throbber
Reviewer: Anthony L Parola, PhD
`
`NDA 22,341
`
`liraglutide increased absolute and relative weight of pancreas at all doses in both sexes in 28—day and 52-
`week studies (HEM 3 1X). In 5 mg/kg high dose monkeys in the 52-week study, increased pancreas
`weight was due to an increase in the mass of pancreas exocrine cells and ducts, but liraglutide had no
`effect on beta cell mass.
`
`Postmarketing cases of acute pancreatitis have been reported in exenatide treated patients. There '
`was a numerical imbalance in the number of reported pancreatitis cases in clinical trials of liraglutide with
`a larger number of cases and a higher rate in liraglutide treated groups.
`
`Other Effects
`In the 104-week carcinogenicity study in mice, liraglutide caused tubular cystic hyperplasia in
`thymus in males at all doses (0.03, 0.2, l, 3 mg/kg/day, HEM 3 0.2X) and in females at 3 0.2 mg/kg/day
`(HEM 3 2X). In the 52-week toxicity study in monkeys, group mean relative thymus weight (normalized
`to body weight) was 21.5 — 26.8% lower than controls in males at all liraglutide doses (0.05, 0.5, 5
`mg/kg/day) (HEM 3 1X) with correlative microscopic findings of atrophy.
`In the 104 week mouse carcinogenicity study, centrilobular hypertrophy of hepatocytes and
`diffuse centrilobular hepatocyte vacuolation occurred in males at all liraglutide doses (0.03, 0.2, l, 3
`mg/kg/day, HEM 3 0.2X)). In the same study, femoro-tibial degenerative joint disease occurred in male
`and female mice at all doses (HEM 3 0.2X).
`
`Genetic Toxicity
`Liraglutide was not mutagenic or clastogenic, with or without metabolic activation, in an Ames
`bacterial mutagenicity assay or chromosomal aberrations assay in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.
`Liraglutide did not induce micronuclei in bone marrow polychromatic erythrocytes from rats treated with
`up to 30 mg/kg liraglutide for 4 days or up to 1 mg/kg (HEM 11X) for 28 days.
`
`Carcinogenicity
`In 2—year life—time exposure carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats, liraglutide was a non-
`genotoxic, multisex, multispecies rodent carcinogen causing thyroid C—cell tumors in male and female
`rats and mice and fibrosarcomas on the dorsal skin and subcutis in male mice.
`
`In the mouse carcinogenicity study, the NOAEL for neoplastic findings was 0.2 mg/kg/day
`liraglutide (safety margin 2) based on thyroid C-cell adenomas in males and females and combined C-cell
`adenomas and carcinomas in females at 3 1 mg/kg/day liraglutide (HEM 3 10X). Liraglutide caused focal
`C-cell hyperplasia, a preneoplastic lesion, at 3 0.2 mg/kg/day in males and females (HEM 3 2X). C-cells
`secrete calcitonin, and in mice, plasma calcitonin increased at 3 0.2 mg/kg/day and it was a biomarker for
`increased C-cell focal hyperplasia and tumors. In males, fibrosarcomas on the dorsal skin and subcutis
`occurred at 3 mg/kg/day liraglutide. Equivocal finding of dose-related dorsal skin and subcutis
`rhabdomyosarcoma and injection site fibrosarcomas in males, and incidences in the 3 mg/kg/day group
`were above the historical control range for both tumors, but the increased incidence for either finding
`never reached statistical significance in any liraglutide group. Dorsal skin and subcutis tumors were likely
`related to the high local concentration of liraglutide at or near injection sites, so comparison of systemic
`exposure is not relevant for risk assessment. The liraglutide concentrations in high dose drug formulation
`was 0.6 mg/mL, lO-times lower than the 6 mg/mL concentration in the clinical formulation.
`In the rat carcinogenicity study, liraglutide dose-dependently caused thyroid C—cell adenomas at 3
`0.25 mg/kg/day in males (HEM 3 2X) and at 3 0.075 mg/kg/day in females (HEM 3 0.5K), C-cell
`carcinomas at 0.75 mg/kg/day in males (HEM 8X), and combined C-cell adenomas or carcinomas at 3
`0.25 mg/kg/day in males (HEM 32X) and at 3 0.075 mg/kg in females (HEM 3 0.5X). The incidence of
`C—cell carcinomas, a rare tumor in rats, was above concurrent and historical controls at 3 0.075 mg/kg/day
`liraglutide in males (HEM 3 0.5X) and at 3 0.25 mg/kg/day in females (HEM 3 2X).
`’
`To determine human relevance of liraglutide-induced rodent thyroid C-cell tumors, Novo Nordisk
`proposed a novel mode-of-action based on drug-induced, GLP-lR-mediated calcitonin secretion and
`synthesis driving C-cell hyperplasia with progression of hyperplasia to tumors, and they performed an
`
`294of513
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Anthony L Parola, PhD
`
`.
`
`NDA 22,341
`
`extensive series of mechanistic studies to evaluate it. However, mechanistic studies did not adequately
`support the proposed mode of action. CDER’s Executive Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee
`(December 2008 meeting) and a large majority of members from a April 2009 Advisory Committee
`convened to evaluate the safety of liraglutide both concluded there was insufficient evidence to determine
`that liraglutide-induced C-cell tumors in mice and rats are not relevant to humans.
`Until recently, liraglutide was the only investigational or marketed drug known to cause C-cell
`tumors in both mice and rats, but data from other marketed and investigational GLP- 1R agonists suggest
`persistent GLP-lR activation cause C—cell tumors in both species. The human relevance of liraglutide-
`induced thyroid C-cell tumors in rodents is unknown.
`
`Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity
`
`Reproductive Toxicity
`In a definitive combined fertility and embryofetal developmental toxicity study in rats, the
`NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was 1 mg/kg liraglutide in males (HEM 11X) and 0.25 mg/kg in
`females (HEM 2X). .Although liraglutide decreased the absolute weight of seminal vesicles, prostate, and
`epididymis at 3 0.25 mg/kg (estimated HEM _>_ 2X), it had no effect on reproductive performance.
`Furthermore, in a 13—week toxicity study in rats, up to 1 mg/kg/day liraglutide (HEM 14X) did not
`increase abnormalities of eosin—stained sperm from cauda epididymis. Four weeks of treatment with 1
`mg/kg/day liraglutide decreased CYP2A1 (hepatic steroid hydroxylase, testosterone 7 oc-hydroxylase
`activity) ~2-fold in liver of male rats, but a relationship between decreased liver CYP2A1 activity and
`decreased weight of male reproductive organs in rats was not established. Decreased testosterone
`hydroxylase activity should increase circulating levels of testosterone. In the definitive combined fertility
`and embryofetal development study, liraglutide increased early embryonic deaths in females at 1 mg/kg
`(HEM 11X).
`In the 104-week mouse carcinogenicity study, lymphocyte infiltration occurred in seminal
`vesicles at 2 0.03 mg/kg/day liraglutide (HEM 3 0.2X).
`
`Developmental Toxicity
`Distribution and excretion studies show rat and rabbit fetuses were exposed to liraglutide in utero
`and liraglutide was excreted intact in milk of lactating rats. Although intact liraglutide was secreted in
`milk, since it’s a lipidated peptide, oral bioavailability was likely to be very low in nursing pups. In a
`definitive combined fertility and embryofetal development toxicity study in rats, the maternal NOAEL
`was 0.25 mg/kg liraglutide (safety margin 2) due to clinical signs of toxicity (hunched posture, rolling
`gate) at 1 mg/kg (HEM 11X). The NOAEL for fetal toxicity was < 0.1 mg/kg liraglutide based on fetal
`abnormalities of displaced kidneys, displaced azygous vein, and small additional ossified area within the
`cranial structure or fontanel at 3 0.1 mg/kg. A more complete state of ossification in fetuses from
`liraglutide treated groups compared to controls was noted. Major fetal abnormalities were misshaped
`oropharynx and/or narrowed opening to the larynx at 0.1 mg/kg and umbilical hernia at 0.1 and 0.25
`mg/kg, but they occurred without relation to liraglutide dose.
`In a definitive embryofetal development toxicity study in New Zealand White rabbits, all tested
`doses yielded estimated liraglutide plasma AUC0-241, below clinical exposure. The maternal NOAEL was
`0.05 mg/kg, the highest dose tested. Reduced food consumption, body weight gain, and body weight were
`considered pharmacologic effects in pregnant females, but reduced maternal weight may have impacted
`fetal development andreducing fetal weight. The NOAEL for fetal toxicity was < 0.01 mg/kg liraglutide
`based on decreased fetal weight compared to controls, dose—related increased fetal and litter incidence in
`total fetal malformations (2.1%, 3.7%, 5.7%, and 7.6% of fetuses and 18%, 30%, 35%, and 32% of litters
`affected by major abnormalities at 0, 0.0], 0.025, and 0.05 mg/kg/day liraglutide, respectively), fetal
`malformations (microopthalmia with or without retinal fold, forelimb flexure, right kidney represented by
`small area of tissue with attached cyst, curved scapula), and minor abnormalities (bilobed or bifurcated
`gall bladder, intermediate lung lobe absent, jugals fiised to maxilla, superior angle or lamina of axis
`
`295 of513
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Anthony L Parola, PhD
`
`
`NDA 22 341
`
`incompletely ossified, slight downward pelvic shift, slight asymmetric alignment of pelvic bones) at 0.01
`mg/kg or Z 0.01 mg/kg. Fetal malformations occurred at 0.025 mg/kg (2 fetuses from 2 different litters
`with hydrocephaly, hepatic duct diverticulum, displaced or herniated umbilica, branchyury, dilated
`pulmonary trunk with incomplete aortic arch and malrotated heart, displaced umbilicus with part of the
`intestines fused to the umbilical vein, and split sternum). A minor abnormality of an additional liver lobe
`within the median cleft also occurred at 0.025 mg/kg. At 0.05 mg/kg, Malformations were connected
`parietal bones in 5 fetuses from 1 litter and dilated ascending aorta with narrow pulmonary trunk. Minor
`abnormalities at 0.05 mg/kg were corneal opacity, esophageal cyst, and kinked tail.
`Fetal abnormalities occurred in rats and rabbits at low multiples of human exposure (based on
`estimated AUC in pregnant rats or rabbits). Herniated umbilica, a malformation, occurred in both rats and
`rabbits, but the incidence was not related to liraglutide dose in either species. Increased fetal bone
`ossification was likely due to liraglutide treatment.
`
`Prenatal and Postnatal Development Toxicity
`Prenatal and postnatal toxicity of liraglutide was assessed in a multigenerational study in rats. The
`F0 maternal NOAEL was < 0.1 mg/kg liraglutide (HEM < 1X) based on clinical signs of toxicity at all
`.
`doses. The NOAEL for F0 reproductive toxicity was < 0.1 mg/kg liraglutide (HEM < 1X) based on a
`dose—related increased incidence of continuing gestation to day 22 (33%, 58%, 67%, and 96% of litters
`delivered on day 22 at 0, 0.1, 0.25, and 1 mg/kg liraglutide, respectively) with increased gestation
`duration from 21.3 to 22.0 days at 1 mg/kg (HEM 11X). Liraglutide had no effect on maternal behavior or
`F1 pup survival, post-natal development prior to weaning (physical development, functional development,
`or sexual maturation), or post—weaning sexual maturation rate. The NOAEL for postnatal toxicity in the
`F1 generation was < 0.1 mg/kg based on dose-dependent decreased body weight from lactation day 7 to
`day 21. In the postweaning period, body weight of F1 rats was lower than controls at all liraglutide doses
`(3 0.1 mg/kg) in males from postpartum day 7 to week 16 and in females at 0.1 and 1 mg/kg from
`postpartum day 7 to week 10. In weaned F] rats, clinical observations of greasy coat occurred at 3 0.1
`mg/kg in males and females. Bleeding scab and agitated behavior occurred in weaned 1 mg/kg F1 males
`and an increased incidence of scabs in males and females treated with 1 mg/kg liraglutide was noted at
`necropsy. The NOAEL for fertility, mating performance, or reproductive performance of F1 rats was 1
`mg/kg liraglutide (administered to F0 rats only). The NOAEL for development toxicity of F2 rats was 1
`mg/kg (administered to F0 rats only).
`
`Qualification of Impurities and Excipients
`Liraglutide, the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API)1n Victoza, is produced by acylating
`recombinant human Arg34GLP—1(7-37), produced1n Saccharomyces cerevisiae, with hexadecanoic acid
`(palmitic acid) at lysine 26 using a glutamate linker to yield liraglutide (Naé-(N--h—exadecanoyl—L-'Y-
`g1utamyl)—3Arg4GLP-1(7-3—7)). Impurities1n liraglutide were aw “ related impurities, "~— r-elated
`impurities, (impurities
`
`impurities.
`Liraglutide—related impurities were categorized as liraglutide-related impurities A, B, or C, or
`other ;-—-————————-
`related impurities based on HPLC elution characteristics relative to
`liraglutide.'W In
`
`degradation studies, elevated temperatures and humidity1ncrease' ~v
`related impurities
`(/ fold) and “related impurities/ fold), category B impurities / —— fold), and total
`impurities (/ fold). Exposing the drug substance (packaged1n glass vials) to light fl
`
`
`molecular weight protein/ fold), other
`impurities (/. fold), other
`impurities
`/ fold), and total impurities (/ fold), but there were no unique photo-degradation products. ChangesIn
`the drug substance manufacturing process during development resulted1n some changes1n the impurity
`profile. Repeat—dose toxicity of drug substance impurities in late—stage development batch that had
`undergone forced ‘fi 5 were assessed in a 4—week study in rats.
`
`13(4)
`
`M41
`
`296 of513
`
`

`

`53(4)
`
`Reviewer: Anthony L Parola, PhD
`
`NDA 22,341
`
`Process—related impurities were not detected in the drug substance. The/' step manufacturing
`process includes fermentation (steps / ), recovery (steps / ), purification of the liraglutide precursor
`(steps / J), acylation (step
`), and purification and —-- . (steps _ ,). The acylating agent is /
`
`W’
`
`‘
`_ _
`7
`pilot and production scale batches tested (see Chemistry Review 1, page 37).
`~-———_—~—-—-—_=—u-==-
`Levels of these process-related impurities are below the threshold of toxicological concern for genotoxic
`impurities (1.5 mcg/daily dose).
`The final drug product, liraglutide injection, is an aqueous formulation of 6 mg/mL liraglutide,
`1.4 mg/mL disodium phosphate dihydrate, 14 mg/mL propylene glycol, and 5.5 mg/mL phenol at pH 8.15
`
`in an ' 1 _
`_ ‘filled glass cartridge containing 3 mL liraglutide solution. The glass cartridge is inserted
`
`into a multiple dose pen injector for subcutaneous injection. The drug product is stable for
`
`. Liraglutide is light sensitive and should be stored in the
`capped pen injector protected from light. There were no unique impurities in the drug product, so
`impurities qualification are the same as for the drug substance. Excipients are qualified by existing safety
`data.
`
`_ /
`
`Toxicity of impurities in the final to—be-marketed formulation, formulation 4,containing 6.0
`mg/mL liraglutide in solution at pH 8.15 was adequately assessed in subcutaneous repeat-dose toxicity
`studies, but not in genetic toxicity studies. In chronic repeat-dose toxicity studies, liraglutide caused
`irreversible injection site reactions in monkeys using drug formulations that were at least 3-fold more
`dilute than the clinical formulation. Fibrosarcomas occurred in the dorsal skin and subcutis of male mice.
`This carcinogenic effect of liraglutide at or near the injection site in mice may not be GLP- lR—mediated
`and it occurred using a liraglutide dosing formulation that was lO-times less concentrated than the clinical
`formulation. Genetic toxicity of liraglutide impurities at levels consistent with drug substance and drug
`product acceptance criteria should be evaluated.
`
`Unresolved Toxicology Issues
`
`1. Human relevance of liraglutide-induced thyroid C-cell tumors in rats and mice is unknown.
`
`2. Local toxicity after repeat dosing with liraglutide was not adequately assessed in nonclinical
`studies because liraglutide concentrations in nonclinical formulations used in repeat—dose toxicity
`and carcinogenicity studies were substantially lower than the liraglutide concentration in the
`clinical formulation.
`
`3. Genetic toxicity of some liraglutide impurities were not adequately assessed in vitro.
`
`Recommendations: Not approvable. Please see ‘Recommendations of Approvability’ on page 1.
`
`Suggested Labeling: Please see ‘Recommendations on labeling’ starting on page 1.
`
`297 0f513
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Anthony L Parola, PhD
`
`NDA 22,341
`
`APPENDICIES
`
`Appendix A: Mouse Carcinogenicity Study Review
`
`
`
`NNC 90—1 170 Tumor Findings in Male Mice
`
`Historical
`Organ/Tissue
`Incidence
`Parameter
`Neoplasm
`.
`incidence (%)
`
`o-cell adenoma
`
`Dorsal skin &
`.
`subcutis
`
`fibrosarcoma
`
`Injection site
`
`Equivocal
`(+ dose response,
`.
`lacking statistically
`significant increase in Dorsal .skm &
`at least the HD group)
`SUbCUtIS
`Equivocal
`(- dose response.
`statistically significant
`increase in at least 1
`dose group)
`
`Vascular (all
`sites)
`
`fibrosarcoma
`
`mabdomyosarwma
`
`hemangioma or
`hemangiosarcoma
`
`0
`.
`.
`____¥I}.°_,’SETEE_(..{‘EZ.
`p—value
`
`incidence (%)
`
`> 0.05 0.001 > 0.05 0.036
`pvalue
`
`Underlined values considered positive based on trend analysis p—value for rare (p < 0.025) or common (p < 0.005) tumors, p-value for
`pairwise comparison to the control group for rare (p < 0.05) or common (p < 0.01) tumors, and the incidence in the historical control group.
`
`NNC 90-1170 Tumor Findings in Female Mice
`
`Result
`
`Organ/Tissue
`
`Neoplasm
`
`Historical
`.
`Incidence
`
`c—cell ad enoma
`
`Positive
`
`.
`TherId
`
`,
`c-cell carcrnoma
`
`ccell adenoma or
`carcrnoma
`
`Parameter
`
`incidence (%)
`p—value
`
`incidence (%)
`p—value
`
`incidence (%)
`
`Underlined values considered positive based on trend analysis p—value for rare (p < 0.025) or common (p < 0.005) tumors,
`p-value for pairwise comparison to the control group for rare (p < 0.05) or common (p < 0.01) tumors, and the incidence in
`the historical control group.
`
`Key study findings:
`0
`Subcutaneously injected NNC 90-1170 (dorsal surface) was a non-genotoxic carcinogen in male
`and female mice with treatment related neoplasms occurring in thyroid c-cells (males and
`females) and dorsal skin and subcutis (males).
`The NOAEL for neoplastic findings was 0.2 mg/kg/day NNC 90-1170 (uncorrected SM 1.8)
`based on increased incidence of thyroid c-cell adenomas in males and females and combined 0—
`cell adenomas / carcinomas at 3 1 mg/kg/day NNC 90-1170. Focal thyroid c-cell hyperplasia, a
`preneoplastic finding, occurred at 2 0.2 mg/kg/day.
`
`0
`
`298of513
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Anthony L Parola PhD
`NDA 22 341
`
`o NNC 90-1170 dose-dependently increased the incidence of focal thyroid c-cell hyperplasia, a
`preneoplastic lesion, at 3 0.2 mg/kg/day in males and females, dose-dependently increased the
`incidence of thyroid c-cell adenomas at 3 1 mg/kg/day in males and females (uncorrected
`human exposure multiple (uHEM) 10), and increased the incidence of combined c-cell adenomas
`/ carcinomas at 3 1 mg/kg/day in females (uHEM 10).
`0 Between weeks 25 and 104, plasma calcitonin levels increased > 2 fold at 3 mg/kg/day in
`males and females.
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0 A positive finding of dorsal skin and subcutis fibrosarcomas at 3 mg/kg/day NNC 90-1170 in
`males (uHEM 45). There was an equivocal finding of dose-related dorsal skin and subcutis
`rhabdomyosarcoma and injection site fibrosarcomas in males, and incidences in the 3
`mg/kg/day group (uHEM 45) were above the historical control range for both tumors, but the
`increased incidence for either finding never reached statistical significance in any NNC 90—1 170
`group. The sponsor’s analysis of tumor incidence data grouping total sarcomas dorsal surface
`skin and subcutis was statistically significant for trend (p < 0.001) and pair-wise analysis
`compared to controls at 3 mg/kg/day NNC 90-1170 in males (p < 0.001, uHEM 45). In control
`group females, there was a high incidence of total sarcomas in the skin and subcutis.
`Equivocal findings in males occurred in the vasculature (hemangiomas / hemangiosarcomas at
`all sites at 0.2 mg/kg/day), but the increased incidence was not dose related.
`The NOAEL for non-neoplastic findings was < 0.03 mg/kg/day. Non—neoplastic findings
`occurred in thyroid (inflammatory cell infiltrate at 2 0.03 mg/kg/day in males and at 0.03 and 3
`mg/kg/day in females; focal c-cell hyperplasia, considered a preneoplastic lesion, at 3 0.2
`mg/kg/day in males and females), liver (pigmented Kupffer cells (attributed to hemosiderin
`accumulation) at 3 0.03 mg/kg/day in males and at 3 0.2 mg/kg/day in females, centrilobular
`hypertrophy, diffuse centrilobular hepatocyte vacuolation at 2 003 mg/kg/day in males), spleen
`(hemosiderin accumulation at 2 0.03 mg/kg/day in females), femoro-tibial joint (degenerative
`disease at 3 0.03 mg/kg/day in males and at 0.03, 1, and 3 mg/kg/day in females), seminal
`vesicles (lymphocytic infiltration at Z 0.03 mg/kg/day and inflammation at 0.03 and 3 mg/kg/day
`in males), and thymus (tubular cystic hyperplasia at 3 0.03 mg/kg/day in males and at 3 0.2
`mg/kg/day in females).
`0 Methodological / Protocol isues:
`0 Due to low survival of control group females in the main study group, termination of the
`78 week interim sacrifice group was cancelled and treatment was continued for 104
`weeks. Tumor analysis was performed after combining results from both main study and
`week 78/ 104 groups.
`0 Actual NNC 90— 1170 concentrations were up to 3 fold lower than the nominal
`concentration for the 0.03 mg/kg/day dosing solution. However, human risk assessment is
`based on comparative exposure.
`0 Mice used for assessment of anti-liraglutide antibodies in week 104 survived 104 weeks
`of treatment (week 78/104 week group with treatment of 78 week interim sacrifice group
`extended to week 104), but these mice were sacrificed 10 days after the last dose to
`washout residual liraglutide that could potentially interfere with the anti-liraglutide
`antibody assay. These mice were included in the carcinogenicity assessment.
`Ophthalmoscopic examinations were not performed.
`0 Validation of the commercial rat plasma immunoradiometric assay to measure mouse
`plasma calcitonin was not submitted in the NDA, although the report references 2 assay
`validation reports (reports 205089 and restandardization report 205189).
`0 Although transient weight loss and food consumption occurred in the first weeks of the
`study, a pharmacodynamic effect of NNC 90-1170 was not sustained over the entire
`study period.
`
`0
`
`299 of513
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Anthony L Parola, PhD
`
`NDA 22,341
`
`Adequacy of the carcinogenicig study and appropriateness of the test mode]:
`Mice are pharmacologically responsive to subcutaneously administered NNC 90-1170
`(transiently decreased body weight and food consumption in CD-l mice, lowered blood glucose in
`diabetic ob/ob and diabetic db/db mice, and increased beta cell mass in db/db mice) and in the
`carcinogenicity study, mice did not mount a neutralizing antibody response. Protein binding of NNC 90-
`1170 is slightly higher in mice than in humans. There are no major metabolites of lipid—labeled 3H-[Pal]—
`liraglutide in humans, but metabolism of 3H-[Pal]-liraglutide is similar in vivo and in vitro in mice and
`humans. In vitro metabolism of peptide-labeled 3H—[tyr]-liraglutide is similar in mice and humans, but in
`vivo metabolism was not characterized in either species.
`
`Evaluation of tumor findings:
`Treatment-related neoplastic lesions occurred in thyroid (c—cell adenomas at 3 1 mg/kg/day in
`males and females, c—cell adenomas / carcinomas at 2 1 mg/kg/day in females) and dorsal skin and
`subcutis (fibrosarcomas at 3 mg/kg/day in males).
`
`CAC concurrence:
`
`- The Committee concurred that the study was acceptable based on tumor findings in males and females.
`~ The Committee concurred that thyroid C-cell adenomas, C-cell adenomas or carcinomas (combined),
`and dorsal skin and subcutis fibrosarcomas were drug related. Liraglutide significantly increased the
`incidence of thyroid c-cell adenomas at 3 1 mg/kg in males and females, C-cell adenomas and carcinomas
`(combined) at 3 1 mg/kg in females, and dorsal skin and subcutis fibrosarcomas at 3 mg/kg in males.
`
`Study no.: 204229 (sponsor), 457274 5”
`Submission, Module, and page #: N000 42.3.4.1.1, pages 1 — 3096
`Conducting laboratory and location:
`~W
`Date of study initiation: 23 November 2004
`Study ending date: 1 December 2007
`GLP compliance: Yes (OECD compliance claimed)
`QA report: yes (X) no ( )
`Drug, lot #, and % purity: NNC 90-1170 lots shown in the table below. Purity of 97.1% by RP—HPLC
`reported for lot PQ50365 only (certificate of analysis in Appendix B).
`
`Test new
`Batch No.
`lfiuiis
`Arrival Date
`Expiry Date
`
`PQSQHB
`934
`(3? October 2004
`12 August 2005
`
`m4)
`
`NNC 9ft-I 1 m
`6.25 or 6.0 mgfml limglutide
`
`I’QSOSGS
`3‘)
`l (i-June»0§
`l LMarchJI)?
`
`PQSOM?
`541$
`21 July 3005
`,
`14 March 2001‘:
`____.____.
`18 January 3006
`l 1 September 2006
`
`P050365
`
`500
`
`PQSOIGS
`
`25.0
`
`06 July 2006
`
`ll September 2007
`
`3.90
`RQfil)S 74
`
`
`()6 September 2006
`
`‘28 March 300?
`
`Typical Certificates of Analysis for a batch of test item and vehicle used are presented in
`Appendix B and Appendix (I
`
`[N000 4.2.3.411 P15]
`
`Methods
`
`Doses: 0 (vehicle), 0.03, 0.2, 1.0, 3.0 mg/kg/day NNC 90—1170
`Basis of dose selection (MTD, MFD, AUC etc. 1: AUC ratio > 25 in males and females.
`Species/strain: CD-1 mice (Crl:CD—1TM(ICR)BR)
`
`300 of513
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Anthony L Parola, PhD
`
`NDA 22,341
`
`Number/sex/group (main study 1: 50 /sex/dose main study. Due to mortality in main study control
`females, treatment of week 78 interim sacrifice group was extended to 104 weeks (29/sex/ 0 or
`3.0 mg/kg/day and 17/sex/ 0.03, 0.2, or 1.0 mg/kg/day)
`
`
`Animal Numbers
`Main Study
`Week 758
`(treatment extended to
`
`104 Weeks)
`Males
`Females
`Males
`Females
`
`1
`Central
`1)
`1'50
`251-300
`501—529
`610—638.
`
`Low
`0.03
`51.1110
`301-350
`5304346
`639-655
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 3 Intermediate 1 02 101-150 351-401) 547—563 656672
`4
`Intemwdime II
`1.0
`[SE-201}
`401-450
`564-580
`673-65?)
`
`5 6905.718 High 3.0 201-250 451400 581~6Cv9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Extra animals were numbered sequentially From 7 i 9 onwards.
`
`Treatment
`
`(mgikgfday)
`
`Group
`
`[NOOO 4.2.3.4.1.1 P18]
`
`
`Route formulation volume: subcutaneous injection (dorsal surface, rump and between scapula),
`6.0 — 6.25 mg/mL NNC 90-117 solution diluted in vehicle (1.4 mg/mL monosodium phosphate
`dehydrate, 14 mg/mL propylene glycol, 5.5 mg/mL phenol), 5.0 mL/kg
`Freguency of dosing: once a day
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics or special groups:
`78 week interim sacrifice group was planned, but treatment continued for 104 weeks due to
`decreased survival in main study control females.
`
`Satellite groupfor toxicokz'netics andplasma calcitonz‘n consisting of 17/sex/dose in each group
`terminated on weeks 26, 52, and 104.
`
`Animal Numbers
`Treamaem
`
`
`Week 26
`Week 52
`Week 104
`Group
`.
`(mgikgiday)
`Males
`Fenmles
`Males
`1~ exnales
`Males
`Femates
`
`Control
`‘
`0
`1001-1017
`1086—1102
`1171.113?
`1256-1272
`13414357
`1426-1442
`.E
`2
`Low
`'
`0.03
`1018—1034
`1103-1119
`USS-£204
`1273-1289
`1358-1374
`1443-1459
`
`1460-1476
`3
`Intermediate}
`0.2
`1035:1051
`1 l20«1136
`1205—1221
`12904306
`1375-1391
`Intermediateil
`1.0
`1052-1068
`1137-1153
`1222—1238
`1307-1323
`13924408
`14774493 12.4.2
`
`14944510
`1409-1425
`13244340
`1239—1255
`1154-1}70
`1069-1035
`3.0
`High
`A further 10 males (Numbers 151 H 520) and 10 femaies (1521»1530) were used for pretrial
`antibody level assessment. Extra animals were numbered from the last number used.
`[NOOO 4.2.3.4.].1 P18]
`Age and weight: 5 weeks on arrival with males weighing 27 .8-42.9g, and females weighing
`20.7-39.6 g at the start of the study
`Animal housing: One male and 2 or 3 females per cage by dose group were housed in suspended
`polypropylene cages (48 x 15 x 13 cm) with solid bottoms and stainless steel grid tops (including
`integral food hopper), sterilized white wood shavings (analysis revealed no significant
`contaminants), and a polycarbonate water bottle with a stainless steel nozzle (page 17).
`Restriction paradigm for dietaryflstriction studies: None.
`Drug stabilifl/homogeneity: Two different SOPs were used to determine stability of NNC 90—
`1170 solution for subcutaneous injection. Drug concentrations in O, 0.2, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg/day
`dosing solutions were analyzed using method 434-1018 and the 0.03 mg/kg/day dosing solution
`was analyzed using method 878-LP-08005. Dose solution samples were taken in week 1, week
`39, and week 103 on days 1 and 7.
`Dual controls employed: No, but controls included in satellite TK/calcitonin and 78 week interim
`sacrifice groups
`
`301 of513
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Anthony L Parola, PhD
`
`NDA 22,341
`
`Interim sacrifices: Due to reduced survival in main study control group females, dosing was
`continued to week 104 for 78 week interim sacrifice group.
`Deviations from original study protocol:
`Week 78 interim sacrifice group mice were rescheduled for sacrifice in week 104 with treatment
`continued to week 104 because of reduced survival in main study control group females.
`Therefore, a week 78 interim sacrifice group report was not issued.
`
`Sixteen males in group 5 were under-dosed on 17 February 2005 and 6 females in group 4 were
`underdosed on 28 April 2005. Both dosing errors were corrected by giving an additional dose
`volume to give the correct dose.
`
`The following TK group mice were dosed twice during toxicokinetic sampling in study week 52:
`Srwpfim mm $33}
`331
`
`
`
`[N000 4.2.3.411 P24]
`Due to scheduling errors, no samples were taken for the following study doses/time points in
`week 26:
`
`Group 2 predose
`Group 4 2 hour
`
`Additional thyroid processing in week 104 was going to be based on results from thyroid
`histology from mice from week 78 interim sacrifice group, but .this group was sacrificed in week
`104.
`
`The following summary table lists mice replaced during the first 2 weeks of dosing.
`Due m :1 numbered" deaths and c-lmical signed [1198 l'nilowing nlzimnl: rcgflummemsa were impale during
`the first [we weeks ufihc sandy.
`“fink?
`i
`' “.Afl/{h‘laln'hé
`('3;er
`Replrtcernwa ' Mnmufiémm
`'
`
`fimsanfi: him ‘
`Replaced
`$15;
`..
`Aninml
`V
`Repktwwnl
`comm
`.
`
`
`(1;,
`“
`Large Sauna»
`34;»)
`3?
`735
`V
`renew
`3
`3M
`m
`tuiim
`.
`‘
`
`'3‘“
`.....................
`.1
`,
`3m“ 04
`am
`501
`122
`Pound [ma
`
`1")
`mm
`
`,
`m
`4M
`324
`Ymmd
`ml
`
`an
`Mm] mm
`(FM M
`3M
`m
`201k a: ,,,,,
`MWWW ,
`cm i:
`:35
`3M
`m
`Tammi mm!
`
`A) De: IN
`543
`SM
`N g-
`r‘3‘“?“3’” 58m
`in)
`.,
`..
`,.
`Mam“!
`1
`v
`
`39?
`3F
`22.5
`‘D 1,)“ m
`l.s‘:siun
`w
`([2)
`;» WWW/M WWW
`7 Doc!
`
`TH Rlnml 134,1] E? 1’25
`’0,
`)4
`fmwmum
`
`
`
`
`
`[N000 4.2.3.4.1.1 P19]
`
`The following summary table lists toxicokinetic and antibody satellite group mice replaced during
`the first week of dosing.
`
`302 0f513
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Anthony L Parola, PhD
`
`NDA 22,341
`
`The following mtin‘ml replacmnmts were $90.1an during Week 1 orthe staggered satellite and
`antibody snugly.
`
`, u mu in re
`hp?
`«:1:
`‘cn'mn
`In
`.
`WWW 3,
`r Wmvfimfl
`«WWW
`,
`.
`,
`.
`- R 1 '
`ti‘manris Day)
`Renewed
`5:3;
`mama)
`mm," M ‘13 mum"
`'2 5m”
`r 133
`:4:
`use
`Fermi [ma
`t“)
`12 Jim i{IS
`fimramlm‘hr swellivrg prim so
`
`- W.
`0.13.
`“Ms ..
`,,
`“T
`m",
`.
`{astralrira thy uraium
`
`These mgrlilcemcms did not "fleet the integrity or outcome with: mainly.
`
`mooo 4.2.3.4.1.1 P19]
`
`Observation times
`
`Mortalig: Twice a day.
`Clinical signs: Main study mice checked twice a day with detailed examination performed once a week.
`Starting in week 83, clinical signs and detailed were recorded for week 78/104 group mice using the same
`schedule as main study group mice. Palpations for masses were performed beginning in week 13 for all
`mice. Satellite TK/calcitonin group mice and antibody group mice were examined daily for welfare
`purposes.
`Body weights: Recorded once a week prior to starting treatment, then daily during treatment. Body
`weight of main study mice was reported once a week.
`Food consumption: Quantity of food consumed by main study group mice (per cage) was recorded
`weekly until the end of week 13, then monthly afterward. For week 78/104 group mice, food consumption
`over a 4 week period (per cage) was recorded starting in week 83.
`Water consumption: Water consumption was monitored by visual inspection, but it wasn’t quantified.
`Anti-NNC 90-1170 antibody: Up to 1 mL orbital sinus blood samples from isoflurane anesthetized
`antibody study group mice (lO/sex/dose prior to initiating treatment, 5/sex/dose during treatment) was
`taken to determine if anti-NNC 90-1170 antibodies occurred after treatment. Mice were bled 3 days after
`their last dose in week 26 and 6 days after their last dose in weeks 52 and 78. Samples for antibody
`analysis were taken from week 104 satellite group mice bled 10 days after their last dose in week 97.
`Samples for antibody analysis from week 78 satellite group mice reassigned for termination in week 104
`were bled 10 days after the last dose. After bleeding mice were sacrificed and necropsied. The assay is a
`radioimmunoassay precipitating immunoglobulin bound 125I —liraglutide after overnight incubation of 125]
`—liraglutide with mouse plasma.
`In the absence of NNC 90-1170, the sensitivity of the anti—NNC 90-1170 antibody
`radioimmunoassay was 25 — 50 ng/mL. The assay sensitivity decreased to > 1 mcg/mL antibody at 3 10
`nM NNC 90-1170 in plasma. To decrease interfer

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket