulopathy of the kidneys with secondary thrombus formation of
`pulmonary arteries and small vessels in small intestine (jejunum) and foot due to Urinary
`protein loss in 1 male
`
`139
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Fred Alavi Ph.D. NDA No. 22-350
`
`A summary of drug—related microscopic findings are presented in the table below.
`
`Summary of Drug-related Microscopic Lesions in Affected Organ Systems
`
`
`
`
`30/20 mg/kg/day (HD)
`2 mg/kg/day (LD)
`10 mg/kg/day (MD)
`
`D16 (1F); D39 (1M)
`Dosing Duration
`13 wks (3M 3F)
`D29 (1F)
`
`
`
`6 wks (3M, 2F)
`4 wks (2F, 2M)
`
`
`6 wks (1M); 13 wks (1M)
`
`(acute deaths excluded)
`
` _——_-I-__
`
`
`Inflammation and/or Mononuclear—cel] infiltrates
`
`
`
`+Severity: LD= minimal; MD=minimal to moderate; HD minimal to moderate
`Ulcers and/or Emsions
`
`Total __—-n-
`Skin“
`MSeven'ty: MD= slight to moderate; HD = mild to marked
`
`
`
`
`
`
`——-——_—
`“Severity: LD= minimal to slight; MD=slight to mild; HD =minimal to slight
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`————_——
`
`
`
`———_——-—
`
`
`
`
`
`- indicates absence of finding in group
`Wm: pituitary gland, parathyroid gland, thyroid gland, salivary gland, pancreas, and/or mammary gland
`
`Skin: routine (dorsal), tail, nose, distal appendages (hand/foot), scrotum, and/or face
`
`Reproductive Organs: testes, epididymides, seminal vesicles, prostate, vagina, and/or uterus
`
`Solid Organs: liver, kidneys, brain (choroid plexus), peripheral nerve (sciatic, cauda equina), urinary bladder, tongue,
`
`skeletal muscle, diaphragm, lung, intestine, and/or esophagus
`
`140
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer' Fred Alavi Ph D. NDA N 22-350
`
`Detailed Histopathology findings in monkeys at interim 4 week and 6 week and at the end of the
`study termination in monkeys treated with 0, 2, 10 and 30/20 mg/kg of saxagliptin (groups 1, 2, 3
`and 4, respectively).
`
`NUMBER OF ANIMALS wz-m MICROSCOPIC FINDINGS BY ORGAN/GROUP/SEX
`Necropsy status: Interim/Schemled Necropsy (K1), Except Deaths
`4 flee): Interim Necropsy
`
`NUMBER or Alumna WITH MICROSCOPIC FINDINGS BY ORGAN/GROUP/SBX
`Nscrnpsy Status: Interim/Scheduled Necropsy (KI), Except Deaths
`4 “sex Interim Necropsy
`
`
`
`m,
`3
`-
`-
`-
`—
`-
`-
`—
`-
`-
`-
`-
`—
`-
`-
`-
`-
`_
`-
`-
`-
`—
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`_
`_
`-
`..
`-
`_
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`—
`—
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`_
`_
`-
`-
`-
`~
`—
`-
`—
`
`I
`2
`2
`-
`I
`1
`-
`—
`1
`1
`-
`-
`-
`-
`2
`2
`2
`1
`-
`-
`—
`-
`I
`1
`2
`2
`-
`-
`-
`-
`_
`_
`_
`-
`_
`-
`-
`2
`1
`-
`-
`1
`1
`2
`2
`-
`-
`2
`2
`-
`—
`—
`—
`-
`-
`2
`1
`I
`I
`-
`2
`1
`1
`i
`-
`-
`—
`-
`—
`
`
`
`
`I
`2
`2
`I
`—
`-
`—
`-
`1
`1
`-
`—
`-
`-
`2
`2
`2
`_
`-
`-
`-
`-
`2
`2
`2
`-
`—
`-
`i
`1
`_
`_
`-
`-
`1
`l
`-
`2
`I
`-
`-
`l
`1
`2
`1
`1
`l
`2
`1
`-
`—
`—
`—
`I
`1
`2
`-
`Z
`1
`l
`2
`1
`-
`t
`l
`1
`_
`-
`_
`
`was
`3
`1
`l
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`1
`l
`1
`1
`i
`l
`1
`-
`1
`1
`I
`1
`1
`l
`1
`-
`-
`-
`-
`_
`1
`1
`1
`1
`_
`-
`-
`1
`—
`—
`-
`1
`1
`1
`l
`—
`-—
`I
`-
`-
`—
`1
`I
`-
`—
`1
`l
`-
`—
`—
`1
`1
`_
`-
`_
`l
`—
`1
`1
`1
`
`.
`
`4
`2
`2
`2
`-
`-‘
`-
`'
`‘
`"
`-
`-
`'
`’
`2
`2
`2
`2
`-
`-
`-
`—
`-
`-
`2
`1
`-
`-
`'
`_
`_
`..
`_
`-
`1
`-
`1
`2
`"
`1
`1
`1
`]
`2
`1
`1
`i
`2
`1
`x
`1
`
`-
`1
`1
`2
`-
`2
`2
`'
`2
`1
`1
`-
`1
`'
`-
`_
`-
`_
`
`I
`2
`2
`-
`-
`-
`2
`2
`2
`2
`-
`-
`-
`—
`2
`2
`2
`_
`-
`—
`-
`—
`2
`2
`2
`1
`1
`1
`-
`_
`_
`.
`..
`-
`1
`1
`-
`2
`1
`—
`~
`1
`1
`2
`2
`-
`-
`2
`2
`-
`—
`-
`-
`-
`—
`2
`l
`I
`-
`1
`f
`-
`i
`i
`1
`—
`—
`-
`
`_ m
`Dose Group
`Nu. Animals per Dose Group
`KIDNEYS
`Nd. Examined
`NM)
`- Mineralization
`Grade 1
`- Giant can: muitlnucieated
`Grade 1
`- Infiltration: nononucieir Cell
`Grade 1
`
`BONE, RIB
`
`Dose Group
`No. Animals per base Group
`Imam HANDS
`No. Examined

`"AD
`ADRTA
`No. qunined
`NRD
`BONE MARROW, RIB
`No. Examined
`NAB
`BONE MARROW; 5WD. Examined
`NAD
`No. Exsminrd
`NM)
`BONE, 51mm
`No. Examinsd
`
`NAD
`Na. Examined
`BRAIN
`NA!)
`- Infiltration: nononuciear cell
`Grade I
`Na. Examinad
`menu
`NM?
`- Giant c211: mutinuciented
`Grade 1
`
`
`
`- Inflammation: subacute
`
`CERVYX
`
`EYES
`
`Grads 1
`"no minim!
`NAD
`Nc- Examined
`C010"
`"AD
`' Inflammation: “55'5““
`Grade 2
`- Giant coll: multlnuclaatad
`Grade 1
`No. Exanunmo
`DIAPHRAGM
`"AD
`- Infiltration: nononuciesr cell
`Grade 1
`1110mm
`No. Examined
`"AD
`EPIDIDYMIDBS
`No. Examined
`"An
`— Infiltration: mononuclesr c211
`Grade 1
`tsomcus
`No. examined
`MD
`— Infiltration: nononuclear col)
`Grade 1
`No. mullinfld
`W
`- Infiltratinn: nonolluciedr cell
`Grade 1
`summon
`No. Examined
`"*9
`HEART
`No. Examined
`““3
`- Infiltration: mononuclear cell
`on“? 1
`11mm
`No. Examined
`"AD
`“m “mag:
`nan - Noan abnormal discovered
`temsles: Ssxagliptln (o lug/kg)
`Group
`1, fitntrai. males: Suxuqliptirfinw Isa/k9);
`Group
`3,
`o nose, males: Saxaglipt
`(1
`nag/kg): Imues: saxaguptin uu lug/kg)
`Group
`4, High Dose, males: Saxagllptin (20 rug/kg); funnies: Saxagliptin (20 lag/kg)
`
`2
`2
`
`2
`1
`1
`1
`
`1
`1
`
`2
`1
`1
`1
`2
`1
`1
`1
`
`1
`1
`
`
`
`- Inflammation: subacute
`
`- Clmruiopathy
`MCRIMAL GLANDS
`
`LIVER
`
`Grade 2
`Grade 3
`No. Examined
`HAD
`No. Examined
`Mp
`- Leukocytnsis: sinusoid!
`Grade I
`
`- Innmmation: subacuta
`
`Grade 2
`- Infiltratiun: mononuciaar can
`Grade 1
`No. Examined
`NM)
`- Histiocytnsis: alvroinr space
`Grads 1
`- Infiltration: monanucloar can
`Grade 1
`_ Inlisnmtion: subacutr
`
`nuns
`
`Grade g
`Grade 4
`
`_ “nub“: "acute
`_ Inflammation: chronic
`
`Grade I
`Grade 3
`mounnmzrs mamas. Examined
`NAD
`
`— Histincytes
`Grade 2
`- Infiltration: monenuclur call
`Grams 1
`my mun
`No. Examined
`NAD
`- Infiltration: mononucisar cell
`Grade I
`MANDXB. 1mm mm: No. Examined
`NAD
`- are blood sens: sinuses
`6““ Z
`Grade I
`
`- Inflammation: acute
`
`- Histlozytosls: sinus
`6““ 2
`mummsnmwuw GLNDNo. Examined
`NAD
`- Infiltration: mononuclear cell.
`Grade 1
`Grade 2
`.
`am.
`:1
`M E" 3,,
`Ln
`Grade 4
`Brad: 2
`r us
`No. Ruined
`HAD
`
`:
`
`_
`
`Histiocytosis
`NOSE
`
`Hrsm. LYMPH NOD:
`
`Grade 2
`
`141
`
`- Inflammation: vascular
`- Erosion
`MAD - Nothing abnormal discovered
`females: Smgliptin m rug/kg)
`Group
`1, Control, males: Ssxagliptin (0 lug/kg):
`Group 3, Mid Dose, muss: Saxagllptin ()0 mg/kg); remiss: saxagupun no lug/kg)
`Group
`4, High nose, miles: Ssxaqliptin (20 mg/kg);
`remains: Saxagnptin (20 lug/kg)
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Fred Alavi Ph.D.
`NDA No. 22-350
`
`W OF ANIHAU HI'A'H MICROSCOPIC FINDINGS BY ORGAN/GROUP/SEX
`Necropsy Status:
`Interim/Scheduled Necropsy (K1). Except Deaths
`4 Meek Interim Necropny
`
`Dose Group
`No. Animus per Dose Group
`
`1
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Il
`
`1
`1
`1
`1
`
`_
`2
`i
`
`2
`2
`2
`2
`-
`-
`2
`-
`1
`l
`-
`-
`1
`i
`2
`2
`2
`I
`1
`l
`
`THIRD“) GLAND
`
`- Depletion: colloid
`
`" Erosion
`
`289
`
`
`
`- "netball
`
`Grade 5
`
`- Inflamnatian: vascular
`Grade 1
`Grade 2
`
`‘ lluwullnge
`Grade 4
`- Inflammation: chronic-activeGrade A
`- Granule»: foreign bodyGrade 2
`— ulcer
`Grade 1
`Grade 3
`Grads 4
`Grade 5
`— Necrosis: coagulntiva Grade 4
` MAD - Nothing abnormal. discovered
`females: quliptin (D m Ikg)
`Group 1, Control, males! Saanliptin (o lug/k9)!
`Group
`3, Mid Dose, nuey: Saxagiiptin (10 rag/kg); females: Smugliptln u Ila/kg)
`Group
`4. High Doze, maies: Saxagiiptin (20 lug/kg):
`females: Suagilptin (20 Lug/kg)
`
`142
`
`
`
` I'll.b””HIII
`
`
`
`
`Human OF ANIMAL? WITH MICROSCOPIC FINDIM‘vS BY ORGAN/GROUP/SEX
`Nncropsy Status: Interim/Schwinn Necropsy (K1), Excapt Deaths
`
`
`
`4 Week Interim Necropsy
`SPA!
`Females
`
`Doss Group
`1
`1
`Z
`1
`No. Animal: par Dos: Group
`TESTBS
`Na. ExaminedMD
`
`— Infiltration: mnnnuclear call
`Grade 1
`- Atrophy: aeminitarau: tubuleGrade 1
`THYHUS
`Na. Examined
`NAD
`No. Examined
`NAD
`Gradu 2
`No. banned
`MGUB
`NAD
`- Degeneration: skeletal muscle
`cell
`(Slide 1
`- Infiltration: mononucloar can
`crane i
`Gracia 2
`HA. Examined
`TRACHZA
`NAD
`No. mamined
`URINARY BMwER
`NAD
`- Infiltration: mnnnnuciear can
`Grade 1
`UTERUS
`No. ExaminedNM)
`VAGINA
`- Intimtionx :ubacute Grade 1
`Grade 2
`
`HAD - Nothing abnormal discovered
`Group
`1, Control, males: Smgliptin (a lbs/kg): remains: Sungliptin (0 lug/kg)
`Group
`3, Mid Dose. males- suagiiptin (m tug/k9); funnies: Smgiiptin (10 lug/kg)
`Group
`4, High Don, males: Snugliptin (20 lug/kg):
`females: Saxaglipfln (20 rug/kg)
`
`m
`m- men ———
`- Erosion
`conl‘d.
`Grade 2
`
`OVAIuES
`No. ExaminedNAD
`- Hinnralization
`Grade 2
`FANCIE“
`ND. RammedMAD
`PARATHYRDID CLANDS Nu. ExaminedNAD
`- Cyst: multiiocuuted
`and: 3
`PERIPHER. NERVEHS)
`NO. 3(3)“anHAD
`no. Exlmlned
`NM)
`lb. namined
`PROSTATE GLAND
`NA!)
`- Infiltration: woman-nuclear cell
`Grade 1
`Grads 2
`
`PITUITARY GLAND
`
`2
`2
`
`2
`1
`)
`-
`1
`
`SKIN/SUBCMIS
`
`i
`-
`1
`
`I
`1
`
`-
`-
`
`Dose Group
`No. Animus per Dose Group
`SHINAL VEICLES
`No. ExaminedNAB
`No. BannedNAD
`- Infiltration: mononuclear cell
`Gradu l
`Grade 2
`— Eden:
`Grade 4
`SFINAL CORD, CERVICJIO. ExaminedNAB
`- Axunai spnurom
`Grade 1
`SPINAL CORD. LINEAR No. ExaminedNM!
`2
`SPLE'KN
`Rn. Examined
`1
`NAD
`~ Hyperplasia:
`lymphoid
`-
`1
`Grade 1
`-
`i
`
`- Any1oid
`2
`-
`Grade 1
`i
`-
`Grade 2
`i
`-
`
`STOMMJH
`No. Examined
`2
`2
`MD
`1
`-
`— Inflammation: subacute
`2
`Grade 1
`-
`1
`Grade 2
`1
`Grade 3
`Grade 1
`Grade 2
`Nu. ExaminedNAD
`TAIL
`- Inflammation: sublcuta
`Grade 2
`Grade 4
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Fred Alavi Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-350
`
`NUMBER OF ANIMALS WITH MICROSCOPIC FINDINGS B! ORGAN/GROUP/SEX
`Necropsy Status: Interim/Scheduled. Necropsy (K2)
`6 week Interim Necropsy
`
`
`Sex
`
`
`Dose Group
`No. Animals per Dose Group
`
`
`No . ExaminedMD
`KIDNEYS
`
`
` Mineralization
`Grade 2
`
` Inflammation: chronic
`
`Grade 2
`
`Giant cell: multinucleatedGrade 1
`
`
`
`Infiltration: mononuclear cell
`Grade 1
`'-
`
`Grade 2
`
`Fibroplasia/tibrosie
`Grade 1
`
`
`
` LACRIMAL GLANDS No . Examined“AD
`
`
`
`LIVER No. Examined
`
`
`
`- Vacuolation: hepatocyteGrade 2
`
` - Inflammation: subacute Grade 1
`Grade 3
`
`- Infiltration: mononuclear cell
`Grade 1
`
`
` LUNG No. maminedNM)
`
`
` Mteritis
`Grade 3
`
` Histiocytosis: alveolar space
`Grade 1
`
`
`Inflammation: subacute
`Grade 3
`
`Inflammation : chronic Grade 1
`
`
`M.QUADR1CEPS E‘EMORISNO . Examined
`
`
`- Infiltration: mononuclear cell
`Grade 1
`
`
`- Inflammation: vascular
`3_
`Grade 1
`1
`
`
`Grade 2
`2
`
`Grade 3
`-
`ND. ExaminedMD
`- Inflammation: subacute
`
`MAMMARY GLAND
`
`Grade 2
`— Infiltration: mononuclear cell
`Grade 1
`MANDIB. LYHPH NODB NO. Examined
`HAD
`
`- Histiocytosis: sinus
`
`Grade 2
`
`1
`1
`
`3
`3
`
`l
`1
`
`2
`l
`1
`1
`
`
`
`NUMBER OF ANIMALS WITH MICROSCOPIC FINDINGS BY ORGAN/GROUP/SEX
`Necropsy status: Interim/Scheduled Necropsy (K2)
`
`6 Week Interim
`Necropsy
`
`
`sex
`Dose Group
`No. Animals per Dose Group
`ADRENAL GLANDS
`No. ExaminedNAD
`No. Examined
`NAD
`No. ExaminedNAD
`BONE mason, STERNUMNO. Examined
`MAD
`
`AORTA
`
`BONE MARROW. RIB
`
`— Hyperplasia:
`
`BONE, RIB
`
`some, 51mm:
`
`BRAIN
`
`lymphoid
`
`Grade 1
`Grade 2
`Na. Examined
`HAD
`
`No. Examined
`HAD
`No. Examined
`HAD
`
`— Mineralization
`
`Grade 1
`— Infiltration: mononuclear cell
`Grade 1
`Grade 2
`
`CECUM
`
`No. Examined
`“AD
`
`— Inflammation: subacute
`
`Grade 1
`
`— Inflammation: vascular
`
`1
`-
`1
`3
`3
`
`3
`3
`3
`1
`-
`-
`2
`2
`-
`
`3
`2
`1
`1
`-
`-
`
`
`
`CERVIX
`
`Grade 2
`No. ExaminedNAD
`- Inflammation: vascular
`
`COLON
`
`Grade 2
`No. Examined
`3
`HAD
`1
`
`- Parasite
`1
`- Inflammation: vascular Grade 2
`1
`- Giant cell: multinucleated
`1
`Grade 1
`-
`Gra

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket