throbber
Reviewer: Kathleen Young, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 22-304 1
`
`toxicity was reversible at the doses, routes and durations studied, based on absence of
`hepatotoxic findings afier treatment-free recovery periods.
`
`Dog:
`
`Repeated dose toxicology studies were conducted in Beagle dogs, with dosing durations
`of 10 and 28 days by the IV route, 9 days and 13-weeks by the SC route, and 2, 13, and
`52 weeks by oral gavage. The main target organs of toxicity in the dog were the CNS,
`and gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) systems.
`
`Intravenous toxicity was assessed in M and F dogs given tapentadol for up to 10
`consecutive days (1-7.5 mg/kg/day for 4 consecutive days with sacrifice 12 days afier the
`last dose in the first dose-escalation phase dogs, and 7.5 mg/kg/day for 10 consecutive
`days with sacrifice 24 hours after the last dose in the maintenance treatment (second
`study phase) dogs. The results showed transient, treatment-related salivation (M),
`restlessness and whimpering (F, 25 mg/kg/day), and rhinorrhea, panting, labored
`breathing, decreased activity and uncoordinated movements at 7.5 mg/kg/day, with
`lateral recumbency in the HD M and limb buckling in the HD F. The clinical signs were
`evident during or immediately after injection, and lasted approximately 1-3 hours after
`. the injections. There were slight decreases in food consumption in the M and F at 25
`mg/kg/day, and slight body weight loss in the HDF after treatment Day 2.. Moderate
`body weight loss was found in most HD animals at the end ofthe 10-day treatment
`period. There were observations at the HD cf increased glutamate dehydrogenase, total
`lipids, cholesterol, triglyceride, phospholipid, iron concentration and protein at the end of
`the study. Histopathology was not conducted in this Study, but the macroscopic
`examination showed red foci at the injection sites in HD dogs.
`
`A subsequent 4-week study on intravenous tapentadol toxicity in dogs (1-7.5 mg/kg/day)
`showed treatment-related clinical signs consistent with those observed in the 10-day
`study, with dose-related increases in incidence and severity of excessive salivation,
`decreased activity, hind-leg buckling uncoordinated movements, vomiting, urination,
`ventral recumbency and rhinorrhea beginning during or immediately after injection and
`lasting for 1-2 hours. Tachypnea, panting, retching, and defecation were seen with less
`frequency than were the other signs. Food consumption (F at 23 mg/kg/day and HD M)
`and body weights (HD F) were reduced in the F (23 mg/kg/day). There were no
`treatment-related effects on any other parameter, including ophthalmologic examinations,
`electrocardiograms (including QT interval), and inspection of the injection sites. Special
`assessments of microsomal drug metabolizing enzymes in the livers at necroscopy
`showed no inhibition or induction of P450 enzymes, and no effects on phase II
`aminophenol glucuronyl transferase activity.
`
`Subcutaneous tapentadol toxicity was tested in Beagle dogs dosed for a 7-9—day period
`(10 mg/kg b.i.d. followed by 7.5 mg/kg bid). The treatment-related findings were
`similar to those in the IV toxicology studies in dogs, and included CNS behavioral signs
`
`307 i
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`known to be associated with opioid receptor agonist activity. The observations were
`dose—related increases in incidence and severity of decreased activity, recumbency,
`tremor, salivation, somnolence, forelimb and hindlimb buckling, uncoordinated
`movements and occasional whimpering. The male dogs also showed vomiting, and
`occasional pale or loose feces and fecal mucus. Several dogs showed injection site
`swelling. Food intake and body weights were reduced in the first dosing week in both
`treatment periods, and resolved after increasing the duration of the feeding period over
`the remainder of the study period. The reversibility of reduced food consumption and
`body weights, and observed decreases in the severity of the behavioral effects may have
`also been related to development of partial tolerance to tapentadol effects.
`
`Two 3-month SC tapentadol toxicity studies were conducted in Beagle dogs (20-160
`mg/kg/day dose escalation phase for 13 days followed by 40 mg/kg/day treatment phase
`on Days 14-91 in the first study, and 4-16 mg/kg/day in the second study). One F dog
`given 16 mg/kg/day died on dosing day 17 in the second study. The treatment-related
`clinical signs were similar to those observed in the IV toxicity studies in dogs, and
`included dose related restlessness, decreased activity, drowsiness, fearfulness,
`vocalization, unsteady gait, hindlimb weakness, ventral recumbency, spontaneous
`urination and defecation, vomiting and salivation, with increased respiratory frequency
`and forced respiration in several animals beginning around 30 minutes after dosing and
`lasting for up to 5 hours. The higher doses administered (240 mg/kg/day SC) produced
`defense behavior, tremor, twitches, and convulsions in 1 dog. A potential relationship of
`the tremors to possible seizure activity was not addressed. Acute tolerance was
`suggested by observed decreases in severity and duration of the behavioral signs after the
`second than after the first daily doses. Also, the clinical signs were progressively reduced
`in severity over the course of the treatment duration, further suggesting the development
`of partial tolerance to tapentadol CNS effects.
`Injection site inspections indicated that
`the dogs scratched the sites throughout the study. Reduced body weights, body
`temperature and heart rate observed early in the studies showed gradual, slight recovery
`throughout the dosing periods, but body weights remained below control levels at the end
`of the second study. Food consumption, greatly reduced during the first weeks of
`treatment, was also only partially reversed by extension of the feeding periods. The
`results of the ECG measurements showed treatment-related absolute and corrected QT
`prolongation at 30 minutes after dosing compared to baseline values in the dogs given 24
`mg/kg b.i.d during Week 1, and trends toward increased absolute QT values in Weeks 4
`and 13.
`
`’ The necroscopic examination in the 3-month SC toxicity studies in dogs showed local
`toxicity at the injection sites in both studies. The main injection site findings were
`subcutaneous ecchymoses with hemorrhages, edema and gelatinous consistency of
`. underlying tissues, that indicated scratching by the dogs throughout the first study.
`There was considerable local injection site toxicity in the second study that was
`qualitatively similar to the findings in the first SC study, with dark red discoloration,
`hemorrhages, acute and subacute inflammatory infiltrates, fibrosis, phlebitis and
`thrombophlebitis, and at the HD (16 mg/kg/day) chronic focal or multifocal
`perivasculitis. The injection site effects were only partially reversible during the 4—week
`
`308
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22—304
`
`recovery period, and suggested that the SC route is likely not suitable for evaluation of
`chronic tapentadol toxicity in dogs. Tapentadol-related GI toxicity was evident in the
`necropsy in the second study, by findings of hemorrhage in the mesentery, and dark red
`discolorations in the stomach, and small and large intestines. Toxicokinetic analyses
`showed consistent exposure to .the test article and the metabolite tapentadol-O-
`glucuronide, with dose-proportional increases in concentrations, peak plasma
`concentrations at approximately 0.5 h, and considerably higher exposure to the
`metabolite (t1/2 = 4h) than to the parent drug (t1/2 = 1.77 h). Parent drug exposure (AUC)
`was higher in the dog that convulsed than in the other dogs, but there were no differences
`in peak plasma tapentadol concentration (Cmax).
`
`Oral (gavage) tapentadol toxicity was tested in two 2-week, and in 13- and 52-week
`studies in dog. The 2-week studies evaluated doses of 50 and 150 mg/kg/day in the first,
`and in the second study there was a 13-day dose escalation period (10-350 mg/kg/day)
`followed by a dose de-escalation period from 320 down to 200 mg/kg/day for 14 days.
`The clinical signs of tapentadol toxicity were generally similar to those observed in the
`IV and SC assays in the dogs (salivation, vomiting, irregular respiration, and
`recumbency), with observations of whimpering (2220 mg/kg/day), somnolence (2280
`mg/kg/day), dyspnea , tachypnea 0r panting (280 mg/kg/day) and tremors (2160
`' mg/kg/day) beginning approximately 15 minutes after oral dosing and persisting for up to
`8 hours at the higher doses in the second assay. Convulsions were observed in several
`dogs in the first (1 M and 1 F at 50 mg/kg/day, and l M and 1 F at 150 mg/kg/day) and
`second (1F at 350, 320, 280, and occasionally at 200 mg/kg/day) study. ECG and
`hearing measurements were normal in both studies. Liver weights were increased in all
`treated dogs in the second but not in the first study, in the dogs given the dose escalations
`up to 350 mg/kg/day and then de-escalation from 350 to 200 mg/kg/day. Observed
`treatment-related increases in liver weights were without clinical laboratory, and
`macroscopic and microscopic correlates. Treatment-related GI toxicity revealed in the
`necropsies was manifest by activation of the enteric lymphatic system (Peyer’s patches)
`in the small and large intestines with activated lymphoid follicles in the gastric mucosa
`and proximal small intestine suggesting hyperplasia in the germinal centers characteristic
`of gastrointestinal immune response.
`
`The results of 13-week oral tapentadol toxicity observations in Beagle dogs (10-80
`mg/kg/day) were comparable to those in the shorter term (2-week) oral studies and to the
`toxicity found by the IV and SC routes.
`Initial HD administration at 120 mg/kg/day
`produced severe CNS toxicity, beginning 15-30 minutes after dosing and lasting for up to
`5 hours. The signs included tachypnea, apathy and convulsions with paddling
`movements, twitching and tremors, and mortality in 2 M dogs, prompting loWering the
`dose to 80 mg/kg/day on treatment Day 23 until the end of the study. The convulsions
`were observed at 30-60 minutes after tapentadol administration, except for a convulsion
`immediately after dosing in one of the F. Food consumption was reduced .in the M (HD)
`and F (235 mg/kg/day), predominantly during the first several weeks of dosing. Body
`weight gain was reduced at the HD. The treatment-related effects on clinical signs and
`body weights were reversible after the 4-week recovery period.
`
`.309
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`‘
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`ECG assessments in the 13-week oral toxicity study in dogs showed QT prolongation,
`with similar results after correction for heart rate (QTc), at 35 mg/kg/day in Week 13, and
`in the high-dose groups in Weeks 1 (120 mg/kg/day) and 13 (80 mg/kg/day). Treatment—
`related decreased gamma glutamyltransferase and increased serum sodium were found.
`Macroscopic and microscopic examinations during necropsy showed thymic atrophy and
`prostate gland inflammation (235 mg/kg/day) and adrenal cortical hypertrophy in the M
`235 mg/kg/day). Hepatic microsomal enzyme activity analysis in liver samples
`recovered during the necropsy in the HD and control dogs showed a statistically
`significant treatment-related induction of aminopyrine N—demethylase activity in the M
`and F, and inhibition of glucuronyltransferase activity in the M. The NOAEL in this
`study (10 mg/kg/day) represented systemic exposure to the parent drug of approximately
`0.04 times the-clinical exposure at the MRHD of 600 mg/kg/day on an AUC basis, and on
`a Cmax basis, relevant to the CNS and cardiovascular effects noted during the study.
`Plasma O-glucuronide metabolite was not assessed.
`
`The chronic (52-week) oral (gavage) study in M and F Beagle dogs given tapentadol once
`daily (10-80 mg/kg/day) confirmed the target organs toxicity seen in the shorter term oral
`and injection (IV and SC) studies in dog, in the CNS and cardiovascular system. One HD
`F was euthanized in extremis on dosing Day 12 due to convulsions on several days
`observed within 30 minutes after dosing. There were no necroscopic abnormalities in
`this dog. Convulsions were also seen in another HD F on multiple days throughout the
`dosing period up to Day 358, starting at 20-30 minutes after dosing and lasting for up to 5
`hours. The convulsions were associated with paddling movements, muscle twitching,
`recumbency, tremor, labored breathing, and decreased activity, and were reversed with
`naloxone. ,No convulsions were observed during the recovery period. There were also
`treatment-related clinical signs consistent with tapentadol mu—opioid receptor agonist
`effects in the dog studies, including salivation, decreased activity, recumbency, vomiting,
`tremor, and occasional whimpering, and fearfulness, beginning at 15-30 minutes after
`dosing, and lasting for up to 5 hours. Reductions in food consumption (F at 230
`mg/kg/day) and body weights (BB) were observed during the first several weeks of
`dosing.
`
`ECG assessments in the chronic dog study revealed slight but statistically significant
`prolongation of the QT and corrected QT (Van de Water’s and Fridericia’s corrections)
`intervals in the 1 hour post—dose recordings in most of the HD dogs compared to baseline
`and control values throughout the treatment period. There were no other treatment—
`related ECG effects during the dosing period, and no ECG findings during the recovery
`period. Slight, minimal, treatment-related decreased partial thromboplastin time (PTT)
`values were found in the HD dogs, which-were not reversible during the 4-week recovery
`period. The necropsy results were negative in the standard evaluations. However,
`special examination of brain showed minimal to slight focal gliosis with perivascular
`mononuclear cell infiltration in the medulla oblongata and/or pons in 2 M and F at 30
`mg/kg/day, and in 1 HD F, with no correlation to seizure incidence, and are considered to
`be spontaneous, in agreement with the Sponsor. In the liver enzyme activity analysis, no
`tapentadol effects on cytochrome P450 content were found, but there were dose-related
`increases in O-deethylase activity in the F, and dose-related increases in N-demethylase‘
`
`310
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`activity in the M and F. Also, 2-aminophenol glucuronyltransferase activity was
`decreased in the M and F dogs. The NOAEL in the 52-week toxicity study in dogs (10
`mg/kg/day) represented systemic exposure to the parent drug that of approximately 0.05
`times the exposure at the clinical maximum recommended human dose (MRI-ID) of 600
`mg/day in a 70 kg patient, on an AUC basis, and 0.06 times on a Cmax basis, relevant to
`CNS and CV observations. The systemic exposure to the O-glucuronide metabolite at the
`NOAEL (10 mg/kg/day) in this study represented approximately 1.7X the clinical
`exposure at the MRHD. The exposure to the parent drug and metabolite at the NOEL for
`convulsions in this study represented approximately 0.4 and 5.2 times the clinical
`exposures to the parent drug and metabolite, respectively, at the MRI-ID on an AUC
`basis.
`.
`
`In summary, the main target organs of tapentadol toxicity in the repeated dose studies in
`dogs, most of which were commonly observed using several routes and durations of
`treatment, were the central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular system (CV),
`gastrointestinal system (GI) and local toxicity in the intravenous and subcutaneous
`toxicity studies. The CNS clinical signs were similar in all of the studies across dose
`ranges given, and included salivation, restlessness, recumbency, decreased activity,
`rhinorrhea, panting, labored breathing, and tachypnea. In the bid. study in the dogs
`given twice daily subcutaneous (SC) tapentadol injections for 3 months, the signs were
`more severe after the first than after the second daily dose, suggesting development of
`short term tolerance, a know/n phenomena with mu-opioid receptor agonist treatment.
`Also, the severity of the clinical signs decreased with increasing duration of treatment
`within several of the studies, further suggesting tolerance to opioid-induced behavioral
`effects. Most notable of the clinical signs were convulsions, observed in M and/or F dogs
`treated by SC injection for 3 months at 240 mg/kg/day (NOEL = 20 mg/kg/day SC), and
`by oral gavage at 250 mg/kg/day (NOEL = not determined) and 2200 mg/kg/day (NOEL
`= 160 mg/kg) for 2 weeks, at 120 mg/kg/day for 13 weeks (NOEL = 80 mg/kg/day), and
`at 80 mg/kg/day for 52 weeks (NOEL = 30 mg/kg/day). No convulsions were observed
`in IV treated dogs at up to 7.5 mg/kg/day for up to 4 weeks duration. The convulsions
`were accompanied by paddling movements, tremors, and twitching. A possible
`relationship of the tremors observed in several studies in dogs to seizure activity was not
`investigated. There was no tolerance development to the treatment—related convulsant
`'
`1 effect in the dogs. Although mOSt of the dogs that convulsed either were sacrificed in
`extremis or received dose reductions following the seizures, a F given 80 mg/kg/day by
`oral gavage for 52 weeks showed convulsions on multiple days up to day 358 of dosing.
`
`Tapentadol-related cardiovascular effects in the Beagle dog were indicated by QT
`prolongation in the ECG measurements across studies, at 28 mg/kg/day SC for 3 months
`(NOEL 4 mg/kg/day) particularly during the first week of treatment, at 235 mg/kg/day
`(Week 13) and 120 mg/kg/day (Week 1) in the 13-week gavage study (NOEL 10
`mg/kg/day) and at 80 mg/kg/day in the 52-week oral gavage study (NOEL 30
`mg/kg/day). No other ECG effects were found in the studies in dog. QT prolongation is
`probably associated with norepinephrine reuptake inhibition by tapentadol.
`
`3ll
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`Treatment-related GI toxicity was observed in dogs given tapentadol by several routes.
`Dogs administered SC tapentadol injections in the 3-month study showed reversible
`hemorrhage in the mesentery, and dark red discolorations in the stomach, small and large
`intestines at all doses (24 mg/kg/day). The necroscopic examinations in several oral
`gavage studies revealed activated lymphoid follicles in the gastric mucosa and small
`intestines in the 2-week oral gavage study (250 mg/kg/day), that were attributed to GI
`immune response by the examining pathologist. Local tissue toxicity was found in dogs
`given IV and SC injections, and included red foci at the highest dose of 7.5 mg/kg/day in
`the 4-week IV study, and injection site hemorrhage and fibrosis, with scratching of the
`site by the dogs throughout the dosing periods in both 3-month SC studies (220
`mg/kg/day in one and 24 mg/kg/day in the second study).
`
`Monkey:
`
`Two-week pilot studies were conducted in Cynomolgus monkeys to evaluate
`toxicokinetics and compare toxicity of tapentadol given by repeated IV (5 mg/kg/day)
`and oral (15 mg/kg/day) administration. No necroscopic examinations were performed
`in this study. There was occasional, slight sedation noted after the intravenous infusions,
`but no other clinical signs, no effects on body weights and food consumption, and no
`local toxicity was found upon examination of the injection sites. The results of the
`toxicokinetic evaluation showed extremely low oral bioavailability (<l%) suggesting
`extensive first-pass metabolism, and a short half life (1h by IV), with no accumulation
`using either route over the 14-day period.
`
`Overall Repeated Dose Toxicology Summary:
`
`There were interspecies differences and similarities in target organ toxicity between the
`mouse, rat and dog. In the rat, the predominant treatment-related effect, after CNS
`clinical signs, was in the liver, evident by increased liver enzymes (e.g., ALAT, ASAT,
`ALP, etc) and increased liver weights, hepatocellular hypertrophy with fatty change at
`higher doses and longer durations, and hepatocellular necrosis. Hepatotoxicity was also a
`main treatment effect in mice, which showed increased liver enzymes in the clinical
`laboratory analyses and increased liver weights in the 2- and 13-week dietary studies and
`in the 13-week gavage study, and hepatocellular hypertrophy with group cell necrosis in
`the 13-week dietary study at high doses of 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day, in the males and
`females. In the dog, there were more severe CNS toxicity that included convulsions, and
`CV toxicity with treatment-related QT‘ prolongation. Clinical signs were not evident in
`the dietary and gavage studies in mice, at up to high doses of 1000 mg/kg/day dietary for
`13 weeks and 200 mg/kg/day by gavage for 13 weeks. Target organ similarities between
`rat and dog were in the CNS clinical signs, such as sedation, decreased body weights and
`food consumption in both species with tolerance development to these signs. Also, GI
`'_
`toxicity was found in rat and dog, but not in the mouse, and included red foci in stomach .
`in the 4-week IV study in rat, and duodenal dilation at the highest dietary dose of 1000
`mg/kg/day in rat. In the dog, gastrointestinal hemorrhages and activated lymphoid
`follicles in the gastric mucosa and small intestine were predominant. Local injection site
`toxicity was found in both rat and dog. These effects included infusion site swelling,
`
`312
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`particularly by the SC route in rat, and red foci after IV infusion, and hemorrhage and
`fibrosis after SC injections in the dog. The results in both species snowed greater local.
`toxicity by SC than by IV dosing.
`
`Most of the treatment-related toxicity, the clinical signs including convulsions, QT
`prolongation, and toxicity in the gastrointestinal system were reversible in the studies that
`used recovery period evaluations. However, injection site findings, such as hemorrhages,
`inflammatory infiltrates, fibrosis, phlebitis and thrombophlebitis afier SC dosing in the 3-
`month study were only partially reversible at 4-weeks following drug withdrawal.
`
`The results of the nonclinical toxicology studies suggest potential adverse effects in
`clinical treatment by mu—opioid receptor binding and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition.
`The main treatment-related target organs of toxicity, including the liver in rat, CNS in rat
`and dog, and cardiovascular system (QT prolongation) in dog, suggest careful screening a
`and monitoring patients with existing hepatic disease, seizure disorders and
`cardiovascular conditions. Most of the treatment-related toxicity observed in the
`nonclinical studies, such as CNS depression and hepatic changes reversible after
`withdrawal of treatment. These adverse effects are also monitorable to some extent, such.
`as by periodic clinical laboratory assessments during clinical treatment. However,
`unexpected or severe CNS and cardiovascular toxicity may not be as easily monitored in
`an outpatient setting. Therefore, aW
`M. discussed with the patients during treatment.
`
`Genetic Toxicology
`
`Tapentadol HCl was evaluated by the Sponsor in a standard, battery of genetic toxicity
`studies. The studies included in vitro assays in Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia
`coli (Ames Test, Reverse Mutation Assay, using both the plate incorporation test in
`Experiment I and pre-‘incubation test in Experiment II), and two independent
`Chromosome Aberrations Assays in Chinese Hamster V79 cells. Additionally,
`tapentadol was tested in the Chromosome Aberration Assay in rat bone marrow cells in
`vivo, and the Unscheduled DNA Synthesis assay in rat hepatocytes ex vivo.
`
`Tapentadol was clastogenic in the first of two independent in vitro Chromosome
`Aberration studies in Chinese hamster V79 cells, resulting in a statistically significant
`increase in the incidence of structural chromosome aberrations at concentrations greater
`than 1000 meg/ml in the presence of S9 mix. A second study, conducted to further
`explore the results of the positive findings in the Chromosome Aberration assay in V79
`cells, revealed no increases in the frequencies of cells with aberrations at concentrations
`of up to the maximum concentration tested (1500 meg/ml for 4 hours without metabolic
`activation with S9, and up to 1000 mcg/ml for 4 hours and 300 mcg/ml for 18 and 28
`hours exposure with S9 mix).
`
`No evidence was found of mutagenic potential‘by tapentadol in Salmonella typhimurium
`strains TA1537, TA 98, TA 1535, and TAlOO, and in Escherichia coli strain WP2: trp;
`uvrA in the Ames test using the plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`concentrations of up to 5000 meg/plate. Tapentadol was also negative in the in vivo
`assay for clastogenicity in male and female Wistar rat bone marrow cells at doses of up to
`the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 40 mg/kg IV evaluated at 24 and 48 hours.
`Evaluation of potential mutagenicity in the hepatocytes of rats given up to 35 mg/kg IV
`and 350 mg/kg PO (gavage) tapentadol in the Unscheduled DNA Synthesis assay
`revealed no increased DNA repair synthesis induced indicative of treatment-related DNA
`damage and subsequent repair.
`
`In conclusion, tapentadol was equivocal in the in vitro Chromosome Aberrations assay in
`Chinese hamster V79 cells, in the presence of metabolic activation with S9. The findings
`, suggest potential clastogenicity by a metabolite of tapentadol HCl in the rat, from which
`the metabolic activating system ($9 mix) was obtained. The identity and production by
`human metabolism of the potentially genotoxic metabolite is not known.
`
`Carcinogenicity
`
`Tapentadol was negative for carcinogenicity in 104-week studies in male and female
`mice and rats. Male and female CD-1 mice were administered tapentadol by oral gavage
`at doses of 50—200 mg/kg/day for 2 years. The Sponsor reported a statistically
`significant treatment-related increase in hepatocellular carcinomas in the HD male mice
`that was found not statistically significant by Agency statistical analyses for this common
`tumor type in mice. Agency analyses found positive trends toward increased
`hepatocellular adenomas in the female mice, and a statistically significant dose response
`for liver adenoma + carcinoma in the male mice without statistically significant
`differences in the pairwise comparisons with controls. There were statistically significant
`trends for subcutis sarcoma in male mice, and ovarian benign granulosa cell and luteoma
`tumors in the female mice, also without statistically significant treatment-related
`increases in the pairwise comparisons. Historical control data suggested that the tumor
`incidences are within the background for the strain in this laboratory. The NOEL for
`carcinogenicity by tapentadol at the highest dose tested in mice represents approximately
`1.4 times the clinical exposure to the parent drug at the maximum recommended human
`dose (MRHD), and approximately 8.4 times the exposure to the glucuronide metabolite at
`the MRHD, on an AUC basis.
`-
`
`Male and female Wistar rats were administered oral tapentadol by admixture in the diet,
`at daily doses of 10-250 mg/kg/day for 104 weeks. The results of the histopathology
`evaluation showed slight non—statistically significant (compared to controls) increases in
`the incidence of hepatocellular adenomas in the high dose females and one additional
`hepatocellular carcinoma in the high dose male rats. Agency statistical analyses detected
`positive trends in the incidence in female rats in liver hepatocellular adenoma. There was
`a statistically significant dose response for increased liver adenomas + carcinomas in the
`female rats, but no statistically significant increases over controls in any treated group.
`There was a positive trend for increased incidence of thymic lymphoma, but not for
`lymphomas at all sites, combined. Historical control data suggested that the tumor
`incidences in the rats are within the background for the strain in this laboratory.
`
`314
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`Evaluation of non-neoplastic lesions in the rats showed a minimal but statistically
`significant treatment-related increase in centrilobular hepatocellular hypertrophy in the
`male and female rats. The histopathology findings in the liver are likely related to
`chronic, adaptive response associated with treatment-related increased metabolic enzyme
`activities. Increased follicular cell hypertrophy and focal follicular hyperplasia in the
`thyroid was observed in the HD females, probably resulting from chronic, enhanced liver
`enzyme activities and hypertrophy, in agreement with the Sponsor. The changes in
`thyroid in the females is probably not due to induction of thyroxine UDP
`glucuronosyltransferase activity by tapentadol, because assessments of hepatic
`microsomal enzyme induction and inhibition studies in liver microsomes isolated during
`necropsy in several studies in rats and dogs were negative for this effect. Thyroxine '
`UDP glucuronosyltransferase may be involved in thyroid tumor formation by non-
`‘genotoxic CYP enzyme induction, via stimulation of thyroxine glucuronidation and
`biliary excretion, resulting in decreased serum thyroxine and triiodothyronine, with
`increased serum thyroid stimulating hormone, which during chronic stimulation results in
`thyroid follicular cell hyperplasia that may progress to follicular cell tumors. The NOEL
`values for carcinogenicity produced by tapentadol at the highest dose tested in rats are
`approximately 0.7 times in the males and 2.7 times in the females the clinical exposure to
`the parent drug at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD, 600 mg/day) and
`approximately 27 times in the male and female rats the clinical exposure to the
`glucuronide metabolite at the MRHD, on an AUC basis.
`
`Reproductive and developmental toxicology
`
`Tapentadol reproductive and developmental effects were investigated in rats and rabbits.
`Dose selection for the main studies was based on maximum tolerated dese (MTD) levels
`in the preliminary range-finding toxicity studies in pregnant and non-pregnant animals
`using oral gavage, and injections by the IV and SC routes. The animals were dosed by
`IV and SC injections in the main reproductive toxicology studies to maximize systemic
`exposure to the parent drug, due to the rapid and extensive first-pass metabolism by the
`oral route in these species.
`'
`
`Tapentadol was negative for adverse effects on mating and fertility at intravenous (IV)
`doses of up to the MTD in male and female Wistar rats. There were embryonic
`developmental abnormalities (pre—implantation and post-implantation losses), considered
`to be secondary to maternal toxicity, in agreement with the Sponsor. The NOEL values
`were 3 mg/kg/d for maternal toxicity, and 12 mg/kg/d for adverse effects on fertility in
`the male and female rats. The systemic exposure at the NOEL for adverse fertility effects
`represented approximately 0.41 times in the male and 0.35 times in the female rats the
`MRHD, on an AUC basis, based on plasma sampling in another IV study in rats.
`
`Embryo-fetal development toxicity by tapentadol was studied in rats and rabbits.
`Tapentadol was negative for teratogenicity in the rats at up to maternally toxic
`intravenous and subcutaneous doses. However, there was a treatment-related increase the
`incidence and severity of fetal variations and malformations in rabbits given
`subcutaneous tapentadol, but not when dosed by the intravenous route.
`
`~
`
`315
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`In an IV study on developmental toxicity, pregnant Sprague Dawley rats were
`administered tapentadol a doses of 3—1 5 mg/kg/day (gestation days 6-17, inclusive).
`There were 2 maternal deaths each at 7 and 15 mg/kg/day, within 2-45 minutes of the
`first injection, preceded by convulsions, exophthalmus, flaccid position and hemorrhagic
`snout. Although there were reduced numbers of fetuses and implantation sites and
`increased late resorptions, correlating with the observed maternal toxicity (decreased
`maternal body Weights and severe maternal clinical signs), there were no treatment-
`related effects on sex distribution, placenta weight, fetal weight, fetal deaths, incidence of
`runts, and no external, skeletal and soft tissue malformations, variations and retardations.
`Subsequent investigation of adverse effects on embryofetal development by SC
`tapentadol (10-40 mg/kg/day on Gestation days 6-17, inclusive) showed maternal toxicity
`at all dose levels, with dose—related increases in severity and duration of reduced body
`weight gain, abdominal position lasting 1—2 hours, and'local toxicity (eschar formation
`and hemorrhagic foci) at 220 mg/kg/day. No treatment-related malformations or
`variations were observed in this study. However, tapentadol was embryotoxic at the HD
`(approximately 3 times the systemic clinical exposure at the MRI-ID on an AUC basis),
`produc

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket