throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`022063Orig1s000
`
`ADMINISTRATIVE and CORRESPONDENCE
`DOCUMENTS
`
`
`
`
`

`

`ACTION PACKAGE CHECKLIST
`
`NDA # 022063
`BLA #
`
`NDA Supplement #
`BLA Supplement #
`
`IfNDA, Efficacy Supplement Type:
`(an action package is not requiredfor SE8 or SE9 supplements)
`
`Proprietary Name: Mydayis
`.
`.
`.
`.
`_
`Estabhshed/Proper Name. mixed salts ofa Single-entity
`amphetamme product
`Dosa - e Form:
`Ca - sules
`
`.
`.
`Applicant: Shire, LLC.
`Agent for Applicant (ifapplicable): Peggy Sung;
`SUI
`2
`1g@shire.com
`
`RPM: Latrice Wilson, PharmD; latrice.wilson@fda.hhs.gov;
`240402-5317
`
`.
`_
`.
`.
`.
`Divrsron. Psychiatry Products
`For ALL 5051252) applicationsI two months prior to EVERY action:
`
`NDA Application Type: E 505(b)(1) D 505(b)(2)
`Efiicacy Supplement:
`El 505(b)(1) CI 505(b)(2)
`
`BLA Applicatim‘ Type: D 351(k) El 351(3)
`Eflicacy Supplement:
`I:I 351(k)
`I:| 351(a)
`
`. Review the information in the 505(b)(2) Assessment and submit
`the draft2 to CDER 0ND IO for clearance.
`Check Orange Book for newly listed patents and/or
`exclusivity (including pediatric exclusivity)
`
`E] No changes
`I:] New patent/exclusivity (nonfi' CDER 0ND IO)
`Date of check:
`
`Note: Ifpediatric exclusivity has been granted or the pediatric
`information in the labeling ofthe listed drag changed, determine whether
`pediatric information needs to be added to or deletedfrom the labeling of
`this drug.
`
`02° Actions
`
`Proposed action
`0
`0 User Fee Goal Date is June 20 2017
`
`IX AP
`
`D TA
`
`DCR
`
`I:] Received
`
`0
`
`Previous actions (specifi' type and datefor each action taken)
`
`I: None Approvable 5/18/2007
`
`Ifaccelerated approval or approval based on efficacy studies in animals, were promotional
`materials received?
`
`Note: Promotional materials to be used within 120 days after approval must have been
`submitted (for exceptions, see
`hflpzllwww.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceCongplianceReglflatogInfomlation/Guida
`nces/ucn1069965.
`. If not submitted, e «lain
`
`03° Application Characteristics 3
`
`l The Application Infor-ation Section is (only) a checklist. The Contents of Action Package Section (beginning on page 2) lists
`the documents to be included in the Action Package.
`2 For resubmissions, 505(b)(2) applications must be cleared before the action, but it is not necessary to resubmit the draft 505(b)(2)
`Assessment to CDER 0ND 10 unless the Assessment has been substantively revised (e.g., new listed drug, patent certification
`revised).
`3 Answer all questions in all sections in relation to the pending application, i.e., if the pending application is an NDA or BLA
`supplement, then the questions should be answered in relation to that supplement, not in relation to the original NDA or BLA.
`
`Versiom 05/09/17
`
`Reference ID: 4116124
`
`

`

`NDA 022063
`
`Page 2
`
`[:I Priority
`IX Standard
`Review priority:
`Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
`Chemical classification (new NDAs only):
`(confirm chemical classification at time ofapproval)
`
`D Fast Track
`I:I Rolling Review
`El Orphan drug designation
`I:| Breakthrough Therapy designation
`0V0”: Set the submission property in DARRITS and notify the CDER Breakthrough Therapy Program Manager;
`Refer to the “RPM 81' Checklistfor Considerations afier Designation Granted”for other required actions: CST SharePoint)
`
`D Rx-to-OTC tun switch
`E] Rx—to-OTC partial switch
`I:I Direct-to-OTC
`
`NDAs: Subpart H
`E] Accelerated approval (21 CFR 3 14.510)
`I:I Restricted distribution (21 CFR 314.520)
`Subpart I
`I:I Approval based on animal studies
`
`BLAs: Subpart E
`I:I Accelerated approval (21 CFR 601.41)
`E] Restricted distribution (21 CFR 601.42)
`SubpartH
`I:I Approval based on animal studies
`
`I:I Submitted in response to a PMR
`I:I Submitted in response to a PMC
`I:I Submitted in response to a Pediatric Written Request
`
`Comments:
`
`REMS: I:I MedGuide
`I:I Communication Plan
`I:] ETASU
`E MedGuide w/o REMS
`[:1 REMS not required
`
`03° BLAs only: Is the product subject to official FDA lot release per 21 CFR 610.2
`(approvals only)
`
`El Yes
`
`[:I No
`
`03° Public communications (approvals only)
`
`0 Oflice of Executive Programs (OEP) liaison has been notified of action
`
`IX Yes D No
`
`
`
`0
`
`Indicate what types (ifany) of information were issued
`
`{0 Exclusivity
`
`X None
`|:] FDA Press Release
`E] FDA Talk Paper
`E] CDER Q&As
`C] Other
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Is approval of this application blocked by any type of exclusivity (orphan, 5-year
`NCE, 3-year, pediatric exclusivity)?
`If so, specifyifythetype
`
`IZNo
`
`[:I Yes
`
`'2' Patent Information (NDAs only)
`
`0
`
`Patent Information:
`Verify that form FDA-3542a was submitted for patents that claim the drug for
`which approval is sought
`
`‘2 Verified
`E] Not applicable because drug is
`an old antibiotic.
`
`'2' List ofoflicers/employees who participated in the decision to approve this application and
`consented to be identified on this list (approvals only)
`
`‘Z In lud d
`c
`e
`
`Documentation of consent/non-consent by officers/employees
`
`IX Included
`
`Reference ID: 4116124
`
`

`

`NDA 022063
`
`Page 3
`
`‘2' Copies of all action letters (including approval letter withfinal labeling)
`
`'3 Package Insert (write submission/communication date at upper right offirstpage ofPI)
`
`0 Most recent drafi labeling (ifit is division-proposed labeling, it should be in
`track—changesformat)
`Original applicant-proposed labeling
`
`'2' Medication Guide/Patient Package Insert/Instructions for Use/Device Labeling (write
`submission/communication date at upper right offirstpage ofeach piece)
`
`Action(s) and date(s):
`Approval 6/20/2017
`Approvable 05/ l 8/2007
`
`X Included
`
`X] Included
`X4 Medication Guide
`[:1 Patient Package Insert
`E] Instructions for Use
`E] Device Labeling
`E] None
`
`0 Most-recent drafi labeling (lfit is division—proposed labeling, it should be in
`track-changesformat)
`0 Original applicant-proposed labeling
`
`[X] Included
`
`[Z Included
`
`
`
`6°
`
`labels (full color carton and immediate-container labels) (write
`submission/communication date on upper right offirstpage ofeach submission)
`0 Most-recent drafl labeling
`
`'3 Proprietary Name
`0 Acceptability/non—acceptability letter(s) (indicate date(s))
`0
`Review(s) (indicate date(s)
`
`‘2'
`
`labeling reviews (indicate dates ofreviews)
`
`IE Included
`
`04/14/2017
`04/13/2017
`
`RPM: X None
`DMEPA: E None 5/18/2017;
`6/19/2017; 6/20/2017
`DMPP/PLT (DRISK):
`E] None 5/30/2017
`OPDP: E] None 05/26/2017;
`5/30/2017
`
`SEALD: E None
`css: E None
`Product Quality E None
`Other: IX None
`
`RPM Filing Review‘l/Memo of Filing Meeting (indicate date ofeach review)
`All NDA 505(b)(2) Actions: Date each action cleared by 505(b)(2) Clearance Committee
`
`N/A
`IX] Not a (b)(2)
`
`Application Integrity Policy (AIP) Status and Related Documents
`http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/ApplicationIntegrityPolicy/default.htm
`
`0 Applicant is on the AIP
`
`I:] Yes E No
`
`4 Filing reviews for scientific disciplines are NOT required to be included in the action package.
`
`Reference ID: 4116124
`
`

`

`NDA 022063
`
`Page 4
`
`0
`
`This application is on the AIP
`
`o
`
`0
`
`Ifyes, Center Director’s Exception for Review memo (indicate date)
`
`Ifyes, 0C clearance for approval (indicate date ofclearance
`communication)
`
`Pediatrics (approvals only)
`0 Date reviewed by PeRC 5/17/2017
`IfPeRC review not necessary, explain:
`
`03° Breakthrough Therapy Designation
`
`O
`
`O
`
`0
`
`Breakthrough Therapy Designation Letter(s) (granted, denied, an/or rescinded)
`
`CDER Medical Policy Council Breakthrough Therapy Designation
`Determination Review Template(s) (include only the completed template(s) and
`not the meetin' minutes)
`
`CDER Medical Policy Council Brief — Evaluating a Breakthrough Therapy
`Designation for Rescission Template(s) (include only the completed template(s)
`and not the meeting minutes)
`
`(completed CDER MPC templates can befound in DARRIS as clinical reviews or on
`the AlPC SharePoint Site
`
`03° Outgoing communications: letters, emails, and faxes considered important to include in
`the action package by the reviewing office/division (e.g., clinical SPA letters, RTF letter,
`Formal Dispute Resolution Request decisional letters, etc.) (do not include OPDP letters
`regarding pre—launch promotional materials as these are non-disclosable; do not include
`Master File letters; do not include previous action letters, as these are located elsewhere
`in package)
`Internal documents: memoranda, telecons, emails, and other documents considered
`'
`rtant to include in the action package by the reviewing office/division (e.g.,
`ato Briefin minutes, Medical Poli Council meetin- minutes
`
`'
`
`Ack Letter: 1/17/20 1 7
`
`Information Requests: 1/17/2017;
`3/13/2017; 5/25/2017;
`PMR: 5/15/201 7
`
`Approval Receipt: 6/20/201 7
`
`O
`0..
`
`0
`0..
`
`El None 4
`
`Minutes of Meetings
`
`0
`
`O
`
`0
`
`Ifnot the first review cycle, any end-of-review meeting (indicate date ofmtg)
`
`IX N/A or no mtg—
`
`Pre-NDA/BLA meeting (indicate date ofmtg)
`
`EOPZ meeting (indicate date ofmtg)
`
`0 Mid-cycle Communication (indicate date ofmtg)
`
`0
`
`Late-cycle Meeting (indicate date ofmtg)
`
`0 Other milestone meetings (e.g., EOP2a, CMC focused milestone meetings)
`(indicate dates 0 mts)
`
`N/A
`
`Advisory Committee Meeting(s)
`
`0 Date(s) of Meeting(s)
`
`No AC meeting
`
`gg 2E
`
`'3' Oflice Director Decisional Memo (indicate datefin' each review)
`
`Division Director Summary Review (indicate datefor each review)
`
`D None
`
`6/19/2017
`
`Cross-Discipline Team Leader Review (indicate datefor each revieuy
`
`E] None
`
`6/19/201 7
`
`PMR/PMC Development Templates (indicate total numbel)
`
`Reference ID: 4116124
`
`

`

`NDA 022063
`
`Page 5
`
`’2' Clinical Reviews
`
`Clinical Team Leader Review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`[Z No separate review
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Clinical review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`Social scientist review(s) (if OTC drug) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`Fmancral Disclosure rev1ews(s) (glimatlon/date ifaddressed ln another rev1ew
`If no financial disclosure information was required, check here I:] and include a
`review/memo explaining why not (indicate date ofreview/memo)
`
`Clinical reviews from immunology and other clinical areas/divisions/Centers (indicate
`date ofeach review)5
`
`6/20/2017
`
`IX None
`
`Clinical review dated 6/20/17
`
`
`
`°2° Controlled Substance Stafi‘review(s) and Scheduling Recommendation (indicate date of
`each review)
`
`|:] N/A 6/14/2017
`
`Risk Management
`0
`REMS Documents and REMS Supporting Document (indicate date(s) of
`submission(s))
`REMS Memo(s) and letter(s) (indicate date(s))
`Risk management review(s) and recommendations (including those by OSE and
`CSS) (indicate date ofeach review and indicate location/date ifincmporated
`into another review)
`
`E] None
`
`'3' OSI Clinical Inspection Review Summary(ies) (include copies of051 letters to
`im‘estigatorzr)
`
`IE Clinical Inspection Summary
`05/11/2017
`
`Clinical Microbiology Team Leader Review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`Clinical Microbiology Review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`Efigwone See product quahty
`
`°2° Statistical Division Director Review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`E No separate review
`
`Statistical Team Leader Review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`Statistical Review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`E] None
`
`5/ 1 8/201 7
`
`°2° Clinical Pharmacology Division Director Review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`IX No separate review
`
`Clinical Pharmacology Team Leader Review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`Clinical Pharmacology review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`.
`No separate renew
`
`E] None
`
`6/12/2017
`
`°2° 081 Clinical Pharmacology Inspection Review Summary (include copies of081 letters)
`
`IX None requested
`
`5 For Part 3 combination products, all reviews from the reviewing Center(s) should be entered into the official archive (for further
`instructions, see “Section 508 Compliant Documents: Process for Regulatory Project Managers” located in the CST electronic
`repository).
`
`Reference ID: 4116124
`
`

`

`NDA 022063
`
`Page 6
`
`'3' Pharmacology/1'oxicology Discipline Reviews
`
`0 ADP/I Review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`Supervisory Review(s) (indicate datefor each review)
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Pharm/tox review(s), including referenced IND reviews (indicate datefor each
`review
`
`C] None
`
`5,25/2017
`
`[Z No separate review
`
`[Z No separate review
`
`
`
`Review(s) by other disciplines/divisions/Centers requested by PIT reviewer (indicate date
`for each review)
`
`[Z None
`
`Statistical review(s) of carcinogenicity studies (indicate datefor each review)
`
`IX No carc
`
`-
`.0.
`9 ECAC/CAC report/memo ofmeeting
`6° OSI Nonchmcal Inspection Review Summary (include copies of081 letters)
`
`IE None
`Included in PIT review, page
`[Z None requested
`
`°.° Product Quality Disciplme Reviews“
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Tertiary rev1ew (indicate datefor each review)
`
`IX None
`
`Secondary revnew (e.g. Branch Chiet) (Indicate datefor each review
`
`I:I None 06/05/2017
`
`Integrated Quality Assessment (contains the Executive Summary and the primary
`reviews fi'om each product quality review discipline) (indicate datefor each
`review)
`
`I:] None
`
`06/05/2017
`
`03° Reviews by other disciplines/divisions/Centers requested by product quality review team
`(indicate date ofeach revieu)
`
`El None
`
`06/05/2017
`
`03° Envnonmental Assessment (check one) (original and supplemental apphcations)
`
`I:I Categorical Exclusion (indicate review date)(all original applications and
`all efi'icacy supplements that could increase the patientpopulation)
`
`El Review & FONSI (indicate date of review)
`
`IX Review & Environmental Impact Statement (indicate date ofeach review)
`
`5/17/2017
`
`6° Facilities Review/Inspection
`
`IX Facilities inspections (indicate date of recommendation; within one week of
`[Z Acceptable' 6/1/2017
`taking an approval action, confirm that there is an acceptable recommendation
`.
`before issuing approval letter) (only original applications and eflicaqv
`supplements thatrequire a manufacturing facility inspection(e.g., newstrength, E :1:gggmmmendauon
`
`.
`
`manufacturingprocess, or manufacturing site change)
`
`6 Do not include Master File (MF) reviews or communications to MF holders. However, these documents should be made available
`upon signatory request.
`
`Reference ID: 4116124
`
`

`

`NDA 022063
`
`Page 7
`
`£0 For all 505(b)(2) applications:
`0 Check Orange Book for newly listed patents and/or exclusivity (including
`pediatric exclusivity)
`
`E] No changes
`E] New patent/exclusivity
`Wotlfil CDER 0M) 10)
`
`
`
`0
`
`Finalize 505(b)(2) assessment
`
`0:- For Breakthrough Therapy (131) Designated drugs:
`0 Noti
`the CDER BT Pro . n Mana ' er
`'20 For products that need to be added to the flush list (generally opioids): Flush List
`'
`the Division of Online Communications, Office of Communications
`0
`°.° Send a courtesy copy of approval letter and all attachments to applicant by fax or
`secure email
`0
`v If an FDA communication will issue, notify Press Office of approval action after
`confirmin- that a licant received courtes co of a uroval letter
`
`°3° Ensure that proprietary name, if any, and established name are listed in the
`Application Product Names section of DARRTS, and that the proprietary name is
`identified as the “ referred” name
`
`03° Ensure Pedialn'c Record is accurate
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Send approval ema11w1th1n one busmess day to CDER-APPROVALS
`
`.0
`.0 Take Action Package (if in paper) down to Document Room for scanning within
`two business da 5
`
`D Done
`
`|:| Done
`(Send email to CDER 0ND IO)
`I:I Done
`
`K4 Done
`
`|:I Done
`
`X Done
`
`V
`M Done
`
`bi Done
`
`Reference ID: 4116124
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`LATRICE WILSON
`06/23/2017
`
`Reference ID: 4116124
`
`

`

`
`
`Wilson, Latrice
`
`
`
`'om:
`
`uent:
`
`To:
`Subject:
`
`
`
`
`
`Sung, Peggy <psung@shire.com>
`
`
`
`
`
`Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:19 PM
`
`
`Wilson, Latrice
`
`
`
`
`RE: NDA 022063 Mydayis Approval
`
`
`
`
`
`Categories:
`
`
`
`lsponsor
`
`
`
`Hi Latrice.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thanks for sendlng the approval letter. I’d like to confirm receipt of the email.
`
`
`
`
`Kind regards.
`
`PeQQV
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Wilson, Latrice [mailto:Latrice.Wilson@fda.hhs.gov]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:00 PM
`
`
`
`To: Sung, Peggy
`
`
`
`
`Subject: NDA 022063 Mydayis Approval
`
`
`
`
`
`Hi Peggy,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Division has granted approval for NBA 022063, Mydayis (mixed salts of a single—entity amphetamine product)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`extended release tablets. Please see attached for a courtesy copy of the approval letter. Official correspondence will be
`received via email.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please confirm receipt of this email as soon as possible.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Latrice M. Wilson, PharmD
`Regulatory Project Manager
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation & Research
`
`
`
`
`
`Office of Drug Evaluation 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`Tel: 240-402—5317
`
`
`latricemilson
`dahhs. ov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`****************$*****************$*$*t*************$*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Shire plc, the ultimate parent of the Shire Group of companies, is registered in Jersey No. 99854
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Registered Office: 22 Grenville Street, St Helier, Jersey JE4 SPX
`*************$***************$*********************$**
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please consider the environment before printing this e—mail
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4119537
`Reference ID: 4119537
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`may be legally privileged and are intended solely for the use of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`not the intended recipient please note that any disclosure,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`distribution, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited and may
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`be unlawfiil. If received in error, please delete this email and any
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`attachments and confirm this to the sender.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4119537
`Reference ID: 4119537
`
`
`
`

`

`
`Wilson, Latrice
`
`
`
`
`
`'om:
`
`sent:
`
`To:
`Subject:
`
`
`
`
`
`Sung, Peggy <psung©shire.com>
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:37 PM
`
`
`Wilson, Latrice
`
`
`
`
`
`RE: NDA 022063 Mydayis Approval
`
`
`
`
`
`Categories:
`
`
`
`15ponsor
`
`
`
`Hi Latrice,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Upon review, Shire has noticed a misspelling in Section 2.4 Dosing lnforrnation (does —) dose). The misspelling will be corrected in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`final labels and SPL, which will be submitted to ESG and uploaded to DailyMed within 14 days of approval.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pediatric Use [13 to 17 years!
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The recommended starting does is 12.5 mg once daily in the morning upon awakening. Dosage may be adjusted in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`increments of 12.5 mg no sooner than weekly, up to a recommended maximum dose of 25 mg once daily. The dose
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`should be individualized according to the needs and response of the patient. Doses higher than 25 mg have not been
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`evaluated in clinical trials in pediatric patients.
`
`
`
`
`Kind regards,
`
`P3993!
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Wilson, Latrice |mailto:Latrice.Wilson@fda.hhs.gov|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:00 PM
`
`
`
`To: Sung, Peggy
`
`
`
`
`abject: NDA 022063 Mydayis Approval
`
`
`
`
`
`Hi Peggy,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Division has granted approval for NDA 022063, Mydayis (mixed salts of a single—entity amphetamine product)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`extended release tablets. Please see attached for a courtesy copy of the approval letter. Official correspondence will be
`received via email.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please confirm receipt of this email as soon as possible.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Latrice M. Wilson, PharmD
`Regulatory Project Manager
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation 8. Research
`
`
`
`
`
`Office of Drug Evaluation E
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`
`Tel: 240-402—531 ‘r'
`
`
`latrice.wilson
`fda.hhs. ov
`
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4119537
`Reference ID: 4119537
`
`
`
`

`

`*********#***********************************$***$****
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Shire plc, the ultimate parent of the Shire Group of companies, is registered in Jersey No. 99854
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Registered Office: 22 Grenville Street, St Helier, Jersey JE4 8PX
`*************************$****************************
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please consider the environment before printing this e—mail
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`may be legally privileged and are intended solely for the use of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`not the intended recipient please note that any disclosure,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`distribution, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited and may
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`be unlawful. If received in error, please delete this email and any
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`attachments and confirm this to the sender.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4119537
`Reference ID: 4119537
`
`
`
`

`

`Wilson, Latrice
`
`om:
`sent:
`To:
`
`Subject
`
`Sung, Peggy <psung@shire.com>
`Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:26 PM
`Wilson, Latrice
`
`RE: NDA 022063 Mydayis Post Market Requirements
`
`Categories:
`
`lSponsor
`
`Hi Latrioe.
`
`Shire agrees to the proposed timelines for the PMRs as well.
`
`Kind regards,
`Peggy
`
`From: Wilson, Latrioe [mailtozLatrioe.Wllson@fda.hhs.gov]
`Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:20 PM
`To: Sung, Peggy
`Subject: RE: NDA 022063 Mydayis Post Market Requirements
`
`Hi Peggy.
`
`Thanks for confirming our response.
`
`In addition to the PMR, does Shire agree to the proposed timelines as well? I know that your internal timelines may be
`ioner, keeping exclusivity in mind, but I wanted to confirm.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Latrice M. Wilson. PharmD
`Regulatory Project Manager
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation 8‘ Research
`Office of Drug Evaluation I
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`Tel: 240402-5317
`
`FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG
`Aommstunow
`
`From: Sung, Peggy [mailto:gsum@shire.oom]
`Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:10 PM
`To: Wilson, Latrice
`Subject: RE: NDA 022063 Mydayis Post Market Requirements
`
`Hi Lattice.
`
`' wanted to send another quick email to confirm that Shire agrees to conducting the studies for the post market requirements in y0ur
`une 13”" email since Shire did not have a teleconfewnce with the Division today.
`
`Also. if there is any possibility of accelerating the comments for the container labels. that would really be great.
`
`Reference ID: 41 19537
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`Kind regards.
`PeQQY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Sung, Peggy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:46 PM
`
`
`
`To: 'Wilson, Latrice'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subject: RE: NDA 022063 Mydayis Post Market Requirements
`
`
`
`Hi Latn‘ce.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thanks very much for the update. Shire will await FDA's comments to the label and med guide this evening.
`
`
`
`With regards to the Division's responses to Shire’s questions. Shire confirms that enrolling de novo patients into the safety study are in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`addition to recruiting from the two safety and efficacy trials.
`
`
`
`Kind regards,
`Peggy
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Wilson, Latrice [mailto:Latrice.Wilson@fda.hhs.gov]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:57 PM
`
`
`
`To: Sung, Peggy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subject: RE: NDA 022063 Mydayis Post Market Requirements
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hi Peggy.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`We have concluded the meeting. The aim is to send the label/med guide to you this evening. Any anticipated changes to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the carton/container labels are forthcoming. Hopefully, I will have an update to you by Monday for those.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in lieu of a teleconference, the Division has drafted the following responses to your questions:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1) Based on prior FDA feedback regarding the consideration of a PWR, Shire submitted a PPSR which now includes a PK study.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a safetyi'efficacy study and an open-label safety study. These studies Outlined in the PPSR are generally consistent with the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PMR requirements. Further to these 3 studies. FDA has included one additional study in ADHD patients 6-12 years old in the
`PMR communication.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a) While we recognize that a formal decision cannot be issued during the teleconference without review from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pediatric Review Committee (PeRC). Shire would like to propose that these 4 PMR studies be issued as the PWR for
`SHP465 as well as fulfill our PREA requirements. Does FDA agree? Yes.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`b) Would FDA issue a PWR for the 4 PMR studies without the need for a revised PPSR resubmission? Yes.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2) As per the response to FDA’s information request Issued in May 2017 pertaining to the PPSR. Shire committed to submitting a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6-month study report as part of an open-label 12 month safety study to provide the requested information in 4-5 year old
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`subjects with ADHD. Shire proposed to submit a 6-month study report by the filing date to satisfy the requirements of the
`PWR.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a) A 12-month study report will be submitted by the PMR deadline. Will FDA accept a 6-month study report to fulfill the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PWR requirement? Yes. We would accept an interim 6-month study report. We understand that the open-label safety
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`study will be continuing past the timeframe for the PWR.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`b) Does FDA concur with direct enrollment Into the open-label safety study? Please clarify if enrolling de navo patients
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`into the safety study is in addition to recruiting from the two safety and efficacy trials.
`If so, direct enrollment is
`acceptable.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In light of the requirement to submit final study reports 15 months prior to expiration of the exclusivity and the projected study
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`timelines, Shire is proposing to submit draft PMR/PWR protocols to FDA as soon as possible following the action date. Would
`FDA be able to commit to a 2-week review timeline of the draft protocols? The Division cannot commit to a 2-week review
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`timeline. We will review the protocols as quickly as possible. but the timeframe will largely depend on our resources at the time
`of submission.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Latrice M. Wilson, PharmD
`Regulatory Project Manager
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4119537
`Reference ID: 4119537
`
`
`
`

`

`Center for Drug Evaluation & Research
`
`
`
`
`
`Office of Drug Evaluation l
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`
`Tel: 2404026317
`
`
`'1trlce.wilson@fda.hhegov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`u.s. FOOD & onus
`aommsrnnrrou
`
`
`
`
`El *- m
`
`
`
`fl
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Sung, Peggy [mailto:psung@shire.com]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:40 AM
`
`
`
`To: Wilson, Latrlce
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subject: RE: NDA 022063 Mydayis Post Market Requirements
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thanks. Latrice. Are you able to share when your labeling meeting is so that Shire's team can internally prepare for standby to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`promptly address all of FDA's comments? Would there also be any possibility to reserve time with the Division for a teleconference on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Friday to review the labeling in order that issues can be quickly addressed?
`
`
`
`
`Kind regards.
`
`Peggy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Wilson, Latrioe [mailto:Latrice.Wilson@fda.hhs.gov|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:00 AM
`
`
`
`To: Sung, Peggy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subject: RE: NDA 022063 Mydayis Post Market Requirements
`
`
`
`
`
`Hi Peggy,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`. received your voicemail. I am currently preparing for the labeling meeting that we have later today. I believe we will
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`respond via email to your questions. I will update you later today.
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Latrice M. Wilson, PharmD
`Regulatory Project Manager
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation 8; Research
`
`
`
`
`
`Office of Drug Evaluation I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`
`Tet: 240-402-5317
`
`
`
`
`
`
`latrice.wileon@fda.hhs.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`f-DA U.S. FOOD & DRUG
`ADMINISTIAHON
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Wilson, Latrioe
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 3:27 PM
`
`
`
`To: Sung, Peggy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subject: Re: NBA 022063 Mydayis Post Market Requirements
`
`
`
`
`
`.li Peggy,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thank you. I will relay these to my team and will send you an update as soon as possible.
`3
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4119537
`Reference ID: 4119537
`
`

`

`Sincerely,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Latrice Wilson, PharmD
`
`
`
`Regulatory Project Manager
`
`
`
`Division of Psychiatry Products
`
`
`
`
`Office of Drug Evaluation I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Center For Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA
`
`Ph: 240.402.5317
`
`
`Email: latrice.wilson@_fda.hhs.gov
`
`
`
`From: Sung, Peggy
`
`
`
`
`
`Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 3:23 PM
`
`
`
`To: Wilson, Latrice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subject: RE: NDA 022063 Mydayis Post Market Requirements
`
`
`
`
`
`Hi Latrice,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please find below Shire's questions pertaining to the post market requirements for NDA 022063.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1) Based on prior FDA feedback regarding the consideration of a PWR, Shire submitted a PPSR which now includes a PK study.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a safetylefficacy study and an open-label safety study. These studies outlined in the PPSR are generally consistent with the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PMR requirements. Further to these 3 studies, FDA has included one additional study in ADHD patients 6-12 years old in the
`PMR communication.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a) While we recognize that a formal decision cannot be issued during the teleconference without review from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pediatric Review Committee (PeRC), Shire would like to propose that these 4 PMR studies be issued as the PWR for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SHP465 as well as fulfill our PREA requirements. Does FDA agree?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`b) Would FDA issue a PWR for the 4 PMR studies without the need for a revised PPSR resubmission?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2) As per the response to FDA’s information request issued in May 2017 pertaining to the PPSR, Shire committed to submitting a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6-month study report as part of an open—label 12 month safety study to provide the requested information in 4-5 year old
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`subjects with ADHD. Shire proposed to submit a 6-month study report by the filing date to satisfy the requirements of the
`
`
`7
`PWR.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a) A 12—month study report will be submitted by the PMR deadline. Will FDA accept a 6-month study report to fulfill the
`
`
`PWR requirement?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`b) Does FDA concur with direct enrollment into the open-label safety study?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In light of the requirement to submit final study reports 15 months prior to expiration of the exclusivity and the projected study
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`timelines, Shire is proposing to submit draft PMRIPWR protocols to FDA as soon as possible following the action date. Would
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FDA be able to commit to a 2-week review timeline of the draft protocols?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Shire appreciates any feedback and the potential opportunity for a teleconference to discuss these questions.
`
`
`
`
`Kind regards,
`
`Peggy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Wilson, Latrice [mailto:Latrice.Wilson@fda.hhs.gov]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 12:44 PM
`
`
`
`To: Sung, Peggy
`,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subject: RE: NDA 022063 Mydayis Post Market Requirements
`
`
`
`
`
`Hi Peggy,
`
`
`
`0k, sounds good.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As of right now, there may be additional comments concerning the carton and container labels. I’m waiting to hear back
`
`
`
`
`on that, as we

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket