throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`22-044
`
`STATISTICAL REVIEW! S!
`
`

`

`Office of Biostatistics
`
`US. Department of Health and Human Services
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluan'on and Re5earch
`Office of Translational Science
`
`STATISTICAL REVIEW AND EVALUATION.
`
`CLINICAL STUDIES
`
`NDA/Serial Number:
`
`22_044
`
`Drug Name:
`
`Indication(s):
`
`Applicant:
`
`Date(s):
`
`(Sitagliptin Phosphate/Metformin Hydrochloride Fixed Dose
`Janumet
`Combination Tablet) 50/500 and 50/ 1000 mg/mg sitagliptin/metformin
`
`An adjunct to diet and'exercise to improve glycemic control in patients
`with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not adequately controlled on
`metformin or sitagliptin alone or in patients already being treated with the
`combination of sitagliptin and metformin
`
`Merck & Co, Inc.
`
`Received 05/3 l /06; user fee (10 months) 03 /31 /07
`
`Review Priority:
`
`Standard
`
`Biometrics Division:
`
`Division of Biometrics 2
`
`Statistical Reviewer:
`
`Lee—Ping-Pian, Ph.D.
`
`\
`
`Concurring Reviewers:
`
`Todd Sahlroot, PhD. Biometrics Team Leader
`Thomas Permutt, Ph.D. Division Director
`
`'
`
`Medical Division:
`
`Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products (DNEEP)
`
`Clinical Team:
`
`Project Manager:
`
`Ilan Irony, M.D.
`Mary Parks, M.DI Division Director
`Lina Aljuburi, Pharm D.
`
`Keywords: New Drug Application (NDA) review, clinical studies
`
`

`

`Table ofContents
`
`1.1
`
`2.
`
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 2
`
`1.1 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................... 2
`
`LABELING COMMENTS..-....................................................................................................... 2
`
`1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`
`‘
`
`1.1 Conclusions and Recommendations
`
`The statistical review provides labeling comments only. The efficacy review for this NDA can be
`referenced to the statistical review for Januvia (NDA 21—995). Specifically, the original statistical review
`concerned protocol 020, a multinational, double-blind, randomized, parallel group Phase III study to
`evaluate the safety and efficacy of MK—043l 100 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who
`have inadequate glycemic control on metformin therapy.
`
`2. LABELING COMMENTS
`
`1. The second study (protocol 015) should not be included in the clinical studies section. The
`study was a cross-over PD assessment of 24—hour plasma glucose values in 28 patients after
`4 weeks of treatment. It was not reviewed as a well controlled clinical study.
`
`2.
`
`I"
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`

`

`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`/s/
`‘
`'
`
`Lee—Ping Pian
`3/2/2007 04:04:01 PM
`BIOMETRICS
`
`' Todd Sahlroot
`3/5/2007 08:08:40 AM
`BIOMETRICS
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket