throbber

`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NDA 022272/S-040, S-041
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Silver Spring, MD 20993
`
`SUPPLEMENT APPROVAL
`
`
`
`Purdue Pharma LP
`One Stamford Forum
`Stamford, CT 06901-3431
`
`Attention:
`
`Richard Fanelli, PhD
`Head of Regulatory Affairs
`
`
`Dear Dr. Fanelli:
`
`Please refer to the following Supplemental New Drug Applications (sNDAs) dated and received
`March 28, 2018, and June 15, 2018, and your amendments, submitted under section 505(b)of the
`Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) for OXYCONTIN (oxycodone hydrochloride)
`Extended-Release Tablets.
`
`We also refer to our letter dated September 28, 2017, notifying you that under section 505-1 of
`the FDCA, we have determined that your approved Extended-Release and Long-Acting
`(ER/LA) Opioid Analgesics Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) must be modified
`to ensure that training is made available to healthcare providers involved in the treatment and
`monitoring of patients with pain, and to implement the FDA Education Blueprint for Health Care
`Providers Involved in the Treatment and Monitoring of Patients with Pain to ensure the benefits
`of the drugs outweigh the risks of adverse outcomes (addiction, unintentional overdose, and
`death) resulting from inappropriate prescribing, abuse, and misuse.
`
`Finally, we refer to our letter dated June 1, 2018, notifying you, under section 505(o)(4) of the
`FDCA, of new safety information that we believe should be included in the labeling for
`OXYCONTIN. This information pertains to the addition of the REMS program details to product
`labeling for the class of opioid analgesics intended for use in the outpatient setting.
`
`Supplement S-040 provides for the REMS modification required under section 505-1 of the
`FDCA, consistent with our September 28, 2017, letter.
`
`Supplement S-041 provides for revisions to the labeling for OXYCONTIN consistent with our
`June 1, 2018, Safety Labeling Change Notification letter.
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`

`

`NDA 022272/S-040/S-041
`Page 2
`
`
`APPROVAL & LABELING
`
`We have completed our review of these supplemental applications, as amended. They are
`approved, effective on the date of this letter, for use as recommended in the enclosed, agreed-
`upon labeling text.
`
`WAIVER OF HIGHLIGHTS SECTION
`
`Please note that we have previously granted a waiver of the requirements of 21 CFR
`201.57(d)(8) regarding the length of Highlights of prescribing information.
`
`CONTENT OF LABELING
`
`As soon as possible, but no later than 14 days from the date of this letter, submit the content of
`labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format using the FDA
`automated drug registration and listing system (eLIST), as described at
`http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StructuredProductLabeling/default.htm. Content
`of labeling must be identical to the enclosed labeling, with the addition of any labeling changes
`in pending “Changes Being Effected” (CBE) supplements, as well as annual reportable changes
`not included in the enclosed labeling.
`
`Information on submitting SPL files using eList may be found in the guidance for industry titled
`“SPL Standard for Content of Labeling Technical Qs and As” at
`http://www.fda.gov/downloads/DrugsGuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/U
`CM072392.pdf.
`
`The SPL will be accessible from publicly available labeling repositories.
`
`Also within 14 days, amend all pending supplemental applications that include labeling changes
`for this NDA, including CBE supplements for which FDA has not yet issued an action letter,
`with the content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)] in MS Word format, that includes the
`changes approved in this supplemental application, as well as annual reportable changes and
`annotate each change. To facilitate review of your submission, provide a highlighted or marked-
`up copy that shows all changes, as well as a clean Microsoft Word version. The marked-up copy
`should provide appropriate annotations, including supplement number(s) and annual report
`date(s).
`
`We request that the labeling approved today be available on your website within 10 days of
`receipt of this letter.
`
`RISK EVALUATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGY (REMS)
`
`The REMS for Extended-Release and Long-Acting (ER/LA) opioid analgesics products, of
`which OXYCONTIN is a member, was originally approved on July 9, 2012, and the most recent
`REMS modification was approved on May 26, 2017. The REMS consists of a Medication
`Guide, elements to assure safe use, and a timetable for submission of assessments of the REMS.
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`

`

`NDA 022272/S-040/S-041
`Page 3
`
`
`
`In order to ensure the benefits of certain opioid analgesics intended for use in the outpatient
`setting outweigh their risks of adverse outcomes (addiction, unintentional overdose, and death)
`resulting from inappropriate prescribing, abuse, and misuse, we determined that you were
`required to make the REMS modifications outlined in our REMS Modification letter dated
`September 28, 2017.
`
` on March 26,
`Your proposed modified REMS, submitted to Drug Master File (DMF)
`2018, amended and appended to this letter, is approved. The modified REMS consists of a
`Medication Guide, elements to assure safe use, and a timetable for submission of assessments of
`the REMS.
`
`This REMS uses a shared system for the elements to assure safe use and the REMS assessments.
`This shared system, now known as the Opioid Analgesics REMS Program, includes the products
`listed on the FDA REMS website, available at
`https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/rems/index.cfm
`
`Other products may be added in the future if additional NDAs or ANDAs are approved.
`
`The revised REMS assessment plan must include, but is not limited to, the following:
`
`
`1. REMS Outreach and Communication
`
`
`a. For each healthcare provider (e.g., prescriber, pharmacist) to be sent information
`regarding REMS-compliant accredited continuing education (CE), provide the
`date when the letters were sent; the number of letters electronically sent, received,
`undeliverable, and opened; and the number of letters mailed and undeliverable
`
`b. For each professional society, association, and licensing board to be sent
`information regarding REMS-compliant accredited CE, provide the number of
`letters electronically sent, received, undeliverable, and opened; and the number of
`letters mailed and undeliverable
`
`
`
`2. REMS Implementation and Operations
`
`
`a. Status of grants
`
`
`i. The status of the request for proposals for grants for REMS-compliant
`accredited CE including:
`
`
`1. Request for Application (RFA) issued: date and number of
`applications submitted in response to each RFA
`2. RFAs awarded: date, number, and name of grantee
`3. Date/timeframe next RFA to be issued
`
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 022272/S-040/S-041
`Page 4
`
`
`
`ii. The status of the requests for proposals for any grants to CE Providers or
`other CE organizations with expertise in assessing CE outcomes who
`agree to conduct evaluations of health care providers who have taken
`REMS-compliant accredited CE funded under this REMS.
`
`b. Grant review committee
`
`
`i. Individuals from the REMS Program Companies (RPC) reviewing grants
`will include the following clinical licensures: pharmacists, nurses,
`physicians. Additionally there will be involvement by individuals with
`regulatory and pharmacovigilance experience. The job title, licensure and
`professional degree of individuals will be provided for each grant review
`cycle.
`
`ii. Include any external members (non RPC) involved in the grant review,
`including those from the broad-based CE community. Provide the job
`title, licensure and professional degree of the individual for each grant
`review cycle.
`
`c. For CE programs awarded during the assessment period:
`
`
`i. Description of each grantee and projected number of completers
`
`ii. For the first assessment, the date the first program based upon the FDA
`Opioid Analgesic REMS Education Blueprint for Health Care Providers
`Involved in the Treatment and Monitoring of Patients with Pain (“FDA
`Blueprint”), became available
`
`iii. Description of CE program:
`
`1. Level of outcome the activity1 is designed to impact
`2. CE format (live, webinar, etc.)
`3. Duration of activity for live or webinar activities
`4. Average duration to complete for internet/enduring activities
`5. Education methods and tools (case-based, multimedia, didactic,
`interactive, adaptive, etc.)2,3
`
`iv. All reports submitted to the RPC by CE grantees during the assessment
`period.
`
`
`1 Stevenson R, Moore DE. Ascent to the Summit of the CME Pyramid. JAMA 2018;319(6):543-544
`2 Cervero R, Gaines J. The Impact of CME on Physician Performance and Patient Health Outcomes: An Updated
`Synthesis of Systematic Reviews J Contin Educ Health Prof 2015;35(2):131–138
`3 Agency for Research Health and Quality. (2007). Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education. Retrieved May
`9, 2018, from https://archive.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/cme/cme.pdf
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`

`

`NDA 022272/S-040/S-041
`Page 5
`
`
`
`d. Number of participants and completers during the assessment period; provide
`description of learners by standard learner category data4.
`
`e. Independent Audit: The results of independent audits of the CE. Audits must be
`conducted on a random sample of at least 10% of the REMS-compliant accredited
`CE funded under the Opioid Analgesic REMS and must include/evaluate:
`
`
`i. a description of the organization(s) conducting the audit(s)
`
`ii. whether the content of the REMS-compliant accredited CE covers all
`elements of the FDA Opioid Analgesic REMS Education Blueprint for
`Health Care Providers Involved in the Treatment and Monitoring of
`Patients with Pain (“FDA Blueprint”) approved as part of the REMS;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iii. whether the integrated or post-course knowledge assessment measures
`knowledge of all sections of the FDA Opioid Analgesic REMS Education
`Blueprint for Health Care Providers Involved in the Treatment and
`Monitoring of Patients with Pain (“FDA Blueprint”); and
`
`iv. whether the REMS-compliant accredited CE was conducted in accordance
`with the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medication Education
`(ACCME) standards for CE or appropriate standards for accreditation
`bodies
`
`f. Concurrent Educational interventions
`
`
`i. For the year prior to the assessment period through the assessment period,
`provide an evaluation of the overall pain/opioid CE landscape including
`but not limited to:
`
`
`1. States requiring prescribers, pharmacists, or nurses to complete
`opioid or pain management continuing education for
`licensing/renewal of licensing:
`
`
`a. enumeration of these states and their requirements. for
`continuing education on either pain or safe opioid use,
`b. estimates of annual licensed prescribers in those states
`c. which, if any, opioid analgesic or ER/LA Opioid Analgesic
`REMS CE were permissible in which states, for prescribers
`to meet requirements
`
`
`4 Standard Continuing Education (CE) learner data to be captured by all CE Providers for Opioid Analgesic REMS
`includes geographic location (state of primary practice), DEA prescriber status (individual registration or
`institutional authorization), profession, practice area, and length of time in practice.
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`

`

`NDA 022272/S-040/S-041
`Page 6
`
`
`
`2. Health systems, including government (DOD, VA, IHS, etc.), that
`require opioid or pain management continuing education; include
`number of completers if available
`
`3. Any additional available data on continuing education programs
`available during this time with a focus on pharmacological pain
`management or safe opioid use
`
`3. Health Outcomes and/or Surrogates of Health Outcomes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`a. Surveillance and monitoring of data relating to opioid analgesic use, misuse,
`abuse, addiction, overdose, and death. Surveillance data should include the
`following:
`
`
`i. Nationally representative data or data from large stable populations on
`opioid analgesic misuse, abuse, addiction, overdose, and death, to allow
`reliable assessment of national trends and demographic patterns (e.g., age
`group specific rates and trends)
`
`ii. Both overall and drug-specific outcome rates, as available, in each data
`source
`
`iii. Data on trends and patterns of illicit opioid (e.g., heroin) use and related
`morbidity and mortality
`
`b. Evaluation of drug utilization patterns: Nationally-projected data on drug
`utilization trends and patterns, including an evaluation of trends in:
`
`
`i. Dispensing of opioid analgesics subject to the Opioid Analgesic REMS,
`by drug, age group, prescriber specialty
`
`ii. An evaluation of opioid tolerance for products that require patients to be
`opioid tolerant prior to use
`
`iii. An evaluation of concomitant prescribing of gabapentinoids,
`benzodiazepines, and other CNS depressants with opioid analgesics
`
`c. Evaluation of patient experiences around pain management
`
`d. An evaluation of patients’ experiences with acute and chronic pain management
`in various settings: this may include a survey, focus group, or other assessment of
`patient experience, including but not limited to access to coordinated pain
`management care, non-pharmacological options, and judicious and informed
`prescribing of opioids. The evaluation may also include an assessment of negative
`patient experiences, such as perceived overprescribing of opioids, providers’
`refusal to provide care, or forced rapid tapering or discontinuation
`
`

`

`NDA 022272/S-040/S-041
`Page 7
`
`
`
`
`e. Evaluation of prescriber behavior and patient outcomes: The results of an
`evaluation of the effect of REMS-compliant CE on prescriber behavior and
`patient outcomes. This evaluation should include the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`i. Development and use of metrics that assess prescriber behaviors and
`patient outcomes relating to key messages in the FDA Opioid Analgesic
`REMS Education Blueprint for Health Care Providers Involved in the
`Treatment and Monitoring of Patients with Pain (“FDA Blueprint”). The
`assessment should also include an evaluation of potential unintended
`adverse patient outcomes resulting from changes in prescribing practices
`(e.g., withdrawal symptoms or increased pain due to inappropriate rapid
`opioid tapering, patient abandonment, seeking of illicit opioids, suicide
`attempts/completion)
`
`
`ii. Use of an appropriate control group (i.e., providers who have not
`completed REMS-compliant accredited CE), and rigorous control for
`confounding, to allow an assessment of whether any observed changes in
`prescriber behaviors or patient outcomes can be attributed to the CE
`
`4. Knowledge
`
`
`a. Evaluation of CE participants: The results of evaluations to determine the impact
`of REMS-compliant accredited CE on participants’ knowledge, attitudes, and
`self-reported behavior around pain management and appropriate opioid
`prescribing. All evaluations should be representative and generalizable to the
`targeted health care professionals taking the REMS-compliant accredited CE and
`assess understanding of key elements from all sections of the FDA Opioid
`Analgesic REMS Education Blueprint for Health Care Providers Involved in the
`Treatment and Monitoring of Patients with Pain (“FDA Blueprint”). Multiple
`methodologies should be used, including but not limited to the following:
`
`
`i. Pre- and post-activity assessments using validated instruments. These
`assessments could be integrated into live, online, or multimedia formats
`using interactive approaches to enhance the educational value of the
`activity. Different versions or subsets of questions from a standardized
`assessment tool could be employed to cover all key messages and sections
`of the FDA Opioid Analgesic REMS Education Blueprint for Health Care
`Providers Involved in the Treatment and Monitoring of Patients with Pain
`(“FDA Blueprint”), in aggregate, while reducing the time burden for
`individual participants and allowing the assessment to be tailored for
`different types of healthcare professionals.
`
`ii. A long-term follow-up evaluation of participants to assess retention of
`knowledge and skills, application of learning to clinical practice, self-
`reported change in behavior, and barriers to change. Consider
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`

`

`NDA 022272/S-040/S-041
`Page 8
`
`
`
`incentivizing participation in follow-up assessment, for example through
`additional CE credits.
`
`b. Evaluation of Patient Understanding: The results of an evaluation of patients’ and
`caregivers’ understanding of the serious risks of opioid analgesics and their
`understanding of how to use these products safely. This evaluation may include,
`for example, surveys of patients from a representative sample of patients taking
`opioid analgesics with respect to education level, insurance status, and geographic
`location.
`
`5. During transition from the ER/LA Opioid Analgesics REMS to Opioid Analgesic REMS,
`data to be included until the last enduring activity has been reported:
`
`
`a. For each CE activity released under the ER/LA Opioid Analgesics REMS that
`remains active, provide the name of the CE Provider, the title of the activity, and
`the date the activity will expire
`
`b. Aggregate data on participants and completers should be collected using original
`MEMS 2.0 definitions
`
`
`
`
`
`6. Methodologies: A timeline for submission of the assessment protocols, including data
`sources and the methodologies used to conduct all the above described analyses. Each
`assessment report should update the dates of submission for each component of the
`assessment.
`
`The first REMS assessment for the Opioid Analgesic REMS, due 6-months from the date of this
`letter, will include only information outlined in items 1, 2a, 2b, and 2c, and any additional
`information the REMS Program Companies (RPC) deems necessary to describe REMS
`implementation.
`
`The requirements for assessments of an approved REMS under section 505-1(g)(3) include with
`respect to each goal included in the strategy, an assessment of the extent to which the approved
`strategy, including each element of the strategy, is meeting the goal or whether 1 or more such
`goals or such elements should be modified.
`
`We remind you that in addition to the REMS assessments submitted according to the timetable in
`the approved REMS, you must include an adequate rationale to support a proposed REMS
`modification for the addition, modification, or removal of any goal or element of the REMS, as
`described in section 505-1(g)(4) of the FDCA.
`
`We also remind you that you must submit a REMS assessment when you submit a supplemental
`application for a new indication for use, as described in section 505-1(g)(2)(A) of the FDCA.
`This assessment should include:
`
`
`a) An evaluation of how the benefit-risk profile will or will not change with the new
`indication;
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`

`

`NDA 022272/S-040/S-041
`Page 9
`
`
`
`
`b) A determination of the implications of a change in the benefit-risk profile for the current
`REMS;
`
`c) If the new indication for use introduces unexpected risks: A description of those risks
`and an evaluation of whether those risks can be appropriately managed with the currently
`approved REMS.
`
`d) If a REMS assessment was submitted in the 18 months prior to submission of the
`supplemental application for a new indication for use: A statement about whether the
`REMS was meeting its goals at the time of that last assessment and if any modifications
`of the REMS have been proposed since that assessment.
`
`e) If a REMS assessment has not been submitted in the 18 months prior to submission of the
`supplemental application for a new indication for use: Provision of as many of the
`currently listed assessment plan items as is feasible.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`f) If you propose a REMS modification based on a change in the benefit-risk profile or
`because of the new indication of use, submit an adequate rationale to support the
`modification, including: Provision of the reason(s) why the proposed REMS
`modification is necessary, the potential effect on the serious risk(s) for which the REMS
`was required, on patient access to the drug, and/or on the burden on the health care
`delivery system; and other appropriate evidence or data to support the proposed change.
`Additionally, include any changes to the assessment plan necessary to assess the
`proposed modified REMS. If you are not proposing REMS modifications, provide a
`rationale for why the REMS does not need to be modified.
`
`
`If the assessment instruments and methodology for your REMS assessments are not included in
`the REMS supporting document, or if you propose changes to the submitted assessment
`instruments or methodology, you should update the REMS supporting document to include
`specific assessment instrument and methodology information at least 90 days before the
`assessments will be conducted. Updates to the REMS supporting document may be included in a
`new document that references previous REMS supporting document submission(s) for
`unchanged portions. Alternatively, updates may be made by modifying the complete previous
`REMS supporting document, with all changes marked and highlighted. Prominently identify the
`submission containing the assessment instruments and methodology with the following wording
`in bold capital letters at the top of the first page of the submission:
`
`
`NDA 022272 REMS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
`
`
`An authorized generic drug under this NDA must have an approved REMS prior to marketing.
`Should you decide to market, sell, or distribute an authorized generic drug under this NDA,
`contact us to discuss what will be required in the authorized generic drug REMS submission.
`
`We remind you that section 505-1(f)(8) of FDCA prohibits holders of an approved covered
`application with elements to assure safe use from using any element to block or delay approval
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`

`

`NDA 022272/S-040/S-041
`Page 10
`
`
`of an application under section 505(b)(2) or (j). A violation of this provision in 505-1(f) could
`result in enforcement action.
`
`Prominently identify any submission containing the REMS assessments or proposed
`modifications of the REMS with the following wording in bold capital letters at the top of the
`first page of the submission as appropriate:
`
`
`NDA 022272 REMS ASSESSMENT
`
`
`or
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 022272/S-000/
`CHANGES BEING EFFECTED IN 30 DAYS
`PROPOSED MINOR REMS MODIFICATION
`
`
`or
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 022272/S-000/
`PRIOR APPROVAL SUPPLEMENT
`PROPOSED MAJOR REMS MODIFICATION
`
`or
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 022272/S-000/
`PRIOR APPROVAL SUPPLEMENT
`PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATIONS DUE TO SAFETY LABEL CHANGES
`SUBMITTED IN SUPPLEMENT XXX
`
`
`
`or
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT (NEW INDICATION FOR USE)
`FOR NDA 022272/S-000/
`REMS ASSESSMENT
`PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATION (if included)
`
`REMS REVISIONS FOR NDA 022272
`
`
`Should you choose to submit a REMS revision, prominently identify the submission containing
`the REMS revisions with the following wording in bold capital letters at the top of the first page
`of the submission:
`
`
`
`To facilitate review of your submission, we request that you submit your proposed modified
`REMS and other REMS-related materials in Microsoft Word format. If certain documents, such
`as enrollment forms, or website screenshots are only in PDF format, they may be submitted as
`such, but Word format is preferred.
`
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`

`

`NDA 022272/S-040/S-041
`Page 11
`
`
`
`SUBMISSION OF REMS DOCUMENT IN SPL FORMAT
`
`FDA can accept the REMS document in Structured Product Labeling (SPL) format. If you
`intend to submit the REMS document in SPL format, as soon as possible, but no later than 14
`days from the date of this letter, submit the REMS document in SPL format using the FDA
`automated drug registration and listing system (eLIST).
`
`For more information on submitting REMS in SPL format, please email
`FDAREMSwebsite@fda.hhs.gov.
`
`PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS
`
`You may request advisory comments on proposed introductory advertising and promotional
`labeling. To do so, submit the following, in triplicate, (1) a cover letter requesting advisory
`comments, (2) the proposed materials in draft or mock-up form with annotated references, and
`(3) the prescribing information to:
`
`
`OPDP Regulatory Project Manager
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP)
`5901-B Ammendale Road
`Beltsville, MD 20705-1266
`
`
`Alternatively, you may submit a request for advisory comments electronically in eCTD format.
`For more information about submitting promotional materials in eCTD format, see the draft
`Guidance for Industry (available at:
`http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/U
`CM443702.pdf ).
`
`You must submit final promotional materials and prescribing information, accompanied by a
`Form FDA 2253, at the time of initial dissemination or publication [21 CFR 314.81(b)(3)(i)].
`Form FDA 2253 is available at
`http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Forms/UCM083570.pdf.
`Information and Instructions for completing the form can be found at
`http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Forms/UCM375154.pdf. For
`more information about submission of promotional materials to the Office of Prescription Drug
`Promotion (OPDP), see http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDER/ucm090142.htm.
`
`All promotional materials that include representations about your drug product must be promptly
`revised to be consistent with the labeling changes approved in this supplement, including any
`new safety information [21 CFR 314.70(a)(4)]. The revisions in your promotional materials
`should include prominent disclosure of the important new safety information that appears in the
`revised package labeling. Within 7 days of receipt of this letter, submit your statement of intent
`to comply with 21 CFR 314.70(a)(4) to the address above, by fax to 301-847-8444, or
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`

`

`NDA 022272/S-040/S-041
`Page 12
`
`
`electronically in eCTD format. For more information about submitting promotional materials in
`eCTD format, see the draft guidance for industry (available at:
`http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/U
`CM443702.pdf ).
`
`REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA
`(21 CFR 314.80 and 314.81).
`
`If you have any questions, call LCDR Mark A. Liberatore, PharmD, RAC, at (301) 796-2221.
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`Judith A. Racoosin, MD, MPH
`Deputy Director for Safety
`Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia,
` and Addiction Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation II
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`
`
`
`ENCLOSURES:
`Content of Labeling
`Medication Guide
`REMS
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`

`

`Signature Page 1 of 1
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically. Following this are manifestations of any and all
`electronic signatures for this electronic record.
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`------------------------------------------------------------
`
`JUDITH A RACOOSIN
`09/18/2018
`
`Reference ID: 4321305
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket