throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`22-272
`
`
`RISK ASSESSMENT and RISK MITIGATION
`REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Department of Health and Human Services
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology
`
`June 18, 2010
`
`Bob Rappaport, MD, Director
`Division of Anesthesia and Analgesia Products (DAAP)
`
`Mary Willy, MPH, Deputy Director
`Division of Risk Management (DRISK)
`Gita A. Toyserkani, Pharm.D., MBA, Senior Drug Risk
`Management Analyst, Acting TL
`Mary Dempsey BS, Coordinator for Risk Management
`Programs, DRISK
`
`Prior Approval REMS Modification
`
`OxyContin Tablets
`(oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release)
`NDA 022272
`Purdue Pharma L.P.
`2010-1354
`
`Date:
`
`To:
`
`Through:
`
`From:
`
`Subject:
`
`Drug Name(s):
`
`Application Type:
`Applicant/sponsor:
`OSE RCM #:
`
`
`
` 1
`
` Background
`The Division of Anesthesia and Analgesia Products (DAAP) requested that the Division
`of Risk Management (DRISK) review the OxyContin (oxycodone hydrochloride
`controlled-release) tablets Prior Approval REMS Modification Supplement for New Drug
`Application (NDA 022272) submitted by Purdue Pharma L.P. on June 10, 2010. This
`supplemental new drug application provides for revisions to the Training Guide for
`Healthcare Providers, boxed warning, table of contents, references, removal of website
`reference, and upper/lower case text.
`
`

`

`The OxyContin (oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release) tablets REMS was
`approved April 5, 2010 with the following elements:
`• Medication Guide
`• Elements to Assure Safe Use
`o Healthcare provider training
`o Dear Healthcare Professional letter mailed at least three (3) weeks prior to
`first availability of Oxycontin
`o Prescriber re-training every two (2) years
`• Timetable for Submission of Assessment
`
`
`
`
`2 Material Reviewed
`• April 2, 2010 Purdue submitted REMS Supporting Document
`• April 5, 2010 Oxycontin REMS approval
`June 10, 2010 Purdue submitted Prior Approval REMS Modification
`•
`
` 3
`
` Proposed REMS Elements
`The Oxycontin June 10, 2010 submission provides the proposed REMS modification,
`Medication Guide, Dear Healthcare Professional Letter, Healthcare Provider Training
`Guide, and Education Confirmation Form. The REMS Supporting Document is not
`included in this submission. The product is in pre-launch development and not currently
`marketed; therefore, it is reasonable to state that insufficient time has passed since the
`REMS approval to provide a meaningful assessment. The cover letter of the June 10,
`2010 submission states the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`“The approved REMS Supporting Document remains unchanged and is identical
`to the version submitted on April 2, 2010
`
`Herein we are submitting the revised REMS…which include revisions only to the
`Training Guide for Healthcare Providers. In our view, these revisions are minor
`and do not change the content, but rather improve the document quality. For ease
`of review, the revisions are outlined below:
`“(oxycontin hydrochloride controlled release) added to headline page and the
`•
`indication pg 4
`• Boxed warning from approved FPI replaced current version that was
`developed for use in HCP Guide. This ensures that a consistent official black
`box warning is used in the FPI and Training Guide [this is the only one that
`should be in circulation]
`“Full Prescribing “ and Boxed Warning- Uppercased throughout the document
`
`•
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`• Table of Contents (TOC moved to page 3 after black boxed warning, This
`ensures that the TOC precedes the Introduction section, rather than after the
`Introduction where it is currently located
`• Removed reference to website on page 11 as not relevant to section
`• References reordered to be in numerical sequence (previously jumped from #1
`to # 7).”
`
`
`
`
`
` 4
`
` Discussion and Conclusion
`DRISK performed a comparison of the June 10, 2010 submitted proposed REMS and
`Medication Guide to the approved Oxycontin REMS and Medication Guide and found
`then to be identical. The revisions to the Healthcare Provider Training Guide proposed
`by Purdue are acceptable.
`
`
`5. Recommendation
`Approve the REMS modification as submitted June 10, 2010.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Application
`Type/Number
`--------------------
`NDA-22272
`
`Submission
`Type/Number
`--------------------
`SUPPL-5
`
`Submitter Name
`
`Product Name
`
`--------------------
`PURDUE PHARMA
`INC
`
`------------------------------------------
`OXYCONTIN
`
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`MARY J DEMPSEY
`06/18/2010
`
`MARY E WILLY
`06/19/2010
`I concur
`
`

`

`
`
`Department of Health and Human Services
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology
`
`
`
`April 2, 2010
`
`Bob Rappaport, MD, Director
`Division of Anesthesia and Analgesia Products (DAAP)
`Claudia Karwoski, Pharm.D., Director
`Division of Risk Management (DRISK)
`
`Scientific Lead:
`Jeanne Perla, Ph.D., Risk Management Analyst
`
`Team Members:
`DRISK
`Marcia Britt, Ph.D., Health Education Reviewer
`Brian Gordon, MA, Social Science Reviewer
`Sharon Mills, BSN, RN, CCRP, Patient Product Information
`Reviewer Acting Team Leader
`Gita Toyserkani, Pharm.D., MBA, Acting Team Leader
`
`Division of Pharmacovigilance II
`Afrouz Nayernama, Pharm.D., Safety Evaluator
`
`Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis
`Kristina Arnwine, Pharm.D., Safety Evaluator
`
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising and Communication
`Mathilda Fienkeng, Pharm.D., Regulatory Review Officer
`Twyla Thompson, Pharm.D., Regulatory Review Officer
`
`Office of Compliance Division of Risk Management and
`Surveillance
`Agnes Plante, BSN, RN, Consumer Safety Officer
`Review of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS)
`OxyContin® (oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release)
`NDA 22-272
`
`Purdue Pharma Inc
`RCM: 2009-788
`
`
`
`1
`
`Date:
`To:
`
`Thru:
`
`From:
`
`Subject:
`Drug Name(s):
`Application
`Type/Number:
`Applicant/sponsor:
`OSE RCM #:
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`OxyContin® (oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release) is an opioid analgesic with the
`proposed indication for the management of moderate to severe chronic pain when a
`continuous, around-the-clock opioid analgesia is needed for an extended period of time.
`The Sponsor submitted a proposed Risk Minimization Action Plan (RiskMAP) on
`November 29, 2007, during the first review cycle. In accordance with section 505-1 of
`the FDCA, the Agency determined that a REMS is necessary for OxyContin® to ensure
`that the benefits of the drug outweigh the risks of abuse, misuse, and overdose. The
`Sponsor was officially notified of this requirement on June 17, 2009.
`The Agency has been considering REMS elements that should be implemented for a
`number of opioid products, including modified-release opioids, to address the risks of
`abuse, misuse, and overdose. A class REMS for long-acting and high potency opioids is
`also being considered. Until the Agency has determined the elements or possibly a class-
`wide REMS, DAAP with input from OSE, has decided that an interim REMS for long-
`acting and high potency opioids will be required as these products are approved.
`The Sponsor submitted an interim REMS to address the risks of abuse, misuse, overdose,
`and addiction on March 24, 2010. The REMS includes a Medication Guide, Element to
`Assure Safe Use, specifically a plan to ensure Healthcare providers who prescribe
`OxyContin® will receive training under 505-1(f)(3)(A), and a timetable for submission of
`assessment of the REMS. We find the proposed REMS submitted on March 24, 2010, to
`be acceptable.
`Once the elements of the class-wide opioid REMS are determined, the Sponsor will be
`notified to resubmit a REMS incorporating these elements, as was conveyed to the
`Sponsor in the June 17, 2009 Information Request letter.
`
`1 BACKGROUND
`
`1.1 INTRODUCTION
`The proposed indication for OxyContin® is for the management of moderate to severe
`chronic pain in patients requiring continuous, around-the-clock opioid analgesia for an
`extended period of time. OxyContin® tablets are manufactured in 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg,
`30 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg and 80 mg dosage strengths. A single dose of OxyContin® greater
`than 40 mg, or a total daily dose greater than 80 mg are only for use in opioid-tolerant
`patients to avoid fatal respiratory depression. OxyContin® must not be cut, broken,
`chewed, crushed, or dissolved. Doing so can lead to rapid release and absorption of a
`potentially fatal dose of oxycodone. The clinical review of the clinical trials did not
`identify any unexpected adverse events, but did find the typical opioid-related adverse
`events.
`A joint meeting of the Anesthetic and Life Support Drugs Advisory Committee and the
`Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory committee was held on September 24,
`2009. The joint committee was asked to discuss a) whether the studies performed by the
`sponsor adequately characterize the physical attributes of the reformulated OxyContin®
`product, b) whether the change in formulation affects the overall safety profile of
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`OxyContin® and c) whether this application for a reformulated OxyContin® should be
`approved.
`
`The advisory panel consensus was that studies performed by the sponsor did adequately
`characterize the physical attributes of the reformulated OxyContin® product; however,
`many members expressed major concern with the lack of detail in the data presented by
`the sponsor. After discussing the effects of the change in formulation on overall safety,
`fourteen members voted to approve, four members voted not to approve, and one member
`abstained.
`
`1.2 REGULATORY HISTORY
`FDA approved OxyContin® Tablets (NDA 20-553), a controlled-release oral formulation
`of oxycodone hydrochloride on December 12, 1995. Due to the ongoing public health
`concerns indicating abuse and diversion of the current approved formulation of
`OxyContin®, FDA and Purdue discussed the development of an abuse deterrent/abuse
`resistant formulation of OxyContin®.
`The sponsor submitted a RiskMAP on November 29, 2007 with the original NDA
`application for the reformulated OxyContin® product. A Complete Response (CR) letter
`was sent to the Sponsor on October 3, 2008 because the agency had determined that a
`Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) was necessary and in the CR letter a
`detailed description of the required elements of the proposed REMS were provided.
`During the review of this NDA, the Agency was considering implementing a REMS
`across the class of modified-release opioids to address the risks of abuse and overdose
`and use in non-opioid tolerant individuals. Therefore, on December 4, 2008 the sponsor
`was sent a letter requesting that the sponsor not submit a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation
`Strategy (REMS) until the Agency notified the sponsor in writing about the elements
`necessary for a REMS across the class of modified-release opioids and that the Sponsor
`would be notified once that determination was made. .
`
`On June 17, 2009, a General Correspondence Letter was sent to the Sponsor informing
`them that a class REMS for modified-released opioids would be implemented in the
`future. Until such a REMS was approved, Purdue Pharma was to submit a REMS that
`comprised of a Medication Guide, a Communication Plan, and a timetable for submission
`of assessments. The letter stated that once the elements of the class-wide REMS were
`determined, the sponsor would be required to submit a REMS incorporating these
`elements.
`On July 23, 2009 (and amended on September 18, 2009 and November 13, 2009), Purdue
`submitted a proposed REMS in response to the general correspondence letter. After
`reviewing the proposed REMS and upon further consideration, the Agency determined
`that a Medication Guide and communication plan would not be adequate to ensure
`adequate training of healthcare providers to address the risks of abuse, misuse, and
`overdose. Therefore, on December 11, 2009, Purdue was notified that the REMS for
`OxyContin® (oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release) must contain an element to
`assure safe use, specifically healthcare provider training under 505-1(f)(3)(A), to ensure
`that the benefits of OxyContin® (oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release) outweigh
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`the risks. Subsequently, the Sponsor submitted proposed REMS amendments on
`December 21, 2009, February 4, 2010, and March 24, 2010.
`
`2 MATERIAL REVIEWED
`
`2.1 DATA AND INFORMATION SOURCES
`1. General Correspondence Letter sent June 17, 2009
`2. Proposed REMS submitted July 23, 2009
`3. Proposed REMS amendment, submitted September 18, 2009
`4. REMS notification letter sent December 11, 2009
`5. Proposed REMS amendment (in response to REMS notification letter), submitted
`December 21, 2009.
`6. Proposed REMS amendment, submitted February 4, 2010.
`7. Proposed REMS amendment, with final REMS proposal submitted March 24, 2010.
`
`2.2 ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
`
`The submission was reviewed for conformance with Title IX, Subtitle A, Section 901 of
`the Food Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA) and the elements
`outlined in the REMS Notification Letter, as well as responsiveness to comments
`submitted to the Sponsor as part of the ongoing review.
`
`3
`
`RESULTS OF REVIEW
`
`3.1 SAFETY CONCERNS
`Safety concerns identified by the sponsor, DAAP and OSE are the potential for abuse,
`misuse, overdose, and addiction of OxyContin®, as well as the risk of use of OxyContin®
`60 mg and 80 mg tablets, or doses great than 40 mg, in non-opioid-tolerant individuals.
`
`3.2 PROPOSED REMS
`The March 24, 2010 final proposed REMS submission contains the following:
`3.2.1 Goals:
`1. To inform patients and healthcare professionals about the potential for abuse,
` misuse, overdose, and addiction of OxyContin®
`2. To inform patients and healthcare professionals about the safe use of
` OxyContin®
`
`3.2.2 Medication Guide (MG)
`In accordance with 21 CFR 208.24, a Medication Guide will be dispensed with each
`OxyContin® prescription. Purdue Pharma L.P. will ensure that the Medication Guide
`is available for distribution to patients receiving a prescription for OxyContin® by
`providing sufficient numbers to distributors and authorized dispensers.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`1. One copy of Full Prescribing Information, which includes the Medication
`Guide, will be packaged with each bottle of OxyContin®.
`
`2. Two separate additional Medication Guides will also be packaged with each
`bottle of OxyContin®.
`
`
`3. Per 21CFR 208.24(d) the label of each container or package of OxyContin®
`will include a prominent and conspicuous statement:
`
`a) instructing authorized dispensers to provide a Medication Guide to each
`patient to whom the drug is dispensed (eg, “Attention Dispenser:
`Accompanying Medication Guide must be provided to each patient upon
`dispensing”), and
`b) stating how the Medication Guide is provided.
`
`
`
`4. Medication Guides will also be available via Purdue Pharma L.P. Field Sales
`representatives, through an Internet presence, and from Purdue’s Medical
`Services Department (1-888-726-7535).
`3.2.3. Elements to Assure Safe Use
`1. Healthcare providers who prescribe OxyContin® will receive training.
`
`a. Purdue will ensure that training will be provided to healthcare providers who
`prescribe OxyContin®. To become trained, each prescriber will be provided with
`the OxyContin® Educational materials.
`
`The Training includes the following:
`
`i) Proper patient selection;
`
`ii) Appropriate OxyContin® dosing and administration;
`
`iii) General principles of safe opioid use, including information about opioid
`abuse and how to identify patients who are at risk for addiction;
`
`iv) Potential abuse, misuse, overdose and addiction from exposure to opioids,
`including OxyContin®;
`
`v) Risks of OxyContin®, including:
`
`1. The risk of overdose caused by exposure to an essentially immediate-
`release form of oxycodone by consuming broken, chewed, crushed or
`dissolved OxyContin® tablets;
`
`2. The risk of addiction from exposure to OxyContin®; and
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`3. The risk of overdose in patients who have not developed tolerance to the
`sedating or respiratory-depressant effects of opioids from exposure to a
`single dose of OxyContin greater than 40 mg;
`
`vi) Information to counsel patients and caregivers on the need to store opioid
`analgesics safely out of reach of children and household acquaintances and the
`need to properly dispose of unused drugs when no longer needed by the
`patient; and
`
`vii) Importance of providing each patient a Medication Guide with each
`prescription and instructing the patient to read the Medication Guide.
`
`
`
`b. Purdue will ensure that at least 3 weeks prior to first availability of OxyContin® to
`healthcare professionals, a Dear Healthcare Professional letter will be mailed to
`prescribers most experienced in treating chronic pain with opioid agonists,
`including pain specialists, physiatrists, and primary care physicians. This letter is
`designed to convey and reinforce the risks of abuse, misuse, overdose and
`addiction of OxyContin® as well as the need to complete the OxyContin® REMS
`Educational Program. This letter will be available on the Purdue website
`(www.OxyContinrems.com) for 1 year from the date of mailing.
`
`c. The mailings will include the following OxyContin® REMS Educational Program
`materials:
`
`i) OxyContin® Medication Guide
`
`ii) Prescribing OxyContin® Tablets CII: A Guide for Healthcare Providers
`
`iii) OxyContin® Education Confirmation Form
`
`d. Additional printed educational material will be available through field-force
`distribution and by calling the toll-free number at Purdue (1-888-726-7535).
`
`
`e. The educational material will also be available for download at
`www.OxyContinrems.com.
`
`f. Purdue will maintain a list of all prescribers who have completed the OxyContin®
`REMS Educational Program.
`
`Prescribers will be re-trained every two years or following substantial changes to the
`OxyContin® REMS. Substantial changes may include changes in the OxyContin®
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`Full Prescribing Information, OxyContin® Medication Guide, or OxyContin® REMS
`that require substantial modification of the educational materials.
`
`The following materials are part of the REMS and are appended:
`o Dear Healthcare Professional Letter
`o Medication Guide
`o The Healthcare Provider Guide, “Prescribing OxyContin® Tablets CII: A
`Training Guide for Healthcare Providers”
`o OxyContin® Education Confirmation Form
`
`Reviewer comment:
`The Sponsor requested that the mailing date of the DHCP letter be closer to the date of
`first shipment [i.e., approximately three weeks prior to first shipment], rather than “within
`60 days of approval” as was specified in the March 18, 2010 Discipline Review (DR)
`letter. DRISK consulted the Office of Compliance (OC) and they agreed to the alternate
`timeframe closer to launch but requested that the date of shipment of the DHCP
`letter/Educational materials and the number of mailings be included in the information
`needed for assessments.
`
`3.2.4 Implementation System
`Because OxyContin® can be approved without the Elements to Assure Safe Use
`described under FDCA 505-1(f)(3) (B), (C), and (D) of the Act, an implementation
`system is not required.
`
`3.2.5. Timetable for Submission of Assessments
`
`Purdue Pharma L.P. will submit REMS Assessments to FDA every 6 months for the first
`year from the date of approval of the REMS and annually thereafter. To facilitate
`inclusion of as much information as possible, while allowing reasonable time to prepare
`the submission, the reporting interval covered by each assessment will conclude no
`earlier than 60 days before the submission date for that assessment. Purdue L.P. will
`submit each assessment so that it will be received by the FDA on or before the due date.
`The REMS Assessment Plan was summarized in the REMS Supporting Document and
`will be included in the approval letter. As part of the negotiations of the final OxyContin
`REMS, comments came from Office of Compliance regarding the information needed for
`Assessments and requested to include the date of the shipment of the DHCL letter and the
`number of mailings. The information needed for assessment will include at a minimum:
`
`
`1. An evaluation of patients’ understanding of the serious risks of OxyContin®.
`
`2. A report on periodic assessments of the distribution and dispensing of the
`Medication Guide in accordance with 21 CFR 208.24.
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
`3. A report on failures to adhere to distribution and dispensing requirements, and
`corrective actions taken to address noncompliance.
`
`4. A report on the status of the training program for healthcare providers
`including the number of Dear Healthcare Professional letters mailed to each
`specialty identified in the REMS, when the letters were mailed, and what
`information was included in the mailings.
`
`
`5. An evaluation of healthcare providers’ awareness and understanding of the
`serious risks associated with OxyContin® (for example, through surveys of
`healthcare providers).
`
`
`6. Specification of measures that would be taken to increase awareness if
`surveys of healthcare providers indicate that healthcare provider awareness is
`not adequate.
`
`7. An analysis and summary of surveillance and monitoring activities for abuse,
`misuse, overdose, and addiction and any intervention taken resulting from
`signals of abuse, misuse, overdose, and addiction.
`
`
`8. A claims study to evaluate OxyContin® (oxycodone hydrochloride) utilization
`patterns including opioid-tolerant utilization patterns before and after
`implementation of the REMS.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9. With respect to REMS goals, an assessment of the extent to which the
` elements to assure safe use are meeting the goals or whether the goals or such
` elements should be modified.
`
`Reviewer comments:
`The Sponsor did not submit the survey instruments or methodologies. Without the
`survey instruments and methodologies there is insufficient information to complete a
`review of the patient and prescriber surveys. The Sponsor was informed on March 18,
`2010 in a DR letter to submit for review the detailed plans that will be used to evaluate
`patients’, prescribers’, and pharmacists’ understanding about the risks associated with
`and safe use of OxyContin® at least 90 days before the evaluation will be conducted. The
`submission should include all methodology and instruments that will be used to evaluate
`the knowledge about the risks associated with and safe use of OxyContin®.
`
`Upon further review it was determined that a pharmacist survey is not necessary as the
`target audience for the mailing and educational materials includes only prescribers.
`Please convey to the Sponsor that a pharmacist survey will not be necessary and refer
`them to the revised comments on the survey methodology (Appendix A).
`
` 4
`
` DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
`An interim REMS will be implemented by the Sponsor until a class-wide opioid REMS
`has been approved. The proposed REMS dated March 24, 2010 contains the required
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`REMS elements which includes a Medication Guide, element to assure safe use, and a
`timetable for submission of assessments.
`
`The REMS Supporting Document outlines the information that the Sponsor will use to
`assess the effectiveness of the REMS in meeting the goals. The Sponsor did not submit
`the patient and prescriber survey instruments or methodologies; however, this
`information does not need to be submitted for FDA review prior to approval of the
`REMS. The DR letter of March 18, 2010 indicated that the Sponsor must submit for
`review the detailed plans that will be used to evaluate patients’, prescribers’, and
`pharmacists’ understanding about the risks associated with and safe use of OxyContin® at
`least 90 days before the evaluation will be conducted. Please convey to the Sponsor that a
`pharmacist survey will not be necessary and to refer them to the revised comments on the
`surveys (Appendix 1). Please consult DRISK request once the survey instruments and
`methodologies have been submitted by the Sponsor.
`
`Based on our current understanding of the risks of OxyContin®, DRISK believes that a
`REMS comprised of these components is appropriate until a class-wide opioid REMS is
`established.
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`Appendix A: Revised Comments on Survey Methodology and Instruments
`
`
`Submit for review the detailed plan that will be used to evaluate patients’ and
`prescribers’ understanding about the safe use of OxyContin®. The proposed plan
`does not need to be submitted for FDA review prior to approval of the REMS,
`however it should be submitted at least 90 days before the evaluation will be
`conducted. The submission should be coded “REMS Correspondence.” The
`submission should include all methodology and instruments that will be used to
`evaluate the knowledge about the risks associated with and safe use of OxyContin®.
`1. We encourage you to recruit respondents using a multi-modal approach. For
`example, respondents could be recruited online, through physicians’ offices,
`through pharmacies, managed care providers, or through consumer panels.
`Explain how often non-respondent follow-up or reminders will be completed, and
`the planned frequency.
`Explain how an incentive or honorarium will be offered, and the intended amount.
`Explain how any recruitment sites will be selected.
`Submit for review any recruitment advertisements.
`2. Define the sample size and confidence associated with that sample size.
`3. Define the expected number of people to be surveyed, and how the sample will be
`determined (selection criteria).
`4. Explain the inclusion criteria for patients and prescribers; that is, who is an
`eligible respondent. For example, patient respondents might be:
`• Age 18 or older
`• Currently taking OxyContin® or have taken in past 3 months
`• Not currently participating in a clinical trial involving OxyContin®
`• Not a healthcare provider
`Submit any screener instruments, and describe if any quotas of sub-populations
`will be used.
`5. Explain how often surveys will be administered, and the intended frequency.
`Offer respondents multiple options for completing the survey. This is especially
`important for inclusion of the lower literacy population. For example, surveys
`could be completed online or through email, in writing or by mail, over the phone,
`and in person.
`Explain how surveyors will be trained.
`6. Explain controls used to compensate for the limitations or bias associated with the
`methodology.
`7. The sample should be demographically representative of the population who use
`the drug (patients), or prescribe the drug (doctors).
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
`8. If possible and appropriate, sample should be diverse in terms of: age, race,
`ethnicity, sex, socio-economic status, education level, geographically.
`9. Submit for review the introductory text that will be used to inform respondents
`about the purpose of the survey.
`Potential respondents should be told that their answers will not affect their ability
`to receive or take (patients), prescribe (doctors), and that their answers and
`personal information will be kept confidential and anonymous.
`10. Respondents should not be eligible for more than one wave of the survey.
`11. Results should be analyzed on an item-by-item or variable-by-variable basis. The
`data may be presented using descriptive statistics, such as sample size, mean,
`standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum (for continuous variables),
`and frequency distributions (for categorical variables).
`Data may be stratified by any relevant demographic variable, and presented in
`aggregate. Submit with your assessments all methodology and instruments that
`were utilized.
`Regarding an assessment of patients’ knowledge:
`12. The assessment is to evaluate the effectiveness of the REMS in achieving the goal
`by evaluating patients’ knowledge of the serious risks associated with use of the
`drug; the assessment is not to evaluate consumer comprehension of the
`Medication Guide.
`Other than when the patient received the Medication Guide at the time the
`prescription was filled/dispensed, respondents should not be offered an
`opportunity to read or see the Medication Guide, Package Insert, or any other
`related educational materials again prior to taking the survey.
`13. Submit for review the survey instruments (questionnaires and/or moderator’s
`guide), including any background information on testing survey questions and
`correlation to the messages in the Medication Guide.
`14. The patient knowledge survey should include a section with questions asking
`about the specific risks or safety information conveyed in the Medication Guide to
`see if the patient not only understands the information, but knows what to do if
`they experience the event.
`Most of the risk-specific questions should be derived from information located in
`the “What is the Most Important Information I should know about OxyContin®?”
`section of the Medication Guide.
`The risk-specific questions should be non-biased, non-leading, multiple choice
`questions with the instruction to “select all that apply.” Each question should
`have an “I don’t know” answer option.
`The order of the multiple choice responses should be randomized on each survey.
`15. The order of the patient questions should be such that the risk-specific questions
`are asked first, followed by questions about receipt of the Medication Guide.
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`
`Demographic questions should be collected last or as part of any screener
`questions.
`Respondents should not have the opportunity or ability to go back to previous
`questions in the survey.
`Explain if and when any education will be offered for incorrect responses.
`16. Include questions about receipt of the Medication Guide in the patient survey as a
`way to fulfill the obligation to report on the distribution of the Medication Guide.
`17. Just prior to the questions about receipt of the Medication Guide, include text that
`describes a Medication Guide. For example,
`Now we are going to ask you some questions about the Medication Guide you
`may have received with OxyContin®. The Medication Guide is a paper handout
`that contains important information about the risks associated with use of
`OxyContin® and how to use OxyContin® safely. Medication Guides always
`include the title “Medication Guide”.
`18. Use the following (or similar) questions to assess receipt and use of the
`Medication Guide.
`• Who gave you the Medication Guide for OxyContin®? (Select all that apply)
`• My doctor or someone in my doctor’s office
`• My pharmacist or someone at the pharmacy
`• Someone else - please explain: ___________________________
`I did not get a Medication Guide for OxyContin®
`•
`• Did you read the Medication Guide?
`• All,
`• Most,
`• Some,
`• None
`• Did you understand what you read in the Medication Guide?
`• All,
`• Most,
`• Some,
`• None
`• Did someone offer to explain to you the information in the Medication Guide?
`• Yes, my doctor or someone in my doctor’s office
`• Yes, my pharmacist or someone at the pharmacy
`• Yes, someone else – please explain:
`______________________________
`• No
`• Did you accept the offer? Yes or No
`• Did you understand the explanation that was given to you?
`• All,
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`• Most,
`• Some,
`• None
`
`• Did or do you have any questions about the Medication Guide? Yes or No (If
`Yes, list your question(s) below) Note: This is an open text field that should
`be grouped/coded by the sponsor prior to submitting to FDA
`Regarding an assessment of healthcare providers’ (prescribers) knowledge:
`19. The assessment is to evaluate the effectiveness of the REMS in achieving the goal
`by evaluating healthcare providers’ knowledge of: the serious risks associated
`with use of OxyContin®, how to properly prescribe OxyContin®, and how to how
`to properly monitor for the serious risks associated with the use of OxyContin®;
`th

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket