throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`22-228
`
`
`
`APPLICA TI0N NUMBER:
`
`CROSS DISCIPLINE TEAM
`
`LEADER REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`
`22-228
`
`CROSS DISCIPLINE TEAM
`LEADER REVIEW
`
`

`

`
`Date
`From
`Subject
`NDA #
`Applicant
`Date of Submission
`PDUFA Goal Date
`Type of Application
`Name
`Dosage forms / Strength
`Proposed Indication(s)
`
`Recommended:
`
`
`Cross-Discipline Team Leader Review
`
`August 25, 2009
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`Cross-Discipline Team Leader Review
`22-288
`ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`November 12, 2008
`September 12, 2009
`505(b)(1)
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`Topical ophthalmic solution
`Indicated for the treatment of itching associated with
`allergic conjunctivitis
`Recommended for Approval
`
`1. Introduction
`
`
`Chemical Structure of Bepotastine Besilate
`
`
`
`
`Bepotastine besilate (+)-(S)-4-{4-[(4-Chlorophenyl)(2-pyridyl)methoxy] piperidino} butyric acid
`monobenzenesulfonate was originally developed in Japan by Ube Industries, Ltd. and Tanabe Seiyaku
`Co., Ltd. as a treatment for allergic rhinitis. Bepotastine besilate is a histamine H1 receptor antagonist
`and has an inhibitory action on eosinophilic infiltration to inflammatory sites.
`
`The support of clinical safety and efficacy for bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution included 3
`clinical studies conducted in the United States under IND 66,864. One safety study (CL-SAF-
`0405071-P) and two efficacy studies (ISTA-BEPO-CS01 and CL-S&E-0409071-P) were performed.
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`
`
`2. Background
`
`
`An oral preparation of bepotastine besilate [Talion tablets, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation
`(formerly Tanabe Seiyaku Company, Ltd.)] was approved in Japan in July 2000 as a treatment for
`allergic rhinitis (10mg p.o. bid for up to 4 weeks). In January 2002, the additional indication of
`pruritus/itching accompanying urticaria and other skin diseases was approved in Japan. Bepotastine is
`a new molecular entity in the United States.
`
`Studies CL-S&E-0409071 and CL-SAF-0405071 (7/23/07 SPA response) were performed after
`submission of a Special Protocol Assessment (SPA). There was an EOP 2 Meeting held on 8/15/07, a
`SPA Meeting held on 9/17/08, and a pre-NDA Meeting on 8/4/08.
`
`The efficacy endpoints chosen for the phase 3 studies have been widely used in clinical studies of
`ophthalmic solutions and are recognized as reliable, accurate, and relevant for evaluation of the
`efficacy and safety of investigational products. For an indication for the treatment of allergic
`conjunctivitis, a demonstration of efficacy is recommeded to include evidence of statistical
`significance and clinical relevance in the resolution of both ocular itching and redness. In the case of
`antigen challenge studies or controlled environmental studies, the difference between groups is
`recommended to be at least one unit on a scale from zero to four.
`
`
`
`Table of Currently Available Treatments for Proposed Indication of Itching Associated with
`Allergic Conjunctivitis
`
`Name of Drug
`Nedocromil
`Ketorolac
`Azelastine
`Pemirolast
`Olopatanol
`Epinastine
`
`NDA
`21-009
`19-700
`21-127
`21-079
`21-545
`21-565
`
`
`Brand Name
`Alocril
`Acular
`Optivar
`Alamast
`Pataday
`Elestat
`
`Adverse events for this class of drugs (topical H1 antagonists) are well known. Common side effects
`seen with this class include: headache, asthenia, blurry vision, eye burning/stinging upon instillation,
`eye pain, cold/flu symptoms, cough, fatigue, dry eye, foreign body sensation, lid edema, keratitis,
`hyperemia, nausea, phayrngitis, pruritis, rhinitis, sinusitis, sore throat, and taste perversion/bitter taste.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`
`3. CMC
`
`
`From the two CMC Reviews finalized 7/27/09 and 8/9/09:
`
`Bepotastine besilate is manufactured by Ube Industries and the information for the NDA is submitted
`through DMF #19966. Bepotastine besilate is a white crystalline powder with
`.
`It is very soluble in
` but sparingly soluble in
`. It is stable when exposed to
`light, and optically active. The S-isomer is the active drug and
`is controlled as an impurity
`through synthesis. The distribution coefficient in 1-octanol is higher than in aqueous buffer in the pH
`5-9 range. There are 10 potential impurities but only one impurity is above 0.1%. Two potential
`
`genotoxic impurities
` are controlled below
` is controlled below
`. Residual
`. Bepotastine besilate is stable under long term storage
`conditions for (25ºC/60% RH) over 5 years.
`
`Bepotastine besilate was originally developed as an oral tablet dosage form and received approval in
`Japan in 2000 for allergic rhinitis. Bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution 1.5% is an aqueous
`solution to be administered as drops at or near physiological pH range of tears. The formulation
`contains sodium chloride, monobasic sodium phosphate as dihydrate, benzalkonium chloride, sodium
`hydroxide and purified water; typically these components are used for adjusting tonicity, preservative
`action, pH adjustment, buffering capacity and a vehicle for administration. It was demonstrated during
`the formulation development that sodium chloride, in addition to its use to
`
` All excipients are of USP/NF grade. It is manufactured as a
`
` solution.
`
`
`DESCRIPTION AND COMPOSITION OF THE DRUG PRODUCT:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Table of Composition of Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b
`)
`(4
`)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`
`PROPOSED REGULATORY SPECIFICATIONS:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`
`
`From the CMC Review finalized 7/27/09:
`
`FACILITIES INSPECTIONS:
`The overall recommendation from the Office of Compliance is “Acceptable” in EES.
`
`4. Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology
`
`
`From the original Pharmacology/Toxicology Review finalized 7/21/09:
`
`The pharmacology/toxicology reviewer has no objection to the approval of this NDA.
`
`Bepotastine besilate in the Bepreve formulation did not cause ocular inflammation or histopathologic
`changes in rabbits or dogs. There are some data that suggest that Bepreve may have an affinity for
`melanin binding based on the observation of presence in the iris in an ocular toxicity study and to
`pigmented tissues in a radiolabeled study. This association with melanin appears to be reversible,
`reaching levels below limit of detection when given enough time for clearance after dosing (e.g. 30
`days after single dose of radiolabeled compound, bepotastine besilate was no longer detected in
`pigmented tissues).
`
`The pivotal study for the proposed indication was a 26 week study in dogs using 4 and 8X per day
`dosing with the 1.5% TAU-284 solution. The 4X/day dosing paradigm was determined to be the
`NOAEL based on decreases in A and B wave amplitude in electroretinograms (ERG) in the 8X/day
`dose group. When considering systemic exposures seen in this study, the identified NOAEL for ERG
`endpoints provides a 15X safety factor over that of anticipated systemic exposures seen with topical
`ocular use in humans. Several short term ocular toxicity studies demonstrated that bepotastine besilate
`solutions up to 2% in concentration were well tolerated in various animal species. Bepreve also did not
`demonstrate strong hypersensitivity reactions with repeated use.
`
`Although bepotastine besilate appears to be a substrate for Cyp450 metabolism in rodents, it does not
`appear to be a target/inhibitor of human CYP450 enzymes. In both rats and dogs, test article is
`primarily excreted in feces and urine. Additional information may be found in the clinical
`pharmacology review.
`
`The exec-CAC concluded that bepotastine besilate did not significantly induce neoplasms in 2 year
`dietary carcinogenicity studies in mice (at margin of exposure relative to human after ophthalmic use
`of 353) or in rats (at a margin of exposure relative to human of 200) .
`
`Pregnancy category C is recommended for this product due to the observation of a rare skeletal
`malformation seen in the fertility/early embryo development study in rats at the 1000 mg/kg dose. The
`approximate margin of exposure for the 200 mg/kg/day NOAEL identified in this study was 3,300X
`that of anticipated human systemic exposure with topical ocular use. In rats given oral doses of 100
`mg/kg/day, an increased incidence of stillborns was observed (~200X human systemic exposure for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`ocular use). At the 1000 mg/kg/day dose level in this same study, an increase in stillborns, decreased
`survival and decreased rate of development were observed in pups. There were no effects observed in
`rats treated with 10 mg/kg/day (representing a maximal systemic concentration approximately 18 times
`that anticipated for topical ocular use in humans).
`
`From a radiolabeled study in pregnant rats, it is recognized that bepotastine besilate can rapidly
`distribute to the yolk sac/placenta and to the fetus. Bepotastine besilate was transferred to the yolk
`sac/placenta at levels nearly equivalent to maternal maximal plasma concentration; ~33-55% of
`bepotastine besilate was transferred to the developing fetus. At 24 hours following a single oral
`administration of 3 mg/kg, ~ 5.9% and 3.1% of maximal plasma TAU-284 concentrations were
`detected in the brain and liver of the fetus at 24 hours postdose. Bepotastine besilate was also noted to
`be transferred to milk in lactating rats, with milk concentrations being 1.5 to 2 times maximal plasma
`concentrations by 1 hour postdose and reaching levels below the limit of detection by 48 hours
`postdose.
`
`
`5. Clinical Pharmacology/Biopharmaceutics
`
`
`From the original Clinical Pharmacology Review finalized 5/22/09:
`
`The clinical pharmacology information provided by the Applicant is acceptable.
`
`The applicant submitted clinical pharmacology data for bepotastine from the Japanese development
`programs, including a Phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) study examining systemic exposure following
`bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solutions 1.0% and 1.5% instilled as repeated doses (QID) over a 7 day
`period (Study SNJ-TO-02), as well as data from multiple Phase 1 studies from the oral development
`program. The clinical pharmacology information provided by the Applicant is acceptable.
`
`
`
`6. Sterility Assurance
`
`
`From the original Product Quality Microbiology Review finalized 6/17/09:
`
`There are no microbiology deficiencies identified.
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`(b) (4)
`
`1 Page(s) has been Withheld in Full following this page as B4 (CCI/TS)
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`
`
`7. Clinical/Statistical - Efficacy
`
`
`From the original Medical Officer Review dated 8/13/2009:
`
`Analyses of Endpoints
`
`Primary Efficacy Variables for Studies ISTA-BEPO-CSO1 and CL-S&E-0409071-P
`
`The primary efficacy variables were:
`• Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge (0-4 unit [nine step]
`scale, allowing half unit [one step] increments)
`• Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge (0-4
`unit [9 step] scale, allowing half unit [one step] increments).
`
`
`To demonstrate clinical significance in a CAC study, the difference between groups should be at least
`one unit on a scale from 0-4 at a majority of the time points evaluated. This endpoint was duplicated
`in two trials only at the 8 hours post-dosing CAC with both concentrations of drug (bepotastine 1%
`and 1.5%). Bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution 1.5% produced greater clinical response than
`bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution 1% in reducing ocular itching at both 8-hour and 16- hour
`duration-of-action time points versus vehicle. The data support bepotastine 1.5% with bid dosing for
`the treatment of itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`ITCHING
`
`Study ISTA-BEPO-CSO1: Ocular Itching (ITT Population with LOCF)
`
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`N=35
`
`2.57
`2.81
`2.82
`
`
`1.16
`1.34
`1.31
`
`
`0.73
`0.80
`0.82
`
`
`0.49
`0.71
`0.67
`
`
`Visit
`
`Visit 2
`3 Minutes Post-Challenge
`5 Minutes Post-Challenge
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`
`Visit 3b – 16 Hour
`3 Minutes Post-Challenge
`5 Minutes Post-Challenge
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`
`Visit 4 – 8 Hour
`3 Minutes Post-Challenge
`5 Minutes Post-Challenge
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`
`Visit 5 – 15 minutes
`3 Minutes Post-Challenge
`5 Minutes Post-Challenge
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`
`Visit
`
`
`Bepotastine 1%
`N=36
`
`2.52
`2.73
`2.75
`
`
`1.44
`1.58
`1.44
`
`
`1.15
`1.29
`1.27
`
`
`0.56
`0.72
`0.70
`
`Vehicle
`N=36
`
`2.35
`2.76
`2.81
`
`
`2.10
`2.37
`2.27
`
`
`2.06
`2.33
`2.23
`
`
`1.87
`2.07
`1.95
`
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`Difference in
`Mean Itching
`Grades (Vehicle
`– Active)
`
`
`0.9
`1.0
`1.0
`
`
`
`1.3
`1.5
`1.4
`
`
`
`1.4
`1.4
`1.3
`
`p-value
`
`
`
`<0.001
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
`
`
`<0.001
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
`
`
`<0.001
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
`p-value
`
`
`
`0.002
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
`
`
`<0.001
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
`
`
`<0.001
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
`Bepotastine 1%
`Difference in
`Mean Itching
`Grades (Vehicle
`– Active)
`
`
`Visit 3B (Day 1)-CAC at 16 hours
`post dosing
`3 min post-CAC
`5 min post-CAC
`7 min post-CAC
`
`Visit 4 (Day 14)-CAC at 8 hours
`post-dosing
`3 min post-CAC
`5 min post-CAC
`7 min post-CAC
`
`Visit 5 (Day 28)-CAC at 15 minutes
`post-dosing
`3 min post-CAC
`5 min post-CAC
`7 min post-CAC
`
`
`0.7
`0.8
`0.8
`
`
`
`0.9
`1.0
`1.0
`
`
`
`1.3
`1.4
`1.3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`Study CL-S&E-0409071-P: Ocular Itching (ITT Population with LOCF)
`
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`N=43
`0
`3.22
`
`
`2.51
`2.99
`3.07
`
`
`1.23
`1.44
`1.23
`
`
`0.89
`0.95
`0.87
`
`
`0.4
`0.46
`0.51
`
`
`Visit
`
`Visit 1-Baseline
`10 Minutes post-challenge
`
`Visit 2
`3 Minutes Post-Challenge
`5 Minutes Post-Challenge
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`
`Visit 3b – 16 Hours
`3 Minutes Post-Challenge
`5 Minutes Post-Challenge
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`
`Visit 4 – 8 Hours
`3 Minutes Post-Challenge
`5 Minutes Post-Challenge
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`
`Visit 5 – 15 Minutes
`3 Minutes Post-Challenge
`5 Minutes Post-Challenge
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`
`Visit
`
`
`Bepotastine 1%
`N=44
`0
`3.3
`
`
`2.57
`2.99
`3.05
`
`
`1.27
`1.42
`1.19
`
`
`0.96
`1.01
`0.94
`
`
`0.42
`0.6
`0.64
`
`Vehicle
`N=43
`0
`3.23
`
`
`2.63
`2.9
`3.05
`
`
`1.83
`2.15
`2.02
`
`
`2.18
`2.27
`2.1
`
`
`1.85
`2.07
`1.93
`
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`Difference in
`Mean Itching
`Grades (Vehicle
`– Active)
`
`
`0.6
`0.7
`0.8
`
`
`
`1.3
`1.3
`1.2
`
`
`
`1.5
`1.6
`1.4
`
`P value
`
`
`
`0.0051
`0.0021
`0.0003
`
`
`
`<0.001
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
`
`
`<0.001
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
`P value
`
`
`
`0.0055
`0.0006
`0.0001
`
`
`
`<0.001
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
`
`
`<0.001
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
`
`
`10
`
`Bepotastine 1%
`Difference in
`Mean Itching
`Grades (Vehicle
`– Active)
`
`
`Visit 3B (Day 1)-CAC at 16 hours
`post-dosing
`3 min post-CAC
`5 min post-CAC
`7 min post-CAC
`
`Visit 4 (Day 14)-CAC at 8 hours
`post-dosing
`3 min post-CAC
`5 min post-CAC
`7 min post-CAC
`
`Visit 5 (Day 28)-CAC at 15 minutes
`post-dosing
`3 min post-CAC
`5 min post-CAC
`7 min post-CAC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0.6
`0.7
`0.8
`
`
`
`1.2
`1.3
`1.2
`
`
`
`1.4
`1.5
`1.3
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`REDNESS
`
`
`Visit
`
`Bepotastine 1%
`N=44
`
`Visit 2
`2.01
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`2.21
`15 Minute Post-Challenge
`20 Minutes Post-Challenge 2.19
`
`
`Visit 3b
`
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`1.42
`15 Minutes Post-Challenge 1.53
`20 Minutes Post-Challenge 1.47
`
`
`Visit 4
`
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`1.26
`15 Minutes Post-Challenge 1.56
`20 Minutes Post-Challenge 1.55
`
`
`Visit 5
`
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`1.11
`15 Minute Post-Challenge
`1.45
`20 Minutes Post-Challenge 1.44
`
`Vehicle
`N=43
`
`2.10
`2.25
`2.25
`
`
`1.79
`1.81
`1.70
`
`
`1.67
`1.84
`1.84
`
`
`1.91
`2.05
`1.95
`
`Study ISTA-BEPO-CSO1: Clinical Assessment of Conjunctival Redness (ITT Population with LOCF)
`
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`N=43
`
`2.03
`2.29
`2.28
`
`
`1.63
`1.81
`1.78
`
`
`1.30
`1.47
`1.52
`
`
`1.37
`1.65
`1.62
`
`
`Time of Post-CAC Observation
`
`
`Visit 3B
`7 min post-CAC
`15 min post-CAC
`20 min post-CAC
`
`Visit 4
`7 min post-CAC
`15 min post-CAC
`20 min post-CAC
`
`Visit 5
`7 min post-CAC
`15 min post-CAC
`20 min post-CAC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Bepotastine 1%
`Difference in
`Mean Redness
`Grades (Vehicle
`– Active)
`
`0.4
`0.3
`0.2
`
`
`0.4
`0.3
`0.3
`
`
`0.8
`0.6
`0.5
`
`P value
`
`
`0.012
`0.048
`0.102
`
`
`0.014
`0.071
`0.083
`
`
`<0.001
`<0.001
`<0.001
`
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`Difference in
`Mean Redness
`Grades (Vehicle
`– Active)
`
`0.2
`0.0
`-0.1
`
`
`0.4
`0.4
`0.3
`
`
`0.6
`0.4
`0.3
`
`P value
`
`
`0.208
`0.755
`0.711
`
`
`0.029
`0.062
`0.137
`
`
`0.004
`0.039
`0.151
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`Study CL-S&E-049071-P: Clinical Assessment of Conjunctival Redness (ITT Population with LOCF)
`
`Visit
`
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`N=43
`0.63
`2.68
`
`
`0.67
`2.46
`2.59
`2.60
`
`0.63
`
`
`1.80
`1.85
`1.87
`
`
`0.69
`1.59
`1.76
`1.77
`
`
`0.60
`1.42
`1.59
`1.67
`
`Vehicle
`N=43
`0.58
`2.60
`
`
`0.63
`2.40
`2.53
`2.50
`
`0.6
`
`
`1.89
`1.99
`1.98
`
`
`0.63
`1.8
`1.88
`1.84
`
`
`0.56
`1.85
`1.97
`1.87
`
`Bepotastine 1%
`N=44
`0.52
`Visit 1-Baseline
`2.6
`10 minutes post-challenge
`
`
`
`Visit 2
`0.65
`Pre-CAC
`2.41
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`2.49
`15 Minute Post-Challenge
`20 Minutes Post-Challenge 2.52
`
`
`Visit 3a Pre-CAC
`0.61
`
`
`Visit 3b
`
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`1.46
`15 Minutes Post-Challenge 1.6
`20 Minutes Post-Challenge 1.62
`
`
`Visit 4
`
`Pre-CAC
`0.6
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`1.35
`15 Minutes Post-Challenge 1.57
`20 Minutes Post-Challenge 1.59
`
`
`Visit 5
`
`Pre-CAC
`0.49
`7 Minutes Post-Challenge
`1.28
`15 Minute Post-Challenge
`1.51
`20 Minutes Post-Challenge 1.64
`
`Time of Post-CAC Observation
`
`
`Bepotastine 1%
`Difference in
`Mean Redness
`Grades (Vehicle
`– Active)
`
`0.4
`0.4
`0.4
`
`
`0.5
`0.3
`0.3
`
`
`0.6
`0.5
`0.2
`
`P value
`
`
`0.005
`0.017
`0.041
`
`
`0.001
`0.036
`0.103
`
`
`0.001
`0.002
`0.148
`
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`Difference in
`Mean Redness
`Grades (Vehicle
`– Active)
`
`0.1
`0.1
`0.1
`
`
`0.2
`0.1
`0.1
`
`
`0.4
`0.4
`0.2
`
`P value
`
`
`0.547
`0.388
`0.500
`
`
`0.107
`0.360
`0.591
`
`
`0.003
`0.011
`0.225
`
`
`
`12
`
`Visit 3B
`7 min post-CAC
`15 min post-CAC
`20 min post-CAC
`
`Visit 4
`7 min post-CAC
`15 min post-CAC
`20 min post-CAC
`
`Visit 5
`7 min post-CAC
`15 min post-CAC
`20 min post-CAC
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`Neither concentration of bepotastine provides a clinically significant reduction in redness compared to
`vehicle at any study visit during the treatment period.
`
`Secondary Efficacy Variables for Studies ISTA-BEPO-CSO1 and CL-S&E-0409071-P
`
`Ocular symptom scores:
`• Ciliary and episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post
`challenge (0-4 unit (nine step) scale, with half unit (one step) increments allowed)
`• Chemosis evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge (0-4 unit (one
`step) scale, with half unit (one step) increments allowed)
`• Lid swelling evaluated by the subject at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge (0-3 unit scale,
`whole unit increments only)
`• Tearing evaluated by the subject at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge (graded absent or
`present)
`• Ocular mucous discharge evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge
`(graded absent or present)
`
`
`Non-ocular symptom scores:
`• Rhinorrhea, ear or palate pruritus, nasal pruritus, and nasal congestion evaluated by the subject at
`7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge (0-4 unit scale, whole unit increments only)
`• A composite score of rhinorrhea, ear or palate pruritus, nasal pruritus, and nasal congestion
`evaluated by the subject at 7, 15, and 20 minutes (0-16 unit scale)
`
`
`None of the secondary endpoints achieved clinical success (i.e., both statistical and clinical
`significance) as defined in the trial protocol in either study.
`
`Efficacy Summary Statement
`
`There is substantial evidence of effectiveness consisting of adequate and well controlled studies which
`demonstrate that patients receiving Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`experienced a statistically and clinically significant response in the reduction of ocular itching. The
`data support Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5% administered twice a day for the
`treatment of itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.
`
`There is not substantial evidence that patients receiving Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic
`solution) 1.5% experienced a statistically and clinically significant response in the reduction of ocular
`redness. The data does not support Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`administered twice a day for the treatment of redness associated with allergic conjunctivitis.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`8. Safety
`
`
`From the original Medical Officer Review dated 8/13/2009:
`
`Three studies are used to support the safety and efficacy of bepotastine. The main support for the
`safety of bepotastine besilate 1.5% comes from Study CL-SAF-0405071. The patient exposure and
`safety assessments were adequate.
`
`
`Treatment Duration (Safety Population) for Study CL-SAF-0405071
`
`Mean Treatment Duration (Days, +/- sd)
`Treatment Group
`40.4 (6.7)
`Bepotastine besilate 1.5% (N=572)
`42.0 (0.4)
` Age 3-9 (N=47)
`41.2 (5.6)
` Age 10-17 (N=40)
`40.1 (7.1)
` Age >=18 (N=485)
`
`
`40.6 (6.5)
`Vehicle (N=286)
`42.0 (0.4)
` Age 3-9 (N=25)
`42.1 (0.3)
` Age 10-17 (N=15)
`40.3 (6.9)
` Age >= 18 (N=246)
`*Treatment duration was defined as the number of days between the first and last instillation of masked investigational
`product.
`
`No patient or subject deaths occurred during the conduct of the two Phase 3 clinical studies and the
`additional safety study that form the basis of this application.
`
`
`
`
`Bepotastine 1%
`
`Study ISTA-BEPO-CSO1: Patient Disposition
`
`Bepotastine besilate 1.5%
`
`35
`35
`35
`32
`
`36
`36
`36
`35
`
`Vehicle
`
`36
`36
`36
`34
`
`Randomized
`Safety Population
`ITT Population with LOCF
`PP Population
`
`
`Subject No.
`1026-025
`1045-040
`1064-052
`1140-063
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Study ISTA-BEPO-CSO1: Patient Withdrawals
`
`Treatment Group Reason For Withdrawal
`Vehicle
`Subject decision/non-compliance-missed Visit 3B and Visit 4
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`Subject decision/non-compliance-missed Visit 3B and Visit 4
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`Unacceptable baseline itching and redness at Visit 5
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`Subject decision/non-compliance-missed Visit 3B and Visit 4
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`
`Study CL-S&E-0409071: Patient Disposition
`
`Bepotastine 1% Bepotastine besilate 1.5%
`
`43
`43
`43
`38
`
`44
`44
`44
`43
`
`Vehicle
`
`43
`43
`43
`36
`
`
`
`Randomized
`Safety Population
`ITT Population with LOCF
`PP Population
`
`
`Study CL-S&E-0409071: Patient Withdrawals
`
`
`Reason For Withdrawal
`Treatment Group
`Subject No.
`Subject decision/non-compliance
`Vehicle
`1003-050
`Subject decision/non-compliance
`Vehicle
`2001-066
`Subject decision/non-compliance
`Vehicle
`3016-010
`Subject decision/non-compliance
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`3028-027
`Exclusion criteria*
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`3057-002
`Subject decision/non-compliance
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`4007-125
`Subject decision/non-compliance
`Vehicle
`4045-128
`Subject decision/non-compliance
`Vehicle
`5003-110
`Subject decision/non-compliance
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`5005-111
`Exclusion criteria*
`Bepotastine 1.5%
`5012-099
`Subject decision/non-compliance
`Vehicle
`5016-098
`Subject decision/non-compliance
`Bepotastine 1%
`5031 -097
`Subject decision/non-compliance
`Vehicle
`5034-101
`*Subjects manifested signs or symptoms of clinically active allergic conjunctivitis (defined as any ocular itching or an
`ocular redness score >1, for any vessel bed) at the start of the study visit.
`
`
`Study CL-SAF-0405071: Subject Disposition
`
`Bepotastine besilate 1.5%
`
`575
`Number of Randomized subjects
`575
`Number of Subjects in Safety Population *
`87
`Number of Pediatric Subjects in Safety Population
`133
`Patients that Underwent ECC-Baseline
`125
`Patients that Underwent ECC- Day 84
`532 (92.5%)
`Number of Subjects Completed Study**
`
`Reason For Withdrawal
`6
` AE
`3
` Protocol Violation
`32
` Subject Decision/Non-Compliance
`2
` Other
`*Safety population defined as subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product.
`**A completed subject is defined as one who has completed all study visits and received at least 75% of scheduled doses.
`
`Twelve subjects withdrew from the study early with an AE being listed as the reason for study
`discontinuation (six in bepotastine group and six in the vehicle group).
`
`
`
`
`Vehicle
`286
`286
`40
`69
`68
`269 (94.1%)
`
`6
`0
`10
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`
`Subject Number
`3010-541
`3018-549
`3076-604
`3079-607
`
`Treatment Group
`Bepotastine
`Vehicle
`Vehicle
`Bepotastine
`
`Study CL-SAF-0405071: Patient Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events
`
`AE Leading to Discontinuation
`Intermittent headaches associated with study drops
`Sinusitis and ear infection
`Neck and shoulder pain subsequent to car accident
`Intermittent HTN worsening over 20 days of dosing and non-ocular
`allergies
`Pneumonia
`Intermittent headache and earache
`Sinusitis
`Eyelid pain and eyelid margin crusting
`Bronchitis and ocular stinging and photophobia
`Eye irritation, redness, blurred vision, and burning upon instillation
`Three styes
`Eye irritation
`
`Bepotastine
`Bepotastine
`Vehicle
`Vehicle
`Bepotastine
`Vehicle
`Vehicle
`Bepotastine
`
`3098-625
`3102-629
`5084-842
`6059-053
`6110-093
`6241-209
`6300-259
`6318-274
`
`
`Study CL-SAF-0405071: Treatment Emergent Ocular Adverse Events (Safety Population)
`
`
`
`Eye disorders
`Eye irritation
`Dry eye
`Ocular hyperemia
`Asthenopia
`Eye pain
`Eye puritis
`Lacrimation increased
`Photophobia
`Conjunctival cyst
`Conjunctival hemorrhage
`Eyelid margin crusting
`Eyelid pain
`FBS
`Punctate keratitis
`Abnormal sensation in eye
`Eye discharge
`Eye swelling
`Eye edema
`Eyelid pruritis
`Glare
`Keratitis
`Vision blurred
`Vitreous floaters
`
`Vascular Disorders
`Hyperemia
`
`General disorders
`
`
`
`
`Bepotastine besilate 1.5%
`N=575
`
`27
`6
`2
`1
`2
`3
`3
`2
`1
`0
`1
`1
`2
`1
`0
`0
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`1
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Vehicle
`N=286
`
`6
`5
`4
`3
`2
`1
`0
`1
`1
`2
`1
`1
`0
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`0
`
`
`0
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`
`
`Sensation of pressure
`
`Infections
`Hordeolum
`
`Injury
`Contusion
`
`Skin disorders
`Photosenstivity reaction
`
`Nervous system disorders
`Taste perversion
`Bad taste
`Headache
`After taste
`Nerve compression
`Parosmia
`Taste abnormality
`Taste bitter
`Taste metallic
`
`Infections
`Nasophayngitis
`Influenza
`Sinusitis
`Bronchitis
`UTI
`Ear infection
`Folliculitis
`Herpes zoster
`Pharyngitis
`Pneumonia
`Tooth abscess
`Vaginal infection
`Viral pharyngitis
`
`Respiratory disorders
`Nasal congestion
`Rhinorrhea
`Cough
`Post-nasal drip
`Pharngolaryngeal pain
`Sneezing
`Wheezing
`Asthma
`Sinus congestion
`
`Musculoskeletal
`Back pain
`
`
`
`
`Bepotastine besilate 1.5%
`N=575
`0
`
`
`0
`
`
`0
`
`
`1
`
`
`84
`45
`20
`14
`0
`1
`1
`1
`1
`
`
`12
`3
`1
`2
`1
`0
`1
`1
`0
`1
`0
`1
`0
`
`
`5
`3
`2
`4
`1
`2
`2
`1
`1
`
`
`1
`
`Vehicle
`N=286
`1
`
`
`1
`
`
`1
`
`
`0
`
`
`4
`1
`7
`2
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`
`5
`0
`2
`0
`1
`1
`0
`0
`1
`0
`1
`0
`1
`
`
`0
`2
`2
`0
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`
`
`Plantar fasciitis
`Tendonitis
`Arthralgia
`Musculoskeletal pain
`Neck pain
`Osteoarthritis
`Pain in extremity
`
`GI disorders
`GERD
`Tooth impacted
`Abdominal pain
`Dry mouth
`Nausea
`Paresthesia oral
`Vomiting
`
`Injury and poisoning
`Contusion
`Accident
`Animal bite
`Fall
`Joint sprain
`Limb injury
`Procedural pain
`Road traffic accident
`Tendon rupture
`
`Skin disorders
`Drug eruption
`Eczema
`Rash
`Urticaria
`
`Ear disorders
`Ear pain
`Eustachian tube obstruction
`Tinnitus
`
`Cardiac disorders
`Extrasystole
`
`General disorders
`Chest pain
`
`Immune system disorders
`Hypersensitivity
`
`Metabolism disorder
`Hypercholesterolemia
`
`
`
`
`Bepotastine besilate 1.5%
`N=575
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`1
`1
`
`
`2
`1
`0
`1
`1
`0
`0
`
`
`1
`1
`0
`1
`1
`0
`1
`1
`0
`
`
`1
`0
`1
`0
`
`
`1
`1
`1
`
`
`1
`
`
`1
`
`
`1
`
`
`0
`
`Vehicle
`N=286
`1
`1
`0
`1
`1
`0
`0
`
`
`0
`1
`1
`0
`0
`1
`1
`
`
`1
`0
`1
`0
`0
`1
`0
`0
`1
`
`
`0
`1
`0
`1
`
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`
`0
`
`
`0
`
`
`0
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`18
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`
`
`Vehicle
`Bepotastine besilate 1.5%
`N=286
`N=575
`
`
`
`
`
`Vascular disorders
`0
`1
`HTN
`*Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as those occurring during the 6-week dosing period.
`
`The most commonly reported non-ocular AEs were in the taste-related category. The taste-related
`category includes specific AEs described by the subjects as taste perversion, bad taste, aftertaste, taste
`abnormality, bitter taste, or metallic taste. In the bepotastine 1.5% group, 25% of subjects reported at
`least 1 taste-related AE. This incidence had a statistical significance greater than the 2.4% incidence
`reported in the vehicle treatment group (P <0.0001).
`
`Safety Summary Statement
`
`There is substantial evidence of safety consisting of adequate and well controlled studies which
`demonstrate that Bepreve, dosed twice a day, is safe for the treatment of itching associated with
`allergic conjunctivitis.
`
`The most common adverse reaction occurring in approximately 25% of patients was a taste perversion
`following instillation. Other adverse reactions which occurred in 2-5% of subjects were eye irritation,
`headache, and nasopharyngitis.
`
`
`9. Advisory Committee Meeting
`
`
`The Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee of the Food and Drug Administration
`met on June 26, 2009 at the Hilton Hotel Washington/Silver Spring, 8727 Colesville Road, Silver
`Spring, Maryland. Michael X. Repka, M.D., chaired the meeting.
`
`Attendance:
`Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee Members present (voting):
`Michael X. Repka, M.D. (Acting Chair), Allan R. Rutzen, M.D.
`Temporary Voting Members:
`Michael W. Belin, M.D.; Lynn K. Gordon, M.D., Ph.D.; Susan M. MacDonald, M.D.; Philip Lavin,
`Ph.D.; Paula Cofer (Patient Representative)
`Industry Representative (non-voting):
`Ellen Strahlman, M.D., M.H.Sc
`FDA Participants (non-voting):
`Edward M. Cox, M.D., MPH; Wiley Chambers, M.D.; Rhea Lloyd, M.D.; Sonal Wadhwa, M.D.,; Yan
`Wang, Ph.D.
`Open Public Hearing Speaker:
`None
`
`The following questions were posed to the Committee:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`

`

`CDTL Review
`William M. Boyd, M.D.
`NDA 22-288
`Bepreve (bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution) 1.5%
`
`
`1. Do you think adequate safety and efficacy for bepotastine ophthalmic solution has been
`demonstrated for the treatment of itching due to allergic conjunctivitis?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The committee voted 7-Yes and 0-No.
`
`2. If yes, on which study(ies) are you basing your decision?
`
`All committee members stated they based their decision on Studies ISTA-BEPO-CS01
`CL-S&E-0409071, and CL-SAF-0405071.
`
`3. If no, what additional study(ies) should be performed? Do you have any suggestions regarding
`trial design?
`
`
`Not applicable.
`
`4. Do you have an

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket