throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`22-044
`22-044
`
`
`PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW(S)
`PHARMACOLOGY REVIEWQS!
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY REVIEW AND EVALUATION
`
`NDA NUMBER:
`
`SERIAL NUMBER:
`
`DATE RECEIVED BY CENTER:
`PRODUCT:
`
`22-044
`
`000
`
`31 May 2006
`Janumet
`
`(Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination)
`
`INTENDED CLINICAL POPULATION:
`SPONSOR:
`
`Type 2 Diabetics
`Merck
`
`DOCUMENTS REVIEWED:
`
`eCTD
`
`REVIEW DIVISION:
`
`Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Products
`
`PHARM/I‘OX SUPERVISOR:
`
`Todd Bourcier, Ph.D.
`
`DIVISION DIRECTOR:
`
`PROJECT MANAGER:
`
`Mary Parks, M.D.
`
`Lina Aljuburi, Pharm. D., M.S.
`
`Date of review submission to Division File System (DFS):
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`........... 3
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`I.
`Recommendations ........................'............................................................................................. 3
`II.
`Summary of non-clinical findings .......................
`............ 4
`A.
`Brief overview of non-clinical findings....................., ............................................................ 4
`B.
`Non-clinical safety issues relevant to clinical use .................................................................. 7
`
`2.6 PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY REVIEW ................................................... 8
`
`INTRODUCTION AND DRUG HISTORY................................................................... 8
`2.6.1
`2.6.6.8
`Special toxicology studies
`............................................................................................... '10
`MK—0431 + Metformin: Combination Toxicity Studies in Dogs................................................. lO
`MK—0431 + Metformiu: 14 week oral toxicity study in dogs ...................................................... 10
`Exploratory 5-week oral tolerability' study with Metformin in female dogs ............................. 21
`MK—0431 + Metformin: 16 week oral toxicity in female dogs ..................................................... 25
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier= PhD.
`
`NDA No. 22-044
`
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`
`1. Recommendations
`
`A. Recommendation on approvability
`AP A roval
`Pharmacology/Toxicology recommends approval of NDA 22-044 (Janumet)
`
`B. Recommendation for nonclinical studies
`
`No additional nonclinical studies are required.
`
`C. Recommendations on labeling
`The proposed labeling language relevant to phannacologY/toxicology has been
`accurately reproduced from the approved labels for Januvia and Glucophage. No
`further changes are recommended.
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 22-044
`
`II. Summary of non-clinical findings
`
`A. Brief overview of non-clinical findings
`
`Non-clinical studies with the fixed-dose combination product were not performed.
`Potential toxicity unique to the combination of sitagliptin phosphate (MK-0431) and
`metformin was evaluatedin dogs co-administered each drug separately. The combination
`of MK-0431 and high-dose metformin (50 mg/kg) in dogs may have resulted in more
`numerous and earlier deaths than observed with metformin alone. The combination of
`MK-0431 and a lower dose of metformin (20 mg/kg) that better approximates human
`exposure of 2,500mg/day resulted in no deaths and yielded no evidence of exacerbated
`toxicity. Convincing evidence is provided that the deaths at 50 mg/kg are due to
`metformin toxicity and not to the combination. Nevertheless, there is a slight possibility
`of exacerbated toxicity in the setting of high metformin exposure (2 40011M*h AUC) and
`clinical exposure to MK—043l (~10uM*h AUC).
`
`The jbllowing summary is takenfrom the pharmacology/toxicology review for Januvia,
`NDA 21-995.
`
`Pharmacology
`MK-0431 (sitagliptin phosphate) is a competitive inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase 4
`(DPP4), an enzyme principally responsible for degrading incretin peptides, glucagon—like
`peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropicpeptide (GIP). MK—043l
`prolongs incretin half-life and biological activity and thus potentiates glucose-dependent
`_ insulin release and delays gastric emptying. In non-clinical models of diabetes, MK-0431
`moderates glucose excursion and improves insulin release and islet cell function/mass
`without provoking hypoglycemia MK-043118 body weight-,neutral unlike marketed
`glitazones (weight gain) and GLP—1 analogues (weight loss).
`Immunomodulatory effects‘of DPP4 (aka CD26) are reportedly not altered by MK-
`0431, based on normal responses of murine T— and B-cells to antigens and mitogens.
`However, rodent DPP4/CD26 differs in some aspects from human DPP4/CD26 (e.g.,
`binding of adenosine deaminase) and Merck’s experiments did not directly test the T-
`helper memory function ascribed to CD26. Therefore, the non-clinical data do not
`adequately predict potential effects of MK-O431 on DPP4/CD26’s role in human
`immunity.
`
`Safety pharmacology assessment of neurological, renal, pulmonary, and
`gastrointestinal effects of MK-0431 did not identify any significant liabilities.
`
`Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion
`An oral dose of MK-0431 is rapidly absorbed and is 60-90% bioavailable in rats and
`dogs. MK-0431 distributes to most rat tissues with low amounts distributing to the brain,
`eyes, and bone. Plasma protein binding is moderate (30%). Metabolism of MK-0431 is
`minimal with 80% of unchanged parent compound being eliminated in the urine of rats,
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 22-044
`
`dogs, and humans. Oxidative metabolism by CYP3A4 and 2C8 is a minor metabolic
`pathway. MK-0431 has a longer plasma half-life in humans (13hrs) than in rats and dogs
`(2-5hrs) probably due to different rates of renal elimination. MK-0431 slightly
`accumulates in humans but not in dogs or rats after multiple dosing.
`
`MK-0431 is a P-glycoprotein and hOAT3 substrate, but does not interfere in the
`shuttling of other substrates via these transporters in vitro. MK-O43l does not inhibit
`CYP450 enzymes or induce CYP3A4. The results predict a low probability for
`pharmacokinetic drug interactions via these pathways.
`
`General Toxicology (MRHD, Maximum Recommended Human Dose, or 100mg)
`
`Single dose studies identified minimum lethal doses of 2000mg/kg (200-400x lVRHD) in
`mice and 3000mg/kg (150-300x MRHD) in rats. Little other toxicological information
`was obtained in these studies.
`
`Repeat dose studies were conducted in Sprague—Dawley rats and Beagle dogs up to 6
`months and 12 months duration, respectively.
`
`A high—dose 3-month study in rats identified kidney and liver necrosis, myocardial
`degeneration, bone marrow necrosis, and death at 1500 and 2000mg/kg (150-200x
`MRHD). Kidney toxicity was also observed in mice at 500mg/kg. Note that exposure at
`these high doses is theoretically sufficient to inhibit off-target enzymes DPP8/9, proteases
`that are associated with these toxicities.
`
`Administration of doses up to 20x the MRHD for 6 months in rats did not elicit
`significant toxicity.
`
`Studies in dogs identified NOAEL doses based on clinical signs that consisted of
`reduced activity, hunched posture, ataxia, tremor, and sporadic emesis observed at
`50mg/kg (20x MRHD). Respiratory distress, described as audible and labored breathing
`and open-mouthed breathing, was also reported. Noconsistent target organs were
`identified in these studies.
`‘
`
`Administration ofdoses up to 5x the MRHD for up to 12 months in dogs did not elicit
`significant toxicity.
`
`Special Toxicology
`MK-O431 did not produce vascular/skin lesions in rhesus monkeys, as seen with some
`DPP4 inhibitors, after three months administration of doses up to 25x the MRHD.
`Mechanistic data provided by Merck suggests that inhibiting DPP4 activity alone is not
`sufficient to produce this toxicity.
`
`Reproductive Toxicology
`Exposure to MK-O43l in the definitive studies ranged from 12x to 90x MRHD in the
`rat and 6x to 50x in the rabbit. Resorptions and post—implantation losses increased in
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier Ph.D. NDA No. 22-044
`
`females in a fertility study at ~25x MRHD; male fertility was not effected. MK—043l was
`not teratogenic but increased the incidence of skeletal malformations in rat pups at
`maternally toxic doses. At maternally non-toxic doses, a single rat pup had multiple
`skeletal abnormalities (incidence within historical range), and a single rabbit pup had
`multiple cardiovascular abnormalities, but a relationship to drug treatment is not
`conclusive. MK—0431 crosses the placenta in rats and rabbits and is excreted in maternal
`milk at a 4:1 ratio to plasma. As with other oral hypoglycemic agents, MK-0431 should
`not be given to pregnant or nursing mothers and Merck will maintain a pregnancy
`register. Pregnancy Category ‘B’ is recommended.
`
`There were no conclusive drug-related effects on embryoniC/post—natal development
`in rats at 125mg/kg (12x MRHD) or in rabbits at 125mg/kg (20x MRHD).
`
`Genetic Toxicology
`MK-O431 was not mutagenic or clastogenic in three in vitro assays (Ames,
`hepatocyte alkaline elution, and chromosome aberration) and one in vivo assay (murine
`micronucleus induction).
`
`.
`Carcinogenicity
`Carcinogenic potential of MK—043l was evaluated in 2 year studies in
`mice and rats. Both studies adequately assessed carcinogenesis. MK-0431 significantly
`increased the incidence of combined liver adenoma/carcinoma in male and female rats,
`and increased liver carcinomas in female rats at 500mg/kg (62x MRHD). Non-genotoxic,
`_ chronic hepatotoxicity is the suggested etiological event but this is based on weak
`correlative evidenceof liver toxicity. MK—043l did not produce any drug-related tumors
`in CD—1 mice up to 500mg/kg (72x MRHD). MK-0431 poses a minimal carcinogenic risk
`to humans.
`‘
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier PhD. NDA No. 22-044 . I
`
`
`
`
`
`B. Non-clinical safety issues relevant to clinical use
`
`1. DPP4 cleaves several substrates in addition to GLP-l. Therefore, MK-O431 may
`have undesirable effects related to inhibiting cleavage of non-incretin substrates.
`Effects on human immunity, specifically recall responses to antigens and immune
`cell trafficking, may be adversely affected by DPP4 inhibition. This risk is an
`unavoidable characteristic of MK—0431 and the drug class. There is currently no
`clinical evidence of such effects with Januvia or with Janumet.
`
`I
`
`MK-0431 presents a marginal clinical risk of producing skin lesions with
`prolonged administration. This conclusion is based on the absence of skin
`findings in the 3-m0nth monkey study, on mechanistic data suggesting that
`inhibiting DPP4 activity alone is not sufficient to produce this toxicity, and on the
`high DPP4 selectivity of MK-043l at clinical exposure. Risk assessment for skin
`lesions must be done on a case—by-case basis and is not evidence of similar safety
`with other DPP4 inhibitors currently in clinical development.
`
`Issues specific for the combination of Januvia and metformin include the finding
`of excess deaths of dogs administered pharmacologically high doses of metformin
`and a clinically relevant dose of sitagliptin. Convincing evidence is provided that
`the deaths at 50 mg/kg are due to metformin toxicity and not to the combination.
`Nevertheless, there is a slight possibility of exacerbated toxicity in the setting of
`high metformin exposure (2 400uM*h AUC) and clinical exposure to MK-O43l
`(~10uM*h AUC).
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`

`

`
`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier PhD.
`
`NDA No. 22-044
`
`2.6 PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGYREVIEW
`
`2.6.1
`
`INTRODUCTION AND DRUG HISTORY
`
`' NDA number: 22-044
`' Review number:
`1
`
`Sequence number/date/type of submission: SNOOO / 31 May 2006
`Information to sponsor: Yes (X) No ( )
`Sponsor and/or agent:
`, Merck Research Laboratories
`Manufacturer for drug substance: Merck Facilities
`Reviewer name: Todd Bourcier
`
`. Division name: Metabolic and Endocrine Products
`HFD #:
`510
`
`Review completion date: 28 Feb 2007
`
`Drug:
`
`Janumet
`Trade name:
`Generic name: Sitagliptin phosphate and Metformin HCl
`Fixed Dose Combination
`
`. Sitagliptinphosphate:
`Trade name: Januvia
`
`Code name: MK-0431, sitagliptin phosphate
`Chemical name: 7-[(3R)—3 -amin0—l-ox0-4-(2,4,S-trifluorophenyl)butyl]-5,6,7,8—
`tetrahydro-[3-(trifluoromethyl)—l,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazine
`phosphate (1: l) monohydrate ‘
`CAS registry number: 654671-77-9
`Molecular formula/molecular weight: C16H15F5N50 ° H3PO4 ' H20 /523.32 MW
`Structure:
`
`RTIK a“ NH, 0
`/
`~‘k/u\“/"\V¢M\
`l\,'l I“ ~ H390,
`
`~ 3,0
`
`Metformin HCI:
`
`Chemical name: N,N-dimethylimidodicarbonimidic diamide hydrochloride
`CAS registry number:
`Molecular formula/molecular weight: C4H11N5~HCll 165.6 MW
`Structure:
`.
`9 ca:-
`>
`ti
`‘
`“J .
`
`2
`
`‘flCl
`
`ii
`
`HE
`
`14H
`
`Mi
`
`

`

`
`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 22-044
`
`Relevant INDs/NDAs/DMFS:
`
`1. NDA 21-995 (Januvia)
`2. NDA 20-357 (Glucophage)
`
`Drug class: Oral antihyperglycemic agents
`
`Intended clinical population: Type II diabetics
`
`Clinical formulation: Film-coated tablets containing 50 mg sitgliptin phosphate and 500
`mg metformin hydrochloride (Janumet 50/500) or 1000 mg metformin hydrochloride
`(Janumet 50/1000). Inactive ingredients include microcrystalline cellulose,
`polyvinylpyroolidone, sodium lauryl slfate, and sodium stearyl fumarate.
`
`Route of administration: Oral
`
`'Maxim um Recommended Human Dose: Twice daily dosing of Janumet 50/1000 will
`provide 100mg sitagliptin phosphate and a maximum of 2000mg metformin.
`
`Disclaimer: Tabular and graphical information are constructed by the reviewer unless
`cited otherwise.
`
`Studies reviewed within this submission:
`
`MK-0431 + Metformin: Combination Toxicity Studies in Dogs
`MK-0431 + Metformin: 14 week oral toxicity study in dogs
`Exploratory 5-week oral tolerability study with Metformin in female dogs .
`MK-0431 + Metformin: 16 week oral toxicity in female dogs
`
`Studiesn_ot reviewed within this submission:
`
`All other pharmacology/toxicology studies relevant to evaluation of Janumet have been
`reviewed previously and are publicly available under NDA 21,995 for Januvia
`(sitagliptin) and under NDA 20,357 for Glucophage (metformin).
`
`09.06013: Thlg
`.
`W?“
`0“ OFianelé W
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier PhD. NDA No. 22-044
`
`2.6.6.8 Special toxicology studies
`
`MK—0431 + Metformin: Combination Toxicity Studies in Dogs
`
`_
`Summary
`A series of studies evaluated the potential toxicity of MK—043l administered in
`combination with metformin to dogs. The combination of MK-043l and high-dose
`metformin (50 mg/kg) in dogs may have resulted in more numerous and earlier deaths
`than observed with metformin alone (Study #TT 06-6000). The combination of MK-O431
`and a lower dose of metformin (20 mg/kg) that better approximates human expOsure
`resulted in no deaths and yielded no evidence of exacerbated toxicity (Study #TT 06-
`6017). Convincing. evidence is provided that the deaths at 50 mg/kg are due to metformin
`toxicity and not to the combination (Study #TT 06-6018) . Nevertheless, there is a slight,
`possibility of exacerbated toxicity in the setting of high exposure to metformin (Z
`400uM*h AUC) and clinical exposure to MK-043l (Z lOuM*h AUC). ’
`
`MK-0431 + Metformin: 14 week oral toxicity study in dogs
`50 mg/kg Metformin and 2, 10, 50 mg/kg MK-O43l
`
`Key study findings:
`
`0 Mortality occurred in females of all combination groups and the metformin-alone
`group. Deaths with the combination appear more numerous and occur earlier than
`with the metformin-alone group.
`
`0 Mortality occurred in females only; all males survived to termination.
`
`o The metformin-alone death may be due to lactic acidosis, indicated by high
`plasma lactate and low bicarbonate.
`
`- Earlier deaths with the combination are not adequately explained.
`
`i
`0 Three deaths in the MI) and HD combination groups showed vacuolation in the
`brain with one of the three also showing neuronal. necrosis; degenerative changes
`in brain are reported in dogs administered metformin (NDA 20-537).
`
`0 Exposure to MK-O43l is not altered by co-administration of metformin.
`
`0 Exposure to Metformin tends to be 50% higher in females co-administered MK-
`0431 than. metformin alone. However, TK comes from a single female in the MD
`and HD groups, so only tentative conclusions can be drawn. There is no
`difference in males.
`
`10
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier, PhD.
`
`‘
`
`. INDA No. 22-044
`
`Reviewer Comments
`
`Merck concludes that all deaths are related to metformin toxicity and not to exacerbated
`toxicity with the combination The data1n this study do not support that conclusion
`because earlier deaths with the combination are not adequately explained To the
`contrary, the death of one female given metformin alone was associated with a 50%
`higher metformin AUC than the females given the combination, yet deaths were observed
`in all groups except control.
`
`Nevertheless, it is feasible that the deaths are related to metformin toxicity for the
`following reasons:
`
`1. Plasma lactate tended to be higher in surviving dogs and was clearly higher in 2
`dogs in the HD combination group, though this may be related to morbidity.
`
`2. The minimally toxic dose of metformin in dogs is. 50mg/kg, with death1n 50% to
`100% of animals at > 100mg/kg (IND 5934, NBA 20357), indicating a sharp
`dose response curve.
`
`3. Metformin exposure in females was higher in this study (2 500pg*h/ml) than
`reported in the metformin NDA (~300 pg*h/ml). Exposure in males was similar
`to females on day l but decreased by week 8.
`
`Exacerbated toxicity of the MK-0431/Metformin combination cannot be excluded based
`on this data, but neither can it be confirmed.
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier PhD.
`
`.
`
`NDA No. 22-044
`
`Study no.1 TT 06-6000
`Volume #, and page #: eCTD
`Conducting laboratory and location: MRL, Chibret, France
`GLP compliance: French Ministry of Health GLP standard
`QA report: yes ( x ) no ( )
`'
`Drug, lot #, and % purity:
`MK-0431, lot L-000224715-010X029
`Metformin, lot L-000282095-001L012, from
`Wpurity by HPLC (manufacturer’s data)
`
`
`
`Methods
`
`
`
`
` cmmmgmc c515; -_ _ '
`
`
`
`
`MIC-0431 éPJlttet'fofiiiih
`
`
`0 + 50.xnwgfdayh.
`
`.3i3
`2 +50 mgfkg’dhyc
`l
`
`z-~
`5. no+svmgzk§¢aw
`Wigwam
`:..__:.w~1.m.,_i,_._m§..m
`
`l
`5‘ Control animals received fink-kg of acidified deionized water followed by
`
`S luLékg of0;5% (my) methyleellulofise in deionized \mter daily.
`.
`'g *3 Animals: received Smulrgof acidified deimrized “ale: filllowcd by S nil/kg
`

`{
`ofMetthrmajndosing {emulationdaily.
`V
`'
`
`%
`‘3 Animals received 5 man of mums! dosing fommlmion tbllowcd by
`i
`< 11:]:le ofzvletfonuin dosing fomiulnlionjdail >1
`'-
`’
`
`
`
`
`
`
`'
`40-42 weeks
`Age:
`
`
` Weight:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Blood collected after the first dose and in drug week 8
`
`‘ Recoveg groups: No recovery
`
`
`
`ll
`
`
`
`
`Route formulation
`
`
`dose volume
`
`
`
`Oral gavage of both drugs, MK-0431 first, then metformin
`MK—0431 in acidified water
`Metformin in 0.5% meth [cellulose in water
`
`
`
`
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1Reviewer: Todd Bourcier PhD. NBA No. 22-044
`
`Observation and Times:
`
`'
`
`Clinical Findings: Daily observations
`
`Body weights: Pretest and then weekly
`
`
`
`Ophthalmoscopy Pretest, drug weeks 6 and 12
`
`Pretest, drug weeks 6 and 12
`
`Hematology: Pretest, drug weeks 4, 9, and 12, fasted state
`
`
`
`
`
`-
`
` ‘
`
`Clinical chemistry:
`
`~
`Pretest, drug weeks 4, 9, and 12
`Lactate and bicarbonate done on week 6, 9, and 12
`
`
`
`' Some frozen samples from week 4 analyzed in week 6 for
`bicarbonate and serum electrol
`es
`
`
`
`
`
`ysis: Overnight urmes collected in drug weeks 9 and 12
`
`Gross pathology: Complete necropsrcs on all scheduled/unscheduled deaths
`
`prostate, spleen, testes, thyroid
`From control, metformin alone, and high dose MK-
`.
`. Histopathology. 0431/metformin
`Also from found dead/earl
`
`sacrifice animals
`
`yes ( X): “0 ()
`
`
`
`
` Adequate Battery:
`yeSO, n0 (X) Peer review:
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`13
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier, PhD.
`
`i
`
`NDA No. 22-044
`
`Results:
`
`Mortality: Deaths occurred in all treated groups including metformin alone (Table 1).
`There was one death each in the metformin alone group and the low dese MK-
`043 l/metformin group, and two deaths each in the m-id- and high-dose MK-
`0431/metformin groups. Deaths in the combination groups occurred earlier (1-4 weeks)
`than the metformin alone group (week 6).
`
`Note that only females were effected; mortality did not occur in males.
`
`Females 05-0121 and 05-0l43 showed severe physical signs, including lateral
`recumbency, limb paddling, rigidity, labored breathing and prostration.
`
`'
`
`Females 05-0133 and 05-0137 showed body weight loss, markedly reduCed food intake,
`and anorexia
`
`
`
`Table 1: Mortality in female dogs administered MK-0431 andMetformin
`.
`Group
`Animal
`Drug Week
`Found Deadlor' 'V H '
`V
`(Dose in mg/kg/day)
`Number
`of Death
`Early Sacrifice Death/R asonKilled
`
`'V Metformin (50)
`05-0133‘F
`6
`__ES'
`‘
`' Bod" weightless
`
`-."MK-04%i+
`'- 05-0137F
`
`
`
`f 05:01:}: '_'_’
`‘
`g
`__
`V
`'V
`"
`054012351?
`'25
`050143F -
`Animal diedprior to euthanasia:for earlySacrifice
`17—.EarlyiSacrificed
`
`etermin'edi'
`VUndthennined“
`.--.':“..-i:;;Undet’erinined .
`'
`'
`.
`'
`~
`
`'
`
`'
`
`’
`
`=Fo_un‘d Dead.
`
`Histological changes in early sacrifice females #05-0121, ~01 l l, and -0143 included
`vacuolation of the brain in all three and neuronal necrosis in #05-0143. NOte that two of
`these dogs are in the MD combo group and the one with vacuolation and neuronal
`necrosis is in the HD combo group. Hemorrhage was not reported in these individuals.
`No other early death or surviving dogs showed histological changes in brain. Metformin
`administration to dogs has been associated with degenerative changes in the brain, among
`otherorgans (ref. NDA ."'~
`
`Other histological changes found only in early sacrifice females include lymphoid
`depletion of Peyer’s patch, lymph nodes, and thymus, and adrenal vacuolation (If).
`
`I Merck concludes that the deaths are related to metformin alone and not to co-treatment
`with MK-0431, citing lactic acidosis as a likely mechanism. As evidence, the metformin-
`
`l4
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier PhD. ‘ NDA No. 22-044
`
`alone death was associated with high plasma lactate and low bicarbonate prior to sacrifice
`in week 6 compared to the control group. Unfortunately, plasma lactate was not measured
`in 3 other combination-group deaths where frozen samples were available from week 4.
`Bicarbonate tended to be lower in those samples, but not substantially. Changes in
`lactate/bicarbonate in surviving animals is discussed under the clinical chemistry section.
`
`The data indicate lactic acidosis as a possible cause of death in the metformin-alone
`group, but is not conclusive as to the cause of deaths in the combination groups.
`
`I?
`
`$33,$5?
`
`
`Egg.r
`Dog number
`
`asmmmesw
`Plasma Lactate
`a.r
`
`Bicarbonate (mM)
`
`CONTROL
`
`‘
`
`group average
`
`23.9
`
`
`
`LD MK-043 l/metformin
`
`05-0137F
`
`MD MK-043 l/metformin
`
`.
`HD MK-043 l/metformin
`
`05-0121F
`
`05-01 1 IF
`
`'
`
`05-01st
`
`05 -0 143F
`
`nd = sample not taken (05-0137 & -0121) or not analyzed (05-0111, —0125, & -0143)
`
`Clinical signs:
`
`Males and females in all treatment groups (excluding control) showed physical signs
`starting in drug weeks 1/2. Signs included salivation and occasional emeSis shortly afier
`dosing, and an increased incidence of unformed stools. There was no difference noted
`between the dose groups relative to these clinical signs.
`
`In the high dose MK-O431/metformin group, ataxia and. tremors were observed in 2
`females and 1 male shortly after dosing but the signs subsided within 4-6 hours. The
`transient ataxia/tremors associated with dosing were observed from drug weeks 1 to 3.
`This CNS effect has been identified in several previous toxicity studies in beagle dogs
`administered 50 mg/kg.
`'
`
`15
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 22-044
`
`Body weights:
`
`Death of females #05-0133 and 05-0137 from the metformin-alone and LD MK-
`0431/metformin group was associated with a 1 to 2 kg loss in body weight by drug week
`2 and' 5, respectively, consistent with reduced food intake and anorexia in these
`individuals.
`'
`
`Treated females generally gained less weight than the control females except for the
`individual in the HD MK-043 l/metformin group. Males administered the combination
`tended to gain less weight than the control of metformin—alone males, but the data is
`variable and not dose-dependent.
`‘
`
`The data are not conclusiveas to an effect on BW in surviving dogs, though the data in
`males suggests some effect with combination treatment.
`
`
`
`‘
`
`Females
`
`I
`
`i
`
`I
`
`H Males
`
`043 l/metformin
`
`0.5
`
`0.5
`
`Metformin
`
`LD MK-
`043 1/metformin
`
`MD MK-
`043 1/metforrnin
`HD MK-
`
`Food consumption: Aside from reduced food consumption in the moribund females
`described above, there was no difference in food intake between the treated and control
`groups.
`
`Ophthalmoscopy: There were no treatment-related changes reported.
`
`
`. EKG: There were no treatment-related changes reported. Note that primary data was not
`submitted.
`
`Hematology: There were no treatment-related changes relative to RBC, WBC, and
`coagulation variables.
`
`16
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier PhD. NDA No. 22-044
`
`
` — A—M———
`
`———
`_——-
`
`
`
`—-m-m
`
`
`*Plasma lactatein dog #05-0138 was 37 and 31 mg/dL at weeks 9,12 respectively, skewing the
`mean upward.
`
`Historical Control Values for Dogs, Plasma Lactate and Bicarbonate
`
`
`
`Hiatocicall‘ongrotxraluw (or Dag {§6~?Bbf2606 to zo-gebazoos}
`'Aqe-v
`3
`'.
`V'
`-
`,
`'
`Nc.- of Ho; iaf
`mmn '
`Range of
`"
`Tenth
`333335319
`Value
`Actual Value:
`Qicarbwte Micki-L
`.
`7. 4
`18 . .7
`23
`, 23a:
`13.7
`
`73
`73
`.
`74
`74
`
`-
`
`'
`
`24.0
`24,0
`
`20.")
`20.7
`
`,
`
`V
`
`2.5!
`
`19.5
`1.9.5
`
`'
`
`26 .
`s
`9.5.6
`
`27.7
`27.7
`
`27.7
`27;?
`
`30.9
`20.9
`
`20.0
`min
`
`95% Spread
`97.5!
`
`25.4
`24;»;
`
`37.2:
`r7 2
`
`16.9
`24.9
`
`“”me
`22.9
`28.8
`
`w“
`5.5
`5.5
`
`”m" M“ "MM
`2.5.7
`28.7
`
`33,4
`33,4
`
`’32.:
`33.4
`
`418
`4.8
`
`33...
`33.2
`
`5.4 .
`5:4" »
`
`g
`
`,‘
`
`.
`
`13.21
`' 32.1
`
`'
`
`Female
`26 to 39 Weeks
`Cambium ages
`mm
`264:6 39 Make
`memes Agar.
`Both Sexes
`26 to 39 weeks
`Cambineé-Agei:
`
`
`'73
`‘73
`
`74
`‘M
`
`147
`14‘:
`
`.
`
`I i“
`Female
`.
`es tu_ 39' make
`.
`
`I
`
`“WWW“
`
`‘
`
`“
`_53
`53
`
`147
`'u‘l
`
`18.7
`23.5
`123.3
`18.7
`
`W m ma‘fie mgVBL
`.
`[53‘
`'
`~
`.12.).
`5‘3
`gig-.4.
`
`"m
`.59:
`5.4
`
`
`
`Urinalysis: Treated and control groups showed no difference in urinary volume, specific
`gravity, urobilinogen, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, or sediments.
`
`Gross pathology: Treated and control groups showed no difference. (scheduled
`sacrifices)
`
`Organ weights: Treated and control groups showed no difference. (scheduled sacrifices)
`
`18
`
`

`

`
`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier PhDi
`
`'
`
`NDA No. 22-044
`
`Histopathology:
`
`Histological changes were present onlyin early sacrifice females, and are described
`under the ‘Mortality’ section above
`
`To summarize, females #0540121 and -0111 had brain vacuolation and female 05-0143
`showed brain vacuolation and neuronal necrosis. Although these dogs are in the MD and
`HD combo groups, such changes in brain have been previously described in dogs
`following administration of metformin (ref. NDA "f'_‘_
`
`Other histological changes found only in early sacrifice females include lymphoid
`depletion of Peyer’s patch, lymph nodes, and thymus, and adrenal vacuolation (1t).
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`19
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier, PhD,
`
`NDA No. 22-044
`
`Toxicokinetics:
`
`MK-0_431: Exposure as AUC at all dose groups is consistent with TK from prior studies.
`.There is no sex difference, and exposure slightly decreases by drug week 8. Co-
`administration of metformin did not alter TK of MK-0431.
`
`Metformin: Exposure as AUC was ~50% higher in females given metformin alone
`compared to females given the combination, which may suggest some PK interaction in
`females. This was not seen in males. In addition, exposure in females tends to be higher
`than in males by drug week 8, though not substantially. Note that TK comes from a single
`female in the MD and HD groups, so only tentative conclusions can be drawn.
`
`Exposure to MK-0431
`
`" AUCum-m (axiom)
`
`
`501 e 50‘?
`
`
`22:30
`
`
`
`
`1 he s 1.6:
`' ChurxiWM}
`59.2; x 9,55
`2.2+: :.
`
`
`L3 .i 1.02
`
`
`71.0 $4.35
`36$ : 30.9 ,e
`1.1.6 20.5%.: i 53.7 i0.6;: g
`«xx :02,
`a7 2422
`
`
`:
`

`
`Mean Plasma MKJMM Texicokincxic annmersm Drug week 3
`
`M16043! *Mctfanhiu (in :‘k lduv)
`
`
`
`- Females
`
`
`108+ 506
`2n 4 50‘»
`semen)
`9.12 z (D
`:\UCQ.34 hr (”M-hr]
`
`s
`i
`
`
`
`log-:3)
`1.47210
`Cm»: (FM)
`318‘ ill)
`i
`LO‘ : ID ‘
`Turin (hr)
`
`
`g
`0.8 t II)
`23* z (D
`
`
`Males!
`i
`3
`
`71:4 $2.20
`42.9mm
`313.229.!
`E
`AUCog: 1.; (“M01")
`
`
`
`
`1.2-1 tflJSS 7.54 25.30
`46.53433
`
`
`Cnmx (WM)
`i
`mum ‘ as“:
`0.81132
`Imafl'fl-
`
`
`2933255
`AIJCuzq m in.“ nlxr}
`
`
`43.9mm ‘
`
`.0930;
`
`W‘or‘xrxafifii"
`‘
`
`
`Mm of Mczfimiiu
`
`
`' The: deals «mu-d ls from I alums! (xvi).
`If) :- lnsufficzma dim available for caknhliem
`
`
`\‘amn m: the nm'm 3:: 5851.
`
`
`Mm: Plum bow:$2095 (Mdt‘mni’a) Toxicakiaaic bran-arm » pm; week 1;
`MK-Mfi rkmfmmin fwd *
`'3
`
`LL
`;
`sin-.10 /
`; mzm : ”6:11:
`
`'50.“: [D
`63.7“ t m
`
`W tummy E mam
`
`AMme-‘d‘m
`~324x19“)
`(we (hr
`
`M109.» 3. ”Nd“?
`
`‘ilGS 3 424231372
`‘
`
`am e
`:99 a :75 -’
`
`5806: atMedical“.
`‘mdwrw5ftw : wannfllz‘h
`lb = Mifuciwl Jan mam: for takht‘efim.
`WM r—M “K may: a, W .
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.610.315; 65.42535 1 342:243 l
`$010,186 11.42.0529 i- 623:4.63‘ g
`
`
`1.05:0.0
`(18:0,!
`3
`0.59201
`%
`amaffim-OJM.
`
`g
`‘3 Dose ekauhnuiu
`
`SEMM.
`Vaiuei: we
`mean
`
`
`[Jun
`
`Exposure to Metformin
`
`
`
`523 £63.15
`592 2593’
`
`
`» .154 i 1.1.2
`134: £65.
`m 2 25'3
`
`L0 50“)
`11.01503,
`
`113:“! -
`
`Males
`
`
`
`
`1 must»
`caesofi
`s
`
`4-(Sé75.8 1 553:393 j 535 :3“ 541236)
`
`
`
`
`
`H223“:
`232217;.
`E 1901155
`«Aims j
`5.0mm g
`1.020.0-
`
`
`
`
`zusm '
`E
`uni-+30%
`
`
`5392322
`$33} «3.7
`
`
`. j Wit-14:8 g n
`.
`
`
`.m wheéfiflflwimleit 49...”;
`
`:Mcg’fifimfw
`
`’ M}s{§inf<miu
`~
`
`i 32:24
`~ vmic: the
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`

`

`
`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier, PhD.
`
`‘
`
`NDA No. 22-044
`
` a;
`
`a9.
`Control and 50mg/kg
`
`Key study findings:
`
`0 One female was found dead on day l6 following body weight loss and reduced
`food intake.
`
`0 One female was sacrificed on day 23 for physical signs; plasma lactate was
`markedly elevated and bicarbonate reduced just prior to sacrifice, likely an effect
`of morbidity than true drug-related lactic acidosis.
`
`o The timing of deaths is similar to deaths in response to the combination with MK-
`0431 in study #TT 06-6000.
`
`0 Mean plasma lactate increased 5 2 fold in metformin-treated females (high end of '
`historical range), but bicarbonate was unchanged.
`
`Reviewer Comments:
`
`This study shows that 50mg/kg metformin is not well-tolerated in dogs, with 2 of 5
`females dying by drug day 23. Merck suggests that metformin—induced lactic acidosis
`underlies morbidity/mortality in the dogs, but the reviewer concludes that morbidity in
`
`the dogs may be responsible for elevations in plasma lactate. The NDA '
`(Glucophage) review states that animal (rodent) studies have provided conflicting results
`relative to lactate prOduction, and that death of dogs administered metformin are
`associated with symptoms of GI distress, vascular lesions, and degenerative changes in
`the brain, heart, kidney, and skeletal muscle (NDA W ), which are reasonable
`alternative explanations for the deaths.
`
`The mechanism of metformin-related death is less important than the occurrence of
`death; a 50mg/kg dose with an exposure of 2 400 uM*h appears too high for combination
`toxicity studies in dogs.
`
`The reviewer concludes that the deaths of female dogs given the combination of MK—
`0431 and metformin may be due to metformin toxicity rather than exacerbated toxicity of
`the combination.
`
`21
`
`

`

`
`Reviewer: Todd Bourcier PhD.
`.
`*
`NDA No. 22-044
`
`Study no.2 TT—06—6018
`Volume #, and page #:
`Conducting laboratory and location: MRL, Chibret, France
`GLP compliance: No
`QA report: yes (. ) no ( x)
`Drug, lot #, and % purity:
`Metformin, lot L—000282095-001L012, fromW
`
`Methods
`
`
`
`Control and 50 mg/kg groups
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C
`
`
`
`
`Route formulation
`Oral gavage of drug in 0.5% methylcellulose/water
`
`dose volume
`
`
`
`Number/sex/ rou :
`{main study!
`
`5 females
`
`After first dose and drug week 3
`
`Results:
`
`Mortaligl: Two females died during the study. One female (#05-0277) was found dead
`before dosing on drug day 16, and the other (#06-0047) was sacrificed after dosing on
`drug day 23 due to marked physical signs.
`
`Female 05-02 77: This female lost 1.2 kg body weight and food intake decreased
`markedly before death. Plasma lactate was elevated, but not substantially.
`
`Female 06—004 7: This female had labored breathing and lateral recumbency prior to
`sacrifice. Plasma lactate was markedly increased (177 mg/dL), bicarbonate decreased
`(l3mM), and glucose, potassium, and chlo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket