throbber
Clinical Review
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`
`Treanda (bendamustine)
`
`consists of individual reports, a report of a 398 patient postmarketing study, and an Overall
`Safety Update Report (SUR). According to Astellas, approximately .1 patients were
`exposed to bendamustine during this time period. Reliance on postmarketing reports for
`estimation of adverse reaction incidence and severity is limited due to the passive nature of the
`collection of spontaneous reports, the voluntary nature of reporting, the insufficient detail
`contained in these reports, and difficulty calculating event rates due to the relatively unknown
`safety population denominator.
`
`Demographics
`
`The demographics presented below in Table 7-6 are from the major study used for the safety
`analysis (02CLLIII). All patients had histologically—confirrned chronic B-cell lymphocytic
`leukemia and symptomatic Binet stage B or Binet stage C disease. Patients were predominantly
`men (62% vs. 38%), with an average age of 63.3 years, exactly half were less than 65 years of
`age versus 265 years of age. In study 02CCLLIII, patients in each treatment group were well-
`matched for age, gender, race, and body height. The data in Table 7-6 below were confirmed
`using the raw datasets provided by the Applicant in the application.
`
`Table 7-6 Demographic Information (Treated Analysis Set; Applicant Table)
`
`Total
`Bendnnmslinc Chlommbmfl
`Demographic Information
`.\'=30|
`N=153)
`.\‘=l48
`Variable/Stalhlk
`
`Age, (years)
`Mm
`63.0
`63.6
`63.3
`so
`763
`8.6:
`$15
`Median
`63.0
`66.0
`64.0
`Min. max
`45.0. 77.0
`53.0. 78.0
`38.0. 78.0
`.-\ge grou
`7- 65 yen];
`265 yms
`Sex. n (”M
`Men
`Women
`Race. 11 (“/0)
`01th
`mm:
`Weight (kg)
`“
`Menu
`Median
`SD
`Min. max
`"eight (em)
`11
`Mm
`31)
`Median
`Min. max
`SOURCE: Summary 15.3]. Listing 4.
`’ Race for paxicm lOSlé in the chlommbucil treatment group 11m not specified.
`Mineminimum: nnwnwtimmm SD=xumdard deviation.
`
`DU
`(D
`a,~0-
`1
`0
`(5
`m
`—'
`9:
`(D
`
`0
`0
`'0
`<
`
`151 (so)
`150(50)
`187 (62)
`114 (38)
`
`ll'~|)
`500099)
`
`397
`76. 1
`750
`14.35
`48.3, 133.0
`298
`103.7
`8.80
`1690
`“7.0. l‘)0.0
`
`s: (54)
`71 (46)
`97 (63)
`56 (37)
`
`69 (47)
`79 (53)
`90 (61)
`58 (39)
`
`0
`153 (100)
`
`l(<‘l)
`147 ( >99)
`
`15:
`78.:
`77 4
`15.06
`50.0. 133.0
`153
`169.0
`8.60
`170.0
`147.0. 190.0
`
`HS
`74.0
`72.0
`13.26
`43.8. 11s.0
`145
`163.4
`9.04
`mm
`149.0. 189.0
`
`Data in above table was confirmed by review of raw and derived datasets and CRFs.
`
`75
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`
`Treanda (bendamustine)
`
`:Rev1ewerComments The bendamustmeand chlorambucfltreatmentgroups appearto ;
`Elbewell-balancedfordemographlc cr1ter1athat Could potentlallyimpactthesafety analys1s
`forbendamustme Age genderand welght didnotSignlficantlyvarybetweengroups
`:1 An insufficwntnumber ofnon-cauca31an patlents were enrolled to addresspotentlal
`.lmpactsuponrace
`,
`-
`.
`-
`~
`,
`--
`9"
`'
`1 " '
`' The demograph1cs ofthlsstudy populatlon maynotmirror thoseofthe potent1al
`populat1onWho Will be treatedWithbendamustineafter itsmarketlng approval111that
`.-Treandamay be reserved for prev1ouslytreatedpatients TheproposeddOSeandschedule
`in this appllcat1on18 supportedbythedoseand schedulestudied1ntrial 02CLLIII The
`study demgnallowed continuedtreatment until1ntolerabletox1c1ty, progresswnof disease,
`.- 0r.1nvest1gatordecision. The mediannumber of Cycles recelved1nbOthgroupswas six
`3 Thetyp1cal experlenceWithpurine analogs totreat CLL1s also with six courses -.
`-
`1
`
`i
`
`7.2.2 Explorations for Dose Response
`
`The Applicant did not perform a study comparing different doses of bendamustine. Therefore,
`and exploration for dose response could not be performed. Overall, the application submitted
`does contain adeczluate numbers of patients in the proposed population of CLL, at the proposed
`dose (100 mg/ m ), and schedule. Additionally, the patients in both treatment groups appear to
`have been exposed to similar doses and exposures of the respective agents.
`
`7.2.3 Special Animal and/or In Vitro Testing
`
`Reprotoxicity
`Development and reproductive toxicology studies were performed in mice and rats. These
`studies were non-GLP and are considered to be supportive, although reproductive toxicity is
`expected for any alkylating agent. Other nonclinical toxicology studies conducted with
`bendamustine were local tolerance studies in rabbits (GLP) and immunotoxicity studies in mice
`and human peripheral blood lymphocytes (non-GLP).
`
`QT Prolongation
`Safety pharmacology studies conducted with bendamustine included in Vitro evaluations of
`action potential duration using Beagle dog Purkinje fibers, an in Vitro assessment of hERG
`channel current, and an assessment of renal function in the Sprague-Dawley rat. The study to
`evaluate the effects of bendamustine on the action potential duration in dog Purkinje fibers and
`the study to assess potential effects on renal fimction in rats were conducted by \
`IN GLP). The study to assess bendamustine on hERG
`
`According to the Applicant:
`Beflddmuyime lad 120 efleci i/z Vii/'0 0/2 dog Pit/”mm? fléer arc/1'01:
`pate/21mlparame/e/o; i/zclzzm'flg amplitude, res/mgpate/71ml maximal
`
`76
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`
`Treanda (bendamustine)
`
`4120’ 467le pole/marl dam/[[072 fifldéf éotfl
`rate of depo/drl'Zd/z'o/I,
`120/7724] {60 ppm) and 1/014» {20 ppm] .s'lz'lrzz/la/z'wz rate; over a
`colzce/z/ra/z’o/z marge (f [f [0 2f ,ag/ml.
`[12 an 1'12 VIZ/’0 J/uafi/ to
`era/”ate [fie pate/zlzfi/ effect; of éefldamzutz'ize 0/2 flE/i’G céa/me/
`cur/em; a coflcefltrdtzbiz 0/2 ,ag/ml flaa’ 120 efflc/ 0/2 flEA’G cfla/me/
`cur/rem: Wflfle tartan/ratio}: 0/20 flg/ML 4724’ 200 ,a/I/ flaa’ a dare-
`depe/zde/z/ I'lzézb/tz'wz offlE/l’é' cfla/me/ Gil/7’67” raflgz'izgfl'om 20% [0
`6f%,
`raved/112642 Based 1400/1
`[fie rem/[23’ of flare 1'11 VIZ/0
`caraf’omyczz/ar
`54/641
`péarmaco/og/
`”yaks;
`éeim’amzm‘iize
`dem0”J/rd/€d a law dr/fiy/é/flage/zl'c rzirk at conce/z/ralz'o/zy Mal are
`eqw'm/eiz/ to, or J/Igfllljlgrea/er Mali [flare éez'lzg oéye/vea’1'12palm/713".
`
`Rev1ewerCOmmentsz. The non-cliniCaltestingofbendamuStine appears adequateto I
`explore potentlaladverse reaCtions. The reader1s referredto the PharmTox review for
`
`further detalls ofthe non-cllnlcaltesting forbendamustlne
`
`H
`
`7.2.4 Routine Clinical Testing
`
`Rewewer Comment: The clinicalevaluations of.trialpart1c1pantswere adequate to assess
`expected and unexpectedadverse reactionsin the CLL populat1on
`'
`-
`
`'
`
`7.2.5 Metabolic, Clearance, and Interaction Workup
`
`The reader is referred to Section 4.4 (Clinical Pharmacology). In vitro data suggest that plasma
`protein binding was approximately 95%, with albumin being the main binding protein at
`therapeutic plasma concentrations. In vitro data suggest that bendamustineIS not likely to
`displace or be displaced by other highly protein--bound drugs.
`
`Bendamustine is primarily metabolized by hydrolysis to the relatively inactive metabolites,
`monohydroxy bendamustine (HPl) and dihydroxy bendamustine (HP2). The active metabolites
`of bendamustine (.-hydroxybendamustine [M3] and N-des-methylbendamustine [M4]) are
`formed primarily via cytochrome (CYP) P450 system CYP1A2. However, both metabolites are
`present in low concentrations relative to the parent. In vitro data suggest that P-glycoprotein,
`BCRP, and/or other efflux transporters may have a role in bendamustine transport. Based on in
`vitro data, bendamustine is not likely to inhibit human CYP isoenzymes 1A2, 2C9/10, 2D6, 2E1,
`or 3A4/5. In addition, in vitro data indicate that bendamustine is not likely to induce substrates of
`CYP enzymes.
`
`77
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`
`Treanda‘ (bendamustine)
`
`There was no formal clinical pharmacology study conducted to specifically evaluate the effects
`of race, sex, or age on the pharmacokinetics of bendamustine. A cross-study comparison of the
`bendamustine exposures from study SDX-105-03 (7 Caucasians, 1 Other) and study 2006001 (6
`Japanese subjects) indicate that exposures in Japanese patients were slightly higher (20%) than
`those see in the Caucasian subjects. However, because of the limited number of patients, no
`conclusions can be drawn. More data are required to make definitive recommendations.
`
`7.2.6 Evaluation for Potential Adverse Reactions for Similar Drugs in Drug Class
`
`Class effects typically seen with alkylating agents include nausea, vomiting, and
`myelosuppression. These effects were properly evaluated in study 02CLLIII and were some of
`the most commonly seen toxicities.
`
`’Rev1ewer Comments The Applicant’s effortsto detect class-speelficadversereaCtions
`were adequate forthe indication sought. Pre-clinical testingindicated that bendathine _'
`*w1ll not likelylead to QTprolongatlon Thesponsorhas not conductedadequatecliniCal.
`analyses to assess thispetentialin humans per ICHguldelmes This evaluatlonshouldbe
`requested as a post-marketmg Commitment.
`
`'
`
`7.3.1 Deaths
`
`Thirty-four deaths occurred during the conduct of study 02CLLIII. An equal number (17) of
`deaths occurred in each treatment group. Seventy-one percent of deaths in both groups occurred
`more than 100 days after the last study drug dose. The most common attribution for death was
`progression of disease (41% of patients in each group). Four patients died during the treatment
`phase of the study or within 30 days of the last study drug dose, one patient in the bendamustine
`group (patient 10303) and three patients in the chlorambucil group (patients 10114, 10902, and
`20902). The Applicant provided the reported cause of death for these four patients. A review of
`the death narratives and eCRFs was undertaken to evaluate the attributions of these deaths. A
`
`description of the information reviewed about each event are provided below.
`
`Deaths Within 30 days of Last Study Drug Treatment
`The section below provides the verbatim patient narratives for deaths provided by the Applicant.
`
`Bendamustine Group
`
`Patient 10303: Patient was a 69-year-old, white man with symptomatic Binet stage B, chronic
`lymphocytic leukemia. Significant medical history included chronic obstructive pulmonary
`disease (COPD) and pleural effusion, which was reported as grade 3 at baseline. On Cycle 1,
`Day 1, the patient experienced an adverse event of grade 1 pleural effusion and a thoracocentesis
`
`78
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`Treanda (bendamustine)
`
`procedure was performed the same day. On day 15, the pleural effusion was reported as a serious
`adverse event of grade 3 severity. In addition, on day 15, he experienced non-serious adverse
`reactions of grade 3 respiratory failure, dyspnea, and hypoxia, and results of an
`electrocardiogram noted a grade 2 supraventricular arrhythmia. The pleural effiision, respiratory
`failure, dyspnea, and hypoxia all required hospitalization, and the patient was treated with
`corticosteroids for systemic use and oxygen. On day 18, cefipime was added to the patient’s
`treatment regimen and all of the events continued. Subsequently, on day 19, the pleural effusion,
`respiratory failure, dyspnea, and hypoxia all increased in severity to grade 4, and a second
`thoracocentesis was performed. On day 20 (19 days after last dose of study drug), the patient
`died due to pleural effusion, respiratory failure, dyspnea, and hypoxia as a consequence of
`underlying COPD. All of the events reported for this patient were considered unrelated to study
`drug treatment by the investigator.
`
`Adverse Reaction(s) Leading to Death: Pleural effiision, respiratory failure-dyspnea, hypoxia
`
`Chlorambucil Group
`
`Patient 10114: Patient was a 47-year-old, white woman with symptomatic Binet stage C,
`chronic lymphocytic leukemia. On Cycle 1, Day 22, the patient had an adverse reaction of grade
`2 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC]: 1.485 x 109/L), which was considered possibly
`related to study drug treatment by the investigator and continued. On day 27, she experienced
`grade 3 cough and grade 4 pyrexia (reported as non-serious adverse reactions) and was
`diagnosed with a serious adverse reaction of grade 4 bacterial pneumonia the same day. In
`addition, on day 27, the patient also experienced a non-serious adverse reaction of grade 3 rash.
`The patient was hospitalized due to the bacterial pneumonia, cough, pyrexia, and rash, and she
`was treated with cefiriaxone sodium, amikacin sulfate, ciprofloxacin, human albumin, digoxin,
`oxygen, and meropenem for the bacterial pneumonia. On day 29 (14 days after last dose of study
`drug), the patient died due to massive bacterial pneumonia, as a result of treatment for chronic
`lymphocytic leukemia. The bacterial pneumonia and rash were considered possibly related to
`study drug treatment by the investigator and the cough and pyrexia were considered unrelated to
`study drug treatment.
`
`Adverse Reaction(s) Leading to Death: Neutropenia,’ pneumonia bacterial, cough, pyrexia, rash
`
`Patient 10902: Patient was a 67-year—old, white woman with asymptomatic Binet stage B,
`chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Significant medical history included heart failure and right plural
`effusion. On day 76, she experienced a serious adverse reaction of grade 1 hemorrhage, which
`resulted in hospitalization; also on day 76, she had non-serious adverse reactions of grade 4
`thrombocytopenia (platelets: 90 x 109/L), grade 2 blood lactate dehydrogenase increased (LDH:
`1054 u/L), and grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia (bilirubin: 87.1 umol/L). The patient was treated with
`hydrocortisone and methylprednisolone for the thrombocytopenia, and received platelets. The
`hemorrhage was considered possibly related; the thrombocytopenia was considered unrelated;
`and the elevated LDH and hyperbilirubinemia were considered unlikely related to study drug
`treatment by the investigator. On day 81, the severity of the hemorrhage increased to grade 3;
`
`79
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`
`Treanda (bendamustine)
`
`and the severity of the elevated LDH decreased to grade 1; the severity of the hyperbilirubinemia
`decreased to grade 2; and the thrombocytopenia was ongoing. That same day (day 81), the
`patient also had a grade 2 adverse reaction of anemia, which was ongoing and considered
`unrelated to study drug treatment by the investigator. On day 84, the severity of the hemorrhage
`increased to grade 4, and the patient subsequently died on day 88 (17 days after last dose of
`study drug) due to the hemorrhage. The grade 4 hemorrhage was considered possibly related to
`study drug treatment by the investigator.
`
`Adverse Reaction(s) Leading to Death: Hemorrhage
`
`Patient 20902: Patient was a 63-year-old, white man with asymptomatic Binet stage C, chronic
`lymphocytic leukemia. Significant medical history included diabetes mellitus, myocardial
`ischemia, pneumonitis related to tumor infiltration, and heart failure. Prior to the study and
`concomitantly, the patient took allopurinol for prevention of hyperuricemia, furosemide and
`metildigoxin for heart failure, and isosorbide dinitrate for chronic cardiac ischemia. On day 29,
`the patient had nonserious adverse reactions of grade 3 anemia (hemoglobin: 77 g/L) and grade 2
`respiratory tract infection. The patient received red blood cells for the anemia, and midecamycin,
`ciprofloxacin, and ambroxol hydrochloride for the respiratory tract infection. On day 35, the
`patient experienced the serious adverse reaction of grade 3 cardiac failure, which resulted in
`hospitalization and for which the patient continued concomitant treatment with furosemide and
`metildigoxin. In addition, on day 35, the patient experienced the non-serious adverse reaction of
`grade 3 dyspnea, for which he was treated with concentrated oxygen and methylprednisolone.
`The respiratory tract infection was noted as having resolved on day 36 and the anemia, dyspnea,
`and cardiac failure continued until the patient’s death on day 37 (8 days afier last dose of study
`drug), which was due to all 4 of these events. With the exception of respiratory tract infection,
`which was considered unlikely related to study drug treatment by the investigator, all of these
`events were considered unrelated to study drug treatment.
`
`Adverse Reaction(s) Leading to Death: Anemia, respiratory tract infection, dyspnea, cardiac
`failure
`
`Neither narratives nor case report forms were provided for patients who died more than 30 days
`after study drug treatment. Therefore, the data on attribution of death could not be confirmed. In
`the bendamustine group, 2 (possibly 3) patients died from cardiac causes (10401, 20204, and
`23601). None of these three patients had any baseline medical conditions recorded in the
`medical history datasets that might increase the risk of such events. However, the concomitant
`medication datasets contained some medications used that could potentially be related to a
`history of cardiac disease. Patient 10401 was receiving amiodarone at baseline for a history of
`supraventricular arrhythmia. Patient 20204 was taking nifedipine for arterial hypertension at
`baseline and while on study. Patient 23601 was not recorded as taking any baseline medications
`that could be linked to cardiac death. The attribution cannot be clearly made to bendamustine
`because the patients were at increased risk of such events due to age (6th decade of life) and the
`lack of a close temporal relationship between bendamustine and the fatal event.
`
`80
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`
`Treanda (bendamustine)
`
`Threepatients (10102, 11001, & 20701) died of cerebrovascular events which are also increased
`in this age group. None of these three patients had any baseline medical conditions recorded that
`might increase the risk of such events. However, patient 11001 was recorded as taking
`nifedipine for arterial hypertension before the study began. Neither patient 10102 or 20701 were
`recorded as having used any medication at baseline that would indicate and increased risk of
`cerebrovascular events. The lack of temporal relationship to the study drug and the event makes
`an attribution to bendamustine less likely.
`
`_
`,
`.
`I'Rev1ewerSummary ofFatalEventsWithin30 DaysofTreatment
`'
`. Threepatientsdied within 30 days ofstudy drugin the chlorammieiltreatmentgroupas '
`comparedto 1inthe bendamustine group. Theonly patient in-the bendamustine treatment
`group to die.Within30 days oftreatment appearedto diefrom abaseline (non-cancer) medical
`condition The narrative-indicates thatthe patient wasmedically decompensatmg secondary
`to his baseline grade 3 pleuraleffusionson the first dayOftreatment. It15probablethatthis ,
`patient should haVe beenexcludedfiom trialeligibilitydue to an unstable medical condition
`Thisdeath1s notlikelytoberelatedto bendamustine therapy
`'
`>
`
`2
`
`.
`
`'
`
`7.3.2 Nonfatal Serious Adverse Reactions
`
`Severe (Grade 3-4) Adverse Reactions
`Eighty-eight (58%) patients in the bendamustine treatment group and 44 (31%) patients in the
`chlorambucil treatment group reported at least one grade 3 or 4 adverse reaction. Both grade 3
`and 4 adverse reactions occurred more frequently in the bendamustine treatment group than in
`the chlorambucil treatment group. Grade 3 events were reported in 33% of the bendamustine
`patients as compared to 22% in the chlorambucil patients. Grade 4 events were reported in 25%
`of patients in the bendamustine group as compared to 8% of patients in the chlorambucil group.
`The most common severe adverse reactions in the bendamustine treatment group by System
`Organ Class in the bendamustine treatment group were blood and lymphatic system disorders
`(41%), infections and infestations (7%), general disorders and administrative site conditions
`(5%), and vascular disorders (5%).
`
`Grade 3/ 4 hematologic adverse reactions with a frequency greater than 10% in the bendamustine
`treatment group were neutropenia (24%), leukopenia (15%), and thrombocytopenia (13%).
`Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse reactions were reported by 52 (34%) patients in the
`bendamustine treatment group and 25 (17%) patients in the chlorambucil treatment group. Grade
`3/ 4 non-hematologic adverse reactions with a frequency greater than 1% in the bendamustine
`treatment group were pyrexia (4%), pneumonia (3%), rash (3%), hypertension (3%),
`hypertensive crisis (2%), hyperuricemia (2%), and infection (2%). Five patients (3%) in the
`bendamustine treatment group experienced febrile neutropenia compared with none in the
`chlorambucil group. Neutropenic infection occurred in 10 bendamustine patients compared with
`1 in the chlorambucil group. There were 2 events of grade 3 sepsis, both in patients in the
`bendamustine treatment group. Both patients recovered. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse reactions
`
`81
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`.
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`
`Treanda (bendamustine)
`
`with a frequency greater than 5% in the chlorambucil treatment group were neutropenia (9%)
`and thrombocytopenia (8%) (Table 7-7).
`
`Table 7-7 Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Reactions Occurring in Either Treatment Group by System Organ Class,
`Preferred Term, and Severity (Treated Analysis Set; Applicant Table)
`
`Number 1%! of natients‘
`Bendamustine
`Chlorambucil
`gfi=153l
`1§=1432
`Grade
`Grade
`4
`4
`
`3 or 4
`
`3
`
`3
`
`3 or 4
`
`32 (22)
`
`12 (8)
`
`44 (31)
`
`20 (14)
`17 (12)
`5 (3)
`2(1)
`10 (7)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`2 (l)
`1 (<1)
`3 (2)
`0
`0
`0
`l (< 1)
`1 (<1)
`l (< 1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`3 (2)
`0
`[(<1)
`0
`l (<1 l)
`l (< 1)
`2 (l)
`
`1 (<1)
`0
`1 (<1)
`2 (l)
`0
`0
`0
`2 l
`
`5 (3)
`9 (6)
`8 (6)
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`O
`0
`O
`O
`0
`0
`O
`O
`O
`O
`0
`0
`0
`O
`0
`O
`0
`O
`0
`O
`O
`0
`1 (<1)
`
`1 (<1)
`O
`0
`0
`0
`0
`O
`0
`
`25 (17)
`26 (18)
`13 (9)
`2 (l)
`11 (8)
`0
`0
`O
`O
`2 (l)
`1 (<1)
`3 (2)
`0
`0
`0
`I (<1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`3 (2)
`0
`1(<1)
`O
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`3 (2)
`
`2 (1)
`0
`l (< l)
`2 (l)
`0
`0
`0
`2 1
`(continued)
`
`System organ class
`Preferred term
`Total number of patients with at least
`1 adverse event
`Total number of patients with at least
`1 nonhematologic adverse event
`Blood and lymphatic system disorders
`Neutropenia
`Leukopenia
`Thrombocytopenia
`Lyniphopenia
`Anemia
`Febrile neutropenia
`Hemolysis
`Granulocytopenia
`Hemolytic anemia
`Cardiac disorders
`Arrhythmia supraventricular
`Cardiovascular disorder
`Myocardial infarction
`Cardiac failure
`Extrasystoles
`Ventricular extrasystoles
`Ear and labyrinth disorders
`Vertigo
`Eye disorders
`Retinal detachment
`Gastrointestinal disorders
`Diarrhea
`-
`Nausea
`Vomiting
`Abdominal pain
`Palatal disorder
`General disorders and administration site
`conditions
`0
`6(4)
`Pyrexia
`O
`2 (1)
`Fatigue
`0
`0
`General physical health deterioration
`0
`2 (1)
`Hepatobiliary disorders
`0
`1 (<1)
`Cholestasis
`0
`1 (<1)
`Hepatotoxicity
`0
`1 (<1)
`'
`Janndice
`0
`0
`H erbilirubinemia
`Abbreviations and footnotes are provided on the last page of this table
`
`50 (33)
`
`38 (25)
`
`40 (26)
`36 (24)
`16 (10)
`20 (13)
`16 (10)
`10 (7)
`3 (2) '
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`2 (1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`I (<1)
`4 (3)
`2 (l)
`1(<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`7 (5)
`
`12 (8)
`27 (18)
`20 (13)
`3 (2)
`4 (3)
`O
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`O
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`O
`0
`0
`O
`0
`0
`
`88 (58)
`
`52 (34)
`63 (41)
`36 (24)
`23 (15)
`20 (13)
`10 (7)
`4 (3)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`O
`3 (2)
`1 (<1)
`1 (< 1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (< l)
`4 (3)
`2 (l)
`v 1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`7 (5)
`
`6 (4)
`2 (l)
`O
`2 (l)
`l (< l)
`l (< l)
`1 (<1)
`0
`
`Data in above table was confirmed by review of raw and derived datasets and CRFs.
`Table continues on next page.
`
`82
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`
`Treanda (bendamustine)
`
`Continuation of Table 7.7
`
`System organ class
`Preferred term
`
`3
`
`Number (%) of patients‘
`Bendnmustine
`Chlorttmbucil
`(§==153)
`(N=143)
`Grade
`Grade
`4
`4
`
`3 or 4
`
`3
`
`3 or 4
`
`0
`0
`5 (3)
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`o
`0
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`1 (~11)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`6 (4)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`2(1)
`1 (< 1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`2 (1)
`0
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`
`t)
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`o
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`l (<- 1)
`0
`2 (1)
`0
`0
`t)
`0
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`t]
`
`0
`t)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`2(1)
`0
`I (<1)
`1 <1)
`(continued)
`
`Immune system disorders
`Hypersensitivity
`Infectious and infestations
`Pneumonia
`infection
`Pseudomonal sepsis
`Sepsis
`Tracheobronchitis
`Upper respiratory tract infection
`Viral infection
`Hepatitis B
`Herpes zoster
`Pneumonia bacterial
`Respiratory tract infection
`Investigations
`Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
`Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
`Blood bilirubin increased
`Blood creatinine increased
`Blood uric acid increased
`Gannna-glutamyl trattsfemse increased
`Hemoglobin decreased
`Alanine aminotransferase increased
`Aspartate aminotransferase increased
`Platelet count decreased
`Weight increased
`Metabolism and nutrition disorders
`Hyperuricemia
`Dehydration
`Hyperglycemia
`i-Iyperkalemia
`Hypokalemia
`Anorexia
`Neoplasms benign, malignant and
`unspecified (including cysts and polyps)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`Tumor lysis syndrome
`0
`1 (<1)
`Bronchial carcinoma
`0
`1 (<1)
`Nervous system disorders
`0
`l ('11)
`Paraplegia
`0
`0
`Facial palsy
`1)
`0
`Neuralgia
`Abbreviations and footnotes are provided on the last page of this table.
`
`_
`
`2 (l)
`2 (l)
`10(7)
`4 (3)
`3 (2)
`1 (<1)
`l
`(A—: I)
`1 (<1)
`1 (~-’ 1)
`I (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`4 (5)
`2 (l)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`3 (2)
`0
`1 (<1)
`l («T 1)
`0
`l (”1.1)
`0
`Z (I)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`o
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`2 (l)
`0
`0
`0
`l (<I)
`i (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`o
`3(2)
`3 (2)
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`
`2 (1)
`2 (1)
`10(7)
`4 (3)
`3 (2)
`1 (<1)
`i (<1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`6 (4)
`2(1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`l (<--l)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`l (f l)
`0
`l)
`0
`0
`6 (4)
`3 (2)
`1 (<1)
`1 (-~" 1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`O
`3 (2)
`
`2 (l)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`1 ('11)
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`4 (3)
`0
`1 (< 1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`I (4' 1)
`1 (< 1)
`0
`1 (<1)
`4 (3)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`2 (I)
`0
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`t (<I)
`2 (1)
`0
`0
`0
`1 ('11)
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`
`0
`0
`2 (l)
`O
`1 (<1)
`1
`<1 1)
`
`Data in above table was confirmed by review of raw and derived datasets and CRFs.
`Table continues on next page.
`
`83
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`'
`
`Treanda (bendamustine)
`
`Continuation of Table 7.7
`
`System organ class
`Preferred term
`
`3
`
`Number (%) of patients'
`Bendamustiue
`Chloranlbucil
`(i§=153)
`(5:143)
`Grade
`Grade
`4
`4
`
`3 or 4
`
`3
`
`3 or 4
`
`,
`
`2 (1)
`1 (<1)
`l («. l)
`l
`(<7 l)
`I (<1)
`
`I (<1)
`2 (1)
`
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`2 (l)
`
`0
`l(<l)
`1 (~51)
`0
`1 (<1)
`l (‘11)
`1 (<1)
`D
`0
`0
`0
`0
`3(2)
`0
`2 (l)
`I (<1)
`0
`0
`
`3 (2)
`2(1)
`1 (<1)
`I (<1)
`1 (<1)
`
`1 (<1)
`4 (3)
`
`I («‘l)
`l(-'¢l)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<21)
`l ((1)
`1 (<1)
`7 (5)
`4 (3)
`i (<1)
`1 (<1)
`l («3.1)
`8 (5)
`4 (3)
`3 (2)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`
`Renal and urinary disorders
`Renal impaimtent
`Pollzdtinria
`Renal failure acute
`Reproductive system and breast
`disorders
`Epididpnitis
`Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal
`disorders
`1 (<1)
`Cough
`0
`Dyspnca
`0
`Hypoxia
`1 (<1)
`Lung infiltration
`0
`Pleural effusion
`0
`Pulmonary embolism
`0
`Respiratory failure
`7 (5)
`Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
`4 (3)
`Rash
`l (q)
`Rush generalized
`1 (<1)
`Skin burning sensation
`1 (<1)
`Urticnria
`5 (3)
`Vascular disorders
`4 (3)
`Hypertension
`1 (<1)
`Hypertensive crisis
`0
`Circulatory collapse
`0
`Anerial occlusive disease
`0
`Hemorrhage
`SOURCE: Summary [5.30. Summary 15.25, and Listing 20.
`" If a patient reported an adverse event more than once. the greatest severity is presented for that adverse
`event.
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`4 (3)
`
`I (<1)
`2(1)
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`4 (3)
`3 (2)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`3 (2)
`2(1)
`0
`0
`1 (Cl)
`(l
`
`I)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`O
`1 (<1)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0 -
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`O
`D
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`D
`0
`I (<1)
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`5 (3)
`
`I (<1)
`2(1)
`0
`0
`I (<1)
`I (<1)
`0
`4 (3)
`3 (2)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`4 (3)
`2(1)
`D
`0
`l (i I)
`I (<1)
`
`-
`
`NOTE: Patients are cmmted only once in each preferred term category and only once in each system organ
`class category. at the greatest severity for each.
`
`Data in above table was confirmed by review of raw and derived datasets and CRFS.
`
`Serious Adverse Events
`
`Fifty-two serious adverse events (SAEs); were reported by 43 patients during the study;
`including those that led to death. Among these, 27 (18%) patients receiving bendamustine
`reported 32 SAEs and 16 (11%) patients receiving chlorambucil reported 20 SAEs.
`
`The most common SAE was infection with 7 (5%) patients treated with bendamustine and 6
`(4%) patients treated with chlorambucil reporting this SAE. SAEs occurring in 22 patients in the
`bendamustine group were pneumonia (3 patients), hypersensitivity (3 patients), anemia (2
`
`84
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`
`Treanda (bendamustine)
`
`patients), tumor lysis syndrome (2 patients), and vomiting (2 patients). The SAE occurring in 2
`or more patients receiving chlorambucil was herpes zoster (2 patients). All other SAEs in each
`group were reported in only one patient each. One patient in the chlorambucil group reported
`two occasions of hypersensitivity (Table 7-8).
`
`Table 7-8 Serious Adverse Reactions Occurring in Either Treatment Group by System Organ Class and
`Preferred Term (Treated Analysis Set; Applicant Table)
`
`Bendamustine
`Chlorambucll
`
`(N=153)
`Number
`(%) of
`System organ class
`patientsa
`Preferred term
`27 (18)
`Patients reporting at least 1 serious adverse event
`4 (3)
`Blood and lymphatic system disorders
`2 ( l)
`Anemia
`1 (<1)
`Anemia hemolytie autoimmune
`I («11)
`Hemolysis
`-
`1 (<1)
`Pancytopenia
`0
`Hcmolytic anemia
`1 (<1)
`Cardiac disorders
`1 (<11)
`Myocardial infarction
`0
`Cardiac failure
`1 (<1)
`Eye disorders
`1 (<2!)
`Retinal detachment
`2(1)
`Gastrointestinal disorders
`2 (l)
`Vomiting
`0
`_
`Abdominal pain
`2(1)
`General disorders and administration site conditions
`1 (<1)
`General physical health deterioration
`l (-‘-'l)
`Pyrexia
`1 (<1)
`Hepatobtllary disorders
`1 (<1)
`Gallbladder pain
`3 (2)
`Immune system disorders
`3 (2)
`l-lypersensilivity
`7 (5)
`Infections and infestations
`3 (2)
`Pneumonia
`1 (<1)
`Herpes zoster
`1 (ail)
`Infection
`1 (-:l)
`Respiratory tract infection
`1 (<1)
`Sepsis
`0
`Hepatitis B
`0
`Meningitis
`O
`Pneumonia bacterial
`0
`Uppcr respiratory tract infection
`0
`Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
`0
`Head injury
`1 (<1)
`Metabolism and nutrition disorders
`I (<1)
`Dehydration
`1 (<1)
`hrlusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
`i (<1)
`Sacral pain
`Abbreviations and footnotes are provided on the last page of this table.
`
`Number
`of events
`32
`5
`2
`1
`I
`l
`0
`1
`1
`0
`1
`I
`2
`2
`0
`2
`i
`l
`1
`I
`4
`4
`7
`3
`1
`l
`l
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`I
`1
`1
`
`93:14.5)
`Number
`(%) of
`patients“
`16 (11)
`l (<l)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`l (<1)
`1 (<1)
`‘ 0
`i (<1)
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`I (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`I (<1)
`0
`0
`l (<l)
`l ('11)
`6 (4)
`0
`2 (l)
`0
`0
`0
`I (<1)
`I (it)
`1 (11)
`I (<1)
`1 (<1)
`i (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`Number
`of events
`20
`l
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`1
`0
`‘1
`0
`O
`1
`0
`I
`1
`0
`I
`0
`0
`2
`2
`6
`l)
`2
`0
`0
`0
`I
`I
`l
`I
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`(continued)
`
`85
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Qin Ryan, MD, PhD for efficacy review
`Virginia Kwitkowski, MS, RN, CRNP for safety review
`NDA 22249
`
`Treanda (bendamustine)
`
`Data in above table was confirmed by review of raw and derived datasets and CRFS.
`
`Continuation of Table 7.8
`Bendamusline
`(Thlorambucil
`
`System organ class
`Preferred term
`
`Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified
`(including cysts and polyps)
`Tumor lysis syndrome
`Nervous system disorders
`Paraplegia
`Neuralgia
`Reproductive system and breast disorders
`Epididymitis
`Respiratory, thoracic and mediustinnl disorders
`Lung infiltration
`Pleural effusion
`Epistaxis
`Laryngeal edema
`Pulmonary embolism
`Skin and subcutaneous [issue disorders
`Unicaria
`Vascular disorders
`Arterial occlusive disease
`Hemorrhage
`Phlebilis
`
`SOURCE: Summary 15.28. Ad lloc Summary I 1. Listing 2|.
`“ Patients may have reponed more than 1 adverse event.
`
`(N=153)
`Number
`
`(N=143)
`Number
`
`(%) of
`atients“
`
`Number
`of events
`
`(%) of
`atiean“
`
`Number
`of events
`
`2 (l)
`2 (l)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`2 (l)
`1 (<1)
`l (<l)
`0
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`2
`2
`1
`1
`0
`1
`I
`2
`1
`l
`0
`0
`0
`1
`I
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`0
`l (<l)
`0
`0
`3 (2)
`0
`0
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`1 (<1)
`0
`0
`3 (2)
`1 (<1)
`I (<11)
`I <1
`
`0
`()
`1
`0
`1
`0
`0
`3
`0
`0
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`3
`1
`1
`1
`
`Data in above table was confirmed by review of raw and derived datasets and CRFs.
`
`,
`I'Rev1ewer comments: The bendamustlne group experienced more serious andsevere .
`‘ (grade3&4) adverse events thanthe chlorambucil group;- The serious and severe (grade 3
`/& 4) adVerSe reactions seenWith bendamustlneare not unusual feracytotoxic agent in”this
`- patient population. ThereaCtiVons seencantypically be managed by an oncologist. Serious
`adverse reactiOns are not asClinically useful asSevere (grade 3 and 4) adVerse reaCtions
`becauseVSAEsinclude hespitalizations. SOme countriesadmitpatientsfor reasons that
`
`"Wouldnotresult111 VaU.S.admission; partly dueto the variatiOnsin healthcaresystems.
`
`7.3.3 Dropouts and/or Discontinuations
`
`Adverse reactions were the most frequent cause of study withdrawal. Twenty-two pati

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket