throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`22-341
`
`MICROBIOLOGY REVIEW! S)
`
`

`

`Product Quality Microbiology Review
`
`4 MARCH 2009
`
`NBA: 22-341
`
`Drug Product Name
`Proprietary: Victoza
`Non-proprietary: liraglutide
`Drug Product Priority Classification: S
`
`Review Number: 1
`
`Dates of Submission(s) Covered by this Review
`Review
`Request
`6/5/2008
`
`.
`.
`Assrgned to Rev1ewer
`6/9/2008
`
`Letter
`5/23/2008
`
`Stamp
`5/23/2008
`
`Submission History (for amendments only): N/A
`
`Applicant/Sponsor
`Name: Novo Nordisk Inc.
`
`Address: 100 College Road West, Princeton, NJ 08540
`Representative: Mary Ann McElligott
`Telephone: 609—987-5 831
`
`Name of Reviewer: Bryan S. Riley, Ph.D.
`
`Conclusion: Recommended for Approval
`
`

`

`NDA 22—341 (Victoza)
`
`Microbiology Review #1
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Product Quality Microbiology Data Sheet
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`TYPE OF SUBMISSION: Original NDA 505(b)(1)
`
`SUBMISSION PROVIDES FOR: A sterile parenteral drug product
`
`MANUFACTURING SITE: Novo Nordisk
`
`Bagsvaerd, Denmark
`
`DOSAGE FORM, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION AND
`
`. STRENGTH/POTENCY: Sterile preserved aqueous solution in a 3 mL
`glass pen-fill cartridge for SC injection, 6 mg/mL.
`
`METHOD(S) OF STERILIZATION:
`
`
`
`Fill
`
`PHARMACOLOGICAL CATEGORY: Control of Type 2 Diabetes.
`
`SUPPORTING/RELATED DOCUMENTS: DMFs 21494 and M
`
`REMARKS: This was an eCTD submission. An IQA was performed by ONDQA
`(dated 7/2/2008). The majority of the sterility assurance information was provided
`in Type V DMF 21494 (Novo Nordisk). The submission also contained a
`Comparability Protocol for the Addition of Clayton, NC as an additional
`manufacturing site (see Section R. Regional Information).
`
`m4)
`
`m4)
`
`filename: N022341R1.doc
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`Microbiology Review #1
`NDA 22—341 (Victoza)
`
`
`Executive Summary
`
`1.
`
`Recommendations
`
`A.
`
`Recommendation on Approvability — This submission is
`recommended for approval on the basis of product quality
`microbiology.
`
`B.
`
`Recommendations on Phase 4 Commitments and/or
`
`Agreements, if Approvable — N/A
`
`II.
`
`Summary of Microbiology Assessments
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Brief Description of the Manufacturing Processes that relate to
`Product Quality Microbiology — The drug product is sterile
`-,__——————————*
`filled.
`
`m4)
`
`Brief Description of Microbiology Deficiencies — N/A
`
`Assessment of Risk Due to Microbiology Deficiencies — N/A
`
`III.
`
`Administrative
`
`A.
`
`Reviewer's Signature
`
`
`
`Bryan S. Riley, PhD.
`
`B.
`
`Endorsement Block
`
`
`
`James L. McVey
`Microbiology Team Leader
`
`C.
`
`CC Block
`N/A
`
`_—____—_—_————_—-——-—-—
`
`Page 3 of8
`
`

`

`5
`
`Page(s) Withheld
`
`\/
`
`Trade Secret / Confidential (b4)
`
`Draft Labeling (b4)
`
`Draft Labeling (b5)
`
`Deliberative Process (b5)
`
`Withheld Track Number: Microbiology-
`
`1
`
`

`

`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`
`Bryan Riley .
`3/5/2009 01:01:27 PM
`MICROBIOLOGIST
`
`James MCVey
`3/10/2009 10:50:47 AM
`MICROBIOLOGIST
`I concur.
`
`

`

`PRODUCT QUALITY MICROBIOLOGY FILING CHECKLIST
`Letter Date: 5/23/2008
`
`Applicant: Novo Nordisk Inc
`
`NDA Number: 22-341
`Drug Name: Victoza
`
`NDA Type: 505(b)(1)
`
`Stamp Date: 5/23/2008
`
`+
`
`The following are necessary to initiate a review of the NDA application:
`
`
`Content Parameter
`Yes_TI_ No
`Comments
`
`
`Is the product quality microbiology information described
`Information provided
`1
`in the NDA and organized in a manner to allow substantive X
`m the NDA and in
`
`review to begin? Is it legible, indexed, and/or paginated
`DMF 21494
`
`
`'I
`.
`.
`adequately?
`
`
`Has the applicant submitted an overall description ofthe
`2
`Information PYOYlded
`
`manufacturing processes and microbiological controls used X
`in the NDA and in
`
`in the manufacture ofthe drugproduct?
`DMF 21494
`
`
`
`Has the applicant submitted protocols and results of
`Information provided
`3
`
`validation studies concerning microbiological control
`In DMF 21494
`X
`
`processes used in the manufacture of the drug product?
`
`4
`Are any study reports or published articles in a foreign
`
`language? Ifyes, has the translated version been included
`X
`in the submission for review?
`_.
`
`5
`Has the applicant submitted preservative effectiveness
`Information provided
`
`studies (if applicable) and container-closure integrity
`in the NDA and in
`X
`studies?
`DMF 21494
`
`+
`6
`Has the applicantsubmittedmicrobiological specifications
`Informationprovided
`
`
`
`for the drug product and a description ofthe test methods?
`X
`in the NDA and in
`
`+
`DMF 21494
`
`7
`Has the applicant submitted the results of analytical method
`Information provided
`verification studies?
`X
`1n DMF 21494
`
`
`8
`Has the applicant submitted all special/critical studies/data
`requested during pre-submission meetings and/or
`discussions?
`
`
`
`
` Is this NDA fileable? If not, then describe why. ,
`
`
`X
`
`t
`
`Additional Comments: The application includes a Comparability Protocol for an additional
`manufacturing site for the drug product (Novo Nordisk, Clayton, NC, USA).
`
`23 June 2008
`
`//Date ‘
`Bryan S. Riley, Ph.D.
`Senior Review Microbiologist, OPS/NDMS
`
`//Date
`James L. McVey
`OPS/NDMS Team Leader
`
`

`

`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`
`Bryan Riley
`6/23/2008 11:30:42 AM
`MICROBIOLOGIST
`
`James McVey
`6/23/2008 01:54:22 PM
`MICROBIOLOGIST
`I concur
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket