throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`022063Orig1s000
`
`CLINICAL REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CLINICAL REVIEW
`
`Application Type NDA
`Application Number(s) 022063
`Priority or Standard Standard
`
`Submit Date(s) 12/20/16
`Received Date(s) 12/20/16
`PDUFA Goal Date 6/20/17
`Division / Office Division of Psychiatry
`Products/ODE 1
`
`Reviewer Name(s) Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`Review Completion Date 5/19/17
`
`Established Name Mixed salts of a single-entity
`amphetamine
`(Proposed) Trade Name Mydayis
`Therapeutic Class stimulant
`Applicant Shire
`
`Formulation(s) Extended release capsule
`Dosing Regimen Once daily in morning
`Indication(s) Attention deficit hyperactivity
`disorder (ADHD)
`Intended Population(s) Adults, pediatrics
`
`
` years
`
`Template Version: March 6, 2009
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`
`2
`
`Table of Contents
`1 RECOMMENDATIONS/RISK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ......................................... 6
`1.1 Recommendation on Regulatory Action ............................................................. 6
`1.2 Risk Benefit Assessment. ................................................................................... 6
`1.3 Recommendations for Postmarket Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies ... 7
`1.4 Recommendations for Postmarket Requirements and Commitments ................ 7
`INTRODUCTION AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND ........................................ 8
`2.1 Product Information ............................................................................................ 8
`2.2 Tables of Currently Available Treatments for Proposed Indications ................... 8
`2.3 Availability of Proposed Active Ingredient in the United States .......................... 9
`2.4
`Important Safety Issues With Consideration to Related Drugs ........................... 9
`2.5 Summary of Presubmission Regulatory Activity Related to Submission ............ 9
`2.6 Other Relevant Background Information .......................................................... 13
`3 ETHICS AND GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICES ....................................................... 18
`3.1 Submission Quality and Integrity ...................................................................... 18
`3.2 Compliance with Good Clinical Practices ......................................................... 18
`3.3 Financial Disclosures ........................................................................................ 19
`4 SIGNIFICANT EFFICACY/SAFETY ISSUES RELATED TO OTHER REVIEW
`DISCIPLINES ......................................................................................................... 19
`4.1 Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls ............................................................ 19
`4.2 Clinical Microbiology ......................................................................................... 20
`4.3 Preclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology ............................................................... 20
`4.4 Clinical Pharmacology ...................................................................................... 20
`4.4.1 Mechanism of Action .................................................................................. 20
`4.4.2 Pharmacodynamics.................................................................................... 20
`4.4.3 Pharmacokinetics ....................................................................................... 21
`5 SOURCES OF CLINICAL DATA............................................................................ 21
`5.1 Tables of Studies/Clinical Trials ....................................................................... 21
`5.2 Review Strategy ............................................................................................... 23
`5.3 Discussion of Individual Studies/Clinical Trials ................................................. 23
`6 REVIEW OF EFFICACY ......................................................................................... 23
`6.1
`Indication .......................................................................................................... 24
`6.1.1 Methods ..................................................................................................... 24
`6.1.2 Demographics ............................................................................................ 27
`6.1.3 Subject Disposition .................................................................................... 31
`6.1.4 Analysis of Primary Endpoint(s) ................................................................. 32
`6.1.5 Analysis of Secondary Endpoints(s)........................................................... 33
`6.1.6 Other Endpoints ......................................................................................... 34
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`2
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`
`6.1.7 Subpopulations .......................................................................................... 34
`6.1.8 Analysis of Clinical Information Relevant to Dosing Recommendations .... 34
`6.1.9 Discussion of Persistence of Efficacy and/or Tolerance Effects ................. 34
`6.1.10 Additional Efficacy Issues/Analyses ........................................................... 34
`7 REVIEW OF SAFETY ............................................................................................. 35
`Safety Summary ........................................................................................................ 35
`7.1 Methods ............................................................................................................ 35
`7.1.1 Studies/Clinical Trials Used to Evaluate Safety ......................................... 35
`7.1.2 Categorization of Adverse Events .............................................................. 35
`7.1.3 Pooling of Data Across Studies/Clinical Trials to Estimate and Compare
`Incidence .................................................................................................... 36
`7.2 Adequacy of Safety Assessments .................................................................... 36
`7.2.1 Overall Exposure at Appropriate Doses/Durations and Demographics of
`Target Populations ..................................................................................... 36
`7.2.2 Explorations for Dose Response ................................................................ 37
`7.2.3 Special Animal and/or In Vitro Testing ....................................................... 37
`7.2.4 Routine Clinical Testing ............................................................................. 37
`7.2.5 Metabolic, Clearance, and Interaction Workup .......................................... 37
`7.2.6 Evaluation for Potential Adverse Events for Similar Drugs in Drug Class .. 37
`7.3 Major Safety Results ........................................................................................ 37
`7.3.1 Deaths ........................................................................................................ 37
`7.3.2 Nonfatal Serious Adverse Events .............................................................. 37
`7.3.3 Dropouts and/or Discontinuations .............................................................. 38
`7.3.4 Significant Adverse Events ........................................................................ 39
`7.3.5 Submission Specific Primary Safety Concerns .......................................... 43
`7.4 Supportive Safety Results ................................................................................ 43
`7.4.1 Common Adverse Events .......................................................................... 43
`7.4.2 Laboratory Findings ................................................................................... 44
`7.4.3 Vital Signs .................................................................................................. 44
`7.4.4 Electrocardiograms (ECGs) ....................................................................... 44
`7.4.5 Special Safety Studies/Clinical Trials ......................................................... 44
`7.4.6
`Immunogenicity .......................................................................................... 44
`7.5 Other Safety Explorations ................................................................................. 45
`7.5.1 Dose Dependency for Adverse Events ...................................................... 45
`7.5.2 Time Dependency for Adverse Events ....................................................... 45
`7.5.3 Drug-Demographic Interactions ................................................................. 45
`7.5.4 Drug-Disease Interactions .......................................................................... 45
`7.5.5 Drug-Drug Interactions ............................................................................... 45
`7.6 Additional Safety Evaluations ........................................................................... 45
`7.6.1 Human Carcinogenicity .............................................................................. 45
`7.6.2 Human Reproduction and Pregnancy Data ................................................ 45
`7.6.3 Pediatrics and Assessment of Effects on Growth ...................................... 46
`7.6.4 Overdose, Drug Abuse Potential, Withdrawal and Rebound ...................... 46
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`3
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`
`7.7 Additional Submissions / Safety Issues ............................................................ 46
`8 POSTMARKET EXPERIENCE ............................................................................... 47
`9 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................... 47
`9.1 Literature Review/References .......................................................................... 47
`9.2 Labeling Recommendations ............................................................................. 47
`9.3 Advisory Committee Meeting ............................................................................ 47
`9.4 Clinical Investigator Financial Disclosure ......................................................... 48
`9.5 Safety Assessment Table Study SHP465-306 and 305 ................................... 50
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`4
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`
`Table of Tables
`Table 1: Drugs approved for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ................................ 8
`Table 2: Studies Reviewed in Original NDA July 2006 .................................................. 13
`Table 3: Inspection of Four Clinical Sites ...................................................................... 18
`Table 4: Trial Summary for Studies in NDA 22063 Resubmission ................................ 22
`Table 5: Subject demographics in adults (SHP465-306) #1 ......................................... 28
`Table 6: Subject demographics in adults (SHP465-306) #2 ......................................... 29
`Table 7: Subject demographics in pediatric patients by age group (SHP465-305) #1 . 29
`Table 8: Subject demographics in pediatric patients by age group (SHP465-305) #2 . 30
`Table 9: Subject Disposition SHP465-306 ................................................................... 31
`Table 10: Summary of Primary Endpoint Statistics ...................................................... 32
`Table 11: Summary of Primary Endpoint Statistics ...................................................... 33
`Table 13: Adverse Event Occurrence >2% in Adults, Study SHP465-306 ................... 40
`Table 12: Pooled Adult Safety Data, >2% Adverse Events .......................................... 41
`Table 14: Adverse Events in 6 to 12 year olds- Study SHP465-305 ............................. 42
`Table 15: Adverse Events in 13 to 17 year olds- Study SHP465-305 ........................... 43
`Table 16: Pulse Rate Increase, Study SHP465-306 ..................................................... 44
`Table 17: Safety Assessments Study SHP465-306 and 305 ....................................... 50
`
`
`
`Table of Figures
`Figure 1: Mean plasma concentrations of 37.5mg in adults of d- and l- amphetamine
`16-hour capsule compared to 8-hour capsule + 4-hour tablet........................ 21
`Figure 2: Study Design Flow Chart (SHP465-306 and 305) ......................................... 26
`Figure 3: Age Distribution ............................................................................................. 28
`Figure 4: Pediatric Discontinuations by Age Group ...................................................... 38
`
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`5
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`
`1 Recommendations/Risk Benefit Assessment
`
`1.1 Recommendation on Regulatory Action
`The efficacy and safety of SHP465 (mixed salts of a single-entity
`amphetamine extended release capsule) are adequate to recommend
`approval for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
`SHP465 was studied in pediatric patients 6 to 17 years and adults. I
`recommend limiting the approved indication to pediatric patients 13 years and
`above because patients 12 years and younger experienced higher plasma
`exposure than patients 13 years and older at the same dose and experienced
`higher rates of adverse reactions, mainly insomnia and decreased appetite.
`
`
`
`1.2 Risk Benefit Assessment.
`
`ADHD is primarily a childhood disorder that may extend into adulthood. The prevalence
`of ADHD in pediatrics is about 9%, staying relatively stable over the past three decades
`using adequate diagnoses (Polanczyk, 2014). The prevalence in adults is 2.5% (Simon,
`2009).
`
`Fortunately, there are many highly effective pharmacological options to treat ADHD,
`most of these are stimulants. Stimulant preparations can be quick-acting (within 30
`minutes) and short lasting (four to six hours) or longer lasting (eight to 12 hours). The
`Agency’s drug use data demonstrates that adults and children are currently using 8- or
`12-hour extended-release stimulants followed by a 4-hour immediate-release dosage
`form. Because patients are already using stimulants for 16 hours a day, it appears that
`taking one capsule in the morning may be beneficial for some patients with ADHD; the
`proposed product was designed to provide 16-hour symptom relief.
`
`Benefit: SHP465 has the same active moiety as the highly efficacious Adderall XR
`(mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule); there is no
`surprise that SHP465 demonstrates robust efficacy in adults and pediatrics.
`
`Risk: SHP465 has the expected adverse events of a stimulant. See Section 7. During
`the drug’s development, Shire lowered the proposed dose strengths, leading to
`increased tolerability in adult and adolescent (13 to 17 years) patients.
`
`In general, the risk-benefit ratio is considered favorable in patients over 13 years old.
`For children under 13 years (i.e., 6 to 12 years), there is a small portion of children with
`severe ADHD (e.g., sequelae of fetal alcohol syndrome) for whom a 16-hour stimulant
`may be necessary, especially if those patients are already taking an extended-release
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`6
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`stimulant followed by an immediate-release one. The risk-benefit ratio of once daily
`SHP465 is considered favorable in the younger children with severe attention deficit
`hyperactivity disorder who are already taking stimulants multiple times a day.
`
`However, for most children less than 12 years old with ADHD, the risk-benefit ratio of
`SHP465 is less certain. As noted in this review, there was a concerning incidence of
`insomnia and decreased appetite reported in the 6 to 12 year old age group during
`clinical development. Given that there are only 24 hours in a day, there are only eight
`hours for sleep left in the day if patients take a 16-hour stimulant; this is clearly
`insufficient for children in this age group to rest, grow, and not be irritable. The
`American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Sleep Medicine
`currently recommend for children in this age group to sleep nine to 12 hours per 24
`hours on a regular basis to promote optimal health. Additionally, SHP465 causes
`decreased appetite that may contribute to long-term growth suppression and weight
`loss from a chronically taken stimulant.
`
`
`
`1.3 Recommendations for Postmarket Risk Evaluation and Mitigation
`Strategies
`No REMS is recommended.
`
`1.4 Recommendations for Postmarket Requirements and Commitments
`
`A postmarketing requirement (PMR) addressing the Pediatric Research Equity Act
`(PREA) requirement to ensure a pediatric-appropriate formulation is recommended to
`ensure a lower dose (6.25mg) of SHP465 is available for pediatric patients within two
`years post approval.
`
`Shire submitted a Pediatric Study Plan in their NDA resubmission, December 20, 2016,
`to study SHP465 in 4 to 5 year old preschool attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
`patients and to manufacture a lower dose formulation, 6.25mg. The lowest dose of
`SHP465 to be approved in this application is 12.5mg.
`
`Prior to the NDA resubmission, on November 3, 2016, Shire submitted a Proposed
`Pediatric Study Request (PPSR). On, February 27, 2017, the Agency issued an
`inadequate letter denoting the need for the pediatric study plan to address decreased
`appetite and insomnia in the preschool population, based on preliminary review of the
`clinical study report for 6 to 12 years in the NDA (SHP465-305). On March, 17, 2017,
`Shire submitted a revised PPSR including an updated pediatric study plan. That PPSR
`is currently under review. The Applicant may decide not to pursue the PPSR if the
`timing for when the approval of NDA 22063 and the pediatric exclusivity do not align.
`
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`7
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`Therefore, a PMR to formulate a 6.25mg dose and to evaluate its safety and efficacy in
`the 4 to 5 year old preschool population is important. Additionally, we will require a
`PMR to evaluate the 6.25mg dose of SHP465 for the 6 to 12 year old ADHD population.
`In Section 7.2.1, I will discuss my concerns about the plasma concentration levels of the
`pediatric patients compared to adults receiving SHP465 12.5mg.
`
`2 Introduction and Regulatory Background
`
`2.1 Product Information
`SHP465 (proposed trade name: Mydayis) is an extended-release capsule of mixed salts
`of a single-entity amphetamine. It was previously known as SPD465. It is an oral
`product comprised of four amphetamine salts: dextro- and levoamphetamine sulfate,
`dextroamphetamine saccharate, and amphetamine aspartate monohydrate. The ratio
`of d- to l- isomers is three to one (3:1). The extended-release capsule contains three
`types of drug-releasing beads, which provide immediate-release, pulsatile delayed-
`release, and delayed, extended-release of the mixed amphetamine salts. The mixed
`salts of a single-entity amphetamine are the same active ingredient in Adderall XR.
`SHP465 is intended to last for sixteen hours.
`
`
`2.2 Tables of Currently Available Treatments for Proposed Indications
`
`All of the drug products listed below are approved for ADHD in children over 6 years
`old, adolescents, and adults.
`Table 1: Drugs approved for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
`Stimulants
`Non-stimulant
`Drug name
`Drug name
`amphetamine
`atomoxetine
`mixed salts of a
`single-entity
`clonidine
`amphetamine
`dextroamphetamine guanfacine
`dexmethylphenidate
`lisdexamfetamine
`methylphenidate
`[Source: Reviewer created]
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`8
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`2.3 Availability of Proposed Active Ingredient in the United States
`
`Currently, the active ingredients in SHP465, mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine,
`are available under the trade name Adderall and Adderall XR. Both formulations are
`
`approved for the treatment of ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults.
`
`2.4 Important Safeg Issues With Consideration to Related Drugs
`
`The stimulants for the treatment of ADHD have class warnings that are applicable to
`SHP465. The boxed warning about abuse and dependence of stimulants warns about
`choosing patients who are less likely to abuse stimulants. The class warnings about
`serious cardiovascular reactions, including sudden death, are applicable, especially to
`adult patients. The warnings about heart rate increases are relevant to both pediatric
`patients and adults for SHP465. The class warning for seizure was not present in newly
`approved extended-release amphetamines; however, based on clinical trial data for
`SHP465, the seizure warning will be present in this label. Finally, the class warning
`about growth suppression is applicable to pediatric patients, as weight loss and
`decreased appetite was prominent in the Phase 3 SHP465 pediatric trial.
`
`
`
`2.5 Summa of Presubmission Re ulato Activi Related to Submission
`
`Regulatory History of IND 066329
`
`0 December 4, 2002: SPD465 was submitted as an lnvestigational New Drug
`(IND) 066329. No clinical holds were placed during the IND Phases of clinical
`development program.
`0 November 18, 2003: Shire met with the Agency on to discuss Phase 2 and
`Phase 3 development of SHP465 (formerly named SPD465). Three points were
`agreed to at that meeting.
`0 Shire may seek approval for four dosing strengths (12.5, 25, 37.5, and
`50mg)
`0)“)
`
`o Shire informed the Agency that one of the two planned duration of effect
`studies was to be conducted in adolescents in order to support an
`adolescent duration of effect claim.
`
`0 Further, the Agency informed Shire that a Pediatric Written Request for
`adolescents aged 13 to 17 would not be issued, following advice from the
`Office of Counter Terrorism and Pediatric Drug Development that SHP465
`would not provide a significant public health benefit over existing
`therapies.
`0 November 11, 2004: The Agency issued a letter in response to a Special
`Protocol Assessment on study SHP465-301. The proposed flexible-dose design
`was not adequate to establish dose response safety and efficacy so a fixed-dose
`study was recommended instead to establish cardiovascular safety in adults.
`
`Reference ID: 41 13852
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`0 November 18, 2005: Shire met with the Agency regarding the clinical
`implications of changes to the formulation of SHP465
`
`M"
`
`Hence, Shire
`reported that an additional Phase 2 study, Study SHP465-203, would establish
`the duration of effect in adults with the intended market formulation at the 25mg
`strength. The Agency agreed that duration of effect at the 25mg dose would
`translate to higher dose strengths.
`
`0 March 8, 2006: At a pre-NDA meeting, the Agency stated we would allow for
`consideration of a m“) to 16-hour duration of effect labeling claim for the adult
`dose ranges of 12.5mg to 75mg if the claim was supported by the data submitted
`to the NDA.
`
`Regulatory History of the Original NDA (0220631
`
`0
`
`July 21, 2006: The original NDA 022063 was submitted to FDA and filed
`September 5, 2006.
`0 August 29, 2006, September 7, 18, 29, 2006, October 9, 2006, November 9, 14,
`17, 29, 2006, January 22, 31, 2007, March 7, 2007 and April 10 and 27, 2007:
`Dates of amendments submitted to NDA 022063.
`
`0 April 2007: Shire sought a PREA partial waiver from pediatric studies for children
`less than age 12 as “clinicians are not likely to prescribe SHP465 in children 12
`years of age and below due to the long duration of effect, potentially leaving
`younger children to stay awake past their bedtime.” (Source: FDA Clinical
`Review April 15, 2007)
`0 May 18, 2007: The Agency issued an Approvable letter for original NDA 022063.
`The following major issues were outstanding:
`a. Clinical Pharmacology dissolution studies must be completed according to
`certain specifications.
`b. The Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA) was
`concerned with Adderall XR and SHP465 having the same established
`name and asked Shire to plan an educational campaign to discern the 12-
`hour product from the 16-hour product.
`c. Update the Periodic Safety Report with cases of abuse, misuse, and
`diversion.
`
`d. Revised draft labeling did not include the proposed 37.5 mg and 50 mg
`strengths because the Agency stated there was no additional efficacy at
`these higher doses and there were additional adverse events associated
`with these higher doses. However if new information relating to the safety
`or effectiveness of SHP465 becomes available, revision of the labeling
`may be required.
`e. Postmarketing Commitment for studying exploration of dose response for
`effectiveness
`
`f. Postmarketing Commitment for studying exploration of cardiovascular risk
`
`Reference ID: 41 13852
`
`10
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`
`• May 24, 2007: Shire submitted a notice of intent to file an amendment to support
`approval but did not progress this activity further due to a business decision.
`
`
`
`Regulatory History of Class 2 Resubmission of NDA 022063
`• April 25, 2014: The Agency provided Written Responses Only (WRO) comments
`in which they classified Shire’s response to the SHP465 2007 Approvable Letter
`as a Class 2 resubmission of the original NDA 022063.
`Items addressed from the May 18, 2007, Approvable letter:
`a. Dissolution studies completed.
`b. Agreement on the educational plan for discerning between the three
`formulations of mixed salts of single-entity amphetamine (i.e., Adderall,
`Adderall XR, and the proposed product, Mydayis).
`c. Agreement on a voluntary risk management plan (not a REMS) to address
`abuse, misuse, and diversion.
`d. Agreement on Shire’s proposed study SHP465-306 to address safety and
`efficacy of 12.5, 25, 37.5, and 50mg doses in adults. The 75mg dose is not
`included due to increased adverse events without added efficacy.
`e. Agreement that the cardiovascular risk study was not necessary. After seven
`years since the 2007 Approvable letter, the Agency already has data on
`cardiovascular risk of amphetamines.
`• August 4, 2014: A teleconference was held to discuss SHP465 and the need for
`pediatric premarketing studies before making a Class 2 resubmission.
`• June 17, 2015: The Agency issued meeting minutes from the cancelled June 8,
`2015, Type C meeting. There was final agreement on the Phase 3 study in
`adults (Study SHP465-306) and discussion of pathways for NDA resubmission.
`• July 27, 2015: WRO comments issued to Shire regarding adequacy of the abuse
`potential evaluation.
`• February 13, 2016: WRO comments issued to Shire’s questions regarding the
`effects of alcohol on the bioavailability of the drug product, studies comparing the
`pharmacokinetics of several dosages of SHP465 and Adderall XR to clarify the
`recommended dose range and abuse potential, and additional product stability
`data for 48 months and less to address concerns about the dose range proposal
`planned for NDA resubmission.
`• July 14, 2016: A Type C meeting was held to obtain the Agency’s concurrence
`on the presentation and content of the NDA resubmission.
`• December 20, 2016: Shire resubmitted NDA 22063; a 6-month review clock
`started.
`• January 17, 2017: The Agency issued an acknowledgment letter of the Class 2
`NDA resubmission.
`
`•
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`11
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`Proprietary Name
`. The NDA
`Shire’s original NDA submission contained a proposed trade name
`resubmission and formal Proprietary Name Request for Review dated January 17,
`2017, contains a different proposed trade name, Mydayis. The trade name Mydayis is
`acceptable to DMEPA.
`
`See Section 2.6 for a table of studies submitted and reviewed under the original NDA
`22063. The Applicant submitted seven Phase 1 studies in adults; three Phase 2
`studies, one in adolescents (SHP465-202) and two in adults; and three Phase 3 trials in
`adults.
`
`This review will concentrate on the two new Phase 3 trials in the December 20, 2016,
`resubmission.
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`12
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`2.6 Other Relevant Background Information
`Table 2: Studies Reviewed in Original NDA July 2006
`
`
`Type of
`Study
`
`Study
`ID
`
`Objective(s) of
`the Study
`
`Study Design and
`Type of Control
`
`Test Product(s); Dosage
`Regimen;
`Route of Administration
`
`No. of
`Subjects
`Enrolled
`
`Healthy
`Subjects or
`Diagnosis
`
`Duration of Tx
`
`BA/BE
`
`101
`
`BA/BE
`
`102
`
`Phase 1, randomized,
`open- label, 4-way
`crossover,
`4 periods
`
`Phase 1, randomized,
`open- label, 4-way
`crossover,
`5 periods
`
`Assess PK
`profiles and
`bioequivalence of
`3 SHP465
`delayed- release
`(DR) bead
`prototypes vs.
`ADDERALL
`
`Assess PK
`profiles of 3
`SHP465 DR
`composite
`formulations vs.
`ADDERALL XR
`Safety,
`tolerability, effect
`of food on
`bioavailability
`
`12
`
`20
`
`•SHP465 12.5 mg
`1×12.5 mg DR bead prototype
`1,1×12.5 mg DR bead prototype
`2,1×12.5 mg DR bead prototype
`3
`•1×10 mg (tablet) ADDERALL l
`Capsule, oral
`Pilot formulation
`
`•1×20 mg ADDERALL XR and
`2×5 mg Capsule C (fed)
`•1×15 mg Capsule A and
`3×5 mg Capsule C (fed)
`•1×15 mg Capsule B and
`3×5 mg Capsule C (fed)
`•1×20 mg ADDERALL XR followed
`by 1×10 mg ADDERALL 8 h later
`Capsule, oral
`Pilot formulation
`
`Healthy
`Adults
`(fasting)
`
`Healthy
`Adults
`18-55 years,
`inclusive
`
`4 single doses
`(Periods
`1-4;
`7-day washout
`between
`periods)
`
`5 single doses
`(Periods
`1-4 fed; Period
`5 fasted;
`7-day washout
`between
`periods)
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`13
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`
`Type of
`Study
`
`Study
`ID
`
`Objective(s) of
`the Study
`
`Study Design and
`Type of Control
`
`Test Product(s); Dosage
`Regimen;
`Route of Administration
`
`No. of
`Subjects
`Enrolled
`
`Healthy
`Subjects or
`Diagnosis
`
`Duration of Tx
`
`PK
`
`103
`
`Assess PK
`profile vs.
`ADDERALL XR
`Safety
`
`Phase 1,
`randomized, open-
`label, single-dose,
`2-treatment crossover
`2 periods
`
`•SHP465 37.5 mg
`1×37.5 mg (fasted)
`•1×25 mg ADDERALL XR (fasted)
`followed by 1×12.5 mg MAS IR
`8 h later
`Capsule, oral
`Intended to market formulation
`
`BA
`
`105
`
`Assess the effect
`of a high-fat meal
`on
`bioavailability
`relative to fasted
`state
`Safety and
`tolerability
`
`Phase 1,
`randomized, open-
`label,
`3-way crossover
`3 periods
`
`•SHP465 50 mg
`1×50 mg (fasted),
`1×50 mg (fed high fat
`meal),1×50 mg (fasted, sprinkled
`1 tbsp applesauce) Capsule, oral
`Intended to market formulation
`
`PK
`
`106
`
`Assess dose
`proportionality
`Safety and
`tolerability
`
`Phase 1, open-label,
`single-ascending
`doses, 4 periods
`
`•SHP465 12.5-75 mg
`1×12.5 mg,1×37.5 mg,1×50 mg,
`1×75 mg
`Capsule, oral
`Intended to market formulation
`
`20
`
`16
`
`28
`
`Healthy
`Adults
`18-
`55 years,
`inclusive
`
`2 single
`doses
`(Periods
`1,2;
`7-day washout
`between
`periods)
`
`Healthy
`Adults
`18-55 years,
`inclusive
`
`3 single doses
`(Periods
`1-3;
`7-day washout
`between
`periods)
`
`Healthy
`Adults
`18-55 years,
`inclusive
`
`Single dose (4
`planned
`periods,
`7-day washout
`between
`periods)
`
`Reference ID: 4113852
`
`14
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Nancy Dickinson, PharmD.
`NDA 022063
`Mydayis (mixed salts of a single-entity amphetamine extended release capsule)
`
`
`Type of
`Study
`
`Study
`ID
`
`Objective(s) of
`the Study
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket