throbber
Reviewer: Kathleen Young, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`HismficawommauonNeoplasficPhangsf '
`
`( Wis:fium2-YearBioassays (Planned5mm Schedule: >103 Weeks)
`
`hm)
`
`Liver and Common Bile Duct
`
`I?»
`z;
`_Ember cirn “mud
`I
`\
`.
`
`U.)llU)*‘I
`
`U
`
`I\
`
`559110annodal:
`
`'
`
`Manama: nxima
`
`Lymyhnm: mfilmn
`
`Cum 31!: Ban
`Kuhn 051:? um“
`
`APPEARS THIS WM
`0% GWGWAL
`
`222
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, PhD.
`
`,
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`Hisimical Comm] Data onNeopIasfi: Finding; ‘
`
`_,
`(
`
`J,,.
`W‘Wist fiom 2-Yea'3ioasszys (flamed Sauifice Schedule: >103 W’aeks)
`
`W“
`
`Thymus
`lfil
`1'
`
`W
`
`._.
`
`:
`
`O
`
`r-Iv—n
`O
`
`.oo.c
`
`tarmac-a)
`
`C T
`
`573“:-
`iEa i‘
`aEE E
`
`.
`
`lgglllllllll33‘-3N8-
`‘5‘]#0HU-Wl)¢nma‘
`
`O 8u.Elgaggfigglalml
`
`
`r:88
` fl;b-nw-to~1’Hmluv—awvr
`
`lglgglgggll
`
`
`pI.)._.
`
`
`m4
`_ ‘-
`
`——
`
`Thymus: lymphocyi:hmigu
`
`r.
`
`rum
`
`
`
`Toxicokinetics:
`
`Greater than dose-related increase in systemic exposure to test article in F at 10 to
`125 mg/kg/day
`'
`'
`Linear dose-related increase in exposure (AUC0_24) to the parent drug in the M
`Dose-proportional increase in systemic glucuronide metabolite exposure, without
`gender differences
`Exposure to parent drug, CG5 503 but not to the glucuronide metabolite was
`higher in the F than in the M
`.
`a
`.
`High intra-group variability in the TK parameters (note large Standard Deviations
`observed) may be a result of variable feeding due to the housing arrangement
`using 5 rats/cage, with possible inconsistent access to food within the caged
`groups
`
`The results of the TK evaluation on CGSSO3 and CG5503 glucuronide are
`presented in the following tables (provided from the original NDA submission):
`
`223
`
`€
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young; Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`Summary on exposure to CG5503 base in Wistar rats after daily oral doses of CG5503 in the
`diet for at least 104 weeks
`
`(mean values AUCQLM.) :1: SD. of week 4, week 13 and week 26)
`
`lmg/kgida)‘l
`
`Week 13
`
`i211
`
`131
`1:66
`
`284
`2169
`
`560
`i253
`
`12.5
`16.2
`
`136
`$96
`
`384
`3:159
`
`1079
`i738
`
`2688
`994
`207
`18.8
`485
`331
`118
`18.0
`
`
`3:30$4.6 i2719 i175 i234 $8.7 3:112 i537
`
`
`
`
`
`Week 26
`
`Weeks
`4 to 26
`
`19.1
`:9.5
`
`94
`:65
`
`274
`i165
`
`19.7
`i8]
`87.2
`
`115
`:36
`71.8
`
`296
`i125
`96.5
`
`328
`3:138
`
`.
`
`458
`i205
`58.6
`
`16.5
`$7.7
`
`156
`:56
`
`620
`i363
`
`1349
`1:138]
`
`15.9
`i4.6
`
`166
`$50
`
`666
`$351
`
`1705
`11495
`
`R“ = ratio ofADC from week '26 to‘ week 4
`
`Summary on exposure to CG5503 glueuronide in Wistar rats after daily oral doses of CG5503
`in the diet for at least 104 weeks
`
`.(mean values Cm; and AUQMM i SD. of week 4, week 13 and week 26)
`Males
`Females
`
`Dose
`Week 4
`
`[mg/kg/day]
`
`
`
`
`18630
`$4778
`
`88881
`122176
`
`221058
`21:49522
`
`428530
`:167827
`
`15750
`14419
`
`80647
`$20367
`
`396595
`213118
`$8960 212181995
`
`21977
`i1877
`
`94668
`£20658
`
`249068
`21266631
`
`462639
`398040
`
`19312
`i6475
`
`104501
`$24954
`
`495182
`263560
`i51050 212158659
`
`19534
`:6919
`
`277884
`102417
`£29299 =111166
`
`475181
`2181040
`
`16881
`$44122
`
`98980
`$32854
`
`436231
`285241
`21:95222 $150146
`
`[ugh/ml]
`
`20047
`$4563
`
`95322
`i17707
`
`249337
`271028
`
`455450
`$111894
`
`17315
`$3904
`
`94709
`$18638
`
`442669
`253973
`$64122 $132524
`
`126
`
`111
`
`10?
`
`123
`
`134'
`
`R13: ratio of AUC from week 26 to week 4 ~
`
`224
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`3.4.6. Reproductive and developmental toxicology
`
`Summagy: The potential for reproductive and developmental toxicity by tapentadol was
`evaluated in rats and rabbits. Dose selection for the main studies was based on the results
`
`of preliminary range—finding toxicity studies, conducted in pregnant or non-pregnant
`animals; The range-finding studies included assays on tapentadol given by oral gavage,
`intravenous injection, and subcutaneous injection. Pivotal reproductive toxicology
`studies were conducted by the intravenous and subcutaneous routes to maximize systemic
`exposure to the parent drug, because oral tapentadol undergoes rapid and nearly complete
`transformation, predominantly to the O-glucuronide metabolite. An additional
`preliminary study in maternal and juvenile rats given tapentadol by oral gavage was
`conducted for dose selection in the pre- and post-natal development study in maternal and
`juvenile rats. Dose range-finding studies were conducted in non—pregnant rabbits
`7
`administered tapentadol by intravenous and subcutaneous injections.
`
`The results of the oral dose range-finding study in pregnant Sprague Dawley rats (Study
`TP2767) showed maternal hypersalivation at both doses administered (300 and 400
`mg/kg/day), and reduced maternal body weight gains of -24% at 300 and —23% at 400
`mg/kg/day throughout the dosing period. There were no treatment—related effects on the
`macroscopic examination of the dams, the numbers of implantations and dead and live
`fetuses. Oral dose range—finding investigation in another study conducted for dose-
`selection in the pre- and post-natal development andjuvenile study in rats (oral doses 0,
`20, 75, and 150 mg/kg b.i.d. PO, Study TP2772) showed reduced maternal body weight
`gains and food consumption (dose-related) and F1 generation toXicity via transfer in milk
`through postnatal day (PND) 8, and by direct treatment of the pups in PND 13-26 at all
`doses. F1 toxicity included HD pup deaths in the first 4 PNDs, reduced pup body weight
`gains in female pups during lactation (up to PND 8) and in the male and female pups
`dosed directly via gavage at the HD (PND 13-26). Clinical signs observed in the pups
`included hypoactivity at the MD and HD, and sedation and coldness at the HD before
`reduction of the HD from 150 to 100 mg/kg/day.
`
`The results of the intravenous dose range—finding study in rats (Study TP2060) showed
`decreased maternal body weights at the high dose (15 mg/kg/day), and maternal deaths at
`the 7 and 15 mg/kg/day doses (2/20 rats in each group), with tonic or clonic convulsions,
`flaccid position, and hemorrhagic snout in a high dose dam. Reduced numbers of fetuses,
`implantation sites and increased late resorptions were attributed to maternal toxicity, in
`agreement with the Sponsor. No evidence of teratogenicity by tapentadol was found in
`the fetal examinations in this range-finding study.
`
`injection in pregnant rats for 2 weeks (Study TP2465) produced
`Subcutaneous tapentadol
`injection site discoloration and erythemas at the MD of 30 mg/kg/day given in divided
`doses (bid) and HD of 50 mg/kg/day (divided, b.i.d.), and weeping eroded hemorrhagic
`lesions, eschar formation, and injection site indurations at theHD in most of the dams.
`Food consumption was reduced in a dose—related manner at the MD and HD, and reduced
`motility was observed at the HD.
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`The results of the dose range-finding study in non-pregnant Himalayan rabbits
`administered tapentadol by intravenous injection at doses of 0,. 3, 7, and 15 mg/kg/day for
`2 weeks (Study TP2061) showed reduced dose-related increases in severity and duration
`of motility and flaccid position at all dose levels. Opisthotonus, increased respiratory
`rate, and reduced food consumption and body weights were observed at the MD and HD,
`and reduced respiratory volume and exophthalmus was found at the HD. Dose range—
`finding evaluation was also performed in non-pregnant rabbits by the subcutaneous route,
`at doses of 0, 10, 30 and 50 mg/kg/day (divided, b.i.d.) for 14 consecutive days (Study
`TP2464). Local toxicity was observed, similar to that in the subcutaneous toxicity study
`in the rats, at the high dose and included red or brown discoloration at the injection sites
`with subcutaneous lesions and skin thickening. Miosis and dose-related reduced food
`consumption was observed at all doses, and body weights were reduced (-18%) at the
`HD. The clinical signs also included reduced motility and abdominal position at the
`highest dose administered. The necroscopic examination in that study revealed pale liver
`and urinary bladder gritty substance at the high dose.
`
`In the main study on potential treatment—related adverse effects on fertility and early
`embryonic development to implantation in male (M) and female (F) Wistar rats,
`'
`tapentadol was negative for adverse effects on mating and fertility at intravenOUS (IV)
`doses of up to the maximum tolerated (MTD based on toxicity, Study TP2445). The
`maternal (F0) rats were administered consecutive daily IV doses of 0 (saline vehicle
`control), 3, 6, and 12 mg/kg/day, from 28 days before mating through 9 days after mating
`in the M, and from 14 days before mating through Day 6 post-coitum in the F. The key
`study findings in the pivotal fertility study were maternal and early embryonic (F1
`generation) toxicity. Maternal toxicity was indicated by slight body weight loss and
`decreased food consumption at 6 and 12 mg/kg/day IV tapentadol. The mean numbers of
`corpora lutea were reduced by 4% and 6%, and there were decreased mean numbers of
`implantations by 8% and 11% at those doses, respectively. Additionally, there were dose
`related increases in mean percent pre-implantation and post-implantation losses, and
`dose-related decreased mean numbers of live conceptuses at all doses, compared to
`controls. No adverse treatment-related effects on mating performance and in the
`necroscopic examination ofthe reproductive organs were observed in the 4M rats. The
`embryonic developmental abnormalities (pre—implantation and post-implantation losses)
`are considered to be secondary to maternal toxicity, in agreement with the Sponsor. The
`NOAEL value for F0 toxicity was 3 mg/kg/day IV, for adverse effects on fertility in the
`F0 M and F rats was 12 mg/kg/day IV and for adverse effects on early embryonic
`development (F 1 generation) was 3 mg/kg/day IV. Toxicokinetics analyses were not
`conducted in this study; estimated systemicexposures based on the toxicokinetics
`analyses in a 4-week intravenous study in rats (PT1966) at the highest IV dose of 15
`mg/kg/day represented approximately 0.41 times in the M and 0.35 times in the F rats,
`the MRHD, on an AUC basis.
`
`Embryo-fetal development toxicity (Segment II studies) was studied in rats and rabbits
`administered tapentadol by intravenous and subcutaneous administration. Tapentadol
`was negative for teratogenicity in rats at up to maternally toxic doses, but found to
`
`226
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`increase the incidence and severity of fetal variations and malformations in the rabbit
`studies.
`
`Pregnant Sprague Dawley rats were given tapentadol by intravenous injection at doses of
`0, 3 (LD), 7 (MD), and 15 (HD) mg/kg/day on gestation days 6-17 (inclusive, Study
`TP2060). There were 2 maternal deaths each in the MD and HD groups, within 2-45
`minutes of the first injection, preceded by convulsions, exophthalmus, flaccid position
`and hemorrhagic snout. There were reduced numbers of fetuses, decreased implantation
`sites and increased late resorptions that correlated with decreased maternal body weights
`and severe maternal clinical signs. There were no treatment-related effects on sex
`.
`distribution, placenta weight, fetal weight, fetal deaths, incidence of runts, and no
`external, skeletal and soft tissue malformations, variations and retardations. Subsequent
`investigation of embryotoxicity by tapentadol in using the subcutaneous route (Study
`TP2510) at doses of 0, 5 (LD), 10 (MD), and 20 (HD) mg/kg bid. (10, 20, and 40
`mg/kg/day) on Gestation days 6-17 (inclusive) showed maternal toxicity at all dose
`levels, with dose-related increases in severity and duration of reduced body weight gain,
`abdominal position lasting 1-2 hours, and at the MD and HD local toxicity (eschar
`formation and hemorrhagic foci). No treatment-related malformations or variations were
`observed in this study. However, tapentadol was embryotoxic at the HD (representing
`systemic exposure of approximately 3 times the clinical systemic exposure at the MRHD,
`on an AUC basis). There were observations indicative of treatment-related
`developmental delay (skeletal retardation), with increased incidence of incomplete or
`missing ossification of the stemebra and caudal vertebral bodies when compared to
`control fetuses. A relationship of the observed embryotoxicity to maternal toxicity,
`particularly to treatment-related reduced food consumption and body weight gain is
`likely. The NOAEL for embryotoxicity was 20 mg/kg/day (representing systemic
`exposure of approximately 1.5 times the clinical systemic exposure at the MRHD, on an
`AUC basis). Exposure to the O-glucuronide metabolite at the highest dose tested was
`approximately equivalent to clinical exposure to the metabolite at the MRHD, on an AUC
`basis.
`
`An early embryo-fetal toxicity study in Himalayan rabbits (Study TP2061) evaluated
`intravenous doses of O, 1 (LD), 3 (MD), and 9 (HD) mg/kg/day from Gestation Days 6-
`20, inclusive (Study TP2062). Maternal toxicity, noted at the HD, included flaccid
`position, increased respiratory rate, opisthotonus and tremor. There was one abortion at
`the HD on Gestation Day 26 (within range of historical background incidence). This
`study was negative for external, visceral and skeletal malformations, variations and
`retardations by IV tapentadol administration, although there was a treatment-related
`decrease in number of live fetuses and increased post-implantation loss at the HD, due to
`the deaths of 10 fetuses in 2 of the 16 litters evaluated. Toxicokinetic evaluation results
`
`were not provided.
`
`A second embryo-fetal development study on tapentadol was conducted in Himilayan
`rabbits, dosed twice daily by the subcutaneous route at doses of 0, 4 (LD), 10 (MD), and
`24 (HD) mg/kg/day (Study TP251 1). There were dose-related increases in incidence and
`severity of maternal toxicity, indicated by miosis, abdominal position and reduced body
`
`227
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`weight gain and food consumption at all doses administered. Statistically significant
`reductions in fetal body weights were found at the MD (~10%) and HD (~13%). The
`fetal examinations also revealed dose-related decreases in fetal viability, with increased
`post-Caesarian deaths during the 24-hour incubator stay at he MD (9'fetal deaths) and
`HD (7 fetal deaths), when compared to the control and LD groups (3 deaths each).
`There were 4 runts at the HD (compared to 2 in the control group),_all of which died
`during the 24 hour post-Caesarian incubator stay. Increased incidence of multiple
`internal malformations, with gastroschisis or thoracogastroschisis, prolapsed organs,
`. amelia, and phocomeliawere observed at the MD (+0.9% incidence compared to
`controls) and HD (+1.7% incidence compared to controls). Encephalocele was seen in 1
`HD runt, spina bifida in 1 HD‘runt, kyphosis in 1 HD runt, ablepharia in 3 HD‘fetuses
`from 1 litter, and cleft palate in 1 MD fetus (0.9%), 3 fetuses from 1 HD litter and 1
`additional fetus from another HD litter (3.4%). Skeletal variations (accessory 13th rib,
`shortened ribs, caudal vertebral bodies misaligned or fused, unossified parietal area of the
`skull and sternum fused or misaligned), and skeletal retardations (incomplete ossification
`in the frontal, parietal, interparietal, and supraoccipital skull, unossified hyoid,
`incomplete or unossified small sternum, and reduced, unossified or dumbbell-shaped
`vertebral bodies) were found with statistically significant increases at the HD compared
`to control incidence. The NOAEL for teratogenicity in this study was 4 mg/kg/d SC,
`representing exposures in the dams that were approximately equivalent to the clinical
`systemic exposure at the MRHD ,on an AUC basis. The embryo-fetal toxicity was
`observed in the litters from dams showing severe clinical signs, body weight loss, and
`reduced body weight gain and food consumption, although not all dams showing toxicity
`had adversely affected fetuses. A possible relationship of the observed fetal toxicity to
`maternal toxicity, along with the incidence Of these findings within the upper limit of the
`historical range of background incidence for the' performing laboratory suggest that the
`findings in this study may not be entirely related to direct effect of tapentadol-on embryo-
`fetal development in rabbits, although a direct treatment-related teratogenic effect cannot
`be ruled out, either.
`
`Pre— and post-natal developmental toxicity by tapentadol was investigated in Sprague-
`Dawley rats at maternal (F0 generation) oral gavage doses of 0, 10 (LD), 25 (LMD),
`75(HMD), and 150 (HD) mg/kg b.i.d. (20, 50, 150, and 300 mg/kg/day) administered
`from Gestation Day (GD) 6 through Post-Partum Day (PPD) 21, inclusive. Maternal
`toxiCity was indicated by deaths (4 HD dams found dead and the remaining maternal
`deaths by sacrifice in extremis) in 6 HD, 1 HMD, l LMD, and 2 LD dams, and clinical
`signs of ptyalism (HD), piloerection and round back (HD, HMD), reduced body weight
`and body weight gain (BWG, -22% at the HMD and -24% at the HD), and reduced food
`consumption at the HMD and HD throughout the dosing period. There were no
`treatment-related effects on pregnancy and parturition. There was a statistically
`significant treatment-related reduction in the viability index indicating increased pup
`mortality, with complete litter deaths in l HMD litter and 2 HD litters, and increased
`numbers of pup deaths at the HMD (16 pups) and HD (18 pups) compared to 2 control
`pup deaths. Statistically significant reduction in pup body weights and body weight gains
`were also observed at the HD from PPDl throughout lactation. Unossified 6th centrum of
`the cervical vertebrae was noted in 50% of theHD pups that were found dead during PPD
`
`228
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`l-4, and there were non-ossified or incomplete ossification in other bones in several pups,
`probably due to lower body weights in these pups.
`'
`
`Pup (F 1 generation) post-weaning physical development measurements shoWed reduced
`body weights and body weight gains in the F1 HD M from PPD22 to the end of the study
`(pup ages 10—11 weeks), and in the MD (PPD22-37) and HD (PPD22-ages 10-11 weeks)
`F compared to controls. There were slight, but not significant increases in horizontal
`movements and rearing at the MD and HD in the M (+7% and +10%, respectively) and F
`at all dose levels (+2%-+20%). The results of the T-maze test on the F1 generation
`showed slight, but not significant increases in test time in the learning phase in M at the
`HMD (+63%) and HD (+52%), and in the memory phase at the HD (+12%), compared to
`controls. No treatment-related effects on F1 generation sexual development, auditory
`function and pupil constriction were found. Specifically, there were no treatment-related
`effects on F mating, mean numbers of days to mate, fertility data pregnancy status,
`hysterectomy data (e.g., corpora lutea, implantations, concepti, etc). There was a failure
`to mate in 2, l, and 1 F] M at the LD, MD, and HD, respectively, that is unlikely related
`to treatment due to absence of dose-effect. Toxicokinetic evaluation showed dose-
`
`related linear increases in exposure to parent drug and the glucuronide metabolite in the
`F1 pregnant dams, with increased exposure to the parent drug with repeated dosing at all
`but the HD, and to the glucuronide at all doses, suggesting accumulation. The NOAEL
`for F0 maternal toxicity was 50 mg/kg/day PO, based on reduced BWG and food
`consumption (representing systemic exposure of approximately 1.5 times the clinical
`exposure at the proposed MRHD on an AUC basis). The NOAEL for treatment-related ‘
`abnormalities in pup development was 20 mg/kg/day PO, due to pup deaths from PPD l-
`4 (exposure of approximately 0.3 times the clinical exposure at the MRI-ID, on an AUC
`basis). The NOAEL for the F1 generation was 300 mg/kg/day (systemic exposure of
`approximately 10 times the clinical exposure to the parent drug at the MRHD, on an
`AUC basis); although body weights were reduced, there were no effects on mating,
`fertility, and neurobehavioral parameters. Maternal systemic exposure to the main 0-
`glucuronide metabolite at the NOAEL represented approximately 35 times the clinical
`exposure to the metabolite at the MRHD, on an AUC basis.
`
`In conclusion, the results of the studies on reproductive toxicity in rats and rabbits
`suggested potential adverse effects by tapentadol on the developing fetus and newborn,
`although these effects may be related in part to drug-related poor maternal condition,
`such as nutritional deficiencies, due to decreased appetite and food consumption, and
`resulting weight loss. No direct effects on fertility were observed in male and female rats
`at doses up to the maximum tolerated, based on treatment-related toxicity and
`representing systemic exposure that were approximately equivalent to clinical exposure at
`the MRHD of 700 mg/day, using AUC comparison. No clear, treatment-related
`teratogenic effects were observed in rats (given subcutaneous and intravenous doses) and
`rabbits (given intravenous doses) at doses up to the maximum tolerated based on
`maternal toxicity during organogenesis (approximately 3 times in rats and 10 times in
`rabbits, the clinical exposure at the MRHD on an AUC basis); however, tapentadol was
`embryotoxic in these studies. However, malformations were seen in the subcutaneous
`study on embryo-fetal development in the rabbits. The degree to which maternal toxicity,
`
`229
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`'
`
`_
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`known to affect embryofetal development in rodents, was responsible for these findings,
`vs. direct teratogenicity by tapentadol is not known. The Segment II studies revealed
`developmental delay in the rats, indicated by incomplete or non-ossification of the
`stemebrae and caudal vertebral bodies. In the rabbits, decreased viability, developmental
`delay (delayed ossification of fetal skeleton), and slight dose-related increased incidence
`of variations and malformations were observed, although predominantly in the litters of
`dams showing severe treatment-related toxicity. The malformations seen in the fetal
`rabbits were within the upper range of historical incidence. Tapentadol exposure in utero
`and during lactation (Segment III) increased rat pup mortality in the days following birth,
`reduced pup body weight gain and skeletal development, and suggested a slight but not
`significant effect on learning and memory, probably due to secondary effects of maternal
`toxicity and treatment-related CNS sedation, in the offspring, at maternal doses higher
`than those representing exposure approximately equivalent to the clinical exposure at the
`MRHD on an AUC basis.
`
`Dose range-finding studies:
`
`Dose range finding studies were conducted in pregnant rats and rabbits. The results of
`two embryo-fetal toxicity studies (Studies 10434 (TP 2060) and TP2062) were reviewed
`under the original IND submission (IND 61,345, SNOOO, December 1, 2000, Kathleen
`Haberny, Ph.D., now Kathleen Young, Ph.D., Pharmacology and Toxicology Reviewer).
`The previous study reviews are provided, below.
`
`Examination of the influence of Slit-200 on the Pregnant Rat and the Fetuses by
`intravenous Administration - Embryotoxicity Study: study 10434/97
`
`Amendment #000, Vol #4, Page #1
`
`gianducting laboratory and location: Testing facility: C,
`a...
`.
`2””
`”E
`Date of study initiation: May 6, 1997
`GLP compliance: Signed and present
`QA- Report Yes (x ) No ()
`Protocol reviewed by Division Yes ( ) No (x)
`
`j?
`,l
`
`”(4)
`
`230
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`‘
`

`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`Mgthods: Pregnant Sprague—Dawleyrg SPRDI‘ats (;
`
`7 ages 7 wee s, weights 184-231 g,
`“(W 'fi
`‘n’2/2tlidose) were used in this study. The Fats were administered BN-200 (presently
`known as (365503, Batch #06, purity 98% by TLC, in physiological saline) at doses of 0,
`3, 7 and 15 mg/kg/day by intravenous bolus injection at 'lD ml/kg over 1 minute, daily
`from the 6‘h to 17‘“ day of pregnancy.
`
`d 3
`
`“4)
`
`The maternal observations Were mortality (daily), clinical signs (daily). body weights
`(daily), and food and water consumption (daily).
`
`The necropsy evaluations, conducted on gestation day 20, were uterine weights,
`examination of maternal internal organs, numbers of alive and dead fetuses, placentae
`count, sex and viability of fetuses, number and size of resorptions, corpora lutea in the
`ovaries, implantations, locations of fetuses in the uterus, gravid uterus weight, Weights
`of fetuses and placentae, external and internal inspection of fetuses for skeletal, internal
`organ, and soft tissue damages/malformations, variations, and retardations. The
`parameters were corpora lutea, implants, resorptions, placental weights, fetal weights,
`number of alive and dead fetuses per dam, per group and per sex, distribution of
`fetuses in uterine horns, runts, malformed fetuses, malformation rate, variations and
`variation rate, retardations and retardation rate, rare—implantation loss and post-
`implantation loss. No toxicokinetic analysis was conducted.
`
`Results: There were 2 maternal deaths each in the mid-dose (7 mglkgld] and high-
`dose (15 mglkg/d) groups. The mortalities occurred within 245 minutes of the first
`injection on gestation day 6. The deaths were preceded by tonic or clonic convulsions,
`exophthalmos, flaccid position, and in one high dose darn, hemorrhagic snout.
`
`There were no local reactions at or near the injection sites in any group. The clinical
`signs in the dams given the low dose (3 mglkgld) were decreased activity, head
`bobbing, and flaccid position beginning at 5-20 minutes after dosing and lasting 5-20
`minutes, on the first 2-3 dosing days. The treatment-related clinical signs in the mid-
`dose group were exophthalmos and flaccid position, and in one dam respiratory
`depression, beginning 5 minutes after dosing and lasting 20 minutes-2 hours on all
`dosing days.
`In the high-dose group, the clinical signs were tendency toward
`convulsions, flaccid position, and exophthalmos. Body weights were decreased slightly
`(-9% compared to controls) in the high-dose dams on gestation days 8-20 and body
`weight gain was reduced (57% increase compared to 69% increase in controls) on days
`6-9 and 9-12, Food consumption was reduced in the high-dose group on gestation
`days 8 and ‘12. There were no systemic necropsy findings in the dams that survived to
`necropsy. Dark-red discolored lungs were observed in the necropsy examination of the
`animals that died. The uterus weight was decreased in the mid—dose and high—dose
`dams.
`
`APPEARS TH is
`0N omcmALWAY
`
`231
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`The reproduction data of the dams is presented in the following table (reproduced from
`the original IND submission):
`
`
`
`
`_ Dose (marks/day)
`—‘-——-_
`
`
`Corpora Iutea
`total
`258
`256
`262
`235
`
`
`uer dam
`12.9
`12.8
`13.1
`11.8
`
`uer dam
`
`er dam
`
`- er clam
`
`per dam
`
`12.9
`
`1.1
`
`0.3
`
`0.8
`
`12.8
`
`1.0
`
`0,5
`
`0.4
`
`.
`
`12.6
`
`1.1
`
`0.4
`
`0.7
`
`11.6
`
`0.6
`
`0.2
`
`11.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11.1
`11.7
`11.8
`erdam
`mean °/o mi-
`Pre-im-Iantation loss
`.
`.
`
`
`mean % “—11-“
`Post-in) Iantation loss
`‘Signtficantly different from controls at 050.05
`”Significantly different from controls at ps0.01
`
`Implantation sites were decreased at the mid-dose and high-dose. Late resorptions and
`number of live fetuses were decreased in the high-dose animals.
`
`The examination of the fetuses revealed no treatment—related effects on sex
`distribution, mean placental weights, and mean fetal weights. The external examination
`showed encephalocele in one control fetus. and an abdominal hematoma in one low-
`dose fetus. There were 5 dead fetuses (1 control. 3 at 3 mglkgld, and 1 at 7 mglkgld).
`There were 4 runts (2 control, 1 at 3 mg/kgld, 'I at 15 mglkg/d).
`In the skeletal
`examination of the fetuses, there were no mattdrmations. Skeletal variations included
`accessory 14“h ribs, stemum bipartite and misaligned sternebrae in similar incidence
`among the control and treatment groups. Skeletal relardations were also observed to a
`similar extent (degree and incidence) in all groups and included incomplete ossification
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`0“ ORIGINAL
`
`of the skull and hyoid, incomplete and missing ossification or reduced size of
`sternebrae, incompletely ossified or dumbeII-shaped and bipartite thoracic, lumbar'and
`caudal vertebral bodies, and unossified 5‘h metacarpatia and 5‘“ metatarsalia. There
`were no treatment-related soft tissue malformations or variations in any group.
`
`Key Study Findings:
`0 High dose (15 mgl'kgld) resulted in matemal toxicity (tremor, convulsions, flaccid
`position, exophthalmos, decreased body weights and decreased food consumption)
`0 Reduced number of fetuses correlated with decreased matemal body weights in the
`high-dose group
`. Decreased implantation sites and late resorptions. probably related to maternal
`toxicity. at 15 mg/kgfd
`o No treatment-related effects on sex distribution, placenta weight, fetal weight, fetal
`deaths and incidence of runts
`. No effects of BN-200 on external, skeletal and soft tissue malformations, variations
`and retardations at doses ranging from 3-15 mgi‘kgl'cl IV, when administered on
`gestation days 6-17 in rats
`
`232
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`Examination of the Influence of BN-200 on the Pregnant Rabbit and the Fetus by
`Intravenous Administration - Embryotoxicity Study: Study TP 2062
`
`Amendment #000, Vol #3, Page #1
`
`I;
`
`Date of study'initiation: June 17, 1997
`GLP compliance: Signed and present
`QA— Report 'Yes (x ) No ()
`Protocol reviewed by Division Yes ( ) No (x)
`
`Mair
`”.2
`
`M4)
`
`Methods: Pregnant Himalayan rabbits (own breed ages 5 57 months, weights 2.53-
`3.60 kg, n=161dose) were usedIn this study. The rabbits were administered BN-200
`(presently known as 065503, Batch #06 purity 98% by TLC in physiological saline) at
`doses of 0. 1 3 and 9 mg/kgiday by intravenous bolus injectionIn an ear vein at 3 mlikg
`over 1 minute daily from the 6‘h to 20‘“ day of pregnancy.
`
`The maternal observations were mortality, local tolerance at the injection site, clinical
`signs, body weights, and food and water consumption.
`
`Necroscopic examination on gestation day 29 inclirded number of dead and alive
`fetuses, placental count, fetal viability (after S—h and 24-h stay in incubator), number and
`size of resorptions, corpora lutea in ovaries, and implantations, and location of fetuses
`in uterus, fetal weights, placental weights, extemal inspection for fetal damage
`(malfomiations, variations, retardations), fetal dissection for location, size and condition
`of the intemal organs, abnormalities of soft tissue, internal head structure and brain, APPEARS firms WAY
`Oil ORIGltlAL
`
`fetal sex, and skeletal retardations, variations and malformations. The evaluations were
`corpora lutea, implants, resorptions, weight of placentae, weight of fetuses, live and
`dead fetuses, runts, malformed fetuses, malformation rate per group, fetuses with
`variations, variation rate, fetuses with retardations, retardation rate, pre-implantation
`loss, and post-implantation loss.
`
`* Blood was withdrawn for toxicokinetic analysis before closing and at 15, 60 and 120
`minutes on pregnancy days 6 and 20, from 3 rabbits per group.
`
`Results: There were no maternal deaths, and no local reactions at or near the injection
`sites in any group. Clinical signs were observed in all dams at the high dose of 9
`mglkgld N on several dosing days, and included opisthotonus (spasm consisting of
`‘hyperextension of the body), flaccid position, and increased respiratOIy rate. Tremor
`was occasionally observed, and there was one abortion on gestation day 26 at the high
`close, There were no treatment-related effects on body weights, body weight changes,
`food and water consumption, and no pathologic findings at the iniection site in the
`necropsy examination. The systemic necropsy showed liver discoloration in one dam
`each in the low-dose {1 mgikgfd) and high-dose (9 mgi'kgld) groups.
`In one high dose
`dam, there was a hemorrhage in the right uterine horn, with a thickened, malshaped
`placenta; all fetuses were found dead in this dam. The single abortion contained 2
`normal appearing fetuses with l placenta: 7 dead fetuses ands placentae remained in
`the uterus Net weIght change from days to necropsy Nas slightly IeducedIn the high
`dose clams
`
`233
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Kathleen Young, Ph.D.
`
`.
`
`NDA No. 22-304
`
`The reproduction data of the dams is presented in the following table (reproduced from
`the original IND submission):
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`implantation sites
`
`
`
`_ Dose (mglkgldav)
`
`
`—__-__‘-
`
`Corpora lutea
`total
`152
`142
`145
`141
`- er dam
`9.5
`8.9
`9.1
`9.4
`total
`137
`133
`131
`128
`
`per dam
`8.6
`8.3
`8.2
`8.5
`Resorptions
`total
`
`
`10
`
`Early resorptions
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7.2
`7.6
`7.4
`7.4
`per dam
`'
`
`
`—-“-§_
`
`
`
`Post—implantation loss
`mean %
`*Significantly different from controls at ps0.05
`*‘Slgnificantly different from controls at ps0.01
`
`- er dam
`
`0.7
`
`0.7
`
`0.9
`
`Post-implantation loss was increased, although not significantly, in the high dose group
`due to the significant decrease

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket